Book contents
- Herodotus and the Greek Poetic Tradition
- Herodotus and the Greek Poetic Tradition
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Poetry in Herodotus, Herodotus on Poetry
- Chapter 2 The Prologue of the Histories and the Greek Poetic Tradition
- Part I Herodotus and Epic Poetry
- Part II Herodotus and Greek Lyric Poetry
- Part III Herodotus and Greek Tragic Poetry
- Chapter 14 Herodotus and Aeschylus’ Persae
- Chapter 15 Herodotus’ Use of Attic Tragedy in the Lydian Logos
- Chapter 16 Tragic Tropes in Other Herodotean Narratives
- Conclusion
- References
- Index Locorum
- Subject Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 November 2025
Book contents
- Herodotus and the Greek Poetic Tradition
- Herodotus and the Greek Poetic Tradition
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Poetry in Herodotus, Herodotus on Poetry
- Chapter 2 The Prologue of the Histories and the Greek Poetic Tradition
- Part I Herodotus and Epic Poetry
- Part II Herodotus and Greek Lyric Poetry
- Part III Herodotus and Greek Tragic Poetry
- Chapter 14 Herodotus and Aeschylus’ Persae
- Chapter 15 Herodotus’ Use of Attic Tragedy in the Lydian Logos
- Chapter 16 Tragic Tropes in Other Herodotean Narratives
- Conclusion
- References
- Index Locorum
- Subject Index
- References
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Herodotus and the Greek Poetic Tradition , pp. 696 - 737Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Aarne, A. and Thompson, S. 1961. The Types of the Folktale: A Classification and Bibliography, 2nd ed. Helsinki: Academia Scientarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Agócs, P. 2020. “Pindar’s Pythian 4: Interpreting History in Song,” in Constantakopoulou, and Fragoulaki, (eds.), 87–154.Google Scholar
Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R. (eds.). 2012. Reading the Victory Ode. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, W. (ed.). 2019. Greek Elegy and Iambus: A Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, A. W. (ed.). 1993. The Fragments of Mimnermus: Text and Commentary. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Allen, D. S. 2000. The World of Prometheus: The Politics of Punishing in Democratic Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aloni, A. 2001. “The Proem of Simonides’ Plataea Elegy and the Circumstances of Its Performance,” in Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.), 86–105.Google Scholar
Aly, W. 1921. Volksmärchen, Sage und Novelle bei Herodot und seinen Zeitgenossen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht (repr. 1969, with corrections and appendix by L. Huber).Google Scholar
Anhalt, E. K. 1993. Solon the Singer: Politics and Poetics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Asheri, D. 1988. “Carthaginians and Greeks,” in Boardman, , Hammond, , Lewis, , and Ostwald, (eds.), vol. iv, 739–80.Google Scholar
Asheri, D. 1993. “Erodoto e Bacide. Considerazioni sulla fede di Erodoto negli oracoli (Hdt. VIII 77),” in Sordi, (ed.) (1993), 63–76.Google Scholar
Asheri, D. 1998. “Platea vendetta delle Termopili: alle origini di un motivo teologico erodoteo,” in Sordi, (ed.) (1998), 65–86.Google Scholar
Asheri, D. (ed.). 2003. Erodoto Le Storie Libro VIII La vittoria de Temistocle. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Asheri, D. (ed.). 2006. Erodoto: Erodoto Le Storie Libro IX La battaglia di Platea. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Asheri, D. 2007a. “General Introduction,” in Asheri, D., Lloyd, A., and Corcella, A. (eds.), 1–56.Google Scholar
Asheri, D. 2007b. “Book I,” in Asheri, D., Lloyd, A., and Corcella, A. (eds.), 57–218.Google Scholar
Asheri, D. 2007c. “Book III,” in Asheri, D., Lloyd, A., and Corcella, A. (eds.), 379–542.Google Scholar
Asheri, D., Lloyd, A., and Corcella, A.. 2007. A Commentary on Herodotus Books I–IV, ed. by Murray, O. and Moreno, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2003. “Transformations of Colonial Disruption into Narrative Continuity in Pindar’s Epinician Odes,” HSCPh 101: 93–128.Google Scholar
Baines, J., van der Blom, H., Chen, Y. S., and Rood, T. (eds.). 2019. Historical Consciousness and the Use of the Past in the Ancient World. Sheffield: Equinox.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E. 2002. “The Making of History: Herodotus’ Historiēs Apodexis,” in Bakker, et al. (eds.), 3–32.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. (ed.). 2010. A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.). 2002. Brill’s Companion to Herodotus. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bal, M. 1997. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative, 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. 2008. Motivation and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baragwanath, E. 2012a. “Returning to Troy: Herodotus and the Mythic Discourse of His Own Time,” in Baragwanath, and de Bakker, (eds.), 287–312.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. 2012b. “The Mythic Plupast in Herodotus,” in Grethlein, and Krebs, (eds.), 35–56.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. 2019. “Myth and History Entwined: Female Influence and Male Usurpation in Herodotus’ Histories,” in Baines, , van der Blom, , and Rood, (eds.), 293–311.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. 2020. “History, Ethnography, and Aetiology in Herodotus’ Libyan Logos,” in Constantakopoulou, and Fragoulaki, (eds.), 155–88.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. 2023. “Aeschylus and History,” in Burian, and Bromberg, (eds.), 346–60.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M.. 2012a. “Introduction: Myth, Truth, and Narrative in Herodotus’ Histories,” in Baragwanath, and de Bakker, (eds.), 1–56.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (eds.). 2012b. Myth, Truth, and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, E. T. E. 2009. Entering the Agōn: Dissent and Authority in Homer, Historiography and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, E. T. E. 2022. “Die Another Day: Sarpedon, Aristodemos, and Homeric Intertextuality in Herodotus,” in Matijašić, (ed.), 161–210.Google Scholar
Baron, C. (ed.). 2021. The Herodotus Encyclopedia, 3 vols. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, J. P. and Easterling, P.. 1985. “Early Greek Elegy: Callinus, Tyrtaeus, Mimnermus,” in Easterling, and Knox, (eds.), vol. i, 128–36.Google Scholar
Baum, A. D. 2003. “Zu Funktion und Authentizitätsanspruch der oratio recta. Hebräische und griechische Geschichtsschreibung im Vergleich,” Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 115: 586–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beazley, J. D. 1963. Attic Red-Figure Vase-Painters, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belfiore, E. 2000. Murder Among Friends: Violation of Philia in Greek Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bers, V. 1984. Greek Poetic Syntax in the Classical Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelli, L. 2001. “Hecataeus: From Genealogy to Historiography,” in Luraghi, (ed.), 67–94.Google Scholar
Blaise, F. 2006. “Poetics and Politics: Tradition Re-Worked in Solon’s ‘Eunomia’ (Poem 4),” in Blok, and Lardinois, (eds.), 114–33.Google Scholar
Blok, J. H. and Lardinois, A. P. M. H. (eds.). 2006. Solon of Athens: New Historical and Philological Approaches. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blösel, W. 2001. “The Herodotean Picture of Themistocles: A Mirror of Fifth-Century Athens,” in Luraghi, (ed.), 179–97.Google Scholar
Blösel, W. 2004. Themistokles bei Herodot: Spiegel Athens im fünften Jahrhundert. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. (ed.). 1987. “Herodotus and the Invention of History,” Special Edition of Arethusa 20.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 1993. “Hero Cult and Politics in Herodotus,” in Dougherty, and Kurke, (eds.), 164–77.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 1995. “Simonides on Plataea: Narrative Elegy, Mythodic History,” ZPE 107: 217–29.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 1996. “Heroic Historiography: Simonides and Herodotus on Plataea,” in Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.), “The New Simonides,” Special Edition of Arethusa 29.2: 223–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boedeker, D. 1998. “Presenting the Past in Fifth-Century Athens,” in Boedeker, and Raaflaub, (eds.), 185–202.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 2001a. “Heroic Historiography: Simonides and Herodotus on Plataea,” in Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.), 120–34.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 2001b. “Paths to Heroization at Plataea,” in Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.), 148–63.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 2002. “Epic Heritage and Mythical Patterns in Herodotus,” in Bakker, , de Jong, , and van Wees, (eds.), 97–116.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 2003. “Pedestrian Fatalities: The Prosaics of Death in Herodotus,” in Derow, and Parker, (eds.), 17–36.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 2007. “The View from Eleusis: Demeter in the Persian Wars,” in Bridges, , Hall, , and Rhodes, (eds.), 65–82.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 2011. “Early Greek Poetry as/and History,” in Feldherr, and Hardy, (eds.), vol. i, 122–47.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 2012. “Speaker’s Past and Plupast: Herodotus in the Light of Elegy and Lyric,” in Grethlein, and Krebs, (eds.), 17–34.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 2022. “Through Barbarian Eyes: Non-Greeks on Greeks in Herodotus,” in Kingsley, , Monti, , and Rood, (eds.), 157–76.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. and Raaflaub, K. (eds.). 1998. Democracy, Empire, and the Arts in Fifth-Century Athens. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. and Sider, D.. 2001a. “Introduction,” in Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.) (2001b), 3–6.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.). 2001b. The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, A. M. 2012. “Mythology and the Expedition of Xerxes,” in Baragwanath, and de Bakker, (2012b), 269–86.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1986. “Early Greek Elegy, Symposium and Public Festival,” JHS 106: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1993. “Lies, Fiction and Slander in Early Greek Poetry,” in Gill, and Wiseman, (eds.), 1–37.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2001a. “Ancestors of Historiography in Early Greek Elegiac and Iambic Poetry?” in Luraghi, (ed.), 45–66.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2001b. “Early Greek Iambic Poetry: The Importance of Narrative,” in Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A., and Barchiesi, A. (eds.), Iambic Ideas: Essays on a Poetic Tradition from Archaic Greece to the Late Roman Empire. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1–27.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2009. “Wandering Poets, Archaic Style,” in Hunter, R. and Rutherford, I. (eds.), Wandering Poets in Ancient Greek Culture: Travel, Locality and Pan-Hellenism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 105–36.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2010. “Historical Narrative in Early Classical Greek Elegy,” in Konstan, D. and Raaflaub, K. (eds.), Epic and History. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 145–66.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2014. “Rediscovering Sacadas,” in Moreno, A. and Thomas, R. (eds.), Patterns of the Past: Epitedeumata in the Greek Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2016. “Cultic Contexts for Elegiac Performance,” in Swift, L. and Carey, C. (eds.), Greek Iambus and Elegy: New Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15–32.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (ed.). 2018b. Herodotus: Narrator, Scientist, Historian. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowra, C. M. 1930. Tradition and Design in the Iliad. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Branscome, D. 2013. Textual Rivals: Self-Presentation in Herodotus’ Histories. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branscome, D. 2015. “Waiting for Solon: Audience Expectations in Herodotus,” Histos 9: 231–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braswell, B. K. 1988. A Commentary on the Fourth Pythian Ode of Pindar. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M. 1969. Hamartia: Tragic Error in the Poetics of Aristotle and in Greek Tragedy. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M. 1990. “Pindar’s Paradoxical ἐγώ and a Recent Controversy about the Performance of His Epinikia,” in Slings, S. R. (ed.), The Poet’s I in Archaic Greek Lyric. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Press, 41–58.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 1983. The Early Greek Concept of the Soul. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2006. “The Rise of the Hero Cult and the New Simonides,” ZPE 158: 15–26.Google Scholar
