Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pkds5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-16T11:17:13.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

Anna Anguissola
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi, Pisa
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbe, M. B. 2015. ‘Polychromy’, in Friedland, Grunow Sobocinski, and Gazda 2015: 173–88.Google Scholar
Abbondanza, L. 2001. ‘Immagini della phantasia. I quadri di Filostrato maior tra pittura e scultura’, Römische Mitteilungen 108: 111–34.Google Scholar
Adam, J.-P. and Varène, P. 1980. ‘Une peinture romaine représentant une scène de chantier’, Revue Archéologique: 212–38.Google Scholar
Adam, S. 1966. The Technique of Greek Sculpture in the Archaic and Classical Periods. London: Thames & Hudson (British School of Archaeology at Athens, suppl. vol. 3).Google Scholar
Addison, J. 1705. Remarks on Several Parts of Italy in the Years 1701, 1702, 1703. London: J. TonsonGoogle Scholar
Albizzati, C. 1916. ‘Two Ivory Fragments of a Statue of Athena’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 36: 373402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amelung, W. 1903–8. Die Sculpturen des Vaticanischen Museums, 2 vols. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. 1974. ‘Die römischen Repliken der mythologischen Skulpturengruppen von Sperlonga’, in Conticello, B. and Andreae, B., Die Skulpturen von Sperlonga. Antike Plastik 14: 63110.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. 1982. Odysseus. Archäologie des europäischen Menschenbildes. Frankfurt am Main: Societäts-Verlag.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. 1983. ‘Le sculture’, in Zevi, F. (ed.), Baia. Il ninfeo imperiale sommerso di Punta Epitaffio. Benevento: Banca Sannitica, 4966.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. 1987. Plinius und der Laokoon. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. 1991. ‘Il ninfeo di Punta dell’Epitaffio a Baia’, in Stucchi, S. and Bonanno Aravantinos, M. (eds), Giornate di studio in onore di Achille Adriani. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider, 237–65.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. 1992. ‘Die römischen Kopien in Marmor nach griechischen Meisterwerken in Bronze als Ausdruck der römischen Kultur’, Studi italiani di filologia classica, 3rd series, 10: 2131.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. 1994. Praetorium Speluncae. Tiberius und Ovid in Sperlonga. Mainz am Rhein and Stuttgart: Akademie der Wissenschaften und Literatur and Steiner (= Praetorium Speluncae. L’antro di Tiberio a Sperlonga ed Ovidio. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, 1995).Google Scholar
Andreae, B. (ed.) 1995. Bildkatalog der Skulpturen des Vatikanischen Museums. I. Museo Chiaramonti, vol. II. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. 1996. Der Farnesische Stier. Schicksale eines Meisterwerkes der pergamenischen Bildhauer Apollonios und Tauriskos von Tralleis. Freiburg im Breisgau: Rombach.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. 1999. Odysseus. Mythos und Erinnerung. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. 2001. Skulptur des Hellenismus. Munich: Hirmer.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. 2003. ‘Il gruppo di Scilla di Sperlonga ricomposto’, in Fiorentini, G., Caltabiano, M. and Calderone, A. (eds), Archeologia del Mediterraneo. Studi in onore di Ernesto de Miro. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider, 5160.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. and Conticello, B. 1987. Skylla und Charybdis. Zur Skylla-Gruppe von Sperlonga. Mainz am Rhein and Stuttgart: Akademie der Wissenschaften und Literatur and Steiner.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. and Parisi Presicce, C. (eds) 1996. Ulisse. Il mito e la memoria. Catalogue of the exhibition. Rome: Progetti Museali Editore.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. 2005. ‘Roman Copies of Myron’s Discobolus’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 18: 317–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anguissola, A. 2012. ‘Difficillima imitatio’. Immagine e lessico delle copie tra Grecia e Roma. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. 2013. ‘Marks of Imitation or Signs of Originality? An Approach to Structural Supports in Roman Marble Statuary’, in Bokern, A., Bolder-Boos, M., Krmnicek, S., Maschek, D. and Page, S. (eds), TRAC 2012. Proceedings of the XXII Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 120.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. 2014a. ‘Remembering with Greek Masterpieces: Observations on Memory and Roman Copies’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memoria Romana. Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 117–34.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. 2014b. ‘The Prestige of Copies. Greek Originals and the Roman Art of Imitation’, in Backes, B. and von Nicolai, C. (eds), Kulturelle Kohärenz durch Prestige. Munich: Utz, 133–66.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. 2015. ‘Idealplastik and the Relationship between Greek and Roman Sculpture’, in Friedland, Grunow Sobocinski, and Gazda 2015: 240–59.Google Scholar
Antonelli, F., Pollini, J. and Cancelliere, S. 2017. ‘A Short Note on the Archaeometric Study of Two Sculptures in the Gabinetto Segreto of Naples National Archeological Museum. The Pan and the She-Goat Group and the Bikini Venus’, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 9/4: 685–91.10.1007/s12520-016-0358-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonsson, O. 1937. The Praxiteles Marble Group in Olympia. Stockholm: Victor Pettersons Bokindustri.Google Scholar
Arata, F. P. 2005. Opere d’arte dal mare. Testimonianze archeologiche subacquee del trasporto e del commercio marittimo di prodotti artistici. Rome: Libreria dello Stato, Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato.Google Scholar
Arnold, D. 1969. Die Polykletnachfolge. Berlin: De Gruyter (= Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Ergänzungsheft, 25).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, C. 1987. Giambologna. The Complete Sculpture. Oxford: Phaidon and Christie’s.Google Scholar
Avery, V. 2015. ‘Alessandro Vittoria and the Art of Carving’, in Helmstutler Di Dio 2015: 87110.Google Scholar
Azoulay, V. 2014. Les Tyrannicides d’Athènes: Vie et mort de deux statues. Paris: Editions du Seuil.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacchi, A. and Tumidei, S. 1998. Bernini. La scultura in San Pietro. Milan: Federico Motta.Google Scholar
Baker, M. 2000. Figured in Marble. The Making and Viewing of Eighteenth-Century Sculpture. London: V&A.Google Scholar
Bang, M. 1921. ‘Preise von Statuen’, in Friedlaender, L. (ed.), Darstellungen aus der Sittengeschichte Roms in der Zeit von August bis zum Ausgang der Antonine, vol. IV. Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 312–25.Google Scholar
Banham, M. (ed.) 1995. The Cambridge Guide to Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barbanera, M. 2006. Original und Kopie. Bedeutungs- und Wertewandel eines intellektuellen Begriffspaares seit dem 18. Jahrhundert in der Klassischen Archäologie. Stendal: Winckelmann-Gesellschaft (= Originale e copia nell’arte antica. Mantua: Tre Lune, 2011)Google Scholar
Barbanera, M. 2008. ‘Original und Kopie. Aufstieg und Niedergang eines intellektuellen Begriffspaares seit dem 18. Jahrhundert in der Klassischen Archäologie’, in Junker, K. and Stähli, A. (eds), Original und Kopie. Formen und Konzepte der Nachahmung in der antiken Kunst. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 3561.Google Scholar
Barker, S. 2016. ‘Calculating the Manpower for the Marble Decor of the Villa’, in Gazda, E. K. and Clarke, J. R. (eds), Leisure and Luxury in the Age of Nero. The Villas of Oplontis near Pompeii. Catalogue of the exhibition. Ann Arbor, MI: Kelsey Museum of Archaeology, 133–5.Google Scholar
Barocchi, P. 1960–2. Trattati d’arte del Cinquecento. Fra manierismo e controriforma. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Barocchi, P. 1982. Il Bacco di Michelangelo / Michelangelo’s Bacchus. Florence: SPES.Google Scholar
Bartman, E. 1988. ‘Décor et Duplicatio: Pendants in Roman Sculptural Display’, American Journal of Archaeology 92: 211–25.10.2307/505630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartman, E. 1992. Ancient Sculptural Copies in Miniature. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004450899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartman, E. 2003. ‘Piecing as Paragone. Carlo Albacini’s Diana at Ince’, in Burnett Grossman, J., Podany, J. and True, M. (eds), History of Restoration of Ancient Stone Sculpture. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum, 115–26.Google Scholar
Basile, J. 1993. ‘The Capestrano Warrior and Related Monuments of the Seventh to Fifth Centuries bc’, Revue des Archéologues et Historiens d’Art de Louvain 26: 931.Google Scholar
Bassett, J. 2008. The Craftsman Revealed. Adriaen de Vries Sculptor in Bronze. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. 1980. A Catalogue of the Lamps in the British Museum, vol. II, Roman Lamps Made in Italy. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Beaven, L. 2004. ‘Bernini’s Last Papal Portrait. The Bust of Pope Clement X Altieri and its Audience’, in Marshall, D. R. (ed.), ‘The Italians’ in Australia. Studies in Renaissance and Baroque Art. Florence: Centro Di, 95106.Google Scholar
Becatti, G. 1937. ‘Le tre Grazie’, Bullettino della Commissione Archeologica Municipale di Roma 65: 4160.Google Scholar
Becatti, G. 1956. ‘Letture pliniane. Le opere d’arte nei Monumenta Asini Pollionis e negli Horti Serviliani’, in Studi in onore di Aristide Calderini e Roberto Paribeni, vol. III, Studi di Archeologia e di Storia dell’Arte Antica. Milan: Casa Editrice Ceschina, 199210.Google Scholar
Beck, H., Bol, P. C. and Bückling, M. (eds) 1990. Polyklet. Der Bildhauer der griechischen Klassik. Catalogue of the exhibition. Frankfurt am Main: Liebieghaus.Google Scholar
Beck, H. and Bol, P. C. (eds) 1993. Polykletforschungen. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
Belli Pasqua, R. 1995. Sculture di età romana in ‘basalto’. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. K. 1994. ‘The Washington Bronze Dionysos’, unpublished MA thesis. University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Benson, J. L. 1959. ‘Spirally Fluted Columns in Greece’, Hesperia 28: 253–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergemann, J. 1990. Römische Reiterstatuen. Ehrendenkmäler im öffentlichen Bereich. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Berger, E. (ed.) 1990. Antike Kunstwerke aus der Sammlung Ludwig. III. Skulpturen. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Berger, E. (ed.) 1992. Der Entwurf des Künstlers. Bildhauerkanon in der Antike und Neuzeit. Catalogue of the exhibition. Basel: Antikenmuseum und Sammlung Ludwig.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. 1999. Chiragan, Aphrodisias, Konstantinopel. Zur mythologischen Skulptur der Spätantike. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Bertoletti, M. 2006. ‘The Engine Room. The Monumental Center’, in Bertoletti, M., Cima, M. and Talamo, E. (eds), Centrale Montemartini. Musei Capitolini. Milan: Electa, 4273.Google Scholar
Bieber, M. 1961. The Sculpture of the Hellenistic Age. 2nd edn. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieber, M. 1977. Ancient Copies. Contributions to the History of Greek and Roman Art. Albany, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bildwerke des Altertums in Abgüssen aus dem Albertinum zu Dresden. 1953. Dresden: Staatliche Kunstsammlungen.Google Scholar
Blinkenberg, C. 1933. Knidia. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Praxitelischen Aphrodite. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Blümel, C. 1927. Griechische Bildhauerarbeit. Berlin: De Gruyter 1927 (=Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Ergänzungsheft, 11).Google Scholar
Blume, C. 2012. ‘The Role of the Stone in the Polychrome Treatment of Hellenistic Sculptures’, in Gutiérrez Garcia-Moreno, A., Mercadal, P. Lapuente and de Llanza, I. Rodà (eds), Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone. Proceedings of the IX Association for the Study of Marbles and Other Stones in Antiquity (ASMOSIA) Conference. Tarragona: Institut Català d’Arqueologia Clàssica, 754–62.Google Scholar
