The intestinal microbiota performs important metabolic and immunological functions and acts as a biological barrier against pathogens. Its composition has been found to vary with age. Initially sterile, the gastrointestinal tract of newborn is rapidly colonised by bacteria from both maternal vaginal and faecal microbiotas and the surrounding environment through a complex process(Reference Waligora-Dupriet, Campeotto and Nicolis1). The microbial ecology of the infant gut is influenced by diet among other environmental and genetic factors. It is generally believed that breastfed infants have a microbiota dominated by bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, creating a protective environment against pathogens(Reference Mata, Kronmal and Garcia2). Formula-fed infants with a more complex microbiota are more susceptible to intestinal disorders(Reference Mountzouris, McCartney and Gibson3). Human milk contains high levels of oligosaccharides that stimulate the growth of indigenous bifidobacteria and lactobacilli and may contribute to the protection of breast-fed infants against infections and inflammations(Reference Kunz and Rudloff4, Reference Kunz and Rudloff5). There is great interest to develop new infant formula sustaining gut microbiota akin to breast-fed infants.
Dietary modulation of the gut microbiota by probiotics and prebiotics is an important feature in nutritional sciences. A prebiotic is a selective fermented ingredient that promotes specific changes, both in the composition and/or activity of the gastrointestinal microbiota that confers benefits upon host well being and health(Reference Macfarlane, Steed and Macfarlane6). Inulin and oligofructose have been shown to inhibit growth of pathogens and to display a bifidogenic effect associated with a decrease in Bacteroides spp. and clostridia counts. These two β(2-1) fructans differ according to their degree of polymerisation (DP). Inulin produced by extraction from chicory roots has a DP between 3 and 60, while oligofructose presenting a DP between 2 and 10 is obtained from inulin hydrolysis(Reference Roberfroid7). The bifidogenic nature of fructans is partly explained by the higher competitiveness that most bifidobacterial strains exhibit over other intestinal bacteria(Reference Michel8). The DP was a determining factor in Bifidobacterium metabolism of fructans(Reference Perrin, Fougnies and Grill9). Generally, as chain length increased, the consumption of fructans by bifidobacteria decreased. Distinct preferences for chain length were observed according to bifidobacteria strains(Reference Rossi, Corradini and Amaretti10–Reference Le Blay, Michel and Blottière12). Specific enzymatic systems allowing hydrolysis of oligofructose only, inulin only or both could explain these differences(Reference Rossi, Corradini and Amaretti10).
Prebiotics' effects have been extensively studied in animals(Reference Le Blay, Michel and Blottière12–Reference Demigné, Jacobs and Moundras14) and healthy adults(Reference Ramirez-Farias, Slezak and Fuller11, Reference Kolida and Gibson15, Reference Kruse, Kleessen and Blaut16), but in vitro models may offer an interesting alternative since they are generally inexpensive to operate, easy to set up with no ethical needs(Reference Macfarlane and Macfarlane17) and provide a dynamic overview of gut microbial activity and composition over several weeks. Effects of soluble and insoluble fibres have already been studied on the adult gut microbiota using different anaerobic fermentor systems(Reference Van de Wiele, Boon and Possemiers18, Reference Duncan, Scott and Ramsay19), but very few studies have been focused on infant gut microbiota(Reference Cinquin, Le Blay and Fliss20). Indeed, there is no in vitro fermentation model specifically set for formula-fed infant gut microbiota with low bifidobacteria concentrations, although such model would be advantageous for testing substrates for enhancing bifidobacteria concentration.
In the present study, a new in vitro fermentation model with immobilised infant faecal microbiota simulating the proximal colon of a formula-fed baby was established and used to investigate its application to prebiotic fructans. The present model based on recent models developed for simulating weaning infant(Reference Cinquin, Le Blay and Fliss20, Reference Cinquin, Le Blay and Fliss21) and adult(Reference Cleusix, Lacroix and Vollenweider22)was associated with a newly developed feeding medium simulating the ileal chyme reaching the proximal colon of infant below 4 month-old fed with a standard infant milk formula. Composition and activity of a formula-fed infant microbiota subjected to four prebiotic substrates were daily monitored during a 71-d continuous fermentation.
Methods
Faeces collection and preparation of the bioreactor inoculum
The faecal sample used for immobilisation was provided by a healthy young (4 month old) male infant fed from birth with a non-prebiotic-supplemented formula (Milupa Aptamil HA1, Milupa GmbH, Friedrichsdorf, Germany) who had never received antibiotics. A fresh faecal sample (11 g) was scraped from the diaper, transferred to a tube containing 5 ml of sterile, pre-reduced peptone water (0·1 %, pH 7), and placed in an anaerobic jar with a CO2 generation system (Oxoid AnaeroGen TM, Oxoid AG, Basel, Switzerland) by the mother just after defecation. The faecal sample was kept in anaerobiosis, on ice and delivered to the laboratory within 1 h. Immediately upon reception, the faecal suspension was weighed and the volume adjusted with reduced peptone water (0·1 %, pH 7) under anaerobic conditions (anaerobic chamber; Coy Laboratories, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) to obtain a final faecal concentration of 20 % (w/v). This inoculum was then homogenised and centrifuged (700 g for 1 min; Biofuge Primo Heraeus, DJB Labcare Ltd, Newport Pagnell, UK) to remove large particles.
Immobilisation technique
After centrifugation, the inoculum was immobilised in 1–2 mm diameter gel beads composed of 2·5 % gellan gum, 0·25 % xanthan gum and 0·2 % sodium citrate (v/w; Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Buchs, Switzerland). This technique is based on a dispersion process in a two-phase system(Reference Van de Wiele, Boon and Possemiers18). Briefly, the polymer solution was autoclaved, cooled to 43°C and inoculated aseptically with the faecal inoculum (2 %). After inoculation, the polymer solution was stirred into freshly autoclaved (15 min at 121°C) commercial rapeseed oil at 43°C to obtain a suspension of aqueous droplets in oil. Gel beads were formed by cooling the suspension. After separation and washing, beads were hardened by soaking for 30 min in CaCl2 (0·1 m). Beads with diameters in the 1·0–2·0 mm range were selected for fermentation by wet sieving. The entire process was completed under anaerobiosis in aseptic conditions within 1 h. Gel beads (60 ml) were then transferred to the bioreactor (Sixfors, Ismatec, Glattbrugg, Switzerland) with 140 ml fresh nutritive medium. The entire procedure from faeces collection to the reactor inoculation was carried out under anaerobic conditions and completed within 3 h after defecation. A bead aliquot (0·5 g) was analysed just after immobilisation for viable counts.
Fermentation media
Two nutritive media were designed to simulate ileal chymes of infants fed with formula supplemented or without prebiotic substrates. Two typical infant formulas used in Europe, with a carbohydrate:N-compounds ratio of 83:17, SANOR 1 ORAF SYNG A (lactose 72 g/l, casein 6 g/l and whey proteins 9 g/l) and SANOR 1 ORAF SYNG B (lactose 67·7 g/l, prebiotic 4·3 g/l, casein 6 g/l and whey proteins 9 g/l; Orafti, personal communication) have been used to calculate the non-prebiotic and prebiotic nutritive media compositions using a similar approach as described in Cinquin et al. (Reference Cinquin, Le Blay and Fliss21) with some modifications. Digestibility indices for lactose (98 %; Kien et al. (Reference Kien, McClead and Cordero23)), casein (98 %; Drescher et al. (Reference Drescher, Roos and Pfeuffer24)), whey proteins (80 %; Lindberg et al. (Reference Lindberg, Engberg and Sjoberg25)) and prebiotics (0 %) (Orafti, personal communication) were applied to each compound in order to obtain new carbohydrate:N-compounds ratios in the non-prebiotic (43:57) and prebiotic (74:26) nutritive media simulating undigested substrates present in infant ileal chymes reaching the proximal colon. The total substrate concentration (carbohydrates and N-compounds) in the non-prebiotic medium was set at 15 g/l leading to new concentrations of lactose (6·4 g/l), casein (0·5 g/l) and whey proteins (8·1 g/l). The concentration of N-compounds (casein plus whey proteins) obtained after calculation for the non-prebiotic medium (8·6 g/l) was kept constant in the prebiotic-supplemented medium. This led to an increase in the total substrate concentration of 32·6 g/l (lactose 6·1 g/l, prebiotic 17·9 g/l, casein 0·5 g/l and whey proteins 8·1 g/l) in the prebiotic-containing medium due to the high proportion of prebiotic theoretically available in the infant ileal chyme. Prebiotic substrates in the present study were provided by Beneo Orafti (Tienen, Belgium). Oligofructose (Orafti® P95, P95) is composed of 95 % oligosaccharides with DP 2–9; oligofructose-enriched inulin (Orafti® Synergy 1, Syn) is composed of 30 % oligosaccharides with DP 2–9 and 70 % inulin with DP ≥ 10; high solubility inulin (HSI, Orafti® HSI) is composed of 60 % oligosaccharides with DP 2–9 and 28 % inulin with DP ≥ 10. Unless otherwise stated, all chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH.
