Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T22:07:08.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Cultural Legacies of Eurasian Empires

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2017

Edited by
Hyun Jin Kim ,
Frederik Juliaan Vervaet  and
Selim Ferruh Adali
Hyun Jin Kim
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Frederik Juliaan Vervaet
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Selim Ferruh Adali
Affiliation:
Ankara Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi, Turkey
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Eurasian Empires in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages
Contact and Exchange between the Graeco-Roman World, Inner Asia and China
 , pp. 133 - 150
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Allberry, C.R.C. and Ibscher, H. (ed. and trans.) 1938. A Manichaean Psalm-Book. Part II. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Altheim, F. 1968 ‘Die vier Weltreiche in den manichäischen Kephalaia’, in Nagel, P. (ed.) Probleme der koptischen Literatur. Tagungsmaterialien der II. koptologischen Arbeitskonferenz des Instituts für Byzantinistik 12. und 13. Dezember. Halle, 115–19.Google Scholar
Andreas, F.C. and Henning, W.B. 1933. Mitteliranische Manichaica aus Chinesisch-Turkestan, II. Berlin.Google Scholar
Böhlig, A. 1966. Kephalaia. Zweite Hälfte. Lieferung 11/12 (Seite 244–291). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Boyce, M. 1960. A Catalogue of the Iranian Manuscripts in Manichean Script in the German Turfan Collection. Berlin.Google Scholar
Boyce, M. 1975. A Reader in Manichaean Middle Persian and Parthian. Leiden.Google Scholar
Chabot, J.B. 1902. Synodicon orientale ou recueil de synods nestoriens. Paris.Google Scholar
Chavannes, É. and Pelliot, P. 1913. ‘Un traité Manichéen retrouvé en Chine’ Journal Asiatique 99–199, 261–394.Google Scholar
Christensen, A.E. 1936. L’Iran sous les Sassanides. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Clark, L. 1982 ‘The Manichaean Turkic Pothi-Book’ Altorientalische Forschungen 9: 145–218.Google Scholar
Clark, L. 1997. ‘The Turkic Manichaean Literature’, in Mirecki, P. and BeDuhn, J. (eds.) Emerging from Darkness: Studies in the Recovery of Manichaean Sources. Leiden, 89–141.Google Scholar
Clark, L. 2000. ‘The Conversion of Bügü Khan to Manichaeism’, in Emmerick, R.E., Sundermann, W., and Zieme, P. (eds.) Studia Manichaica. IV. Internationaler Kongreß zum Manichäismus. Berlin, 14.18. Juli 1997. Berlin, 83–123.Google Scholar
Clark, L. 2013. Uygur Manichaean Texts: Volume II: Liturgical Texts – Texts, Translations, Commentary. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Clauson, G. 1972. An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth Century Turkish. Oxford.Google Scholar
Colditz, I. 1992. ‘Hymnen an Šãd-Ohrmezd’ Altorientalische Forschungen 19: 322–41.Google Scholar
Colditz, I. 1994. ‘Shãd-Ohrmezd and the Early History of the Manichaean Dīnãwaryīa-Community’, in Baldauf, I. and Friederich, M. (eds.) Bamberger Zentralasienstudien, Konferenzakten ESCAS IV, Bamberg 8.-12. Oktober 1991. Berlin, 229–34.Google Scholar
Decret, F. 1970. Aspects du manichéisme dans l’Afrique romaine. Les controverses de Fortunatus, Faustus et Felix avec saint Augustin. Paris.Google Scholar
Diakonoff, I.M. and Livshits, V.A. 2001. Parthian economic documents from Nisa: Texts I. London.Google Scholar
Durkin-Meisterernst, D. 2004. Dictionary of Manichaean Texts. Volume III,1: Texts from Central Asia and China (Texts in Middle Persian and Parthian). Turnhout.Google Scholar
Durkin-Meisterernst, D. and Morano, E. 2010. Mani’s Psalms: Middle Persian, Parthian and Sogdian texts in the Turfan collection. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Flügel, G. (ed.) 1871. Kitâb Al-Fihrist. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Fonkič, B.L. and Poljakov, F.B. 1990. ‘Paläographische Grundlagen der Datierung des Kölner Mani-Kodex’ Byantinische Zeitschrift 83: 22–30.Google Scholar
Forte, A. 1995. The Hostage An Shigao and His Offspring. Kyoto.Google Scholar
Funk, W.-P. (ed.) 1999. Kephalaia I. Zweite Hälfte (Lieferung 13–14). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Funk, W.-P. (ed.) 2000. Kephalaia I. Zweite Hälfte (Lieferung 15–16). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gabain, A. von and Winter, W. 1958. Türkische Turfantexte IX. Ein Hymnus auf den Vater Mani auf ‘Tocharisch’ B mit alttürkischer Übersetzung. Berlin.Google Scholar
Gabain, A. von. 1974. Alttürkische Grammatik. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Gardner, I. 1995. The Kephalaia of the Teacher: the Edited Coptic Manichaean Texts in Translation with Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar
Gardner, I. 1999. Coptic Documentary Texts from Kellis, Volume 1. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gardner, I. 2007. Kellis Literary Texts, Volume 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gardner, I. 2011. ‘Manichaean Ritual Practice at Ancient Kellis: A New Understanding of the Meaning and Function of the “Prayer of the Emanations”’, in Van den Bergh, J.A., Kotzé, A., Nicklas, T., and Scopello, M. (eds.) ‘In Search of Truth’: Augustine, Manichaeism and other Gnosticism. Studies for Johannes van Oort at Sixty. Leiden, 245–62.Google Scholar
Gardner, I.M.F., BeDuhn, J., and Dilley, P. 2015. Mani at the Court of the Persian Kings. Leiden.Google Scholar
Gardner, I.M.F. and Lieu, S.N.C. 2004. Manichaean Texts from the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Giversen, S. 1986–1988. The Manichaean Coptic Papyri in the Chester Beatty Library. Geneva.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. 1995. ‘East–West borrowings via the silk road of textile terms’ Diogenes – A Quarterly Publication of the International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies 171: 25–33.Google Scholar
Harmatta, J. 1971. ‘The Middle Persian – Chinese Bilingual Inscription from Hsian and the Chinese Sasanian Relations’, in Atti del Convegno internazionale sul tema: La Persia nel Medioevo. (Roma, 31 marzo-5 aprile l970). Rome, 366–7.Google Scholar
He, Qiaoyuan何喬遠. 1994. Minshu閩書, edited by a committee, 7 vols. Fujian. [First published in 154 books in 1629.]Google Scholar
Henning, W.B. 1940. Sogdica. London.Google Scholar
Henning, W.B. 1942. ‘Mani’s Last Journey’ Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 10: 941–53.Google Scholar
Henning, W.B. and Haloun, G. 1952. ‘The compendium of the doctrines and styles of the teaching of Mani, the Buddha of light’ Asia Major N.S. 3: 184–212.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. and Koenen, L. 1970. ‘Ein griechischer Mani-Codex (P. Colon. inv. nr. 4780)’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 5: 97–216.Google Scholar
Humbach, H. and Shìpíng, W. 1988. ‘Die pahlavi-chinesische Bilingue von Xi’an’, in Sundermann, W. and Vahman, F. (eds.) A Green Leaf: Papers in honour of Professor Jes P. Asmussen. Leiden, 73–82.Google Scholar
