III - Emotion and Morality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2026
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Sociopragmatics of Emotion , pp. 219 - 294Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
References
Alba-Juez, L. (2021). Affect and emotion. In Haugh, M., Kádár, D., & Terkourafi, M. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics (pp. 340–362). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108954105.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bens, J. (2017). Sentimentalizing and legal language: Affect and emotion in courtroom talk. Working Paper 04/17 Berlin. SFB 1171: 3–23.Google Scholar
Bergman Blix, S. & Minissale, A. (2022). (Dis)passionate law stories: The emotional processes of encoding narratives in court. Journal of Law and Society, 49, 245–262.10.1111/jols.12355CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blommaert, J. (2018a). Durkheim and the Internet: Sociolinguistics and the Sociological Imagination. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350055223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2018b). Chronotopes, synchronization and formats. Paper 207. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2019). Online with Garfinkel. In Blommaert, J., Szabla, M., Maly, I., Procházka, O., Ying, L., & Kunming, L. (eds.), Online with Garfinkel: Essays on Social Action in the Online–Offline nexus (pp. 3–6). Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies.Google Scholar
Carranza, I. E. (2007). Face, social practices, and ideologies in the courtroom. In Placencia, M. & García, (eds.), Research on Politeness in the Spanish-Speaking World (pp. 167–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carranza, I. E. (2008). Metapragmatics in a courtroom genre. Pragmatics, 18(2), 169–188.Google Scholar
Carranza, I. E. (2010). Roles situacionales y roles de participación: de las concepciones a las prácticas. In Bergoglio, M. Inés (ed.), Subiendo al Estrado. La Experiencia del Juicio por Jurado en Córdoba (pp. 239–256). Córdoba: Advocatus.Google Scholar
Carranza, I. E. (2013). Los índices metapragmáticos, la argumentación y el caso de la participación ciudadana en juicios penales. Spanish in Context, 10(3), 350–370.10.1075/sic.10.3.02carCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carranza, I. E. (2015). Narrating and arguing: From plausibility to local moves. In de Fina, A. & Georgakopolou, A. (eds.), Handbook of Narrative Analysis (pp. 57–75). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118458204.ch3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2021). Sociopragmatics: Roots and definition. In Haugh, M., Kádár, D., & Terkourafi, M. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics (pp. 15–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108954105.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J. & Haugh, M. (2014). Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-39391-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuoli, M. & Bednarek, M. (2022). Emotional labor in webcare and beyond: A linguistic framework and case study. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 256–270.10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73.10.1177/0957926507069457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. & Clayman, S. (2010) Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444318135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindholm, C. (2005). An anthropology of emotions. In Conerly, C. & Egerton, R (eds.), A Companion to Psychological Anthropology: Modernity and Psychocultural Change (pp. 30–47). London: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996409.ch3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locher, M. A. & Graham, S. L. (2021). Interpersonal pragmatics. In Haugh, M., Kádár, D., & Terkourafi, M. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics (pp. 569–591). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108954105.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, C. (2019). What matters. Cultural Anthropology, 32(2), 181–191.10.14506/ca32.2.02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matoesian, G. (2005). Struck by speech revisited: Embodied stance in jurisdictional discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9, 167–193.10.1111/j.1360-6441.2005.00289.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matoesian, G. (2008). You might win the battle but lose the war: Multimodal, interactive, and extralinguistic aspects of witness resistance. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(3), 195–219.10.1177/0075424208321202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matoesian, G. (2013). Language and material conduct. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(5), 634–660.10.1111/josl.12054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. (2012). Experiencing language. Anthropological Theory, 12(2), 142–160.10.1177/1463499612454088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, A. (2012). Epilogue: What does the study of interaction offer to emotion research? In Peräkylä, A. & Sorjonen, M.-L. (eds.), Emotion in Interaction (pp. 274–289). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, A. & Sorjonen, M.-L. (eds.) (2012). Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosaldo, R. (1996). Grief and a headhunter’s rage. In McGee, R. J. & Warms, R. (eds.), Anthropological Theory (pp. 167–177). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
Ruusuvuori, J. (2013). Emotion, affect and conversation. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (eds.), Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 330–349). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van De Mieroop, D. & Carranza, I. E. (2018). The interactional ventriloquization of written records in the service of authority. International Review of Pragmatics, 10(1), 1–28.10.1163/18773109-01001001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varis, P. & Blommaert, J. (2015). Conviviality and collectives on social media: Virality, memes, and new social structures. Multilingual Margins 2(1), 31–45.Google Scholar
Wilce, J. (2009b). Crying Shame: Metaculture, Modernity, and the Exaggerated Death of Lament. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilce, J. (2014). Current emotion research in linguistic anthropology. Emotion Review, 6(1), 77–85.10.1177/1754073913501396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Alba-Juez, L. (2018). Emotion and appraisal processes in language: How are they related? In de los Ángeles Gómez Gónzalez, M. & Mackenzie, J. L. (eds.), The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction (pp. 227–250). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.296.09albCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alba-Juez, L. (2021). Affect and emotion. In Haugh, M., Kádár, D., & Terkourafi, M. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics (pp. 340–362). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108954105.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alba-Juez, L. & Mackenzie, J. L. (2019). Emotion processes in discourse. In Mackenzie, J. L. & Alba-Juez, L. (eds.), Emotion in Discourse (pp. 3–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.302.01albCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alshammari, B. & Haugh, M. (2024). Troubles–complaints and the overall structural organisation of troubles–remedy sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 57(2), 215–234.10.1080/08351813.2024.2340405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arundale, R. (2010). Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2078–2105.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billig, M. (2001). Humour and embarrassment: Limits of ‘nice-guy’ theories of social life. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(5), 23–43.10.1177/02632760122051959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, L. & Petronio, S. (1998). Strategic embarrassment: The culprit of emotion. In Andersen, P. & Guerrero, L. (eds.), Handbook of Communication and Emotion: Research, Theory, Applications and Context (pp. 99–121). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chang, W. (2015). Face and Face Practices in Chinese Talk-in-Interaction. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Chang, W. & Haugh, M. (2011). Strategic embarrassment and face threatening in business interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2948–2963.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, W. & Haugh, M. (2013). ‘Face’ in Taiwanese business interactions: From emic concepts to emic practices. In Pan, Y. & Kádár, D. (eds.), Chinese Discourse and Interaction: Theory and Practice (pp. 126–150). London: Equinox.10.3138/9781781790229-008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choe, A. (2018). ‘Can anyone help her?’ Managing student embarrassment in the adult ESL classroom. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33, 16–35.Google Scholar
Clift, R. & Haugh, M. (2021). CA and sociopragmatics. In Haugh, M., Kádár, D., & Terkourafi, M. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics (pp. 616–638). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108954105.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J. & Tantucci, V. (2021). The principle of (im)politeness reciprocity. Journal of Pragmatics, 175, 146–164.10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelmann, Robert J. (1987). The Psychology of Embarrassment. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Edelmann, R. & Hampson, S. (1979). Changes in non-verbal behaviour during embarrassment. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(4), 385–390.10.1111/j.2044-8260.1979.tb00908.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, M., Willer, R. & Keltner, D. (2012). Flustering and faithful: Embarrassment as a signal of prosociality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 81–97.10.1037/a0025403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, G. (2009). Face and self in Chinese communication. In Bargiela-Chiappini, F. & Haugh, M. (eds.), Face, Communication and Social Interaction (pp. 175–191). London: Equinox10.3138/9781845537258-010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, G. & Ting-Toomey, S. (1998). Communicating Effectively with the Chinese. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781452220659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1956). Embarrassment and social organization. American Journal of Sociology, 62(3), 264–274.10.1086/222003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, D. (2001). Emotion. In Fraser, C. & Burchell, B. (eds.), Introducing Social Psychology (pp. 56–75). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 225–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. & Goodwin, C. (2001). Emotion within situated activity. In Duranti, A. (ed.), Linguistic Anthropology. A Reader (pp. 239–257). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gross, E. (1995). Embarrassment as social embodied experience. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 18: 263–282.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1990). Embarrassment: a conceptual analysis. In Crozier, W. R. (ed.), Shyness and Embarrassment (pp. 181–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511571183.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. (2006). Embarrassment: A form of social pain. American Scientist, 94(6), 524–533.10.1511/2006.62.1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M. (2012). Conversational interaction. In Allan, K. & Jaszczolt, K. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 251–274). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139022453.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M. (2015). Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110240078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M. & Chang, W. (2019). Indexical and sequential properties of criticisms in initial interactions: Implications for examining (im)politeness across cultures. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23(4), 904–929.10.22363/2687-0088-2019-23-4-904-929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M., Kádár, D. & Chang, W. (2015). ‘Doing deference’: Identities and relational practices in online discussion boards. Pragmatics, 25(1), 73–98.Google Scholar
Heath, C. (1988). Embarrassment and interactional organization. In Drew, P. & Wootton, A. (eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order (pp. 136–160). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Hebenstreit, B. & Zemel, A. (2021). Affect in interaction: Working out expectancies and responsibility in a phone call. In Robles, J. & Weatherall, A. (eds.), How Emotions are Made in Talk (pp. 51–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.321.02hebCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, A. & Bolden, G. (2017). Transcribing for Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781473920460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, D. Y.-F, Fu, W., & Ng, S. M. (2004). Guilt, shame and embarrassment: revelations of face and self. Culture & Psychology, 10(1), 64–84.10.1177/1354067X04044166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, K-K. (1987). Face and favour: the Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 944–974.10.1086/228588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, M. & Kristiansen, S. (2018). Embarrassment: Experiencing awkward self-awareness in everyday life. In Jacobsen, M. & Kristiansen, S. (eds.), Emotions, Everyday Life and Sociology (pp. 104–125). London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315207728-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner, G. (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp. 13–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jefCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D. (1995). Signs of appeasement: Evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement and shame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 441–454.10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D. & Anderson, C. (2000). Saving face for Darwin: The functions and uses of embarrassment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(6), 187–192.10.1111/1467-8721.00091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D. & Buswell, B. (1997). Embarrassment: Its distinct form and appeasement functions. Psychological Bulletin, 122(3), 250–270.10.1037/0033-2909.122.3.250CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlotz, A. & Locher, M. A. (2013). The role of emotions in relational work. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 87–107.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlotz, A. & Locher, M. A. (2017). (Im)politeness and emotion. In Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., & Kádár, D. (eds.), Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness (pp. 287–322). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, G. (2013). On the place of hesitating in delicate formulations: A turn-constructional infrastructure for collaborative indiscretion. In Hayashi, M., Raymond, G., & Sidnell, J. (eds.), Conversational Repair and Human Understanding (pp. 95–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (1995). Embarrassment: The emotion of self exposure and embarrassment. In Tangney, J. P. & Fischer, K. (eds.), Self-Conscious Emotions: The Psychology of Shame, Guilt, Embarrassment, and Pride (pp. 198–218). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Miller, R. (1996). Embarrassment: Poise and Peril in Everyday Life. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Miller, R. & Leary, M. (1992). Social sources and interactive functions of emotion: The case of embarrassment. In Clark, M. (ed.), Emotion and Social Behaviour (pp. 202–221). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Modigliani, A. (1968). Embarrassment and embarrassability. Sociometry, 31(3), 313–326.10.2307/2786616CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obana, Y. & Haugh, M. (2023). Sociopragmatics of Japanese: Theoretical Implications. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781003056645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petronio, S. (1999). Embarrassment. In Levinson, D., Ponzetti, J. Jr, & Jorgensen, P. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Human Emotions. Volume 1 (pp. 209–214). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (2007). The role of numbers and statistics within conversation analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 65–75.10.1080/19312450709336663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. & Kevoe-Feldman, H. (2010). Using full repeats to initiate repair on others’ questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(3), 232–259.10.1080/08351813.2010.497990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruusuvuori, J. (2013). Emotion, affect and conversation. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (eds.), Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 330–349). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simple systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2010). Ethnomethodology and the moral accountability of interaction: Navigating the conceptual terrain of ‘face’ and face-work. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2147–2157.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1987). Analysing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101–114.10.2307/2786745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1988). Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In Drew, P. & Wooton, A. (eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order (pp.89–135). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327.10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandlund, E. (2004). Feeling by doing. The social organisation of everyday emotions in academic talk-in-interaction. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Karlstad University.Google Scholar
Stevanovic, M. & Peräkylä, A. (2014). Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations. Language in Society, 43(1), 185–207.10.1017/S0047404514000037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangney, J. P. & Fischer, K. (eds.) (1995). Self-Conscious Emotions: The Psychology of Shame, Guilt, Embarrassment and Pride. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Weatherall, A. & Robles, J. (2021). How emotions are made to do things. In Robles, J. & Weatherall, A. (eds.), How Emotions Are Made in Talk (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Withers, L. (2016). Embarrassment. In Zeigler-Hill, V. & Shackleford, T. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1277–1279). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
References
Archer, D. & Jagodziński, P. (2015). Call centre interaction: A case of sanctioned face attack? Journal of Pragmatics, 76, 46–66.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. (2007). Reframing conflict in translation. Social Semiotics, 17(2), 151–69.10.1080/10350330701311454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilmes, J. (1988). The concept of preference in conversation analysis. Language in Society, 17, 161–181.10.1017/S0047404500012744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, D. (2006). The grand debate: Where next for politeness research? Culture, Language and Representation, 3(3), 9–15.Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, D. & Locher, M. (eds.). (2008). Impoliteness in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenneis, D. (1988). Language and disputing. Annual Review of Anthropology, 17, 221–237.10.1146/annurev.an.17.100188.001253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenneis, D. & Lein, L. (1977). ‘You fruithead’: A sociolinguistic approach to children’s dispute settlement. In Tripp, E. & Mitchell-Kernan, C. (eds.), Child Discourse (pp. 49–65). New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-241950-8.50009-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnahan, M. & Cai, D. (1996). Gender and aggression in the recognition of interruption. Discourse Processes, 21(2), 171–89.10.1080/01638539609544954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsaro, W. & Rizzo, T. (1990). Disputes in peer culture of American and Italian nursery-school children. In Grimshaw, A. (ed.), Conflict Talk (pp. 21–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349–367.10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J. & Haugh, M. (2014). Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-39391-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J. & Haugh, M. (2021). The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English: A corpus-based metapragmatic approach. Journal of Language, Aggression and Conflict, 9(2), 185–214.10.1075/jlac.00035.culCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2010). A genre approach to the study of im-politeness. International Review of Pragmatics, 2(1), 46–94.10.1163/187731010X491747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, D. & Tulgan, B. (2004). Managing Anger in the Workplace (1st edition) [electronic resource]. HRD Press.Google Scholar
Grainger, K. (2020). Take care of yourself: Negotiating moral and professional face in stroke rehabilitation. In Archer, D., Grainger, K., & Jagodziński, P. (eds.), Politeness in Professional Contexts (pp. 85–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.311.04graCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M. (2010). When is an email really offensive? Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(1), 7–31.10.1515/jplr.2010.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M. (2015). Impoliteness and taking offence in initial interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 36–42.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M. & Culpeper, J. (2018). Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Ilie, C. & Norrick, N. (eds.), Pragmatics and its Interfaces (pp. 213–240). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.294.10hauCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M., Kádár, D. & Terkourafi, M. (2021). Introduction: Directions in sociopragmatics. In Haugh, M., Kádár, D., & Terkourafi, M. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook in Sociopragmatics (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108954105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. & Lindstrom, A. (1998). Motherhood, medicine and morality: Scenes from a medical encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(3–4), 397–438.10.1207/s15327973rlsi3103&4_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and a resource. In Psathas, G. (ed.), Interactional Competence (pp. 63–92). Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139382717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kakavá, C. (2001) Discourse and conflict. In Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. (eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 650–670). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kienpointer, M. (1997). Varieties of rudeness: Types and functions of impolite utterances. Functions of Language, 4(2), 251–287.10.1075/fol.4.2.05kieCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, H. (1993). Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society, 22, 193–216.10.1017/S0047404500017103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972a). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972b). Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1979). Activity types and language. Linguistics, 17(5–6), 365–399.10.1515/ling.1979.17.5-6.365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1992). Activity types and language. In Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 66–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locher, M. A. (2004). Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110926552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell-Kernan, C. & Kernan, K. (1975). Children’s insults: America and Samoa. In Sanches, M. & Blount, B. (eds.), Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use (pp. 307–315). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V. & Tayebi, T. (2021). Taking offence at the (un)said: Towards a more radical contextualist approach. Journal of Politeness Research, 17(1), 111–131.10.1515/pr-2020-0032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1975). Second assessments: A study of some features of agreements/disagreements. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Santamaría-García, C. (2011). Bricolage assembling: CL, CA and DA to explore the negotiation of agreement in English and Spanish conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(3), 345–370.10.1075/ijcl.16.3.04sanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santamaría-García, C. (2023). How can I help you? Exploring face in a corpus of telephone interpreting. Corpus Pragmatics, 7(1), 1–15.10.1007/s41701-022-00130-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005). (Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 95–119.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2013). Relating at work: Facets, dialectics and face. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 121–137.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. (1989). Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tayebi, T. (2016). Why do people take offence? Exploring the underlying expectations. Journal of Pragmatics, 101, 1–17.10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayebi, T. (2018). Implying an impolite belief: A case of Tikkeh in Persian. Intercultural Pragmatics, 15(1). 89–113.10.1515/ip-2017-0031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112.10.1093/applin/4.2.91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuchinich, S. (1990). The sequential organisation of closing in verbal family conflict. In Grimshaw, A. D. (ed.), Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversation (pp. 118–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, R. (2008). Rudeness, conceptual blending theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 4(2), 289–317.10.1515/JPLR.2008.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter
conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic
(A)
level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.