Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6bnxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-16T06:08:05.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Understanding the New Immigration Challenge

A Psychological Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2026

Fathali M. Moghaddam ,
Margaret J. Hendricks  and
Raimundo Salas-Schweikart
Fathali M. Moghaddam
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Margaret J. Hendricks
Affiliation:
US Citizenship and Immigration Services Agency
Raimundo Salas-Schweikart
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The New Immigration Challenge
A Psychological Exploration Toward Solutions
 , pp. 19 - 86
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2026

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Bansak, C., Simpson, N., & Zavodny, M. (2020). The economics of immigration. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esterline, C., & Batalova, J. (2022). Frequently requested statistics on immigrants. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/source_images/FRS2022-print_version_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1999). Trust and its surrogates: Psychological foundations of political process. In Warren, M. E. (Ed.), Democracy & trust (pp. 249–272). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Mackie, C., & Blau, F. D. (Eds.). (2017). The economic and fiscal consequences of immigration. National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2019). Threat to democracy: The appeal of authoritarianism in a time of uncertainty. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Simms, N. (2019). The Italian-American image during the twentieth century. The Histories, 5(1), 4.Google Scholar
Salomone, R., & Salomone, R. C. (2022). The rise of English: Global politics and the power of language. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M. (2024). British citizens should be asked to do more. Financia.Google Scholar

References

Abascal, M. (2015). Us and them: Black-white relations in the wake of Hispanic population growth. American Sociological Review, 80, 789–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alba, R. (2020). The great demographic illusion: Majority, minority, and the expanding American mainstream. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Haim, Y., Ziv, T., Lamy, D., & Hodes, R. M. (2006). Nature and nurture in own-race face processing. Psychological Science, 17, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 193–281). McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. Sage.Google Scholar
Borjas, G. J. (2019). Immigration and economic growth. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 25836. www.nber.org/papers/w25836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonikowski, B. (2016). Nationalism in settled times. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brader, T., Valentino, N. A., & Suhay, E. (2008). What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 959–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1956). Enhancement of contrast as a composite habit. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56, 350–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavez, L. (2020). The Latino threat: Constructing immigrants, citizens, and the nation. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, M. A., & Richeson, J. A. (2014). More diverse yet less tolerant? How the increasingly diverse racial landscape affects white Americans’ racial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 750–761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, M. A., Rucker, J. M., & Richeson, J. A. (2018). Racial and political dynamics of an approaching “majority–minority” United States. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 677, 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Routledge.Google ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press. 2nd ed.Google Scholar
De Coninck, D. (2023). The refugee paradox during wartime in Europe: How Ukranian and Afghan are (not) alike. International Migration Review, 57, 578–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, W. D. (1959). Source book of Gestalt psychology. Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1921[1955]). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In Strachey, J. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 18, pp. 67–143). Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1930[1961]). Civilization and its discontents. In Strachey, J. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 64–145). Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Guimond, S., & Dubé-Simard, L. (1983). Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec nationalist movement: The cognition –emotion distinction and the personal-group deprivation issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 526–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, G. (2011). Political threat and immigration: Party identification, demographic context, and immigration policy preference. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 404–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, P. R. (2020). Stereotypes and the construction of the social world. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hughes, B. L., Camp, N. P., Gomez, J., Natu, V. S., Grill-Spector, K., & Eberhardt, L. (2019). Neural adaptation to faces reveals racial outgroup homogeneity effects in early perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 116, 14532–14537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joppke, C. (2020). Immigration in the populist crucible: Comparing Brexit and Trump. Comparative Migration Studies, 8, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00208-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2018). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal implications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 263–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Farrar, Struas and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kazin, M. (2016). Trump and American populism: Old wine, new bottles. Espirit, Nov/Dec, 42–53.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. (2018). Trump wants fewer immigrants from “shithole countries” and more from places like Norway. www.vox.com/2018/1/11/16880750/trump-immigrants-shithole-countries-norwayGoogle Scholar
