Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T14:43:54.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aonchotheca annulosa and Aonchotheca murissylvatici, which is which? A reappraisal of the gastrointestinal Aonchotheca (Nematoda: Capillariidae) species common in wood mice and bank voles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2024

Jerzy M. Behnke Open the ORCID record for Jerzy M. Behnke [Opens in a new window]  and
Joseph A. Jackson Open the ORCID record for Joseph A. Jackson [Opens in a new window]
Jerzy M. Behnke*
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK
Joseph A. Jackson*
Affiliation:
School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Manchester, UK
*
Corresponding authors: Jerzy M. Behnke; Email: Jerzy.Behnke@Nottingham.ac.uk; Joseph A. Jackson; Email: J.A.Jackson@Salford.ac.uk
Corresponding authors: Jerzy M. Behnke; Email: Jerzy.Behnke@Nottingham.ac.uk; Joseph A. Jackson; Email: J.A.Jackson@Salford.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) and bank voles (Myodes glareolus) are often employed as natural study models in infectious disease ecology. Yet the identities of some elements of their parasite fauna have been subject to long-standing confusion. One instance of this relates to 2 nominal species of the capillariid nematode genus Aonchotheca: Aonchotheca annulosa (Dujardin, 1845) and A. murissylvatici (Diesing, 1851). Through literature review, analysis of recorded host- and site-specificity and tracing of taxonomic precedence, it is possible to confirm that A. annulosa is a valid species with a spicule c. 1000 microns long, a small intestinal site of infection and a wide host range centred in murine rodents (with A. sylvaticus the most common host). On the other hand, tracing the provenance of A. murissylavtici through to the works of the early naturalists reveals it is best assigned as a nomen nudum (lacking sufficient establishing description) or a junior synonym of A. annulosa and does not have precedence for the other Aonchotheca morphotype commonly found in Eurasian rodents. The first description consonant with this other morphotype, which has a short spicule (200–250 microns in length) and occurs primarily in the stomach of bank voles and other cricetids, was as Capillaria halli by Kalantarian in 1924. We thus recommend the suppression of A. murissyvatici in favour of Aonchotheca halli (Kalantarian, 1924) for this gastric-specialist short-spicule morphotype, particularly as the use of the A. murissylvatici name and its variants has previously been associated with substantial inconsistency and misidentification with A. annulosa.

Keywords

Aonchotheca annulosaAonchotheca halliAonchotheca murissylvaticiApodemus sppMyodes glareolussmall intestinespiculestomach

Information

Type
Review Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 151 , Issue 14 , December 2024 , pp. 1497 - 1507
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) and bank voles (Myodes glareolus) have often been employed by parasitologists and infectious disease ecologists as natural study models. Despite this relatively high level of attention, however, the identities of some elements of their parasite fauna have been subject to long-standing confusion. One instance of this relates to 2 nominal Aonchotheca species that have frequently been reported in the gastrointestinal lumen of wood mice and bank voles, and in other Eurasian rodents. These are Aonchotheca annulosa (Dujardin, Reference Dujardin1845) and A. murissylvatici (Diesing, Reference Diesing1851). Unfortunately, although 2 genuine species do seem to be involved, these appear to have been confused for one another in a substantial proportion of the literature, especially that relating to epidemiology and helminth community structure in wild European rodents.

Aonchotheca spp. are nematodes belonging to the trichinelloid family Capillariidae Railliet, 1915 which contains several species of medical or veterinary significance. Capillariids parasitize all 5 classes of vertebrates and comprise over several hundred described species (Moravec, Reference Moravec2000), each of which specializes in exploiting a particular host body organ (e.g. intestinal tract, liver, bladder, etc.). Capillariid life cycles can be complex, involving up to 2 different intermediate, transport or paratenic hosts, but few have been documented in detail, and the range of hosts of some species is poorly known (Moravec et al., Reference Moravec, Prokopic and Shilkas1987; Anderson, Reference Anderson2000). The taxonomy of this group is also complex, with many changes over the years of the scientific nomenclature of individual species, as well as revision of the structure of the taxon (Moravec, Reference Moravec1982, Reference Moravec2000). Moreover, the recent application of molecular tools has revealed cases of incongruence with phylogenetic studies based on classic morphology (Borba et al., Reference Borba, Machado-Silva, Le Bailly and Iniguez2019; Deng et al., Reference Deng, Suleman, Zhang, Li, Li, Fu, Liu and Yao2022).

Capillariids frequently adopt histozoic infection habits, burrowing in the solid tissue of various organs (Anderson, Reference Anderson2000), and this may lead to an increased propensity to cause disease. For example, the species considered here often burrow partially within the gastrointestinal mucosa (Roman, Reference Roman1951). Sometimes they are associated with tumour-like formations in the stomach (Roman, Reference Roman1951) or may build up to high population sizes, forming tangled aggregations that could physically interfere with digestion. Furthermore, a number of the better-studied capillariids lack narrow specificity to the definitive host and may cause transboundary or zoonotic outbreaks. Examples of this are Paracapillaria philippinensis, the agent of intestinal capillariasis (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Lin, Choi, Hwang, Hsu, Bair, Liu, Wang, Liu and Chung2006), Calodium hepaticum, the agent of hepatic capillariasis (Fuehrer et al., Reference Fuehrer, Igel and Auer2011), and Eucoleus aerophilus, a lungworm primarily infecting canids that can also infect humans (Lalosević et al., Reference Lalosević, Lalosević, Klem, Stanojev-Jovanović and Pozio2008). Even amongst the species considered here, A. annulosa is known to infect primates (Capuchin Monkeys and Baboons) in captivity and thus might have some zoonotic potential (Moravec and Baruš, Reference Moravec and Baruš1991). Given these disease-causing and host-switching proclivities, and the past confusion that has affected the identification of the common gastrointestinal Aonchotheca nematodes occurring in rodents in Eurasia, our aim here is to clarify the systematics and nomenclature of these species.

Below we begin by reviewing the historic literature on Aonchotheca-like forms in the gastrointestinal lumen of wood mice, bank voles and other Eurasian rodents and then we identify the problems that have given rise to confusion. Finally, we propose a solution that is biologically representative and that also conforms to the rules of Zoological nomenclature, and we recommend how these species should be identified and referred to in future work.

Aonchotheca annulosa is a valid species

The earliest record of capillariid nematodes from wild rodents is by Dujardin (Reference Dujardin1845), who described a species from the intestine of rats in Northern France, the males of which possessed a relatively long spicule (0.95 mm). Dujardin named these nematodes Calodium annulosum. Travassos (Reference Travassos1915) moved the species to the genus Capillaria, as Capillaria annulosa, and then López-Neyra (Reference López-Neyra1947) to Aonchotheca. Hence this species is now usually known as A. annulosa. The relatively long spicule of A. annulosa has been reaffirmed on multiple occasions (e.g. Mészáros, Reference Mészáros1977 [1.00–1.02 mm]; Mészáros, Reference Mészáros1978 [1.00 mm]; Bain and Wertheim, Reference Bain and Wertheim1981 [1.14 mm]; Moravec and Baruš, Reference Moravec and Baruš1991 [1.11–1.27 mm]; Umur et al., Reference Umur, Moravec, Gurler, Bolukbas and Acici2012 [0.86–1.08 mm]) in consonant material. Thus, the modern concept of A. annulosa is clearly linked to Dujardin's original record by the presence of a distinctive long spicule and by the typical site of infection in the small intestine of Eurasian rodents. Aonchotheca annulosa may therefore be considered an uncomplicated and valid taxon.

