Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nqrmd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T06:49:47.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Signature of ice streaming in Bjørnøyrenna, Polar North Atlantic, through the Pleistocene and implications for ice-stream dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Karin Andreassen
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Tromsø, NO-9037 Tromsø, Norway E-mail: karin.andreassen@uit.no
Monica Winsborrow
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Tromsø, NO-9037 Tromsø, Norway E-mail: karin.andreassen@uit.no
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The geomorphology of palaeo-ice-stream beds and the internal structure of underlying tills can provide important information about the subglacial conditions during periods of fast flow and quiescence. This paper presents observations from three-dimensional seismic data, revealing the geomorphology of buried beds of the Bjørnøyrenna (Bear Island Trough) ice stream, the main drainage outlet of the former Barents Sea ice sheet. Repeated changes in ice dynamics are inferred from the observed successions of geomorphic features. Megablocks, aligned in long chains parallel to inferred ice-stream flowlines, and forming dipping plates that are thrust one on top of another, are taken as evidence for conditions of compressive ice flow. Mega-scale glacial lineations (MSGL) and pull-apart of underlying sediment blocks suggest extensional flow. The observed pattern of megablocks and rafts overprinted by MSGL indicates a change in ice dynamics from a compressional to an extensional flow regime. Till stiffening, due to subglacial freezing, is the favoured mechanism for creating switches in sub-ice-stream conditions. The observed pattern of geomorphic features indicates that periods of slowdown or quiescence were commonly followed by reactivation and fast flow during several glaciations, suggesting that this may be a common behaviour of marine ice streams.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) [year] 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Shaded relief bathymetry of the Barents Sea. The red-edged box indicates location of Figure 2a. (b) Overview of the BSIS at the LGM (~18–16 ka). (c) Overview of the contemporaryWAIS. Modified from Oppenheimer (1998). LGM grounding line is from Anderson and Shipp (2001).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Illuminated perspective view of the southwestern Barents Sea and isopachs showing thickness of the Pli-Pleistocene GI–GII sediment units of the Bjørnøya TMF (in metres; modified from Fiedler and Faleide, 1996). The inferred ice flowlines are simplified from Andreassen and others (2008). Te: Pre-Pliocene Tertiary sediments. Location is shown in Figure 1a. (b) Geoseismic profile with location as indicated in (a). The black-edged boxes in (a) and (b) indicate location of the 3-D seismic dataset used in this study.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Interpreted seismic profile from the 3-D dataset at the shelf break of the Bjørnøya TMF and stratigraphic chart. Pre-Pliocene stratigraphy and environment are from Ryseth and others (2003). Plio-Pleistocene age estimates, although uncertain, are from Faleide and others (1996) and Butt and others (2000). E: Early; M: Middle; L: Late.

Figure 3

Fig 4. (a) Illuminated shaded relief image of seismic horizon Intra GIIIa. Stratigraphic level is indicated in Figure 3. (b) Root mean square (RMS) of the seismic amplitude of the volume indicated by the shaded bands in (d) and (e). (c) The dark areas represent megablocks and rafts of different sediment type than the surrounding material. The blue arrow indicates orientation of chains of sediment blocks. (d, e) Seismic profiles showing high-amplitude reflection segments just below the Intra GIIIa seismic horizon. (f) The red parts illustrate that many of the sediment blocks of (b) and (c) fit together like parts of a jigsaw puzzle. The blue and purple arrows indicate directions of pull-apart of sediment blocks in (f) and orientation of MSGL in (a–c). (a), (b), (c) and (f) are modified from Andreassen and others (2007).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. (a) Shaded relief image of Intra GII buried horizon showing MSGL with different orientations (arrows marked 1, 2 and 3). (b) Seismic section with location indicated in (a). (c) RMS of the seismic amplitude of the volume indicated by the shaded bands in (d) and (e). (d, e) Seismic profile showing high-amplitude reflection segments just below the Intra GII seismic horizon.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. (a) Reflection amplitude of seismic horizon Intra GII showing MSGL with different orientations (arrows marked 1, 2 and 3). (b–d) Seismic sections with locations indicated in (a).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. (a) Reflection amplitude of seismic horizon Intra GII (detail from Fig. 6a). White lines indicate MSGL. (b) Sketch illustrating interpretation of the appearance of MSGL as white lines on seismic amplitude images.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. (a) Seismic amplitude of Intra GIIIb reflection. (b) Shaded relief image of Intra GIIIb. (c) Seismic profile with location as indicated in (a).