Blume, C. 2014. ‘Bright Pink, Blue and Other Preferences. Polychrome Hellenistic Sculpture’, in Østergaard, J. S. and Nielsen, A. M. (eds), Transformations. Classical Sculpture in Colour. Catalogue of the exhibition. Copenhagen: Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, 166–89.Google Scholar
Blume, C. 2015. Polychromie Hellenistischer Skulptur. Ausführung, Instandhaltung und Botschaften, 2 vols. Tübingen: Imhof.Google Scholar
Boardman, J. 1995. Greek Sculpture. The Late Classical Period. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Bol, P. C. 1972. Die Skulpturen des Schiffsfundes von Antikythera. Berlin: Gebr. Mann (Athenische Mitteilungen. Beiheft, 2).Google Scholar
Bol, R. 1984. Das Statuenprogramm des Herodes-Atticus-Nymphäums. Berlin: De Gruyter (Deutsches Archäologisches Institut. Olympische Forschungen, vol. XV).Google Scholar
Bol, R. 1998. Amazones Volneratae. Untersuchungen zu den Ephesischen Amazonenstatuen. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Bol, R. 2004. ‘Die ephesischen Amazonenstatuen’, in Bol, P. C. (ed.), Die Geschichte der antiken Bildhauerkunst, vol. II, Klassische Plastik. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern, 145–58.Google Scholar
Bonfante, L. and Carter, C. 1987. ‘An Absent Herakles and a Hesperid: A Late Antique Marble Group in New York’, American Journal of Archaeology 91: 247–57.10.2307/505219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordenache, G. 1964. ‘Contributi per una storia dei culti e dell’arte nella Tomi d’età romana’, Studii Clasice 6: 155–78.Google Scholar
Boschung, D. 1989. Die Bildnisse des Caligula. Berlin: Gebr. Mann (=Das römische Herrscherbild, vol. IV).Google Scholar
Bourgeois, B. 2003. ‘Secure for Eternity. Assembly Techniques for Large Statuary in the Sixteenth to Nineteenth Century’, in Grossman, J. Burnett, Podany, J. and True, M. (eds), History of Restoration of Ancient Stone Sculpture. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum, 149–62.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, B., Jockey, P. and Karydas, A. 2011. ‘New Researches on Polychrome Hellenistic Sculptures in Delos, III: The Gilding Processes. Observations and Meanings’, in Jockey, P. (ed.), Leukos lithos. Marbres et autres roches de la Méditerranée antique: études interdisciplinaires. Interdisciplinary Studies on Mediterranean Ancient Marble and Stones. Actes du VIIIe Colloque international de l’Association for the Study of Marble and Other Stones used in Antiquity (ASMOSIA). Aix-en-Provence: Karthala, 645–61.Google Scholar
Bouyia, P. 2012. ‘Maritime Commerce and Luxury in the Age of Cicero. The Evidence of the Antikythera Shipwreck’, in Kaltsas, Vlachoianni, and Bouyia 2012: 287–92.Google Scholar
Bradley, M. 2009. ‘The Importance of Colour on Ancient Marble Sculpture’, Art History 32.3: 427–57.10.1111/j.1467-8365.2009.00666.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braemer, F. 1990. ‘Les relations commerciales et culturelles de Carthage avec 1’Orient romain à partir de documents sculptés’, in Histoire et Archéologie de l’Afrique du Nord. Actes du IVe colloque international, vol. I, Carthage et son territoire dans l’antiquité. Paris: Edition du CTHS, 175–98.Google Scholar
Braun, E. 1850. ‘L’Apoxyomenos di Lisippo’, Annali dell’Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica 22: 223–51.Google Scholar
Bravi, A. 2012. ‘Ornamenta urbis’. Opere d’arte greche negli spazi romani. Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, V. 2003. Die Polychromie der archaischen und frühklassischen Skulptur. Munich: Biering & Brinkmann (Studien zur antiken Malerei und Farbgebung, vol. V).Google Scholar
Brinkmann, V., Koch-Brinkmann, U. and Piening, H. 2011. ‘Alte Gewänder in neuem Look. Beobachtungen zu den Farben der pompejanischen Artemis’, in Kunze, M. (ed.), Die Artemis von Pompeji und die Entdeckung der Farbigkeit griechischer Plastik. Ruhpolding: Franz Philipp Rutzen, 6985.Google Scholar
Brinkerhoff, D. M. 1970. A Collection of Sculpture in Classical and Early Christian Antioch. Albany, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Broccoli, U. 1982. Terracina. Museo e Raccolte Civiche, vol. I, Materiali di provenienza nota. Rome: Bardi (Cataloghi dei musei locali e delle collezioni del Lazio, vol. IV).Google Scholar
Brüggemann, N. 2007. ‘Kontexte und Funktionen von Kouroi im archaischen Griechenland’, in Meyer, M. and Brüggemann, N., Kore und Kouros. Weihgaben für die Götter. Vienna: Phoibos, 91226.Google Scholar
Brunnsåker, S. 1955. The Tyrant-Slayers of Kritios and Nesiotes. Lund: Håkan Ohlssons Boktryckeri.Google Scholar
Bruno, M., Attanasio, D. and Prochaska, W. 2015. ‘The Docimium Marble Sculptures of the Grotto of Tiberius at Sperlonga’, American Journal of Archaeology 119: 375–94.10.3764/aja.119.3.0375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, M., Lazzarini, L., Pensabene, P., Soligo, M. and Turi, B. 2002. ‘Provenance Studies of the White Marble Blocks and Architectural Elements from Porto and their Contributions to the History of the Marble Trade’, in Herrmann, J. J. Jr., Herz, N. and Newman, R. (eds), Asmosia V. Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Association for the Study of Marbles and Other Stones in Antiquity. London: Archetype, 347–58.Google Scholar
Brunn, H. 1905. ‘Der Hermes des Praxiteles’, in Kleine Schriften, vol. II. Leipzig: Teubner, 379–98.Google Scholar
Budde, L. and Nicholls, R. V. 1964. A Catalogue of the Greek and Roman Sculpture in the Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bulard, M. 1906. ‘Aphrodite, Pan et Éros. Groupe en marbre’, Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 30: 610–31.10.3406/bch.1906.3290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burford, A. 1969. The Greek Temple Builders at Epidauros. A Social and Economic Study of Building in the Asklepian Sanctuary, during the Fourth and Early Third Centuries bc. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Burnett Grossman, J. 2003. Looking at Greek and Roman Sculpture in Stone. A Guide to Terms, Styles, and Techniques. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Bussagli, M. 1959. ‘Buddha’, in EAA, vol. II, 215–22.Google Scholar
Bussels, S. 2012. The Animated Image. Roman Theory on Naturalism, Vividness and Divine Power. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1524/9783050062617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, H.-U. 2009. Aurea Aetas. Die Blütezeit des Leipziger Antikenmuseums zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts. Leipzig: Antikenmuseum der Universität.Google Scholar
Cancellieri, F. 1806. Dissertazioni epistolari di G. B. Visconti e Filippo Waquier de la Barthe sopra la statua del Discobolo scoperta nella Villa Palombara. Rome: Antonio Fulgoni.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. 1931. ‘Who Carved the Hermes of Praxiteles?’, American Journal of Archaeology 35: 249–61.10.2307/498563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carradori, F. 1802. Istruzione elementare per gli studiosi della scultura. Florence: Tipografia della Società Letteraria (Elementary instructions for Students of Sculpture, tr. M. Kalevi Auvinen. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum, 2002).Google Scholar
Carroll, D. 1987. Paraesthetics: Foucault, Lyotard, Derrida. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Caskey, L. D. 1925. Catalogue of the Greek and Roman Sculpture, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cassieri, N. 2000. Sperlonga. La Grotta di Tiberio e il Museo Archeologico Nazionale. Rome: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato.Google Scholar
Cassieri, N. 2013. Formia. Museo Archeologico Nazionale e monumenti. Rome: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato.Google Scholar
Casson, S. 1931. ‘The Hermes of Praxiteles’, American Journal of Archaeology 35: 262–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catoni, M. L. 2005. Schemata. Comunicazione non verbale nella Grecia antica. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale.Google Scholar
Catoni, M. L. 2008. La comunicazione non verbale nella Grecia antica. Gli schemata nella danza, nell’arte, nella vita. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Chamay, J. and Maier, J.-L. 1990. Sculptures en pierre du Musée de Genève, vol. I, Art Grec. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Cianfarani, V. 1968. ‘Note sul restauro del guerriero di Capestrano’, Rivista dell’Istituto Nazionale di Archeologia e Storia dell’Arte 15: 519.Google Scholar
Claridge, A. 1988. ‘Roman Statuary and the Supply of Statuary Marble’, in Fant, J. C. (ed.), Ancient Marble Quarrying and Trade. Oxford: BAR, 139–52.Google Scholar
Claridge, A. 1990. ‘Ancient Techniques of Making Joins in Marble Statuary’, in True, M. and Podany, J. (eds), Marble. Art Historical and Scientific Perspectives on Ancient Sculpture. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum, 135–62.Google Scholar
Claridge, A. 2015. ‘Marble Carving, Techniques, Workshops, and Artisans’, in Friedland, Grunow Sobocinski, and Gazda 2015: 107–22.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 2005–8. Eleusis. The Inscriptions on Stone. Documents of the Sanctuary of the two Goddesses and Public Documents of the Deme, 2 vols. Athens: Archaeological Society at Athens.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1973. ‘Sperlonga e Tiberio’, Dialoghi di Archeologia 7: 97122.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1983. ‘Il commercio delle opere d’arte in età tardo-repubblicana’, Dialoghi di Archeologia, 3rd series, 1: 4553.Google Scholar
Cole, M. 2007. ‘Bernini Struts’, in Sofaer, J. (ed.), Material Identitites. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 5566.10.1002/9780470694091.ch3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coliva, A. 1998. ‘Apollo e Dafne’, in Coliva, A. and Schütze, S. (eds), Bernini scultore. La nascita del Barocco in Casa Borghese. Rome: De Luca, 252–75.Google Scholar
Coliva, A. (ed.) 2002. Bernini scultore. La tecnica esecutiva. Rome: De Luca.Google Scholar
Comstock, M. B. and Vermeule, C. C. 1976. Sculpture in Stone. The Greek, Roman and Etruscan Collection of the Museum of Fine Arts Boston. Boston: Museum of Fine Arts.Google Scholar
Conticello, B. 1974. ‘I gruppi scultorei di soggetto mitologico a Sperlonga’, in Conticello, B. and Andreae, B., Die Skulpturen von Sperlonga. Antike Plastik 14: 760.Google Scholar
Conticello, B. 1996. ‘Il gruppo di Scilla e della nave’, in Andreae, B. and Parisi Presicce, C. (eds), Ulisse. Il mito e la memoria. Rome: Progetti Museali Editore, 280315.Google Scholar
Conticello, B., Franchi dall’Orto, L. and Varone, A. (eds) 1990. Rediscovering Pompeii. Catalogue of the exhibition. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Conze, A. 1911–22. Die attischen Grabreliefs, vol. IV. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Corso, A. 1996. ‘The Hermes of Praxiteles’, Numismatica e Antichità Classiche. Quaderni Ticinesi 25: 131–53.Google Scholar
Corso, A. 2004. The Art of Praxiteles, vol. I, The Development of Praxiteles’ Workshop and its Cultural Tradition until the Sculptor’s Acme. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Corso, A. 2007. The Art of Praxiteles, vol. II, The Mature Years. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Corso, A. 2010. The Art of Praxiteles, vol. III, The Advanced Maturity of the Sculptor. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Corso, A. 2013. The Art of Praxiteles, vol. IV, The Last Phase of his Activity. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Costabile, F. 1995. ‘Le statue frontonali del Tempio Marasà a Locri Epizefiri’, Römische Mitteilungen 102: 962.Google Scholar
Daehner, J. 2005. ‘Grenzen der Nacktheit. Studien zum männlichen Körper in der griechischen Plastik des 5. und 4. Jahrhunderts v. Chr.’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 120: 155300.Google Scholar
Daehner, J. and Lapatin, K. (eds) 2015. Power and Pathos. Bronze Sculpture of the Hellenistic World. Catalogue of the exhibition. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Trust.Google Scholar
De Angelis D’Ossat, M. (ed.) 2002. Scultura antica in Palazzo Altemps. Milan: Electa.Google Scholar
De Angelis D’Ossat, M. and Capodiferro, A. (eds) 2011. Palazzo Altemps. Le collezioni. Milan: Electa.Google Scholar
de Chaisemartin, N. and Örgen, E. 1983. ‘Les sculptures de Silahtaraga’, Revue Archéologique: 181–9.Google Scholar
de Chaisemartin, N. and Örgen, E. 1984. Les Documents sculptés de Silahtarağa. Paris: Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations.Google Scholar
De Luca, G. 1975. ‘Der Satyr im Palazzo Corsini/Rom. Eine Replik der Gruppe Aufforderung zum Tanz’, Antike Plastik 15: 7381.Google Scholar
