A Philosophical Perspective on Qualitative Research in the Age of Digitalization

doi:10.1017/9781009106436.004

Chapter 2 - A Philosophical Perspective on Qualitative Research in the Age of Digitalization

from Part I - Philosophical, Epistemological and Theoretical Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 June 2023

Allen S. Lee and

Suprateek Sarker

Edited by

Boyka Simeonova and

Robert D. Galliers

Show author details

Boyka Simeonova: Affiliation:
University of Leicester
Robert D. Galliers: Affiliation:
Bentley University, Massachusetts and Warwick Business School

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The digitalization of business organizations and of society in general has opened up the possibility of researching behaviours using large volumes of digital traces and electronic texts that capture behaviours and attitudes in a broad range of natural settings. How is the availability of such data changing the nature of qualitative, specifically interpretive, research and are computational approaches becoming the essence of such research? This chapter briefly examines this issue by considering the potential impacts of digital data on key themes associated with research, those of induction, deduction and meaning. It highlights some of the ‘nascent myths’ associated with the digitalization of qualitative research. The chapter concludes that while the changes in the nature of data present exciting opportunities for qualitative, interpretive researchers to engage with computational approaches in the form of mixed-methods studies, it is not believed they will become the sine qua non of qualitative information systems research in the foreseeable future.

Keywords

big data qualitative research interpretive research philosophy induction deduction meaning grounded theory hermeneutics computational approaches mixed-methods

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Cambridge Handbook of Qualitative Digital Research , pp. 15 - 27

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009106436.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbasi, A., Sarker, S. and Chiang, R. (2016). Big data research in information systems: Toward an inclusive research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(2), i–xxxii.Google Scholar

Abramson, C. M., Joslyn, J., Rendle, K. A., Garrett, S. B. and Dohan, D. (2018). The Promises of computational ethnography: Improving transparency, replicability, and validity for realist approaches to ethnographic analysis. Ethnography, 19(2), 254–284.Google Scholar

Alvesson, M. and Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know. London and New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Berente, N., Seidel, S. and Safadi, H. (2019). Research commentary: Data-driven computationally intensive theory development. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 50–64.Google Scholar

Boswell, J. and Corbett, J. (2015). Embracing impressionism: Revealing the brush strokes of interpretive research. Critical Policy Studies, 9(2), 216–225.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cesare, N., Lee, H., McCormick, T., Spiro, E. and Zagheni, E. (2018). The promises and pitfalls of using digital traces for demographic research. Demography, 55(5), 1979–1999.Google Scholar

Dibbern, J., Winkler, J. and Heinzl, A. (2008). Explaining variations in client extra costs between software projects offshored to India. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 333–366.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P. (2015). Adapting computational text analysis to social science (and vice versa). Big Data & Society, 2(2), 1–5.Google Scholar

Dubé, L. and Paré, G. (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 597–636.Google Scholar

Eck, A. and Uebernickel, F. (2016). Reconstructing open source software ecosystems: Finding structure in digital traces. International Conference on Information Systems, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ghazawneh, A. and Henfridsson, O. (2013). Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173–192.CrossRef Google Scholar

Grover, V., Lindberg, A., Benbasat, I. and Lyytinen, K. (2020). The perils and promises of big data research in information systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(2), 268–293.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hirsch, E. D. (1967). Validity in Interpretation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Howison, J., Wiggins, A. and Crowston, K. (2011). Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12), 767–797.Google Scholar

Johnson, S. L., Gray, P. and Sarker, S. (2019). Revisiting IS research practice in the era of big data. Information and Organization, 29(1), 41–56.Google Scholar

Kaplan, A. (1964). The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. New York, NY: Chandler Publishing.Google Scholar

Kitchin, R. (2014). The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequence. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Klein, H. K. and Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–93.CrossRef Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1996). Aramis or the Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lazer, D., Pentland, A. S., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A.-L., Brewer, D. et al. (2009). Life in the network: The coming age of computational social science. Science, 323(5915), 721–723.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lee, A. S. (2017). Philosophy and method: Making interpretive research interpretive. In Galliers, R. D. and Stein, M.-K. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 30–46.Google Scholar

Lee, A. S. (1994). Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 143–157.Google Scholar

Lee, A. S. (1989). A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 33–50.Google Scholar

Lee, A. S. and Baskerville, R. (2003). Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 221–243.Google Scholar

Lee, A. S. and Hubona, G. S. (2009). A scientific basis for rigor in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 237–262.Google Scholar

Lindberg, A. (2020). Developing theory through human and machine pattern recognition. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(1), 90–116.Google Scholar

Lindberg, A., Berente, N., Gaskin, J., Lyytinen, K. and Yoo, Y. (2013). Computational approaches for analyzing latent social structures in open source organizing. International Conference on Information Systems, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar

Lohmeier, C. (2014). The researcher and the never-ending field: Reconsidering big data and digital ethnography. In Hand, M. and Hillyard, S. (eds), Big Data? : Qualitative Approaches to Digital Research. Bingley, UK: Emerald, pp. 75–89.Google Scholar

Markus, M. L. (1983). Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26(6), 430–444.Google Scholar

Mead, M. (1959a). Apprenticeship under Boas. In Goldschmidt, W. (ed.), The Anthropology of Franz Boas. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association, Memoir 89, pp. 29–45.Google Scholar

Mead, M. (1959b). Introduction. In R. Benedict, An Anthropologist at Work. London and New York, NY: Routledge, pp. xv–xxii.Google Scholar

Mohr, J. W., Wagner-Pacifici, R. and Breiger, R. (2015). Toward a computational hermeneutics. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 1–8.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nelson, L. (2020). Computational grounded theory: A methodological framework. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(1), 3–42.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pelto, P. J. (1970). Anthropological Research: The Structure of Inquiry. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Popper, K. (1968). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar

Rai, A. (2017). Avoiding type III errors: Formulating IS research problems that matter. MIS Quarterly, 41(2), iii–vii.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (1991). The model of the text: Meaningful action considered as a text. In From Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics, II. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 144–167.Google Scholar

Romele, A., Severo, M. and Furia, P. (2020). Digital hermeneutics: From interpreting with machines to interpretational machines. AI & Society, 35(1), 73–86.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, A. (1993). Hume and the philosophy of science. In Norton, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–89.Google Scholar

Sanday, P. (1979). The ethnographic paradigm(s). Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 527–538.Google Scholar

Sarker, S. and Lee, A. S. (2006). Does the use of computer-based BPC tools contribute to redesign effectiveness? Insights from a hermeneutic study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(1), 130–145.Google Scholar

Sarker, S. and Lee, A. S. (2002). Using a positivist case research methodology to test three competing practitioner theories-in-use of business process redesign. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2(1), 1–74.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sarker, S., Xiao, X, Beaulieu, T. and Lee, A. S. (2018). The practice of qualitative research in the IS discipline: An evolutionary view and some implications for authors and evaluators (Part I). Journal of the AIS, 19(8), 752–774.Google Scholar

Schutz, A. (1962). Concept and theory formation in the social sciences. In Natanson, M. (ed.), Alfred Schutz: Collected Papers 1. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 48–66.Google Scholar

Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (1971). Interpretation and the sciences of man. Review of Metaphysics, 25(1), 3–51.Google Scholar

Vaast, E., Safadi, H., Lapointe, L., and Negoita, B. (2017). Social media affordances for connective action: An examination of microblogging use during the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. MIS Quarterly, 41(4), 1179–1205.Google Scholar

Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A. and Sullivan, Y. W. (2016). Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(7), 435–494.Google Scholar

Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320–330.Google Scholar

Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74–81.Google Scholar

Wolcott, H. (1975). Criteria for an ethnographic approach to research in schools. Human Organization, 34(2), 111–128.Google Scholar

Wood, A. (2000). Hume: The problem of induction. Stanford University. www.stanford.edu/∼allenw/Phil102/Hume%20-%20Induction.doc.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.