Briant, P. 2002. From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire, trans. P. Daniels. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Bridges, E. 2015. Imagining Xerxes: Ancient Perspectives on a Persian King. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bridges, E., Hall, E., and Rhodes, P. J. (eds.). 2007. Cultural Responses to the Persian Wars, Antiquity to the Third Millennium. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadhead, H. D. (ed.). 1960. The Persae of Aeschylus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brosius, M. 2021. A History of Ancient Persia: The Achaemenid Empire. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. (ed.). 2009. The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budelmann, F. (ed.). 2018. Greek Lyric: A Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. S. 2001. The Tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the Epic Cycle. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. S. 2005. “The Epic Cycle and Fragments,” in Foley, J. M. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Epic. Oxford: Blackwell, 344–52.Google Scholar
Burian, P. 1986. “Zeus ΣΩΤΗΡ ΤΡΙΤΟΣ and Some Triads in Aeschylus’ Oresteia,” AJP 107: 332–42.Google Scholar
Burian, P. and Bromberg, J. (eds.). 2023. A Companion to Aeschylus. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, trans. Minar, E. L. Jr. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1976. “Das Hunderttorige Theben und die Datierung der Ilias,” WS 10: 5–21.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1983. Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth, trans. Bing, P.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1985. “Das Ende des Kroisos: Vorstufen einer Herodoteischen Geschichtserzählung,” in Schäublin, C. (ed.), Catalepton: Festschrift für B. Wyss zum 80. Geburtstag. Basel: Seminar für Klassische Philologie der Universität, 4–15.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. P. 1983. Three Archaic Poets: Archilochus, Alcaeus, Sappho. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. P. 2005. Pindar’s Songs for Young Athletes of Aegina. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, R. G. A. (ed.). 1999. From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calame, C. 2003. Myth and History in Ancient Greece: The Symbolic Creation of a Colony, trans. Berman, D. W.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2004. “Succession des ages et pragmatique poétique de la justice: Le récit hésiodique des cinq espéces humaines,” Kernos 17: 67–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calame, C. 2011. Mythe et histoire dans L’Antiquité grecque: La création symbolique d’une colonie, 2nd ed. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2014. “Narrative Semantics and Pragmatics: The Poetic Creation of Cyrene,” in Edmunds, L. (ed.), Approaches to Greek Myth, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 281–352.Google Scholar
Canfora, L. 2011. “The Historical ‘Cycle’,” in Marincola, J. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Greek and Roman Historiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 365–88.Google Scholar
Carey, C. 2016. “Homer and Epic in Herodotus’ Book 7,” in Efstathiou, A. and Karamanou, I. (eds.), Homeric Receptions across Generic and Cultural Contexts: Trends in Classics, Supplementary Volume 37. Berlin: Brill, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, D. 1987. Review of R. Koselleck, Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, H&T 26: 197–204.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. 1996. “La nascita degli opliti e l’organizzazione militare,” in Settis, S. (ed.), I Greci: Storia, arte, cultura, e società. Noi e i Greci, Vol. II.i. Turin: Einaudi, 681–714.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. and Greenwood, E.. 2002. “Herodotus as Critic: Truth, Fiction, Polarity,” in Bakker, et al. (eds.), 351–71.Google Scholar
Castriota, D. 1992. Myth, Ethos, and Actuality: Official Art in Fifth-Century B.C. Athens. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Cataudella, Q. 1966. “La ricostruzione delle tragedie greche perdute,” Cultura e Scuola 17: 30–40.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, P. 1993. “La fable des poissons de Cyrus (Hérodote, I, 141): Son origine et sa fonction dans l’économie des Histoires d’Hérodote,” Metis 8: 29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. 2001. “‘We the Others’: Interpretive Community and Plural Voice in Herodotus,” ClAnt 20: 5–34.Google Scholar
Chiasson, C. C. 1982. “Tragic Diction in Herodotus: Some Possibilities,” Phoenix 36: 156–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiasson, C. C. 2001. “Scythian Androgyny and Environmental Determinism in Herodotus and the Hippocratic περὶ ἀέρων ὑδάτων τόπων,” SyllClass 12: 33–73.Google Scholar
Chiasson, C. C. 2003. “Herodotus’ Use of Attic Tragedy in the Lydian Logos,” ClAnt 22: 5–35.Google Scholar
Chiasson, C. C. 2005. “Myth, Ritual, and Authorial Control in Herodotus’ Story of Cleobis and Biton (Hist. 1.31),” AJP 126: 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiasson, C. C. 2012a. “Herodotus’ Prologue and the Greek Poetic Tradition,” Histos 6: 114–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiasson, C. C. 2012b. “Myth and Truth in Herodotus’ Cyrus Logos,” in Baragwanath, and de Bakker, (eds.), 213–32.Google Scholar
Chiasson, C. C. 2016. “Solon’s Poetry and Herodotean Historiography,” AJP 137: 25–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiasson, C. C. 2024. “The Greek Embassy to Gelon (Hdt. 7.153–67) and Iliad 9,” Syllogos 3: 42–59.Google Scholar
Clark, E. 2004. History, Theory, Text: Historians and the Linguistic Turn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. 2018. Shaping the Geography of Empire: Man and Nature in Herodotus’ Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, D. 2004. Archilochos Heros: The Cult of Poets in the Greek Polis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. 2005. “The Beginning and End of the Catalogue of Women and its Relation to Hesiod,” in Hunter, (ed.), 25–34.Google Scholar
Cobet, J. 2002. “The Organization of Time in the Histories,” in Bakker, et al. (eds.), 387–412.Google Scholar
Conacher, D. 1996. “Persae,” in Aeschylus: The Earlier Plays and Related Studies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, W. R. 1993. “The Histor in History,” in Rosen, R. and Farrell, J. (eds.), Nomodeiktes: Greek Studies in Honor of Martin Ostwald. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 3–15.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. L. III. 1974. “Intrusive Oblique Infinitives in Herodotus,” TAPA 104: 23–76.Google Scholar
Constantakopoulou, C. and Fragoulaki, M. (eds.). 2020. Shaping Memory in Ancient Greece: Poetry, Historiography, and Epigraphy, Histos Supplement 11. Newcastle upon Tyne: Histos.Google Scholar
Corcella, A. 2006. “The New Genre and Its Boundaries: Poets and Logographers,” in Rengakos, A. and Tsakmakis, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Thucydides. Leiden: Brill, 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, E. M. (ed.). 1990. Owls to Athens: Essays on Classical Culture Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, G. 1996a. The Blinded Eye: Thucydides and the New Written Word. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Crane, G. 1996b. “The Prosperity of Tyrants: Bacchylides, Herodotus, and the Contest for Legitimacy,” Arethusa 29: 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, S. 2002. “Language, Literary Studies, and Historical Thought,” in Kramer, L. and Maza, S. (eds.), A Companion to Western Historical Thought. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 319–36.Google Scholar
Crielaard, J. P. 1995. “Homer, History and Archaeology: Some Remarks on the Date of the Homeric World,” in Crielaard, J. P. (ed.), Homeric Questions. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben, 201–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crielaard, J. P. 2002. “Past or Present? Epic Poetry, Aristocratic Self-Representation and the Concept of Time in the Eighth and Seventh Centuries BC,” in Montanari, F. and Ascheri, P. (eds.), Omero tremila anni dopo. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 239–95.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. and Miller, M.. 1998. “Democracy, Empire, and Art: Toward a Politics of Time and Narrative,” in Boedeker, and Raaflaub, (eds.), 87–125.Google Scholar
Currie, B. 2005. Pindar and the Cult of Heroes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, B. 2021a. “The Birth of Literary Criticism (Herodotus 2.116–17) and the Roots of Homeric Neoanalysis,” in Price, J. J. and Zelnick-Abramovitz, R. (eds.), Text and Intertext in Greek Epic and Drama: Essays in Honor of Margalit Finkelberg. London: Routledge, 147–70.Google Scholar
Darbo-Peschanski, C. 1987. Le discours du particulier: Essai sur l’enquete Hérodotéenne. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Darbo-Peschanski, C. 2017. “Multiple Ways to Access the Past: The Myth of Oedipus, Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex and Herodotus’ Histories,” in Ruffell, I. and Hau, L. I. (eds.), Truth and History in the Ancient World: Pluralising the Past. New York: Routledge, 81–103.Google Scholar
Davies, M. 2010. “From Rags to Riches: Democedes of Croton and the Credibility of Herodotus,” BICS 53: 19–44.Google Scholar
Davies, M. and Finglass, P. J. (eds.). 2014. Stesichorus: The Poems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Bakker, M. P. 2007. “Speech and Authority in Herodotus’ Histories.” Diss., University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
de Bakker, M. P. 2012. “Herodotus’ Proteus: Myth, History, Enquiry, and Storytelling,” in Baragwanath, and de Bakker, (eds.), 107–26.Google Scholar
Deffner, A. 1933. Die Rede bei Herodot und ihre Weiterbildung bei Thukydides. Munich: Salesian.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 1987. Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad. Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 1999. “Aspects narratologiques des Histoires d’Hérodote,” Lalies 19: 217–75.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 2001a. A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 2001b. “The Anachronical Structure of Herodotus’ Histories,” in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Texts, Ideas, and the Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 2004a. “Herodotus,” in de Jong, , Nünlist, , and Bowie, (eds.) (2004), 101–14.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 2004b. “Homer,” in de Jong, , Nünlist, , and Bowie, (eds.) (2004), 13–24.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 2004c. “Narratological Theory on Narrators, Narratees, and Narrative,” in de Jong, , Nünlist, , and Bowie, (eds.), 1–10.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 2005. “Narratologia e storiographia: il racconto di Atys e Adrasto in Erodoto 1.34–45,” QUCC 80: 87–96.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 2006. “Herodotus on the Dream of Cambyses (Histories 3.30, 61–5),” in Lardinois, A., van der Poel, M. G. M., and Hunink, V. J. C. (eds.), Land of Dreams: Greek and Latin Studies in Honour of A. H. M. Kessels. Leiden: Brill, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 2007b. “Introduction: Narratological Theory on Time,” in de Jong, and Nünlist, (eds.), 1–14.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. (ed.). 2012a. Homer Iliad Book XXII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 2012b. “The Helen Logos and Herodotus’ Fingerprint,” in Baragwanath, and de Bakker, (eds.), 127–42.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 2013. “Narratological Aspects of the Histories,” in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Classical Studies Herodotus: Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 253–91; trans. and rev. from de Jong (1999).Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 2014. Narratology & Classics: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. and Nünlist, R. (eds.). 2007. Time in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Vol. ii. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F., Nünlist, R., and Bowie, A. (eds.). 2004. Narrators, Narratees, and Narrative in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Vol. i. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Demont, P. 2009. “Figures of Inquiry in Herodotus’ Inquiries,” Mnemosyne 62: 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demont, P. 2013. “Le Nomos-Roi: Hérodote, III, 38,” in Alaux, J. (ed.), Hérodote: forms de pensée, figures du récit. Histoire. Série Histoire ancienne. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.). 2000. Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
De Romilly, J. 1985. A Short History of Greek Literature, trans. Doherty, L.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derow, P. 1994. “Historical Explanation: Polybius and His Predecessors,” in Hornblower, (ed.), 73–90.Google Scholar
Derow, P. and Parker, R. (eds.). 2003. Herodotus and His World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmond, W. 2004. “Punishments and the Conclusion of Herodotus’ Histories,” GRBS 44: 19–40.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1996. The Masters of Truth in Archaic Greece, trans. Lloyd, J.. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. and Vernant, J. P. 1991. Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society, trans. J. Lloyd. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 1981. “Women and Culture in Herodotus’ Histories,” in Foley, H. P. (ed.), Reflections of Women in Antiquity. New York: Routledge, 91–125.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 1985. “Practical Knowledge and the Historian’s Role in Herodotus and Thucydides,” in Jameson, M. (ed.), The Greek Historians: Literature and History. Papers Presented to A. E. Raubitschek. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri, 47–63.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 1987. “Narrative Surface and Authorial Voice in Herodotus’ Histories,” in Boedeker, (ed.), 147–70.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 1997. “Wanton Kings, Pickled Heroes, and Gnomic Founding Fathers: Strategies of Meaning at the End of Herodotus’s Histories,” in Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 62–82.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 1998. “Introduction and Notes,” in Herodotus: The Histories, trans. Waterfield, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 2002. “‘I Didn’t Give My Own Genealogy’: Herodotus and the Authorial Persona,” in Bakker et al. (eds.), 267–89.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 2012. “Myth and Legend in Herodotus’ First Book,” in Baragwanath, and de Bakker, (eds.), 59–85.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.). 2006. The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewald, C. and Munson, R. V. (eds.) 2022. Herodotus Histories Book I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dickie, E. 1996. Greek Forms of Address from Herodotus to Lucian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diller, H. 1962. “Die Hellenen-Barbaren-Antithese im Zeitalter der Perserkriege,” in Grecs et Barbares. Geneva: Fondation Hardt Entretiens 8, 39–68.Google Scholar
Dillery, J. 1996. “Reconfiguring the Past: Thyrea, Thermopylae, and Narrative Patterns in Herodotus,” AJP 117: 217–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillery, J. 2018. “Making Logoi: Herodotus’ Book 2 and Hecataeus of Miletus,” in Harrison, and Irwin, (eds.), 17–52.Google Scholar
Donelli, G. 2016. “Herodotus and Greek Lyric Poetry,” in Liotsakis, V. and Farrington, S. (eds.), The Art of History: Literary Perspectives on Greek and Roman Historiography. Berlin: de Gruyter, 11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donelli, G. 2022. “Truth, Fiction, and Authority in Herodotus’ Book 8,” in Matijašić, (ed.), 211–40.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. 1993. The Poetics of Colonization: From City to Text in Archaic Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, C. 1994. “Archaic Greek Foundation Poetry: Questions of Genre and Occasion,” JHS 114: 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, C. and Kurke, L. (eds.). 1998. Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1997. The Evolution of Greek Prose Style. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowden, K. 2019. “Aristeas (35),” in Jacoby Online: Brill’s New Jacoby, 2nd ed., Part I, ed. Worthington, Ian. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. (ed.) 1997b. The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterling, P. and Knox, B. M. W. (eds.). 1982. The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Vol. i. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. 1987. Homer: Poet of the Iliad. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egermann, H. 1957. “Arete und tragische Bewusstheit bei Sophokles und Herodot,” in Hörmann, F. (ed.), Vom Menschen in der Antike. Munich: Bayer, 5–128.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. 2023. “Relativism in Herodotus: Foreign Crimes and Divinities,” in Schwab, A. and Schütze, A. (eds.), Herodotean Soundings: The Cambyses Logos. Tubingen: Narr Francke Attempto, 109–49.Google Scholar
Erbse, H. 1979. “Über Herodots Kroisoslogos,” in Ausgewählte Schriften zur klassischen Philologie. Berlin: de Gruyter, 180–202.Google Scholar
Erbse, H. 1991. “Fiktion und Wahrheit im Werke Herodots,” Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen 4: 131–50.Google Scholar
Evans, J. A. S. 1991. Herodotus, Explorer of the Past. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Falkner, T. M. 1995. The Poetics of Old Age in Greek Epic, Lyric, and Tragedy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. 2007a. Bacchylides: Politics, Performance, Poetic Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearn, D. 2007b. “Narrating Ambiguity: Murder and Macedonian Allegiance (5.17–22),” in Irwin, and Greenwood, (eds.), 98–127.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. 2012. “Bacchylidean Myths,” in Agócs, , Carey, , and Rawles, (eds.), Reading the Victory Ode. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 321–43.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 2007. Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehling, D. 1989. Herodotus and His “Sources”: Citation, Invention and Narrative Art, trans. Howie, J. G.. Leeds: Cairns.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. and Hardy, G. (eds.). 2011. The Oxford History of Historical Writing, Vol. i. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finglass, P. J. (ed.). 2007. Sophocles Electra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finglass, P. J. 2018a. “Sophocles’ Oedipus and Herodotus’ Periander,” in Bowie, (ed.), 59–75.Google Scholar
Finglass, P. J. (ed.) 2018b. Sophocles: Oedipus the King. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelberg, M. 1995. “Sophocles Tr. 634–39 and Herodotus,” Mnemosyne 48: 146–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelberg, M. 1998. The Birth of Literary Fiction in Ancient Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finley, M. I. 1975. “Myth, Memory, and History,” in The Use and Abuse of History, revised ed. New York: Penguin, 11–33.Google Scholar
Fisher, N. R. E. 1992. Hybris: A Study in the Values of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greece. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Fisher, N. R. E. 2002. “Popular Morality in Herodotus,” in Bakker et al. (eds.), 199–224.Google Scholar
Flory, S. 1987. The Archaic Smile of Herodotus. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Flower, H. 1991. “Herodotus and Delphic Traditions about Croesus,” in Flower, M. and Toher, M. (eds.), Georgica: Greek Studies in Honour of George Cawkwell, BICS Supplement 58: 57–77.Google Scholar
Flower, M. A. 1998. “Simonides, Ephorus, and Herodotus on the Battle of Thermopylae,” CQ 48: 365–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, M. A. and Marincola, J. (eds.). 2002. Herodotus Histories Book IX. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, J. M. 1991. Immanent Art: From Structure to Meaning in Traditional Oral Epic. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, A. 2002. The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. 2007. “Herodotus and the Poets,” in Strassler, R. B. (ed.), The Landmark Herodotus: The Histories. New York: Pantheon, 816–18.Google Scholar
Fornara, C. W. 1971. Herodotus: An Interpretative Essay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fornara, C. W. 1983. The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsdyke, S. 2001. “Athenian Democratic Ideology and Herodotus’ Histories,” AJP 122: 329–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förstemann, A. G. 1892. De vocabulis quae videntur esse apud Herodotum poeticis. Parthenopoli: Faber.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L. 1987. The Nature of Early Greek Lyric: Three Preliminary Studies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R. L. 2000. Early Greek Mythography, Vol. 1: Text and Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L. 2004. “The Homeric Question,” in Fowler, R. L. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 220–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R. L. 2006. “Herodotus and His Prose Predecessors,” in Dewald, and Marincola, (eds.), 29–45.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L. 2009. “Thoughts on Myth and Religion in Early Greek Historiography,” Minerva 22: 21–39.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L. 2010. “Gods in Early Greek Historiography,” in Bremmer, J. N. and Erskine, A. (eds.), The Gods of Ancient Greece: Identities and Transformations, Edinburgh Leventis Studies 5. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 318–34.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L. 2013. Early Greek Mythography, Vol. 2: Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R. L. 2017. “Imaginary Itineraries in the Beyond,” in Hawes, G. (ed.), Myths on the Map: The Storied Landscapes of Ancient Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 243–60.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (ed.). 1950. Aeschylus Agamemnon, 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fragoulaki, M. 2020. “Thucydides Homericus and the Episode of Mycalessus (7.29–30): Myth and History, Space and Collective Memory,” in Constantakopoulou, and Fragoulaki, (eds.), 37–86.Google Scholar
Fragoulaki, M. 2022. “Bloody Death in Greek Historiography and Homer: Discursive Presences and Meaningful Absences in Herodotus’ Battle Narratives,” in Matijašić, (ed.), 107–60.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1955. “Eine Stileigenheit der frühgriechischen Literatur,” in Wege und Formen frühgriechischen Denkens. Munich: Beck, 40–96.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1975. Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Fraser, P. M. et al. (eds.). (1987–) A Lexicon of Greek Personal Names. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, W. H. 1973. “Der Tod des Tyrannen: Die poetische Gerechtigkeit der alten Geschichtsschreiber – und Herodotus,” A&A 18: 97–129.Google Scholar
Gagné, R. 2021. Cosmography and the Idea of Hyperborea in Ancient Greece: A Philology of Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gantz, T. 1980. “The Aischylean Tetralogy: Attested and Conjectured Groups,” AJP 101: 133–64.Google Scholar
Garvie, A. F. (ed.). 1994. Homer Odyssey Books VI–VIII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gehrke, H.-J. 2001. “Myth, History, and Collective Identity: Uses of the Past in Ancient Greece and Beyond,” in Luraghi, (ed.), 286–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genette, G. 1980. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method, trans. Lewin, J. E.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1989. Narrative Discourse Revisited, trans. J. E. Lewin. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Georges, P. 1994. Barbarian Asia and the Greek Experience. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. E. 1982. Pindar’s Olympian One: A Commentary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, D. E. (ed.). 1997a. A Companion to the Greek Lyric Poets. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, D. E. (ed.). 1999. Greek Elegiac Poetry: From the Seventh to the Fifth Centuries BC. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Geus, K., Irwin, E., and Poiss, T. (eds.). 2013. Herodots Wege des Erzählens: Logos und Topos in den Historien. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giangiulio, M. 2001. “Constructing the Past: Colonial Traditions and the Writing of History. The Case of Cyrene,” in Luraghi, (ed.), 116–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gildersleeve, B. L. 1890. Pindar: The Olympian and Pythian Odes. New York: American Book Company.Google Scholar
Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.). 1993. Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1988. “Battle Narrative and Politics in Aeschylus’ Persae,” JHS 108: 189–93.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1991. The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2002. The Invention of Prose: Greece & Rome. New Surveys in the Classics No. 32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
