Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T08:22:20.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NEW PROPERTIES OF THE TOTAL TIME ON TEST TRANSFORM ORDER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2011

Taizhong Hu ,
Yashi Wang  and
Weiwei Zhuang
Taizhong Hu
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Finance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, People's Republic of China E-mail: thu@ustc.edu.cn
Yashi Wang
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, People's Republic of Chinaand Department of Science and Technology, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, 100027, China
Weiwei Zhuang
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Finance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, People's Republic of China E-mail: weizh@ustc.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The total time on test transform (ttt) order was introduced in Kochar, Li, and Shaked (2002) for nonnegative random variables, which has a close connection to the location independent riskier and the excess wealth orders. In this article, the ttt order is redefined for comparing not necessarily nonnegative random variables. Such an extension will lead us to conveniently derive several new intrinsic properties of the ttt order. In particular, we establish an interesting separation result on the connection between the ttt and the excess wealth orders. As two applications of this separation result, we obtain the generating process of the ttt order in terms of mean-decreasing right stretches and the closure property of the ttt order under convolutions. The generating process of the ttt order parallels those of the location independent riskier and the excess wealth orders established by Landsberger and Meilijson (1994).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 43 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Barlow, R.E., Bartholomew, D.J., Bremner, J.M., & Brunk, H.D. (1972). Statistical inference under order restrictions. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
2.Barlow, R.E. & Campo, R. (1975). Total time on test processes and applications to failure data analyses. In Reliability and fault tree analyses. Barlow, R.E., Fussell, J.B., & Singpurwalla, N.D. (eds.), Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp. 451–481.Google Scholar
3.Barlow, R.E. & Proschan, F. (1975). Statistical theory of reliability and life testing. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
4.Belzunce, F. (1999). On a characterization of right spread order by the increasing convex order. Statistics and Probability Letters 45: 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Block, H.W., Savits, T.H., & Singh, H. (1998). The reversed hazard rate function. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 12: 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Chateauneuf, A., Cohen, M., & Meilijson, I. (2004). Four notions of mean-preserving increase in risk, risk attitudes and applications to the rank-dependent expected utility model. Journal of Mathematical Economics 40: 547–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Denuit, M., Dhaene, J., Goovaerts, M.J., & Kaas, R. (2005). Actuarial theory for dependent risks: Measures, orders and models. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Dharmadhikari, S. & Joag-dev, K. (1988). Unimodality, convexity and applications. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
9.Fagiuoli, E., Pellerey, F., & Shaked, M. (1999). A characterization of the dilation order and its applications. Statistical Papers 40: 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Fernández-Ponce, J.M., Kochar, S.C., & Muñoz-Pérez, J. (1998). Partial orderings of distributions based on right spread functions. Journal of Applied Probability 35: 221–228.Google Scholar
11.Hu, T., Chen, J., & Yao, J. (2006). Preservation of the location independent risk order under convolution. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 38: 406–412.Google Scholar
12.Jewitt, I. (1989). Choosing between risky prospects: The characterization of comparative statics results, and location independent risk. Management Science 35: 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Kochar, S.C. & Carrière, K.C. (1997). Connections among various variability orderings. Statistics and Probability Letters 35: 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Kochar, S.C, Li, X., & Shaked, M. (2002). The total time on test transform and the excess wealth stochastic orders of distributions. Advances in Applied Probability 34: 826–845.Google Scholar
15.Kochar, S.C., Li, X., & Xu, M. (2007). Excess wealth order and sample spacings. Statistical Methodology 4: 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Landsberger, M. & Meilijson, I. (1994). The generating process and an extension of Jewitt's location independent risk concept. Management Science 40: 662–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Li, X. & Wang, S. (2003). Some closure properties of the location independent riskier order. Chinese Journal of Applied Probability and Statistics 19: 401–407.Google Scholar
18.Makowski, A.M. (1994). On an elementary characterization of the increasing convex ordering, with an application. Journal of Applied Probability 31: 834–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Müller, A. (1996). Orderings of risks: A comparative study via stop-loss transforms. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 17: 215–222.Google Scholar
20.Müller, A. (1998). Comparing risks with unbounded distributions. Journal of Mathematical Economics 30: 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Müller, A. & Rüschendorf, L. (2001). On the optimal stopping values induced by general dependence structures. Journal of Applied Probability 38: 672–684.Google Scholar
22.Müller, A. & Stoyan, D. (2002). Comparison methods for stochastic models and risks. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
23.Scarsini, M. (1994). Comparing risk and risk aversion, In Stochastic orders and their applications. Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G., (eds.), New York: Academic Press, pp. 351–378.Google Scholar
24.Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G. (1998). Two variability orders. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 12: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G. (2007). Stochastic orders. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Sordo, M.A. (2008). Characterizations of classes of risk measures by dispersive orders. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 42: 1028–1034.Google Scholar
27.Sordo, M.A. (2009). On the relationship of location-independent riskier order to the usual stochastic order. Stochastics and Probability Letters 79: 155–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Sordo, M.A. & Ramos, H.M. (2007). Characterization of stochastic orders by L-functionals. Statistical Papers 48: 249–263.Google Scholar