Agam-Segal, Reshef. 2012. Reflecting on Language from “Sideways-on”: Preparatory and Non-Preparatory Aspects-Seeing. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 1: 1–17.Google Scholar

Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2010. Epistemic Identities. Episteme 7: 128–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, William P. 1964. Philosophy of Language. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Alston, William P. 2000. Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth. 1995. Knowledge, Human Interests and Objectivity in Feminist Epistemology. Philosophical Topics 23: 27–58.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . [1946]. Politics, translated by Barker, Ernest. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, [1955]. Aristotelis Fragmenta Selecta, edited by Ross, W. D.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, [2000]. Nicomachean Ethics, translated and edited by Crisp, Roger. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. 1946. Other Minds. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 20: 148–87. Cited after the reprint in Austin [1961/79].Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. 1957. A Plea for Excuses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57: 1–30. Cited after the reprint in Austin [1961/79].Google Scholar

Austin, J. L.[1961/79]. Philosophical Papers, third edition, edited by Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J.. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L.[1962/75]. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered in Harvard University in 1955, second edition, edited by Urmson, J. O. and Marina, Sbisà. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Gordon. [2004]. Wittgenstein’s Method: Neglected Aspects, edited by Morris, Katherine J.. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S.. 1980/2009. Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning, second edition, extensively revised by Hacker, P. M. S.. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S. 1984. Language, Sense and Nonsense: A Critical Investigation into Modern Theories of Language. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S. 1985/2009. Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar, and Necessity, second edition, extensively revised by Hacker, P. M. S.. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Baz, Avner. 2003. On When Words Are Called For: Cavell, McDowell, and the Wording of Our World. Inquiry 46: 473–500.Google Scholar

Baz, Avner.2010. On Learning from Wittgenstein, or What Does It Take to See the Grammar of Seeing Aspects? In Day, William and Krebs, Victor J., eds., Seeing Wittgenstein Anew, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baz, Avner.2011. Seeing Aspects and Philosophical Difficulty. In McGinn, Marie and Kuusela, Oskari, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baz, Avner.2012. When Words Are Called For: A Defense of Ordinary Language Philosophy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Baz, Avner.2016a. Aspects of Perception. In Kemp, Gary and Mras, Gabriele M., eds., Wollheim, Wittgenstein, and Pictorial Representation, Routledge.Google Scholar

Baz, Avner.2016b. The Sound of Bedrock: Lines of Grammar between Kant, Wittgenstein, and Cavell. European Journal of Philosophy 24: 607–28.Google Scholar

Baz, Avner.2017. The Crisis of Method in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bealer, George. 1998. Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy. In DePaul, Michael R. and Ramsey, William, eds., Rethinking Intuition, Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Bealer, George 1999. A Theory of the A Priori. Philosophical Perspectives 13: 29–55.Google Scholar

Beaney, Michael. 1996. Frege: Making Sense. Duckworth.Google Scholar

Beaney, Michael.2005. Imagination and Creativity. The Open University.Google Scholar

Beaney, Michael.2007. Frege’s Use of Function-Argument Analysis and His Introduction of Truth-Values as Objects. Grazer Philosophische Studien 75: 93–123.Google Scholar

Beaney, Michael.2017a. Analytic Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Beaney, Michael.2017b. Wittgenstein and Frege. In Glock, Hans-Johann and Hyman, John, eds., A Companion to Wittgenstein, Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Beaney, Michael.2018. Conceptual Creativity in Philosophy and Logic. In Gaut, Berys and Kieran, Matthew, eds., Creativity and Philosophy, Routledge.Google Scholar

Beaney, Michael and Clark, Bob. 2018. Seeing-As and Mathematical Creativity. In Harrington, Brendan, Shaw, Dominic, and Beaney, Michael, eds., Aspect Perception After Wittgenstein, Routledge.Google Scholar

