2 Linear theory

The model system that we consider is a weakly ionized plasma composed of electrons, singly charged ions and negatively charged dust grains of uniform radius $R$ . The condition of overall charge neutrality is

Here, the subscripts $e,i$ and $d$ refer to electrons, ions and dust, respectively, and $Z_{d}$ is the charge state of the dust. There is a background neutral gas of density $n_{n}$ , and an external constant electric field $E_{0}$ which induces drifts in the charged-particle species. We assume that the drift velocity is roughly given by $\boldsymbol{U}_{j}=q_{j}\boldsymbol{E}_{0}/m_{j}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{j}$ , where $q_{j}$ and $m_{j}$ are the charge and mass of each charged-particle species, and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{j}$ is the collision frequency of each charged-particle species with the background neutral atoms. We will consider the frame where there is no dust drift. (In an experimental situation, this may be due to a balance of the electric force acting on the dust with the ion drag force which acts in the opposite direction.)

For this system, assuming that the particle velocity distributions can be described by drifting Maxwellians, the dispersion relation of the ion-dust streaming instability can be taken as (see e.g. Miyamoto Reference Miyamoto1989; Rosenberg Reference Rosenberg1996)

Here, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{Dj}=(T_{j}/4\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}n_{j}q_{j}^{2})^{1/2}$ is the Debye length, $v_{j}=(T_{j}/m_{j})^{1/2}$ is the thermal speed and $Z(\unicode[STIX]{x1D701})$ is the plasma dispersion function (Fried & Conte Reference Fried and Conte1961) with arguments

We consider a 1D system, with the wavevector $\boldsymbol{k}$ in the direction of the ion drift, which we take to be in the $x$ -direction. The 1D approximation is reasonable for the case that we consider in this paper where the ion drift speed is comparable to the ion thermal speed, since the fastest-growing waves would be expected to propagate along the ion streaming direction.

To solve (2.2), we consider a set of nominal dusty plasma parameters that may be within the range of possible dusty plasma experiments in PK-4 microgravity conditions (Fortov et al. Reference Fortov, Morfill, Petrov and Thoma2005; Khrapak et al. Reference Khrapak, Ratynskaia, Zobnin and Usachev2005). These parameters with a neon plasma are listed in table 1, along with corresponding approximate dimensionless parameters. The dust charge was estimated using the orbit-motion-limited approximation, but with a reduction of about $1/3$ due to ion collisional effects (see Khrapak et al. Reference Khrapak, Ratynskaia, Zobnin and Usachev2005). To obtain the electron and ion collision frequencies, we used $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{e,i}\sim \unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{e,i}n_{n}v_{e,i}$ with $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{e}\sim 2.5\times 10^{-16}~\text{cm}^{2}$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{i}\sim 1\times 10^{-14}~\text{cm}^{2}$ . The collision rate of dust with neutrals is given by Khrapak, Ivlev & Morfill (Reference Khrapak, Ivlev and Morfill2004) as $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{d}\sim (8\sqrt{2\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}}/3)R^{2}n_{n}v_{n}m_{n}/m_{d}$ , where the subscript $n$ refers to neutrals. With the parameters in table 1, taking $E_{0}\sim 1.7~\text{V}~\text{cm}^{-1}$ , we have that $U_{i}\sim v_{i}$ and $U_{e}\sim -0.25v_{e}$ .

Table 1.

Nominal parameters.

In this paper we are interested in the development of the DA instability in the case where the dust is warm, that is, where the dust acoustic speed, $c_{d}\sim \unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{Di}\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pd}$ , is not much larger than the dust thermal speed $v_{d}$ . This implies that $\sqrt{(T_{i}/T_{d})(Z_{d}^{2}n_{d}/n_{i})}$ is not much larger than unity. For the parameters in table 1, this requires small $T_{i}/T_{d}$ . For example, for $T_{d}\sim (T_{e}/1.5)\sim 110T_{i}\sim 3.3~\text{eV}$ (dust thermal speed $v_{d}\sim 18~\text{mm}~\text{s}^{-1}$ ), we have that $c_{d}/v_{d}\sim \sqrt{10}$ . (Note that even though $T_{d}/T_{i}\sim 110$ , the ratio of the ion thermal speed to the dust thermal speed is large, viz. $v_{i}/v_{d}\sim 2\times 10^{4}\gg 1$ .) The real frequency $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{R}$ and growth rate $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}$ obtained by solving (2.2) for the parameters in table 1, with $T_{e}/T_{d}=1.5$ , $U_{i}/v_{i}=1$ and $U_{e}/v_{e}=-0.25$ , are shown in figure 1(a).