Aonchotheca halli has precedence on a short-spicule morphotype mostly occurring in Eurasian cricetids

In the same monograph of 1845, Dujardin also described female worms from the intestine (Diesing, Reference Diesing1851) of Mus sylvaticus (= A. sylvaticus) which he referred to as ‘Trichosome du mulot (Mus sylvaticus)’. Six years later Diesing (Reference Diesing1851) created the name Trichosomum muris sylvatici Dujardin, based on some part of the specimens collected by Dujardin from wood mice. Diesing specified Dujardin as the authority for this taxon, but as Dujardin did not formally name his specimens, Diesing has been taken as the authority by subsequent authors. Diesing (Reference Diesing1851) provided only very sparse and ambiguous information to add to the minimal description provided by Dujardin, and together these works lack any diagnostic morphological information useful in distinguishing between the Aonchotheca morphotypes found in present-day Eurasian rodents. In particular, no information was provided by either author on male worms, which were lacking in Dujardin's original collection. In all likelihood, Diesing's taxon was the same species, A. annulosa, as the specimens Dujardin had found in the intestine of rats, given the preference of A. annulosa for the small intestine of murine hosts (see also below). Thus, T. muris sylvatici of Diesing might be regarded as a junior synonym of A. annulosa. Alternatively, it could be argued that the information surrounding T. muris sylvatici is so sparse and inconclusive that it should instead be considered a nomen nudum (i.e. effectively lacking an establishing description [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1999]).

Despite its poor support in evidence, T. muris sylvatici Diesing (Reference Diesing1851) was moved to the genus Capillaria Zeder, 1800 by Travassos (1915; see also Moravec, Reference Moravec1982). Thereafter it became stabilized within Capillaria or Aonchotheca (which is the generic classification we accept here) by later authors who arbitrarily linked it to small-spicule morphotypes that were not described for the first time until the early 20th century. At times 3 different versions of the specific name have been employed: muris sylvatici, muris-sylvatici or murissylvatici. In fact, the earliest record of a rodent-infecting Aonchotheca-like capillariid clearly different to A. annulosa was by Kalantarian (Reference Kalantarian1924) who described material with a short spicule (0.1928 mm; approximately one-quarter of the length found in A. annulosa), that she recovered from the migratory or grey dwarf hamster (Nothocricetulus migratorius (= Cricetulus migratorius) [Pallas, 1773]) in Armenia. This was named Capillaria halli by Kalantarian (Reference Kalantarian1924) but was later synonymized with C. murissylvatici, by Teixeira De Freitas and Lent (Reference Teixeira De Freitas and Lent1936). These latter authors gave the spicule length for C. murissylvatici as exactly the same as given earlier by Kalantarian (Reference Kalantarian1924) for C. halli, although they did not attribute this measurement to her work. Teixeira De Freitas and Lent (Reference Teixeira De Freitas and Lent1936) included bank voles and wood mice, alongside the migratory hamster, as hosts of C. murissylvatici, likely on the basis of records by Baylis (Reference Baylis1928) and Elton et al. (Reference Elton, Ford, Baker and Gardiner1931) mentioned further below.

Following the work of Teixeira De Freitas and Lent (Reference Teixeira De Freitas and Lent1936), reports of C. halli-like short-spicule morphotypes tended to be attributed to C. murissylvatici. Roman (Reference Roman1939) reported worms occurring in large numbers within tumour-like developments of the gastric mucosa of French voles (primarily bank voles). He provided comprehensive measurements of gastric specimens from bank voles that confirmed the relatively short spicule of the male worms (0.187–0.247 mm and mean of 0.219 mm). In this publication and in his review of 1951 (Roman, Reference Roman1951) Roman further established one concept of C. murissylvatici as a parasite of the gastric mucosa of microtine voles. This concept was followed by several later authors, who placed the species either in Capillaria or Aonchotheca. This included Justine and de Roguin (Reference Justine and de Roguin1990) who again confirmed the short spicule length (0.200–0.215 mm) in stomach-dwelling forms.

Aonchotheca annulosa in the small intestine has likely often been misidentified

Aonchotheca nematodes are long, thin, filamentous worms that penetrate the intestinal mucosa. Because of their fragility, their length and their location in the mucosa, they are easily fragmented upon recovery from the host. Moreover, they are not easy to identify precisely by those who are not closely familiar with the taxon. It is perhaps not surprising, therefore, that additional confusion has arisen in the literature about whether the worms observed in rodent intestines were A. murissylvatici or A. annulosa. This confusion has been further exacerbated by reports in journals that are not easily accessed even today (especially those from East European university and society journals), and hence relevant studies have not always been available to those describing and/or reporting on these species.

The stage for confusion between the stomach and small intestine-specialist Aonchotheca species may have been partly set by Elton et al. (Reference Elton, Ford, Baker and Gardiner1931). Following Baylis (Reference Baylis1928) these authors reported what they called ‘Capillaria? muris-sylvatici’ from the small intestines of both wood mice and bank voles. Given the site of infection, this is in fact likely to have been A. annulosa. Furthermore, Elton et al. (Reference Elton, Ford, Baker and Gardiner1931) reported ‘Capillaria or Hepaticola sp.indet.’ from the stomachs of wood mice, but, given the site of infection, this is likely to have been the A. halli morphotype associated with A. murissylvatici by many authors (see above), or a Eucoleus species. Several authors working on the epidemiology of helminths in wild rodents from the British Isles (Lewis, Reference Lewis1968a; Canning et al., Reference Canning, Cox, Croll and Lyons1973; Langley and Fairley, Reference Langley and Fairley1982; O'Sullivan et al., Reference O'sullivan, Smal and Fairley1984; Montgomery and Montgomery, Reference Montgomery and Montgomery1988, Reference Montgomery and Montgomery1990; Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert2000; Loxton et al., Reference Loxton, Lawton, Stafford and Holland2016; Stuart et al., Reference Stuart, Paredis, Henttonen, Lawton, Ochoa Torres and Holland2020), as well as those working in continental Europe (Sołtys, Reference Sołtys1949; Erhardová and Ryšavý, Reference Erhardová and Ryšavý1955; Tenora and Baruš, Reference Tenora and Baruš1955; Tenora and Zavadil, Reference Tenora and Zavadil1967; Bjelić-Čabrilo et al., Reference Bjelić-Čabrilo, Popović, Šimić and Kostić2009, Reference Bjelić-Čabrilo, Kostić, Popović, Cirković, Aleksić and Lujić2011; Movsesyan et al., Reference Movsesyan, Nikoghosian, Petrosian, Vlasov and Kuznetsov2018) followed this lead, reporting A. murissylvatici from the small intestines of rodents (see Table 1). Thus, although A. annulosa has been recorded only rarely in the British Isles (James, Reference James1954; Wakelin, Reference Wakelin1968; Jackson et al., Reference Jackson, Friberg, Bolch, Lowe, Ralli, Harris, Behnke and Bradley2009; Behnke unpublished observations) this likely reflects underreporting due to misidentification with A. murissylvatici. On the European mainland, despite some likely misidentification (discussed by Moravec [Reference Moravec2000]), A. annulosa is nonetheless recognized as a frequent parasite of the small intestine from studies of bank voles (Tenora and Zejda, Reference Tenora and Zejda1974; Mészáros, Reference Mészáros1978; Milazzo et al., Reference Milazzo, Casanova, Aloise, Ribas and Cagnin2003a; Grzybek et al., Reference Grzybek, Bajer, Bednarska, Alsarraf, Behnke-Borowczyk, Harris, Price, Brown, Osborne, Siński and Behnke2015), and of other rodent species (Moravec, Reference Moravec2000).