De Luca Savelli, M. 1981. ‘Le opere del Mochi’, in De Luca Savelli, M. (ed.), Francesco Mochi 1580–1654. Florence: Centro Di.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1987. The Truth in Painting, tr. G. Bennington and I. McLeod. Chicago: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226807690.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickins, G. 1912. Catalogue of the Acropolis Museum, vol. I, Archaic Sculpture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Di Pasquale, G. 2004. Tecnologia e meccanica. Trasmissione dei saperi tecnici dall’età ellenistica al mondo romano. Florence: Leo S. Olschki.Google Scholar
Dohrn, T. 1968. ‘Die Marmor-Standbilder des Daochos Weihgeschenks in Delphi’, Antike Plastik 8: 3353.Google Scholar
Dombrowski, D. 1997. Giuliano Finelli: Bildhauer zwischen Neapel und Rom. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dugas, C. 1924. Le sanctuaire d’Aléa Athéna a Tégée au IVe siècle. Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, R. 1962. ‘Costs, Outlays and Summae Honorariae from Roman Africa’, Papers of the British School at Rome 30: 47115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan-Jones, R. 1965. ‘An Epigraphic Survey of Costs in Roman Italy’, Papers of the British School at Rome 33: 189306.10.1017/S0068246200007388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan-Jones, R. 1982. The Economy of the Roman Empire. Quantitative Studies. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duro, P. (ed.) 1996. The Rhetoric of the Frame. Essays on the Boundaries of the Artwork. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eaverly, M. A. 1995. Archaic Greek Equestrian Sculpture. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1995. Art and the Roman Viewer. The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2013. ‘The Lycurgus Cup’, in Entwistle, C. and James, L. (eds), New Light on Old Glass: Recent Research on Byzantine Mosaics and Glass. London: British Museum, 10311.Google Scholar
Fant, J. C. 2008. ‘Quarrying and Stoneworking’, in Oleson, J. P. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 121–35.Google Scholar
Fant, J. C. and Barker, S. 2016. ‘The Cost of Luxury. Procurement and Labor for the Marble Decor of Villa A’, in Gazda, E. K. and Clarke, J. R. (eds), Leisure and Luxury in the Age of Nero. The Villas of Oplontis near Pompeii. Catalogue of the exhibition. Ann Arbor, MI: Kelsey Museum of Archaeology, 126–32.Google Scholar
Favero, M. 2008. Francesco Mochi. Una carriera di scultore. Trento: UNI Service.Google Scholar
Fendt, A. 2012. Archäologie und Restaurierung. Die Skulpturenergänzungen in der Berliner Antikensammlung des 19. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110238853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuser, S. 2013. Monopodia. Figürliche Tischfüsse aus Kleinasien. Istanbul: Yayınları.Google Scholar
Filges, A. 1999. ‘Marmorstatuetten aus Kleinasien. Zur Ikonographie, Funktion und Produktion antoninischer, severischer und späterer Idealplastik’, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 49: 377430.Google Scholar
Fittschen, K. 1977. Katalog der antiken Skulpturen in Schloss Erbach. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
Fittschen, K. and Zanker, P. 1985. Katalog der römischen Porträts in den Capitolinischen Museen und den anderen kommunalen Sammlungen der Stadt Rom, vol. I, Kaiser- und Prinzenbildnisse. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Foerster, G. 2005. ‘A Modest Aphrodite from Bet Shean’, Israel Museum Studies in Archeology 4: 321.Google Scholar
Foley, K. 2016. ‘Puppets in Traditional Asian Theatre’, in Liu, S. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Asian Theatre. London: Routledge, 177201.Google Scholar
Friedland, E. A. 2003a. ‘Art as Cultural Artifact. Roman Sculpture in the Semitic East’, in Clark, D. R. and Matthews, V. H. (eds), One Hundred Years of American Archaeology in the Middle East. Proceedings of the American Schools of Oriental Research Centennial Celebration, Washington, DC, April 2000. Boston: American Schools of Oriental Research, 331–44.Google Scholar
Friedland, E. A. 2003b. ‘The Roman Marble Sculptures from the North Hall of the East Baths at Gerasa’, American Journal of Archaeology 107: 413–48.10.3764/aja.107.3.413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, E. A. 2012. The Roman Marble Sculptures from the Sanctuary of Pan at Caesarea Philippi/Panias (Israel). Boston: American Schools of Oriental Research.Google Scholar
Friedland, E. A., Grunow Sobocinski, M. and Gazda, E. K. (eds) 2015. The Oxford Handbook of Roman Sculpture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199921829.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fröhlich, B. 1998. Die statuarischen Darstellungen der hellenistischen Herrscher. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač.Google Scholar
Fullerton, M. D. 1990. The Archaistic Style in Roman Statuary. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004329065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, D. 1992–3. ‘Originali greci e copie romane secondo Giovanni Battista ed Ennio Quirino Visconti’, Labyrinthos 21–4: 215–51.Google Scholar
García y Bellido, A. 1949. Esculturas romanas de España y Portugal. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Gasparri, C. 1994. ‘Copie e copisti’, in EAA, 2nd supplement, vol. II, 267–80.Google Scholar
Gasparri, C. (ed.) 2009. Le sculture Farnese, vol. I, Le sculture ideali. Naples: Electa.Google Scholar
Gasparri, C. (ed.) 2010. Le sculture Farnese, vol. III, Le sculture delle Terme di Caracalla. Rilievi e varia. Naples: Electa.Google Scholar
Gazda, E. K. 1981. ‘A Marble Group of Ganymede and the Eagle from the Age of Augustine’, in Humphrey, J. H. (ed.), Excavations at Carthage 1977 Conducted by the University of Michigan, vol. VI. Ann Arbor, MI: Kelsey Museum of Archaeology, 125–81.Google Scholar
Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency. An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geominy, W. 1998. ‘Zum Daochos-Weihgeschenk’, Klio 80: 369402.10.1524/klio.1998.80.2.369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geominy, W. 1999a. ‘Zur Komposition der Gruppe Die Aufforderung zum Tanz’, in Gedenkschrift für Andreas Linfert. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern, 140–55.Google Scholar
Geominy, W. 1999b. ‘Zwischen Kennerschaft und Cliché. Römische Kopien und die Geschichte ihrer Bewertung’, in Vogt-Spira, G. and Rommel, B. (eds), Rezeption und Identität. Die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europäisches Paradigma. Stuttgart: Steiner, 3858.Google Scholar
Geominy, W. 2007. ‘The Daochos Monument at Delphi: The Style and Setting of a Family Portrait in Historic Dress’, in Schultz, P. and von den Hoff, R. (eds), Early Hellenistic Portraiture. Image, Style, Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 8498.Google Scholar
Gercke, P. 1968. Satyrn des Praxiteles, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
Gercke, P. (ed.) 1991. Apollon und Athena. Klassische Götterstatuen in Abgüssen und Rekonstruktionen. Catalogue of the exhibition. Kassel: Staatliche Kunstsammlungen.Google Scholar
Gercke, P. and Zimmermann-Elseify, N. 2007. Antike Skulpturen und neuzeitliche Nachbildungen in Kassel. Bestandkatalog. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Germini, B. 2008. Statuen des strengen Stils in Rom. Verwendung und Wertung eines griechischen Stils im römischen Kontext. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Gerstein, A. (ed.) 2007. Display and Displacement. Sculpture and the Pedestal from Renaissance to Post-Modern. London: Courtauld Institute of Art.Google Scholar
Giuliani, L. 2013a. Image and Myth. A History of Pictorial Narration in Greek Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (tr. of Bild und Mythos: Geschichte der Bilderzählung in der griechischen Kunst. Munich: Beck, 2003).10.7208/chicago/9780226025902.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuliani, L. 2013b. ‘Kästchen oder Quader? Zur Sitzstatue des Lorenzo de’ Medici in der Sagrestia Nuova und zum Problem der Materialität in den Skulpturen Michelangelos’, Mitteilungen des Kunsthistorischen Institutes in Florenz 55: 335–57.Google Scholar
Giuliani, L. 2016. ‘Michelangelos Quader. Ein Nachtrag’, Mitteilungen des Kunsthistorischen Institutes in Florenz 58: 109–16.Google Scholar
Giuliani, L. and Catoni, M. L. 2016. ‘Myron und die Kunst des Diskuswerfens’, Römische Mitteilungen 122: 1343.Google Scholar
Giuliano, A. (ed.) 1979. Museo Nazionale Romano. Le Sculture, vol. I.1. Rome: De Luca.Google Scholar
Giuliano, A. (ed.) 1992. La collezione Boncompagni Ludovisi. Algardi, Bernini e la fortuna dell’antico. Venice: Marsilio.Google Scholar
Giuliano, A. (ed.) 1995. Museo Nazionale Romano. Le Sculture, vol. I.12, Magazzini. Sculture greche del V secolo/Parte I. Rome: De Luca.Google Scholar
Goldberg, E. L. 1996. ‘Artistic Relations between the Medici and the Spanish Courts 1587–1621. Part II’, The Burlington Magazine 138.1121: 529–40.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. 1960. Art and Illusion. A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. London and New York: Phaidon and Pantheon.Google Scholar
Grassinger, D. 1999. Die mythologischen Sarkophage, vol. I. Berlin: Gebr. Mann (Die antiken Sarkophagreliefs, vol. XII.1).Google Scholar
Grüßinger, R., Kästner, V. and Scholl, A. (eds) 2011. Pergamon. Panorama der antiken Metropole. Berlin and Petersburg: Staatliche Museen zu Berlin and Imhof.Google Scholar
Guattani, G. A. 1784. Monumenti antichi inediti ovvero Notizie sulle antichità e belle arti di Roma per l’anno MDCCLXXXIV. Rome: Pagliarini.Google Scholar
Habetzeder, J. 2012. ‘The Impact of Restoration: The Example of the Dancing Satyr in the Uffizi’, Opuscula. Annual of the Swedish Institutes at Athens and Rome 5: 133–63.10.30549/opathrom-05-07CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner, G. 1961. Geschichte der Griechischen Kunst. Zurich: Atlantis.Google Scholar
Hallett, C. H. 2005. ‘Emulation versus Replication. Redefining Roman Copying’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 18: 419–35.Google Scholar
Hampe, R. 1972. Sperlonga und Virgil. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Hannestad, N. 1989. Review of: B. Andreae and B. Conticello, Skylla und Charybdis (Mainz am Rhein, 1987). Gnomon 61: 655–7.Google Scholar
Hannestad, N. 1994. Tradition in Late Antique Sculpture. Conservation – Modernization – Production. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Hannestad, N. 2007. ‘Late Antique Mythological Sculpture. In Search of a Chronology’, in Bauer, F. A. and Witschel, C. (eds), Statuen in der Spätantike. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 273305.Google Scholar
Harder, A. 2012. Callimachus, Aetia. Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hardiman, C. 2012Popular Aesthetics and Personal Art Appreciation in the Hellenistic Age’, in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M. (eds), Aesthetic Value in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, 265–83.Google Scholar
Harvey, I. E. 1989. ‘Derrida, Kant, and the Performance of Parergonality’, in Silverman, H. J. (ed.), Derrida and Deconstruction. New York: Routledge, 5774.Google Scholar
Haskell, F. and Penny, N. 1981. Taste and the Antique. The Lure of Classical Sculpture 1500–1900. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, F. 1906. ‘Athlet oder Apollon?Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Archäologischen Institutes 9: 279–87.Google Scholar
Havelock, C. M. 1995. The Aphrodite of Knidos and her Successors. A Historical Review of the Female Nude in Greek Art. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.14837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellenkemper Salies, G. 1994. Das Wrack. Der antike Schiffsfund von Mahdia, 2 vols. Cologne: Rheinland.Google Scholar
Helmstutler Di Dio, K. (ed.) 2015. Making and Moving Sculpture in Early Modern Italy. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Helmstutler Di Dio, K. 2015. ‘Shipping Sculpture, Shaping Diplomacy. Gifts of Sculpture for Spain’, in Helmstutler Di Dio 2015: 166–90.Google Scholar
Hemingway, S., Milleker, E. J. and Stone, R. 2002. ‘The Early Imperial Bronze Statue of a Boy in the Metropolitan Museum of Art: A Technical and Stylistic Analysis’, in Giumlia-Mair, A. (ed.), I bronzi antichi. Produzione e tecnologia. Montagnac: Monique Mergoil, 200–7.Google Scholar
Hermann Fiore, K. 1997. ‘Apollo e Dafne del Bernini al tempo del Cardinale Scipione Borghese’, in Hermann Fiore, K. (ed.), Apollo e Dafne del Bernini nella Galleria Borghese. Cinisello Balsamo: Silvana Editoriale, 71109.Google Scholar