Black, Max. 1964. A Companion to Wittgenstein’s “Tractatus.” Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boden, Margaret A. 1990/2004. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, second edition. Routledge.Google Scholar

Boden, Margaret A. 1994. What Is Creativity? In Boden, Margaret A., ed., Dimensions of Creativity, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Boden, Margaret A. 2010. Creativity and Art: Three Roads to Surprise. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boghossian, Paul. 1989. The Rule-Following Considerations. Mind 98: 507–49.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert B. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert B. 2000. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Britton, Karl. 1999. Portrait of a Philosopher. In Flowers, F. A. III, ed., Portraits of Wittgenstein, volume 2, Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar

Bronzo, Silver. 2017. Wittgenstein, Theories of Meaning, and Linguistic Disjunctivism. European Journal of Philosophy 25: 1340–63.Google Scholar

Burge, Tyler. 2005. Disjunctivism and Perceptual Psychology. Philosophical Topics 33: 1–78.Google Scholar

Cambiano, Giuseppe. 1993. La figura del filosofo e le altre forme del sapere. Quaderni di Storia 37: 75–87.Google Scholar

Cappelen, Herman. 2012. Philosophy without Intuitions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. 1939. Foundations of Logic and Mathematics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf.1945. The Two Concepts of Probability. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5: 513–32.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf.1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf.1963. P. F. Strawson on Linguistic Naturalism. In Schilpp, P. A., ed., The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court.Google Scholar

Carus, A. W. 2007. Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought: Explication as Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. 1958. Must We Mean What We Say? Inquiry 1: 172–212.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley.1962. The Availability of Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy. The Philosophical Review 71: 67–93.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley.1969/2002. Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays, updated edition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley.1979. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley.1996. Notes and Afterthoughts on the Opening of Wittgenstein’s Investigations. In Sluga, Hans and Stern, David G., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Child, William. 2010. Wittgenstein’s Externalism. In Whiting, Daniel, ed., The Later Wittgenstein on Language, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Child, William.2011. Wittgenstein. Routledge.Google Scholar

Child, William.2017. Sensations, Natural Properties, and the Private Language Argument. In Cahill, Kevin and Raleigh, Thomas, eds., Wittgenstein and Naturalism, Routledge.Google Scholar

Churchland, Paul M. 2005. Cleansing Science. Inquiry 48: 464–77.Google Scholar

Cicero, . [1927]. Tusculan Disputations, translated by King, J. E. (Loeb Classical Library 141). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Code, Lorraine. 1991. What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Conant, James. 1991. Throwing Away the Top of the Ladder. The Yale Review 79: 328–64.Google Scholar

Conant, James.2001. Philosophy and Biography. In Klagge, James C., ed., Wittgenstein, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Conant, James.2002a. On Going the Bloody Hard Way in Philosophy. In Whittaker, John H., ed., The Possibilities of Sense, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Conant, James.2002b. The Method of the Tractatus. In Reck, Erich H., ed., From Frege to Wittgenstein, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Conant, James.2002c. What Ethics in the Tractatus Is Not. In Philipps, D. Z., ed., Wittgenstein on Ethics and Religion, St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Conant, James.2005. The Dialectic of Perspectivism, I. Sats – Nordic Journal of Philosophy 6 (2): 5–50.Google Scholar

Conant, James.2006. The Dialectic of Perspectivism, II. Sats – Nordic Journal of Philosophy 7 (1): 6–57.Google Scholar

Crary, Alice. 2002a. What Do Feminists Want in an Epistemology? In O’Connor, Peg and Scheman, Naomi, eds., Re-Reading the Canon, Penn State Press.Google Scholar

Crary, Alice.2002b. Why Can’t Moral Thought Be Everything It Seems? Philosophical Forum 33: 373–92.Google Scholar

Crary, Alice.2007. Beyond Moral Judgment. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Crary, Alice.2012. Dogs and Concepts. Philosophy 87: 215–37.Google Scholar

