Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T02:49:10.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 16 - Behavioral Stakeholder Theory

from Part V - New Voices in Stakeholder Thinking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2019

Jeffrey S. Harrison
Affiliation:
University of Richmond
Jay B. Barney
Affiliation:
University of Utah
R. Edward Freeman
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Robert A. Phillips
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributions and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 507525.Google Scholar
Amcor. (2016). Annual report 2016. Retrieved from www.amcor.com/investors/financial-information/annual-reports.Google Scholar
Brickson, S. L. (2005). Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4): 576609.Google Scholar
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogenous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 107125.Google Scholar
Burke, M. J., Borucki, C. C., & Hurley, A. E. (1992). Reconceptualizing psychological climate in a retail service environment: A multiple-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5): 717729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carillion. (2015). Annual report and accounts 2015. Retrieved from www.annualreports.co.uk/Company/carillion-plc.Google Scholar
Carter, M. Z., & Mossholder, K. W. (2015). Are we on the same page? The effects of congruence between supervisor and group trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5): 13491363.Google Scholar
Crilly, D., Hansen, M. & Zollo, M. (2016). The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firms’ sustainability claims and stakeholders’ interpretation. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2): 705729.Google Scholar
Crilly, D., Ni, N., & Jiang, Y. (2016). Do no harm versus do good social responsibility. Attributional thinking and the liability of foreignness. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7): 13161329.Google Scholar
Crilly, D., & Sloan, P. (2012). Corporate attention to stakeholders: Enterprise logic and an inside-out explanation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(10): 11741193.Google Scholar
Crilly, D., & Sloan, P. (2014). Autonomy or control? Organizational architecture and corporate attention to stakeholders. Organization Science, 25(2): 339355.Google Scholar
Duflo, E., Dupas, P., & Kremer, M. (2015). Education, HIV, and early fertility: Experimental evidence from Kenya. American Economic Review, 105(9): 27572797.Google Scholar
Dutton, J. E., & Jackson, S. E. (1987). Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Academy of Management Review, 12(1): 7690.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory. The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D., & Ocasio, W. (2007). Perspective – Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organization Science, 18(3): 523536.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. S., & van der Laan Smith, J. (2015). Responsible accounting for stakeholders. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7): 935960.Google Scholar
Henisz, W. J., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. (2014). Spinning gold: The financial returns to external stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 17271748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22: 125139.Google Scholar
Ireland, M. E., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching in writing: Synchrony in essays, correspondence, and poetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99: 549571.Google Scholar
Jaworska, S., & Nanda, A. (2017). Doing well by talking good: A topic-modelling assisted discourse study of corporate social responsibility. Applied Linguistics, 39(3): 373399.Google Scholar
Kivleniece, I., & Quelin, B. V. (2012). Creating and capturing value in public-private ties: A private actor’s perspective. Academy of Management Review, 37: 272299.Google Scholar
Lankoski, L., Smith, C. S., & Van Wassenhove, L. (2016). Stakeholder judgments of value. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(2): 227256.Google Scholar
Love, E. G., & Kraatz, M. (2017). Failed stakeholder exchanges and corporate reputation: The case of earnings misses. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3): 880903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. (1962). The business firm as a political coalition. Journal of Politics, 24(4): 662678.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22: 853886.Google Scholar
Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., & Fox, C. R. (2011). Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 13691386.Google Scholar
Selten, R., & Warglien, M. (2007). The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(18): 73617366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strategic Management Society. (2017). Stakeholder strategy. Retrieved from www.strategicmanagement.net/ig/stakeholder_strategy.php.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2): 534544.Google Scholar
Weitzner, D., & Deutsch, Y. (2015). Understanding motivation and social influence in stakeholder prioritization. Organization Studies, 36(10): 13371360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×