Figure 1.

Real frequency $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{R}$ (blue, dashed curve) and growth rate $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}$ (red, solid curve) normalized to $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pd}$ versus $k\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{Di}$ obtained by solving (2.2) with $U_{i}/v_{i}=1$ and the dimensionless parameters in (a) table 1, with $T_{e}/T_{d}=1.5$ and $U_{e}/v_{e}=-0.25$ , and (b) table 2, with $T_{d}/T_{i}=1$ and $U_{e}=0$ .

Because of the very small charge-to-mass ratio of the dust, and correspondingly small ratio of the dust plasma frequency, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pd}$ , to the ion plasma frequency, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}$ , it is very time consuming to run a numerical simulation of the nonlinear development of this instability using table 1 parameters. However, the essential physics could be reasonably captured by using a set of reduced parameters which reflect the requisite ordering of physical quantities. This includes a dust charge-to-mass ratio which is much smaller than that of the ions, a dust acoustic speed which is much smaller than the ion thermal speed and a growth rate which is much smaller than the ion collision frequency. Thus, we require (1) $Z_{d}m_{i}/m_{d}\ll 1$ , (2) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pd}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}\ll 1$ , (3) $v_{d}<c_{d}\ll v_{i}$ and (4) wave frequency $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}\ll \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{i}$ . In addition, we need to keep the ratios $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{i}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{d}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pd}$ the same as those in table 1. A set of reduced parameters that satisfy these conditions is given in table 2.

Table 2.

Reduced parameters.

The solution of (2.2) for the real frequency $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{R}$ and growth rate $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}$ , for the parameters of table 2, with $T_{d}=T_{i}$ and $U_{i}=v_{i}$ is shown in figure 1(b). Because $T_{e}\gg T_{i}$ (which is generally representative of low-temperature dusty plasmas in ground-based or microgravity experiments), the electrons are kinetic with $\unicode[STIX]{x1D701}_{e}\ll 1$ , so for simplicity we have taken $U_{e0}=0$ . For the table 2 parameters, $c_{d}=\sqrt{10}v_{d}$ , which is approximately the same as in figure 1(a). As can be seen, the frequency and linear growth rates look similar in figure 1(a,b). This is because the dimensionless parameters that govern the linearly unstable spectrum, which include $U_{i}/v_{i}$ , $c_{d}/v_{d}$ , $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{i}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{d}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pd}$ , are approximately the same for both cases, and $T_{e}/T_{i}\gg 1$ in both cases. Thus, we will use table 2 parameters for the simulations in the next section.

It is expected from previous simulations of the ion-dust streaming instability that its nonlinear development is associated with an increase in $T_{d}$ (e.g. Winske et al. Reference Winske, Gary, Jones, Rosenberg, Chow and Mendis1995; Winske & Rosenberg Reference Winske and Rosenberg1998; Winske Reference Winske2004; Fu & Scales Reference Fu and Scales2012). For comparison with the simulation results in the next section, where it will be shown also that $T_{d}$ increases, here we show the results of linear theory for larger $T_{d}$ . As $T_{d}$ increases, the maximum growth rate of the linear instability shifts to smaller $k$ , i.e. longer wavelength. This may be due to increased dust Landau damping at larger $k$ as the dust thermal speed $v_{d}$ increases (Rosenberg et al. Reference Rosenberg, Thomas and Merlino2008). Figure 2(a) shows the solution of (2.2) for the same parameters as in figure 1(a), but with warmer dust, namely $T_{d}\sim 2T_{e}\sim 10~\text{eV}$ , for which the dust acoustic speed $c_{d}\sim 1.8v_{d}$ . As can be seen, maximum growth of the instability has shifted to longer wavelength. Figure 2(b) shows the solution of (2.2) for the reduced parameters used in figure 1(b), and for warmer dust with $T_{d}\sim 3T_{i}$ , for which the dust acoustic speed is also $c_{d}\sim 1.8v_{d}$ . As expected, the behaviour of the unstable spectrum for larger $T_{d}$ , where $c_{d}\sim 1.8v_{d}$ , appears similar in figure 2(a,b) for reasons discussed in the previous paragraph.

