Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T13:57:26.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2020

Toby Spribille*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA
Alan M. Fryday
Affiliation:
Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
Sergio Pérez-Ortega
Affiliation:
Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain
Måns Svensson
Affiliation:
Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
Tor Tønsberg
Affiliation:
Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
Stefan Ekman
Affiliation:
Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
Håkon Holien
Affiliation:
Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
Philipp Resl
Affiliation:
Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany
Kevin Schneider
Affiliation:
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
Edith Stabentheiner
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria
Holger Thüs
Affiliation:
Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
Jan Vondrák
Affiliation:
Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
Lewis Sharman
Affiliation:
Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O. Box 140, Gustavus, Alaska 99826, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Toby Spribille. E-mail: toby.spribille@ualberta.ca

Abstract

Lichens are widely acknowledged to be a key component of high latitude ecosystems. However, the time investment needed for full inventories and the lack of taxonomic identification resources for crustose lichen and lichenicolous fungal diversity have hampered efforts to fully gauge the depth of species richness in these ecosystems. Using a combination of classical field inventory and extensive deployment of chemical and molecular analysis, we assessed the diversity of lichens and associated fungi in Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska (USA), a mixed landscape of coastal boreal rainforest and early successional low elevation habitats deglaciated after the Little Ice Age. We collected nearly 5000 specimens and found a total of 947 taxa, including 831 taxa of lichen-forming and 96 taxa of lichenicolous fungi together with 20 taxa of saprotrophic fungi typically included in lichen studies. A total of 98 species (10.3% of those detected) could not be assigned to known species and of those, two genera and 27 species are described here as new to science: Atrophysma cyanomelanos gen. et sp. nov., Bacidina circumpulla, Biatora marmorea, Carneothele sphagnicola gen. et sp. nov., Cirrenalia lichenicola, Corticifraga nephromatis, Fuscidea muskeg, Fuscopannaria dillmaniae, Halecania athallina, Hydropunctaria alaskana, Lambiella aliphatica, Lecania hydrophobica, Lecanora viridipruinosa, Lecidea griseomarginata, L. streveleri, Miriquidica gyrizans, Niesslia peltigerae, Ochrolechia cooperi, Placynthium glaciale, Porpidia seakensis, Rhizocarpon haidense, Sagiolechia phaeospora, Sclerococcum fissurinae, Spilonema maritimum, Thelocarpon immersum, Toensbergia blastidiata and Xenonectriella nephromatis. An additional 71 ‘known unknown’ species are cursorily described. Four new combinations are made: Lepra subvelata (G. K. Merr.) T. Sprib., Ochrolechia minuta (Degel.) T. Sprib., Steineropsis laceratula (Hue) T. Sprib. & Ekman and Toensbergia geminipara (Th. Fr.) T. Sprib. & Resl. Thirty-eight taxa are new to North America and 93 additional taxa new to Alaska. We use four to eight DNA loci to validate the placement of ten of the new species in the orders Baeomycetales, Ostropales, Lecanorales, Peltigerales, Pertusariales and the broader class Lecanoromycetes with maximum likelihood analyses. We present a total of 280 new fungal DNA sequences. The lichen inventory from Glacier Bay National Park represents the second largest number of lichens and associated fungi documented from an area of comparable size and the largest to date in North America. Coming from almost 60°N, these results again underline the potential for high lichen diversity in high latitude ecosystems.

Information

Type
Standard Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2020
Figure 0

Fig. 1. A, Alaska and the north-east Pacific showing US national parks in which major lichen inventories have been conducted in the last ten years (outlined); B, Glacier Bay National Park, showing sample sites (black circles) and subdivisions into sectors referred to in the text (separated by black lines). Geographical sectors are indicated as follows (see text for more details): DUN = Dundas, EA = East Arm, EX = Excursion Ridge, GB = Glacier Bay, GUS = Gustavus, WA = West Arm.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Thirty-year monthly normals of precipitation and temperature near sea level from the station at Glacier Bay (NOAA 2000). Walter-Lieth diagram indicating temperature (°C) on left y-axis and precipitation (mm) on right y-axis (with daily maximum average temperature of the warmest month and daily minimum average temperature of the coldest month in black along left margin), as well as mean annual temperature and precipitation (top right, black).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. GLBA landscapes. A, terminus of Riggs Glacier (East Arm) in 2014; B, recently deglaciated Dryas mats with numerous Stereocaulon species just east of the terminus of Muir Glacier (East Arm) in 2014; C, alder thicket along a jeep trail at Tower Road near the park entrance (Gustavus sector; M. Svensson); D, Pinus contorta muskeg in the Falls Creek area, not glaciated during the Little Ice Age (included in the Excursion Ridge sector); E, Picea sitchensis rainforest near Bartlett Cove (Gustavus sector); F, alpine meadows and heaths on Excursion Ridge, the richest locality studied for lichens and associated fungi.

Figure 3

Table 1. Voucher information and NCBI GenBank Accession numbers for all specimens from which DNA sequences are newly generated for this study. Voucher information and sequence accession numbers for specimens from which no newly generated data are provided here can be found in Supplementary Material Table S3 (available online). A dash (–) indicates no data, an asterisk (*) indicates that the voucher does not appear in any tree in the present paper. GenBank Accessions beginning with letters other than ‘MN’ or ‘MT’ represent sequences generated in other studies.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. A, Venn diagram of species occurrence within the six sectors of GLBA. Numbers do not add up to 947 because one species (Melanohalea olivacea) could not be assigned to any one sector due to a lack of site data. All species of lichens and lichen-associated fungi, including ‘known unknowns’, are included in this diagram. Where a number is absent from a segment, the value is zero; B, occurrence of named lichen species across four national parks and preserves in the Gulf of Alaska region (lichen-associated fungi and ‘known unknowns’ not included). Data is based on the present paper (Supplementary Material Table S4A & B, available online), Spribille et al. (2010) and McCune et al. (2018).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Majority-rule consensus tree of the class Lecanoromycetes, showing the placement of two new species (in bold) using selected voucher specimens and eight loci. Dots and dashes to the right of tip names indicate presence and absence of loci, respectively, in the following order: ITS, 18S, 28S, mtSSU, Mcm7, RPB1, RPB2, EF1a. Values indicate percent bootstrap support. Alphanumeric codes in brackets are identifiers unique to this study. Voucher information and GenBank Accession numbers are outlined in Table 1 and Supplementary Material Table S3 (available online).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Majority-rule consensus tree of the order Pertusariales (subclass Ostropomycetidae) based on eight loci. Dots and dashes to the right of tip names indicate presence and absence of loci, respectively, in the following order: ITS, 18S, 28S, mtSSU, Mcm7, RPB1, RPB2, EF1a. Values indicate percent bootstrap support. Novel taxa are in bold. Alphanumeric codes in brackets are identifiers unique to this study. Voucher information and GenBank Accession numbers are outlined in Table 1 and Supplementary Material Table S3 (available online).

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Majority-rule consensus tree of the orders Ostropales and Gyalectales (subclass Ostropomycetidae) showing placement of two new species (in bold) based on eight loci. Dots and dashes to the right of tip names indicate presence and absence of loci, respectively, in the following order: ITS, 18S, 28S, mtSSU, Mcm7, RPB1, RPB2, EF1a. Values indicate percent bootstrap support. Alphanumeric codes in brackets are identifiers unique to this study. Voucher information and GenBank Accession numbers are outlined in Table 1 and Supplementary Material Table S3 (available online).

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Majority-rule consensus tree of the order Baeomycetales (subclass Ostropomycetidae) based on eight loci. Dots and dashes to the right of tip names indicate presence and absence of loci, respectively, in the following order: ITS, 18S, 28S, mtSSU, Mcm7, RPB1, RPB2, EF1a. Values indicate percent bootstrap support. Novel taxa are in bold. Alphanumeric codes in brackets are identifiers unique to this study. Voucher information and GenBank Accession numbers are outlined in Table 1 and Supplementary Material Table S3 (available online).

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Majority-rule consensus tree of the suborder Collematineae (order Peltigerales) showing placement (in bold) of four new species and a ‘known unknown’ based on four loci. Dots and dashes to the right of tip names indicate presence and absence of loci, respectively, in the following order: ITS, 28S, mtSSU, Mcm7. Values indicate percent bootstrap support. Alphanumeric codes in brackets are identifiers unique to this study. Voucher information and GenBank Accession numbers are outlined in Table 1 and Supplementary Material Table S3 (available online).

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Majority-rule consensus tree of the order Lecanorales (subclass Lecanoromycetidae) showing placement (in bold) of three new species and several ‘known unknowns’ or previously poorly understood taxa, based on five loci. Dots and dashes to the right of tip names indicate presence and absence of loci, respectively, in the following order: ITS, 18S, 28S, mtSSU, Mcm7. Values indicate percent bootstrap support. Alphanumeric codes in brackets are identifiers unique to this study. Voucher information and GenBank Accession numbers are outlined in Table 1 and Supplementary Material Table S3 (available online).