Table 1.

Chronological list of papers reporting Aonchotheca murissylvatici

For each publication, we give the name of the parasite as stated in that paper. Note, that this is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all papers, but the majority of studies undertaken in the British Isles are covered, and representative/key studies from abroad have also been included. We have not included all recent studies where no information was given on the criteria for species assignment nor on the gastrointestinal site from which the worms were recovered. Initially, the species was recorded as Trichosomum muris sylvatici by Diesing (Reference Diesing1851). It was then moved to the genus Capillaria Zeder, 1800 by Travassos (Reference Travassos1915), and subsequently to a new genus, Aonchotheca, by López-Neyra in 1947, although as is evident above, for over 60 further years many authors continued to refer to Capillaria murissylvatici. The hosts reported above are: Apodemus sylvaticus, Apodemus uralensis, Rattus norvegicus, Nothocricetulus migratorius (syn. Cricetulus accedula), Microtus arvalis, Microtus pennsylvanicus and Myodes glareolus. Clethrionomys is taken to be a junior synonym of Myodes and records previously named Cricetulus migratorius are assigned to Nothocricetulus migratorius.

a The original version of the name as in publication.

b Not stated whether the high frequency and intensity were for worms in the stomach or small intestine. Sympatric wood mice were not infected.

c In these studies the intestinal site is not given in the paper but has been confirmed by correspondence with the authors.

In contrast to authors who understood A. murissylvatici to be a small intestinal parasite, others, following Texeira De Freitas and Lent (Reference Teixeira De Freitas and Lent1936) and Roman (Reference Roman1951), were quite definite that A. murissylvatici is a parasite of the stomach. Among the earliest was Thomas (Reference Thomas1953) who found heavy infections in the stomachs of bank voles in Scotland, and then the work of Kisielewska (Reference Kisielewska1970a, Reference Kisielewska1970b, Reference Kisielewska1983) in Poland emphasized that A. murissylvatici is a bank vole stomach specialist. Others include Murúa (Reference Murúa1978), Justine and de Roguin (Reference Justine and de Roguin1990) and more recently, Miljević et al. (Reference Miljević, Čabrilo, Budinski, Rajičić, Bajić, Bjelić-Čabrio and Blagojević2022).

Other relevant Aonchotheca species in Eurasia

Aonchotheca annulosa and A. halli are the only Aonchotheca species to be frequently reported in Eurasian rodents (with nominal records of A. murissylvatici most likely to be one or the other), if A. wioletti (Rukhlyadeva, 1950) is accepted as a junior synonym of A. halli (following Justine and de Roguin, Reference Justine and de Roguin1990). However, an assemblage of Aonchotheca-like species is known in glirids (dormice) (Justine et al., Reference Justine, Ferté and Bain1987; Veciana et al., Reference Veciana, Chaisiri, Morand and Ribas2016) whose members could potentially be confused with A. halli and should be kept in mind given the low specificity of many capillariids. Of these forms in glirids, both A. myoxinitelae (Diesing, Reference Diesing1851) and A. legerae (Justine et al., Reference Justine, Ferté and Bain1987) appear to have a longer spicule than A. halli (>0.26 mm). Furthermore, both have more prominent structures around the vulval opening and shorter ejaculatory ducts (Pisanu and Bain, Reference Pisanu and Bain1999), amongst other potential differentiating features (Justine et al., Reference Justine, Ferté and Bain1987; Pisanu and Bain, Reference Pisanu and Bain1999). Tenoranema alcoveri Mas-Coma and Esteban, Reference Mas-Coma and Esteban1985, also from glirids, which is close to Aonchotheca and whose generic characters require further clarification, has a spicule that overlaps that of A. halli, but is distinguished by the presence of complex digitiform rays supporting the bursa (Mas-Coma and Esteban, Reference Mas-Coma and Esteban1985; Justine et al., Reference Justine, Ferté and Bain1987). Apart from these species in glirids, 2 additional rodent-infecting species occur in Eurasia. This includes the relatively poorly known A. armeniaca (Kirschenblat, 1939), which has a long spicule (1.10 mm) and infects the small intestine of Citellus spp. in Armenia (Veciana et al., Reference Veciana, Chaisiri, Morand and Ribas2016), and the more recently described Aonchotheca yannickchavali, Veciana et al., Reference Veciana, Chaisiri, Morand and Ribas2016 which is distinguished by a very large, tube-like projection associated with the vulva and infects the intestine of Bandicota species in Thailand (Veciana et al., Reference Veciana, Chaisiri, Morand and Ribas2016). Moreover, it should be borne in mind that several poorly known species with some similarity to A. halli have been recorded in a variety of non-rodent mammalian hosts in Eurasia. This includes A. musimon Pisanu and Bain, Reference Pisanu and Bain1999 and A. bilobata (Bhalerao, 1933) in ungulates and A. speciosa (Beneden, 1873) in bats. The existence of this additional sympatric diversity emphasizes the importance of future molecular studies to further elucidate the relationships of A. halli to similar forms in non-rodent hosts.

Recommendations

In order to survive in the hostile environment of the mammalian intestine, helminths evolve to become specialists in parasitizing specific regions of the intestine where they can best resist acidity, host enzymes and other defences against invasion by microorganisms (Schad, Reference Schad1963; Crompton, Reference Crompton1973; Sukhdeo and Sukhdeo, Reference Sukhdeo and Sukhdeo1994; Sukhdeo and Bansemir, Reference Sukhdeo and Bansemir1996). In our view it is unlikely, therefore, that a species that has become a specialist for survival in the duodenum, will be able to cope equally well in the stomach.

As justified in the sections above, the most parsimonious explanation of the confusion in the literature is that the commonly-occurring gastrointestinal Aonchotheca fauna of European rodents is made up of 2 site-specialist species. One is a gastric mucosal specialist, living intertwined in the glandular, pyloric region of its host's stomach and while perhaps occasionally worms in heavy infections may spill over into the duodenum, this nematode is not usually a resident of the small intestine. The other is an intestinal specialist species, A. annulosa, also usually with a mucosal burrowing habit. We propose that most of the previous reports of ‘A. murissylvatici’ from the small intestine were in fact A. annulosa. We further propose that the stomach-dwelling species should be referred to by the name Aonchotheca halli (Kalantarian, Reference Kalantarian1924). As explained above, this has precedence on the stomach-dwelling short-spicule, cricetid-specialist morphotype, replacing ‘A. murissylvatici’ which has very dubious support in evidence. Although the type specimens of A. halli and its original description are not available (despite our efforts to locate these), Texeira De Freitas and Lent's redrawings of Kalantarian's specimens are sufficient to link these to the small-spicule gastrointestinal Aonchotheca morphotype occurring in Eurasian cricetids. This shift in nomenclature is in line with rules on precedence in the International Zoological Code of Nomenclature (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1999). Moreover, rather than disturbing stability and precedent, this in fact draws a line under more than 100 years of incorrect, inconsistent and biologically confusing use of the name A. murissylvatici and its variants, within which a large proportion of nominal records are likely to have been misidentifications of A. annulosa. One additional advantage of suppressing A. murissylvatici will be that the instability associated with the exact form of the name (muris sylvatici/muris-sylvatici/murissylvatici) will also be curtailed.