González, J. M. 2010. “The Catalogue of Women and the End of the Heroic Age (Hesiod fr. 201–94–103 M-W),” TAPA 140: 375–422.Google Scholar
Gordesiani, R. 1986. Kriterien der Schriftlichkeit und Mündlichkeit im homerischen Epos. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Graf, F. 1993. Greek Mythology: An Introduction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, A. J. 1960. “The Authenticity of the ΟΡΚΙΟΝ ΤΩΝ ΟΙΚΙΣΤΗΡΩΝ of Cyrene,” JHS 80: 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, A. J. 1983. Colony and Mother City in Ancient Greece, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Ares.Google Scholar
Gray, V. 1996. “Herodotus and Images of Tyranny: The Tyrants of Corinth,” AJP 117: 361–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, V. 2001. “Herodotus’ Literary and Historical Method: Arion’s Story (1.23–24),” AJP 122: 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, V. 2002. “Short Stories in Herodotus’ Histories,” in Bakker et al. (eds.), 291–317.Google Scholar
Gray, V. 2003. “Herodotus in Two Minds,” in Davidson, J. and Pomeroy, A. (eds.), Theatres of Action: Papers for Chris Dearden. Auckland: Polygraphia, 43–62.Google Scholar
Greenwood, E. 2018. “Surveying Greatness and Magnitude in Herodotus,” in Harrison, and Irwin, (eds.), 163–86.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2006a. Das Geschichtsbild der Ilias. Eine Untersuchung aus phänomenologischer und narratologischer Perspektive. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2006b. “The Manifold Uses of the Epic Past: The Embassy Scene in Herodotus 7.153–63,” AJP 127: 485–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2007. “Diomedes Redivivus. A New Reading of Mimnermus fr 14 W2,” Mnemosyne 60: 102–11.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2009. “How Not to Do History: Xerxes in Herodotus’ Histories,” AJP 130: 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2010a. “From ‘Imperishable Glory’ to History: The Iliad and the Trojan War,” in Konstan, D. and Raaflaub, K. (eds.), Epic and History. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 122–44.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2010b. The Greeks and Their Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2018. “The Dynamics of Time: Herodotus’ Histories and Contemporary Athens Before and After Fornara,” in Harrison, and Irwin, (eds.), 223–42.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.). 2012. Time and Narrative in Ancient Historiography: The “Plupast” from Herodotus to Appian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. 1977. “The Epic Cycle and the Uniqueness of Homer,” JHS 97: 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, M. 1990. “Contest and Contradiction in Early Greek Poetry,” in Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. (eds.), The Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 185–207.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. 1998. “The King and Eye: The Rule of the Father in Greek Tragedy,” PCPS 44: 20–84.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. 2009. “Greek Lyric and the Place of Humans in the World,” in Budelmann, (ed.), 72–94.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. H. 1987. “Democedes of Croton: A Greek Doctor at Darius’ Court,” in Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. and Kuhrt, A. (eds.), Achaemenid History II: The Greek Sources. Leiden: Brill, 37–51.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. H. 1999. “Euenius the Negligent Nightwatchman (Herodotus 9.92–6),” in Buxton, (ed.), 169–82.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. H. 2001. “Behind the Lines: The Genesis of Stories in Herodotus,” in Budelmann, F. and Michelakis, P. (eds.), Homer, Tragedy and Beyond: Essays in Honour of P. E. Easterling. London: Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies, 75–89.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. H. 2006. “Stories and Storytelling in the Histories,” in Dewald, and Marincola, (eds.), 130–44.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 2011. Rethinking the Other in Antiquity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hainsworth, B. (ed.). 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary, III: Books 9–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, E. 1989. Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, E. 1993. “Asia Unmanned: Images of Victory in Classical Athens,” in Rich, J. and Shipley, G. (eds.), War and Society in the Greek World, Leicester-Nottingham Studies in Ancient Society, vol. 4. London: Routledge, 107–33.Google Scholar
Hall, E. 1994. “Drowning by Nomes: The Greeks, Swimming, and Timotheus’ Persians,” in Khan, H. (ed.), The Birth of the European Identity: The Europe-Asia Contrast in Greek Thought, Nottingham Classical Literature Studies, vol. 2. Nottingham: University of Nottingham Press, 44–80.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2011. Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hannah, R. 2005. Greek and Roman Calendars: Constructions of Time in the Classical World. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, W. 2002. Ariadne’s Thread: A Guide to International Stories in Classical Literature Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. 2000a. Divinity and History: The Religion of Herodotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. 2000b. The Emptiness of Asia: Aeschylus’ Persians and the History of the Fifth Century. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. 2004. “Truth and Lies in Herodotus’ Histories,” in Karageorghis, V. and Taifacos, I. (eds.), The World of Herodotus. Nicosia: A. G. Leventis Foundation, 255–63.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. 2022. “Herodotus, Homer, and the Character of the Gods,” in Matijašić, (ed.), 91–105.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. and Irwin, E. (eds.). 2018. Interpreting Herodotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartog, F. 1988. The Mirror of Herodotus, trans. Lloyd, J.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hartog, F. 1999. “‘Myth into Logos’: The Case of Croesus, or the Historian at Work,” in Buxton, (ed.), 183–96.Google Scholar
Hau, L. I. 2016. Moral History from Herodotus to Diodorus Siculus. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Haywood, J. 2022. “Homeric Allusions in Herodotus’ Histories,” in Matijašić, (ed.), 59–90.Google Scholar
Haywood, J. and Post, D.. 2022. “The Downfall of Croesus and Oedipus: Tracing Affinities between Herodotus’ Histories and Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus,” CW 115: 225–59.Google Scholar
Heiden, B. 2008a. “Common People and Leaders in Iliad Book 2: The Invocation of the Muses and the Catalogue of Ships,” TAPA 138: 127–54.Google Scholar
Heiden, B. 2008b. Homer’s Cosmic Fabrication: Choice and Design in the Iliad, American Philological Association, American Classical Studies 52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. (ed.). 1987. Aristophanes: Lysistrata. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herington, C. J. 1981. “Introduction,” in Aeschylus Persians, trans. Lembke, J. and Herington, C. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–29.Google Scholar
Herington, C. J. 1985. Poetry into Drama: Early Tragedy and the Greek Poetic Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Herman, G. 1987. Ritualised Friendship and the Greek City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Higbie, C. 2010. “Epigrams on the Persian Wars: Monuments, Memory and Politics,” in Baumbach, M., Petrovic, A., and Petrovic, I. (eds.), Archaic and Classical Greek Epigram. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183–201.Google Scholar
Hirschberger, M. (ed.). 2004. Gynaikon Katalogos und Megalai Ehoiai. Munich: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
Hohti, P. 1976. The Interrelation of Speech and Action in the Histories of Herodotus. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Holland, T. (trans.) 2013. Herodotus The Histories, with introduction and notes by Cartledge, P.. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 1998. “Images and Political Identity: The Case of Athens,” in Boedeker, and Raaflaub, (eds.), 153–83.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. 1991. A Commentary on Thucydides, Vol. I: Books I–III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. 1994b. “Narratology and Narrative Techniques in Thucydides,” in Hornblower, (1994c), 131–66.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (ed.). 1994c. Greek Historiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornblower, S. 2001. “Epic and Epiphanies: Herodotus and the ‘New Simonides’,” in Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.), 135–47.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. 2004. Thucydides and Pindar: Historical Narrative and the World of Epinician Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornblower, S. (ed.). 2013. Herodotus Histories Book V. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howie, J. G. 1983. “The Revision of Myth in Pindar Olympian 1: The Death and Revival of Pelops (25–27; 36–66),” Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 4: 277–313.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1985. The Pindaric Mind: A Study of Logical Structure in Early Greek Poetry. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1987. “The ‘Cooking’ of Pelops: Pindar and the Process of Mythological Revisionism,” Helios 14: 3–21.Google Scholar
Huber, L. 1965. “Herodots Homerverständnis,” in Flashar, H. and Gaiser, K. (eds.), Synusia: Festgabe für Wolfgang Schadewaldt. Pfullingen: Neske, 29–52.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (ed.). 2005. The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2001. Greek Lyric Poetry: A Commentary on Selected Larger Pieces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, H. 1966. Form and Thought in Herodotus, APA Monographs 23. Cleveland, OH: Western Reserve University Press.Google Scholar
Innes, D. (trans.). 1995. Demetrius On Style. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. 2005. Solon and Early Greek Poetry: The Politics of Exhortation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, E. 2006a. “The Biographies of Poets: The Case of Solon,” in McGing, B. and Mossman, J. (eds.), The Limits of Ancient Biography. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 13–30.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. 2006b. “The Transgressive Elegy of Solon?” in Blok, and Lardinois, (eds.), 36–78.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. 2007. “The Politics of Precedence: First ‘Historians’ on First ‘Thalassocrats,” in Osborne, R. (ed.), Debating the Athenian Cultural Revolution: Art, Literature, Philosophy, and Politics 430–380 BC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 188–223.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. 2013a. “‘The Hybris of Theseus’ and the Date of the Histories,” in Dunsch, B. and Ruffing, K. (eds.), Herodots Quellen—Die Quellen Herodots. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 7–84.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. 2013b. “The Significance of Talthybius’ Wrath (Hdt. 7.133–7),” in Geus et al. (eds.), 223–60.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. 2013c. “To Whom Does Solon Speak? Conceptions of Happiness and Ending Life Well in the Late Fifth Century: Contemporary Allusions in Herodotus’ Croesus Logos,” in Geus et al. (eds.), 261–322.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. 2018. “The End of the Histories and the End of the Atheno-Peloponnesian Wars,” in Harrison, and Irwin, (eds.), 279–334.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. and Greenwood, E. (eds.). 2007. Reading Herodotus: A Study of the Logoi in Book 5 of Herodotus’ Histories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isager, S. 1999. “The Pride of Halikarnassos: Editio Princeps of an Inscription from Salmakis,” ZPE 123: 1–23.Google Scholar
Isager, S. and Pedersen, P.. 2004. The Salmakis Inscription and Hellenistic Halikarnassos. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
Ivantchik, A. I. 1989. “The Date of the ‘Arimaspeia’ of Aristeas of Proconnesus,” VDI 2.29–49 (in Russian with English summary).Google Scholar
Ivantchik, A. I. 1993. “La datation du poeme l’Arimaspée d’Aristéas de Proconnese,” AC 62: 35–67.Google Scholar
Jebb, R. C. (ed.). 1905. Bacchylides: The Poems and Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. 2001. “Herodotus’ Storytelling Speeches: Socles (5.92) and Leotychides (6.86),” CJ 97: 1–26.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. 1994. “Oral Performance and the Composition of Herodotus’ Histories,” GRBS 35: 229–54.Google Scholar