Crary, Alice.2016. Inside Ethics: On the Demands of Moral Thought. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Crary, Alice.2018. The Methodological Is Political: What’s the Matter with “Analytic Feminism”? Radical Philosophy 202: 47–60.Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 1987. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter. 2007. Objectivity. Zone Books.Google Scholar

Davidson, Arnold I. 1995. Introduction: Pierre Hadot and the Spiritual Phenomenon of Ancient Philosophy. In Hadot, Pierre, Philosophy as a Way of Life, edited by Davidson, Arnold I., translated by Chase, Michael, Blackwell.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1974. On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47: 5–20.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald.1984/2001. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, second edition. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald.1990. The Structure and Content of Truth. The Journal of Philosophy 87: 297–328.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald.2005. Truth, Language, and History. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

De Mesel, Benjamin. 2017. Wittgenstein and Objectivity in Ethics: A Reply to Brandhorst. Philosophical Investigations 40: 40–63.Google Scholar

DePaul, Michael R. and Ramsey, William (eds.). 1998. Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Diamond, Cora. 1991. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Diamond, Cora.Forthcoming. Ethics: Shifting Perspectives. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2005. Overcoming the Myth of the Mental: How Philosophers Can Profit from the Phenomenology of Everyday Expertise. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 79: 47–65.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2007. Detachment, Involvement and Rationality: Are We Essentially Rational Animals? Human Affairs 17: 101–109.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2013. The Myth of the Pervasiveness of the Mental. In Schear, Joseph K., ed., Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World, Routledge.Google Scholar

Dummett, Michael. 1978. Truth and Other Enigmas. Duckworth.Google Scholar

Dummett, Michael 1993a. Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dummett, Michael.1993b. The Seas of Language. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Earlenbaugh, Joshua and Molyneux, Bernard. 2009. Intuitions Are Inclinations to Believe. Philosophical Studies 145: 89–109.Google Scholar

Eddington, A. S. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry and Lepore, Ernest. 1991. Why Meaning (Probably) Isn’t Conceptual Role. Mind & Language 6: 328–43.Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry and Lepore, Ernest 1992. Holism: A Shopper’s Guide. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. 1879. Begriffsschrift: Eine der artihmetischen nachgebildeten Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. L. Nebert.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob 1884. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. W. Koebner. Cited after the translation in Frege [1997], 84–129.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob 1891. Function und Begriff: Vortrag gehalten in der Sitzung vom 9. Januar 1891 der Jenaischen Gesellschaft für Medicin und Naturwissenschaft. H. Pohle. Cited after the translation “Function and Concept,” in Frege [1997].Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob 1892. Über Begriff und Gegenstand. Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 16: 192–205. Cited after the translation “On Concept and Object,” in Frege [1997].Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob 1918. Der Gedanke – Eine logische Untersuchung. Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1: 58–77. Cited after the translation “Thought,” in Frege [1997].Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob[1997]. The Frege Reader, edited by Beaney, Michael. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. 2007. Introduction: Carnap’s Revolution in Philosophy. In Friedman, Michael and Creath, Richard, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Carnap, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gaita, Raimond. 1998/2000. A Common Humanity: Thinking About Love and Truth and Justice, second edition. Routledge.Google Scholar

Gaita, Raimond.2002. The Philosopher’s Dog. The Text Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Gellner, Ernest. 1959. Words and Things: An Examination of, and an Attack on, Linguistic Philosophy. V. Gollancz.Google Scholar

George, Alexander. 2000. On Washing the Fur without Wetting It: Quine, Carnap, and Analyticity. Mind 109: 1–24.Google Scholar