The two nutritive media were supplemented with (g/l of distilled water): ox bile salts (0·05), porcine gastric mucin type (4·0), yeast extract (2·5), hemin (0·01), Tween 80 (1), peptone (0·5), tryptone (0·5), salts (NaCl, 4·5; KCl, 4·5; MgSO4 7H2O, 1·25; CaCl2, 2H2O, 0·15; K2HPO4, 0·5; NaHCO3, 1·5; FeSO4 7H2O, 0·005) and cysteine (0·8). A sterile-filtered vitamin solution was added (0·5 ml/l) separately to the autoclaved (15 min, 121°C) medium (Michel et al. (Reference Michel, Kravtchenko and David26)).
Although less concentrated than in the prebiotic nutritive medium, the amount of substrates in the non-prebiotic medium (15 g/l) was assumed to give sufficient fermentable substrates to sustain physiological bacterial growth (total bacteria in the range from 9 to 10 log colony-forming units (CFU)/ml) and metabolic activity (at least 70 mm total SCFA in fermented medium) simulating an infant colonic microbial ecosystem (Mountzouris et al. (Reference Mountzouris, McCartney and Gibson3)). This reduced level of substrates was also chosen to avoid an excess of fermentable substrates in the prebiotic medium leading to non-physiological values. Prebiotic substrates were provided by Orafti. Unless otherwise stated, all chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH.
Fermentation procedure
For bead colonisation, batch fermentations were first carried out in a bioreactor with a fermentation volume of 200 ml (Sixfors, Ismatec, Glattbrugg, Switzerland) containing 30 % of freshly inoculated beads (v/v). During colonisation (days 1 and 2), the fermented medium was aseptically replaced by fresh medium every 12 h. The reactor was maintained at 37°C, under continuous stirring (120 rpm) and anaerobic conditions by a continuous flow of pure CO2. The pH was adjusted to 6 by the addition of 4 m NaOH. The continuous fermentation was carried out in the same reactor connected to a stirred feedstock vessel containing sterile culture medium continuously flushed with CO2 and maintained at 4°C and to an effluent receiving vessel. Continuous medium feeding was carried out using peristaltic pumps (Reglo analog, Ismatec, Glattbrugg, Switzerland) delivering a feed flow rate of 40 ml/h for a mean retention time in the reactor of 5 h. This time was used to simulate the residence time in infant proximal colon, estimated for a total transit time of 23 h according to Sievers et al. (Reference Sievers, Oldigs and Schulz-Lell27) who described a total transit time ranging from 5·4 to 36·5 h in formula-fed infants aged 113 d. The fermentation was divided into eight test periods (Fig. 1). Four stabilisation periods with the non-prebiotic medium (stab 1–4: 12, 10, 8 and 8 d, respectively) were intercalated with four prebiotic treatment periods for the three substrates to be tested, P95 (8 d), HSI (8 d) and Syn (8 d) including a repetition of the P95 treatment (7 d) at the end of the experiment. During the fermentation experiment, beads were collected on the last day of each treatment period and effluent samples (13 ml) were collected daily. Plating was done immediately after collecting the samples, whereas fixed effluent samples and effluent supernatants were stored at − 80°C for a maximum of 5 months for fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and metabolite analyses according to Cinquin et al. (Reference Cinquin, Le Blay and Fliss28).
Schedule of the experimental colonic fermentation used to test three prebiotic substrates: P95 (oligofructose, Orafti® P95); HSI (inulin, Orafti® HSI); Syn (oligofructose-enriched inulin Orafti® Synergy 1) in the intestinal fermentation model with immobilised infant microbiota (stab: stabilisation periods with the control fermentation medium).
