Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T12:05:47.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Helminth infection-induced carcinogenesis: spectrometric insights from the liver flukes, Opisthorchis and Fasciola

Subject: Life Science and Biomedicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2020

Maria João Gouveia
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal Center for the Study of Animal Science, CECA-ICETA, University of Porto, Praça Gomes Teixeira, Apartado 55142, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
Maria Y. Pakharukova
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Molecular Mechanisms of Pathological Processes, Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 10 Lavrentiev Avenue, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, 2 Pirogov Street, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
Gabriel Rinaldi
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Immunology & Tropical Medicine, and Research Center for Neglected Diseases of Poverty, School of Medicine & Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., 20037, USA
Viatcheslav A. Mordvinov
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Molecular Mechanisms of Pathological Processes, Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 10 Lavrentiev Avenue, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
Paul J. Brindley
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Immunology & Tropical Medicine, and Research Center for Neglected Diseases of Poverty, School of Medicine & Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., 20037, USA
Fátima Gärtner
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho 45, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
Nuno Vale*
Affiliation:
i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho 45, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal Laboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Drug Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author: Email: nuno.vale@ff.up.pt (N. Vale)

Abstract

Earlier reports revealed oxysterol metabolites of Opisthorchis spp. liver fluke origin conjugated with DNA bases, suggesting that the generation of these DNA-adducts may underlie the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of the infection with these food-borne pathogens. Here, we employed liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to investigate, compare and contrast spectrograms of soluble extracts from Fasciola hepatica adult worms from bile ducts of cattle with those from O. viverrini and O.felineus from experimentally infected hamsters. F. hepatica and Opisthorchis spp. shared common compounds including oxysterol-like metabolites, bile acids and DNA-adducts, but the spectrometric profiles of F. hepatica included far fewer compounds than Opisthorchis species. These findings support the postulate that parasitic oxysterol-like metabolites could be related to carcinogenesis associated to infection and they point to a molecular basis for the differences among major groups of liver flukes concerning infection-induced malignancy.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Result type: Novel result
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Comparison of mass spectral profiles obtained for Fasciola hepatica and Opisthorchis spp. Panel A, common m/z between the three liver flukes; panel B, major differences among the liver flukes.

Figure 1

Table 1. Comparison of mass/charge (m/z) obtained for Fasciola hepatica during this study with Opisthorchis spp. previously reported for O. viverrini (Gouveia et al., 2017; Vale et al., 2013) and O. felineus (Gouveia et al., 2017). The structures of common m/z (signed at green) are depicted on Table 2.

Figure 2

Table 2. Structures of m/z common to Fasciola hepatica and Opisthorchis species.

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Adult liver flukes O. viverrini and O. felineus produces oxysterol-like metabolites that interact with host chromosomal DNA to form DNA-adducts and forms of biliary intraepithelial neoplasia that conducive to cholangiocarcinoma. F. hepatica also elaborates oxysterol-like metabolites, but at much lower number, which might be explain, at least in part, why infection with this parasite fails to induce malignancy.

Reviewing editor:  Martin Michaelis University of Kent, School of Biosciences, Canterbury, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, CT2 7NJ
This article has been accepted because it is deemed to be scientifically sound, has the correct controls, has appropriate methodology and is statistically valid, and met required revisions.

Review 1: Helminth infection-induced carcinogenesis: spectrometric insights from the liver flukes, Opisthorchis and Fasciola

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to the Author: This works is designed to compare the spectrometric profiles of soluble extracts from F. hepatica, O. viverrini and O. felineus. The authors found 3 common compounds: oxysterol-like metabolites, bile acids and DNA-adducts.

They believe the first compound related to carcinogenesis. The findings are interesting and could explain the different/ common pathogenesis caused by these flukes. However some points should be revised or clarified.

- Fig. 2 : Because the carcinogenesis is multistage-multistep process, other important factors should be added in the diagram.

- Does the host spp. affect the results? F. hepatica adult worms are from natural host but O. viverrini and O. felineus worms are from animal model.

Presentation

Overall score 4.4 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
4 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
5 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
4 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
3 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 3.8 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
4 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
4 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
3 out of 5

Review 2: Helminth infection-induced carcinogenesis: spectrometric insights from the liver flukes, Opisthorchis and Fasciola

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to the Author: Please discuss the basis for suspected association between fascioliasis and carcinogenesis. Include the initial similarity in life processes and metabolism shown by Fasciola spp and Opisthorchis spp before they diverge with the Opisthorchis becoming carcinogenic and the Fasciola otherwise. Take note of the comments cited in the manuscript.

Presentation

Overall score 4 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
4 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
4 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
4 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
4 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 4 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
4 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
4 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
4 out of 5