George, Alexander and Velleman, Daniel J.. 2001. Philosophies of Mathematics. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. 2011. Primitive Normativity and Skepticism about Rules. The Journal of Philosophy 108: 227–54.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann. 1996a. A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann.1996b. Abusing Use. Dialectica 50: 205–23.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann.2003. Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann.2010. Concept: Between the Subjective and the Objective. In Cottingham, John and Hacker, P. M. S., eds., Mind, Method and Morality, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann.2015. Meaning and Rule-Following. In Wright, James D., ed., International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, second edition (volume 14), Elsevier.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann.2017. Philosophy and Philosophical Method. In Glock, Hans-Johann and Hyman, John, eds., A Companion to Wittgenstein, Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann and Preston, John. 1995. Externalism and First-Person Authority. The Monist 78: 515–33.Google Scholar

Goldfarb, Warren. 1983. I Want You to Bring Me a Slab: Remarks on the Opening Sections of the Philosophical Investigations. Synthese 56: 269–72.Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin and Pust, Joel. 1998. Philosophical Theory and Intuitional Evidence. In DePaul, Michael R. and Ramsey, William, eds., Rethinking Intuition, Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, Anthony. 2000. The Dream of Reason: A History of Western Philosophy from the Greeks to the Renaissance. Norton.Google Scholar

Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, Martin. 2006. Quine on Explication and Elimination. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36: 57–70.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, Martin.2011. Eliminativism, Reference and Vocabulary Replacement: Sellarsian Roots of Rortian Pragmatism. In Knowles, Jonathan and Rydenfelt, Henrik, eds., Pragmatism, Science and Naturalism, Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, Martin.2014a. Quine’s Conception of Explication – and Why It Isn’t Carnap’s. In Harman, Gilbert and Lepore, Ernie, eds., A Companion to W. V. O. Quine, Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, Martin.2014b. Review of Wittgenstein’s Metaphilosophy, by Paul Horwich. Mind 123: 1195–201.Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. 1971. Socrates. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 1990. Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 1996. Wittgenstein: Mind and Will. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hadot, Pierre. 1995. The Figure of Socrates. In Hadot, Pierre, Philosophy as a Way of Life, edited by Davidson, Arnold I., translated by Chase, Michael, Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hallett, Garth. 1967. Wittgenstein’s Definition of Meaning as Use. Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Hallett, Garth.1977. A Companion to Wittgenstein’s “Philosophical Investigations.” Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hanfling, Oswald. 2000. Philosophy and Ordinary Language: The Bent and Genius of our Tongue. Routledge.Google Scholar

Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge: Thinking from Women’s Lives. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hartsock, Nancy. 1983. The Feminist Standpoint: Developing Grounds for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism. In Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill, eds., Discovering Reality, D. Reidel.Google Scholar

Hattiangadi, Anandi. 2007. Oughts and Thoughts: Rule-Following and the Normativity of Content. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hertz, Heinrich. 1894. Die Prinzipien der Mechanik: In neuem Zusammenhange dargestellt. J. A. Barth. Cited after the translation The Principles of Mechanics, translated by D. E. Jones and J. T. Walley (Macmillan, 1899).Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jaakko. 1999. The Emperor’s New Intuitions. The Journal of Philosophy 96: 127–47.Google Scholar

Horwich, Paul. 1993. Meaning and Metaphilosophy. Philosophical Issues 4: 152–8.Google Scholar

Horwich, Paul.1998. Meaning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Horwich, Paul.2005. Reflections on Meaning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Horwich, Paul.2008. Explaining Intentionality. Manuscrito 31: 467–82.Google Scholar

Horwich, Paul.2010a. Truth – Meaning – Reality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Horwich, Paul.2010b. Wittgenstein’s Definition of “Meaning” as “Use.” In Whiting, Daniel, ed., The Later Wittgenstein on Language, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Horwich, Paul.2012. Wittgenstein’s Metaphilosophy. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Horwich, Paul.2013. Naturalism, Deflationism and the Relative Priority of Language and Metaphysics. In Price, Huw, ed., Expressivism, Pragmatism, and Representationalism, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horwich, Paul.2014. Naturalism and the Linguistic Turn. In Bashour, Bana and Muller, Hans D., eds., Contemporary Philosophical Naturalism and Its Implications, Routledge.Google Scholar