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Atrophysma cyanomelanos (holotype). A & B, habit; C, habit with SEM; D, broken thallus lobe with SEM; E, broken thallus lobe in brightfield microscopy; F, ascoma section (composite image); G, ascus stained in Lugol's solution. Scales: A = 1 mm; B & C = 0.5 mm; D & F = 50 μm; E & G = 10 μm.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Bacidina circumpulla. A, part of thallus with pale and medium dark apothecia (holotype); B, thallus with dark-pigmented apothecia (Fryday 10017); C, section of relatively pale apothecium, with brown pigment in upper part of proper exciple and irregularly in hymenium (holotype); D, section of dark apothecium with more pigment in exciple and hymenium, including some green pigment in upper part of exciple (mixed with the brown) (holotype). Scales: A & B = 0.5 mm; C & D = 50 μm.

Figure 13

Fig. 13. Biatora marmorea (holotype). A & B, habitus; C, section through hymenium and hypothecium, arrows indicate pigment incrustations on paraphysis tips; D, section through excipulum; E, asci and ascospores in Lugol's solution. Scales: A = 1 mm; B = 100 μm; C–E = 10 μm.

Figure 14

Fig. 14. Carneothele sphagnicola (A & B from Spribille 40821; C–F from Spribille 40824). A & B, habitus; C, section through ascoma; D, ascomatal section in Lugol's solution, showing deeply amyloid hymenial region and adjacent non-amyloid zone; E, ascoma in K, demonstrating dendritic crystals; F, ascospores in Lugol's solution, showing characteristic amyloid reaction. Scales: A & B = 0.5 mm; C–E = 50 μm; F = 10 μm.

Figure 15

Fig. 15. Cirrenalia lichenicola (holotype). A, sporodochia; B, conidia; C, detail of a coiled conidium (B & C in water, using DIC microscopy). Scales: A = 100 μm; B = 20 μm; C = 5 μm.

Figure 16

Fig. 16. Corticifraga nephromatis (holotype). A, ascomata; B, transverse section of ascoma; C, detail of hymenium and excipulum; D, paraphyses; E, young ascus; F, mature ascus; G–I, ascospores (B & C in lactophenol blue; D–I in water using DIC microscopy). Scales: A = 200 μm; B = 50 μm; C = 25 μm; D = 10 μm; E–I = 5 μm.

Figure 17

Fig. 17. Fuscidea muskeg (holotype). A, habitus; B, young apothecia with SEM, showing surface of surrounding thallus; C, surface of thallus wart from (B) with SEM; D, surface of excipulum from (B) with SEM, showing short hyphal ‘spines’; E, section of apothecium; F, ascus and ascospores (DIC). Scales: A = 2 mm; B = 200 μm; C & E = 50 μm; D = 20 μm; F = 10 μm.

Figure 18

Fig. 18. Fuscopannaria dillmaniae and species that it may be confused with. A & B, F. dillmaniae, habitus of holotype, from which a DNA sequence was reported as Santessoniella grisea by Schneider et al. (2016); C, a specimen (Tønsberg 24918, BG) reported as Santessoniella grisea from Washington State, USA by Tønsberg & Henssen (1999), and later as a DNA voucher by Ekman et al. (2014), which appears to belong in the genus Rockefellera; D, a specimen (Tønsberg 32520) identified as S. grisea from Alaska (P.M. Jørgensen, unpublished data); E, isotype specimen of Placynthium griseum (W); F, holotype specimen of Pannaria furfurascens (H). Scales: A = 2 mm; B & C = 0.5 mm; D & F = 1 mm; E, mobile phone photograph, no scale bar available.

Figure 19

Fig. 19. Halecania athallina (holotype). A & B, habitus; C, section of apothecium; D, detail showing paraphyses; E–H, ascospores. Scales: A = 1 mm; B = 0.2 mm; C = 50 μm; D–H = 10 μm (scale bar provided only in H).

Figure 20

Fig. 20. Hydropunctaria alaskana. A–C, habitus (A from holotype, B & C from isotype specimens); D, section of perithecium from holotype. Scales: A–C = 1 mm; D = 50 μm.

Figure 21

Fig. 21. Majority-rule consensus tree of the genus Hydropunctaria (Eurotiomycetes) based on ITS and mtSSU loci, showing placement of the new species H. alaskana (bold) relative to previously known species. Values indicate percent bootstrap support. Further voucher information and GenBank Accession numbers are outlined in Table 1 and Supplementary Material Table S3 (available online).