Bacterial enumeration by plate counts
Plate counts on non-selective (Wilkins Chalgren) and selective (Beeren's) media for total anaerobes and bifidobacterial populations, respectively, were performed daily on reactor effluents and on beads at the end of each test period. Major bacterial populations present in faeces and in beads (just after immobilisation and from the last day of stab 1) were enumerated on a panel of non-selective (Wilkins Chalgren and Nutrient Agar) and selective (Beeren's Agar, Lamvab, Reinforced Clostridial Agar, Bacteroides Mineral Salt Agar, MacConkey Agar, Azide Blood Agar and Mannitol Salt Agar) media, as described by Cinquin et al. (Reference Cinquin, Le Blay and Fliss21). Samples were decimally diluted in reduced peptone water (0·1 %, pH 7) under anaerobic conditions (anaerobic chamber; Coy Laboratories), and drops of 20 μl appropriate dilutions were placed in a Petri dish. After drying of the drops, the plates were incubated aerobically or in anaerobic jars at 37°C for up to 5 d. Cell counts were performed in duplicate and expressed as log10 CFU per g (wet weight) of faeces, per ml of fermentation medium or per g (wet weight) gel beads.
Bacterial enumeration by fluorescent in situ hybridisation
Light microscopy was performed after completion of the continuous culture on glass slides with faecal inocula and fermentation samples from the last 4 d of each pseudo steady-state periods (stabilisation and treatment periods), as described by Schwiertz et al. (Reference Schwiertz, Le Blay and Blaut29) and Cinquin et al. (Reference Cinquin, Le Blay and Fliss28). Different oligonucleotide Cy3-labelled probes (Microsynth GmbH, Balgach, Switzerland), with hybridisation conditions (lysozyme treatment, buffers and hybridisation temperatures) specific for each probe as described in Cinquin et al. (Reference Cinquin, Le Blay and Fliss28), were used to detect the main populations: Eub338 for total bacteria(Reference Amann, Ludwig and Schleifer30); Bif164 for Bifidobacterium spp.(Reference Langendijk, Schut and Jansen31); Bac303 for Bacteroides–Prevotella cluster(Reference Manz, Amann and Ludwig32); Lab158 for Lactobacillus and Enterococcus (Reference Harmsen, Elfferich and Welling33), and Erec482 for Clostridium coccoides–Eubacterium rectale group(Reference Franks, Harmsen and Raangs34). For total cell counts, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH) was added at a final concentration of 1 μg/ml Citifluor® (Citifluor Ltd, London, UK), which was used as mounting medium to prevent fading of fluorescence. Cells were counted visually with an Olympus BX 60 epifluorescence microscope (Olympus Schweiz AG, Volketswil, Switzerland) on 10-well slides (Fisher Scientific SA, Wohlen, Switzerland). Bacterial concentrations were calculated from the bacterial density corresponding to fifteen annular regions to minimise the counting error due to the radial distribution of bacteria in wells as already described by Cinquin et al. (Reference Cinquin, Le Blay and Fliss28). Each assay was carried out in duplicate. The detection limit of the method was log 6·0 cell number per ml of fermentation effluents or g of faeces.
Metabolite analyses
HPLC (Hitachi LaChrome, Merck, Dietikon, Switzerland) analyses for SCFA (acetate, propionate, butyrate and formate), iso-acids (iso-butyrate and iso-valerate) and lactate were performed after completion of the continuous culture, with frozen supernatants of the faecal inoculum and fermentation samples (1·5 ml) from the last 4 d of each pseudo steady-state treatment period, as described by Cleusix et al. (Reference Cleusix, Lacroix and Vollenweider22). Ammonia concentration was measured with an ammonia electrode (Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland). All analyses were done in duplicate and expressed in mm.
Statistical analyses
A one-way ANOVA was performed using SPSS 13 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) to test the effects of the different substrates on bacterial populations and metabolite production during the last 4 d of the pseudo steady-state periods. When significant differences were found below the probability level of 0·05, treatment means were compared using the Tukey–Kramer's honestly significant difference test.