Jones, P. V. 1997. “Introduction,” in Wright, G. M. and Jones, P. V. (eds.), Homer: German Scholarship in Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–46.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1981. “Les causes de la defaite des Barbares chez Eschyle, Herodote et Hippocrate,” Ktema 6: 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1984. “Rhétorique et medicine dans la Collection Hippocratique,” REG 97: 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1999. Hippocrates, trans. M. B. DeBevoise. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. 1979. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. 2003. The Verb “Be” in Ancient Greek. Indianapolis: Hackett. (Repr. of The Verb “Be” and Its Synonyms, Philosophical and Grammatical Studies 6. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973.)Google Scholar
Keitel, E. 1987. “Homeric Antecedents to the Cohortatio in the Ancient Historians,” CW 80: 153–72.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. 1989. “The Evolution of a Theory of Artistic Prose,” in Kennedy, G. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Vol. i. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 184–99.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. (trans.). 2005. Invention and Method: Two Rhetorical Treatises from the Hermogenic Corpus. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Keramopoullos, A. 1923. Ho apotumpanismos: Sumbole arkhaiologike eis ten historian tou poinikou dikaiou kai ten laographian. Athens: Typographion “Estia.”Google Scholar
Kierdorf, W. 1966. Erlebnis und Darstellung der Perserkriege: Studien zu Simonides, Pindar, Aischylos und den attischen Rednern. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, L. 2010. Homer Between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindt, J. 2006. “Delphic Oracle Stories and the Beginning of Historiography: Herodotus’ Croesus Logos,” CP 101: 34–51.Google Scholar
Kingsley, K. S. 2018. “Justifying Violence in Herodotus’ Histories 3.38: Nomos, King of All and Pindaric Poetics,” in Bowie (ed.), 37–58.Google Scholar
Kingsley, K. S. 2024. Herodotus and the Presocratics: Inquiry and Intellectual Culture in the Fifth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsley, K. S., Monti, G., and Rood, T. (eds.). 2022. The Authoritative Historian: Tradition and Innovation in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinzl, K. H. (ed.). 1977. Greece and the Eastern Mediterranean in Ancient History and Prehistory: Studies Presented to Fritz Schachermeyr on the Occasion of His Eightieth Birthday. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G. S. (ed.). 1985. The Iliad: A Commentary, I: Books 1–4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G. S. (ed.). 1990. The Iliad: A Commentary, II: Books 5–8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M. (eds.). 1983. The Pre-Socratic Philosophers, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, N. B. 2022. Herodotus and Imperial Greek Literature: Criticism, Imitation, Reception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, B. M. W. 1964. The Heroic Temper: Studies in Sophoclean Tragedy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Koenen, L. 1994. “Greece, the Near East, and Egypt: Cyclic Destruction in Hesiod and the Catalogue of Women,” TAPA 124: 1–34.Google Scholar
Köhnken, A. 1974. “Pindar as Innovator: Poseidon Hippios and the Relevance of the Pelops Story in Olympian 1,” CQ 24: 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koning, H. 2019. “Helen, Herakles and the End of the Heroes,” in Tsagalis, (ed.), 99–114.Google Scholar
Korhonen, K. (ed.). 2006. Tropes for the Past: Hayden White and the History/Literature Debate. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, R. 1985. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kowerski, L. 2005. Simonides on the Persian Wars: A Study of the Elegiac Verses of the “New Simonides”. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuhrt, A. 2007. The Persian Empire: A Corpus of Sources from the Achaemenid Period. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kullmann, W. 1999. “Homer and Historical Memory,” in Mackay, E. A. (ed.), Signs of Orality: The Oral Tradition and Its Influence in the Greek and Roman World. Leiden: Brill, 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurke, L. 1999. Coins, Bodies, Games and Gold: The Politics of Meaning in Archaic Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurke, L. 2011. Aesopic Conversations: Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lang, M. L. 1984. Herodotean Narrative and Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lardinois, A. P. M. H. 2006. “Have We Solon’s Verses?” in Blok, and Lardinois, (eds.), 16–35.Google Scholar
Latacz, J. 1975. “Zur Forschungsarbeit an den direkten Reden bei Homer (1950–1970),” Grazer Beiträge 3: 395–422.Google Scholar
Latacz, J. 1977. Kampfparänese, Kampfdarstellung und Kampfwirklichkeit in der Ilias, bei Kallinos und Tyrtaios. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Latacz, J. 2004. Troy and Homer: Towards a Solution of an Old Mystery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lateiner, D. 1977. “No Laughing Matter: A Literary Tactic in Herodotus,” TAPA 107: 173–82.Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. 1986. “The Empirical Element in the Methods of Early Greek Medical Writers and Herodotus: A Shared Epistemological Response,” Antichthon 20: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lateiner, D. 1987. “Nonverbal Communication in the Histories of Herodotus,” in Boedeker, (ed.), 83–119.Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. 1989. The Historical Method of Herodotus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, R. 1943. “Aeschylus on the Defeat of Xerxes,” in Studies in Honor of William Abbott Oldfather. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 82–93.Google Scholar
Lattimore, R. (trans.). 1951. The Iliad of Homer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. M. 1991. First-Person Fictions: Pindar’s Poetic “I”. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. M. 1995. “The First Person in Pindar Reconsidered – Again,” BICS 40: 139–50.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. M. 2012. The Lives of the Greek Poets, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lendon, J. E. 2017a. “Battle Description in the Ancient Historians, Part I: Structure, Array, and Fighting,” G&R 64.1: 39–64.Google Scholar
Lenfant, D. 2017b. “Battle Description in the Ancient Historians, Part II: Speeches, Results, and Sea Battles,” G&R 64.2: 145–67.Google Scholar
Lenfant, D. (ed.) 2004. Ctésias de Cnide: la Perse, l’Inde, autres fragments. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. 2009. “Archaic Knowledge,” in Wians, W. (ed.), Logos and Muthos: Philosophical Essays in Greek Literature. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 13–28.Google Scholar
Lesky, A. 1966. “Decision and Responsibility in the Tragedy of Aeschylus,” JHS 86: 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. 2006. Solon the Thinker: Political Thought in Archaic Athens. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. B. 1988b. “Herodotus on Cambyses: Some Thoughts on Recent Work,” in Kuhrt, A. and Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. (eds.), Achaemenid History III: Method and Theory. Leiden: Brill, 55–66.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1987. The Revolutions of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. (ed.). 2007. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Aeschylus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. 1966. “Problems of Early Greek Tragedy: Pratinas and Phrynichus,” in Estudios sobre la tragedia griega. Madrid: Fundación Pastor de Estudios Clásicos, 11–33.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. 1975. Female of the Species: Semonides on Women. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (trans.). 1979. Aeschylus: The Oresteia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. 1983. The Justice of Zeus, 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lombardo, M. 1983. “Habrosune e habrá nel mondo greco arcaico,” in Nenci, G. and Vallet, G. (eds.), Forme di contatto e processi di transformazione nelle società antiche. Atti del Convegno di Cortona 24–30 May 1981. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore, 1077–1103.Google Scholar
Long, T. 1987. Repetition and Variation in the Short Stories of Herodotus, Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie, vol. 179. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1986. The Invention of Athens: The Funeral Oration in the Classical City, trans. Sheridan, A.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Louden, B. 2006. The Iliad: Structure, Myth, and Meaning. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luppe, W. 1994. “Die Korinther in der Schlacht von Plataiai bei Simonides nach Plutarch (Simon. Fr. 15 und 16 W2; P. Oxy. 3965 Fr. 5),” APF 40: 21–4.Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. 2001a. “Local Knowledge in Herodotus’ Histories,” in Luraghi, (2001b), 138–60.Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. (ed.). 2001b. The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, N. 2003. “The Imaginary Conquest of the Helots,” in Luraghi, N. and Alcock, S. (eds.), Helots and Their Masters in Laconia and Messenia: Histories, Ideologies, Structures. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies, 109–41.Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. 2013. “The Stories Before the Histories: Folktale and Traditional Narrative in Herodotus,” in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Volume 1 Herodotus and the Narrative of the Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 87–112.Google Scholar
Mackie, H. 2003. Graceful Errors: Pindar and the Performance of Praise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macleod, C. (ed.). 1982. Homer Iliad Book XXIV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macleod, C. 1983b. “Homer on Poetry and the Poetry of Homer,” in Macleod, (1983a), 1–15.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. 1963. Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (ed.). 1982. Die Lieder des Bakchylides, Erster Teil: Die Siegeslieder. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maehler, H. (ed.). 2004. Bacchylides: A Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malkin, I. 1994. Myth and Territory in the Spartan Mediterranean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malkin, I. 2003. “‘Tradition’ in Herodotus: The Foundation of Cyrene,” in Derow, and Parker, (eds.), 153–70.Google Scholar
Mansour, K. 2007. “Séquences dactyliques dans la prose d’Hérodote. Hexamètres, homérismes, formules,” in Blanc, A. and Dupraz, E. (eds.), Procédés synchroniques de la langue poétique en grec et en latin. Brussels: Safran, 151–62.Google Scholar
Manuwald, B. 1991. “Oidipus und Adrastos: Bemerkungen zur neueren Diskussion um die Schuldfrage in Sophokles’ König Oidipus,” RhMus 135: 1–43.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. 1987. “Herodotean Narrative and the Narrator’s Presence,” in Boedeker, (ed.), 121–37.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. 1997. Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marincola, J. 2005. “Concluding Narratives: Looking to the End in Classical Historiography,” PLLS 12: 285–320.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. 2006. “Herodotus and the Poetry of the Past,” in Dewald, and Marincola, (eds.), 13–28.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (ed.). 2007c. A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marincola, J. 2010. “Aristotle’s Poetics and ‘Tragic History,’” in Tsitstiridis, S. (ed.), Parachoregema (Festschrift G. M. Sifakis). Heraklion: Crete University Press, 445–59.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. 2018. “Ὁμηρικώτατος? Battle Narratives in Herodotus,” in Bowie, (ed.), 3–24.Google Scholar
Marincola, J., Llewellyn-Jones, L., and Maciver, C. (eds.). 2012. Greek Notions of the Past in the Archaic and Classical Eras. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. P. 1989. The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. 1993. “The Seven Sages as Performers of Wisdom,” in Dougherty, and Kurke, (eds.), 108–28.Google Scholar
Masaracchia, A. (ed.). 1978. Erodoto La Sconfitta dei Persiani Libro IX delle Storie. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Masson, O. 1976. “Le nom de Battos, fondateur de Cyrène, et un groupe de mots grecs apparentés,” Glotta 54: 84–98.Google Scholar
Matijašić, I. 2022a. “Introduction: How Homeric Was Herodotus? Ancient and Modern Readers,” in Matijašić, (2022b), 1–37.Google Scholar
Matijašić, I. (ed.). 2022b. “Herodotus: The Most Homeric Historian?,” Histos Supplement 14. Oxford: Histos.Google Scholar
