Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-46n74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T02:16:01.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cross-generational feeding of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis)-maize to zebrafish (Danio rerio) showed no adverse effects on the parental or offspring generations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2013

Monica Sanden*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), PO Box 2029, Nordnes, 5817Bergen, Norway
Robin Ornsrud
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), PO Box 2029, Nordnes, 5817Bergen, Norway
Nini H. Sissener
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), PO Box 2029, Nordnes, 5817Bergen, Norway
Susanne Jorgensen
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), PO Box 2029, Nordnes, 5817Bergen, Norway
Jinni Gu
Affiliation:
Department of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, Aquaculture Protein Centre (a CoE), Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, PO Box 8146 Dep, N-0033Oslo, Norway
Anne Marie Bakke
Affiliation:
Department of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, Aquaculture Protein Centre (a CoE), Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, PO Box 8146 Dep, N-0033Oslo, Norway
Gro-Ingunn Hemre
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), PO Box 2029, Nordnes, 5817Bergen, Norway
*
*Corresponding author: M. Sanden, fax +47 55 90 52 9, email monica.sanden@nifes.no
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the present study, zebrafish (Danio rerio) were fed casein/gelatin-based diets containing either 19 % Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis)-maize or its parental non-Bt (nBt)-maize control for two generations (F0: sixty fish; F1: forty-two to seventy fish per treatment). The study focused on growth and reproductive performance, liver CuZn superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzyme activity, gene transcript levels targeting important cellular pathways in the liver and mid-intestine, histomorphological evaluation of the intestine, differential leucocyte counts, offspring larva swimming activity and global DNA methylation in offspring embryos. No significant effects were observed in the parental generation. The offspring were either fed the same diets as those fed to their parents (BtBt or nBtnBt) or switched from the Bt diet to the nBt diet (BtnBt). The BtBt offspring exhibited a significantly higher body mass increase, specific growth rate and feed utilisation than fish fed the nBtnBt diet and/or fish fed the BtnBt diet. Liver and mid-intestinal gene transcript levels of CuZn SOD were significantly higher in fish fed the nBtnBt diet than in those fed the BtBt diet. Liver gene transcript levels of caspase 6 were significantly lower for the nBtnBt group than for the BtBt group. Overall, enhanced growth performance was observed in fish fed the Bt diet for two generations than in those fed the nBt diet for one and two generations. Effects observed on gene biomarkers for oxidative stress and the cell cycle (apoptosis) may be related to the contamination of nBt-maize with fumonisin B1 and aflatoxin B1. In conclusion, it is suggested that Bt-maize is as safe and nutritious as its nBt control when fed to zebrafish for two generations.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 
Figure 0

Table 1 Formulation and proximate composition of the experimental diets including the content of mycotoxins, the presence of the crystal protein 1Ab (Cry1Ab) protein and pesticide residues

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Overview of the experimental design, time of sampling and age (days post-hatch; dph) of the zebrafish in the feeding trial. The parental zebrafish were fed Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis)-maize or nBt (non-Bt)-maize diets (n 3) for 45 and 283 d. The offspring generation (F1) were fed the same diets as those fed to their parents, BtBt-maize (n 4) or nBtnBt-maize (n 5), or cross-over BtnBt-maize (n 3) for 45 d. Data on parent fish (F0) fecundity were collected between 175 and 300 dph. F1 embryos (51 h post-fertilisation) and F1 larvae (4 dph) were collected for epigenetic analysis and swimming activity measurements, respectively.

Figure 2

Table 2 Primer pair sequences and GenBank accession numbers for genes used for quantitative real-time PCR

Figure 3

Table 3 Growth performance parameters and mean normalised expression (MNE) of genes in the mid-intestine of the parental zebrafish (F0) fed the nBt (non-Bacillus thuringiensis)-maize and Bt-maize diets for 45 d (Means with their standard errors (growth data: ten fish per tank; gene transcript data: two to three fish per tank; n 3 per diet))

Figure 4

Table 4 Differential counts of leucocytes (granulocytes, monocytes and lymphocytes) and growth performance parameters including liver CuZn superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity of parental zebrafish fed the nBt (non-Bacillus thuringiensis)-maize and Bt-maize diets for 45 d (F0, parental generation) and 283 d (F0 generation), respectively (Mean values and 95 % confidence intervals (blood health data: six to eight fish per diet; growth data: ten to eleven fish per diet))

Figure 5

Table 5 Reproductive parameters of the parental generation (F0) fed the two experimental diets (nBt (non-Bacillus thuringiensis)-maize or Bt-maize) as assessed by fecundity, embryo DNA methylation (F1) given as percentage occurrence of 5-methylcytosine in offspring zebrafish embryos (51 h post-fertilisation) and larva swimming activity (F1) given as a percentage of burst duration (Mean values and 95 % confidence intervals)

Figure 6

Table 6 Growth performance parameters and mean normalised expression (MNE) of gene transcripts in the mid-intestine and liver of offspring zebrafish (F1) fed the three dietary regimens for 45 d: Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis)-maize diet-fed offspring from the Bt-maize diet-fed parents (BtBt, n 4), non-Bt (nBt)-maize diet-fed offspring from the Bt-maize diet-fed parents (BtnBt, n 3) and nBt-maize diet-fed offspring from the nBt-maize diet-fed parents (nBtnBt, n 5) (Mean values with their standard errors (growth data: fourteen fish per tank; gene transcript data: six fish per tank))

Figure 7

Table 7 Morphological evaluation of the intestines sampled from the offspring generation (F1): nBt (non-Bacillus thuringiensis)-maize diet-fed offspring from the nBt-maize diet-fed parents (nBtnBt; ten fish), nBt-maize diet-fed offspring from the Bt-maize diet-fed parents (BtnBt; eight fish) and Bt-maize diet-fed offspring from the Bt-maize diet-fed parents (BtBt; six fish)*

Figure 8

Fig. 2 Histological details of the (a, b) proximal and (c, d) mid-intestinal regions of the offspring zebrafish (F1) fed the three dietary regimens for 45 d: Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis)-maize diet-fed offspring from the Bt-maize diet-fed parents (BtBt); non-Bt (nBt)-maize diet-fed offspring from the Bt-maize diet-fed parents (BtnBt); nBt-maize diet-fed offspring from the nBt-maize diet-fed parents (nBtnBt). Compared with the normal morphological structure of proximal intestine (a), a few of the fish (see Table 6) exhibited slight changes (b) with widened lamina propria (lp) and increased frequencies of intraepithelial leucocytes () and goblet cells (). Compared with the normal morphological structure of the mid-intestine (c), one fish exhibited mild inflammatory changes (d), indicated by the increased presence of intraepithelial leucocytes () accompanied by widened lp, increased number of goblet cells and decreased supranuclear vacuolisation (v) in enterocytes. A few fish only exhibited decreased supranuclear vacuolisation in enterocytes. (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn)