Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. European Commission Decisions on Competition
  • Cited by 19
      • Francesco Russo, Amsterdam Center for Law and Economics, University of Amsterdam; Bonelli Erede Pappalardo Law Firm; Italian Institute for European Studies, Maarten Pieter Schinkel, University of Amsterdam and Amsterdam Center for Law and Economics (ACLE), Andrea Günster, ETH Zurich and Amsterdam Center for Law and Economics (ACLE), Martin Carree, Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
      Show more authors
      • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      04 August 2010
      08 July 2010
      ISBN:
      9780511730078
      9780521117197
      9780521295642
      DOI:
      https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730078
      Dimensions:
      (247 x 174 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.99kg, 450 Pages
      Dimensions:
      (244 x 170 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.71kg, 450 Pages
      • Subjects:
      Economics, Industrial Economics, Law, Competition Law
    You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org
    Subjects:
    Economics, Industrial Economics, Law, Competition Law
    Information

    Book description

    European Commission Decisions on Competition provides a comprehensive economic classification and analysis of all European Commission decisions adopted pursuant to Articles 101, 102 and 106 of the FEU Treaty from 1962 to 2009. It also includes a sample of landmark European merger cases. The decisions are organised according to the principal economic theory applied in the case. For each economic category, the seminal Commission decision that became a reference point for that type of anticompetitive behaviour is described. For this, a fixed template format is used throughout the book. All subsequent decisions in which the same economic principle was applied are listed chronologically. It complements the most widely used textbooks in industrial organisation, competition economics and competition law, to which detailed references are offered. The book contains source material for teachers and students, scholars of competition law and economics, as well as practising competition lawyers and officials.

    Reviews

    Review of the hardback:'This book is an invaluable asset for associating theories from industrial economics with actual case studies. Organized by economic theories of harm, the basic facts and the Commission or Court’s analysis in dozens of cases are succinctly summarised. This is great material to get students thinking about how competition works, and is impeded, in practice. It is also a valuable reference work for practitioners and researchers.'

    Bruce Lyons - University of East Anglia

    Review of the hardback:'A selective, yet comprehensive, review of EU case law through the lens of economic principles. This was long overdue and will prove to be an essential tool for teachers and practitioners.'

    Damien Neven - Chief Competition Economist, DG Competition, European Commission

    Review of the hardback:'The authors have done an enormous amount of work to collect and classify - according to economic principles - all the European Commission’s antitrust decisions up until 2009. The result is a book that both practitioners and academics interested in competition policy will want to have on their desks as a reference tool.'

    Massimo Motta - Dean of the Barcelona Graduate School of Economics

    Review of the hardback:'This is an imaginative and well-chosen compilation of key decisions. The authors' review of the approach taken by the Commission in these cases allows the reader to appreciate the increased use of economic analysis by the Commission. A most useful text for those studying the impact of the more economics-based approach to competition law.'

    Giorgio Monti - London School of Economics

    Refine List

    Actions for selected content:

    Select all | Deselect all
    • View selected items
    • Export citations
    • Download PDF (zip)
    • Save to Kindle
    • Save to Dropbox
    • Save to Google Drive