Results
Immobilisation, bacterial diversity and stability
Bacterial populations measured by plate counts in faeces and in beads just after immobilisation and at the end of stab 1 are presented in Table 1. Population of bifidobacteria enumerated in faeces used to inoculate the reactor was 6·2 log CFU/g faeces, 9·9 log CFU/g faeces for clostridia and 9·7 log CFU/g faeces for gram-positive cocci. Immediately after immobilisation, all bacterial populations tested were detected in beads at lower concentrations than in faeces. They showed survival rates between 25 and 157 %, with the exception of Clostridium spp. and gram-positive cocci showing only 1 and 4 % of cells surviving bead entrapment. At the end of stab 1, beads were highly colonised by bacteria. Concentrations close to the faecal ones with differences ranging from 0·2 to 0·7 log units were obtained for most populations. Clostridia and bacteroides presented, however, a lower (by 1·4 log units) and a much higher (by 3·2 log units) concentration in beads than in the infant faeces. These results were confirmed on faecal and effluent sample populations analysed with the FISH technique (Table 2). Major bacterial groups recovered in faeces were also present in effluent samples and reached high and stable values with standard deviations equal or below 0·3 units for four consecutive days at the end of stab 1.
Viable bacterial populations measured with plate counts in faeces (log colony-forming units (CFU)/g) and in beads (log CFU/g) just after immobilisation and at the end of the first pseudo-steady state stabilisation period of the continuous colonic fermentation
Reported data are means of duplicate plating of single sample of faeces or beads (n 1). Immo, immobilisation; stab1, first stabilisation period.
* Calculated by the ratio of cell count in beads after Immo to theoretical cell count in beads with 100 % cell survival. Theoretical cell count in beads was calculated considering a fivefold dilution from faeces to faecal cell suspension and 2 % bead inoculation with faecal cell suspension.
Bacterial populations in beads and effluent samples during the continuous fermentation
Stab 1–4, stabilisation periods with the non-prebiotic medium; P95, medium supplemented with oligofructose (Orafti® P95); HSI, medium supplemented with high solubility inulin (Orafti® HSI); Syn, medium supplemented with oligofructose enriched-inulin (Orafti® Synergy 1); FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation; CFU, colony-forming units.
a,b,c,d Mean values with different superscript letters in a row are significantly different with Tukey–Kramer's honestly significant difference test (P < 0·05).
* Total anaerobes and bifidobacteria concentrations analysed by plate counts in faeces (log CFU/g, n 1), beads at the end of each treatment period (log CFU/g, n 1) and effluent samples during the last 4 d of each treatment period (log CFU/ml ± STDEW, n 4).
† Bacterial populations measured by FISH in faeces (log cell number/g faeces ± STDEW) and in effluent samples (log cell number/ml ± STDEW) at the end of each treatment period (n 4).
Effect of prebiotics on bacterial populations enumerated with plate counts
Concentrations of total anaerobes and bifidobacteria were monitored in beads (at the end of each stabilisation period) and effluent samples (daily) by plate counts during the whole fermentation (Table 2 and Fig. 2). Total anaerobe concentrations were high and stable, with general means of 10·1 (sd 0·2) log CFU/g and 9·6 (sd 0·3) log CFU/ml in beads and effluent samples, respectively. In contrast, bifidobacterial concentrations were strongly (P < 0·05) increased during the four prebiotic treatments compared to the preceding stabilisation periods (Table 2). In effluent samples, the bifidobacterial concentrations obtained during P95 treatments (first and second) were significantly higher (P < 0·05) than those obtained with HSI, which were not different from Syn. These findings were confirmed in beads, which showed the same trends (Table 2). An increase in bifidobacteria counts in effluent samples over the 71 d of fermentation led to significantly lower and higher concentrations in stab 1 and stab 4 (5·6 and 8·0 log CFU/ml, respectively) compared with stab 2 and stab 3 (7·1 and 7·0 log CFU/ml, respectively). This makes comparison of P95 with the two other prebiotics (HSI and Syn) treatments difficult.
Changes in total anaerobes and bifidobacteria concentrations in effluent fermentation samples during the continuous fermentation. Total anaerobes (○), bifidobacteria (●). Stab 1–4, stabilisation periods with the non-prebiotic medium; P95, medium supplemented with oligofructose (Orafti® P95); HSI, medium supplemented with inulin (Orafti® HSI); Syn, medium supplemented with oligofructose enriched-inulin (Orafti® Synergy 1); CFU, colony-forming units.