Kotsoni, E., De Haan, M., & Jounson, M. H. (2001). Categorical perception of facial expression by 7-month-old infants. Perception, 30, 1115–1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, W., Thomas, E., McGarty, C., Lizzio-Wilson, , Amiot, C., & Moghaddam, F. M. (2020). The volatility of collective action: Theoretical analysis and empirical data. Political Psychology, 41, 35–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, B., Blodorn, A. & Major Blascovich, G. (2018). The threat of increasing diversity: Why many White Americans support Trump in the 2016 presidential election. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 931–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus-Newhall, A., Pederson, W. C., Carlson, M., & Miller, N. (2000). Displaced aggression is alive and well: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 670–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathisen, R. W. (2006). Peregrini, Barbari, and Cives Romani: Concepts of citizenship and the legal identity of barbarians in the later Roman empire. The American Historical Review, 111, 1011–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, T. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2008). Multiculturalism and intergroup relations: Psychological implications for democracy in global context. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2022). How psychologists failed: We neglected the poor and minorities, favored the rich and privileged, and got science wrong. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2023). Political plasticity: The future of democracy and dictatorship. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2024). The psychology of revolution. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M., & Stringer, P. (1986). “Trivial” and “important” criteria for social categorization in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, S. L., & Lee, J. (2018). Trump voters and the white working class. Sociological Science, 5, 234–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mummendey, A., Klink, A., & Brown, R. (2001). Nationalism and patriotism: National identification and outgroup rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakes, P. J., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Is limited information capacity the cause of social stereotyping? In Stroebe, W. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 111–135). Wiley.Google Scholar
Osbeck, L., Moghaddam, F. M., & Perreault, S. (1977). Similarity and attraction among majority and minority groups in a multicultural context. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of outgroup homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of ingroup and outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. (2008). Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (Trans. A. Goldhammer). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, P. C., Uttley, L., Lee, K., Gibson, A., Smith, M., et al., (2008). Infant preference for female faces occurs for same – but not other – race faces. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, J. L., Langlois, J. H., Hoss, R. A., Rubenstein, A. J., & Griffin, A. M. (2004). Origins of a stereotype: Categorization of facial attractiveness by 6-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 7, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinert, S., Hübener, M., Bonhoeffer, T., & Goltstein, P. M. (2021). Mouse prefrontal cortex represents learned rules for categorization. Nature, 593, 411–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, M., & Baron, A. (2019). The development of social categorization. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 1, 359–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B. B. (Eds.) (1978). Cognition and categorization. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M., Davis-Stitt, C., & Hill, J. (1997). Effects of arbitrarily placed category boundaries on similarity judgements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 122–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas-Schweikart, R., Hendricks, M. J., Boychuck, M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (2024). Similarity-attraction across ethnic, religious, and political groups: Does celebrating differences or similarities make a difference?. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1–20.Google Scholar
Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation: Their social psychology. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sherman, A., Trisi, D., Stone, C., Gonazalas, S., & Parrott, S. (2019). Immigrants contribute greatly to US economy, despite administration’s “public charge” rule rationale. Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, www.jstor.org/stable/resrep27232Google Scholar
Siuda-Krzywicka, K., Witzel, C., Bartolomeo, P., & Cohen, L. (2021). Color naming and categorization depend on distinct functional brain networks. Cerebral Cortex, 31, 1106–1115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staub, E. (1997). Blind versus constructive patriotism: Moving from embeddedness in the group to critical loyalty and action. In Bar-Tal, D. & Staub, E. (Eds.), Patriotism in the lives of individuals and nations (pp. 213–228). Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1959). Quantitative judgement in social perception. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 16–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Tajfel, H. (Ed.) (1978). Differentiation between social groups. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., Flament, C., Billig, M. G., & Bundy, R. F. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgement. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives. Praeger. 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Van den Berghe, P. (1987). The ethnic phenomenon. Praeger.Google Scholar