Hutter, M. 1992. Manis kosmogonische Šābuhragān-texte. Edition, Kommentar und literatur-geschichtliche Einordnung der manichäisch-mittelpersischen Handschriften M 98/99 I und M 7980–7984. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Huyse, P. 1999. Die dreisprachige Inschrift Šābuhrs I. an der Ka’ba-i Zardušt (ŠKZ). London.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R.G. 1995. ‘The Prayer of the Emanations from Kellis (T.Kellis 22)’ Le Muséon 108: 243–63.Google Scholar
Kaden, E.-H. 1953. ‘Die Edikte gegen die Manichäer von Diokletian bis Justinian’, in Festschrift Hans Lewald bei Vollendung des vierzigsten Amtsjahre als ordentlicher Professor im Oktober 1953. Basel, 55–68.Google Scholar
Khambatta, S. 1987. ‘Snow’s The Light and the Dark: Calvert and the Manichaean Heresy’ Theology 90: 193–99.Google Scholar
Klimkeit, H.-J. 1979 ‘Qut. Ein Grundbegriff in der zentralasiatischen Religionsbegegnung’, in Humanitas Religiosa. Festschrift für Haralds Biezais zu seinem 70. Geburtstag, dargebracht von Freunden und Kollegen. Stockholm, 252–60.Google Scholar
Kósa, G. 2011. ‘Translating a vision: rudimentary notes on the Chinese cosmology painting’ Manichaean Studies News Letter 25: 20–32.Google Scholar
Krüger, P. and Kunkel, W. 1954. Codex Justinianus. Berlin.Google Scholar
Le Coq, A. von. 1911. ‘Dr. Stein’s Turkish Khuastuanift from Tun-huang, being a confession-prayer of the Manichæan auditores’ Journal of the Royal Asaitic Society 277–314.Google Scholar
Le Coq, A. von. 1912. Türkische Manichaica aus Chotscho. I. Berlin.Google Scholar
Le Coq, A. von. 1919. Türkische Manichaica aus Chotscho. II, Berlin.Google Scholar
Le Coq, A. von. 1922. Türkische Manichaica aus Chotscho. III. Nebst einem christlichen Bruchstück aus Bulayïq. Berlin.Google Scholar
Lieu, S.N.C. 1988. ‘Fact and Fiction in the Acta Archelai’, in Bryder, P. (ed.) Manichaean Studies. Lund, 69–88.Google Scholar
Lieu, S.N.C. 2006. ‘“My Church is Superior …” Mani’s Missionary Statement in Coptic and Middle Persian’, in Painchuad, L. and Poirier, P.-H. (eds.) Coptica-Gnostica-Manichaica Mélanges offerts a Wolf-Peter-Funk. Quebec, 519–28.Google Scholar
Lieu, S.N.C. 2009. ‘Epigraphica Nestoriana Serica’, in Sundermann, W., Hintze, A., and de Blois, F. (eds.) Exegisti Monumenta. Festschrift in Honour of Nicholas Sims-Williams. Wiesbaden, 227–46.Google Scholar
Lieu, S.N.C. 2015. ‘The Diffusion, Persecution and Transformation of Manichaeism in Late Antiquity and Pre-Modern China’, in Papaconstantinou, A., McLynn, N., and Schwartz, D.L. (eds.) Conversion in Late Antiquity: Christianity, Islam, and Beyond. Farnham, 123–41.Google Scholar
Lieu, S.N.C., Fox, G., and Sheldon, J. 2011. Greek and Latin Sources on Manichaean Cosmogony and Ethics, Turnhout.Google Scholar
Lieu, S.N.C., Eccles, L., Franzmann, M., Gardner, I., and Parry, K. 2012. Medieval Christian and Manichaean Remains from Zayton (Quanzhou). Turnhout.Google Scholar
Lim, R. 1995. Public Disputation, Power, and Social Order in Late Antiquity. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, D.N. 1979. ‘Mani’s Šābuhragān’ Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 42: 500–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, D.N. 1980. ‘Mani’s Šābuhragān– II’ Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 43 (1980) 288–310.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, D.N. 1994. ‘I, Mani…’, in Preißler, H., Seiwert, H.M., and Mürmel, H. (eds.) Gnosisforschung und Religionsgeschichte, Festschrift für Prof. Kurt Rudolph. Marburg, 183–98.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, G.B. (ed.) 2006. Dictionary of Manichaean Texts, Volume III, 4: Texts from Central Asia and China: Texts in Chinese. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, G. 2015. ‘Recent Research on Chinese Manichaean Texts’, in Richter, S.G., Horton, C., and Ohlhafer, K. (eds.) Mani in Dublin: Selected Papers from the Seventh International Conference of the International Association of Manichaean Studies in the Chester Beatty Library, Dublin, 8–12 September 2009. Leiden, 259–72.Google Scholar
Minale, V.M. 2011. ‘Diritto bizantino ed eresia manichea Storia di un’ossessione’, in Lokin, J.H.A. and Stolte, B.H. (eds.) Introduzione al diritto bizantino. Da Giustiniano ad Basilici. Pavia, 351–78.Google Scholar
Minale, V.M. 2013. Legislazione imperiale e manicheismo da Diocleziano a Costantino – Genesi di un’eresia. Napoli.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. and Meyer, P.M. 1905. Codex Theodosianus. Berlin.Google Scholar
Müller, F.W.K. 1904a. ‘Handschriften-Reste in Estrangelo-Schrift aus Turfan, Chinesisch-Turkistan’ Sitzungsberichte der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 9: 348–52.Google Scholar
Müller, F.W.K. 1904b. Handschriften-Reste in Estrangelo-Schrift aus Turfan, Chinesisch-Turkistan. II. Teil. Berlin.Google Scholar
Müller, F.W.K. 1912. Soghdische Texte. I. Berlin.Google Scholar
Pedersen, N.A. 1997 ‘A Manichaean historical text’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 119: 193–201.Google Scholar
Pedersen, N.A. 2006. Manichaean Homilies: with a number of hitherto unpublished fragments. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Pedersen, N.A. and Larsen, J.M. (eds.) 2013. Manichaean Texts in Syriac, First Editions, New Editions and Studies. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Pelliot, P. 1923. ‘Les traditions manichéennes au Fou-kien’ Toung P’ao 22: 193–208.Google Scholar
Polotsky, H.-J. 1934. Manichäische Homilien. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Polotsky, H.-J. and Böhlig, A. 1940. Manichäische Handschriften der Staatlichen Museen Berlin: Kephalaia, Lfg. 1–10. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Provasi, E. 2011. ‘New Persian Texts in Manichaean Script from Turfan’, in Maggi, M. and Orsatti, P. (eds.) The Persian Language in History. Wiesbaden, 119–77.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, E.G. 1985. ‘An Shih-kao’ Encyclopaedia Iranica 1: 1000–1.Google Scholar
Reck, C. 2006. Berliner Turfanfragmente manichäischen Inhalts in soghdischer Schrift, Verzeichnis der orientalischen Handschriften in Deutschland; Bd. XVIII, 1 = Mitteliranische Handschriften, Teil 1. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Richter, S. 1998. Die Herakleides Psalmen. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Richter, S.G., Horton, C., and Ohlhafer, K. (eds.) 2015. Mani in Dublin: Selected Papers from the Seventh International Conference of the International Association of Manichaean Studies in the Chester Beatty Library, Dublin, 8–12 September 2009. Leiden.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.M. 2000. ‘The Fate of the Manichaean Codices of Medinet Madi 1929–1989’, in Emmerick, R.E., Sundermann, W., and Zieme, P. (eds.) Studia Manichaica. IV. Internationaler Kongreß zum Manichäismus. Berlin, 14.18. Juli 1997. Berlin, 19–62.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.M. 2015. The Manichaean Codices of Medinet Madi. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rubio, F.B. 2009. ‘Further remarks on the Manichaean nature of Εὐχὴ τῶν προβολῶν’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 168: 221–38.Google Scholar