Hylton, Peter. 2007. Quine. Routledge.Google Scholar

Joël, Karl. 1893. Der echte und der Xenophontische Sokrates. R. Gaertner.Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel. [2003]. Samuel Johnson: Selected Essays, edited by Womersley, David. Penguin.Google Scholar

Johnston, Paul. 1993. Wittgenstein: Rethinking the Inner. Routledge.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1781/7. Kritk der reinen Vernunft. J. F. Hartknoch. Cited after the translation Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W. (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel.1790/3. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Lagarde und Friederich. Cited after the translation Critique of the Power of Judgment, edited by Guyer, Paul, translated bGuyer, y Paul and Matthews, Eric (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Kearns, Stephen and Magidor, Ofra. 2012. Semantic Sovereignty. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85: 322–50.Google Scholar

Klagge, James C. 2010. Das erlösende Wort. In Munz, Volker, Puhl, Klaus, and Wang, Joseph, eds., Language and World, Part Two, Ontos.Google Scholar

Koffka, Kurt. 1921/8. The Growth of the Mind: An Introduction to Child-Psychology, second edition (revised), translated by Ogden, Robert Morris. Harcourt, Brace and Company. Cited after the 2007 edition by Kessinger.Google Scholar

Köhler, Wolfgang. 1929/47. Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology. Liveright.Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul A. 1972/80. Naming and Necessity [slightly revised book edition of “Naming and Necessity,” in Davidson, Donald and Harman, Gilbert, eds., Semantics of Natural Language (D. Reidel, 1972)]. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul A. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kusch, Martin. 2009. Objectivity and Historiography. Isis 100: 127–31.Google Scholar

Kuusela, Oskari. 2008. The Struggle against Dogmatism: Wittgenstein and the Concept of Philosophy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kuusela, Oskari.2014. The Method of Language-Games as a Method of Logic. Philosophical Topics 42: 129–60.Google Scholar

Kuusela, Oskari.2019. Wittgenstein on Logic as the Method of Philosophy: Re-Examining the Roots and Development of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1983. New Work for a Theory of Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 6: 343–77.Google Scholar

Lewis, David.1984. Putnam’s Paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62: 221–36.Google Scholar

Ludlow, Peter. 1997. Introduction [to Part I]. In Ludlow, Peter, ed., Readings in the Philosophy of Language, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Kirk. 2010. Intuitions and Relativity. Philosophical Psychology 23: 427–45.Google Scholar

Lycan, William G. 1999. Philosophy of Language: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Open Court.Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Beacon Press.Google Scholar

McDowell, John. 1979. Virtue and Reason. The Monist 62: 331–50.Google Scholar

McDowell, John.1983. Aesthetic Value, Objectivity, and the Fabric of the World. In Schaper, Eva, ed., Pleasure, Preference and Value, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McDowell, John.1981. Non-Cognitivism and Rule-Following. In Holtzmann, Steven H. and Leich, Christopher M., eds., Wittgenstein, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

McDowell, John.1984. Wittgenstein on Following a Rule. Synthese 58: 325–63.Google Scholar

McDowell, John.1986. Critical Notice [of Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, by Bernard Williams]. Mind 95: 377–86.Google Scholar

McDowell, John.1989. One Strand in the Private Language Argument. Grazer Philosophische Studien 33/4: 285–303.Google Scholar

McDowell, John.1994/6. Mind and World, with a new introduction. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McDowell, John.1998. Mind, Value, and Reality. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McDowell, John.2007. What Myth? Inquiry 50: 338–51.Google Scholar

McDowell, John.2008. Avoiding the Myth of the Given. In Lindgaard, Jakob, ed., John McDowell, Blackwell. Cited after the reprint in McDowell 2009.Google Scholar