Figure 22

Fig. 22. Lambiella aliphatica (holotype). A & B, habitus; C–E, SEM images of the surface of the apothecium, showing the umbo (C) and perforations in the surface of the umbo (D & E); F, section through apothecium; G, asci, in Lugol's solution; H, thallus cross-section. Scales: A = 1 mm; B = 0.2 mm; C = 100 μm; D = 20 μm; E, G & H = 10 μm; F = 50 μm.

Figure 23

Fig. 23. Lecania hydrophobica (holotype). A & B, habitus; C & D, SEM images of thallus showing (C) film-like covering of medullary hyphae and (D) hyphal coating of thin (<100 nm in diam.) spaghetti-like (wax?) fibrils; E, section through apothecium; F–I, ascospores. Scales: A = 1 mm; B = 0.2 mm; C, F–I = 10 μm; D = 5 μm; E = 20 μm.

Figure 24

Fig. 24. A, Lecanora viridipruinosa, habitus of Spribille 38419; B, an undescribed Lecanora from the L. formosa group found at the type locality of L. viridipruinosa (Spribille 38425). Both specimens are represented in the phylogenetic tree in Fig. 10. Scales: A = 2 mm; B = 1 mm.

Figure 25

Fig. 25. Lecidea griseomarginata (Fryday 9937). A, habitus; B, apothecial section; C, section through hymenium, with asci and ascospores. Scales: A = 0.5 mm; B = 100 μm; C = 10 μm.

Figure 26

Fig. 26. Lecidea streveleri (and putatively related species). A & B, Lecidea streveleri (holotype); C, habitus, Lecidea albofuscescens, (holotype, H-Nyl-20725); D, habitus, Lecidea lesdainii (holotype of Helocarpon corticola, LI-271019); E–G, SEM images of ascospores of (E) L. streveleri (from holotype), (F) L. lesdainii (from holotype of Helocarpon corticola) and (G) L. albofuscescens (from Spribille 36527). Scales: A = 1 mm; B = 200 μm; C & D = 2 mm; E & G = 2 μm; F = 5 μm.

Figure 27

Fig. 27. Lecidea streveleri (anatomical details of apothecium). A, section of apothecium (Spribille 39197); B, z-stack of apothecial section in lactophenol cotton blue, showing putative bacteria in epihymenium; white line indicates break between vertical and perpendicular surfaces (Spribille 39707); C & D, hypothecium in brightfield (C) and polarized (D) light showing upwards contortion and integration of outermost layers of Alnus periderm into the apothecium (arrowed) (Spribille 39707); E–G, asci, in Lugol's solution (E & F, holotype; G, Brodo 11042 [GZU]); H, ascospores (Spribille 39197). Scales: A = 100 μm; B, E–H = 10 μm; C & D = 50 μm.

Figure 28

Fig. 28. Miriquidica gyrizans (holotype). A & B, habitus; C, section through apothecium; D, ascospores in KOH; E, paraphyses in KOH. Scales: A = 1 mm; B = 0.5 mm; C = 50 μm; D & E = 10 μm.

Figure 29

Fig. 29. Niesslia peltigerae (holotype). A, ascomata, dry state collapsed; B, detail of ostiolum; C, periphyses; D, detail of perithecial wall; E, young asci; F, mature ascus; G, detail of a perithecial seta; H & I, ascospores (all except A in water, using DIC). Scales: A = 200 μm; B = 25 μm; C–F = 10 μm; G = 20 μm; H & I = 2 μm.

Figure 30

Fig. 30. Ochrolechia cooperi (holotype). A, habitus (composite image); B, detail of coralloid isidia; C, section of apothecium. Scales: A = 1 mm; B = 200 μm; C = 100 μm.

Figure 31

Fig. 31. Placynthium glaciale (holotype). A, thalli colonizing recently deglaciated rocks (c. 30 cm diam.) at type locality; B & D, habitus; C, detail of apothecium and branches with SEM; E, section of apothecium; F, asci and paraphyses, in Lugol's solution; G–J, ascospores, in K. Scales: B = 1 mm; C & D = 200 μm; E = 100 μm; F–J = 10 μm (scale bar the same for G–J).

Figure 32

Fig. 32. Porpidia seakensis. A–C, habitus (A & B, Fryday 9626; C, holotype); D & F, section through apothecium under brightfield (D) and polarized (F) light; E, asci, ascospores and paraphyses, in KOH (D–F from holotype). Scales: A = 0.5 mm; B = 0.2 mm; C = c. 0.2 mm; D & F = 50 μm; E = 10 μm.