Weber, H. (2015). National and regional proportion of immigrants and perceived threat of immigration: A three-level analysis in Western Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 56, 116–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, M. S. (1982). Cross-cultural studies of minimal groups: Implications for social identity theory and intergroup relations. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 207–240). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Balliet, D., Wu, J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1556–1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037737CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baquiran, C. L. C. (2020). A doctor’s foreign accent affects perceptions of competence. Health Communication, 35(6), 726–730. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1584779CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Budescu, D. V., & Budescu, M. (2012). How to measure diversity when you must. Psychological Methods, 17(2), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çakal, , H., Halabi, , S., Cazan, , A.-M., & Eller, , A. (2021). Intergroup contact and endorsement of social change motivations: The mediating role of intergroup trust, perspective-taking, and intergroup anxiety among three advantaged groups in Northern Cyprus, Romania, and Israel. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219885163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriere, K. R., Hallahan, A., & Moghaddam, F. M. (2022). The effect of perceived threat on human rights: A meta-analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(1), 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220962563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central Intelligence Agency. (n.d.). The world factbook: India. Retrieved August 21, 2024, from www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/india/#people-and-societyGoogle Scholar
Cettolin, E., & Suetens, S. (2019). Return on trust is lower for immigrants. The Economic Journal, 129(621), 1992–2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuadrado, I., López-Rodríguez, L., & Constantin, A. A. (2020). A matter of trust: Perception of morality increases willingness to help through positive emotions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(3), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219838606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, C. (2019). How persistent is generalised trust? Sociology, 53(3), 590–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517718991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Haas, H. de, Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2020). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. Red Globe Press. 6th ed.Google Scholar
Dinesen, P. T., Schaeffer, M., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2020). Ethnic diversity and social trust: A narrative and meta-analytical review. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 441–465. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052918-020708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erisen, C., & Kentmen-Cin, C. (2017). Tolerance and perceived threat toward Muslim immigrants in Germany and the Netherlands. European Union Politics, 18(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116516675979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esses, V. M. (2021). Prejudice and discrimination toward immigrants. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 503–531. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-080520-102803CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EVS/WVS. (2021). Joint EVS/WVS 2017-2021 Dataset (Joint EVS/WVS) (Version 2.0.0) [Dataset]. World Values Survey Association. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.14Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press.Google Scholar
Greene, K., Rossiter, E., Seira, E., & Simpser, A. (2023). Interacting as Equals: How contact can promote tolerance among opposing partisans. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4456223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, F. G. (2022). How impressions of public employees’ warmth and competence influence trust in government. International Public Management Journal, 25(6), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2021.1963361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Voci, A., Hamberger, J., & Niens, U. (2006). Intergroup contact, forgiveness, and experience of “the troubles” in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 62(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00441.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. K., & Stoker, L. (2004). Social trust and civic engagement across time and generations. Acta Politica, 39(4), 342–379. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtug, N. (2021). The politics of social cohesion: Immigration, community, and justice. Oxford University Press. 1st ed. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198797043.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, M. (2007). Social capital and diversity generalized trust, social cohesion and regimes of diversity. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 709–732. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423907070722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, P., & Scartascini, C. (2022). Trust: The key to social cohesion and growth in Latin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0003792Google Scholar
Kende, J., Phalet, K., Van Den Noortgate, W., Kara, A., & Fischer, R. (2018). Equality revisited: A cultural meta-analysis of intergroup contact and prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 887–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617728993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 414–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, R. (2010). Trade-offs between equality and difference: Immigrant integration, multiculturalism and the welfare state in cross-national perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830903250881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R. M. (2018). Ingroup-outgroup trust. barriers, benefits, and bridges. In Uslaner, E. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social and political trust (pp. 95–115). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kunovich, R. M. (2013). Labor market competition and anti-immigrant sentiment: Occupations as contexts. International Migration Review, 47(3), 643–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyeremeh, E., Arku, G., Mkandawire, P., Cleave, E., & Yusuf, I. (2021). What is success? Examining the concept of successful integration among African immigrants in Canada. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(3), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1639494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2006). Not an outgroup, not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the Stereotype Content Model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 751–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaine, G. (1974). Social differentiation and social originality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4(1), 17–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420040103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R., Lalonde, R. N., & Esses, V. M. (2010). Bias against foreign-born or foreign-trained doctors: Experimental evidence. Medical Education, 44(12), 1241–1247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lončar, J. (2023). Evoking the resemblance: Descriptive representation of ethnic minorities. Ethnicities, 146879682311665. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968231166514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, L., & Johnson, M. (2007). Resources, group conflict and symbols: Explaining anti-immigration hostility in Britain. Political Studies, 55(4), 709–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00680.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meer, T. V. D., & Tolsma, J. (2014). Ethnic diversity and its effects on social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migration Data Portal. (n.d.. International Data. Retrieved December 11, 2023, from www.migrationdataportal.org/international-dataGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2008). Multiculturalism and intergroup relations: Psychological implications for democracy in global context. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11682-000Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2024). The psychology of multiculturalism, assimilation, and omniculturalism. Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oleszkiewicz, A., & Lachowicz-Tabaczek, K. (2016). Perceived competence and warmth influence respect, liking and trust in work relations. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 47(4), 431–435. https://doi.org/10.1515/ppb-2016-0050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, K. W., Kim-Jun, S. Y., & Shim, S.-H. (2011). The value of diversity in organizations: A social psychological perspective. In Social psychology and organizations (pp. 253–271). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250556.n9Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century, the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rempel, M. W., & Fisher, R. J. (1997). Perceived threat, cohesion, and group problem solving in intergroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8(3), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renström, E. A., Bäck, H., & Carroll, R. (2023). Threats, emotions, and affective polarization. Political Psychology, 44(6), 1337–1366. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rios, K., Sosa, N., & Osborn, H. (2018). An experimental approach to intergroup threat theory: Manipulations, moderators, and consequences of realistic vs. symbolic threat. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 212–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1537049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotella, K. N., Richeson, J. A., Chiao, J. Y., & Bean, M. G. (2013). Blinding trust: The effect of perceived group victimhood on intergroup trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212466114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rotenberg, K. J. (2010). The conceptualization of interpersonal trust: A basis, domain, and target framework. In Rotenberg, K. J. (Ed.), Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence (1st ed., pp. 8–27). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750946.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust1. Journal of Personality, 35(4), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, K., Ramiah, A. A., & Hewstone, M. (2014). Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup contact and perceived threat. Psychological Science, 25(3), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508956CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation. Routiedge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Steele, L. G., Bostic, A., Lynch, S. M., & Abdelaaty, L. (2022). Measuring Ethnic Diversity. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-015435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G., Lausanne Renfro, C., Esses, V. M., White Stephan, C., & Martin, T. (2005). The effects of feeling threatened on attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.04.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination. (pp. 23–45). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Stolle, D., Petermann, S., Schmid, K., Schönwälder, K., Hewstone, M., Vertovec, S., Schmitt, T., & Heywood, J. (2013). Immigration-related diversity and trust in German cities: The role of intergroup contact. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 23(3), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2013.809350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timberlake, J. M., Howell, J., Grau, A. B., & Williams, R. H. (2015). Who “they” are matters: Immigrant stereotypes and assessments of the impact of immigration. The Sociological Quarterly, 56(2), 267–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/tsq.12076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420090207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uslaner, E. M. (2017). Trust. In Moghaddam, F. M. (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of political behavior (1st ed., pp. 855–858). SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Van Assche, J., Ardaya Velarde, S., Van Hiel, A., & Roets, A. (2023). Trust is in the eye of the beholder: How perceptions of local diversity and segregation shape social cohesion. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1036646. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1036646CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Knippenberg, D. V., Nishii, L. H., & Dwertmann, D. J. G. (2020). Synergy from diversity: Managing team diversity to enhance performance. Behavioral Science, 6(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/237946152000600108Google Scholar
