Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-9nbrm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T00:35:20.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surveillance of intestinal schistosomiasis during control: a comparison of four diagnostic tests across five Ugandan primary schools in the Lake Albert region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2018

Hajri Al-Shehri
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK Ministry of Health, Asir District, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Artemis Koukounari
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
Michelle C. Stanton
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK
Moses Adriko
Affiliation:
Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 1661, Kampala, Uganda
Moses Arinaitwe
Affiliation:
Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 1661, Kampala, Uganda
Aaron Atuhaire
Affiliation:
Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 1661, Kampala, Uganda
Narcis B. Kabatereine
Affiliation:
Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 1661, Kampala, Uganda
J. Russell Stothard*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
*
Author for correspondence: J. R. Stothard, E-mail: russell.stothard@lstmed.ac.uk

Abstract

Programmatic surveillance of intestinal schistosomiasis during control can typically use four diagnostic tests, either singularly or in combination, but these have yet to be cross-compared directly. Our study assembled a complete diagnostic dataset, inclusive of infection intensities, from 258 children from five Ugandan primary schools. The schools were purposely selected as typical of the endemic landscape near Lake Albert and reflective of high- and low-transmission settings. Overall prevalence was: 44.1% (95% CI 38.0–50.2) by microscopy of duplicate Kato-Katz smears from two consecutive stools, 56.9% (95% CI 50.8–63.0) by urine-circulating cathodic antigen (CCA) dipstick, 67.4% (95% CI 61.6–73.1) by DNA-TaqMan® and 75.1% (95% CI 69.8–80.4) by soluble egg antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (SEA-ELISA). A cross-comparison of diagnostic sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values was undertaken, inclusive of a latent class analysis (LCA) with a LCA-model estimate of prevalence by each school. The latter ranged from 9.6% to 100.0%, and prevalence by school for each diagnostic test followed a static ascending order or monotonic series of Kato-Katz, urine-CCA dipstick, DNA-TaqMan® and SEA-ELISA. We confirm that Kato-Katz remains a satisfactory diagnostic standalone in high-transmission settings but in low-transmission settings should be augmented or replaced by urine-CCA dipsticks. DNA-TaqMan® appears suitable in both endemic settings though is only implementable if resources permit. In low-transmission settings, SEA-ELISA remains the method of choice to evidence an absence infection. We discuss the pros and cons of each method concluding that future surveillance of intestinal schistosomiasis would benefit from a flexible, context-specific approach both in choice and application of each diagnostic method, rather than a single one-size fits all approach.

Information

Type
Special Issue Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (A) Schematic map of the five sampled primary schools in the Lake Albert region, the blue area indicates Lake Albert. (B) Estimated prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni by school for each examined diagnostic test; prevalence by any positive test criterion is also illustrated.

Figure 1

Table 1. Prevalence (%) of Schistosoma mansoni according to each diagnostic test across five primary schools with 95% confidence intervals

Figure 2

Table 2. Intensity of infection categories for Schistosoma mansoni by each examined diagnostic test across the five primary schools

Figure 3

Table 3. Empirical estimates of sensitivity (SS), specificity (SP), negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV), Cohen's kappa for each diagnostic test against urine-CCA dipstick as ‘gold standard’

Figure 4

Table 4. Latent class analysis (LCA) estimates of sensitivity and specificity and LCA model of prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni by school with 95% CIs for each diagnostic method