Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6bnxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T22:58:56.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary ascorbic acid and betaine improve stress responses, testosterone levels and some sexual traits in male Japanese quails during the dry season

Subject: Life Science and Biomedicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2021

Ifeanyichukwu Chukwuemeka Egbuniwe*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
Chukwuka Nwocha Uchendu
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
Ikechukwu Reginald Obidike
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
*
*Corresponding Author. E-mail: ifeanyiegbuniwe@gmail.com

Abstract

The experiment investigated the effects of dietary ascorbic acid and betaine stress responses, serum testosterone levels, and some sexual traits in male Japanese quails during the dry season. A total of 240 male Japanese quails (14 days old) were used and randomly assigned to four groups, each group has three replicates (n = 20). Birds in treatment groups were fed ascorbic acid (AA); betaine (BET); and AA + BET in their diets, whereas the control birds were fed only basal diet. Environmental conditions were predominantly outside thermoneutral zone for Japanese quails. Dietary AA ± BET increased (p < .05) serum catalase, reduced glutathione and testosterone, but lowered (p < .05) cortisol levels when compared with control group. Supplemental AA, BET, or AA + BET enhanced (p < .05) cloacal gland size and sexual traits. In conclusion, dietary AA and BET improved stress responses, serum testosterone levels, and some sexual traits in male Japanese quails during the dry season.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Result type: Supplementary result
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Boxplot describing micro-environmental conditions within the poultry house during the study period. DBT, dry bulb temperature ($ {}^{\circ} $C); RH, relative humidity (%).

Figure 1

Table 1. Indicators of stress in Japanese quails reared during the dry season (n = 6)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Changes in serum concentration of testosterone with age of Japanese quails during the study period. Control, basal diet; AA, ascorbic acid; BET, betaine; and AA + BET, combination of ascorbic acid and betaine included in diets. a,b,1,2Mean values with different superscript letters and numbers between and within groups, respectively, are significantly different (p < .05).

Figure 3

Table 2. Variations in sizes of cloacal gland and testes in male Japanese quails during the dry season

Reviewing editor:  Martin Michaelis University of Kent, School of Biosciences, Canterbury, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, CT2 7NJ
This article has been accepted because it is deemed to be scientifically sound, has the correct controls, has appropriate methodology and is statistically valid, and has been sent for additional statistical evaluation and met required revisions.

Review 1: Dietary ascorbic acid and betaine improve stress responses, testosterone levels and some sexual traits in male Japanese quails during the dry season

Conflict of interest statement

I did a peer review for this article. I do not have any conflict of interest.

Comments

Comments to the Author: It is understood that a correction was made by the author in this research article. It is recommended to rewrite the title, associating it with "heat stress". In the "Materials and Methods" section, it is recommended to write the method a little bit abbreviated. Also, due to the low number of results in this article, it is recommended to be published as "short communication".

Presentation

Overall score 3.3 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
3 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
3 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
4 out of 5

Context

Overall score 3.2 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
3 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
3 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
3 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
4 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 3.8 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
4 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
4 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
3 out of 5

Review 2: Dietary ascorbic acid and betaine improve stress responses, testosterone levels and some sexual traits in male Japanese quails during the dry season

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to the Author: This manuscript has been written very poor and needs to be thoroughly revised by native English speaker. A lot of grammatical syntax issues are in the text that should be amended before scientific revision.

Presentation

Overall score 1.9 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
1 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
1 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
4 out of 5

Context

Overall score 1.8 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
1 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
1 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
1 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 1.4 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
1 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
1 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
3 out of 5