The host-specificity, geographical distribution, zoonotic potential and identification of A. annulosa and A. halli

Given clarification of the species concepts for these Aonchotheca morphotypes common in wood mice and bank voles, a clearer picture can be formed of their broader host and geographical distributions. To this end we carried out a literature search of host and geographical records. We accepted all records of A. annulosa from the intestine of hosts. For A. halli, we only accepted records of ‘A. murissylvatici’ from the stomach of hosts, or in the case of intestinal records, where a positive identification had been made based on morphological criteria. From summaries of the resulting data (Figs 1 and 2) it can be seen that A. annulosa (Fig. 1) has the wider host range of the 2 species. Whilst it is most often recorded in Apodemus and Rattus it can also infect a range of other murines but also cricetids, sciurids, mustelids and insectivores. Moreover, it has been recorded more than once in primates (baboons and monkeys) in zoological park settings (Moravec, Reference Moravec2000; Umur et al., Reference Umur, Moravec, Gurler, Bolukbas and Acici2012). As previously recognized, this wide host range could be indicative of transboundary and zoonotic potential. The distribution of this species extends across a very wide area of Eurasia, with records from Atlantic islands likely indicating a propensity to be spread anthropogenically via commensal murine hosts (e.g. rats). In contrast to A. annulosa, A. halli has narrower specificity infecting primarily bank voles, but also some other cricetids and, in fewer cases, murines (Fig. 2) . Although reliable records of this species are less numerous, it also seems to have a very wide distribution within Eurasia (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Geographical and host distribution of Aonchotheca annulosa (Dujardin, Reference Dujardin1845). Top panel shows locations of nominal records of A. annulosa in Eurasia. Bottom panels show pie charts representing the proportional frequency of records of A. annulosa at different host taxonomic levels. Based on 91 records drawn from publications cited in the main text and also Balfour (Reference Balfour1922), Lewis (Reference Lewis1927), Bernard (Reference Bernard1961), Mészáros and Murai (Reference Mészáros and Murai1979), Mas-Coma and Feliu (Reference Mas-Coma and Feliu1981), Mészáros et al. (Reference Mészáros, Habijan and Mikes1983), Mészáros and Štollmann (Reference Mészáros and Štollmann1984), Jirouš (Reference Jirouš1985), Justine (Reference Justine1989), Mascato et al. (Reference Mascato, Rey, Bos, Peris, Paniagua and Blanco1993), Afonso-Roque (Reference Afonso-Roque1995), Asakawa and Tenora (Reference Asakawa and Tenora1996), Casanova et al. (Reference Casanova, Miquel, Fons, Molina, Feliu, Mathias, Torres, Libois, Santos-Reis, Collares-Pereira and Marchand1996), Milazzo et al. (Reference Milazzo, de Bellocq, Cagnin, Casanova, di Bella, Feliu, Fons, Morand and Santalla2003b), Fuentes et al. (Reference Fuentes, Sáez, Trelis, Galán-Puchades and Esteban2004, Reference Fuentes, Sainz-Elipe, Sáez-Durán and Galán-Puchades2010), Pisanu et al. (Reference Pisanu, Jerusalem, Huchery, Marmet and Chapuis2007, Reference Pisanu, Lebailleux and Chapuis2009), Ondríková et al. (Reference Ondríková, Miklisová, Ribas and Stanko2010), Salvador et al. (Reference Salvador, Guivier, Xuéreb, Chaval, Cadet, Poulle, Sironen, Voutilainen, Henttonen, Cosson and Charbonnel2011), Kirillova (Reference Kirillova2011, Reference Kirillova2012), Romeo et al. (Reference Romeo, Ferrari, Saino, Wauters and Lanfranchi2012, Reference Romeo, Wauters, Ferrari, Lanfranchi, Martinoli, Pisanu, Preatoni and Sainu2014), Debenedetti et al. (Reference Debenedetti, Sáez-Durán, Sainz-Elipe, Galán-Puchades and Fuentes2014, Reference Debenedetti, Sainz-Elipe, Sáez-Durán, Galicia, Imaz, Galán-Puchades and Fuentes2015), López González (Reference López González2014), Meshkekar et al. (Reference Meshkekar, Sadraei, Mahmoodzadeh and Mobedi2014), Čabrilo et al. (Reference Čabrilo, Jovanović, Bjelić-Čabrilo, Budinski, Blagojević and Vujošević2016, Reference Čabrilo, Jovanović, Bjelić-Čabrilo, Budinski, Blagojević and Vujošević2018), Martínez-Rondán et al. (Reference Martínez-Rondán, Ruiz de Ybáñez, Tizzani, López-Beceiro, Fidalgo and Martínez-Carrasco2017), Galán-Puchades et al. (Reference Galán-Puchades, Sanxis-Furió, Pascual, Bueno-Marí, Franco, Peracho, Montalvo and Fuentes2018), Mazhari et al. (Reference Mazhari, Moosavi, Mostafavi, Esfandiari, Mobedi, Rahimi Esboei and Mowlavi2019), Islam et al. (Reference Islam, Farag, Hassan, Enan, Mohammadi, Aldiqs, Alhussain, Al Musalmani, Al-Zeyara, Al-Romaihi, Yassine, Sultan, Bansal and Mkhize-Kwitshana2024). Points either represent records from specific localities or central points for a general area, depending on the precision given in the respective publications.

Figure 2.

Geographical and host distribution of Aonchotheca halli (Kalantarian, Reference Kalantarian1924). Top panel shows locations of records of ‘A. murissylvatici’ where these were from the stomach, or where there was a definite morphological identification. Bottom panels show pie charts representing the proportional frequency of records of A. halli at different host taxonomic levels. Based on 30 records drawn from publications cited in the main text or Fig. 1 and also Asakawa et al. (Reference Asakawa, Yokoyama and Fukumoto1983, Reference Asakawa, Hasegawa, Ohnuma, Tatsushima and Ohbayashi1992, Reference Asakawa, Koyasu, Harada, Krishna, Mekada and Oda1997).

For the practical purposes of future identification, these 2 species differ in several morphological criteria (and accurate descriptions can be found in Moravec [Reference Moravec2000] and Justine and de Roguin [Reference Justine and de Roguin1990]) but, if male worms are available, can be most easily distinguished by the difference in the length of spicules: A. annulosa has spicules that are about 4 times longer than those of A. halli (c. 0.20–0.25 vs c. 1.00 mm) (Table 2, Fig. 3). In females, A. halli has a small vulval appendage (Justine and de Roguin, Reference Justine and de Roguin1990; see also Read, Reference Read1949) and A. annulosa lacks such an appendage but usually has an elevated anterior vulval lip (Moravec and Baruš, Reference Moravec and Baruš1991) (Fig. 3). A key for the identification of the Aonchotheca species found in European rodents is provided in Table 2. For unambiguous differentiation of A. annulosa and A. halli that does not depend on skilled microscopic observation, the use of 18S rRNA gene DNA sequencing might be recommended. Our preliminary molecular results (manuscript in prep.) suggest this will easily distinguish between these 2 species. In a forthcoming study, we will be depositing reference sets of sequences for both species that will facilitate molecular identification.

