Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-kl2l2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-05T11:02:13.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Computer Skills Required for Medical Research: Social Media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

P. M. Shaughn O'Brien
Affiliation:
Keele University School of Medicine
Fiona Broughton Pipkin
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Kemp, S, We are Social: Digital in 2016. Weblog. Available from: http://wearesocial.com/uk/special-reports/digital-in-2016/Google Scholar
DeCamp, M, Cunningham, A.M. Social media: the way forward or a waste of time for physicians? J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2013; 43(4):318–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Royal College of General Practitioners. RCGP Social Media Highway Code. Available from: www.rcgp.org.uk/social-mediaGoogle Scholar
Brown, J, Ryan, C, Harris, A. How Doctors view and use social media: A national survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2014; 16(12):e267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, P. ‘Birthing sheds, the cabbage patch and madwives’: Irreverent tweets by hospital medic Welsh Gas Doc provoke angry backlash. Daily Mail. 17 September 2011. Available from: http://dailym.ai/1BuSeR4Google Scholar
Chretien, K, Azar, J, Kind, T. Physicians on Twitter. JAMA. 2011;305(6):566–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Brynolf, A, Johansson, S, Appelgren, E, Lynoe, N, Edstedt Bonamy, A-K. Virtual colleagues, virtually colleagues – physicians’ use of Twitter: A population-based observational study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(7).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheston, CC, Flickinger, TE, Chisolm, MS. Social media use in medical education. Acad Med. 2013 Jun;88(6):893901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, CS, Bonaca, MA, Ryan, JJ, Massaro, JM, Barry, K, Loscalzo, J. A randomized trial of social media from Circulation. Circulation. 2015 Jan 6;131(1):2833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennet, S. SocialTimes: The 5 stages Of ‘getting’ Twitter. Weblog. www.adweek.com/digital/getting-twitter/Google Scholar
The Office of National Statistics. Summary of Internet Access Households and Individuals, 2013. Available from: http://bit.ly/1GD8gg5Google Scholar
The General Medical Council. Doctors’ use of social media (2013). Available from: www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/21186.aspGoogle Scholar
Thompson, MA. Social media in clinical trials. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014:e101–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riesel, J, Greenberg, SLM, Holmer, H, Meara, JG. Utilizing social media to disseminate information and engage feedback: Experiences from the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2013;219(3):S61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, TM. CDC, Ebola & Tweet Chats: was this venue a success? Weblog. Available from: www.symplur.com/blog/cdc-ebola-tweet-chats-success/Google Scholar
Ferguson, H, Wheat, KL. Early career academic mentoring using Twitter: the case of #ECRchat. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2015;37(1):313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunn, A. Survey of the general public: attitudes towards health research. The United Kingdom: Health Research Authority. 2013. Available from: www.hra.nhs.uk/documents/2013/11/survey-general-public-attitudes-towards-health-research.pdfGoogle Scholar
Harris, J, Kearley, K, Heneghan, C, Meats, E, Roberts, N, Perera, R, et al. Are journal clubs effective in supporting evidence-based decision making? A systematic review. BEME Guide No. 16. Med Teach. 2011;33(1):923.Google ScholarPubMed
Thangasamy, IA, Leveridge, M, Davies, BJ, Finelli, A, Stork, B, Woo, HH. International Urology Journal Club via Twitter: 12-month experience. Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):112–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leung, E, Tirlapur, S, Siassakos, D, Khan, K. #BlueJC: BJOG and Katherine Twining Network collaborate to facilitate post-publication peer review and enhance research literacy via a Twitter journal club. BJOG. 2013;120(6):657–60.Google Scholar
Young, SD, Cumberland, WG, Nianogo, R, Menacho, LA, Galea, JT, Coates, T. The HOPE social media intervention for global HIV prevention in Peru: A cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet HIV. 2014;2(1): e27e32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clar, C, Dyakova, M, Curtis, K, Dawson, C, Donnelly, P, Knifton, L, Clarke, A. Just telling and selling: current limitations in the use of digital media in public health: A scoping review. Public Health. Dec 2014;128(12):1066–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seglen, PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ. 1997 Feb 15;314(7079):498502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moed, HF. The future of research evaluation rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review. Science and Public Policy. 2007;34(8):575–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquhoun, D, Plested, A. The BMJ Blog: Why Altmetrics is bad for science – and healthcare. London: The British Medical Journal. Available from: http://bmj.co/1GLMgzTGoogle Scholar
Gunther, E. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e123.Google Scholar
Thelwall, M, Haustein, S, Larivière, V, Sugimoto, CR. Do Altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e64841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, C. #SMChat – Exploring the possibilities of social media. Weblog. Available from: https://socialmediachat.wordpress.com/Google Scholar
Van Noorden, R. Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature. 2014 Aug 14;512(7513):126–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×