Effect of prebiotics on bacterial populations enumerated with fluorescence in situ hybridisation
Bacterial populations were enumerated with FISH microscopy in effluent samples only (Table 2). The total bacterial population was high and stable over the whole fermentation (9·8 (sd 0·2) log cell number/ml). Bifidobacteria were significantly increased by 1·8 log units during P95 (first treatment) and 1·0–1·1 log units during the other three prebiotic treatments (HSI, Syn and P95 second treatment) compared to the preceding stabilisation periods. No significant differences were detected for bifidobacterial concentrations between P95 (first treatment), HSI and Syn with mean values of 8·0 (sd 0·1), 8·0 (sd 0·1) and 8·1 (sd 0·1) log cell number/ml, respectively. P95 (second treatment) induced a significantly higher bifidobacterial concentration (8·5 (sd 0·2) log cell number/ml) compared with the three first treatments (P95, HSI and Syn). As observed with plate counts, bifidobacterial concentrations measured with FISH gradually increased from stab 1 to stab 4, but to a lesser extent. It should be noted that bifidobacterial concentrations obtained with plate counts were systematically higher (plus 0·3–1·1 log units) than data obtained with FISH analyses during the four prebiotic treatments.
In contrast to bifidobacteria, C. coccoides–E. rectale group and Bacteroides–Prevotella cluster slightly decreased during prebiotic treatments compared to the previous stabilisation periods. These decreases were significant (P < 0·05) for Bacteroides–Prevotella cluster during P95 (first treatment) and HSI, and for the C. coccoides–E. rectale group during Syn and P95 (second treatment). No effect was observed on the lactobacilli–enterococci counts, with a mean of 9·1 (sd 0·2) log cell number/ml over the whole fermentation.
Effect of prebiotic substrates on metabolic activities
SCFA, iso-acids, lactate and ammonia concentrations were analysed in faeces and in effluent samples during the whole fermentation trial, and means were calculated for the last 4 d of each treatment period. The total SCFA concentration (90·3 mm) measured in the faecal sample was divided into 61 % acetate, 34 % propionate and 5 % butyrate. Similar concentrations for total SCFA were tested during the four stabilisation periods (ranging from 79 to 88 mm), but with different SCFA ratios (Table 3). The percentage of butyrate increased (19·0 (sd 2·4) %) and that of acetate decreased ( − 20·5 (sd 3·1) %) compared to faeces whereas the percentages of propionate and formate remained constant. Iso-acids and ammonia concentrations were high in the range from 13 to 15 mm and from 64 to 74 mm, respectively. There were no significant differences between the four stabilisation periods for all parameter analysed, showing that the system was stable and suggesting that different treatments can be compared within the same fermentation experiment.
(Mean values and standard deviations of four samples)
Stab 1–4, stabilisation periods with the non-prebiotic medium; P95, medium supplemented with oligofructose (Orafti® P95); HSI, medium supplemented with high solubility inulin (Orafti® HSI); Syn, medium supplemented with oligofructose enriched-inulin (Orafti® Synergy 1); nd, not detected; ND, not determined.
a,b,c,d Mean values with different superscript letters in a row are significantly different with Tukey–Kramer honestly significant difference test (P < 0·05).
* Reported data of four samples harvested during the last 4 d of each period are expressed in mm.
† Defined as the sum of formate, acetate, propionate and butyrate.
‡ Defined as the sum of iso-valerate and iso-butyrate.
P95 and HSI, and Syn to a lesser extent, increased (P < 0·05) the fermentation capacity of the microbiota. The acetate ratio largely increased, whereas propionate and butyrate ratios decreased during prebiotic treatments (Table 3). These increases in SCFA production were concomitant with a decrease in ammonia and iso-acid concentrations and an increase in formate concentrations. The dynamic effect of prebiotics on SCFA concentrations is presented in Fig. 3 with a rapid increase in acetate concentration followed by a transient increase in lactate concentration, except for P95 (first treatment) where no increase in lactate concentration was observed.
Changes in metabolite concentrations (mm) in faeces and fermentation medium for different times and fermentation periods. Acetate (○), propionate (▲), butyrate (Δ), lactate (●) and total SCFA (□) concentrations (mm) in the faecal inoculum and fermentation medium. Stab 1–4, stabilisation periods with the non-prebiotic medium; P95, medium supplemented with oligofructose (Orafti® P95); HSI, medium supplemented with inulin (Orafti® HSI); Syn, medium supplemented with oligofructose enriched-inulin (Orafti® Synergy 1).
