Book contents
- Fetal Medicine
- Advanced Skills Series
- Fetal Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Genetics and antenatal screening
- Section 2 Embryology, fetal physiology and fetal anatomy
- Section 3 Fetal anomalies
- Section 4 Fetal disease
- Section 5 Termination of pregnancy
- Section 6 Fetal growth and wellbeing
- Section 7 Multiple pregnancy
- Section 8 Placenta, amniotic membrane and amniotic fluid
- Section 9 Diagnostic and therapeutic invasive procedures
- Index
- References
Section 6 - Fetal growth and wellbeing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2016
Book contents
- Fetal Medicine
- Advanced Skills Series
- Fetal Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Genetics and antenatal screening
- Section 2 Embryology, fetal physiology and fetal anatomy
- Section 3 Fetal anomalies
- Section 4 Fetal disease
- Section 5 Termination of pregnancy
- Section 6 Fetal growth and wellbeing
- Section 7 Multiple pregnancy
- Section 8 Placenta, amniotic membrane and amniotic fluid
- Section 9 Diagnostic and therapeutic invasive procedures
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fetal Medicine , pp. 269 - 296Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
References
Kovo, M, Schreiber, L, Ben-Haroush, A, et al. The placental factor in early- and late-onset normotensive fetal growth restriction. Placenta 2013; 34(4): 320–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The investigation and management of the SGA fetus. RCOG Green-Top Guidelines No. 31. London: RCOG Press, February 2013.Google Scholar
Gardosi, J, Chang, A, Kalyan, B, et al. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992; 339(8788): 283–7.Google Scholar
Persson, B, Stangenberg, M, Lunell, NO, et al. Prediction of size of infants at birth by measurement of symphysis fundus height. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93(3): 206–11.Google Scholar
Gardosi, J. Customised assessment of fetal growth potential: implications for perinatal care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97(5): F314–7.Google Scholar
Papageorghiou, AT, Ohuma, EO, Altman, DG, et al. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 2014; 384(9946): 869–79.Google Scholar
Gagnon, A, Wilson, RD, Audibert, F, et al. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Genetics Committee. Obstetrical complications associated with abnormal maternal serum markers analytes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008; 30(10): 918–49.Google Scholar
Goetzinger, KR, Cahill, AG, Macones, GA, et al. Echogenic bowel on second-trimester ultrasonography: evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117(6): 1341–8.Google Scholar
Chauhan, SP, Cole, J, Sanderson, M, et al. Suspicion of intrauterine growth restriction: Use of abdominal circumference alone or estimated fetal weight below 10%. J Matern Fet Neonatal Med 2006; 19(9): 557–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Burd, I, Srinivas, S, Paré, E, et al. Is sonographic assessment of fetal weight influenced by formula selection? J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28(8): 1019–24.Google Scholar
Nabhan, AF, Abdelmoula, YA. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (3): CD006593.Google ScholarPubMed
Cnossen, JS, Morris, RK, ter Riet, G, et al. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. CMAJ 2008; 178(6): 701–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhide, A, Acharya, G, Bilardo, CM, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 233–9.Google Scholar
Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GML. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 11: CD007529.Google Scholar
Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U. The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21(2): 124–7.Google Scholar
Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Weiner, CP, et al. Qualitative venous Doppler waveform analysis improves prediction of critical perinatal outcomes in premature growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22(3): 240–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Grivell, RM, Alfirevic, Z, Gyte, GML, et al. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (1): CD007863.Google Scholar
Serra, V, Moulden, M, Bellver, J, et al. The value of the short-term fetal heart rate variation for timing the delivery of growth-retarded fetuses. BJOG 2008; 115(9): 1101–7.Google Scholar
Bujold, E, Roberge, S, Lacasse, Y, et al. Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116(2): 402–14.Google Scholar
Boers, KE, Vijgen, SM, Bijlenga, D, et al. DIGITAT Study Group. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ 2010; 341: c7087.Google Scholar
Severi, FM, Bocchi, C, Visentin, A, et al. Uterine and fetal cerebral Doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19(3): 225–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Antenatal corticosteroids to prevent respiratory distress syndrome. RCOG Green-Top Guidelines No. 7. London: RCOG, Press, October 2010.Google Scholar
Turan, OM, Turan, S, Gungor, S, et al. Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32(2): 160–7.Google Scholar
GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short-term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 2003; 110(1): 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, DM, Marlow, N, Upstone, L, et al. The Growth Restriction Intervention Trial: long-term outcomes in a randomized trial of timing of delivery in fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204(1): 34. e1–9.Google Scholar
Lees, C, Marlow, N, Arabin, B, et al. TRUFFLE Group. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42(4): 400–8.Google Scholar
Crowther, CA, Middleton, PF, Bain, E, et al; WISH Project Team. Working to improve survival and health for babies born very preterm: the WISH project protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13: 239.Google Scholar
Ebbing, C, Rasmussen, S, Kiserud, T. Fetal hemodynamic development in macrosomic growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38(3): 303–8.Google Scholar
