Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-zlvph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T08:15:41.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sharks and skates in the Comau Fjord, northern Patagonia, Chile: an elasmobranch species checklist with biological aspects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2025

Mette K. Schiønning*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark Fundacion San Ignacio del Huinay, Hualaihue, Puerto Montt, Chile
Lara Marcús
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastian, Puerto Montt, Chile
Ana Veríssimo
Affiliation:
CIBIO-InBIO, Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto, Vairão, Portugal BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Vairão, Portugal
Aris Thomasberger
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark Fundacion San Ignacio del Huinay, Hualaihue, Puerto Montt, Chile
Stacy A. Ballyram
Affiliation:
Fundacion San Ignacio del Huinay, Hualaihue, Puerto Montt, Chile Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
Günter Försterra
Affiliation:
Fundacion San Ignacio del Huinay, Hualaihue, Puerto Montt, Chile Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
Francisco J. Concha
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y de Recursos Naturales, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
*
Corresponding author: Mette K. Schiønning; Email: mekjs@aqua.dtu.dk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fjord ecosystems serve as crucial habitats for elasmobranchs, supporting them across all life stages. Chilean Patagonia provides one of the most complex and extensive networks of fjord ecosystems in the world, displaying high marine biodiversity, including elasmobranchs. However, little is known about this ecologically important group of fishes in these ecosystems. This study investigates the biodiversity of elasmobranchs in the Comau Fjord over a period of 6 months by combining morphological and molecular data. In total, 309 specimens within a radius of 7.5 km were recorded, belonging to six families and nine species: Hexanchus griseus (77.5–178 cm LT), Notorynchus cepedianus (180.6 cm LT), Schroederichthys bivius (35–65.2 cm LT), Scymnodon macracanthus (37.3 cm LT), Centrophorus squamosus (87.4 cm LT), Deania calceus (58.3–98.6 cm LT), Squalus acanthias (25.5–101.1 cm LT), Dipturus chilensis (62.9–152 cm LT), and Dipturus trachyderma (69.8–194 cm LT). This included records of three species previously unknown in the fjord and was equivalent to nearly 20% of the elasmobranch richness found in Southern Chile. The results further suggest that the Comau Fjord could be a primary nursery ground for several species of elasmobranchs. This is the first time that a species inventory of elasmobranchs is conducted in a Chilean fjord system. The outcomes of this research provide an elasmobranch species checklist with biological aspects from the Comau Fjord, which are essential data to inform decision makers, conservation managers, and future research.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of the Comau Fjord (42 °S) with the sampling locations (A) within South America (B) and northern Patagonia in Chile (C). The monthly sampling of the elasmobranchs was conducted from May to October 2018 on locations 1–10. The additional locations 11–14 represent the opportunistically sampled and observed specimens from January 2017 to April 2018. The contour lines are expressed as depth in meters (50–450 m depth).

Figure 1

Table 1. Reference sequences of the ND2 genes used in molecular identification and phylogenetic analyses

Figure 2

Figure 2. Stacked bar chart shows the relative species composition at each sampling station (1−10) and the opportunistically sampled and observed specimens (11−14).

Figure 3

Table 2. Results overview showing by family; species; sex; total number (n) of specimens; relative species composition of the longlined specimens (%); range of total lengths (cm), life stages as immature (I), developing (II) and mature (III), in the Comau Fjord from 2017 to 2018. The estimated length-at-50%-maturity (Lm) for females of each species is shown under the table

Figure 4

Figure 3. Neighbour-joining tree of p-distances among nucleotide sequences of the ND2 gene. Bootstrap support values were generated using 1000 replicates and are shown on the branches if >75%. Reference sequences are shown with GenBank Accession numbers, while newly generated sequences are shown with the sample number after species name. No sequence from Dipturus trachyderma was included in the analysis since the sequence length obtained was much shorter than those from other taxa.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Hexanchus griseus (Hexanchidae) specimens. (A) Lateral view of an immature female (#46). (B) Ventral view of the head of an immature male (#229). (C) Portion of the upper set of teeth (#114). (D) Portion of the lower set of teeth. (E) Young juvenile with a visible, healed vitelline scar (#228).

Figure 6

Figure 5. Notorynchus cepedianus (Hexanchidae) specimens. (A) Lateral view of a developing female specimen (#6). (B) Dorsal view of the head and the trunk. (C) Ventral view of the head. (D) A portion of the upper set of teeth. (E) A portion of the lower set of teeth. (F) Screenshot of a video with an N. cepedianus encounter during a SCUBA dive at 10 meters depth in December 2017 (Figure 1, Location 12). (G) An N. cepedianus caught near a salmon farm in March 2017 by a local fisher (Figure 1, Location 13).

Figure 7

Figure 6. Schroederichthys bivius (Atelomycteridae) specimens. (A) Lateral view of a developing male (#156). (B) Dorsal view of the head and the trunk of a developing male (#8). (C) Ventral view of the head of a mature male (#174). (D) Lateral view of the head and the trunk of a mature male (#256).

Figure 8

Figure 7. Scymnodon macracanthus (Somniosidae) specimen (#239). (A) Dorsal view. (B) Dorsal view of the head. (C) Ventral view of the head and the trunk.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Centrophorus squamosus (Centrophoridae) specimen (#69). (A) Lateral view of a mature male. (B) Ventral view of the head. (C) Dorsal view of the head and the trunk.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Deania calceus (Centrophoridae) specimens. (A) Lateral view of a female (#217). (B) Ventral view of the head of a female (#218). (C) Dorsal view of the head (#218). (D) Upper and lower set of the teeth of a mature female (#121).

Figure 11

Figure 10. Squalus acanthias (Squalidae) specimens. (A) Lateral view of an immature male (#133). (B) Dorsal view of the head of a mature male (#146). (C) Ventral view of the head and the trunk of a mature male (#128). (D) Immature male with a healed translucent vitelline scar (#5).

Figure 12

Figure 11. Dipturus chilensis (Rajidae) specimens. (A) Dorsal view of a female (#223). (B) Ventral view of a developing male (#150). (C) Dorsal view of a female with visible ocelli on the pectoral fins (#238). (D) Dorsal view of the head of a female with lighter spots (#223).

Figure 13

Figure 12. Dipturus trachyderma (Rajidae) specimens. (A) Dorsal view of a female (#22). (B) Ventral view of a female (#22). (C) Dorsal view of the head of a large mature male (#240). (D) Ventral view of pointy claspers (#240).

Figure 14

Table 3. A presence (+)/absence (−) list of elasmobranchs observed in the Comau Fjord in 2007, 2013, and 2017–2018, including their status on the IUCN Red List (i.e. EN = Endangered; VU = Vulnerable; NT = Near Threatened; LC = Least Concern; DD = Data Deficient) and a downwards arrow to indicate a status with a decreasing trend ()