McDowell, John.2009. Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McDowell, John.2013a. Concepts in Perceptual Experience: Putnam and Travis. In Baghramian, Maria, ed., Reading Putnam, Routledge.Google Scholar

McDowell, John.2013b. The Myth of the Mind as Detached. In Schear, Joseph K., ed., Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World, Routledge.Google Scholar

McFee, Graham. 1999. Wittgenstein on Art and Aspects. Philosophical Investigations 22: 262–84.Google Scholar

McGinn, Colin. 1984. Wittgenstein on Meaning: An Interpretation and Evaluation. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1945. Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard. Cited after both the 2002 edition of the translation Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Colin Smith (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962) and the translation Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Donald A. Landes (Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

Mills, Charles W. 1988. Alternative Epistemologies. Social Theory and Practice 14: 237–63.Google Scholar

Mills, Charles W. 2005. “Ideal Theory” as Ideology. Hypatia 20: 165–83.Google Scholar

Momigliano, Arnoldo. 1971. The Development of Greek Biography. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Monk, Ray. 1999. Review of Ben Rogers’s A. J. Ayer: A Life. The Sunday Times, June 13, book section.Google Scholar

Morris, Katherine J. 2007. Wittgenstein’s Method: Ridding People of Philosophical Prejudices. In Kahane, Guy, Kanterian, Edward, and Kuusela, Oskari, eds., Wittgenstein and his Interpreters, Blackwell.Google Scholar

Morris, Katherine J. 2017. Wittgenstein and Merleau-Ponty on Gestalt Psychology. In Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine, ed., Wittgenstein and Merleau-Ponty, Routledge.Google Scholar

Mulhall, Stephen. 1990. On Being in the World: Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects. Routledge.Google Scholar

Mulhall, Stephen.2001. Seeing Aspects. In Glock, Hans-Johann, ed., Wittgenstein, Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mulhall, Stephen.2009. The Wounded Animal: J. M. Coetzee and the Difficulty of Reality in Literature and Philosophy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mulhall, Stephen.2010. The Work of Wittgenstein’s Words: A Reply to Baz. In Day, William and Krebs, Victor J., eds., Seeing Wittgenstein Anew, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. 1979. Subjective and Objective. In Nagel, Thomas, Mortal Questions, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas.1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Novaes, Catarina Dutilh and Erich, Reck. 2017. Carnapian Explication, Formalisms as Cognitive Tools, and the Paradox of Adequate Formalization. Synthese 194: 195–215.Google Scholar

Peacocke, Christopher. 2001. Phenomenology and Nonconceptual Content. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 609–15.Google Scholar

Pearson, James. 2017. Caring for Quine’s Don’t-Cares. The Monist 100: 266–87.Google Scholar

Peregrin, Jaroslav. 2014. Inferentialism: Why Rules Matter. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Pichler, Alois. 1991. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Vermischte Bemerkungen: Liste der Manuskriptquellen / Ludwig Wittgenstein, Culture and Value: A List of Source Manuscripts. The Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen.Google Scholar

Plato, . [1961]. The Collected Dialogues of Plato: Including the Letters, edited by Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntingdon. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Porphyry, . [1987]. To Marcella, 31. In Long, Anthony and Sedley, David, eds., The Hellenistic Philosophers, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pust, Joel. 2004. On Explaining Knowledge of Necessity. Dialectica 58: 71–87.Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. 1975. The Meaning of “Meaning.” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7: 131–93.Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary.1977. Realism and Reason. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 50: 483–98.Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary.1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary.1990. Realism with a Human Face, edited by Conant, James. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary.2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Distinction and Other Essays. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. 1950. Methods of Logic. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O 1951. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60: 20–43. Cited after the reprint in Quine 1953/61.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O 1953. Mr. Strawson on Logical Theory. Mind 62: 433–51.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O 1953/61. From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays, second edition, revised. Harvard University Press. Cited after the 1963 edition by Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O 1960. Word and Object. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O 1981. Theories and Things. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Reck, Erich. 2012. Carnapian Explication: A Case Study and Critique. In Wagner, Pierre, ed., Carnap’s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Reddy, Vasudevi. 2008. How Infants Know Minds. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rhees, Rush. 1974. Wittgenstein. The Human World 14 (February).Google Scholar