Hessler, C. J. 2014. Zum Paragone. Malerei, Skulptur und Dichtung in der Rangstreitkultur des Quattrocento. Berlin: Akademie Verlag and De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, J. 1997. Piscinae. Artificial Fishponds in Roman Italy. Chapel Hill, NC, and London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hiller, S. 1976. ‘Statuenstützen im fünften Jahrhundert v. Chr’, Antike Kunst 19: 3040.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. 1995. Sperlonga. Die homerischen Gruppen und ihre Bildquellen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Hirst, M. 1985. ‘Michelangelo, Carrara, and the Marble for the Cardinal’s Pietà’, Burlington Magazine 127.984: 152–6, 159.Google Scholar
Hofter, M. R. 2011. ‘Von Dübeln und Löchern – Antike Anstückungstechniken an pergamenischen Skulpturen’, in Grüßinger, R., Kästner, V. and Scholl, A. (eds), Pergamon. Panorama der antiken Metropole. Berlin and Petersburg: Staatliche Museen zu Berlin and Imhof, 334–7.Google Scholar
Holland, L. A. 1956. ‘The Purpose of the Warrior Image from Capestrano’, American Journal of Archaeology 60: 243–7.10.2307/500151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollinshead, M. B. 1998. ‘Hair Struts in Late Roman Sculpture’, in Hartswick, K. J. and Sturgeon, M. C. (eds), ΣΤΕΦΑΝΟΣ. Studies in Honor of Brunilde Sismondo Ridgway. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania and University Museum, 119–30.Google Scholar
Hollinshead, M. B. 2002a. ‘Extending the Reach of Marble: Struts in Greek and Roman Sculpture’, in Gazda, E. K. (ed.), The Ancient Art of Emulation. Studies in Artistic Originality and Tradition from the Present to Classical Antiquity. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 117–52.Google Scholar
Hollinshead, M. B. 2002b. ‘From Two to Three Dimensions in Unfinished Roman Sculpture’, in Herrmann, J. J. Jr., Herz, N. and Newman, R. (eds), Asmosia V. Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Association for the Study of Marbles and Other Stones in Antiquity. London: Archetype, 225–30.Google Scholar
Hollinshead, M. B. 2015. ‘Awaiting Identity: Copenhagen’s Diskophoros and its Auxiliary Support’, in Pensabene, P. and Gasparini, E. (eds), Asmosia X. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference of ASMOSIA. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider, 171–7.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 1974. ‘Die Nike der Messenier und Naupaktier in Olympia’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 89: 70111.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 2004. The Language of Images in Roman Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, R. 1998. Picture, Image and Experience. A Philosophical Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, R. 2003. ‘Sculpture and Space’, in Kieran, M. and Lopes, D. M. (eds), Imagination, Philosophy and the Arts. London: Routledge, 274–92.Google Scholar
Hughes, F. 2010. Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgement. A Reader’s Guide. London and New York: Continuum.10.5040/9781350252875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwit, J. M. 1989. ‘The Kritios Boy: Discovery, Reconstruction, and Date’, American Journal of Archaeology 93: 4180.10.2307/505398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huskinson, J. 2015. Roman Strigillated Sarcophagi. Art and Social History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199203246.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, C. A. 1914–16. ‘The Greek Inscriptions at Petworth House’, Annual of the British School at Athens 21: 155–65.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, L., Scranton, R. and Brill, R. 1976. Kenchreai Eastern Port of Corinth, vol. II, The Panels of Opus Sectile in Glass. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004674769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inan, J. 1973. ‘Roman Copies of Some Famous Greek Statues from Side’, Antike Plastik 12: 6979.Google Scholar
Inan, J. 1975. Roman Sculpture in Side. Ankara: Türk tarih kurumu basımevi.Google Scholar
Inan, J. 1993. ‘Der sandalenbindende Hermes’, Antike Plastik 22: 105–16.Google Scholar
Inan, J. and Rosenbaum, E. 1966. Roman and Early Byzantine Portrait Sculpture in Asia Minor. London: Oxford University Press for the British Academy.Google Scholar
Inan, J. and Alföldi-Rosenbaum, E. 1979. Römische und frühbyzantinische Porträtplastik aus der Türkei. Neue Funde. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Irvin, S. 2013. ‘Sculpture’, in Gaut, B. and Lopes, D. M. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. 3rd edn. London: Routledge, 606–15.Google Scholar
Isager, J. 1991. Pliny on Art and Society. The Elder Pliny’s Chapters on the History of Art. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Israel, J. 2013. ‘Zum Grabmal von Kallithea – Kleinasiatische Bautraditionen im Spätklassischen Athen’, in Sporn, K. (ed.), Griechische Grabbezirke klassischer Zeit. Normen und Regionalismen. Munich: Hirmer, 5568.Google Scholar
Jacquemin, A. and Laroche, D. 2001. ‘Le monument de Daochos, ou le trésor des Thessaliens’, Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 125: 305–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jockey, P. 1999. ‘La technique composite à Delos à l’Époque hellénistique’, in Archéomatériaux. Marbres et autres roches. ASMOSIA 4. Bordeaux: Université Michel de Montaigne, 305–16.Google Scholar
Johansen, F. 1994. Catalogue. Roman Portraits I. Copenhagen: Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek.Google Scholar
Jones, E. 2015. ‘The Sculptural Stones of Venice: The Selection, Supply, and Cost of Marble and Stone in the Sixteenth Century’, in Helmstutler Di Dio 2015: 111–36.Google Scholar
Kaltsas, N. 2002. Sculpture in the National Archaeological Museum, Athens. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Kaltsas, N. (ed.) 2004. Agon. Catalogue of the exhibition. Athens: Hellenic Ministry of Culture.Google Scholar
Kaltsas, N., Vlachogianni, E. and Bouyia, P. (eds) 2012. The Antikythera Shipwreck. The Ship, the Treasures, the Mechanism. Catalogue of the exhibition. Athens: National Archaeological Museum.Google Scholar
Kalveram, K. 1995. Die Antikensammlung des Kardinals Scipione Borghese. Worms am Rhein: Wernersche Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Kane, S. and Carrier, S. C. 1988. ‘Relationships between Style and Size of Statuary and the Availability of Marble at Cyrene’, in Herz, N. and Waelkens, M. (eds), Classical Marble. Geochemistry, Technology, Trade. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 197206.10.1007/978-94-015-7795-3_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, S. and Carrier, S. C. 1992. ‘Relationships between Style and Size of Statuary and the Availability of Marble in the Eastern Roman Empire’, in Waelkens, M., Herz, N. and Moens, L. (eds), Ancient Stones. Quarrying, Trade and Provenance. Interdisciplinary Studies on Stones and Stone Technology in Europe and Near East from the Prehistoric to the Early Christian Period. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 121–7.Google Scholar
Kane, S., Polikreti, K., Maniatis, Y., Herz, N. and Carrier, S. C. 1999. ‘Investigation of the Pentelic Marble Sculptures of the Nymphaeum of Herodes Atticus in Olympia, Greece’, in Archéomatériaux. Marbres et autres roches. ASMOSIA 4. Bordeaux: Université Michel de Montaigne, 317–23.Google Scholar
Kane Trimble, S. 1976–7. ‘Sculpture Appendix’, Libya Antiqua 13–14: 313–30.Google Scholar
Kansteiner, S. 2013. Review of: H. Weinstock, Statuenstützen an vorkaiserzeitlichen Marmorstatuen (Hamburg, 2012). Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft 16: 1047–51.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 2000. Critique of Judgement, ed. Guyer, P., tr. P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karanastassis, P. 1987. ‘Untersuchungen zur kaiserzeitlichen Plastik in Griechenland. II: Kopien, Varianten und Umbildungen nach Athena-Typen des 5. Jhs. v. Chr.’, Athenische Mitteilungen 102: 323428.Google Scholar
Kauth, C. 2010. Der sogenannte Protesilaos. Zwei Repliken in New York und London, unpublished MA thesis, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, E. 1978. ‘The Cleveland Marbles’, in Atti del IX congresso internazionale di archeologia cristiana, vol. I, I monumenti cristiani precostantiniani. Vatican City: Pontificio Istituto di Archeologia Cristiana, 653–75.Google Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, C. 1969. Les maîtres du marbre. Carrare, 1300–1600. Paris: SEVPEN.Google Scholar
Klatt, U. 1995. ‘Römische Klapptische. Drei- und vierbeinige Stützgestelle aus Bronze und Silber’, Kölner Jahrbuch 28: 349573.Google Scholar
Knittlmayer, B. and Heilmeyer, W.-D. (eds) 1998. Die Antikensammlung. Altes Museum. Pergamonmuseum. Mainz am Rhein: von Zabern.Google Scholar
Knoll, K. (ed.) 1994. Das Albertinum vor 100 Jahren – die Skulpturensammlung Georg Treus. Catalogue of the exhibition. Dresden: Staatliche Kunstsammlungen.Google Scholar
Knoll, K., Vorster, C. and Woelk, M. (eds) 2011. Skulpturensammlung Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden. Katalog der antiken Bildwerke. II. Idealskulptur der römischen Kaiserzeit, 2 vols. Munich: Hirmer.Google Scholar
Koçak, M. 2013. Aphrodite am Pfeiler. Studien zu aufgestützten/angelehnten weiblichen Figuren der griechischen Marmorplastik. Istanbul: Yayınları.Google Scholar
Koch, G. and Sichtermann, H. 1982. Römische Sarkophage. Munich: Beck (Handbuch der Archäologie).Google Scholar
Koortbojian, M. 2002. ‘Forms of Attention: Four Notes on Replication and Variation’, in Gazda, E. K. (ed.), The Ancient Art of Emulation. Studies in Artistic Originality and Tradition from the Present to Classical Antiquity. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 173204.Google Scholar
Körner, H. 2010. ‘Statuenstützen im Werk Jean-Antoine Houdons’, in Bückling, M and Scherf, G. (eds), Jean-Antoine Houdon. Die Sinnliche Skulptur. Catalogue of the exhibition. Frankfurt: Liebieghaus, 259–77.Google Scholar
Körner, H. and Möseneder, K. (2008). Format und Rahmen. Vom Mittelalter bis zur Neuzeit. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Kommer, B. R. (ed.) 2000. Adriaen de Vries 1556–1626. Augsburgs Glanz – Europas Ruhm. Augsburg: Städtische Kunstsammlungen.Google Scholar
Kousser, R. M. 2008. Hellenistic and Roman Ideal Sculpture. The Allure of the Classical. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107298262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranz, P. 1989. ‘Die Asklepiosstatue im Schlosspark von Klein-Glienicke. Ein neuer Typus und sein kulturgeschichtlicher Hintergrund’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 104: 107–55.Google Scholar
Kreeb, M. 1988. Untersuchungen zur figürlichen Ausstattung delischer Privathäuser. Chicago: Ares.Google Scholar
Kreikenbom, D. 1990. Bildwerke nach Polyklet. Kopienkritische Untersuchungen zu den männlichen statuarischen Typen nach polykletischen Vorbildern. Diskophoros, Hermes, Doryphoros, Herakles, Diadumenos. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
Kreikenbom, D. 2013. ‘Originale und Kopien. Signaturen an späthellenistischen und kaiserzeitlichen Skulpturen’, in Hegener, N. and Horsthemke, F. (eds), Künstlersignaturen von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Petersberg: Imhof, 6073.Google Scholar
Krinzinger, F. (ed.) 2010. Hanghaus 2 in Ephesos. Die Wohneinheiten 1 und 2. Baubefund, Ausstattung, Funde. Textband Wohneinheit 1. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Kunze, C. 1996. ‘Zur Datierung des Laokoon und der Skyllagruppe aus Sperlonga’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 111: 139223.Google Scholar
Kunze, C. 1998. Der Farnesische Stier und die Dirkegruppe des Apollonios und Tauriskos. Berlin: De Gruyter (=Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Ergänzungsheft, 30).Google Scholar
Kunze, C. 2002. Zum Greifen nah. Stilphänomene in der hellenistischen Skulptur und ihre inhaltliche Interpretation. Munich: Biering & Brinkmann.Google Scholar
Lahusen, G. 1999. ‘Antenore, Plinio e la statuaria romana’, in Formigli, E. (ed.), I grandi bronzi antichi. Le fonderie e le tecniche di lavorazione dall’età arcaica al Rinascimento. Siena: Nuova Immagine Editrice, 3541.Google Scholar
Lahusen, G. and Formigli, E. 2001. Römische Bildnisse aus Bronze. Kunst und Technik. Munich: Hirmer.Google Scholar
Lankheit, K. 1962. Florentinische Barockplastik. Die Kunst am Hofe der letzten Medici, 1670–1743. Munich: Bruckmann.Google Scholar
