Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6c7dr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-12T02:11:03.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Funding of Non-profit Social Organizations Affects the Number of Volunteers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Mads Roke Clausen
Mads Roke Clausen*
Affiliation:
Visiting Fellow London School of Economics, Department of Social Policy, Department of Social Sciences and Business, Fellow Roskilde University, Universitetsvej 1, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
*
roke@ruc.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent decades, significant changes have occurred to how charities and non-profit organizations are funded. However, only limited research has considered how the new financial landscape affects the work being carried out by these organizations. This article presents a quantitative analysis of the relationship between financing and the number of volunteers. The data material consists of panel data on revenue streams to nationwide, social, non-profit organizations in Denmark. The analysis reveals a strong, positive relationship between both value-driven general revenues and the organizations’ equity in relation to the number of volunteers. Conversely, targeted and means-driven investments do not have any significant correlation with the number of volunteers. Overall, the findings point to the fact that more volunteers can be attracted through forms of financing that strengthen the stability and organizational capacity of an organization as well as its ability to independently organize the work to be done.

Keywords

Social financeVolunteersNon-profitSocial investmentOrganizational capacity

Information

Type
Research Papers
Information
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 362 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © International Society for Third-Sector Research 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abraham, K. G., & Mackie, C. (2004). Beyond the market: Designing nonmarket accounts for the United States. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Aiken, M., & Harris, M. (2017). The 'hollowing out' of smaller third sector organisations?. Voluntary Sector Review, 8(3), 333–342. doi: 10.1332/204080517X15090106925654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, P. (2016). The history of third sector service delivery in the UK. In Rees, J. & Mullins, D. (Eds.), The third sector delivering public services. Bristol: Bristol University, Press Policy Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, J., Hede, A., & Andersen, J. G. (2017). Tilliden til samfundets bærebjælker [Confidence in the pillars of society]. Copenhagen: Tryg Foundation.Google Scholar
Andersen, L. L. (2019). Hybride civilsamfundsorganisationer under forandring: Neoliberale praksisser, marked og civile rettigheder [Hybrid civil society organizations under change: Neoliberal practices, market and civil rights]. Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv, 21(4), 67–75. doi: 10.7146/tfa.v21i4.118066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, S., Hardill, I., & Wilson, R. (2011). Introduction: Remixing the economy of welfare?. Social Policy and Society, 10(3), 337–339. doi: 10.1017/S1474746411000066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, N. (2001). Time-series-cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years?. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 271. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. The American Political Science Review, 100(4), 67–67.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. (1991). Managing contracted services in the nonprofit agency. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Body, A. (2015). Weathering the storm: Understanding the voluntary sector through a fields theory analysis: Early findings of a case study of preventative children’s services in Kent. Working paper presented at Voluntary Sector and Volunteering Research Conference, NCVO, Leeds.Google Scholar
Boje, T. P. (2017). Civilsamfund, medborgerskab og deltagelse [Civil society, citizenship and participation]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels.Google Scholar
Chapman, T. (2017). Journeys and destinations: Using longitudinal analysis to explore how third sector organisational governance helps to navigate sustainable futures. Voluntary sector review., 8(1), 3–24. doi: 10.1332/204080516X14799054697067. [Online].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, C., & Osborne, S. P. (2008). Strategic positioning in UK charities that provides services. Public Money & Management, 28(5), 283–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2008.00657.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, D., Geyne-Rahme, F., & Mohan, J. (2013). Variations between organisations and localities in government funding of third-sector activity: Evidence from the national survey of third-sector organisations in England. Urban Studies, 50(5), 959–976. doi: 10.1177/0042098012458550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espersen, H. H., Andersen, L. L., Olsen, L., & Tortzen, A. (2018). Understøttelse og udvikling af det frivillige sociale arbejde [Support and development of voluntary social work]. Copenhagen: VIVE – The Danish Center for Social Science Research.Google Scholar
Fridberg, t, & Henriksen, L. S., , (2014). Udvikling i frivilligt socialt arbejde [Development in voluntary social work]. Copenhagen: SFI.Google Scholar