    Save Search

    You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

    Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
    Cancel
    ×

    Contents

    Contents
    References
    Bibliography
    Areeda, P. and Turner, D. F. (1975), “Predatory Pricing and Related Practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Act,” Harvard Law Review, 88, 697–733
    Aigner, G., Budzinski, O., and Christiansen, A. (2006), “The Analysis of Coordinated Effects in EU Merger Control: Where Do We Stand After Sony/BMB and Impala?,” European Competition Journal, 2(2), 311–36
    Baker, J. B. (2003), “The Case for Antitrust Enforcement,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 27–50
    Bellamy, C. W. and Child, G. D. (2008), European Community Law of Competition, 6th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
    Bishop, S. and Walker, M. (2009), The Economics of EC Competition Law: Concepts, Applications and Measurements, 2nd edn., Thomson Sweet & Maxwell, London
    Bos, I. and Schinkel, M. P. (2006), “On the Scope for the European Commission's 2006 Fining Guidelines under the Legal Maximum Fine”, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2(4), 673–82
    Carlton, D. W. and Perloff, J. M. (2005), Modern Industrial Organization, 4th edn., Pearson Addison Wesley, Upper Saddle River, NJ
    Carree, M., Günster, A. M., and Schinkel, M. P. (2010), “European Antitrust Policy 1957–2004: An Analysis of Commission Decisions,” Review of Industrial Organization, forthcoming 2010
    Church, J. and Ware, R. (2000), Industrial Organization: A Strategic Approach, Irwin McGraw–Hill, Singapore
    Corwin, E. D. (1992), “Trends in Enforcement of the Antimonopoly Laws,” in Antitrust and Regulation, Edward Elgar, London, 110–18
    Davies, S. W., Driffield, L. N., and Clarke, R. (1999), “Monopoly in the UK: What Determines Whether the MMC Finds Against the Investigated Firms?,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 47, 263–83
    Duso, T., Gugler, K. P., and Yurtoglu, B. (2006), “How Effective is European Merger Control?”, WZB, Markets and Politics Working Paper, No. SP II 2006–12
    ,European Commission (1972), I Report on Competition Policy 1971, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
    ,European Commission (1973), II Report on Competition Policy 1972, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
    ,European Commission (1982), XI Report on Competition Policy 1981, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
    ,European Commission (1987), XVI Report on Competition Policy 1986, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
    ,European Commission (1994), XXIII Report on Competition Policy 1993, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
    ,European Commission (1999), XXVIII Report on Competition Policy 1998, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
    ,European Commission (2004), XXXIII Report on Competition Policy 2003, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
    ,European Commission (2007a), Report on Competition Policy 2005, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
    ,European Commission (2007b), Report on Competition Policy 2006, Online version.
    Gallo, J. C., Dau-Schmidt, K. G., Craycraft, J. L., and Parker, C. J. (1994), “Criminal Penalties under the Sherman Act: A Study of Law and Economics”, Research in Law and Economics, 16, 171–83
    Gallo, J. C., Dau-Schmidt, K. G., Craycraft, J. L., and Parker, C. J. (2000), “Department of Justice Antitrust Enforcement, 1955–1997: An Empirical Study”, Review of Industrial Organization, 17, 75–133
    Geradin, D. and Henry, D. (2005), “The EC Fining Policy for Violations of Competition Law: An Empirical Review of the Commission Decisional Practice and the Community Courts' Judgments”, European Competition Journal, 1(2), 401–73
    Ghosal, V. and Gallo, J. C. (2001), “The Cyclical Behavior of the Department of Justice Antitrust Enforcement Activity”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19, 27–54
    Gual, J. and Mas, N. (2005), “Industry Characteristics and Anti-Competitive Behaviour: Evidence from the EU”, University of Barcelona, Working Paper
    Gugler, Klaus, Mueller, Dennis, Yurtoglu, Burcin, and Zulehner, Christine (2003), “The Effects of Mergers: An International Comparison,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 625–53
    Harding, C. and Gibbs, A. (2005), “Why go to Court in Europe? An Analysis of Cartel Appeals 1995–2004”, European Law Review, 30, 349–62
    Harrington, J. E. (2006), “How Do Cartels Operate?”, Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics, 2(1), 1–105
    Jones, A. and Sufrin, B. (2008), EC Competition Law, 2nd edn., Oxford University Press, Oxford
    Jones, C. and Woude, M. (2006), EC Competition Law Handbook, 17th edn., Thomson Sweet & Maxwell, London
    Korah, V. (2006), Cases and Materials on EC Competition Law, 3rd edn., Hart Publishing, Portland, OR
    Kovacic, W. E. and Shapiro, C. (2000), “Competition Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal Thinking”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 43–60
    Lauk, M. (2002), “Econometric Analysis of the Decisions of the German Cartel Office”, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Working Paper
    Lin, P., Baldev, R., Sandfort, M., and Slottje, D. (2005), “The US Antitrust System and Recent Trends in Antitrust Enforcement”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 14, 255–306
    Lindsay, A. (2006), The EC Merger Regulation: Substantive Issues, 2nd edn., Thomson Sweet & Maxwell, London
    Lyons, B. R. (2004), “Reform of European Merger Policy”, Review of International Economics, 12, 246–61
    Martin, S. (1994), Industrial Economics: Economic Analysis, and Public Policy, Macmillan, New York
    Martin, S. (2002), Advanced Industrial Economics, 2nd edn., Blackwell, Oxford
    Martin, S. (2007), “The Goals of Antitrust and Competition Policy”, in Collins, W. D. (ed.), Issues in Competition Law and Economics, American Bar Association, 2007, Chicago, IL
    Monti, G. (2007), EC Competition Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
    Motta, M. (2004), Competition Policy: Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, New York
    Nillsen, T. (1997), “On the Consistency of Merger Policy”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 45, 89–100
    Posner, R. A. (1970), “A Statistical Study of Antitrust Enforcement”, Journal of Law and Economics, 13, 365–419
    Posner, R. A. (2001), Antitrust Law, 2nd edn., University of Chicago Press, Chicago
    Ritter, L. and Braun, W. D. (2005), European Competition Law: A Practitioner's Guide, 3rd edn., Kluwer Law International, London
    Roeller, L. H. and Stehmann, O. (2005), “The Year 2005 at DG Competition: The Trend towards a More Effects-Based Approach”, Review of Industrial Organization, 29, 281–304
    Russo, F. (2006), “Abuse of Protected Position? Minority Shareholdings and Restriction of Markets' Competitiveness in the European Union,” World Competition, 29(4), 607–33
    Stephan, A. (2009), “An Empirical Assessment of the Leniency Notice”, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 5, 537–61
    Tirole, J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
    Vogelaar, F. O. W. (2007), The European Competition Rules; Landmark Cases of the European Courts and the Commission, 2nd edn., Europa Law Publishing, Groningen
    Waldman, D. E. and Jensen, E. J. (2001), Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn., Addison Wesley Longman, Upper Saddle River, NJ
    Whish, R. (2008), Competition Law. Oxford University Press. Oxford

    Metrics

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.