Richardson, Alan. 2004. Tolerating Semantics: Carnap’s Philosophical Point of View. In Awodey, Steve and Klein, Carsten, eds., Carnap Brought Home, Open Court.Google Scholar

Ricketts, Thomas. 2003. Languages and Calculi. In Hardcastle, Gary L. and Richardson, Alan W., eds., Logical Empiricism in North America, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard.1982. Consequences of Pragmatism. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Rundle, Bede. 1979. Grammar in Philosophy. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Rundle, Bede.1990. Wittgenstein and Contemporary Philosophy of Language. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert. 1945. Philosophical Arguments: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered before the University of Oxford, 30 October 1945. Clarendon Press. Cited after the reprint in Ryle 1971b.Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert.1951. Ludwig Wittgenstein. Analysis 12: 1–9.Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert.1953. Ordinary Language. The Philosophical Review 62: 167–86. Cited after the reprint in Ryle 1971b.Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert.1966. Jane Austen and the Moralists. The Oxford Review 1: 5–18.Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert.1971a. Collected Papers Volume 1: Critical Essays. Hutchinson. Cited after the 2009 edition by Routledge.Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert.1971b. Collected Papers Volume 2: Collected Essays 1929–1968. Hutchinson. Cited after the 2009 edition by Routledge.Google Scholar

von Savigny, Eike. 1983. Zum Begriff der Sprache: Konvention, Bedeutung, Zeichen. Reclam.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Severin. 2006. Wittgenstein: The Way out of the Fly Bottle. Polity.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Severin.2010. A Tale of Two Problems: Wittgenstein’s Discussion of Aspect Perception. In Cottingham, John and Hacker, P. M. S., eds., Mind, Method and Morality, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schulte, Joachim. 1987/93. Experience and Expression: Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Psychology. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sellars, Wilfrid. 1956. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1: 253–329. Cited after the 1997 book edition by Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sellars, Wilfrid.1974. Meaning as Functional Classification (A Perspective on the Relation of Syntax to Semantics). Synthese 27: 417–34.Google Scholar

Sosa, Ernest. 2006. Intuitions and Truth. In Greenough, Partick and Lynch, Michael P., eds., Truth and Realism, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Sosa, Ernest 2007. Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Intuition. Philosophical Studies 132: 99–107.Google Scholar

Sosa, Ernest 2009. A Defense of the Use of Intuitions in Philosophy. In Murphy, Dominic and Bishop, Michael, eds., Stich and His Critics, Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Stein, Howard. 1992. Was Carnap Entirely Wrong, after All? Synthese 93: 275–95.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. 1952. Introduction to Logical Theory. Methuen.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. 1959. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. Methuen.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. 1963. Carnap’s Views on Constructed Systems vs. Natural Languages in Analytic Philosophy. In Schilpp, P. A., ed., The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. 1966. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Methuen.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. 1970. Imagination and Perception. In Foster, Lawrence and Swanson, J. W., eds., Experience and Theory, University of Massachusetts Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Strawson, P. 1992. Analysis and Metaphysics: An Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. 1995. My Philosophy. In Sen, Pranab Kumar and Verma, Roop Rekha, eds., The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson, Allied Publishers.Google Scholar

Stroud, Barry. 2000. Meaning, Understanding, and Practice: Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stroud, Barry.2012. Meaning and Understanding. In Ellis, Jonathan and Guevara, Daniel, eds., Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sunday Grève, Sebastian. 2015. The Importance of Understanding Each Other in Philosophy. Philosophy 90: 213–39.Google Scholar