Figure 2.

Real frequency $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{R}$ (blue, dashed curve) and growth rate $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}$ (red, solid curve) normalized to $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pd}$ versus $k\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{Di}$ obtained by solving (2.2) with the parameters in (a) figure 1(a), except that $T_{e}/T_{d}=0.5$ , and (b) figure 1(b), except that $T_{d}/T_{i}=3$ .

3 Simulations

The simulations were performed with a 1D electrostatic PIC code with periodic boundary conditions. The plasma species in the PIC simulation consists of singly charged ions that stream in the $x$ -direction relative to multiply charged heavy dust grains that are stationary in the simulation reference frame. Because we will be considering the parameter range of figure 1(b), where $\unicode[STIX]{x1D701}_{e}\ll 1$ appears to hold reasonably well for the unstable spectrum, the electrons are treated as Boltzmann distributed and just provide charge neutrality. The ions and dust are treated as particles, and both particle species collide with background neutrals. A Langevin scattering operator, with a constant collision frequency for each charged species, is used to model collisional effects (Gillespie Reference Gillespie1993). The numerical implementation of the scattering operator is well established and is described in (Lemons et al. Reference Lemons, Lackman, Jones and Winske1995; Winske & Rosenberg Reference Winske and Rosenberg1998). There is a background electric field $\boldsymbol{E}_{0}=E_{0}\boldsymbol{x}$ , whose magnitude is set such that the corresponding electric force on the ions balances the ion-neutral collisional force to maintain a particular ion drift velocity $\boldsymbol{U}_{i}=U_{i}\boldsymbol{x}$ during the growth phase of the instability. For this purpose we use the approximate expression $E_{0}=m_{i}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{i}U_{i}/e$ . A nonlinear Poisson equation is used to obtain the self-consistent wave potential $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$ . Consistent with the Boltzmann approximation, the electron number density $n_{e}$ assumes the form $\displaystyle n_{e}=n_{e0}\text{e}^{e\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}/T_{e}}$ . Together with the ion and dust charge densities, the Poisson equation can then be solved by standard iterative means (Hockney & Eastwood Reference Hockney and Eastwood1981).

Quantities in the simulation are normalized to ion quantities at the beginning of the simulation. Temperatures and drift speeds are normalized to $T_{i0}$ and $v_{i0}$ , which are the initial ion temperature and thermal speed, respectively. Length scales are normalized to the ion Debye length $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{Di}$ evaluated at $T_{i0}$ and the initial ion density, while time scales are normalized to the ion plasma frequency $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}$ at the beginning of the simulation. The wave electrostatic potential energy $e\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$ is normalized to $T_{i0}$ (in energy units) and the wave electric field $\tilde{E}$ is normalized to $E_{r}=T_{i0}/e\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{Di}$ . In this 1D simulation, the system length is $128\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{Di}$ and is divided into 256 computational cells. To reduce the numerical noise, the ions and dust are modelled assuming approximately 26 million macroparticles for each species.