McClure, L. 2006. “Maternal Authority and Heroic Disgrace in Aeschylus’s Persae,” TAPA 136: 71–97.Google Scholar
McPhee, B. D. 2018. “A Mad King in a Mad World: The Death of Cambyses in Herodotus,” Histos 12: 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, M. 1998. Aristokraten und Damoden. Untersuchungen zur inneren Entwicklung Spartas im 7. Jahrhundert v. Chr. und zur politischen Funktion der Dichtung des Tyrtaios. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Meiggs, R. and Lewis, D. (eds.). 1988. A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions to the End of the Fifth Century B.C., revised ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meuli, K. 1975. “Ein altpersischer Kriegsbrauch,” in Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. ii. Basel: Schwabe, 699–729.Google Scholar
Michelini, A. N. 1982. Tradition and Dramatic Form in the Persians of Aeschylus. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikalson, J. 2003. Herodotus and Religion in the Persian Wars. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Millender, E. G. 2002. ‘Νόμος Δεσπότης: Spartan Obedience and Athenian Lawfulness in Fifth-Century Thought,” in Gorman, V. B. and Robinson, E. W. (eds.), Oikistes: Studies in Constitutions, Colonies, and Military Power in the Ancient World Offered in Honor of A. J. Graham. Leiden: Brill, 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. M. 1982. “Phthonos and Parphasis: The Argument of Nemean 8.19–34,” GRBS 23: 111–20.Google Scholar
Mitchel, F. 1956. “Herodotus’ Use of Genealogical Chronology,” Phoenix 10: 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. M. 2000. “Cyrene: Typical or Atypical?” in Brock, R. and Hodkinson, S. (eds.), Alternatives to Athens: Varieties of Political Organization and Community in Ancient Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 82–102.Google Scholar
Moles, J. 1993. “Truth and Untruth in Herodotus and Thucydides,” in Gill, and Wiseman, (eds.), 88–121.Google Scholar
Moles, J. 1996. “Herodotus Warns the Athenians,” Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 9: 259–84.Google Scholar
Moles, J. 1999. “Anathema kai Ktema: The Inscriptional Inheritance of Ancient Historiography,” Histos 3: 27–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, J. 2007. “‘Saving’ Greece from the ‘Ignominy’ of Tyranny? The ‘Famous’ and ‘Wonderful’ Speech of Socles (5.92),” in Irwin, and Greenwood, (eds.), 245–68.Google Scholar
Molyneux, J. H. 1972. “Two Problems Concerning Heracles in Pindar Olympian 9.28–41,” TAPA 103: 301–27.Google Scholar
Montanari, F., Rengakos, A., and Tsagalis, C. (eds.). 2009. Brill’s Companion to Hesiod. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, K. A. 2015. Pindar and the Construction of Syracusan Monarchy in the Fifth Century B. C. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, I. 2001. Revised edition of Morris (1986), in Cairns, D. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Homer’s Iliad. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 57–91.Google Scholar
Morris, I. and Powell, B. (eds.). 1997. A New Companion to Homer. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Most, G. W. 1985. The Measures of Praise: Structure and Function in Pindar’s Second Pythian and Seventh Nemean Odes. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Most, G. W. 1997. “Hesiod’s Myth of the Five (or Three or Four) Races,” PCPS 43: 104–27.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (ed.). 2018. Hesiod, 2nd ed., 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moyer, I. S. 2002. “Herodotus and an Egyptian Mirage: The Genealogies of the Theban Priests,” JHS 122: 70–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, I. S. 2011. Egypt and the Limits of Hellenism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mülke, C. (ed.). 2002. Solons politische Elegien und Iamben (fr. 1–13; 32–37 West): Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Munich: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
Munson, R. V. 1986. “The Celebratory Purpose of Herodotus: The Story of Arion in Histories 1.23–24,” Ramus 15: 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munson, R. V. 1991. “The Madness of Cambyses (Herodotus 3.16–38),” Arethusa 24: 43–65.Google Scholar
Munson, R. V. 2001b. Telling Wonders: Ethnographic and Political Discourse in the Work of Herodotus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munson, R. V. 2006. “An Alternate World: Herodotus and Italy,” in Dewald, and Marincola, (eds.), 257–73.Google Scholar
Munson, R. V. 2007. “The Trouble with the Ionians: Herodotus and the Beginning of the Ionian Revolt (5.28–38.1),” in Irwin, and Greenwood, (eds.), 146–67.Google Scholar
Munson, R. V. 2012. “Herodotus and the Heroic Age: The Case of Minos,” in Baragwanath, and de Bakker, (eds.), 195–212.Google Scholar
Murnaghan, S. 2001. “The Superfluous Bag: Rhetoric and Display in the Histories of Herodotus,” in Wooten, C. W. (ed.), The Orator in Action and Theory in Greece and Rome: Essays in Honor of George A. Kennedy. Leiden: Brill, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murnaghan, S. 2021. “More on Herodotus and Sophocles: Herodotus at Colonus,” YouTube, Herodotus Helpline, May 5, 2021. www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QaowDD3p3M.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 2001. “Herodotus and Oral History,” in Luraghi, (ed.), 16–44 (orig. in Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. and Kuhrt, A. (eds.), Achaemenid History II: The Greek Sources (Leiden 1987), 93–115).Google Scholar
Myres, J. L. 1914. “Herodotus the Tragedian,” in Elton, O. (ed.), A Miscellany Presented to Dr. J.M. McKay. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 88–96.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1990. Pindar’s Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G. 1999. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nenci, G. (ed.). 1994. Erodoto Le Storie Libro V La Rivolta della Ionia. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Nenci, G. (ed.). 1998. Erodoto Le Storie Libro VI La Battaglia di Maratona. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H. G. 1992. “Göttliche Gerechtigkeit und das Schicksal des Menschen in Solons Musenelegie,” MH 49: 91–104.Google Scholar
Nickau, K. 1990. “Mythos und Logos bei Herodot,” in Ax, W. (ed.), Memoria Rerum Veterum: Neue Beiträge zur antiken Historiographie und alten Geschichte. Festschrift für Carl Joachim Classen zum 60. Geburtstag. Stuttgart: Steiner, 83–100.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. 2000. “Sages, Sophists, and Philosophers: Greek Wisdom Literature,” in Taplin, O. (ed.), Literature in the Greek World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 138–73.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. 2007. “The Philosophers in Archaic Greek Culture,” in Shapiro, H. A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Archaic Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 169–98.Google Scholar
Nisetich, F. J. 1989. Pindar and Homer. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Noussia, M. (ed.). 2001. Solone. Frammenti dell’ opera poetica. Milan: Biblioteca Universale.Google Scholar
Noussia, M. 2006. “Strategies of Persuasion in Solon’s Elegies,” in Blok, and Lardinois, (eds.), 134–56.Google Scholar
Noussia-Fantuzzi, M. (ed.). 2010. Solon the Athenian, the Poetic Fragments. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obbink, D. 2001. “The Genre of Plataea: Generic Unity in the New Simonides,” in Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.), 65–85.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. 2005. “4708. Archilochus, Elegies (More of VI 854 and XXX 2507),” The Oxyrhynchus Papyri 69: 18–42.Google Scholar
Ogden, D. 2025. The Tyrants of Corinth: Legends of Cypselus and Periander. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Olson, S. D. (ed.). 2002. Aristophanes Acharnians. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormand, K. 2014. The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women and Archaic Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, R. 2004. “Homer’s Society,” in Fowler, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 206–19.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. 2009. Greece in the Making, 1200–479 BC, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostwald, M. 1969. Nomos and the Beginnings of the Athenian Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ostwald, M. 2002. “Tragedians and Historians,” Scripta Classica Israelica 21: 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostwald, M. 2009. “Herodotus and Athens,” in Language and History in Ancient Greek Culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 265–77 (orig. in ICS 16: 137–48).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packman, Z. M. 1991. “The Incredible and the Incredulous: The Vocabulary of Disbelief in Herodotus, Thucydides, and Xenophon,” Hermes 119: 399–414.Google Scholar
Page, D. L. 1951. A New Chapter in the History of Greek Tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Page, D. L. 1955. Sappho and Alcaeus: An Introduction to the Study of Ancient Lesbian Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, R. C. T. 1989. “Spartan Religion,” in Powell, A. (ed.), Classical Sparta: Techniques behind Her Success. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 142–72.Google Scholar
Parker, R. C. T. 2005. Polytheism and Society at Athens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, V. 2007. “Herodotus’ Use of Aeschylus’ Persae as a Source for the Battle of Salamis,” SO 82: 2–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlou, M. 2012. “Pindar and the Reconstruction of the Past,” in Marincola et al. (eds.), 95–112.Google Scholar
Pearson, A. C. (ed.). 1917. The Fragments of Sophocles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pelliccia, H. 1992. “Sappho 16, Gorgias’ Helen, and the Preface to Herodotus’ Histories,” YCS 29: 63–84.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1991. “Thucydides’ Archidamus and Herodotus’ Artabanus,” in Flower, M. and Toher, M. (eds.), Georgica: Greek Studies in Honour of George Cawkwell. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 120–42.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1996. “The Urine and the Vine: Astyages’ Dreams at Herodotus 1.107–8,” CQ 46: 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1997a. “Aeschylus’ Persae and History,” in Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.), Greek Tragedy and the Historian. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1997b. “East Is East and West Is West – Or Are They?” Histos 1: 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1999. “Epilogue,” in Kraus, C. (ed.), The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts. Leiden: Brill, 325–60.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2002. “Speech and Action: Herodotus’ Debate on the Constitutions,” PCPS 48: 123–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2006b. “Homer and Herodotus,” in Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. G. F., and Lyne, R. O. A. M. (eds.), Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition Presented to Jasper Griffin by Former Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2006c. “Speech and Narrative in the Histories,” in Dewald, and Marincola, (eds.), 103–21.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2007. “Aristagoras (5.49–55, 97),” in Irwin, and Greenwood, (eds.), 179–201.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2013. “Intertextuality, Plausibility, and Interpretation,” Histos 7: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2019. Herodotus and the Question Why. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2020. “Homer and the Question Why,” in Constantakopoulou, and Fragoulaki, (eds.), 1–35.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2022. “Homeric and Herodotean Intertextuality: What’s the Point?” in Matijašić, (ed.), 39–58.Google Scholar
Pfeijffer, I. L. 2005. “Propaganda in Pindar’s First Pythian Ode,” in Pfeijffer, I. L. and Enenkel, K. A. E. (eds.), The Manipulative Mode: Political Propaganda in Antiquity: A Collection of Case Studies. Leiden: Brill, 13–42.Google Scholar
Pitcher, L. V. 2007. “Characterization in Ancient Historiography,” in Marincola, (ed.), 102–17.Google Scholar
Podlecki, A. J. 1984. The Early Greek Poets and Their Times. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlenz, M. 1937. Herodot: der erste Geschichtsschreiber des Abendlandes. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. 1993. Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Priestley, J. 2014. Herodotus and Hellenistic Culture: Literary Studies in the Reception of the Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puelma, M. 1989. “Der Dichter und die Wahrheit in der griechischen Poetik von Homer bis Aristoteles,” MH 46: 65–100Google Scholar
