Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T23:00:36.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Serum metabolomics study of nutrient metabolic variations in chronic heat-stressed broilers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2018

Zhuang Lu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Origin Food Production and Safety Guarantee of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Meat Production and Processing, Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, People’s Republic of China
Xiaofang He
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Origin Food Production and Safety Guarantee of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Meat Production and Processing, Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, People’s Republic of China
Bingbing Ma
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Origin Food Production and Safety Guarantee of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Meat Production and Processing, Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, People’s Republic of China
Lin Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Origin Food Production and Safety Guarantee of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Meat Production and Processing, Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, People’s Republic of China
Jiaolong Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Origin Food Production and Safety Guarantee of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Meat Production and Processing, Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, People’s Republic of China
Yun Jiang
Affiliation:
Ginling College, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, People’s Republic of China
Guanghong Zhou
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Origin Food Production and Safety Guarantee of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Meat Production and Processing, Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, People’s Republic of China
Feng Gao*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Origin Food Production and Safety Guarantee of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Meat Production and Processing, Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, People’s Republic of China
*
* Corresponding author: F. Gao, fax +86 25 8439 5314, email gaofeng0629@sina.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To investigate the effects of heat stress on broiler metabolism, we assigned 144 broilers to normal control (NC), heat stress (HS) or pair-fed (PF) groups and then monitored the effects using growth performance, carcass characteristics, biochemical assays and GC-MS-based metabolomics. The up-regulation of cloacal temperature confirmed that our experiment was successful in inducing chronic heat stress. The average daily gain and average daily feed intake of the HS group were significantly lower than those of the NC group, by 28·76 and 18·42 %, respectively (P<0·001), whereas the feed:gain ratio was significantly higher, by 14·49 % (P=0·003), and heat stress also increased leg proportion (P=0·027) and intramuscular fat proportion (P<0·001) and decreased breast proportion (P=0·009). When comparing the HS and NC groups and HS and PF groups, our metabolomics approach identified seventy-eight and thirty-four metabolites, respectively, with significantly different levels (variable importance in the projection values >1 and P<0·05). The greater feed:gain ratio of the HS group was significantly positively correlated with the leg, abdominal fat, subcutaneous fat and intramuscular fat proportions and levels of some free amino acids (proline, l-cysteine, methionine and threonine) but was negatively correlated with breast proportion and levels of some NEFA (stearic acid, arachidonic acid, palmitic acid and oleic acid). These findings indicated that the heat-stressed broilers were in negative energy balance and unable to effectively mobilise fat, thereby resulting in protein decomposition, which subsequently affected growth performance and carcass characteristics.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Effects of heat exposure duration on the cloacal temperature of broilers. Values are means (n 6), and standard deviations represented by error bars. , normal control; , heat stress (HS); , pair-fed. * Significant difference between the HS group and the other two groups (P=0·002, 0·031, 0·009 and 0·023 at 2 h, 3 d, 7 d and 14 d of heat exposure, respectively).

Figure 1

Table 1 Effects of heat exposure on the growth performance of broilers (Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 2

Table 2 Effects of heat exposure on the carcass characteristics of broilers (Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 3

Fig. 2 The typical total ion chromatograms (TIC) of serum samples from broilers. , Normal control group; , heat stress group; , pair-fed group.

Figure 4

Fig. 3 Principal component analysis (PCA) based on the GC-MS spectra of quality control () samples and metabolites in serum samples obtained from the normal control (), heat stress () and pair-fed () groups.

Figure 5

Fig. 4 Score plot of orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analyses (OPLS-DA) derived from the GC-MS profiles of serum samples obtained from the heat stress (HS) group v. the normal control (NC) group (a) or the HS group v. the pair-fed (PF) group (b). The descriptive and predictive performance characteristics of the models are R2Y (cum)=0·972 and Q2 (cum)=0·695 for the HS group v. the NC group; R2Y (cum)=1 and Q2 (cum)=0·928 for the HS group v. the PF group. a: , NC; , HS; b: , HS; , PF.

Figure 6

Table 3 Metabolites with significantly different levels in the serum of heat stress (HS) and normal control (NC) broilers

Figure 7

Table 4 Metabolites with significantly different levels in the serum of heat stress (HS) and pair-fed (PF) broilers

Figure 8

Fig. 5 Metabolite set enrichment analysis was performed using all of the discriminating metabolites identified by the two individual orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analyses models. The most representative twelve metabolic pathways were obtained from the heat stress group v. the normal control group (a) or the heat stress group v. the pair-fed group (b). The ordinate represents −log(P). Bars that exceed the blue and red dotted lines indicate pathways with P values of <0·05 and <0·01, respectively. ABC, ATP-binding cassette.

Figure 9

Fig. 6 Heat map based on Pearson’s correlations of growth performance, carcass composition and some important perturbed metabolites related to amino acid and energy metabolism in heat stress and normal control broilers. The colour scale represents Pearson’s correlation coefficients, with red and blue representing positive and negative correlations, respectively. ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; F:G, feed:gain ratio.

Figure 10

Fig. 7 Effects of heat stress on the serum concentrations of uric acid and NEFA in broilers. (A) Comparison of uric acid levels (P<0·001). (B) Comparison of NEFA levels (P<0·001). Values are means (n 6), and standard deviations represented by error bars. NC, normal control group; HS, heat stress group; PF, pair-fed group. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

Figure 11

Fig. 8 Schematic overview of some important metabolites and major metabolic pathways related to amino acid and energy metabolism in heat-stressed broilers. , heat stress (HS) group v. normal control (NC) group up-regulation; , HS group v. NC group down-regulation; , HS group v. pair-fed (PF) group up-regulation; , HS group v. PF group down-regulation.