Landwehr, C. 1982. Griechische Meisterwerke in römischen Abgüssen. Der Fund von Baia. Zur Technik antiker Kopisten. Frankfurt am Main: Liebieghaus.Google Scholar
Landwehr, C. 1985. Die Antiken Gipsabgüsse aus Baiae: griechische Bronzestatuen in Abgüssen römischer Zeit. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
Landwehr, C. 1993. Die Römischen Skulpturen von Caesarea Mauretaniae, vol. I, Idealplastik. Weibliche Figuren benannt. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Landwehr, C. 2000. Die Römischen Skulpturen von Caesarea Mauretaniae, vol. II, Idealplastik. Männliche Figuren. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Landwehr, C. 2006. Die Römischen Skulpturen von Caesarea Mauretaniae, vol. III, Idealplastik. Bacchus und Gefolge – Masken – Fabelwesen – Tiere – Bukranien – Nicht benennbare Figuren. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Landwehr, C. 2010. ‘The Baiae Casts and the Uniqueness of Roman Copies’, in Frederiksen, R. and Marchand, E. (ed.), Plaster Casts: Making, Collecting and Displaying from Classical Antiquity to the Present. Berlin: De Gruyter, 3546.10.1515/9783110216875.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langl, J. 1887. Griechische Götter und Heldengestalten nach antiken Bildwerken. Vienna: Alfred Hölder K.K. Hof- und Universitäts-Buchhändler.Google Scholar
Langlotz, E. 1947. Phidiasprobleme. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Langlotz, E. 1971. ‘Zur Deutung des sogenannten Protesilaos in New York’, Archäologischer Anzeiger: 427–42.Google Scholar
Lapatin, K. and Wight, K. (eds) 2010. The J. Paul Getty Museum. Handbook of the Antiquities Collection. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E. 1985. Amazzonomachia. Le sculture frontonali del tempio di Apollo Sosiano. Rome: De Luca.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E. 1987. L’Auriga dell’Esquilino. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E. 1998. ‘Artisti rodii negli horti romani’, in Cima, M. and La Rocca, E. (eds), Horti romani. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider, 203–74.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E. and Parisi Presicce, C. (eds) 2010. Musei Capitolini. Le sculture del Palazzo Nuovo, vol. I. Milan: Electa.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E. and Parisi Presicce, C. with Lo Monaco, A. (eds) 2012. L’età dell’equilibrio, 98–180 d.C. Traiano, Adriano, Antonino Pio, Marco Aurelio. Catalogue of the exhibition. Rome: Mondo Mostre.Google Scholar
Lauter, H. 1967. ‘Eine seitenverkehrte Kopie des Apoxyomenos’, Bonner Jahrbücher des Rheinischen Landesmuseums 167: 119–28.Google Scholar
Lauter, H. 1969. ‘Zur Datierung der Skulpturen von Sperlonga’, Römische Mitteilungen 76: 162–73.Google Scholar
Lavin, I. 1998. ‘Ex Uno Lapide: The Renaissance Sculptor’s Tour de Force’, in Winner, M., Andreae, B. and Pietrangeli, C. (eds), Il cortile delle statue. Der Statuenhof des Belvedere im Vatikan. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern, 191210.Google Scholar
Lavin, I. 2012. Bernini at Saint Peter’s. The Pilgrimage. London: Tindar Press.Google Scholar
Layton, R. H. 2005. ‘Structure and Agency in Art’, in Coquet, M., Derlon, B. and Jeudy-Ballini, M. (eds), Les cultures à l’œuvre. Rencontres en art. Paris: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, 2946.Google Scholar
Lechat, H. 1903. Au Musée de l’Acropole d’Athènes. Études sur la sculpture en Attique avant la ruine de l’Acropole lors de l’invasion de Xerxès. Lyon and Paris: A. Roy and Libraire A. Fontemoing.Google Scholar
León, P. 2008. ‘Nueva replica de la Amazona Sciarra’, in La Rocca, E., León, P. and Parisi Presicce, C. (eds), Le due patrie acquisite. Studi di archeologia dedicati a Walter Trillmich. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider, 243–53.Google Scholar
Lierke, R. 2013. ‘On the Manufacture of Diatreta and Cage Cups from the Pharos Beaker to the Lycurgus Cup’, in Entwistle, C. and James, L. (eds), New Light on Old Glass: Recent Research on Byzantine Mosaics and Glass. London: British Museum, 89102.Google Scholar
Linfert, A. 1979. Review of: J. Inan, Roman Sculpture in Side (Ankara, 1975). Bonner Jahrbücher des Rheinischen Landesmuseums 179: 780–5.Google Scholar
Linfert, A. 1993. ‘Aus Anlaß neuer Repliken des Westmacottschen Epheben und des Dresdner Knaben’, in Beck and Bol 1993: 141–92.Google Scholar
Lippold, G. 1923. Kopien und Umbildungen Griechischer Statuen. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Lippold, G. 1936. Die Skulpturen des Vatikanischen Museums, vol. III.1. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lippold, G. 1956. Die Skulpturen des Vatikanischen Museums, vol. III.2. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Liverani, P. 1988–9. ‘L’Antiquarium di Villa Barberini a Castel Gandolfo’, Rendiconti della Pontificia Accademia Romana di Archeologia 61: 102–30.Google Scholar
Liverani, P. 1989. L’antiquarium di Villa Barberini a Castel Gandolfo. Vatican City: Tipografia Poliglotta Vaticana (Monumenti Musei e Gallerie Pontificie).Google Scholar
Liverani, P. 1993. ‘Il Doriforo del Braccio Nuovo e l’Efebo tipo Westmacott di Castel Gandolfo. Nota sul restauro e sul contesto’, in Beck and Bol 1993: 117–40.Google Scholar
Liverani, P. 2003. ‘Der Augustus von Prima Porta’, in Brinkmann, V. and Wünsche, R. (eds), Bunte Götter. Die Farbigkeit antiker Skulptur. Munich: Staatliche Antikensammlungen und Glyptothek, 187–91 (= 2004. ‘L’Augusto di Prima Porta’, in Liverani, P. (ed.), I colori del bianco. Policromia nella scultura antica. Rome: De Luca, 235–42).Google Scholar
Liverani, P. 2006. ‘Il Laocoonte in età antica’, in Buranelli, F., Liverani, P. and Nesselrath, A. (eds), Laocoonte. Alle origini dei Musei Vaticani. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider, 2340.Google Scholar
Locchi, A. 2006. ‘Vestire gli dèi, vestirsi per gli dèi (nella Grecia antica)’, in Rivarli, M., Álvarez Sosa, M. and Locchi, A. (eds), Contesti antichi. Rome: Edizioni Nuova Cultura, 77100.Google Scholar
Lopes, D. M. 2005. Sight and Sensibility. Evaluating Pictures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löwy, E. 1885. Inschriften griechischer Bildhauer. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Löwy, E. 1905. ‘Athlet oder Apollon?’, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Archäologischen Institutes 8: 269–76.Google Scholar
Ma, J. 2013. Statues and Cities. Honorific Portraits and Civic Identity in the Hellenistic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maderna-Lauter, C. 2002. ‘Spätarchaische Plastik’, in Bol, P. C. (ed.), Die Geschichte der antiken Bildhauerkunst, vol. I, Frühgriechische Plastik. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern, 223–69.Google Scholar
Maffei, P. A. 1704. Raccolta di Statue antiche e moderne. Rome: Stamperia alla Pace.Google Scholar
Maffei, S. 1999. ‘La fama di Laocoonte nei testi del Cinquecento’, in Settis, S. (ed.), Laocoonte. Fama e stile. Rome: Donzelli, 85230.Google Scholar
Mägele, S., Richard, J. and Waelkens, M. 2007. ‘A Late-Hadrianic Nymphaeum at Sagalassos (Pisidia, Turkey). A Preliminary Report’, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 57: 469504.Google Scholar
Manderscheid, H. 1981. Die Skulpturenausstattung der Kaiserzeitlichen Thermenanlagen. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
Mansuelli, G. A. 1958–61. Galleria degli Uffizi: le sculture, 2 vols. Rome: Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato.Google Scholar
Marcadé, J. 1969. Au Musée de Délos. Étude sur la sculpture hellénistique en ronde bosse découverte dans l’ile. Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Marcadé, J. (ed.) 1996. Sculptures Déliennes. Athens and Paris: École Française d’Athènes and De Boccard 1996.Google Scholar
Marquardt, N. 1995. Pan in der Hellenistischen und Kaiserzeitlichen Plastik. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Martinez, J.-L. 2007a. ‘L’Apollon Sauroctone’, in Pasquier and Martinez 2007: 202–15.Google Scholar
Martinez, J.-L. 2007b. ‘Les Satyres de Praxitèle’, in Pasquier and Martinez 2007: 236–59.Google Scholar
Marvin, M. 2008. The Language of the Muses: The Dialogue between Greek and Roman Sculpture. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Matravers, D. 2013. ‘Wollheim’, in Gaut, B. and Lopes, D. M. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. 3rd edn. London: Routledge, 200–9.Google Scholar
Mattusch, C. C. (ed.) 1996. The Fire of Hephaistos. Large Classical Bronzes from North American Collections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Art Museums.Google Scholar
Maviglia, A. 1913. ‘Gli attributi dei sostegni nella statuaria antica’, Römische Mitteilungen 28: 191.Google Scholar
McCann, A. M. 1978. Roman Sarcophagi in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
McCloskey, M. A. 1987. Kant’s Aesthetics. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendel, G. 1912–14. Musées Impériaux Ottomans. Catalogue des Sculptures grecques, romaines et byzantines, 3 vols. Istanbul: Imperial Museum.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, L. 1982. Paragoni. Benedetto Varchi’s ‘Due Lezzioni’ and Cinquecento Art Theory. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press.Google Scholar
Merker, G. 1973. The Hellenistic Sculpture of Rhodes. Gothenburg: Åström.Google Scholar
Michalowski, C. 1932. Exploration archéologique de Délos, vol. XIII, Les portraits hellénistiques et romains. Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Michaelis, A. 1882. Ancient Marbles in Great Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michaelis, A. 1901. Strassburger Antiken. Festgabe für die Archäologische Sektion der XLVI. Versammlung Deutscher Philologen und Schulmänner dargeboten von dem Kunstarchäologischen Institut der Kaiser-Wilhelms-Universität Strassburg. Strasbourg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Miniero, P. and Zevi, F. (eds) 2008. Museo Archeologico dei Campi Flegrei. Catalogo generale. Liternum, Baia, Miseno. Naples: Electa.Google Scholar
Molloy, M. E. 1996. Libanius and the Dancers. Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann.Google Scholar
Moltesen, M. (ed.) 2002. Catalogue. Imperial Rome II. Statues. Copenhagen: Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek.Google Scholar
Moltesen, M. (ed.) 2005. Catalogue. Imperial Rome III. Copenhagen: Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek.Google Scholar
Montagu, J. 1985. ‘Bernini Sculptures Not by Bernini’, in Lavin, I. (ed.), Bernini: New Aspects of his Art and Thought. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2343.Google Scholar
Montagu, J. 1989. Roman Baroque Sculpture. The Industry of Art. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Moormann, E. M. 1988. La pittura parietale romana come fonte di conoscenza per la scultura antica. Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Moreno, P. 1994. Scultura ellenistica, 2 vols. Rome: Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato.Google Scholar
Moreno, P. (ed.) 1995. Lisippo. L’arte e la fortuna. Catalogue of the exhibition. Rome: Fabbri.Google Scholar
Moser von Filseck, K. 1988. Der Apoxyomenos des Lysipp und das Phänomen von Zeit und Raum in der Plastik des 5. und 4. Jhs.v.Chr. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Mueller, M. 2016. Objects as Actors. Props and the Poetics of Performance in Greek Tragedy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Müller, H. W. 1975. ‘Zwei Darstellungen des Ganymed aus Ägypten’, in Wandlungen. Studien zur antiken und neueren Kunst. Ernst Homann-Wiedeking gewidmet. Munich: Stiftland-Verlag Waldsassen-Bayern, 235–42.Google Scholar
Murray, A. S. 1885. ‘A Terra-Cotta Diadumenos’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 6: 243–7.10.2307/623399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustilli, D. 1939. Il Museo Mussolini. Rome: Libreria dello Stato.Google Scholar
Muth, S. 2007. ‘Das Manko der Statuen? Zum Wettstreit der bildlichen Ausstattung im spätantiken Wohnraum’, in Bauer, F. A. and Witschel, C. (eds), Statuen in der Spätantike. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 341–55.Google Scholar
Muthmann, F. 1927. Hadrianische und Antoninische Statuenstützen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der römischen Kopistentätigkeit. Freiburg im Breisgau: Freiburger Studentendruckerei.Google Scholar
Muthmann, F. 1931. ‘Fragmente einer Wiederholung des Satyrs mit der Fussklapper’, Athenische Mitteilungen 56: 87–9.Google Scholar
