Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T12:35:15.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Swimming training combined with chitosan supplementation reduces the development of obesity and oxidative stress in high-fat diet-fed mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2021

Zahra Zalaqi
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Education, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Farshad Ghazalian*
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Education, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad Javad Khodayar
Affiliation:
Toxicology Research Center, Medical Basic Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran Department of Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Atefeh Raesi Vanani
Affiliation:
Toxicology Research Center, Medical Basic Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran Student Research Committee, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Layasadat Khorsandi
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Mohammad Reza Shushizadeh*
Affiliation:
Marine Pharmaceutical Science Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
*
*Corresponding authors: Farshad Ghazalian, email phdghazalian@gmail.com; Mohammad Reza Shushizadeh, email m.r.shushizadeh@gmail.com
*Corresponding authors: Farshad Ghazalian, email phdghazalian@gmail.com; Mohammad Reza Shushizadeh, email m.r.shushizadeh@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Obesity is often introduced as one of the metabolic disorders caused by imbalance between energy consumption and metabolisable energy intake. Experts in the field considered obesity as one of the robust risk factors for the lifestyle-associated diseases. The present research examined interventional effects of marine chitosan (CS), swimming training (ST) and combination of CS and ST (CS + ST) in the mice fed with high-fat diets (HFD). In this study, sample size was considered more than three in groups. Forty mice were randomly divided into five groups (n 8 per group) including control group (received the standard diet), HFD group (received high-fat food with 20 % fat), HFD + CS group (treated with high-fat food with 5 % CS), HFD + ST group (treated with HFD and ST) and HFD + CS + ST group (treated with high-fat food with 5 % CS and ST). After 8 weeks, the blood glucose, oxidative stress (OS) and lipid profile were measured. The results showed that CS + ST group has more effects in the control of body weight with the increased concentration of HDL-cholesterol, OS inhibition via enhancing the body antioxidant capacity in comparison with the ST or CS alone in HFD-fed mice. Moreover, lipid profile was improved in CS + ST-treated mice compared with HFD-treated mice, and OS inhibition correlated with the greater activities of the antioxidant enzyme enhances the lipid oxidation, cholesterol and fatty acid homoeostasis. The results suggested that a dietary intervention with a combined ST and CS can be a feasible supplementary for human prevention of obesity.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Effect of HFD + CS, HFD + ST and HFD + CS + ST on body weight gain and liver weight. Control; HFD; HFD + CS; HFD + ST; HDF + CS + ST

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Effect of HFD + CS, HFD + ST and HFD + CS + ST on food consumption in the five groups per week. Control; HFD; HFD + CS; HFD + ST; HDF + CS + ST

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Effect of HFD + CS, HFD + ST and HFD + CS + ST on blood glucose after 8-week period in the five groups. Values represent mean and their standard errors. *Significantly different from the control group (**P < 0·01).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Effect of HFD + CS, HFD + ST and HFD + CS + ST on TAG levels in mice. Values are mean and their standard errors. *Significantly different from the control group (**P < 0·01). #Significantly different from the HFD group (#P < 0·05, ###P < 0·001).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Effect of HFD + CS, HFD + ST and HFD + CS + ST on TC, HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels in mice. Values are mean and their standard errors. *Significantly different from the control group (**P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001). # Significantly different from the HFD group (#P < 0·05, ##P < 0·01, ###P < 0·001).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Effect of HFD + CS, HFD + ST and HFD + CS + ST on hepatic enzymes activity in HFD-induced oxidative stress in mice. Values are mean and their standard errors. *Significantly different from the control group (*P < 0·05, **P < 0·01). # Significantly different from the HFD group (#P < 0·05, ##P < 0·01).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Effect of HFD + CS, HFD + ST and HFD + CS + ST on MDA and GSH levels in liver tissues. Values are mean and their standard errors of the mean. *Significantly different from the control group (*P < 0·05, ***P < 0·001). # Significantly different from the HFD group (##P < 0·01).

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Effect of HFD + CS, HFD + ST and HFD + CS + ST on CAT, SOD and GPx activity. Values are mean and their standard errors. *Significantly different from the control group (***P < 0·001). # Significantly different from the HFD group (#P < 0·05, ##P < 0·01, ###P < 0·001).

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Effect of HFD + CS, HFD + ST and HFD + CS + ST on liver in the five experimental groups (H&E ×250). Black arrow indicates erythrocytes congestion, and yellow arrow indicates inflammation.