Discussion
In the present study, we tested the effects of three different fructans (oligofructose, oligofructose-enriched inulin and inulin) during the same colonic fermentation performed with a new fermentation model simulating the proximal colon of a young formula-fed infant.
The faecal sample obtained from a 4-month-old, 100 % formula-fed baby harboured high clostridia and bacteroides and low bifidobacteria concentrations with a SCFA profile dominated by acetic and propionic acids with no lactic acid and a low level of butyric acid, which is commonly met in formula-fed infants(Reference Mountzouris, McCartney and Gibson3, Reference Edwards and Parrett35). As already observed in a previous study (Cinquin et al. (Reference Cinquin, Le Blay and Fliss21)), immobilisation allowed the recovery of the main bacterial populations. All major groups of intestinal bacteria found in faeces were present in beads and effluent samples and reached stable and similar values as in faeces at the end of the first stabilisation period.
During the four stabilisation periods, bacterial populations with highest numbers in reactor effluents were the Bacteroides–Prevotella cluster and C. coccoides–E. rectale group, which belong to the dominant populations of formula-fed infants, as described by Edwards & Parrett(Reference Edwards and Parrett35) and Harmsen et al. (Reference Harmsen, Wildeboer-Veloo and Raangs36). Lactobacilli and/or enterococci, detected with the oligonucleotide probe Lab158, were also present in high numbers. Contrary to infant faeces and literature data (Edwars & Parett(Reference Edwards and Parrett35)), the butyrate percentages for the different stabilisation periods simulating a formula-fed baby were very high (22–27 %). This was likely a result of the high concentration of C. coccoides–E. rectale group, which harbours a high proportion of butyrate-producing bacteria(Reference Barcenilla, Pryde and Martin37).
Our data for the selected medium composition and fermentation conditions (pH 6, mean retention time of 5 h) fully met initial assumptions for total anaerobes and bifidobacteria concentrations (in the range from 109 to 1010 CFU/ml and below 109 CFU/ml, respectively) and metabolic activity (at least 70 mm SCFA in the fermentation medium) in the infant model. The reduced amount of substrates (15 g/l) in the control non-prebiotic medium provided a sufficient source of fermentable substrates to allow bacterial growth and metabolic activity comparable to that of an infant microbiota. These results on total bacterial and total metabolite concentrations measured in reactor effluents during the four stabilisation periods were in accordance with physiological values of the proximal colon of a 4-month-old formula-fed infant (total anaerobes of 8·5–10·5 log CFU/g faeces(Reference Schwiertz, Le Blay and Blaut29) and total SCFA concentrations of approximately 70–130 mmol/kg faeces according to Mountzouris et al. (Reference Mountzouris, McCartney and Gibson3)). Lactobacilli and/or enterococci, detected with oligonucleotide probe Lab158, were also present in high numbers. There were no significant differences among the four different stabilisation periods concerning bacterial and metabolite concentrations in effluent samples from the last 4 d of each period, except a progressive increase in bifidobacterial concentrations, which can be explained by additional colonisation of beads with bifidobacteria during prebiotic periods. To improve the accuracy of the comparison and limit this bifidobacteria counts drift in beads during successive prebiotic and stabilisation periods, it may prove useful to first increase the bifidobacterial concentration in colonised beads using a chyme-simulating medium supplemented with a prebiotic substrate, and then change the composition of the medium to produce low bifidobacteria counts in the effluent medium during stabilisation periods for comparison with prebiotic treatments. However, our present data show the good stability of the colonic model and indicate the validity of the comparison between successive treatments applied during the same fermentation experiments.
Bacteria enumeration with FISH and plate counts for total anaerobes and bifidobacteria gave similar results (Table 2). A significant increase (P < 0·05) in the bifidobacterial population was observed with both methods in reactor effluents for the three fructans studied to the preceding stabilisation periods, while the total anaerobes remained high and stable. Significant differences in bifidobacterial concentrations were, however, observed between the methods. The differences between FISH and plate counts may be due to different species being targeted by the two methods(Reference Cinquin, Le Blay and Fliss21, Reference Langendijk, Schut and Jansen31). Bifidobacterium adolescentis population has been stimulated by inulin supplementation in a recent study(Reference Ramirez-Farias, Slezak and Fuller11), but media for bifidobacteria such as Beeren's underestimate the number of B. adolescentis (Reference Apajalahti, Kettunen and Nurminen38). By contrast, bifidobacterial concentrations were sometimes found higher with plate counts than by FISH analysis, and selectivity of all media for bifidobacteria can be questioned(Reference Hartemink and Rombouts39).
