Wisdom, Morality, and Ethics

doi:10.1017/9781009085724.011

Chapter 8 - Wisdom, Morality, and Ethics

from Part II - Foundations of Wisdom in the Individual and in the World

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2022

Judith Glück and

Robert J. Sternberg

Edited by

Robert J. Sternberg and

Judith Glück

Show author details

Robert J. Sternberg: Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Judith Glück: Affiliation:
Universität Klagenfurt, Austria

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter summarized the theoretical and empirical relationships between wisdom and morality. Wise individuals are able to think carefully and rationally about moral dilemmas, recognizing their own intuitive impulses but not necessarily following them in making decisions. As they think about complex moral dilemmas, they aim to balance the different perspectives, interests, and needs optimally. Their value orientations are focused on a greater good that does not just include members of their own family or group but humanity and the world at large. Because they are good at thinking about moral issues and at dealing with the emotional and social aspects of complex situations, they are likely to also act ethically in difficult situations. Many of the great wisdom exemplars in history stood up for a just cause and accomplished major societal changes by peaceful means. We believe that the ethical aspect of wisdom is particularly important in a time where the world needs good decisions that do not focus on the needs of any particular nation or group. If we want to overcome serious world problems, such as climate change, global pandemics, and rising inequality, we need ethical and wise leaders.

Keywords

wisdom morality ethics moral dilemmas just cause values perspectives

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Psychology of Wisdom
An Introduction
, pp. 118 - 134

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009085724.011 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25(3), 275–324.CrossRef Google Scholar

Asadi, S., Khorshidi, R., and Glück, J. (2019). Iranian children’s knowledge about wisdom. Cognitive Development, 52, Article 100814.Google Scholar

Baltes, P. B. and Staudinger, U. M. (2000). A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122–36.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., and Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396–403.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Boehm, C. (1999). Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: a cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Speicher, B. et al. (1987). The Measurement of Moral Judgement: Volume 2, Standard Issue Scoring Manual. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Darley, J. M. and Batson, C. D. (1973). “From Jerusalem to Jericho”: a study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 100–8.CrossRef Google Scholar

Darley, J. M. and Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–83.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

De Waal, F. B. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279–300.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. The American Economic Review, 90(4), 980–94.Google Scholar

Glück, J. and Bluck, S. (2013). The MORE life experience model: a theory of the development of personal wisdom. In Ferrari, M. and Weststrate, N. M., eds., The Scientific Study of Personal Wisdom: From Contemplative Traditions to Neuroscience. Springer, pp. 75–97.Google Scholar

Glück, J., Gussnig, B., and Schrottenbacher, S. M. (2020). Wisdom and value orientations: just a projection of our own beliefs? Journal of Personality, 88(4), 833–55.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Graham, J., Haidt, J., and Nosek, B. A. (2008). The Moral Foundations Questionnaire. Downloaded from https://moralfoundations.org/questionnaires/.Google Scholar

Graham, J., Haidt, J., and Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–46.Google Scholar

Greene, J. (2013). Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them. Penguin.Google Scholar

Grossmann, I. (2017). Wisdom in context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 233–57.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Grossmann, I., Na, J., Varnum, M. E. W. et al. (2010). Reasoning about social conflicts improves into old age. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(16), 7246–50.Google Scholar

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–34.Google Scholar

Haidt, J. (2013). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. Vintage.Google Scholar

Jeste, D. V., Ardelt, M., Blazer, D. et al. (2010). Expert consensus on characteristics of wisdom: a Delphi method study. The Gerontologist, 50(5), 668–80.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kohlberg, L. (1958). The Development of Modes of Thinking and Choices in Years 10 to 16. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Kross, E. and Grossmann, I. (2012). Boosting wisdom: distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 43–48.Google Scholar

Kunzmann, U. and Baltes, P. (2003). Wisdom-related knowledge: affective, motivational, and interpersonal correlates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(9), 1104–19.Google Scholar

Latané, B. and Darley, J. M. (1970). Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn’t He Help? Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Latané, B. and Rodin, J. (1969). A lady in distress: inhibiting effects of friends and strangers on bystander intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(2), 189–202.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pasupathi, M. and Staudinger, U. M. (2001). Do advanced moral reasoners also show wisdom? Linking moral reasoning and wisdom-related knowledge and judgement. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(5), 401–15.Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L., Wehr, P., Harms, P. D., and Strasser, D. I. (2002). Use of exemplar surveys to reveal implicit types of intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(8), 1051–62.Google Scholar

Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., and Greene, J. D. (2012). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36(1), 163–77.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), Article 11. Downloaded from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/10687025.pdf CrossRef Google Scholar

Staudinger, U. M. (2019). The distinction between personal and general wisdom: How far have we come? In Sternberg, R. J. and Glück, J., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom. Cambridge University Press, pp. 182–201.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 347–65.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Epilogue: why is ethical behavior challenging? A model of ethical reasoning. In Sternberg, R. J. and Fiske, S. T., eds., Ethical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Cambridge University Press, pp. 219–26.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. and Glück, J. (2022). Wisdom: The Psychology of Wise Thoughts, Words, and Deeds. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Webster, J. D. (2010). Wisdom and positive psychosocial values in young adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 17(2), 70–80.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weststrate, N. M., Ferrari, M., and Ardelt, M. (2016). The many faces of wisdom: an investigation of cultural-historical wisdom exemplars reveals practical, philosophical, and benevolent prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 662–76.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.