Muthmann, F. 1951. Statuenstützen und dekoratives Beiwerk an griechischen und römischen Bildwerken. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der römischen Kopistentätigkeit. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Neudecker, R. 1988. Die Skulpturen-Ausstattung römischer Villen in Italien. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. 2005. Greek Athletics in the Roman World: Victory and Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199279302.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, A. M. and Østergaard, J. S. 1997. Catalogue. The Eastern Mediterranean in the Hellenistic Period. Copenhagen: Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek.Google Scholar
Niemeier, W.-D. 2002. Der Kouros vom Heiligen Tor. Überraschende Neufunde archaischer Skulptur im Kerameikos in Athen. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Nolte, S. 2006. Steinbruch, Werkstatt, Skulptur. Untersuchungen zu Aufbau und Organisation griechischer Bildhauerwerkstätten. Göttingen: Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Østergaard, J. S. (ed.) 1996. Catalogue. Imperial Rome. Copenhagen: Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek.Google Scholar
Østergaard, J. S. 2008. ‘Emerging Color: Roman Sculptural Polychromy Revived’, in Panzanelli, R., Schmidt, E. D. and Lapatin, K. (eds), The Color of Life: Polychromy in Sculpture from Antiquity to the Present. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum, 4061.Google Scholar
Østergaard, J. S. 2010. ‘The Sciarra Amazon Investigation: Some Archaeological Comments’, in Østergaard, J. S. (ed.), Tracking Colour. The Polychromy of Greek and Roman Sculpture in the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Preliminary Report, vol. II. Copenhagen: Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, 5660 (available for download at www.trackingcolour.com).Google Scholar
Østergaard, J. S. 2015. ‘Identical Roman Copies? Diversification through Color’, in Settis, S., Anguissola, A. and Gasparotto, D. (eds), Serial/Portable Classic. Milan: Fondazione Prada, 113–17.Google Scholar
Østergaard, J. S., Sargent, M. L. and Therkildsen, R. H. 2014. ‘The Polychromy of Roman “Ideal” Marble Sculpture of the 2nd Century ce’, in Liverani, P. and Santamaria, U. (eds), Diversamente bianco: La policromia della scultura romana. Rome: Quasar, 5169.Google Scholar
Özgen, E. and Özgen, İ. (eds) 1988. Antalya Museum. Ankara: Ministry of Culture.Google Scholar
Özgüt, M. E. 1996. Skulpturen des Museums von Antalya, vol. I, Ausflug in die Mythologie und Geschichte. Antalya: Museum.Google Scholar
Padgett, M. (ed.) 2001. Roman Sculpture in the Princeton Art Museum. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pafumi, S. 2007. ‘Per la ricostruzione degli arredi scultorei del Palazzo dei Cesari sul Palatino’, BABESCH. Annual Papers in Mediterranean Archaeology 82: 207–25.Google Scholar
Papangelē, K. 2002. Eleusina. Ho archaiologikos chōros kai to museio. Athens: EFG Eurobank Ergasias.Google Scholar
Papini, M. 2008. L’Apollo di Mantova. Rome: Palombi.Google Scholar
Papini, M. 2010. ‘Giunone Cesi’, in La Rocca, E., Parisi Presicce, C. and Lo Monaco, A. (eds), I giorni di Roma. L’età della conquista. Catalogue of the exhibition. Milan: Skira, 159–60 no. I.18.Google Scholar
Papini, M. 2015. ‘Republican Rome and Italic Art’, in Borg, B. E. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Art. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, 95113.Google Scholar
Paribeni, E. 1959. Catalogo delle sculture di Cirene. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider (Monografie di Archeologia Libica, vol. V).Google Scholar
Parker, G. 2014. ‘Mobile Monumentality. The Case of Obelisks’, in Osborne, J. F. (ed.), Approaching Monumentality in Archaeology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 273–87.Google Scholar
Pasquier, A. 2007a. ‘Praxitèle aujourd’hui? La question des originaux’, in Pasquier and Martinez 2007: 82105.Google Scholar
Pasquier, A. 2007b. ‘Les Aphrodites de Praxitèle’, in Pasquier and Martinez 2007: 130–51.Google Scholar
Pasquier, A. and Martinez, J.-L. (eds) 2007. Praxitèle. Catalogue of the exhibition. Paris: Musée du Louvre.Google Scholar
Penny, N. 1993. The Materials of Sculpture. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pensabene, P. 1994. Le vie del marmo. I blocchi di cava di Roma e di Ostia. Il fenomeno del marmo nella Roma antica. Rome: Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali, Soprintendenza Archeologica di Ostia.Google Scholar
Pensabene, P. 1998. ‘Il fenomeno del marmo nella Roma tardo-repubblicana e imperiale’, in Pensabene, P. (ed.), Marmi antichi II. Cave e tecnica di lavorazione, provenienze e distribuizone. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider, 333–90.Google Scholar
Pensabene, P. 2010. ‘Cave di marmo bianco e pavonazzetto in Frigia. Sulla produzione e sui dati epigrafici’, Marmora 6: 71134.Google Scholar
Pensabene, P. 2013. I marmi nella Roma antica. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
Pfanner, M. 1988. ‘Vom “Laufenden Bohrer” bis zum “Bohrlosen Stil”. Überlegungen zur Bohrtechnik in der Antike’, Archäologischer Anzeiger: 667–76.Google Scholar
Pfanner, M. 1989. ‘Über das Herstellen von Porträts: Ein Beitrag zu Rationalisierungsmassnahmen und Produktionsmechanismen von Massenware im späten Hellenismus und in der römischen Kaiserzeit’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 104: 157257.Google Scholar
Picón, C. A. 1995. ‘Polykleitan and Related Sculptures in American Collections: Recent Acquisitions’, in Moon, W. G. (ed.), Polykleitos, the Doryphoros, and Tradition. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 229–45.Google Scholar
Piwowarczyk, K. 2000. ‘Le dauphin. Attribut des statues romaines’, in Ciałowicz, K. M. and Ostrowski, J. A. (eds), Les civilisations du bassin méditerranéen. Hommages à Joachim Śliwa. Cracow: Instytut archeologii UJ, 299305.Google Scholar
Platt, V. 2011. Facing the Gods. Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Platt, V. and Squire, M. (eds) 2017. The Frame in Classical Art. A Cultural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316677155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poeschel, S. 2002–3. ‘Agostino Cornacchinis Reiterstandbild Karl des Großen im Portikus von Sankt Peter in Rom’, in Kraus, T. and Pabst, K. (eds), Karl der Große und sein Nachleben in Geschichte, Kunst und Literatur. Zeitschrift des Aachener Geschichtsvereins 104–5: 673703.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. 1970. ‘What is a Painting?’, British Journal of Aesthetics 10: 225–36 (= The American Scholar 39, 1970: 655–69).10.1093/bjaesthetics/10.3.225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollini, J. 1987. The Portraiture of Gaius and Lucius Caesar. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. 1974. The Ancient View of Greek Art: Criticism, History, and Terminology. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. 2000. ‘The Phantom of a Rhodian School of Sculpture’, in de Grummond, N. T. and Ridgway, B. S. (eds), From Pergamon to Sperlonga. Sculpture and Context. Berkeley-Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 92110.10.1525/9780520924833-009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope-Hennessy, J. 1964. Catalogue of Italian Sculpture in the Victoria and Albert Museum, 3 vols. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Preisshofen, R. 2002. ‘Der Apollon Sauroktonos des Praxiteles’, Antike Plastik 28: 41115.Google Scholar
Pressouyre, S. 1984. Nicolas Cordier. Recherches sur la sculpture à Rome autour de 1600. Rome: École Française de Rome.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2008. ‘Artemis, her Shrine, and her Smile: Winckelmann’s Discovery of Ancient Greek Polychromy’, in Brinkmann, V., Primavesi, O. and Hollein, M. (eds), Circumlitio. The Polychromy of Antique and Mediaeval Sculpture. Frankfurt am Main: Liebieghaus Skulpturensammlung, 2477.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2011. ‘Das Lächeln der Artemis. Winckelmanns Entdeckung der Farbigkeit griechischer Skulptur’, in Kunze, M. (ed.), Die Artemis von Pompeji und die Entdeckung der Farbigkeit griechischer Plastik. Ruhpolding: Franz Philipp Rutzen, 1767.Google Scholar
Prioux, E. 2006. ‘Materiae non cedit opus. Matières et sujets dans les épigrammes descriptives (IIIe siècle av. J.-C. – 50 apr. J.-C.)’, in Rouveret, A., Dubel, S. and Naas, V. (eds), Couleurs et matières dans l’Antiquité. Textes, techniques et pratiques. Paris: Éditions Rue d’Ulm, 127–60.Google Scholar
Prisco, G. 1991. ‘Dalle Terme al Museo di Napoli’, in Il Toro Farnese. La ‘montagna di marmo’ tra Roma e Napoli. Naples: Macchiaroli, 4768.Google Scholar
Proskynitopoulou, R. 2012. ‘L’Éphèbe de Sarrebruck X 26087. Quelques observations techniques sur sa mise en oeuvre, sa restauration et sa présentation au Musée National Archéologique d’Athènes’, in Denoyelle, M., Descamps-Lequime, S., Mille, B. and Verger, S. (eds), Bronzes grecs et romains, recherches récentes. Hommage à Claude Rolley. Paris: Institut National d’Histoire de l’Art. https://inha.revues.org/3905.Google Scholar
Pucci, G. 2008. ‘Agency, oggetto, immagine. L’antropologia dell’arte di Alfred Gell e l’antichità classica’, Ricerche di Storia dell’Arte 94: 3540.Google Scholar
Raeder, J. 2000. Die antiken Skulpturen in Petworth House (West Sussex). Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Raepsaet, G. 1984. ‘Transport de tambours de colonnes du Pentélique à Éleusis au IVe siècle avant notre ère’, L’antiquité classique 53: 101–36.Google Scholar
Raepsaet, G. 2008. ‘Land Transport, Part 2: Riding, Harnesses, and Vehicles’, in Oleson, J. P. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 580605.Google Scholar
Rausa, F. 1994. L’immagine del vincitore. L’atleta nella statuaria greca dall’età arcaica all’ellenismo. Rome: Viella.Google Scholar
Rice, E. E. 1986. ‘Prosopographika Rhodiaka’, Annual of the British School at Athens 81: 109250.10.1017/S0068245400020165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, G. M. A. 1915. Greek, Etruscan and Roman Bronzes. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Richter, G. M. A. 1931. ‘The Hermes of Praxiteles’, American Journal of Archaeology 35: 277–90.10.2307/498566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, G. M. A. 1935. ‘Another Copy of the Diadoumenos by Polykleitos’, American Journal of Archaeology 39: 4652.10.2307/498764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, G. M. A. 1954. Metropolitan Museum of Art. Catalogue of Greek Sculptures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Richter, G. M. A. 1955. Ancient Italy. A Study of the Interrelations of its People as Shown in their Arts. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Richter, G. M. A. 1962. ‘How were the Roman Copies of Greek Portraits Made?Römische Mitteilungen 69: 52–8.Google Scholar
Richter, G. M. A. 1968. Korai. Archaic Greek Maidens. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Richter, G. M. A. 1970. Kouroi. Archaic Greek Youths. 3rd edn. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Ridgway, B. S. 1966. ‘Stone and Metal in Greek Sculpture’, Archaeology 19: 3142.Google Scholar
Ridgway, B. S. 1974. ‘A Story of Five Amazons’, American Journal of Archaeology 78: 117.10.2307/503751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgway, B. S. 1984. Roman Copies of Greek Sculpture. The Problem of the Originals. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ridgway, B. S. 1990. Hellenistic Sculpture, vol. I, The Styles of ca. 331–200 B.C. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Ridgway, B. S. 2002. Hellenistic Sculpture, vol. III, The Styles of ca. 100–31 B.C. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Rizzo, G. E. 1907. ‘Il Discobolo di Castel Porziano’, Bollettino d’Arte 1: 314.Google Scholar
Rizzo, G. E. 1932. Prassitele. Milan and Rome: Treves, Treccani & Tumminelli.Google Scholar
Robert, C. 1919. Die antiken Sarkophagreliefs, vol. III.3, Einzelmythen. Niobiden – Triptolemos. Berlin: Grote.Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1962. ‘Les Kordakia de Nicée, le combustible de Synnada et les poissons-scies. Sur des lettres d’un métropolite de Phrygie au Xe siècle. Philologie et réalités, II’, Journal des Savants: 574.10.3406/jds.1962.1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, R. 1995. ‘Immensa potentia artis. Prestige et statut des œuvres d’art à Rome à la fin de la République et au début de l’Empire’, Revue Archéologique: 291305.Google Scholar
Robertson, M. 1981. A Shorter History of Greek Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rockwell, P. 1991. ‘Unfinished Statuary Associated with a Sculptor’s Studio’, in Smith, R. R. R. and Eri, K. T.m (eds), Aphrodisias Papers, vol. II, The Theatre, a Sculptor’s Workshop, Philosophers, and Coin-Types. Ann Arbor, MI (Journal of Roman Archaeology, supplementary series, 2), 127–43.Google Scholar
Rockwell, P. 1993. The Art of Stoneworking: A Reference Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rockwell, P. 1997. ‘La tecnica scultorea di Apollo e Dafne’, in Hermann Fiore, K. (ed.), Apollo e Dafne del Bernini nella Galleria Borghese. Cinisello Balsamo: Silvana Editoriale, 139–47.Google Scholar
Rodowick, D. N. 1994. ‘Impure Mimesis, or the Ends of the Aesthetics’, in Brunette, P. and Wills, D. (eds), Deconstruction and the Visual Arts. Art, Media, and Architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 96117.Google Scholar
Romano, I. B. 1988. ‘Early Greek Cult Images and Cult Practices’, in Hägg, R., Marinatos, N. and Nordquist, G. C. (eds), Early Greek Cult Practice. Stockholm: Åström (=Acta Instituti Atheniensis Regni Sueciae, 38), 127–33.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, E. 1960. A Catalogue of Cyrenaican Portrait Sculpture. London: British Academy.Google Scholar
Rouveret, A. 1989. Histoire et imaginaire de la peinture ancienne. Ve siècle av. J.-C.–Ier siècle ap. J.-C. Rome: École Française de Rome (reprint: École Française de Rome, Classiques, 2014).Google Scholar
Rubensohn, O. 1935. ‘Parische Künstler’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 50: 4969.Google Scholar
Rusnak, T. J. 2001. ‘The Active Spectator: Art and the Viewer in Ancient Greece’, unpublished PhD thesis, Bryn Mawr College.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 2013a. The Economics of the Roman Stone Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656394.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. 2013b. ‘Roman and Late-Antique Shipwrecks with Stone Cargoes: A New Inventory’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 26: 331–61.10.1017/S1047759413000184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. 2015. ‘Transport and Distribution’, in Friedland, Grunow Sobocinski, and Gazda 2015: 189–205.Google Scholar
Russenberger, C. 2015. Der Tod und die Mädchen. Amazonen auf römischen Sarkophagen. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S. H. 2012. Ancient Rome as a Museum. Power, Identity, and the Culture of Collecting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Säflund, G. 1972. The Polyphemus and Scylla Groups at Sperlonga. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Saladino, V. 2006. ‘The Athlete with a Strigil’, in Michelucci, M. (ed.), Apoxyomenos. The Athlete of Croatia. Florence: Giunti, 3551.Google Scholar
Sargent, M. L. and Therkildsen, R. H. 2010. ‘The Technical Investigation of Sculptural Polychromy at the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek 2009–2010. An Outline’, in Østergaard, J. S. (ed.), Tracking Colour. The Polychromy of Greek and Roman Sculpture in the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Preliminary Report, vol. II. Copenhagen: Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, 1126 (available for download at www.trackingcolour.com).Google Scholar
Schade, K. 1998. ‘Die zwei Gesichter der Berliner Knöchelspielerin’, Jahrbuch der Berliner Museen 40: 187–98.10.2307/4125998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schade, K. 2007. ‘Ein Paragone der Künste. Betrachtungen zur Idealplastik der mittleren Kaiserzeit’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 122: 163–99.Google Scholar
Schädler, U. 1992. ‘Antiken für das Neue Museum. Ausgrabungen Pius VI. in der Villa der Quintilier’, Antike Welt 23: 201–18.Google Scholar
Schapiro, M. 1969. ‘On Some Problems in the Semiotics of Visual Art: Field and Vehicle in Image-Signs’, Semiotica 1: 223–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, E. E. 1968. ‘Die Mars-Venus-Gruppe im Museo Capitolino’, Antike Plastik 8: 8594.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. E. 1973. ‘Die Kopien der Erechtheionkoren’, Antike Plastik 13.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1969. Der Basler Medeasarkophag. Ein Meisterwerk spätantoninischer Kunst. Tübingen: Wasmuth.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. 2009. ‘Images of Statues on Attic Vases: The Cases of the Tyrannicides’, in Nørskov, V., Hannestad, L., Isler-Kerényi, C. and Lewis, S. (eds), The World of Greek Vases. Rome: Quasar (Analecta Romana Instituti Danici. Supplementum, 41), 219–37.Google Scholar
Schneider, C. 1999. Die Musengruppe von Milet. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern (Deutsches Archäologisches Institut. Milesische Forschungen, 1).Google Scholar
Schoch, K. 2009. Die doppelte Aphrodite – alt und neu bei griechischen Kultbildern. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Scholl, A. and Platz-Horster, G. (eds) 2007. Die Antikensammlung. Altes Museum. Pergamonmuseum. Berlin: Staatliche Museen zu Berlin and P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Schrader, H. 1924. Phidias. Frankfurt: Frankfurter Verlags-Anstalt A.G.Google Scholar
Schröder, S. F. 2004. Katalog der antiken Skulpturen des Museo del Prado in Madrid, vol. II, Idealplastik. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Schröder, S. F. (ed.) 2009. Verwandelte Götter. Antike Skulpturen des Museo del Prado zu Gast in Dresden. Catalogue of the exhibition. Dresden and Madrid: Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden and Museo del Prado.Google Scholar
Scigliano, E. 2005. Michelangelo’s Mountain. The Quest for Perfection in the Marble Quarries of Carrara. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sena Chiesa, G. (ed.) 2012. Costantino 313 d.C. Catalogue of the exhibition. Milan: Electa.Google Scholar
Sepe, C. 2008. ‘Regiones VII–VIII’, in Carrella, A., D’Acunto, L. A., Inserra, N. and Sepe, C., Marmora pompeiana nel Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Napoli: gli arredi scultorei delle case pompeiane. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider, 109–53.Google Scholar
Settis, S. 1992. ‘Fortuna del Diadumeno. I testi’, Numismatica e Antichità Classiche. Quaderni Ticinesi 21: 5168.Google Scholar
Settis, S. 1999. Laocoonte. Fama e stile. Rome: Donzelli.Google Scholar
Sichtermann, H. and Koch, G. 1975. Griechische Mythen auf römischen Sarkophagen. Tübingen: Wasmuth.Google Scholar
Silva Maroto, M. P. 1995. ‘La escultura en Madrid en la época de Carlos II. Importación de obras y coleccionismo’, Anales de Historia del Arte 5: 205–24.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. 1902. ‘Der Bildrahmen. Ein ästhetischer Versuch’, Der Tag 541, 18 Nov. (=‘The Picture Frame: An Aesthetic Study’, tr. M. Ritter, Theory, Culture and Society 11 (1994): 11–17).Google Scholar
Simon, E. 1957. ‘Zur Augustusstatue von Prima Porta’, Römische Mitteilungen 64: 4668.Google Scholar
Simonato, L. 2005. ‘Ludovico Sergardi, Agostino Cornacchini e la statua vaticana del Carlo Magno’, Prospettiva 119–20: 2363.Google Scholar
Slater, N. W. 1998. ‘Passion and Petrifaction. The Gaze in Apuleius’, Classical Philology 93: 1848.10.1086/449372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slavazzi, F. 1996. Italia verius quam provincia. Diffusione e funzione delle copie di sculture greche nella Gallia Narbonense. Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar
Slavazzi, F. 2002. ‘Immagini riflesse. Copie e doppi nelle sculture di Villa Adriana’, in Reggiani, A. M. (ed.), Villa Adriana. Paesaggio antico e ambiente moderno. Elementi di novità e ricerche in corso. Milan: Electa, 5261.Google Scholar
Smith, A. H. 1892–1904. A Catalogue of Sculpture in the Department of Greek and Roman Antiquities. British Museum, 3 vols. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 1991. Hellenistic Sculpture. A Handbook. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. (ed.) 2006. Aphrodisias II. Roman Portrait Statuary from Aphrodisias. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Soleti, V. M. 2010. La scultura ideale romana nella Regio Secunda (Apulia et Calabria). Rome: Giorgio Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Spinola, G. 2004. Il Museo Pio Clementino, vol. III. Vatican City: Musei Vaticani 2004.Google Scholar
Spyropoulos, G. 2001. Drei Meisterwerke der griechischen Plastik aus der Villa des Herodes Atticus zu Eva/Loukou. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2007. ‘The Motto in the Grotto. Inscribing Illustration and Illustrating Inscription at Sperlonga’, in Newby, Z. and Leader-Newby, R. (eds), Art and Inscriptions in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 102–27.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2009. Image and Text in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2013. ‘Embodied Ambiguities on the Prima Porta Augustus’, Art History 36: 242–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stähli, A. 1999. Die Verweigerung der Lüste. Erotische Gruppen in der antiken Plastik. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Stähli, A. 2003. ‘Erzählte Zeit, Erzählzeit und Wahrnehmungszeit. Zum Verhältnis von Temporalität und Narration, speziell in der hellenistischen Plastik’, in Bol, P. C. (ed.), Zum Verhältnis von Raum und Zeit in der griechischen Kunst. Möhnesee: Bibliopolis, 239–64.Google Scholar
Steinhauer, G. 2001. The Archaeological Museum of Piraeus. Athens: Latsis Group (= Steinhauer, G., Ta mnēmeia kai to Archaiologiko Mouseio tou Peiraia. Athens: Toumpēs, 1998).Google Scholar
Stemmer, K. (ed.) 1995. Standorte. Kontext und Funktion antiker Skulptur. Berlin: Freunde & Förderer der Abguss-Sammlung Antiker Plastik e.V.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. 2015. Callimachus: The Hymns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. 1977a. Skopas of Paros. Park Ridge: Noyes Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. 1977b. ‘To Entertain an Emperor: Sperlonga, Laocoon and Tiberius at the Dinner-Table’, Journal of Roman Studies 67: 7690.10.2307/299920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, A. 1990. Greek Sculpture. An Exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, P. 2003. Statues in Roman Society. Representation and Response. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stirling, L. M. 1996. ‘Divinities and Heroes in the Age of Ausonius: A Late-Antique Villa and Sculptural Collection at Saint-Georges-de-Montagne (Gironde)’, Revue Archéologique: 103–45.Google Scholar
Stirling, L. M. 1997a. ‘Late-Antique Goddesses and Other Statuary at the Villa of La-Garenne-de-Nérac (Lot-et-Garonne)’, Echos du Monde Classique / Classical Views 41, ns 16: 149–75.Google Scholar
Stirling, L. M. 1997b. ‘Statuary Collecting and Display in the Late Antique Villas of Gaul and Spain: A Comparative Study’, in Bauer, F. A. and Witschel, C. (eds), Statuen in der Spätantike. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 307–21.Google Scholar
Stirling, L. M. 2005. The Learned Collector. Mythological Statuettes and Classical Taste in Late Antique Gaul. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.17459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, L. M. 2008. ‘Pagan Statuettes in Late Antique Corinth: Sculpture from the Panayia Domus’, Hesperia 77: 89161.10.2972/hesp.77.1.89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, I. and Stone, J. 1962. I, Michelangelo, Sculptor. An Autobiography through Letters. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co.Google Scholar
Strocka, V. M. 1999. ‘Zur Datierung der Sperlonga-Gruppen und des Laokoon’, in Gedenkschrift für Andreas Linfert. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern, 307–22.Google Scholar
Strong, D. and Claridge, A. 1976. ‘Marble Sculpture’, in Strong, D. and Brown, D. (eds), Roman Crafts. London: Duckworth, 195207.Google Scholar
Stuart Jones, H. 1912. A Catalogue of the Ancient Sculptures Preserved in the Municipal Collections of Rome: The Sculptures of the Museo Capitolino. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stuart Jones, H. 1926. A Catalogue of the Ancient Sculptures Preserved in the Municipal Collections of Rome. The Sculptures of the Palazzo dei Conservatori. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Studniczka, F. 1888. ‘Die archaische Artemisstatuette aus Pompeii’, Römische Mitteilungen 3: 277302.Google Scholar
Studniczka, F. 1910. ‘Zur Augustusstatue der Livia’, Römische Mitteilungen 25, 2755.Google Scholar
Studniczka, F. 1926. Artemis und Iphigenie. Marmorgruppe der Ny Carlsberg Glyptothek. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Swetnam-Burland, M. 2015. Egypt in Rome. Visions of Egypt in Roman Imperial Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. and Osborne, R. 2007. ‘Introduction: Art and Agency and Art History’, in Osborne, R. and J. Tanner, (eds), Art’s Agency and Art History. Malden, MA: Blackwell (New Interventions in Art History), 1–27.Google Scholar
Themelis, P. G. 1998–1999. ‘Statuenfunde aus dem Gymnasion von Messene’, Nürnberger Blätter zur Archäologie 15: 5984.Google Scholar
Themelis, P. G. 2003. Das antike Messene. Athens: Ministry of Culture.Google Scholar
Themelis, P. G. 2013. ‘The Doryphoros of Messene’, in Franciosi, V. and Themelis, P. G. (eds), Pompei/Messene. Il Doriforo e il suo contesto. Naples: Università degli Studi Suor Orsola Benincasa, 125209.Google Scholar
Thouvenot, R. 1927. Catalogue des figurines et objets de bronze du Musée Archéologique de Madrid, vol. I, Bronzes grecs et romains. Bordeaux and Paris: Feret and de Boccard.Google Scholar
Tuchelt, K. 1979. Frühe Denkmäler Roms in Kleinasien. Beiträge zur archäologischen Überlieferung aus der Zeit der Republik und des Augustus, Teil 1, Roma und Promagistrate. Tübingen: Wasmuth (Istanbuler Mitteilungen. Beiheft 23).Google Scholar
Treu, G. 1897. Die Bildwerke von Olympia in Stein und Thon, vol. III. Berlin: Asher & Co.Google Scholar
Trimble, J. 2011. Women and Visual Replication in Roman Imperial Art and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Keuren, F., Cox, J. E., Attanasio, D., Prochaska, W., Herrmann, J. J. Jr. and Abramitis, D. H. 2015. ‘Parian Lychnites and the Badminton Sarcophagus in New York’, in Pensabene, P. and Gasparini, E. (eds), Asmosia X. Proceedings of the 10h International Conference of ASMOSIA. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider, 403–11.Google Scholar
Vermeule, C. C. 1964. ‘Aphrodisiaca: Satyr, Maenad and Eros. A Romano-Hellenistic Marble Group of the Third Century ad in Boston’, in Freeman Sandler, L. (ed.), Essays in Memory of Karl Lehmann. New York: Institute of Fine Arts, 359–74.Google Scholar
Vermeule, C. C. 1977. Greek Sculpture and Roman Taste. The Purpose and Setting of Graeco-Roman Art in Italy and the Greek Imperial East. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Vermeule, C. C. and Brauer, A. 1990. Stone Sculptures. The Greek, Roman and Etruscan Collections of the Harvard University Art Museums. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Art Museums.Google Scholar
Vermeule, C. C. and Neuerburg, N. 1973. Catalogue of the Ancient Art in the J. Paul Getty Museum. The Larger Statuary, Wall Paintings and Mosaics. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Verri, G., Opper, T. and Deviese, T. 2000. ‘The Treu Head. A Case Study in Roman Sculptural Polychromy’, The British Museum. Technical Research Bulletin 4: 3954.Google Scholar
Verri, G., Opper, T. and Lazzarini, L. 2014. ‘In picturae modum variata circumlitio? The Reconstruction of the Polychromy of a Roman Ideal Female Head (Treu Head)’, in Liverani, P. and Santamaria, U. (eds), Diversamente bianco: la policromia della scultura romana. Rome: Quasar, 149–83.Google Scholar
Vierneisel-Schlörb, B. 1979. Glyptothek München. Katalog der Skulpturen, vols. I–II, Klassische Skulpturen des 5. und 4. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Visconti, E. Q. 1782–96. Museo Pio-Clementino. 7 vols. Rome: L. Mirri.Google Scholar
Vlachogianni, E. 2012a. ‘Sculpture’, in Christopoulou, A., Gadolou, A. and Bouyia, P. (eds), The Antikythera Shipwreck. The Technology of the Ship, the Cargo and the Mechanism. Athens: National Archaeological Museum, 3845.Google Scholar
Vlachogianni, E. 2012b. ‘Sculpture’, in Kaltsas, Vlachogianni, and Bouyia 2012: 62–79.Google Scholar
von Blanckenhagen, P. H. 1957. ‘Narration in Hellenistic and Roman Art’, American Journal of Archaeology 61: 7883.10.2307/501084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Blanckenhagen, P. H. 1969. ‘Laokoon, Sperlonga und Vergil’, Archäologischer Anzeiger 84: 427–42.Google Scholar
von Blanckenhagen, P. H. 1973. Review of: G. Säflund, The Polyphemus and Scylla Groups at Sperlonga (Stockholm, 1972). American Journal of Archaeology 77: 456–60.Google Scholar
von Blanckenhagen, P. H. 1976. Review of: B. Conticello and B. Andreae, Die Skulpturen von Sperlonga (Berlin, 1974). American Journal of Archaeology 80: 99104.10.2307/502960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von den Hoff, R. 2004. ‘Horror and Amazement. Colossal Mythological Statue Groups and the New Rhetoric of Images in Late Second and Early Third Century Rome’, in Borg, B. E. (ed.), Paideia: The World of the Second Sophistic. Berlin: De Gruyter, 105–29.Google Scholar
von Gerkan, A. and Krischen, F. 1928. Thermen und Palaestren. Berlin: Hans Schoetz & Co. (Milet. Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen und Untersuchungen, vol. I.9).Google Scholar
von Moock, D. W. 1998. Die figürlichen Grabstelen Attikas in der Kaiserzeit. Studien zur Verbreitung, Chronologie, Typologie und Ikonographie. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Vorster, C. 1993a. Römische Skulpturen des späten Hellenismus und der Kaiserzeit, vol. I, Werke nach Vorlagen und Bildformeln des 5. und 4. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Vorster, C. 1993b. ‘Torsorepliken des Leidener Pan’, in Beck and Bol 1993: 193219.Google Scholar
Vorster, C. 2007. ‘Die Plastik des späten Hellenismus – Porträts und rundplastische Gruppen’, in Bol, P. C. (ed.), Die Geschichte der antiken Bildhauerkunst, vol. III, Klassische Plastik. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern, 273331.Google Scholar
Vorster, C. 2012–2013. ‘Spätantike Bildhauerwerkstätten in Rom. Beobachtungen zur Idealskulptur der Nachkonstantinischen Zeit’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 127–8: 393496.Google Scholar
Waetzoldt, H. 2007. ‘The Use of Wool for the Production of Strings, Ropes, Braided Mats, and Similar Fabrics’, in Gillis, C. and Nosch, M.-L. B. (eds), Ancient Textiles. Production, Craft and Society. Oxford: Oxbow, 112–21.Google Scholar
Waldhauer, O. 1936. Die antiken Skulpturen der Ermitage, vol. III. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wallace, W. E. 2015. ‘An Impossible Task’, in Helmstutler Di Dio 2015: 4758.Google Scholar
Wardropper, I. 1999. ‘Cristoforo Stati’s Samson and the Lion. Florentine Style and Spanish Patronage’, Apollo 150.451: 30–7.Google Scholar
Wardropper, I. 2011. European Sculpture, 1400–1900 in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York and New Haven: Metropolitan Museum of Art and Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Waywell, G. B. 1978. The Free-Standing Sculptures of the Mausoleum at Halicarnassus in the British Museum. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Waywell, G. B. 1986. The Lever and Hope Sculptures. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
Waywell, G. B. 1996. ‘Scilla nell’arte antica’, in Andreae, B. and Parisi Presicce, C. (eds), Ulisse. Il mito e la memoria. Rome: Progetti Museali Editore, 108–19.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2008. ‘Inside the Mask: Pantomime from the Performers’ Perspective’, in Hall, E. and Wyles, R. (eds), New Directions in Ancient Pantomime. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4360.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232536.003.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. 1996. ‘Zum griechischen Athletenbild. Zum Typus und zur Gattung des Originals der Apoxyomenosstatue im Vatikan’, Römische Mitteilungen 103: 3149.Google Scholar
Weege, F. 1929. Der einschenkende Satyr aus Sammlung Mengarini. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Weinstock, H. 2012. Statuenstützen an vorkaiserzeitlichen Marmorstatuen. Ein Beitrag zur Chronologie der griechischen Plastik. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač.Google Scholar
Weis, H. A. 2000. ‘Odysseus at Sperlonga. Hellenistic Hero or Roman Heroic Foil?’, in de Grummond, N. T. and Ridgway, B. S. (eds), From Pergamon to Sperlonga. Sculpture and Context. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 111–65.Google Scholar
Weitmann, P. 2012. ‘Das Messinstrument aus dem Hanghaus 2 in Ephesos – der älteste erhaltene Pantograph?’, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Archäologischen Institutes 81: 331–6.Google Scholar
Welcker, F. G. 1849. ‘Der Myronische Diskuswerfer’, in Alte Denkmäler, vol. I, Die Giebelgruppen und andere Griechische Gruppen und Statuen. Göttingen: Dieterichsche Buchhandlung, 418–29.Google Scholar
Wenzel, C. H. 2005. An Introduction to Kant’s Aesthetics. Core Concepts and Problems. Malden, MA, and London: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470776599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittkower, R. 1961. ‘Cornacchinis Reiterstatue Karls der Grossen in St. Peter’, in Miscellanea Bibliothecae Hertzianae. Munich: Schroll, 464–73.Google Scholar
Wittkower, R. 1997. Bernini. The Sculptor of the Roman Baroque. 4th edn. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Wittkower, R. 1999. Art and Architecture in Italy 1600–1750. 6th edn, revised by J. Connors and J. Montagu. 3 vols. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wixom, W. D. 1967. ‘Early Christian Sculptures at Cleveland’, Bulletin of the Cleveland Museum of Art 54.3: 6788.Google Scholar
Wixom, W. D. 1979. ‘Portrait Busts, Good Shepherd, and Jonah Figures’, in Weitzmann, K. (ed.), Age of Spirituality Late Antique and Early Christian Art, Third to Seventh Century. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 406–10.Google Scholar
Wollheim, R. 1980. Art and its Objects. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wrede, H. 1986. Die antike Herme. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern (Trierer Beiträge zur Altertumskunde).Google Scholar
Yfantidis, K. 1984. Die Polychromie der Hellenistischen Plastik, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Mainz.Google Scholar
Younger, J. G. and Rehak, P. 2009. ‘Technical Observations on the Sculptures from the Temple of Zeus at Olympia’, Hesperia 78: 41105.10.2972/hesp.78.1.41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanker, P. 1974. Klassizistische Statuen. Studien zur Veränderung des Kunstgeschmacks in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.12362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanker, P. 1989. ‘Ein Augustusenkel als klassischer Pais’, in Cain, H.-U., Gabelmann, H. and Salzmann, D. (eds), Festschrift für Nikolaus Himmelmann. Beiträge zur Ikonographie und Hermeneutik. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern, 351–4.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1992. ‘Nachahmen als kulturelles Schicksal’, in Lenz, C. (ed.), Probleme der Kopie von der Antike bis zum 19. Jahrhundert: vier Vorträge. Munich: Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlung, 924.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1997. ‘In Search of the Roman Viewer’, in Buitron-Oliver, D. (ed.), The Interpretation of Architectural Sculpture in Greece and Rome. Washington, DC: National Gallery of Art, 179–91.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 2002. Un’arte per l’impero. Funzione e intenzione delle immagini nel mondo romano. Milan: Electa.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. and Ewald, B. C. 2012. Living with Myths. The Imagery of Roman Sarcophagi, tr. J. Slater. Oxford: Oxford University Press (= Mit Mythen leben. Die Bilderwelt der römischen Sarkophage. Munich: Hirmer, 2004).Google Scholar
Zevi, F. (ed.) 1983. Baia. Il ninfeo imperiale sommerso di Punta Epitaffio. Benevento: Banca Sannitica.Google Scholar
Zikos, D. 1996. ‘Antikenkopien in Bronze des Massimiliano Soldani Benzi’, in Krahn, V. (ed.), Von allen Seiten schön. Bronzen der Renaissance und des Barock. Rückblicke auf Ausstellung und Kolloquium, vol. I, Dokumentation zu Ausstellung und Kolloquium. Cologne: Letter-Stiftung, 125–38.Google Scholar
Zimmer, K. B. 2014. Im Zeichen der Schönheit. Form, Funktion und Stellenwert klassischer Skulpturen im Hellenismus am Beispiel der Göttin Aphrodite. Rahden: Verlag Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Anna Anguissola, Università degli Studi, Pisa
  • Book: Supports in Roman Marble Sculpture
  • Online publication: 01 February 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290036.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Anna Anguissola, Università degli Studi, Pisa
  • Book: Supports in Roman Marble Sculpture
  • Online publication: 01 February 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290036.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Anna Anguissola, Università degli Studi, Pisa
  • Book: Supports in Roman Marble Sculpture
  • Online publication: 01 February 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290036.013
Available formats
×