Frumkin, P., & Kim, M. T. (2002). The effect of government funding on nonprofit administrative efficiency: An empirical test. Cambridge: Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Gronbjerg, K. A. (1991). Managing grants and contracts: The case of four nonprofit social service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(1), 5–24. doi: 10.1177/089976409102000103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, L. S., & Bundesen, P. (2004). The moving frontier in Denmark: Voluntary-state relationships since 1850. Journal of Social Policy, 33(4), 605–625. doi: 10.1017/S0047279404008025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, L. S., Koch-Nielsen, I., & Rosdahl, D. (2008). Formal and informal volunteering in a Nordic context: The case of Denmark. Journal of Civil Society, 4(3), 193–209. doi: 10.1080/17448680802559685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibsen, B. (1997). Fordærver pengene foreningerne? [Does money corrupt associations?]. Politica, 29(1), 49. doi: 10.7146/politica.v29i1.68102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishkanian, A., & Szreter, S. (2012). The big society debate: A new agenda for social welfare?. London: Edward Elgar doi: 10.4337/9781781002087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, J., Mohan, J., Brookes, N., & Yoon, Y. (2018). The English voluntary sector: How volunteering and policy climate perceptions matter. Journal of Social Policy, 47(4), 759–782. doi: 10.1017/S0047279418000107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R. M. (1994). Voluntary agencies and the contract culture. Social Service Review, 68(1), 33–60. doi: 10.1086/604032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lie, M., & Baines, S. (2007). Making sense of organizational change: Voices of older volunteers. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18(3), 225–240. doi: 10.1007/s11266-007-9043-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorentzen, H., & Henriksen, L. S. (2014). The invention and institutionalization of volunteer centers: A comparative analysis of Norway and Denmark. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(3), 589–608. doi: 10.1177/0899764013476765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milbourne, L. (2013). Voluntary sector in transition: Hard times or new opportunities?. Bristol: Policy Press doi: 10.1332/policypress/9781847427236.001.0001.Google Scholar
Milbourne, L., & Murray, U. (2017). Civil society organizations in turbulent times: A gilded web?. London: Trebtham Books.Google Scholar
Milbourne, L., & Murray, U. (2017B). Dangerous liaisons and spaces for resistance. In civil society organizations in turbulent times: A gilded web?. London: Trebtham Books.Google Scholar
Mulgan, G., et al. (2015). Nicholls, (Ed.). Social finance Does ‘investment’ add value?. Social finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703761.003.0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, U. (2017). Voluntary organizations and criminal justice: A misguided turn. In Milbourne, L. & Murray, U. (Eds.), Civil society organizations in turbulent times: A gilded web?. London: Trebtham Books.Google Scholar
Nicholls, A. (2010). The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 70–100. doi: 10.1080/19420671003701257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, A., et al. (2015). Social Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703761.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, A., & Emerson, J., et al. (2015). Social finance: Capitalizing social impact. In Nicholls, A. (Ed.). Social finance (pp. 1–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703761.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pharoah, C. (2012). Finding the big society. In A: Ishkanian & S. Szreter, see above.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. (2010). Putting the civil society sector on the economic map of the world. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 81(2), 167–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2010.00409.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salway, M. (2017). Social investment as a new charity finance tool: Using both head and heart. Centre for Charity Effectiveness, Cass Business School: University of London.Google Scholar
Schon, D. (1983). The reflexive practioner: How practitioner think in action. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Sivesind, K. H. (ed.). (2016). Mot en ny skandinavisk velferdsmodell? [Toward a new Scandinavia welfare model?] Institut for samfundsforskning, rapport 2016 01.Google Scholar
Skalts, V., & Nørgaard, M. (1981). Mødrehjælpens epoke [The era of Mothers’ Aid]. Copenhagen: Forlaget Rhodos.Google Scholar
Smith, S. R. (2018). The future of nonprofit human services. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 8(4), 369–389. doi: 10.1515/npf-2017-0019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (2018). Handbook on non-profit institutions in the system of national account. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division.Google Scholar
Young, D., et al. (2015). Nicholls, (Ed.). Financing social innovation. Social finance (pp. 96–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703761.003.0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warburton, J., Moore, M., & Oppeinhemer, M. (2018). Challenges to the recruitment and retention of volunteers in traditional nonprofit organizations: A case study of Australian meals on wheels. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(16), 1361–1373. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2017.1390581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Whitfield, D. (2014). The ideological context. NCIA Inquiry into the Future of Voluntary Services.Google Scholar
Wijkström, F. (2011). Charity speak and business talk: The on-going (re)hybridization of civil. The transformation of the popular movement tradition. Nomos: In Nordic civil society at a cross-roads.Google Scholar
Wijkström, F., & Zimmer, A. (2011). Introduction: Nordic civil societies beyond. The transformation of the popular movement tradition. Nomos: In Nordic civil society at a cross-roads.Google Scholar