Sunday Grève, Sebastian 2018. Logic and Philosophy of Logic in Wittgenstein. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96: 168–82.Google Scholar

Sunday Grève, Sebastian and Mácha, Jakub (eds.). 2016. Wittgenstein and the Creativity of Language. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Symons, John. 2008. Intuition and Philosophical Methodology. Axiomathes 18: 67–89.Google Scholar

Tanney, Julia. 2013. Rules, Reasons, and Self-Knowledge. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tanney, Julia.2014. Rule-Following, Intellectualism and Logical Reasoning: On the Importance of a Type-distinction Between Performances and “Propositional Knowledge” of the Norms That Govern Them. In Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle, Munz, Volker, and Coliva, Annalisa, eds., Mind, Language, and Action, De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Tanney, Julia.2019. What Knowledge Is Not: Reflections on Some Uses of the Verb “To Know.” In Valaris, Markos and Hetherington, Stephen, eds., Knowledge in Contemporary Philosophy, Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Tranøy, Knut Erik. 1999. Wittgenstein in Cambridge 1949–1951: Some Personal Recollections. In F. A. Flowers III, ed., Portraits of Wittgenstein, volume 4. Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar

Travis, Charles. 2013. Perception: Essays after Frege. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Travis, Charles.2015. Suffering Intentionally? In Campbell, Michael and O’Sullivan, Michael, eds., Wittgenstein and Perception, Routledge.Google Scholar

Travis, Charles.2016. The Room in a View. In Kemp, Gary and Mras, Gabriele M., eds., Wollheim, Wittgenstein, and Pictorial Representation, Routledge.Google Scholar

Vision, Gerald. 1998. Perceptual Content. Philosophy 73: 395–427.Google Scholar

Wagner, Pierre (ed.). 2012. Carnap’s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Wallgren, Thomas. 2013. Radical Enlightenment Optimism: Socrates and Wittgenstein. In Perissinotto, Luigi and Cámara, Begoña Ramón, eds., Wittgenstein and Plato, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Weinberg, Jonathan M., Nichols, Shaun, and Stich, Stephen. 2001. Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions. Philosophical Topics 29: 429–60.Google Scholar

Whiting, Daniel. 2018. Conceptual Role Semantics. In Fieser, James and Dowden, Bradley, eds., The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, www.iep.utm.edu (last accessed on 15 August 2018).Google Scholar

Wiggins, David. 1987/2002. Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value, third edition. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard. 1978. Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry. Penguin.Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard.1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Fontana Press.Google Scholar

Williamson, Timothy. 2004. Philosophical “Intuitions” and Scepticism about Judgement. Dialectica 58: 109–53.Google Scholar

Williamson, Timothy.2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Winch, Peter. 1981. “Eine Einstellung zur Seele.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81: 1–16.Google Scholar

Wisdom, John. 1945. Gods. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 45: 185–206.Google Scholar

Wisdom, John.1991. Proof and Explanation: The Virginia Lectures, edited by Barker, Stephen F.. University Press of America.Google Scholar

Wollheim, Richard. 1980. Seeing-as, Seeing-in, and Pictorial Representation. In Wollheim, Richard, Art and Its Objects, second edition, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wollheim, Richard.2001. On Pictorial Representation. In van Gerwen, Rob, ed., Richard Wollheim on the Art of Painting, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wright, Crispin. 1980. Wittgenstein on the Foundations of Mathematics. Duckworth.Google Scholar

von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1982. Wittgenstein. Blackwell.Google Scholar

von Wright, Georg Henrik.1989. Autobiography. In Schilpp, P. A. and Hahn, Lewis Edwin, eds., The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright, Open Court.Google Scholar

Zerilli, Linda M. G. 2016. A Democratic Theory of Judgment. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar