Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-12T05:23:45.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence-based mechanistic role of chrysin towards protection of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2022

Sonali Meshram
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
Vipin Kumar Verma
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
Ekta Mutneja
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
Anil Kumar Sahu
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
Salma Malik
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
Prashant Mishra
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
Jagriti Bhatia
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
Dharamvir S. Arya*
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
*
*Corresponding author: Dharamvir S Arya, email dsarya16@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cardiac hypertrophy is the enlargement of cardiomyocytes in response to persistent release of catecholamine which further leads to cardiac fibrosis. Chrysin, flavonoid from honey, is well known for its multifarious properties like antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic and anti-apoptotic. To investigate the cardioprotective potential of chrysin against isoproterenol (ISO), cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis are induced in rats. Acclimatised male albino Wistar rats were divided into seven groups (n 6): normal (carboxymethyl cellulose at 0·5 % p.o.; as vehicle), hypertrophy control (ISO 3 mg/kg, s.c.), CHY15 + H, CHY30 + H & CHY60 + H (chrysin; p.o.15, 30 and 60 mg/kg respectively + ISO at 3 mg/kg, s.c.), CHY60 (chrysin 60 mg/kg in per se) and LST + H (losartan 10 mg/kg p.o. + ISO 3 mg/kg, s.c.) were treated for 28 d. After the dosing schedule on day 29, haemodynamic parameters were recorded, after that blood and heart were excised for biochemical, histological, ultra-structural and molecular evaluations. ISO administration significantly increases heart weight:body weight ratio, pro-oxidants, inflammatory and cardiac injury markers. Further, histopathological, ultra-structural and molecular studies confirmed deteriorative changes due to ISO administration. Pre-treatment with chrysin of 60 mg/kg reversed the ISO-induced damage to myocardium and prevent cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis through various anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, antioxidant and anti-fibrotic pathways. Data demonstrated that chrysin attenuated myocardial hypertrophy and prevented fibrosis via activation of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β)/Smad signalling pathway.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Effect of CHY on HW:BW ratio. Data are expressed as mean ± sem; n 6 in each group. P-value is represented as a: P < 0·001 v. N group and m: P < 0·001 v. HC group. HC and CHYP groups were compared with N group; however, the CHY15 + H, CHY30 + H, CHY60 + H and LST + H groups were compared with HC group. HW:BW, heart weight:body weight; N, normal; HC, cardiac hypertrophy; CHY, chrysin; CHYPs, chrysin per se; LST, losartan; H, hypertrophy.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Effect of CHY on haemodynamic parameters. Data are expressed as mean ± sem; n 6 in each group. P-value is represented as a: P < 0·001 v. N group and m: P < 0·001 v. HC group. HC and CHYP groups were compared with N group; however, the CHY15 + H, CHY30 + H, CHY60 + H and LST + H groups were compared with HC group. SAP, systolic arterial pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; DAP, diastolic arterial pressure; LVDEP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; (±) LV dP/dt, rate of change of left ventricular pressure; N, normal; HC, cardiac hypertrophy; CHY, chrysin; CHYP, chrysin per se; LST, losartan; H, hypertrophy.

Figure 2

Table 1. Effect of CHY on biochemical and cardiac injury markers(Mean values with their standard errors of the mean, n 6 in each group)

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Effect of CHY on inflammatory markers. Data are expressed as mean ± sem; n 6 in each group. P-value is represented as a: P < 0·001 v. N group and m: P < 0·001, m”: P < 0·05 v. HC group. HC and CHYP groups were compared with N group; however, the CHY15 + H, CHY30 + H, CHY60 + H and LST + H groups were compared with HC group. N, normal; HC, cardiac hypertrophy; CHY, chrysin; CHYP, chrysin per se; LST, losartan; H, hypertrophy.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Effect of CHY on cardiac histopathology (20X; n 3; scale bar 50 μm; haematoxylin–eosin staining). A: normal; B: cardiac hypertrophy; C: chrysin 15 mg/kg +H; D: chrysin 30 mg/kg+H; E: chrysin 60 mg/kg+H; F: chrysin per se; G: LST 10 mg/kg+H; and H: graph showing difference in myocyte area (µm2) in between the groups. HC and CHYPs groups were compared with N group; however, the CHY15 + H, CHY30 + H, CHY60 + H and LST + H groups were compared with HC group. P-value is represented as a: P < 0·001 v. N group and m: P < 0·001 v. HC group. Arrow (à) shows inflammation in the tissue.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Effect of CHY on ultra-structural changes. (A–G; scale bar:1 μm). A: normal; B: cardiac hypertrophy; C: chrysin 15mg/kg +H; D: chrysin 30 mg/kg+H; E: chrysin 60 mg/kg+H; F: chrysin per se; and G: losartan 10 mg/kg+H. H, hypertrophy; MC, mitochondria; MF, myofibrils. Red arrow (à) indicates mitochondrial damage and yellow star (*) indicates myofibril damage.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Effect of CHY on apoptotic protein expressions. A: SDS-PAGE of homogenate (Coomassie-stained); B: immunoblots of GAPDH, Bax, Bcl-2, caspase-3, PARP and cytochrome C; C: GAPDH; D: Bax, Bcl-2 and Bcl-2:Bax ratio; E: caspase-3; and F: PARP and cytochrome C. Data are expressed as mean of relative intensity w.r.t. normal group; n 3 in each group. P-value is represented as a: P < 0·001, a': P < 0·01 v. N group; m: P < 0·001, m”: P < 0·05 v. HC group. HC and CHYP groups were compared with N group; however, the CHY15 + H, CHY30 + H, CHY60 + H and LST + H groups were compared with HC group. N, normal; HC, cardiac hypertrophy; CHY, chrysin; CHYP, chrysin per se; LST, losartan; H, hypertrophy.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Effect of CHY on MAPK pathway protein expression. A: p38, P-p38 and P-p38/p38; B: ERK, P-ERK and P-ERK/ERK; and C: JNK, P-JNK and P-JNK/JNK. Data are expressed as mean of relative intensity w.r.t. normal group; n 3 in each group. P-value is represented as a: P < 0·001, a': P < 0·01 v. N group; m: P < 0·001, m': P < 0·01, m”: P < 0·05 v. HC group. HC and CHYP groups were compared with N group; however, the CHY15 + H, CHY30 + H, CHY60 + H and LST + H groups were compared with HC group. N, normal; HC, cardiac hypertrophy; CHY, chrysin; CHYP, chrysin per se; LST, losartan; H, hypertrophy.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Effect of CHY on inflammatory marker protein expression. A: NF-κB, P-NF-κB and P-NF-κB/NF-κB, and B: HMGB1. Data are expressed as mean of relative intensity w.r.t. normal group; n 3 in each group. P-value is represented as a: P < 0·001 v. N group; m: P < 0·001, m’: P < 0·01 v. HC group. HC and CHYP groups were compared with N group; however, the CHY15 + H, CHY30 + H, CHY60 + H and LST + H groups were compared with HC group. N, normal; HC, cardiac hypertrophy; CHY, chrysin; CHYP, chrysin per se; LST, losartan; H, hypertrophy.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Effect of CHY on fibrotic proteins expressions. A: SMAD 2, P-SMAD 2 and P-SMAD 2/ SMAD 2; B: SMAD 3, P-SMAD 3 and P-SMAD 3/ SMAD 3; C: P-SMAD 2/SMAD 2 to P-SMAD 3/SMAD 3; and D: TGF-β. Data are expressed as mean of relative intensity w.r.t. normal group; n 3 in each group. P-value is represented as a: P < 0·001 v. N group; m: P < 0·001, m': P < 0·01, m”: P < 0·05 v. HC group. HC and CHYP groups were compared with N group; however, the CHY15 + H, CHY30 + H, CHY60 + H and LST + H groups were compared with HC group. N, normal; HC, cardiac hypertrophy; CHY, chrysin; CHYP, chrysin per se; LST, losartan; H, hypertrophy.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Effect of CHY on antioxidant pathway protein expression. A: Nox4 and Nrf-2, and B: HO-1 and HSP70. Data are expressed as mean of relative intensity w.r.t. normal group; n 3 in each group. P-value is represented as a: P < 0·001 v. N group; m: P < 0·001 v. HC group. HC and CHYP groups were compared with N group; however, the CHY15 + H, CHY30 + H, CHY60 + H and LST + H groups were compared with HC group. N, normal; HC, cardiac hypertrophy; CHY, chrysin; CHYP, chrysin per se; LST, losartan; H, hypertrophy.