Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T22:31:04.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inertial stretching separation in binary droplet collisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2021

Karrar H. Al-Dirawi*
Affiliation:
School of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Khaled H.A. Al-Ghaithi
Affiliation:
EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Fluid Dynamics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Thomas C. Sykes
Affiliation:
EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Fluid Dynamics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK
J. Rafael Castrejón-Pita
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
Andrew E. Bayly*
Affiliation:
School of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
Email addresses for correspondence: k.h.n.al-dirawi@leeds.ac.uk, a.e.bayly@leeds.ac.uk
Email addresses for correspondence: k.h.n.al-dirawi@leeds.ac.uk, a.e.bayly@leeds.ac.uk

Abstract

Binary droplet collisions exhibit a wide range of outcomes, including coalescence and stretching separation, with a transition between these two outcomes arising for high Weber numbers and impact parameters. Our experimental study elucidates the effect of viscosity on this transition, which we show exhibits inertial (viscosity-independent) behaviour over an order-of-magnitude-wide range of Ohnesorge numbers. That is, the transition is not always shifted towards higher impact parameters by increasing droplet viscosity, as it might be thought from the existing literature. Moreover, we provide compelling experimental evidence that stretching separation only arises if the length of the coalesced droplet exceeds a critical multiple of the original droplet diameters (3.35). Using this as a criterion, we provide a simple but robust model (without any arbitrarily chosen free parameters) to predict the coalescence/stretching-separation transition.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the geometry of a collision; the shaded regions indicate the non-interaction regions. (b) A typical regime map for binary droplet collisions, showing the most common collision outcomes. The C–SS transition (red dashed line) is of interest here (cf. figure 8); the C–reflexive separation (RS) transition (purple dotted line) is considered in § 3.4.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Highly deformable SS, with ${We}=90$, ${Oh}=0.02$ and ${B}=0.37$. (b) Slightly deformable SS, with ${We}=40$, ${Oh}=0.16$ and ${B}=0.51$. Both cases in (a) and (b) capture the onset of SS.

Figure 2

Figure 3. A sketch of our experimental set-up.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Dynamics of 2 % HPMC (${Oh} = 0.021$) droplet collisions at ${We} = 56$ for different impact parameters ${B}$, from head-on collision exhibiting RS (first column), through C (second and third columns), to the onset of SS (fourth column). The latter transition (between the second/third and fourth columns) is of primary interest here.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Critical maximum length leading to separation in terms of ${We}$ and ${Oh}$, for various ${B}_c \in [0.55,0.3]$. The error bar represents the propagation of the measurement uncertainty arising from the resolution (note that all points have the same order of error). The fit of Saroka & Ashgriz (2015), $\tilde {L}_{max,c} = 3 + 0.006{We}$, is included for comparison.

Figure 5

Figure 6. (a) Influence of the impact parameter, ${B}$ on the maximum length that the coalesced droplets attain, for a wide range of ${We}$ and ${Oh}$ (solid symbols, C, and hollow, SS). (b) The change in slope of $\tilde {L}_{max}(B)$ with ${We}$ for ${B}>0.2$ up to the threshold of SS, for a wide range of ${Oh}$.

Figure 6

Figure 7. The measured ratio of viscous loss, in the compression phase at ${B}=0$, to the initial kinetic energy for a wide range of ${Oh}$.

Figure 7

Figure 8. The C–SS transition, demonstrating the inertial behaviour for a wide range of ${Oh}$. The inset image shows the C–SS transition for ${Oh}$ higher and lower than the inertial range. The red Oh scale represents the inertial range ($\alpha = 0.65$). The performance of the model (3.1) is also shown in both figures. The black line represents the model with $\alpha = 0.65$, while the red shaded region around it represents the scattering of $\pm 0.05$ in the plateau of $\alpha ({Oh})$. The error bars represent the uncertainty of the transition location.

Supplementary material: File

Al-Dirawi et al. supplementary material

Al-Dirawi et al. supplementary material

Download Al-Dirawi et al. supplementary material(File)
File 536.8 KB