Figure 3.

Diagnostic features in Aonchotheca halli (Kalantarian, Reference Kalantarian1924) (A–D) and Aonchotheca annulosa (Dujardin, Reference Dujardin1845) (E–G). Scale bars indicate 0.1 mm. (A) Posterior region of male worm. (B) Posterior extremity of male worm with spicule in lateral view. (C) Terminal region of female reproductive tract. (D) Anterior region of female worm. (E) Posterior region of male worm, with partly evaginated spicule sheath, in sublateral view. (F) Terminal region of female reproductive tract. (G) Anterior region of female worm. A–D are based on specimens from the stomach of bank voles in Cornwall, UK; E–G are based on specimens from the intestine of wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) in Nottinghamshire, UK.

Table 2.

A dichotomous key for the identification of Aonchotheca species in European rodents

Note: not included in the key, in wider Eurasia other records include the poorly known A. armeniaca, which has a spicule c. 1.1 mm in length and infects the small intestine of Citellus spp. and A. yannickchavali which infects the stomach of Bandicota spp. in Thailand and is distinguished by a very large tube-like projection associated with the vulva (see Veciana et al., Reference Veciana, Chaisiri, Morand and Ribas2016). Measurements are given in mm unless otherwise indicated.

Data availability statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff at the University of Nottingham library for their efforts to help us trace some of the less accessible literature. We are grateful to Sally and Ian Montgomery, Derek Wakelin, Celia Holland and J. Mike Kinsella for their comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this Manuscript.

Author contributions

This paper was written jointly by the authors.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

References

Abu-Madi, MA, Behnke, JM, Lewis, JW and Gilbert, FS (2000) Seasonal and site specific variation in the component community structure of intestinal helminths in Apodemus sylvaticus from three contrasting habitats in south-east England. Journal of Helminthology 74, 7–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Afonso-Roque, MM (1995) The helminth fauna of the terrestrial vertebrates from S. Miguel island (Azores): an annotated checklist of known species. Arquipélago. Life and Marine Sciences 13, 99–104.Google Scholar
Anderson, RC (2000) Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates: Their Development and Transmission, 2nd Edn. Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CABI Publishing, 650pp. ISBN: 978-0-85199-421-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asakawa, M and Tenora, F (1996) A checklist of epidemiology of nematode parasites of the genus Apodemus (Murinae: Rodentia) throughout the world excluding Japan. Journal of the Rakuno Gakuen University 20, 181–213.Google Scholar
Asakawa, M, Yokoyama, Y and Fukumoto, SI (1983) A study of the internal parasites of Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae (Thomas). Japanese Journal of Parasitology 32, 399–411.Google Scholar
Asakawa, M, Hasegawa, H, Ohnuma, M, Tatsushima, T and Ohbayashi, M (1992) Parasitic nematodes of rodents on the off-shore islands of Hokkaido. Japanese Journal of Parasitology 41, 40–45.Google Scholar
Asakawa, M, Koyasu, K, Harada, M, Krishna, SC, Mekada, K and Oda, SI (1997) Parasitic helminths from Himalayan field mice, Apodemus gurkha and Sikkim vole, Microtus sikimensis, in the Himalayas, Nepal. Japanese Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 2, 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, O and Wertheim, G (1981) Helminthes d'oiseaux et de mammifères d'Israël. IX. Compléments morphologiques sur quelques Capillaria (Nematoda, Trichinelloidea). Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 4e Sér. A 3, 1061–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balfour, A (1922) Observations on wild rats in England, with an account of their ecto- and endoparasites. Parasitology 14, 282–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, HA (1928) Records of some parasitic worms from British vertebrates. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 10 1, 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, HA (1939) Further records of parasitic worms from British vertebrates. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 11 4, 473–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnke, JM, Lewis, JW, Mohd Zain, SN and Gilbert, FS (1999) Helminth infections in Apodemus sylvaticus in southern England: interactive effects of host age, sex and year on the prevalence and abundance of infections. Journal of Helminthology 73, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behnke, JM, Rogan, MT, Craig, PS, Jackson, JA and Hide, G (2021) Long-term trends in helminth infections of wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) from the vicinity of Malham Tarn in North Yorkshire, England. Parasitology 148, 451–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernard, J (1961) Liste des nématodes parasites des micromammifères de la faune Belge. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 36, 775–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjelić-Čabrilo, O, Čabrilo, B and Popović, E (2013) Helminth fauna of rodents (Mammalia, Rodentia) from Zasavica (Serbia). Biologia Serbica 35, 43–47.Google Scholar
Bjelić-Čabrilo, O, Popović, E, Šimić, SD and Kostić, DS (2009) Nematofauna of bank voles – Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber, 1780) – from Mt. Fruška Gora (Serbia). Archives of Biological Sciences, Belgrade 61, 555–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjelić-Čabrilo, O, Kostić, D, Popović, E, Cirković, M, Aleksić, N and Lujić, J (2011) Helminth fauna of the bank vole Myodes glareolus (Rodentia, Arvicolinae) on the territory of Fruska Gora Mountain (Serbia) – a potential sources of zoonoses. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 17, 829–836.Google Scholar
Borba, VH, Machado-Silva, JR, Le Bailly, M and Iniguez, AM (2019) Worldwide paleodistribution of capillariid parasites: paleoparasitology, current status of phylogeny and taxonomic perspectives. PLoS ONE 14, e0216150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Čabrilo, B, Jovanović, VM, Bjelić-Čabrilo, O, Budinski, I, Blagojević, J and Vujošević, M (2016) Diversity of nematodes in the yellow-necked field mouse Apodemus flavicollis from the Peripannonic region of Serbia. Journal of Helminthology 90, 14–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Čabrilo, B, Jovanović, VM, Bjelić-Čabrilo, O, Budinski, I, Blagojević, J and Vujošević, M (2018) Is there a host sex bias in intestinal nematode parasitism of the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis) at Obedska bara pond, Serbia? Helminthologia 55, 247–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canning, EU, Cox, FEG, Croll, NA and Lyons, KM (1973) The natural history of Slapton Ley Nature Reserve: VI Studies on the parasites. Field Studies 3, 681–718.Google Scholar
Casanova, JC, Miquel, J, Fons, R, Molina, X, Feliu, C, Mathias, MDL, Torres, J, Libois, R, Santos-Reis, M, Collares-Pereira, M and Marchand, B (1996) On the helminthfauna of wild mammals (Rodentia, Insectivora and Lagomorpha) in Azores Archipelago (Portugal). Vie et Milieu 46, 253–259.Google Scholar
Crompton, DWT (1973) The sites occupied by some parasitic helminths in the alimentary tract of vertebrates. Biological Reviews 48, 27–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Debenedetti, Á, Sáez-Durán, S, Sainz-Elipe, S, Galán-Puchades, M and Fuentes, M (2014) Hepatic parasitosis in two wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus (Rodentia: Muridae), due to Aonchotheca annulosa (Nematoda: Trichuridae), and Eucoleus bacillatus (Nematoda: Trichuridae). Erratic parasitism or post mortem migration?. Acta Parasitologica 59, 610–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Debenedetti, AL, Sainz-Elipe, S, Sáez-Durán, S, Galicia, D, Imaz, A, Galán-Puchades, MT and Fuentes, MV (2015) The helminth community of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus from the Erro River valley, Navarre, Spain. Journal of Helminthology 89, 727–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deng, Y-P, Suleman, , Zhang, X-L, Li, R, Li, L-Y, Fu, Y-T, Liu, G-H and Yao, C (2022) Aonchotheca (Nematoda:Capillariidae) is validated as a separate genus from Capillaria by both mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Parasites and Vectors 15, 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, KM (1851) Systema Helminthum, V 2. Vindobonac: W. Braumüller, 588pp.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F (1845) Histoire Naturelle des Helminthes ou Vers Intestinaux. Paris: Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, 654pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, C, Ford, EB, Baker, JR and Gardiner, AD (1931) The health and parasites of a wild mouse population. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1931, 657–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erhardová, B and Ryšavý, B (1955) [Contribution to the knowledge of parasitic worms of our mice and voles]. Zoologické a Entomologické Listy 4, 71–90 (in Czech with Russian summary).Google Scholar
Feliu, C, Renaud, F, Catzeflis, F, Hugot, J-P, Durand, P and Morand, S (1997) A comparative analysis of parasite species richness of Iberian rodents. Parasitology 115, 453–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuehrer, HP, Igel, P and Auer, H (2011) Capillaria hepatica in man – an overview of hepatic capillariosis and spurious infections. Parasitology Research 109, 969–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, MV, Sáez, S, Trelis, M, Galán-Puchades, MT and Esteban, JG (2004) The helminth community of the wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus, in the Sierra Espuna, Murcia, Spain. Journal of Helminthology 78, 219–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuentes, MV, Sainz-Elipe, S, Sáez-Durán, S and Galán-Puchades, MT (2010) The helminth community of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus in a Mediterranean ecosystem in regeneration ten years after a wildfire. Journal of Helminthology 84, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galán-Puchades, MT, Sanxis-Furió, J, Pascual, J, Bueno-Marí, R, Franco, S, Peracho, V, Montalvo, T and Fuentes, MV (2018) First survey on zoonotic helminthosis in urban brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) in Spain and associated public health considerations. Veterinary Parasitology 259, 49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzybek, M, Bajer, A, Bednarska, M, Alsarraf, M, Behnke-Borowczyk, J, Harris, PD, Price, S, Brown, GS, Osborne, S-J, Siński, E and Behnke, JM (2015) Long-term spatiotemporal stability and dynamic changes in helminth infracommunities of bank voles (Myodes glareolus) in NE Poland. Parasitology 142, 1722–1743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999) International Code of Zoological nomenclature, 4th Edn. The Natural History Museum, London: International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature.Google Scholar
Islam, MM, Farag, E, Hassan, MM, Enan, KA, Mohammadi, A, Aldiqs, AK, Alhussain, H, Al Musalmani, E, Al-Zeyara, AA, Al-Romaihi, H, Yassine, HM, Sultan, AA, Bansal, D and Mkhize-Kwitshana, Z (2024) Rodent-borne parasites in Qatar: a possible risk at the human-animal-ecosystem interface. One Health 18, 100708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, JA, Friberg, IM, Bolch, L, Lowe, A, Ralli, C, Harris, PD, Behnke, JM and Bradley, JE (2009) Immunomodulatory parasites and toll-like receptor-mediated tumour necrosis factor alpha responsiveness in wild mammals. BMC Biology 7, 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, PM (1954) On some helminths from British small mammals, with a re-description of Echinorhynchus rosai Porta, 1910. Journal of Helminthology 28, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jirouš, J (1985) Qualitative structure of intestinal helminth fauna of small rodents in successive stages of spoil banks in the Most Basin (northern Bohemia) and in their surroundings. Věstnik Českolovenské Společnosti Zoologické 49, 87–100.Google Scholar
Justine, J-L (1989) Liste des Capillaria (Nematoda, Capillariinae) parasites de Mammifères africains. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 11, 755–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Justine, J-L and de Roguin, L (1990) Capillaria murissylvatici (Nematoda, capillariinae), parasite d'un Rongeur du Baluchistan Iranien. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Ser 4 12, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Justine, J-L, Ferté, H and Bain, O (1987) Trois Capillaria (Nematoda) de l'intestin du lérot en France. Rapports avec un Capillaria de l'estomac du sanglier. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle 9, 579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalantarian, EV (1924) K faune paraziticheskikh chervey gryzunov Armenii. Proceedings of the Tropical Institute of Arme 1, 18–31.Google Scholar
Kirillova, NY (2011) Helminthofauna of mammals of Samara Luka. Report 1. Yellow-necked mouse Sylvaemus flavicollis (Melchior) (Rodentia, Muridae). Samara Luka: Problems of Regional and Global Ecology 20, 172–176.Google Scholar
Kirillova, NY (2012) Helminthofauna of mammals of Samara Luka. Report 2. Field mouse Apodemus agrarius (Pall.)(Rodentia, Muridae). Samara Luka: Problems of Regional and Global Ecology 21, 143–147.Google Scholar
Kisielewska, K (1970 a) Ecological organization of intestinal helminth groupings in Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreb.) (Rodentia). 1. Structure and seasonal dynamics of helminth groupings in a host population in the Bialowieża National Park. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 18, 121–147.Google Scholar
Kisielewska, K (1970 b) Ecological organization of intestinal helminth groupings in Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreb.) (Rodentia). V. Some questions concerning helminth groupings in the host individuals. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 17, 197–208.Google Scholar
Kisielewska, K (1983) Ecological characteristics of parasitic worm (helminth) communities. Acta Theriologica 28(Suppl), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimpel, S, Forster, M and Schmahl, G (2007) Parasite fauna of the bank vole (Clethrionomys glaroelus) in an urban region of Germany: reservoir host zoonotic metazoan parasites? Parasitology Research 102, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, Scl, Fenton, A, Petchey, OL, Jones, TR, Barber, R and Pedersen, AB (2013) Stability of within-host-parasite communities in a wild mammal system. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280, 20130598.Google Scholar
