Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-45ctf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-19T18:33:16.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Value Commitments, Value Conflict, and the Separability of Belief and Value

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Isaac Levi*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Columbia University

Abstract

Leeds (1990) levels an objection against the criterion of rational choice I have proposed (Levi 1997, Ch. 6; 1980; 1986), pointing out that the criterion is sensitive to the way possible consequences are partitioned. Seidenfeld, Kadane and Schervish (1989) call into question the defense of the cross product rule by appeal to Pareto Unanimity Principles that I had invoked in my 1986. I offer clarifications of my proposals showing that the difference between my views and those of my critics concerns the extent to which full belief, probabilistic belief, and value judgment are separable.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable