Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:23:00.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heterosexual Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

Marla Brettschneider
Marla Brettschneider
Affiliation:
University of New Hampshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Doing queer theory as political scientists enables us to approach central questions of the discipline in new and productive ways. This work makes possible innovative theoretical investigation of core concepts in political science such as power, justice, freedom, equality, and democracy. Queer theory can deepen the study of power by focusing on the lives, experiences, and institutions of GLBT people and communities. In the process, new frameworks are developed for the study of political theory more broadly. When done well, queer theory draws on the field's interdisciplinarity by bringing political scientists into conversation with other scholars on key matters that are best not bound by disciplinary borders. Similarly, queer theory at its best draws on the multiple perspectives developed in fields such as post-colonial, ethnic and critical race, feminist, class and ability, religious, and cultural studies.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 23 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brettschneider, Marla. 1997. The Family Flamboyant: Race Politics, Queer Families, Jewish Lives. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Burack, Cynthia. 2008. Sex, Sin, and Democracy: Antigay Rhetoric and the Christian Right. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, Susan. 2008. The Founding Fathers, Pop Culture, and Constitutional Law: Who's Your Daddy. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2000. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cahill, Sean, and Tobias, Sarah. 2007. Policy Issues Affecting Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Families. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Cathy. 1999. The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogg-Davis, Hawley. 2002. The Ethics of Transracial Adoption. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Morris. 1997. Sexual Justice: Democratic Citizenship and the Politics of Desire. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Novkov, Julie, and Barclay, Scott. 2010. “Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, and the Transgendered in Political Science: Report on a Discipline-Wide Survey.” PS: Political Science & Politics 43 (1): 95–106.Google Scholar
Phelan, Shane. 1989. Identity Politics: Lesbian Feminism and the Limits of Community. Philadelphia: Temple University PressGoogle Scholar
Phelan, Shane. 1994. Getting Specific: Postmodern Lesbian Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Phelan, Shane. 2001. Sexual Strangers: Gays, Lesbians, and Dilemmas of Citizenship. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Rollins, Joe. 2004. AIDS and the Sexuality of Law: Ironic Jurisprudence. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanley, Mary Lyndon. 2001. Making Babies, Making Families: What Matters Most in an Age of Reproductive Technologies, Surrogacy, Adoption, and Same-Sex and Unwed Parents. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Wilson, Angelia. 1999. Below the Belt: Sexuality, Religion, and the American South. London and New York: Cassell.Google Scholar