Saeki, Y.P. 1951. The Nestorian Documents and Relics in China. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Schafer, E. 1951. ‘Iranian Merchants in T’ang Dynasty Tales’, in W.J. Fischel (ed.) Semitic and Oriental Studies: A Volume Presented to William Popper. Berkeley, 403–22.Google Scholar
Schipper, H.G. and Van Oort, J. (eds.) 2000. Sancti Leonis Magni Romani Pontificis, Sermones et Epistolae. Fragmenta selecta, Turnhout.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Glintzer, H. 1987. Chinesische Manichaica. Mit textkritischen Anmerkungen und einem Glossar. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Sims-Williams, N. and Durkin-Meisterernst, D. (eds.) 2012. Dictionary of Manichaean Texts. Volume III, 2: Dictionary of Manichaean Sogdian and Bactrian, Turnhout.Google Scholar
Sims-Williams, N. 2009. ‘The Bactrian fragment in Manichaean script (M 1224)’, in Durkin-Meisterernst, D., Reck, C., and Weber, D. (eds.) Literarische Stoffe und ihre Gestaltung in mitteliranischer Zeit. Kolloquium anlässlich des 70. Geburtstags von Prof. Dr. W. Sundermann. Wiesbaden, 245–68.Google Scholar
Staatliche Museen zu Berlin. Papyrus-Sammlung. 1991. Leben im ägyptischen Altertum – Literatur Urkunden, Briefe aus vier Jahrtausenden. Berlin.Google Scholar
Sundermann, W. 1970. ‘Die iranischen Texte’, in Schubarth-Engelschall, K. (ed.) Orientalische Bibliotheken und Sammlungen. Berlin, 54–61.Google Scholar
Sundermann, W. 1991. ‘Completion and Correction of Archaeological Work by Philological Means: the Case of the Turfan Texts’, in Bernard, P. and Grenet, F. (eds.) Histoire et cultes de l’Asie Centrale préislamique. Sources écrites et documents archéologiques. Actes du Colloque international du CNRS (Paris 1988). Paris, 283–8.Google Scholar
Sundermann, W. 1995. ‘Dīnāvarīya’ Encyclopædia Iranica 7: 418–19.Google Scholar
Sundermann, W. 2001. ‘Der Manichäismus an der Seidenstraße: Aufstieg, Blüte und Verfall’, in Hübner, U., Kamlah, J., and Reinfandt, L. (eds.) Die Seidenstraße: Handel und Kulturaustausch in einem eurasiatischen Wegenetz. Hamburg, 153–68.Google Scholar
Sundermann, W. 2016. ‘Manichaeism on the Silk Road: Its Rise, Flourishing and Decay’, B. Hendrischke, trans., in Lieu, S.N.C. and Mikkelsen, G. (eds.) Between Rome and China: History, Religions and Material Culture of the Silk Road. Turnhout, 75–90.Google Scholar
Sundermann, W. and Thilo, T. 1966. ‘Zur mittelpersisch-chinesischen Grabinschrift aus Xi’an (Volksrepublik China)’ Mitteilungen des Instituts für Orientforschung 11: 437–50.Google Scholar
Taishō shinshu daizōkyō. 1924–29. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Tekin, T. 1968. A Grammar of Orkhon Turkic. Bloomington.Google Scholar
Wilkens, J. 2000. Manichäisch-türkische Texte der Berliner Turfansammlung, Verzeichnis der orientalischen Handschriften in Deutschland; Bd. XIII, 16 = Alttürkische Handschriften, Teil 8. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Wurst, G. 1996. Psalm Book. Die Bema-Psalmen. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Xiaohe, M. 2009. ‘Remains of the religion of light in Xiapu (霞浦) County, Fujian Province’ Ou-Ya Xuekan 9: 81–108.Google Scholar
Xiaohe, M. 2010. ‘Monijiao shitian wang kao – Fujian Xiapu wenshu yanjiu’ [‘The King of Ten Heavens in Manichaeism – a Study of a Document from Xiapu, Fujian’] Xiyu wenshi 5: 119–30.Google Scholar
Yoshida, Y. 1983. ‘Manichaean Aramaic in the Chinese hymnscroll’ Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 46: 326–31.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×