Irion, O, Boulvain, M. Induction of labor for suspected fetal macrosomia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD000938.Google Scholar
Mulik, V, Usha Kiran, TS, Bethal, J, et al. The outcome of macrosomic fetuses in a low risk primigravid population. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003; 80(1): 15–22.Google Scholar
Baschat, AA. Neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction and its relationship with antepartum parameters of placental dysfunction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37(5): 501–14.Google Scholar
Crispi, F, Figueras, F, Cruz-Lemini, M, et al. Cardiovascular programming in children born small for gestational age and relationship with prenatal signs of severity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207(2): 121.e1–9Google Scholar
Boney, CM, Verma, A, Tucker, R, et al. Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics 2005; 115(3): e290–6.Google Scholar
Ganzervoort, W, Alfirevic, Z, von Dadelszen, P, et al. STRIDER: Sildenafil Therapy In Dismal prognosis Early-onset intrauterine growth Restriction–a protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data and aggregate data meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Syst Rev 2014; 3: 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Bricker, L, Neilson, JP, Dowswell, T. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks’ gestation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; CD001451.Google ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Reduced fetal movements. RCOG Green-Top Guidelines No.57. London: RCOG Press, February 2011.Google Scholar
Tveit, JV, Saastad, E, Stray-Pedersen, B, et al. Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines – a clinical quality improvement. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009; 9: 32.Google Scholar
Bhide, A, Acharya, G, Bilardo, CM, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 233–9.Google Scholar
Gómez, O, Figueras, F, Fernández, S, et al. Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11–41 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32(2): 128–32.Google Scholar
Velauthar, L, Plana, MN, Kalidindi, M, et al. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis involving 55,974 women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43(5): 500–7.Google Scholar
Gallo, DM, Poon, LC, Akolekar, R, et al. Prediction of preeclampsia by uterine artery Doppler at 20–24 weeks’ gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013; 34(4): 241–7.Google Scholar
Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GML. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (11): CD007529.Google Scholar
Acharya, G, Wilsgaard, T, Berntsen, GK, et al. Reference ranges for serial measurements of blood velocity and pulsatility index at the intra-abdominal portion, and fetal and placental ends of the umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26(2): 162–9.Google Scholar
Mari, G, Deter, RL, Carpenter, RL, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal red-cell alloimmunization. Collaborative Group for Doppler Assessment of the Blood Velocity in Anemic Fetuses. N Engl J Med 2000; 342(1): 9–14.Google Scholar
Stirnemann, JJ, Mougeot, M, Proulx, F, et al. Profiling fetal cardiac function in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35(1): 19–27.Google Scholar
Nabhan, AF, Abdelmoula, YA. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 3: CD006593.Google Scholar
Grivell, RM, Alfirevic, Z, Gyte, GML, et al. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 2: CD007863.Google Scholar
Devane, D, Lalor, JG, Daly, S, et al. Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 2: CD005122.Google Scholar
Serra, V, Moulden, M, Bellver, J, et al. The value of the short-term fetal heart rate variation for timing the delivery of growth-retarded fetuses. BJOG 2008; 115(9): 1101–7.Google Scholar
Huntleigh Healthcare Ltd. Sonicaid Team Operator’s Manual. Cardiff: Huntleigh Healthcare Diagnostic Products Division, 2005.Google Scholar
Manning, FA. Fetal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999; 26(4): 557–77.Google Scholar
Lalor, JG, Fawole, B, Alfirevic, Z, et al. Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 1: CD000038.Google Scholar
Turan, S, Turan, OM, Berg, C, et al. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30(5): 750–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, JB, Chauhan, SP, Magann, EF, et al. Intrapartum fetal surveillance: review of three national guidelines. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29(7): 539–50.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. CG190. London: NICE, December 2014.Google Scholar
Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D, Gyte, GML. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 5: CD006066.Google Scholar
Skupski, DW, Rosenberg, CR, Eglinton, GS. Intrapartum fetal stimulation tests: a meta‐analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99(1): 129–34.Google Scholar
East, CE, Smyth, RMD, Leader, LR, et al. Vibroacoustic stimulation for fetal assessment in labour in the presence of a nonreassuring fetal heart rate trace. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 1: CD004664.Google Scholar
East, CE, Chan, FY, Colditz, PB, et al. Fetal pulse oximetry for fetal assessment in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 2: CD004075.Google Scholar
East, CE, Leader, LR, Sheehan, P, et al. Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 3: CD006174.Google Scholar
MacLennan, A. A template for defining a causal relation between acute intrapartum events and cerebral palsy: international consensus statement. BMJ 1999; 319(7216): 1054–9.Google Scholar
Kruger, K, Hallberg, B, Blennow, M, et al. Predictive value of fetal scalp blood lactate concentration and pH as markers of neurologic disability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181(5): 1072–8.Google Scholar
Neilson, JP. Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 5: CD000116.Google Scholar
Becker, JH, Bax, L, Amer-Wåhlin, I, et al. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119(1): 145–54.Google Scholar