Purves, A. C. 2010. Space and Time in Ancient Greek Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purvis, A. L. (trans.). 2007. The Landmark Herodotus, ed. Strassler, R. B.. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 1987. “Herodotus, Political Thought, and the Meaning of History,” in Boedeker, (ed.), 221–48.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 1998. “A Historian’s Headache: How to Read ‘Homeric Society’?” in Fisher, N. and van Wees, H. (eds.), Archaic Greece: New Approaches and New Evidence. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 169–93.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 2002. “Philosophy, Science, Politics: Herodotus and the Intellectual Trends of His Time,” in Bakker et al. (eds.), 149–86.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 2004. The Discovery of Freedom in Ancient Greece, trans. Franciscono, R.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Race, W. H. 1982. The Classical Priamel from Homer to Boethius. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radt, S. (ed.). 1977. Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, Vol. 4: Sophocles. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Rasch, J. 1913. Sophocles quid debeat Herodoto in rebus ad fabulas exornandas adhibitis. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Rawles, R. 2018. Simonides the Poet: Intertextuality and Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfield, J. M. 1975. Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hektor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reece, S. 1993. The Stranger’s Welcome: Oral Theory and the Aesthetics of the Homeric Hospitality Scene. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regenbogen, O. 1961a. “Eine Forschungsmethode antiker Naturwissenschaft,” in Dirlmeieir, F. (ed.), Kleine Schriften. Munich: Beck, 141–94.Google Scholar
Regenbogen, O. 1961b. “Herodot und sein Werk,” in Dirlmeier, F. (ed.), Kleine Schriften. Munich: Beck, 57–100.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. 1960. “Herodots Persergeschichten,” in Becker, C. (ed.), Vermächtnis der Antike: Gesammelte Essays zur Philosophie und Geschichtsschreibung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 133–74.Google Scholar
Rengakos, A. 1999. “Spannungstrategien in den homerischen Epen,” in Kazazis, J. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Euphrosyne: Studies in Ancient Epic and Its Legacy in Honor of Dimitris N. Maronitis. Stuttgart: Steiner, 308–38.Google Scholar
Rengakos, A. 2001. “Epic Narrative Technique in Herodotus’ Histories,” Seminari romani di cultura greca 4: 253–70.Google Scholar
Rengakos, A. 2006. “Homer and the Historians: The Influence of Epic Narrative Technique on Herodotus and Thucydides,” in La Poésie Épique Grecque. Métamorphoses d’un Genre Litteraire. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 183–209.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P. J. 1981. A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athēnaiōn Politeia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P. J. 2003. “Herodotean Chronology Revisited,” in Derow and Parker (eds.), 58–72.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P. J. 2006. “The Reforms and Laws of Solon: An Optimistic View,” in Blok, and Lardinois, (eds.), 248–60.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (ed.). 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary, VI: Books 21–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, S. 1990. The Homeric Narrator. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, S. 1996. “Truth in the Tales of the Odyssey,” Mnemosyne 49: 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieks, R. 1975. “Eine tragische Erzählung bei Herodot (Hist. 1, 34–45),” Poetica 7: 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D. 1993. “The Frustrated Mourner: Strategies of Closure in Greek Tragedy,” in Rosen, R. and Farrell, J. (eds.), Nomodeiktes: Greek Studies in Honor of Martin Ostwald. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 573–89.Google Scholar
Rollinger, R. 2004. “Herodotus, Human Violence and the Ancient Near East,” in Karageorghis, V. and Taifacos, I. (eds.), The World of Herodotus. Nicosia: A. G. Leventis Foundation, 121–50.Google Scholar
Romm, J. 1989. “Herodotus and Mythic Geography: The Case of the Hyperboreans,” TAPA 119: 97–113.Google Scholar
Romm, J. 1992. The Edges of the Earth in Ancient Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romm, J. 2006. “Herodotus and the Natural World,” in Dewald, and Marincola, (eds.), 178–91.Google Scholar
Rood, T. C. B. 1998. Thucydides: Narrative and Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rood, T. C. B. 2006. “Herodotus and Foreign Lands,” in Dewald, and Marincola, (eds.), 290–305.Google Scholar
Rood, T. C. B. 2010. “Herodotus’ Proem: Space, Time, and the Origins of International Relations,” Ariadne 16: 43–74.Google Scholar
Rood, T. C. B. 2022. “Mythical and Historical Time in Herodotus: Scaliger, Jacoby, and the Chronographic Tradition,” in Kingsley et al. (eds.), 62–81.Google Scholar
Rosén, H. B. 1962. Eine Laut- und Formenlehre der herodotischen Sprachform. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Rösler, W. 1980. “Die Entdeckung der Fiktionalität in der Antike,” Poetica 12: 283–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rösler, W. 1990. “Mnemosyne in the Symposion,” in O. Murray (ed.), Sympotica: A Symposium on the Symposion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 230–7.Google Scholar
Rudhardt, J. 1981. “Le mythe hésiodique des races et celui de Prométhée: Recherches des structures et des significations,” in Du mythe, de la religion grecque et de la comprehension d’autrui. Geneva: Droz, 246–81.Google Scholar
Russell, D. 1995. Longinus On the Sublime, revision of translation by Fyfe, W. H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Russo, J. 1999. “Stesichorus, Homer, and the Forms of Early Greek Epic,” in Kazazis, J. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Euphrosyne: Studies in Ancient Epic and Its Legacy in Honor of Dimitris N. Maronitis. Stuttgart: Steiner, 339–48.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. 2001. “The New Simonides: Toward a Commentary,” in Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.), 33–54.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. 2009. “Hesiod and the Literary Traditions of the Near East,” in Montanari, , Rengakos, , and Tsagalis, (2009), 9–35.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. 2013. State Pilgrims and Sacred Observers in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, R. 2012a. Greek Tragic Style: Form, Language and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, R. 2012b. “Structure in Epic and Historiography,” in Foster, E. and Lateiner, D. (eds.), Thucydides and Herodotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, R. 2013. Homer, 2nd ed. Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics No. 41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. 1992–3. “Pourquoi Psyttalie ou Comment transformer combat navale en défaite terrestre,” GITA 7: 53–69.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. 2005. “Aeschylean Tragedy,” in Gregory, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek Tragedy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 215–32.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. 2007. “Tragedy and Reversal: The Example of the Persians,” in Lloyd, (ed.), 71–92.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. 2012. “Herodotus and the ‘Myth’ of the Trojan War,” in Baragwanath, and de Bakker, (eds.), 87–105.Google Scholar
Sammons, B. 2010. The Art and Rhetoric of the Homeric Catalogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sammons, B. 2012. “History and Hyponoia: Herodotus and Early Literary Criticism,” Histos 6: 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. 1985. “The Death of Cyrus: Xenophon’s Cyropaedia as a Source for Iranian History,” AI 25: 459–71.Google Scholar
Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. 2002. “The Personality of Xerxes, King of Kings,” in Bakker et al. (eds.), 579–90.Google Scholar
Scardino, C. 2007. Gestaltung und Funktion der Reden bei Herodot und Thukydides. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, A. 1998. “Simonides’ Elegy on Plataia: The Occasion of its Performance,” ZPE 123: 25–30.Google Scholar
Schadewaldt, W. 1934. “Die Anfänge der Geschichtsschreibung bei den Griechen,” Die Antike 10: 144–68.Google Scholar
Schadewaldt, W. 1982. Die Anfänge der Geschichtsschreibung bei den Griechen, Tübinger Voerlesungen Vol. ii. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Schein, S. 1984. The Mortal Hero: An Introduction to Homer’s Iliad. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, S. 1997. “The Iliad: Structure and Interpretation,” in Morris, and Powell, (eds.), 345–59.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. and Stählin, O.. 1929. Geschichte der griechischen Literatur, Vol. i. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. and Stählin, O. 1934. Geschichte der griechischen Literatur, Vol. i.2: Die griechische Literatur in der Zeit der attischen Hegemonie vor den Eingreifen der Sophistik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Scholfield, A. F. 1958. Aelian On Animals, Vol. 1: Books 1–5. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schreckenberg, H. 1964. Ananke: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Wortgebrauchs, Zetemata 36. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 2001. “Poetic Authority and Oral Tradition in Hesiod and Pindar,” in Watson, J. (ed.), Speaking Volumes: Orality and Literacy in the Greek and Roman World. Leiden: Brill, 109–37.Google Scholar
Scullion, S. 2006. “Herodotus and Greek Religion,” in Dewald and Marincola (eds.), 192–208.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1971b. The Theme of the Mutilation of the Corpse in the Iliad. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. 1983. “Kleos and Its Ironies in the Odyssey,” Antiquité Classique 52: 22–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. 1986. Pindar’s Myth-Making: The Fourth Pythian Ode. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. 1996. “Catharsis, Audience, and Closure in Greek Tragedy,” in Silk, M. S. (ed.), Tragedy and the Tragic: Greek Theatre and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 149–72.Google Scholar
Sewell-Rutter, N. J. 2007. Guilt by Descent: Moral Inheritance and Decision Making in Greek Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S. 1994. “Learning through Suffering: Human Wisdom in Herodotus,” CJ 89: 349–55.Google Scholar
Shaw, P.-J. 2001. “Lords of Hellas, Old Men of the Sea: The Occasion of Simonides’ Elegy on Plataea,” in Boedeker and Sider (eds.), 164–82.Google Scholar
Sheehan, S. 2018. A Guide to Reading Herodotus’ Histories. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sicking, C. M. J. 1998. “Solon on Wealth,” in Distant Companions: Selected Papers. Leiden: Brill, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, D. 2001. “Fragments 1–22 W2: Text, Apparatus Criticus, and Translation,” in Boedeker and Sider (eds.), 13–29.Google Scholar
Sider, D. 2006. “The New Simonides and the Question of Historical Elegy,” AJP 127: 327–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, D. (ed.). 2020. Simonides: Epigrams and Elegies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siegmann, E. 1987. Homer: Vorlesungen über die Odysee. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Skinner, J. E. 2012. The Invention of Greek Ethnography from Homer to Herodotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slings, S. R. 2002. “Oral Strategies in the Language of Herodotus,” in Bakker et al. (eds.), 53–77.Google Scholar
Slotty, F. 1927. “Die Stellung des Griechischen und anderer idg. Sprachen zu dem soziativen und affektischen Gebrauch des Plurals der ersten Person,” IF 45: 348–63.Google Scholar
Smith, D. G. 2017. “The Reception of Aeschylus in Sicily,” in Kennedy, R. F. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aeschylus. Leiden: Brill, 7–53.Google Scholar
Smith, P. 1980. “History and the Individual in Hesiod’s Myth of Five Races,” CW 74: 145–63.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1974. Two Crucial Decisions in Herodotus. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Solmsen, L. 1943. “Speeches in Herodotus’ Account of the Ionic Revolt,” AJP 64: 194–207.Google Scholar
