Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:58:11.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Animal Cognition in Aristotle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2021

Sophia M. Connell
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access

Summary

Aristotle wrote extensively about the character and behavior of non-human animals in his Historia Animalium. One aspect of character is cognitive abilities. The chapter sets out Aristotle’s views on the cognitive abilities of animals, evidenced also in other works such as the Metaphysics and De Anima. All animals perceive but many also have imagination, memory, and practical intelligence. For Aristotle nonhuman animals have a sort of practical intelligence suited to their particular ways of life. The considerable overlap in cognitive abilities between human and nonhuman animals allows Aristotle to establish a biological basis for many human traits. Many nonhuman animals not only manage to organize their lives and negotiate new challenges but also maintain relationships with each other over extended periods. Social relationships require complex communication and involve a very important type of intelligence which is perfected in the most political of animals, human beings. The chapter ends with an account of how human cognition differs from that which occurs in other animals.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Guide to Further Reading

Sorabji, R. 1993. Animal Minds and Human Morals (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), Chapters 1–7.Google Scholar
Coles, A. 1997. “Animal and Childhood Cognition in Aristotle’s Biology and the Scala Naturae,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse (Stuttgart: Steiner), 287324.Google Scholar
Glock, H.-J. 2019. “Aristotle on the Anthropological Difference and Animals Minds,” in Keil, G. and Kreft, N. (eds.), Aristotle’s Anthropology (Cambridge University Press), 140160.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2013. “Aristotle on Natural Sociability, Skills and Intelligence in Animals,” in Harte, V. and Lane, M. (eds.), Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), 277293.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1983a. Science, Folklore and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Osbourne [Rowett], C. 2007. Dumb Beasts and Dead Philosophers: Humanity and the Humane in Ancient Philosophy and Literature (Oxford University Press), chapter 4.Google Scholar
Labarrière, J. L. 1990. “De la Phronesis Animale,” in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, Logique et Metaphysique chez Aristote (Paris: l’Editions de Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), 405428.Google Scholar
Balme, D. 1991. “Introduction,” in Aristotle: History of Animals. Books 7–10 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. 1971. “Aristotle: Animals, Emotion and Moral Virtue,” Arethusa 4(2): 137165.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1999a. “Aristotle on the Biological Roots of Virtue: The Natural History of Natural Virtue,” in Maienschein, J. and Ruse, M. (eds.), Biology and the Foundations of Ethics (Cambridge University Press), 1031. [Reprinted in D. Henry and K. M. Nielsen (eds.), 2015. Bridging the Gap Between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics (Cambridge University Press), 193–213]Google Scholar
Connell, S. 2019. “Mothering and Intelligence in Aristotle’s Biology and Ethics,” in Sfendoni-Mentzou, D. (ed.), Proceedings of Aristotle World Congress, Aristotle 2400 Years, May 23–28, 2016 (Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Press), 122127.Google Scholar
Depew, D. 1995. “Humans and Other Political Animals in Aristotle’s History of Animals,” Phronesis 40(2): 156181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrin, P. 2015. “Is Politics a Natural Science?” in Lockwood, T. and Samaris, T. (eds.), Aristotle’s Politics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 2745.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×