Lalosević, D, Lalosević, V, Klem, I, Stanojev-Jovanović, D and Pozio, E (2008) Pulmonary capillariasis miming bronchial carcinoma. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 78, 14–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langley, R and Fairley, JS (1982) Seasonal variations in infestations of parasites in a wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus population in the west of Ireland. Journal of Zoology, London 198, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, EA (1927) A survey of Welsh helminthology. Journal of Helminthology 5, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, JW (1968 a) Studies on the helminth parasites of the long-tailed field mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus sylvaticus from Wales. Journal of Zoology, London 154, 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, JW (1968 b) Studies on the helminth parasites of voles and shrews from Wales. Journal of Zoology, London 154, 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, JW, Morley, NJ and Behnke, JM (2023) Helminth parasites of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus in southern England: Levels of infection, species richness and interactions between species. Journal of Helminthology 97, e18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, JW and Twigg, GI (1972) A study of the internal parasites of small rodents from woodland areas in Surrey. Journal of Zoology (London) 166, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Neyra, RP (1947) Los Capillariinae. Memorias de la Real Academia de Ciencias de Madrid 12, 1–248.Google Scholar
López González, M (2014) Helmintofauna de roedores de Canarias: estudio faunístico, ecológico y molecular (PhD thesis). San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain: Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.Google Scholar
Loxton, KC, Lawton, C, Stafford, P and Holland, CV (2016) Reduced helminth parasitism in the introduced bank vole (Myodes glareolus): more parasites lost than gained. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 5, 175–183.Google ScholarPubMed
Loxton, KC, Lawton, C, Stafford, P and Holland, CV (2017) Parasite dynamics in an invaded ecosystem: helminth communities of native wood mice are impacted by the invasive bank vole. Parasitology 144, 1476–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, LH, Lin, MR, Choi, WM, Hwang, KP, Hsu, YH, Bair, MJ, Liu, JD, Wang, TE, Liu, TP and Chung, WC (2006) Human intestinal capillariasis (Capillaria philippinensis) in Taiwan. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 74, 810–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-Rondán, FJ, Ruiz de Ybáñez, MR, Tizzani, P, López-Beceiro, AM, Fidalgo, LE and Martínez-Carrasco, C (2017) The American mink (Neovison vison) is a competent host for native European parasites. Veterinary Parasitology 247, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mas-Coma, S and Esteban, JG (1985) Tenoranema alcoveri gn, sp. n. (Trichuridae: Capillariinae), a nematode parasitizing Eliomys quercinus (Rodentia: Gliridae). Folia Parasitologica 32, 35–42.Google Scholar
Mas-Coma, S and Feliu, C (1981) Erinaceus (Aethechinus) algirus, a new host for Capillaria annulosa. Circular Farmaceutica 35, 323–326.Google Scholar
Mascato, FA, Rey, J, Bos, J, Peris, D, Paniagua, E and Blanco, P (1993) Parásitos Capillariinae (Nematoda) de algunas especies de micromamíferos Gallegos. Nova Acta Cientifica Compostelana (Bioloxía) 4, 111–120.Google Scholar
Mazhari, N, Moosavi, P, Mostafavi, E, Esfandiari, B, Mobedi, I, Rahimi Esboei, B and Mowlavi, G (2019) Intestinal parasitic helminths of Rattus spp. in Caspian Sea littoral, Iran. Journal of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 7, 32–36.Google Scholar
Meshkekar, M, Sadraei, J, Mahmoodzadeh, A and Mobedi, I (2014) Helminth infections in Rattus rattus and Rattus norvigicus in Tehran, Iran. Iranian Journal of Parasitology 9, 548–552.Google ScholarPubMed
Mészáros, F (1977) Parasitic nematodes of the hamster (Cricetus cricetus L.) in Hungary. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 23, 133–138.Google Scholar
Mészáros, F (1978) Parasitic nematodes of Clethrionomys glareolus (Rodentia) in Hungary. Parasitologica Hungarica 11, 87–100.Google Scholar
Mészáros, F and Murai, E (1979) Contribution to the knowledge of helminths of rodents in Romania. Parasitologica Hungarica 12, 55–70.Google Scholar
Mészáros, F and Štollmann, A (1984) Results of complex parasitological investigations on small mammals in the Cergov Mountains (Western Carpathians, Czechoslovakia). Miscellanea Zoologica Hungarica 2, 7–11.Google Scholar
Mészáros, F, Habijan, V and Mikes, M (1983) Parasitic nematodes of rodents in Vojvodina (Yugoslavia). Parasitologia Hungarica 16, 103–110.Google Scholar
Milazzo, C, Casanova, JC, Aloise, G, Ribas, A and Cagnin, M (2003 a) Helminths of the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus (Rodentia, Arvicolinae) in southern Italy. Italian Journal of Zoology 70, 333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milazzo, C, de Bellocq, JG, Cagnin, M, Casanova, JC, di Bella, C, Feliu, C, Fons, R, Morand, S and Santalla, F (2003 b) Helminths and ectoparasites of Rattus rattus and Mus musculus from Sicily, Italy. Comparative Parasitology 70, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milazzo, C, Aloise, G, Cagnin, M, Di Bella, C, Geraci, F, Feliu, C and Casanova, JC (2005) Helminths of Apodemus sylvaticus (Muridae) distributed on the Southern European border (Italian Peninsula). Vie et Milieu 55, 45–51.Google Scholar
Miljević, M, Čabrilo, B, Budinski, I, Rajičić, M, Bajić, B, Bjelić-Čabrio, O and Blagojević, J (2022) Host-parasite relationship-nematode communities in populations of small mammals. Animals 12, 2617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, SSJ and Montgomery, WI (1988) Cyclic and non-cyclic dynamics in populations of the helminth parasites of wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus. Journal of Helminthology 62, 78–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, SSJ and Montgomery, WI (1990) Structure, stability and species interactions in helminth communities of wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus. International Journal for Parasitology 20, 225–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moravec, F (1982) Proposal of a new systematic arrangement of nematodes of the family Capillariidae. Folia Parasitologica 29, 119–132.Google ScholarPubMed
Moravec, F (2000) Review of capillariid and trichosomoidid nematodes from mammals in the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae 64, 271–304.Google Scholar
Moravec, F and Baruš, V (1991) Systematic status of Thominx platyrrhinorum Baruš, 1961 (Nematoda: Capillariidae). Folia Parasitologica 38, 155–162.Google ScholarPubMed
Moravec, F, Prokopic, P and Shilkas, AV (1987) The biology of nematodes of the family Capillariidae Neveu-Lemaire, 1936. Folia Parasitologica 34, 39–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Movsesyan, SO, Nikoghosian, MA, Petrosian, RA, Vlasov, EA and Kuznetsov, DN (2018) Nematodes of rodents of Armenia. Annals of Parasitology 64, 173–180.Google ScholarPubMed
Murúa, RE (1978) Studies on the ecology of parasites of Apodemus sylvaticus (L.) and Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreb.)(Rodentia): analysis of the parasite populations and their seasonal variation in the Bristol area. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 25, 149–161.Google Scholar
Ondríková, J, Miklisová, D, Ribas, A and Stanko, M (2010) The helminth parasites of two sympatric species of the genus Apodemus (Rodentia, Muridae) from south-eastern Slovakia. Acta Parasitologica 55, 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'sullivan, HM, Smal, CM and Fairley, JS (1984) A study of parasitic infestations in populations of small rodents (Apodemus sylvaticus and Clethrionomys glareolus) on Ross Island, Killarney. Journal Life Sciences Royal Dublin Society 5, 29–42.Google Scholar
Pisanu, B and Bain, O (1999) Aonchotheca musimon n. sp. (Nematoda: Capillariinae) from the mouflon Ovis musimon in the sub-Antarctic Kerguelen archipelago, with comments on the relationships with A. bilobata (Bhalerao, 1933) Moravec, 1982 and other species of the genus. Systematic Parasitology 43, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisanu, B, Jerusalem, C, Huchery, C, Marmet, J and Chapuis, J-L (2007) Helminth fauna of the Siberian chipmunk, Tamias sibiricus Laxmann (Rodentia, Sciuridae) introduced in suburban French forests. Parasitology Research 100, 1375–1379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pisanu, B, Lebailleux, L and Chapuis, JL (2009) Why do Siberian chipmunks Tamias sibiricus (Sciuridae) introduced in French forests acquired so few intestinal helminth species from native sympatric Murids? Parasitology Research 104, 709–714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, CP (1949) Studies on North American helminths of the genus Capillaria Zeder, 1800 (Nematoda): II. Additional capillarids from mammals with keys to the North American Mammalian species. Journal of Parasitology 35, 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribas, A, Torre, I, Feliu, C, Arrizabalaga, A and Casanova, JC (2009) Helminth communities of the bank vole Myodes glareolus (Rodentia, Arvicolinae) in two populations: Montseny Natural Park (north-eastern Spain) and Pi Natural Reserve (French Pyrenees). Revista Ibero-Latinoamericana de Parasitologia 1, 73–81.Google Scholar
Roman, E (1939) Adénome pylorique chez un campagnol parasité par Capillaria muris-sylvatici. Annales de Parasitologie 17, 167–169.Google Scholar
Roman, E (1951) Etude écologique et morphologique sur les acanthocéphales et les nématodes parasites des rats de la region Lyonaisse. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (Serie A. Zoologie) 2, 49–269.Google Scholar
Romeo, C, Ferrari, N, Saino, N, Wauters, LA and Lanfranchi, P (2012) Parasites and biological invasions: do helminths play a role in facilitating grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) settlement and in its competition with native red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris)? Mappe Parassitologiche 18, 145–145.Google Scholar
Romeo, C, Wauters, LA, Ferrari, N, Lanfranchi, P, Martinoli, A, Pisanu, B, Preatoni, DG and Sainu, N (2014) Macroparasite fauna of alien grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis): composition, variability and implications for native species. PLoS ONE 9, e88002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salvador, AR, Guivier, E, Xuéreb, A, Chaval, Y, Cadet, P, Poulle, ML, Sironen, T, Voutilainen, L, Henttonen, H, Cosson, JF and Charbonnel, N (2011) Concomitant influence of helminth infection and landscape on the distribution of Puumala hantavirus in its reservoir, Myodes glareolus. BMC Microbiology 11, 30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schad, GA (1963) Niche diversification in a parasitic species flock. Nature 198, 404–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, GI (1964) The helminth parasites of some small mammal communities. I. The parasites and their hosts. Parasitology 54, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sołtys, A (1949) Pasożyty wewnętrzne drobnych gryzoni leśnych (Muridae) Parku Narodowego w Białowieży. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Składowska Lublin-Polonia. Section C 4, 233–259.Google Scholar
Stuart, P, Paredis, L, Henttonen, H, Lawton, C, Ochoa Torres, CA and Holland, CV (2020) The hidden faces of a biological invasion: parasite dynamics of invaders and natives. International Journal for Parasitology 50, 111–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sukhdeo, MVK and Bansemir, AD (1996) Critical resources that influence habitat selection decisions by gastrointestinal helminth parasites. International Journal for Parasitology 109, 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukhdeo, MVK and Sukhdeo, SC (1994) Optimal habitat selection by helminths within the host environment. Parasitology 109, S41–S55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teixeira De Freitas, JF and Lent, H (1936) Estudo sobre os Capillariinae parasitos de mammiferos (Nematoda: Trichuroidea). Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 31, 85–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenora, F and Baruš, V (1955) Helminthofauna myší a hrabošů státní přírodní reservace v Lednici a okolí. Práce Brněnské Základny Československé Akademie Věd 28, 461–482.Google Scholar
Tenora, F and Zavadil, R (1967) A contribution to the evaluation of capillariid nematodes found in rodents in Czechoslovakia. Sbornik Vysoke Skoly zemedelske v Brne 15, 357–368.Google Scholar
Tenora, F and Zejda, J (1974) The helminth synusy of Clethrionomys glareolus in a lowland forest and its changes. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium – Academiae Scientiarum Bohemoslovacae Brno 6, 1–48.Google Scholar
Tenora, F, Meszaros, F and Wiger, R (1977) Further records of nematodes in small rodents in Norway. Parasitologia Hungarica 10, 85–89.Google Scholar
Thomas, RJ (1953) On the nematodes and trematode parasites of some small mammals from the Inner Hebrides. Journal of Helminthology 28, 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travassos, L (1915) Contribuição para o conhecimento de fauna helminthologia brasiliera. V. Sobre as especies brasileiras do genero Capillaria Zeder 1900. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 7, 146–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umur, S, Moravec, F, Gurler, A, Bolukbas, C and Acici, M (2012) First report on Aonchotheca annulosa Dujardin, 1845 (Nematoda, Capillariidae) in a hamadryas baboon (Papio hamadryas) from a zoo in Northern Turkey. Journal of Medical Primatology 41, 384–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veciana, M, Chaisiri, K, Morand, S and Ribas, A (2016) Aonchotheca yannickchavali n.sp. (Nematoda: Capillariidae) in Bandicota indica (Bechstein, 1800) and Bandicota savilei (Thomas, 1916) (Rodentia: Muridae) collected from Thailand. Agricultural and Natural Resources 50, 470–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakelin, D (1968) Nematodes of the genus Capillaria Zeder, 1800 from the collection of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine III. Capillariids from mammalian hosts. Journal of Helminthology 42, 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Chronological list of papers reporting Aonchotheca murissylvatici