Sordi, M. (ed.). 1988. Responsabilità perdono e vendetta nel mondo antico. Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1988. “‘Myth’ and History: On Herodotus III.48 and 50–53,” Opuscula Atheniensia 17.II: 167–82 (repr. in ‘Reading’ Greek Culture: Texts and Images, Rituals and Myth (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), 244–84).Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1997. “The Hesiodic Myth of the Five Races and the Tolerance of Plurality in Greek Mythology,” in Palagia, O. (ed.), Greek Offerings: Essays on Greek Art in Honour of John Boardman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–21.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. A. 1989. A Commentary on Plutarch’s Pericles. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. A. 1992. “Herodotus and the Athenian Arche,” ASNP Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, serie III 22: 781–809.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. A. 1997. “Herodotus and the North Carolina Oral Narrative Tradition,” Histos 1: 13–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadter, P. A. 2004. “From the Mythical to the Historical Paradigm: The Transformation of Myth in Herodotus,” in Candau Morón, J. M., Gonzalez Ponce, F. J., and Cruz Andreotti, G. (eds.), Historia y mito: El pasado legendario como fuente de autoridad. Malaga: Centro de ediciones de la Diputación de Málaga, 31–46.Google Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. 1975. “Learning through Suffering? Croesus’ Conversations in the History of Herodotus,” YCS 24: 1–36.Google Scholar
Stambler, S. 1982. “Herodotus,” in James Luce, T. (ed.), Ancient Writers I. New York: Scribners, 209–31.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. M. 2001. “A Bard of the Iron Age and His Auxiliary Muse,” in Boedeker and Sider (eds.), 106–19.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. M. 2006. “Solon’s Self-Reflexive Political Persona and Its Audience,” in Blok and Lardinois (eds.), 79–113.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. 1969. “Das Erwachen des geschichtlichen Bewusstseins in der Polis,” in Steinmetz, P. (ed.), Politeia und Res Publica. Beiträge zum Verständnis von Politik, Recht und Staat in der Antike. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 52–78.Google Scholar
Stinton, T. C. W. 1987. “The Apotheosis of Heracles from the Pyre.” JHS Suppl. XIV: 1–16.Google Scholar
Suárez de la Torre, E. 1985. “El viaje nocturne del sol y la Nanno de Mimnermo,” EClás. 27: 5ff.Google Scholar
Swift, L. A. 2014. “Telephus on Paros: Genealogy and Myth in the ‘New Archilochus’ Poem (P Oxy. 4708),” CQ 64: 433–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabó, M. 1978. “Die Rolle der Atys-Adrastos-Geschichte in Herodots Kroisos-Logos,” Acta Classica Universitatis Scientiarum Debreceniensis 14: 9–17.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. P. 1990. “Agamemnon’s Role in the Iliad,” in Pelling, C. (ed.), Characterization and Individuality in Greek Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 60–82.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. P. 1992. Homeric Soundings: The Shaping of the Iliad. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taplin, O. P. 2006. “Aeschylus’ Persai: The Entry of Tragedy into the Celebration Culture of the 470s?” in Cairns, D. and Liapis, V. (eds.), Dionysalexandros: Essays on Aeschylus and His Fellow Tragedians in Honour of Alexander F. Garvie. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 1–10.Google Scholar
Thalmann, W. 1980. “Xerxes’ Rags: Some Problems in Aeschylus’ Persians,” AJP 101: 260–82.Google Scholar
Thalmann, W. 1984. Conventions of Form and Thought in Early Greek Epic Poetry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 1989. Oral Tradition and Written Record in Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. 1995. “The Place of the Poet in Archaic Society,” in Powell, A. (ed.), The Greek World. London: Routledge, 104–29.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2000. Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science and the Art of Persuasion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2001. “Herodotus’ Histories and the Floating Gap,” in Luraghi (ed.), 198–210.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2012. “Herodotus and Eastern Myths and Logoi: Deioces the Mede and Pythios the Lydian,” in Baragwanath, and de Bakker, (eds.), 233–53.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2018. “Truth and Authority in Herodotus’ Narrative: False Stories and True Stories,” in Bowie (ed.), 265–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, R. 2000. “The Spectation of Gyges in P. Oxy. 2382 and Herodotus Book 1,” ClAnt 19: 330–59.Google Scholar
Tribulato, O. 2022. “The Homericness of Herodotus’ Language (with a Case Study of -éein Aorist Infinitives in the Histories),” in Matijašić (ed.), 241–85.Google Scholar
Tsagalis, C. (ed.). 2019. Poetry in Fragments: Studies on the Hesiodic Corpus and Its Afterlife. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tuplin, C. J. 2022. “Poet and Historian: The Impact of Homer in Herodotus’ Histories,” in Matijašić, (ed.), 287–374.Google Scholar
Van der Veen, J. E. 1996. The Significant and the Insignificant: Five Studies in Herodotus’ View of History. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandiver, E. 1991. Heroes in Herodotus: The Interaction of Myth and History. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Vandiver, E. 2012. “‘Strangers Are from Zeus’: Homeric Xenia at the Courts of Proteus and Croesus,” in Baragwanath, and de Bakker, (eds.), 143–66.Google Scholar
Vannicelli, P. 2007. “To Each His Own: Simonides and Herodotus on Thermopylae,” in Marincola (ed.) 315–21.Google Scholar
Vannicelli, P. (ed.). 2017. Erodoto Le Storie Libro VII Serse e Leonida. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Van Noorden, H. 2015. Playing Hesiod: The “Myth of the Races” in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Wees, H. 1995. “Politics and the Battlefield: Ideology in Greek Warfare,” in Powell, A. (ed.), The Greek World. London: Routledge, 153–78.Google Scholar
Van Wees, H. 1999. “Tyrtaeus’ Eunomia: Nothing to do with the Great Rhetra,” in Hodkinson, S. and Powell, A. (eds.), Sparta: New Perspectives. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 1–41.Google Scholar
Van Wees, H. 2006. “Mass and Elite in Solon’s Athens: The Property Classes Revisited,” in Blok and Lardinois (eds.), 351–89.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. 1983. “The Principles of Greek Literary Criticism,” Mnemosyne 36: 14–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. 1988. Commentaries on Pindar, Volume ii: Olympian Odes 1, 10, 11, Nemean 11, Isthmian 2. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdin, H. 1977. “Les remarques critiques d’Hérodote et Thucydide sur la poésie en tant que source historique,” Symbolae 6: 53–76.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1980. “The Myth of Prometheus in Hesiod,” in Myth and Society in Ancient Greece, trans. Lloyd, J.. London: Methuen, 168–85.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1982. “From Oedipus to Periander: Lameness, Tyranny, Incest in Legend and History,” Arethusa 15: 19–38.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1983a. “Hesiod’s Myth of the Races: An Essay in Structural Analysis,” in Vernant (1983c), 3–32.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1983b. “Hesiod’s Myth of the Races: A Reassessment,” in Vernant (1983c), 33–72.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1983c. Myth and Thought among the Greeks. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. S. 1977. “Polycrates and His Ring: Two Neglected Aspects,” Studi Storico-Religiosi 1: 17–46.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. S. 1987. “What Did Ancient Man See When He Saw a God? Some Reflections on Greco-Roman Epiphany,” in van der Plas, D. (ed.), Effigies Dei. Leiden: Brill, 42–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versnel, H. S. 2011. Coping with the Gods: Wayward Readings in Greek Theology. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veyne, P. 1988. Did the Greeks Believe in Their Myths? Trans. Wissing, P.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vöhler, M. 2005. “‘Ich aber’: Mythenkorrekturen in Pindars 1. Olympie,” in Vöhler, M. and Seidensticker, B. (eds.), Mythenkorrekturen: Zu einer paradoxalen Form der Mythenrezeption. Berlin: de Gruyter, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcot, P. 1978. Envy and the Greeks: A Study of Human Behaviour. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Wallinga, H. T. 2005. Xerxes’ Greek Adventure: The Naval Perspective. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, G. 1984. The Varieties of Enchantment: Early Greek Views of the Nature and Function of Poetry. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Waterfield, R. (trans.). 1998. Herodotus The Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waters, K. H. 1971. Herodotos on Tyrants and Despots: A Study in Objectivity. Historia Einzelschriften 15. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Waters, K. H. 1985. Herodotos the Historian: His Problems, Methods and Originality. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Webber, A. 1989. “The Hero Tells His Name: Formula and Variation in the Phaeacian Episode of the Odyssey,” TAPA 119: 1–13.Google Scholar
Weçowski, M. 2004. “The Hedgehog and the Fox: Form and Meaning in the Prologue of Herodotus,” JHS 124: 143–64.Google Scholar
Wesselmann, K. 2007. “Xerxes und die Frau des Masistes (Hdt. 9.108–113). Mythische Erzählstruktur in Herodots Historien,” in Bierl, A., Lämmle, R., and Wesselmann, K. (eds.), Literatur und Religion 2: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1–40.Google Scholar
Wesselmann, K. 2011. Mythische Erzählstrukturen in Herodots Historien. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesselmann, K. 2017. “Se non é vero: On the Use of Untrue Stories in Herodotus,” in Ruffell, I. and Hau, L. I. (eds.), Truth and History in the Ancient World: Pluralising the Past. New York: Routledge, 130–54.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 2013. The Epic Cycle: A Commentary on the Lost Troy Epics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, S. R. 1999. “Sophocles’ Antigone and Herodotus Book Three,” in Griffin, J. (ed.), Sophocles Revisited: Essays Presented to Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–36.Google Scholar
West, S. R. 2002. Demythologisation in Herodotus. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikolaia Kopernika.Google Scholar
West, S. R. 2003. “Croesus’ Second Reprieve and Other Tales of the Persian Court,” CQ 53: 416–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, S. R. 2004b. “Herodotus on Aristeas,” in Tuplin, C. J. (ed.), Pontus and the Outside World: Studies in Black Sea History, Historiography, and Archaeology. Leiden: Brill, 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, S. R. 2015. “Agariste’s Betrothal: The Adaptability of a Cautionary Tale,” Lucida intervalla 44: 7–35.Google Scholar
White, H. 1978. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H. 1981. “The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality,” in Mitchell (ed.), 1–23.Google Scholar
Whitman, C. H. 1958. Homer and the Heroic Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. 1893. Aristoteles und Athen, Vol. i. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 2002. Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, N. G. 2015. Herodotea: Studies on the Text of Herodotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. 1983. “Zeus in Persae,” in Studies in Aeschylus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–15.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1998. Roman Drama and Roman History. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Woodard, R. D. 2007. “Hesiod and Greek Myth,” in Woodard, R. D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 83–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooten, C. (trans.). 1987. Hermogenes’ On Types of Style. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Yates, D. C. 2019. States of Memory: The Polis, Panhellenism, and the Persian War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, T. C. Jr. 1988. “The Early History of the Medes and the Persians and the Achaemenid Empire to the Death of Cambyses,” CAH vol. iv, 1–52.Google Scholar
Zali, V. 2015. The Shape of Herodotean Rhetoric: A Study of the Speeches in Herodotus’ Histories with Special Attention to Books 5–9. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zali, V. 2018. “Herodotus Mapping Out His Genre: The Interaction of Myth and Geography in the Libyan Logos,” in Bowie (ed.), 125–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. 1965. “The Motif of the Corrupted Sacrifice in Aeschylus’ Oresteia,” TAPA 96: 463–508.Google Scholar
Zielinski, T. 1899–1901. “Die Behandlung gleichzeitiger Ereignisse im antiken Epos,” Philologus Suppl. 8: 405–49.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.