Figures
4.2Binominal probability of right, you know, yeah and eh variants by speaker age
4.3A visual summary of the generalised linear model reported in Table 4.4
4.4Proportional frequency of you know by discourse context in three broad age groups
4.5Proportional frequency of right by discourse context in three broad age groups
5.1Location of targeted peripheral communities and locations of previous GE research
5.3Distribution of GE types comparing elderly interviewees and younger interviewers
5.5Proportion of long vs. short GE variants with pro-form ‘something’
5.6Proportion of long vs. short GE variants with generic ‘thing(s)’
5.7Proportion of long vs. short GE variants with pro-form ‘everything’
5.8Proportion of long vs. short GE variants with generic ‘stuff’
5.9Distribution of and all, and that, and all that by community
5.10Proportion of and that in the Roots Archive compared to Berwick-upon-Tweed
6.1Distribution of quotative variants used by adult Anglo-Australians born between 1870 and 1980
6.2Relative frequency of quotative frame-introduced direct speech and internal thought among adult Anglo-Australians born between 1870 and 1980
8.2Phenogram of intensifier variation across registers and corpora
8.3Phenogram of intensifier variation across registers and corpora – focus on register variation
8.4Phenogram of intensifier variation across registers and corpora – focus on geographical variation
8.5Phenogram of intensifier use in public conversations (S1B), unscripted monologues (S2A) and letters (W1B)
10.1Frequency of quotative and discourse particle like across Common Room (CR) girls and non-Common Room (NCR) girls