Tables
2.2How Carroll’s four language aptitude components are tapped by the four MLAT-E parts
4.3Reliability Study 2 internal consistency and test–retest reliability results
4.5Reliability Study 3 internal consistency and test–retest results
5.1The number of reported correlations between LLAMA and L2 outcomes
6.6Correlation between FLAT-C, LLAMA, and English achievement
7.1Description of the sample: Age, gender, and length of residence at T1 (in months) of the adults (first row) and children (second row)
7.2Comparisons between the adults (first row) and children (second row) of the LAOC study and the combination (average) of the other studies on the LLAMA_B subtest: The contrasts are significant if the 95% CIs have a range that does not include 0 (0 indicating no difference)
7.3Comparisons between the adults (first row) and children (second row) of the LAOC study and the combination (average) of the other studies on the LLAMA_D subtest: The contrasts are significant if the 95% CIs have a range that does not include 0 (0 indicating no difference)
7.4Comparisons between the adults (first row) and children (second row) of the LAOC study and the combination (average) of the other studies on the LLAMA_E subtest: The contrasts are significant if the 95% CIs have a range that does not include 0 (0 indicating no difference)
7.5Comparisons between the adults (first row) and children (second row) of the LAOC study and the combination (average) of the other studies on the LLAMA_F subtest: The contrasts are significant if the 95% CIs have a range that does not include 0 (0 indicating no difference)
7.6Mean scores for each group of participants on each of the four LLAMA subtests
7.7Mean and SD scores of the adults (first row) and children (second row) on the verbal fluency task at the three data collection times
8.1Background data on Early Blind and Late Blind participants on the variable age of onset of blindness (AoB), in years
8.2Background data on Early Blind and Late Blind participants on the variable length of blindness (LoB), in years
12.1Differences between learners’ LA and WM developmental trajectory
12.2Significance values of learners’ intra-individual variability
14.1Grammaticality judgement test: Descriptive statistics for lower- versus higher-proficiency participants by group
14.2Elicited imitation test: Descriptive statistics for lower- versus higher-proficiency participants by group
14.3Scores on the LLAMA subtests for lower-proficiency participants
14.4Scores on the LLAMA subtests for higher-proficiency participants
14.5Significant predictors of the grammaticality judgement posttests for lower-level proficiency participants
14.6Significant predictors of the elicited imitation posttests for lower-level proficiency participants
14.7Significant predictors of the grammaticality judgement posttests for higher-level proficiency participants
14.8Significant predictors of the elicited imitation posttests for higher-level proficiency participants
15.1Descriptive statistics for language and aptitude measures for L2 learners
15.2Correlation coefficients (p values) between eye-tracking scores and aptitude scores
15.4Summary of previous research on implicit learning aptitude
18.1Advancements that can be achieved through the scientific study of language (Source: ALPAC, 1966, p. 44)