Figure 33

Fig. 33. Rhizocarpon haidense (holotype). A & B, habitus; C & D, section through apothecium under polarized (C) and brightfield (D) light; E, ascospores in ascus, with paraphyses, using DIC microscopy. Scales: A = 5 mm; B = 1 mm; C & D = 50 μm; E = 10 μm.

Figure 34

Fig. 34. Sagiolechia phaeospora (holotype). A, habitus; B, section through apothecium (composite image); C, ascus and immature and mature ascospores; D, overmature ascospores (C & D in Lugol's solution after KOH). Scales: A = c. 1 mm; B = 50 μm; C & D = 10 μm.

Figure 35

Fig. 35. Sclerococcum fissurinae (holotype). A, ascomata on Fissurina thallus; B, transverse section of ascoma; C, detail of excipulum; D, mature ascus with ascospores and paraphyses; E, young ascospore; F & G, mature ascospores (B–H in water and using DIC microscopy). Scales: A = 0.5 mm; B = 50 μm; C = 10 μm; D–G = 5 μm.

Figure 36

Fig. 36. Spilonema maritimum. A–C, habitus of healthy (A & B) and eroded (C) thalli, indicating in (B) an apothecium (arrow) and pycnidia (asterisks) (A, isotype; B, Fryday 10389; C, Spribille 39589); D–F, details of thallus surface with SEM, including upper (D & E) and lower (F) surfaces (Fryday 10389). Scales: A & C = 1 mm; B = 0.5 mm; D = 200 μm; E = 50 μm; F = 100 μm.

Figure 37

Fig. 37. Anatomical details of the apothecium in Spilonema maritimum (holotype). A, section; B, detail of excipular hyphae; C–E, ascus apical structures in Lugol's solution, at full concentration (C) and while fading (D); E, the same as D but using DIC microscopy; F–H, ascus apical structure in dissipating Lugol's solution, arrows indicate amyloid apical tube. Scales: A = 100 μm; B–H = 10 μm.

Figure 38

Fig. 38. Thelocarpon immersum (holotype). A & B, habitus (arrows indicate ascomata); C & D, section through ascoma under brightfield (C) and polarized (D) light; E, ascospores, in KOH. Scales: A = 1 mm; B = 100 μm; C & D = 50 μm; E = 10 μm.

Figure 39

Fig. 39. Toensbergia blastidiata (holotype). A–C, habitus, thallus with dispersed (A & B) and confluent (C) blastidia; D–F, details of blastidia with SEM. Scales: A = 1 mm; B, C & E = 0.5 mm; D = 200 μm; F = 50 μm.

Figure 40

Fig. 40. Xenonectriella nephromatis (holotype). A, ascomata; B, detail of ascomata; C, transverse section of a perithecium; D, detail of periphyses; E, detail of perithecial wall; F, ascus; G & H, ascospores (C–H in water, using DIC microscopy). Scales: A = 1 mm; B = 250 μm; C = 100 μm; D = 25 μm; E & F = 10 μm; G & H = 2.5 μm.

Figure 41

Fig. 41. Absconditella rosea (Spribille 39168). A & B, habitus; C, section of apothecium and thallus with fragments of bryophyte material, in Lugol's solution; D, ascospores, asci and paraphyses, in Lugol's solution after pretreatment with K. Scales: A = 1 mm; B = 100 μm; C = 50 μm; D = 10 μm.

Figure 42

Fig. 42. Lecanora alaskensis. A & B, habitus; C & D, section through apothecium under brightfield (C) and polarized (D) light; E, asci containing immature ascospores, in Lugol's solution; F, thallus granule, with SEM; G, surface of thallus granule with SEM, showing extrusion of wax-like fibrils. Scales: A = 1 mm; B = 200 μm; C, D & F = 100 μm; E = 10 μm; G = 1 μm. A, E, F & G from Dillman 714a (TNFS); B–D from Tønsberg 41794 (BG).

Figure 43

Fig. 43. Thin-layer chromatography spot patterns in solvent systems A, B and C for fatty acids in Lepra ophthalmiza (from holotype, H), L. subvelata (from isotype, CANL) and L. panyrga (from Greenland: Poelt & Ullrich s. n., August 1983, GZU).

Figure 44

Fig. 44. Steineropsis alaskana (Mendenhall Glacier, 21 September 2010, Spribille s. n., ALTA). A & B, habit of thallus with apothecia. Scales: A = 2 mm; B = 1 mm.

Supplementary material: File

Spribille et al. supplementary material

Spribille et al. supplementary material

Download Spribille et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.2 MB