The increase in bifidobacterial counts between prebiotic treatments and preceding stabilisation periods ranged from 1·0 to 3·2 log units, depending on the method of analysis and prebiotic treatment. The greatest increase was observed for the first P95 treatment, independent from the method of analysis. This is explained likely by the low counts of bifidobacteria measured during stab 1 compared with the other stabilisation periods. There is a stronger bifidogenic effect of prebiotics for low initial levels of bifidobacteria(Reference Rycroft, Jones and Gibson40). But this difference could be also explained by the different DP distribution of P95 since oligofructose could have a stronger effect(Reference Kleessen, Hartmann and Blaut13)or a more rapid effect on bifidobacteria increase than HSI(Reference Stewart, Timm and Slavin41, Reference Pompei, Cordisco and Raimondi42). Indeed, long-chain fructans with DP>10 are fermented on average half as fast as short-chain fructans with DP < 10(Reference Roberfroid, Van Loo and Gibson43). For all other prebiotic treatments (P95, Syn and HSI), the increase in bifidobacterial counts was similar when analysed by FISH.
Lactobacilli can also increase with prebiotics, whereas bacteroides and clostridia may decrease(Reference Le Blay, Michel and Blottière12, Reference Gibson and Wang44, Reference Macfarlane, Macfarlane and Cummings45). Data obtained for reactor effluents analysed with FISH showed a decrease in Bacteroides–Prevotella cluster and C. coccoides–E. rectale group with prebiotic treatments (although not statistically significant for all treatments). There was no significant increase in the lactobacilli–enterococci populations for any of the prebiotic substrates tested.
As expected, all four prebiotic treatments significantly increased SCFA production and decreased ammonia compared to stabilisation periods. This can be explained by the large change of carbohydrates:N-compounds ratio between prebiotic and control treatments with about four times higher carbohydrate concentrations during prebiotic treatments in the feeding medium(Reference Le Blay, Michel and Blottière12, Reference Cinquin, Le Blay and Fliss28, Reference Gibson and Wang44). DP distribution did not influence the prebiotic effect of substrates in the present study contrary to Van de Wiele et al. (Reference Van de Wiele, Boon and Possemiers18)who suggested a more pronounced in vitro prebiotic effect of fructans of longer DP. Butyrate concentrations significantly increased during prebiotic treatments, except for Syn. However, in the present study, the increase in butyrate was not specific, but due to a general increase in the fermentation activity. No increase in the butyrate ratio was observed during prebiotic treatments, probably due to an already high butyrate concentration (and ratio) present during stabilisation periods or the transformation of lactate into propionate instead of butyrate(Reference Le Blay, Michel and Blottière12, Reference Duncan, Louis and Flint46). Lactate, as a transient metabolite, was primarily produced during the first days of the prebiotic treatments (except during the first prebiotic treatment with P95), which is typical for a fast fermentation and is probably due to a rapid increase in bifidobacteria. After a few days, the lactate-utilising bacteria colonise the infant gut and lactate decreased together with an increase in propionate. This was likely due to the fermentation of lactate to propionate and acetate at a ratio of 2:1, which can be done by many bacteria such as Propionibacterium spp., Veillonella spp. or Clostridium spp.(Reference Seeliger, Janssen and Schink47).
In conclusion, the present study showed that the in vitro colonic model with immobilised infant microbiota can be used to study several prebiotic substrates in the same trial with the same microbiota. All three prebiotic substrates led to significant increases in the bifidobacterial population and in metabolite production. We conclude that the established in vitro model is valid to test effects of fibre-type substrates on the infant gut flora and could be a powerful model to study diet modulation on the formula-fed infant microbiota.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Beneo Orafti (Tienen, Belgium) for supplying the prebiotic substrates and financial support. G. L.-B. designed, conducted, analysed the study and drafted the paper. C. L. designed and supervised the study along with drafting the manuscript. S. B. conducted experiments and C. C. analysed data and drafted the paper.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
