Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-t6st2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-16T15:43:15.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Positioning the reader: the effect of narrative point-of-view and familiarity of experience on situation model construction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2015

MELISSA MULCAHY  and
BETHANIE GOULDTHORP
MELISSA MULCAHY
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Western Australia
BETHANIE GOULDTHORP*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Western Australia
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr Bethanie Gouldthorp, School of Psychology, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch WA 6150, Australia. tel: + 61 08 9360 2348; fax: +61 08 9360 6492; e-mail: B.Gouldthorp@murdoch.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous research suggests that situation model construction may be influenced by a reader’s ability to embody the first-person perspective of the protagonist, including character emotions, during online comprehension. This study examined the effect of narrative point-of-view and readers’ own prior personal experience on reading engagement and comprehension. Participants read eighty short story passages on a computer screen, each describing either a familiar or an unfamiliar event. Stories were written in the first or third person, and either featured or did not feature a shift in protagonist emotions in the last sentence of the text. The results indicated that the use of third-person narrative point-of-view had an overall effect on reading engagement and enhanced readers’ ability to monitor changing character emotions. First-person narrative point-of-view, however, promoted protagonist empathy when participants read about unfamiliar events. The results also provide support for the conclusion that readers were more engaged with the story and constructed more effective situation models when they had prior personal experience of story events.

Keywords

narrativepoint-of-viewfamiliarityperspectiveemotionreadingengagement

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 96 - 123
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

references

Abelson, R. P. (1975). Does a story understander need a point of view? Proceedings of the 1975 Workshop on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, USA (pp. 140–143), online: <doi: 10.3115/980190.980230>.CrossRef.>Google Scholar
Barnet, V., & Lewis, T. (1994). Outliers in statistical data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Black, J. B., Turner, T. J., & Bower, G. H. (1979). Point of view in narrative comprehension, memory and production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., & Taylor, H. A. (2009). When You and I share perspectives: pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science, 20, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., & Taylor, H. A. (2011). Perspectives and emotion simulation during narrative comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 569–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vega, M. (1995). Backward updating of mental models during continuous reading of narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 373–385.Google Scholar
de Vega, M., Leon, A. C., & Diaz, J. M. (1996). The representation of changing emotions in reading comprehension. Cognition & Emotion, 10, 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditman, T., Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., & Taylor, H. A. (2010). Simulating an enactment effect: pronouns guide action simulation during narrative comprehension. Cognition, 115, 172–178.Google Scholar
Gabriel, S., & Young, A. F. (2011). Becoming a vampire without being bitten: the narrative collective-assimilation hypothesis. Psychological Science, 22, 990–994.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A., Hallada, B. M., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1998). How automatically do readers infer fictional characters’ emotional states? Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 271–300.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. (2011). How reading comprehension is embodied and why that matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 5–18, online: <http://www.iejee.com/>.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2003). The body’s contribution to language. New York: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: the role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247–266.Google Scholar
Green, M. C. (2006). Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication, 56, 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: the role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14, 311–327.Google Scholar
Green, M. C., & Donahue, J. K. (2009). Simulated worlds: transportation into narratives. In Klein, D., William, M. P., & Suhr, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 241–254). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.Google Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves Theory of Mind. Science, 342, 377–380.Google Scholar
Komeda, H., Kawasaki, M., Tsunemi, K., & Kusumi, T. (2009). Differences between estimating protagonists’ emotions and evaluating readers’ emotions in narrative comprehension. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komeda, H., & Kusumi, T. (2006). The effect of a protagonist’s emotional shift on situation model construction. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1548–1556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lutz, M. F., & Radvansky, G. A. (1997). The fate of completed goal information in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 293–310.Google Scholar
Munro, D. (2000). Defining literature: a student’s guide. Melbourne: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanford, A. J., & Emmott, C. (2012). Mind, brain and narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Boven, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Social projection of transient drive states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1159–1168.Google Scholar
Yao, B., Belin, P., & Scheepers, C. (2011). Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice selective areas in the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3146–3152.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (1999a). Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models. Discourse Processes, 28, 81–88.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (1999b). Situation models: the mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: an event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292–297.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 386–397.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185.Google Scholar