Figure 1

Figure 1. Geographical and host distribution of Aonchotheca annulosa (Dujardin, 1845). Top panel shows locations of nominal records of A. annulosa in Eurasia. Bottom panels show pie charts representing the proportional frequency of records of A. annulosa at different host taxonomic levels. Based on 91 records drawn from publications cited in the main text and also Balfour (1922), Lewis (1927), Bernard (1961), Mészáros and Murai (1979), Mas-Coma and Feliu (1981), Mészáros et al. (1983), Mészáros and Štollmann (1984), Jirouš (1985), Justine (1989), Mascato et al. (1993), Afonso-Roque (1995), Asakawa and Tenora (1996), Casanova et al. (1996), Milazzo et al. (2003b), Fuentes et al. (2004, 2010), Pisanu et al. (2007, 2009), Ondríková et al. (2010), Salvador et al. (2011), Kirillova (2011, 2012), Romeo et al. (2012, 2014), Debenedetti et al. (2014, 2015), López González (2014), Meshkekar et al. (2014), Čabrilo et al. (2016, 2018), Martínez-Rondán et al. (2017), Galán-Puchades et al. (2018), Mazhari et al. (2019), Islam et al. (2024). Points either represent records from specific localities or central points for a general area, depending on the precision given in the respective publications.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Geographical and host distribution of Aonchotheca halli (Kalantarian, 1924). Top panel shows locations of records of ‘A. murissylvatici’ where these were from the stomach, or where there was a definite morphological identification. Bottom panels show pie charts representing the proportional frequency of records of A. halli at different host taxonomic levels. Based on 30 records drawn from publications cited in the main text or Fig. 1 and also Asakawa et al. (1983, 1992, 1997).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Diagnostic features in Aonchotheca halli (Kalantarian, 1924) (A–D) and Aonchotheca annulosa (Dujardin, 1845) (E–G). Scale bars indicate 0.1 mm. (A) Posterior region of male worm. (B) Posterior extremity of male worm with spicule in lateral view. (C) Terminal region of female reproductive tract. (D) Anterior region of female worm. (E) Posterior region of male worm, with partly evaginated spicule sheath, in sublateral view. (F) Terminal region of female reproductive tract. (G) Anterior region of female worm. A–D are based on specimens from the stomach of bank voles in Cornwall, UK; E–G are based on specimens from the intestine of wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) in Nottinghamshire, UK.

Figure 4

Table 2. A dichotomous key for the identification of Aonchotheca species in European rodents