Figures
2.1The development of the PIE aspectual system according to Hoffmann and Strunk
2.2The development of the PIE aspectual system according to Kuryłowicz
4.1Theoretical models for the evolution of PIE reduplication as a perfectivity marker
4.3The evolution of reduplicated and unreduplicated aorist and present stems
5.1The development of the classical Greek active pluperfect (3sg. and 1sg.)
5.2Semantic evolution of the PIE perfect with nactostatic primacy
5.3Semantic evolution of the PIE perfect without nactostatic primacy
5.4‘Perfecto-presents’ in the evolution of the PIE perfect (after Fig. 5.2)
5.5‘Perfecto-presents’ in the evolution of the PIE perfect (revised)
5.6A relative chronology of ‘nominal verbs’ and *CoC-éi̯e/o- verbs
5.7Formal relationships between PIE thematic presents, ‘nominal verbs’, and ‘statives’
5.8A relative chronology of *CC-éi̯e/o- and *CoC-éi̯e/o- verbs
6.2The development of aorists to *CeRH- roots: two scenarios
6.3Systemic relationships between reduplicated, thematic, and root aorists
7.1A model of the injunctive as a functionally recessive type
8.1Systemic relationships between reduplicated, thematic, root, and s-aorists
9.4Ergative → accusative alignment change and the animacy hierarchy
9.7Antipassive case marking and (Pre-)PIE ergative → accusative alignment change
10.1A model for the early evolution of the m-conjugation third-person endings