VandenBos, G. R. (2015). APA dictionary of psychology. American Psychological Association. 2nd ed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voci, A. (2006). The link between identification and in-group favouritism: Effects of threat to social identity and trust-related emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X52245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisel, O., & Zultan, R. (2021). Perceived level of threat and cooperation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 704338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, A., Burgmer, P., & Hofmann, W. (2022). The experience of trust in everyday life. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, A., Michels, C., Burgmer, P., Mussweiler, T., Ockenfels, A., & Hofmann, W. (2021). Trust in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000334CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkes, R., & Wu, C. (2018). Trust and minority groups. In Uslaner, E. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social and political Trust (pp. 231–250). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, N., Lu, H. J., & Chang, L. (2021). Trust as social investment: A life-history model of environmental effects on ingroup and outgroup trust. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110303CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Abidde, S. O., & Matambo, E. K. (Eds.). (2021). Xenophobia, nativism and pan-Africanism in twenty-first century Africa: History, concepts, practice and case study. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Rawashdeh, M. S. (2014). The impact of globalization on the political culture of the Arab youths. Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia), 8(4), 81–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/19370679.2014.12023250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alba, R., Rumbaut, R. G., & Marotz, K. (2005). A distorted nation: Perceptions of racial/ethnic group sizes and attitudes toward immigrants and other minorities. Social Forces, 84(2), 901–919. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Arau, S. (Director). (2004, May 14). A day without a Mexican [Comedy]. Eye On The Ball Films, Instituto Mexicano de Cinematografía, Jose and Friends Inc., Plural Entertainment, RTG Productions.Google Scholar
Ariely, G. (2021). State of nationalism (SON): Nationalism and globalization. Studies on National Movements, 8, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badea, C., Iyer, A., & Aebischer, V. (2018). National identification, endorsement of acculturation ideologies and prejudice: The impact of the perceived threat of immigration. International Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baerg, N. R., Hotchkiss, J. L., & Quispe-Agnoli, M. (2014). Unauthorized immigration, fiscal conservatism, and partisan support for the republicans [MPRA Paper No. 64839,]. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/64936Google Scholar
Ben-Nun Bloom, P., Arikan, G., & Lahav, G. (2015). The effect of perceived cultural and material threats on ethnic preferences in immigration attitudes. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(10), 1760–1778. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1015581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessudnov, A. (2016). Ethnic hierarchy and public attitudes toward immigrants in Russia. European Sociological Review, 32(5), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bier, D. J. (2022, September 14). Fentanyl is smuggled for US citizens by US citizens, not asylum seekers [Cato Institute]. Cato at Liberty. www.cato.org/blog/fentanyl-smuggled-us-citizens-us-citizens-not-asylum-seekersGoogle Scholar
Binder, N. E., Polinard, J. L., & Wrinkle, R. D. (1997). Mexican American and Anglo attitudes toward immigration reform: A view from the border. Social Science Quarterly, 78(2), 324–337.Google Scholar
Bongiorno, J. (2024, April 30). Canada is scaling back temporary foreign workers. Critics say the program needs an overhaul. CBC News. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/temporary-foreign-workers-reduction-rights-permanent-status-1.7155233Google Scholar
Bose, P. S. (2018). Welcome and hope, fear, and loathing: The politics of refugee resettlement in Vermont. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boundless Immigration. (2022, November 30). Migrant worker controversy behind the scenes of Qatar’s World Cup: Boundless dives into the migrant workforce controversy surrounding the World Cup. Boundless Immigration. www.boundless.com/blog/qatar-world-cup-migrant-workers/#:~:text=Qatar%27s%20population%20also%20increased%20by,country%20to%20fill%20open%20positions.Google Scholar
Brader, T., Valentino, N. A., & Suhay, E. (2008). What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 959–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00353.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branton, R., Dillingham, G., Dunaway, J., & Miller, B. (2007). Anglo voting on nativist ballot initiatives: The partisan impact of spatial proximity to the US-Mexico border. Social Science Quarterly, 88(3), 882–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabaniss, E. R., & Cameron, A. E. (2018). Toward a social psychological understanding of migration and assimilation. Humanity & Society, 42(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597617716963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callens, M.-S., & Meuleman, B. (2017). Do integration policies relate to economic and cultural threat perceptions? A comparative study in Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 58(5), 367–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715216665437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1965). Ethnocentrism and other altruistic motives. In Levine, D., (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 13, pp. 283–311). University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Cervantes, A. G., Alvord, D., & Menjívar, C. (2018). “Bad hombres”: The effects of criminalizing Latino immigrants through law and media in the rural Midwest. Migration Letters, 15(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v15i2.368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chand, D. E., & Schreckhise, W. D. (2015). Secure communities and community values: Local context and discretionary immigration law enforcement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(10), 1621–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2014.986441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, M. A., & Richeson, J. A. (2017). Information about the US racial demographic shift triggers concerns about anti-White discrimination among the prospective White “minority.” PLOS ONE, 12(9), e0185389. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185389CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daghrir, W. (2013). Globalization as Americanization? Beyond the conspiracy theory. IOSR Journal of Applied Physics, 5(2), 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dambrun, M., Taylor, D. M., McDonald, D. A., Crush, J., & Méot, A. (2006). The relative deprivation–gratification continuum and the attitudes of South Africans toward immigrants: A test of the V-curve hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1032–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1032CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danbold, F., & Huo, Y. J. (2015). No longer “All-American”? Whites’ defensive reactions to their numerical decline. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(2), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614546355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, J., & Zirkel, S. (2012). Globalization, psychology, and social issues research: An introduction and conceptual framework. Journal of Social Issues, 68(3), 439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollard, J., Bood, L., Miller, N., Mowrer, O., & Sears, R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dube, G. (2017). Levels of othering: The case of Zimbabwean migrants in South Africa. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 23(4), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2017.1380458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dube, G. (2019). Black South Africans’ attitudes toward African immigrants between 2008 and 2016. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 25(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2019.1602372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emeriau, M. (2022). Learning to be unbiased: Evidence from the French asylum office. American Journal of Political Science, 67(4), 1117–1133. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enos, R. D. (2017). The space between us: Social geography and politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, A. (2022, September 14). The limitations of humanity: Differential refugee treatment in the EU. Harvard International Review. https://hir.harvard.edu/the-limitations-of-humanity-differential-refugee-treatment-in-the-eu/#:~:text=How%20are%20Ukrainian%20and%20non,no%20official%20asylum%20approval%20necessary.Google Scholar
Frey, A. (2021). Getting under the skin: The impact of terrorist attacks on native and immigrant sentiment. Social Forces, 101(2), 943–973. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soab135Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Lyons, S. L., & Lun, J. (2011). Toward a psychological science of globalization. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4), 841–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemignani, M., & Hernandez-Albujar, Y. (2015). Hate groups targeting unauthorized immigrants in the US: Discourses, narratives and subjectivation practices on their websites. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(15), 2754–2770. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1058967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, B., Daukei, R., Sotelo, L., & Chambers, S. N. (2023). Out of sight and out of mind: An interpretative human rights report on US-Mexico border violence under MPP and Title 42. Indigenous Alliance without Borders, Center for Mexican Studies, Latin American Institute. www.indigenousalliance.org/_files/ugd/7c2cd7_a4025398ffce42aca2dacc06fc6e995d.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gordon, S. (2015). Xenophobia across the class divide: South African attitudes toward foreigners 2003–2012. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 33(4), 494–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2015.1122870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, S. (2017). A desire for isolation? mass public attitudes in South Africa toward immigration levels. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 15(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2016.1151096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorodzeisky, A., & Semyonov, M. (2019). Unwelcome immigrants: Sources of opposition to different immigrant groups among Europeans. Frontiers in Sociology, 4, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gravelle, T. B. (2018). Politics, time, space, and attitudes toward US–Mexico border security. Political Geography, 65, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.05.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hangartner, D., Dinas, E., Marbach, M., Matakos, K., & Xefteris, D. (2019). Does exposure to the refugee crisis make natives more hostile? American Political Science Review, 113(2), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harell, A., Soroka, S., & Iyengar, S. (2017). Locus of control and anti‐immigrant sentiment in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Political Psychology, 38(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, T. K., Newman, B. J., & Scott Bell, C. (2014). Decoding prejudice toward Hispanics: Group cues and public reactions to threatening immigrant behavior. Political Behavior, 36(1), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9231-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatungimana, W. (2023). Expectation and disconfirmation: Dissatisfaction influence on attitude toward immigrants in South Africa. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2023.2248295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellwig, T., & Sinno, A. (2017). Different groups, different threats: Public attitudes toward immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1202749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, M. J. (2022). National identity and immigration: Threat from undocumented immigrants in the United States. In Moghaddam, F. M. & Hendricks, M. J. (Eds.), Contemporary immigration: Psychological perspectives to address challenges and inform solutions. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Hood, M. V. III, & Morris, I. L. (1998). Give us your tired, your poor, … but make sure they have a green card: The effects of documented and undocumented migrant context on Anglo opinion toward immigration. Political Behavior, 20(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024839032001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, D. J. (2010). Politicized places: Explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. American Political Science Review, 104, 40–60. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S000305540999036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights First. (2023). Extremism fact sheet: Xenophobia and anti-immigrant extremism: From fringe to mainstream. Human Rights First. https://humanrightsfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/FINAL-Xenaphobia-2023.pdfGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch. (2023, June 16). Qatar: Six months post-World Cup, migrant workers suffer: FIFA/Qatari authorities paid no compensation, silent on wage theft. Human Rights Watch. www.hrw.org/news/2023/06/16/qatar-six-months-post-world-cup-migrant-workers-sufferGoogle Scholar
Hummel, D. (2016). Immigrant-friendly and unfriendly cities: Impacts on the presence of a foreign-born population and city crime. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 17(4), 1211–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-015-0464-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immigration History. (n.d.). Muslim travel ban. Immigration History. https://immigrationhistory.org/item/muslim-travel-ban/Google Scholar
James, H. (2017). Deglobalization as a global challenge (135; CIGI Papers, pp. 1–11). Centre for International Governance Innovation.Google Scholar
Jones-Correa, M. (2011). All immigration is local: Receiving communities and their role in successful immigrant integration [Reports]. Center for American Progress. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1820700383?accountid=11091Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawasaki, R. K., & Ikeda, Y. (2020). Network analysis of attitudes toward immigrants in Asia. Applied Network Science, 5(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-020-00315-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khawaja, I., Christensen, T. W., & Lerche Mørck, L. (2023). Dehumanization and a psychology of deglobalization: Double binds and movements beyond radicalization and racialized mis-interpellation. Theory & Psychology, 33(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221138541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kil, H., Noels, K. A., Vargas Lascano, D. I., & Schweickart, O. (2019). English Canadians’ cultural stereotypes of ethnic minority groups: Implications of stereotype content for acculturation ideologies and immigration attitudes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 70, 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnvall, C., & Kisić Merino, P. (2023). Deglobalization and the political psychology of white supremacy. Theory & Psychology, 33(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221138535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krings, F., & Olivares, J. (2007). At the doorstep to employment: Discrimination against immigrants as a function of applicant ethnicity, job type, and raters’ prejudice. International Journal of Psychology, 42(6), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590701251721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunst, J. R., Dovidio, J. F., & Dotsch, R. (2018). White lookalikes: Mainstream culture adoption makes immigrants “look” phenotypically White. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(2), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217739279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levinson-King, R. (2022, November 22). Canada: Why the country wants to bring in 1.5m immigrants by 2025. BBC News. www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63643912Google Scholar
López-Rodríguez, L., Navas, M., Cuadrado, I., Coutant, D., & Worchel, S. (2014). The majority’s perceptions about adaptation to the host society of different immigrant groups: The distinct role of warmth and threat. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 40, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, L. M., & Ortega, D. M. (2019). Dreams deterred: The collateral consequences of localized immigration policies on undocumented Latinos in Colorado. Law & Policy, 41(1), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashuri, A., Burhan, O. K., & Van Leeuwen, E. (2013). The impact of multiculturalism on immigrant helping. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(3), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merle, R. (2018, September 10). A guide to the financial crisis—10 years later. The Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/a-guide-to-the-financial-crisis--10-years-later/2018/09/10/114b76ba-af10-11e8-a20b-5f4f84429666_story.htmlGoogle Scholar
Migration Information Source. (2019). Top migration issues of 2019. Migration Policy Institute. www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/migration-information-source/top-10-migration-issues-2019Google Scholar
Mlambo, D. N. (2021). South Africa and the challenge of xenophobia post-democratisation: A united Africa deterred. African Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 10(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3665/2021/v10n1a2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2008). Multiculturalism and intergroup relations: Psychological implications for democracy in global context. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2019). Threat to democracy: The appeal of authoritarianism in an age of uncertainty. American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M., & Perreault, S. (1992). Individual and collective mobility strategies among minority group members. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132(3), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1992.9924710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, K. E., & Marx, D. M. (2013). Attitudes toward unauthorized immigrants, authorized immigrants, and refugees. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19(3), 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030812CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neureiter, M. (2022). The effect of immigrant integration policies on public immigration attitudes: Evidence from a survey experiment in the United Kingdom. International Migration Review, 56(4), 1040–1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183211063499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngobeni, M. (2022). Narratives of xenophobia at a South African university. Communication, 48(3), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2022.2143835Google Scholar
O’Neil, K., & Tienda, M. (2010). A tale of two counties: Natives’ opinions toward immigration in North Carolina. International Migration Review, 44(3), 728–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2010.00823.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ordway, D.-M. (2017, February 15). The consequences of bilingual employment policies. The Journalist’s Resource. https://journalistsresource.org/economics/bilingual-employment-policies-spanish-black-people/Google Scholar
Osbeck, L. M., Moghaddam, F. M., & Perreault, S. (1997). Similarity and attraction among majority and minority groups in a multicultural context. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(96)00016-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T. V. (2023). The specter of deglobalization. Current History, 122(840), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, P., & Mughan, A. (2006). What’s to fear from immigrants? Creating an assimilationist threat scale. Political Psychology, 27(4), 549–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecoraro, M., & Ruedin, D. (2020). Occupational exposure to foreigners and attitudes towards equal opportunities. Migration Studies, 8(3), 382–423. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnz006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedroza, J. M. (2019). Deportation discretion: Tiered influence, minority threat, and “secure communities” deportations. Policy Studies Journal, 47(3), 624–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peixoto, J. (2012). Back to the south: Social and political aspects of Latin American migration to southern Europe. International Migration, 50(6), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2009.00537.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pruitt, S. (2023, June 6). How the Columbian Exchange brought globalization—And disease. History.Com. www.history.com/news/columbian-exchange-impact-diseasesGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. E., & Pang, J. S. (2017). Anti‐immigrant prejudice in rising East Asia: A stereotype content and integrated threat analysis. Political Psychology, 38(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, J. (2022, December 8). Migrants face ‘unprecedented rise in violence’ in EU borders, report finds. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/law/2022/dec/08/migrants-face-unprecedented-rise-in-violence-in-eu-borders-report-findsGoogle Scholar
Salas-Schweikart, R., Hendricks, M. J., Boychuck, M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (2024). Similarity-attraction across ethnic, religious, and political groups: Does celebrating differences or similarities make a difference?. The Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 1–20.Google Scholar
S&P Global. (n.d.). The evolution of deglobalization. S&P Global. www.spglobal.com/en/enterprise/geopolitical-risk/evolution-of-deglobalization/Google Scholar
Sewell, A. A. (2017). The (un)intended consequences of bilingual employment policies: Ethnoraciality and labor market segmentation in Alameda County, CA. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 14(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X16000345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation: Their social psychology. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., Martinez, C. M., Schwarzwald, J., & Tur-Kaspa, M. (1998). Prejudice toward immigrants to Spain and Israel: An integrated threat theory analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(4), 559–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stupi, E. K., Chiricos, T., & Gertz, M. (2016). Perceived criminal threat from undocumented immigrants: Antecedents and consequences for policy preferences. Justice Quarterly, 33(2), 239–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2014.902093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tartakovsky, E., & Walsh, S. D. (2016). Testing a new theoretical model for attitudes toward immigrants: The case of social workers’ attitudes toward asylum seekers in Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115613860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., & Jardina, A. E. (2013). Immigration opposition among U.S. Whites: General ethnocentrism or media priming of attitudes about Latinos? Political Psychology, 34(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00928.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, B. R., & Riffe, D. (2013). Perceived threat, immigration policy support, and media coverage: Hostile media and presumed influence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(4), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, K., & Hudak, Z. (2023, July 7). Trump says he’d bring bag “travel ban” that’s “even bigger than before.” CBS News. www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-bring-back-travel-ban-muslim-countries/Google Scholar
Whitaker, B. E. (2020). Refugees, foreign nationals, and Wageni: Comparing African responses to Somali migration. African Studies Review, 63(1), 18–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, L. X., & Cheryan, S. (2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000080CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The HTML of this chapter complies with version 2.2 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range of users and attains the highest (AAA) level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive accessibility guidelines.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.

Visual Accessibility

Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×