Case I. For the first set of simulations, which we call Case I, we use the reduced set of dimensionless parameters given in table 2. The initial drift speed of the ions is taken to be the initial ion thermal speed $v_{i0}$ , while the dust has zero drift. The initial dust temperature and the temperature of the neutrals are both taken to be $T_{i0}$ . Figure 3 shows the average wave electric field energy density as a function of time for this case. The system appears to be in a phase of rapid growth from $t\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}\sim 250{-}600$ ; this is roughly about three linear growth times, since from figure 1(b), $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pd}\sim 0.16$ , which implies that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}\sim 0.008$ . An estimate of the growth rate in the linear phase of the simulation can be obtained by calculating the logarithmic slope of $\tilde{E}^{2}$ between the times $400/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}$ and $600/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}$ . This yields $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}\sim 0.0065\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}$ , in reasonable agreement with the analytic estimate of the maximum growth rate shown in figure 1(b).

Figure 3.

Average wave electric field energy density versus time for Case I simulation.

Figure 4 shows the time histories of the ion and dust temperatures and drift speeds for this case, all averaged over the simulation domain. As can be seen in figure 4(a,b), the ion temperature $T_{i}$ and ion drift speed $U_{i}$ remain approximately constant, while figure 4(c,d) show that the dust temperature $T_{d}$ increases to about 2.5–3 times its initial value, and the dust drift speed $U_{d}$ increases to about ${\sim}0.02v_{i0}$ . With a dust temperature of $T_{d}\sim 3T_{i0}$ , the dust acoustic speed is near the dust thermal speed, with $c_{d}\sim 1.8v_{d}$ .

Figure 4.

Temperature and drift speed versus time for Case I simulation: (a) ion temperature, (b) ion drift speed, (c) dust temperature, (d) dust drift speed.

The panels in figure 5 show ion and dust phase-space plots, along with the spatial structure of the wave electrostatic potential, and the corresponding electric field, at $t\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}=400$ , which is during the rapid wave growth phase, and at $t\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}=1000$ , which is in the nonlinear phase. As can be seen from the ion and dust phase-space plots in the nonlinear phase at $t\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}=1000$ , the dust appears to get trapped by the waves, while the ions do not. The trapping condition is given in (Drummond et al. Reference Drummond, Malmberg, O’Neil and Thompson1970; Winske Reference Winske2004) as

where $U_{j}$ is the mean velocity of the trapped species and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{max}/k_{max}$ is the phase speed of the maximally unstable wave. For the dust, we have assumed that initially $U_{d}=0$ and, taking roughly $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{max}/k_{max}\sim c_{d}$ , we have that

For the ions, the initial ion drift $U_{i}=v_{i0}$ is much larger than the wave phase speed, so that

Thus, the condition for dust trapping depends roughly on the magnitude of the relative dust charge density, while the condition for ion trapping is constant for the case of fixed initial ion drift speed $U_{i}/v_{i0}$ which we consider here. For case I, $Z_{d}n_{d}/n_{i}=0.1$ (see table 2), so the condition (3.2) implies that $e\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}/T_{i0}\sim 0.05$ in order for dust to get trapped. This can be satisfied with the average values shown in figure 5(f). On the other hand, from figure 5(f) we see that the wave potential is not large enough to satisfy (3.3) for ion trapping. Thus, we expect dust trapping, but not much ion trapping, which is consistent with phase-space plots shown in figure 5(e,d).

Figure 5.

Phase-space plots and spatial structure of the wave potential for two different times in the simulation for Case I: $t\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}=400$ (a–c) and $t\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}=1000$ (d–f). The ion phase-space plots are shown in (a,d), the dust phase-space plots in (b,e) and the wave potential in (c,f).

The dust phase-space plots in figure 5(b,e) suggest that there is a dominant wavelength in the linear growth phase and a different dominant wavelength in the nonlinear phase. In the linear phase, there appears to be roughly ${\sim}11$ wavelengths (although irregular) in the simulation length (obtained by counting the peaks in $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$ in figure 5 c), implying that $k\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{Di}\sim 2\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}(11/128)\sim 0.5$ . In the nonlinear phase, the dust structures shown in figure 5(f) suggest a longer dominant wavelength (again somewhat irregular) with roughly seven wavelengths, implying that $k\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{Di}\sim 0.3$ . Because the ions do not appear to be trapped but still have a drift due to the external electric field, this suggests that there may be a secondary dust acoustic instability in the nonlinear phase. In this phase, the dust temperature has increased by about a factor of three due to dust trapping and heating by the waves. Thus, we would expect that the wavelength of a secondary DA instability would shift to longer wavelengths. This is consistent with the linear theory results shown in figure 2(b) for this case with $T_{d}\sim 3T_{i0}$ , where the maximum growth of the DA instability is roughly around $k\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{Di}\sim 0.3$ . In order to pin down in more detail the characteristics of this possible secondary instability, future work will analyse the ion and dust distribution functions and use the results in a linear theory analysis, similar to what has been done recently for the nonlinear phase of the Buneman instability in Jain, Umeda & Yoon (Reference Jain, Umeda and Yoon2011). In the latter paper, it was shown that wave spectra in the nonlinear phase of the Buneman instability could be be related to instantaneous particle distributions using linear theory.

For the parameters we are considering, the ion and dust collision rates are relatively large, and it is possible that the ion and dust distribution functions could become thermalized owing to collisions with neutrals modelled here using the Langevin operator. This might occur if the collision rate is comparable to or larger than the bounce frequency of a particle in the wave potential. The bounce frequency is given by (e.g. Nishikawa & Wakatani Reference Nishikawa and Wakatani1990)

where $\tilde{E}$ is the wave electric field. In the normalized units of our simulations, the ratio of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{b}$ to the ion plasma frequency is

Thus, for the dust,

which scales inversely with the relative dust charge density. For this case, from figure 3 the average magnitude of the normalized wave electric field $\tilde{E}/E_{r}\sim 0.025$ in the nonlinear phase. For the dust, we then have $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{b}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pd}\sim 0.27$ , which is comparable to the dust-neutral collision frequency $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{d}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pd}=0.2$ . Thus, while the waves are trapping and heating the dust, collisions are also cooling and tending to thermalize the dust grains. Since in this case we would expect the dust distribution to be near a Maxwellian, it may indeed be the case that a secondary instability in the nonlinear phase could be described by linear theory using a Maxwellian for the dust and a shifted Maxwellian for the ions. However, as mentioned above, the detailed investigation of this topic is left for future work.

Case II. From (3.2), it can be seen that as the relative charge density carried by the dust increases, the magnitude of the wave potential required for dust trapping also increases. And, as the wave potential increases, ion trapping could also occur, in contrast to Case I where the wave potential in the nonlinear phase is too small for ion trapping to occur. To investigate this, we reduce $Z_{d}$ and increase the initial $n_{d}/n_{i}$ in such a way as to increase $Z_{d}n_{d}/n_{i}$ but keep $Z_{d}^{2}n_{d}/n_{i}$ the same as in Case I. We keep the other quantities the same as in Case I, so that other dimensionless quantities including $c_{d}/v_{d}$ , $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{d}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pd}$ , $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pd}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{i}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}$ are the same as in Case I. Thus, taking the same initial ion drift $U_{i}=v_{i0}$ , the linear growth rate for the DA instability would be the same as in Case I.

Figure 6.

Average wave electric field energy density versus time for Case II simulation.

Figure 7.

Temperature and drift speed versus time for Case II simulation: (a) ion temperature, (b) ion drift speed, (c) dust temperature, (d) dust drift speed.

Thus, we take $Z_{d}=12.5$ and $n_{d}/n_{i}=0.064$ , so that $Z_{d}n_{d0}/n_{i0}=0.8$ , which is eight times as large as in Case I. We point out that this relative dust charge density is close to that in table 1, where $Z_{d}n_{d}/n_{i}=0.75$ . Thus, the condition for dust trapping given by (3.2) would be similar for the parameters of table 1. Figure 6 shows the average wave electric field energy density and figure 7 shows the time histories of the ion and dust temperatures. As can be seen from figure 6, the wave energy density is considerably larger than in Case I, by about two orders of magnitude. Figure 7 shows that the ion temperature increases by a small amount for this case, while the dust temperature increases by a factor of about 2.5–3 similarly to Case I. Figure 8 shows the ion and dust phase-space plots and spatial structure of the wave potential at times $t\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}=700$ in the linear phase and $t\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}=1300$ in the nonlinear phase. From figure 8(f), it can be seen that $e\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}/T_{i0}$ is large enough to satisfy (3.3), so that some ion trapping could occur. In addition, the condition (3.2) for dust trapping, $e\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}/T_{i0}\sim 0.4$ , is also satisfied. Thus, in this case, it appears that both dust and ion trapping could occur. This is consistent with the increases in ion and dust temperatures shown in figure 7(a,c), and with the phase-space plots in the nonlinear phase shown in figure 8(d,e). In addition, the mean speed of the ions is pulled to lower speeds, as shown in figure 7(b). Note that because the DA waves have to reach a higher amplitude than in Case I for dust trapping to occur, the nonlinear stage starts later than Case I, at about $t\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}\sim 1000$ .

Figure 8.

Phase-space plots and spatial structure of the wave potential for two different times in the simulation for Case II: $t\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}=700$ (a–c) and $t\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}=1300$ (d–f). The ion phase-space plots are shown in (a,d), the dust phase-space plots in (b,e) and the wave potential in (c,f).

We can estimate the bounce frequencies from (3.4), using an average normalized wave electric field magnitude of about 0.2 from figure 6. For the ions, this yields a bounce frequency of about $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{b}\sim 0.3\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}$ , while, for the dust, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{b}\sim 0.017\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pi}\sim 0.3\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{pd}$ . Both of these bounce frequencies are comparable to their respective collision frequencies, so this implies that collisions can play an important role in detrapping the ions and dust particles over a few bounce periods (see also Winske Reference Winske2004). For the ions, there is a relatively small increase in temperature shown in figure 7(a). There is also a small decrease of the mean ion drift shown in figure 7(b), while the phase-space plot in figure 8(d) shows a small downward shift of the ion speed in spatial regions where the wave potential has minima.

We note that for this case, the linear growth rate, the condition for trapping and the scaling of the normalized bounce frequencies with $Z_{d}n_{d}/n_{i}$ would be similar for the parameters in table 1 with initial $U_{i}=v_{i0}$ and $c_{d}/v_{d}=\sqrt{10}$ . This suggests that the nonlinear development shown for the set of reduced parameters in Case II may give a reasonable model for the nonlinear development of the DA instability for the experimentally representative parameters in table 1.

4 Summary

We have presented 1D PIC simulations of the nonlinear development of the dust acoustic instability in a collisional plasma where the dust is warm, that is, where the dust acoustic speed is not much larger than the dust thermal speed. Both ion-neutral and dust-neutral collisional effects were included in the simulations, along with a background electric field that generates an ion flow that excites the instability. We considered the parameter regime where the ion flow speed is thermal, which may be relevant to dusty plasma experiments in microgravity where electric fields that drive the ion flow can be weaker than in ground-based experiments.

We considered how the nonlinear development of the instability varies as the relative charge density of the dust varies, while other relevant dimensionless parameters remain the same. For the parameters we considered, it was found that when the relative dust charge density is small, the dust can get trapped and heated by the waves, but the ions do not appear to be affected much. In the nonlinear phase, there appears to be a dominant wavelength of the potential structure that is longer than the dominant wavelength in the linear phase. We suggested that this may be due to a secondary dust acoustic instability, which would have longer wavelength than the primary instability due to the elevated dust temperature. The dominant wavelength in the nonlinear phase appears to be consistent with the results of linear kinetic theory, using the initial ion and dust velocity distributions but with larger dust temperature. However, further work will analyse the actual ion and dust velocity distributions in the nonlinear phase and use these in a linear stability analysis of a possible secondary instability. When the relative dust charge density is large, the ions also begin to get trapped in the waves. In this case, while the dust gets heated, it appears that the ions get heated only slightly, along with a small decrease in the ion drift speed.