Abelson, D. E. (2002). Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Abelson, D. E. (2009). Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes. 2nd ed. (revised and expanded). Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abelson, D. E. (2016). Northern Lights: Exploring Canada’s Think Tank Landscape. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abelson, D. E. (2018). Any better ideas? Think tanks and policy analysis in Canada. In Dobuzinskis, L. and Howlett, M. (eds.), Policy Analysis in Canada. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 275–96.Google Scholar

Abelson, D. E., and Lindquist, E. A. (2000). Think tanks across North America. In Weaver, R. K. and McGann, J. G. (eds.), Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalyst for Ideas and Action. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 37–66.Google Scholar

Aberbach, J. D., and Rockman, B. A. (1989). On the rise, transformation, and decline of analysis in the US government. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 2(3): 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aberbach, J. D., and Rockman, B. A. (1994). Civil servants and policymakers: Neutral or responsive competence? Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 7(4): 461–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

AGRAGA/Advisory Group on the Reform of Australian Government Administration (2009). Reform of Australian Government Administration: Building the World’s Best Public Service. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar

Althaus, C. (2011). Assessing the capacity to deliver – the BER experience. Australian Journal of Public Administration 70(4): 421–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ANAO (Australian National Audit Office) (2010). Effective Cross-Agency Agreements. Audit Report No. 41 2009–2010. Canberra: ANAO.Google Scholar

APSC (Australian Public Service Commission) (2014). State of the Service Report 2013–14. Canberra: APSC.Google Scholar

APSR (Australian Public Service Review) (2019). Interim Report. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Canberra. www.apsreview.gov.au/priorities.Google Scholar

Aucoin, P. (1995). The New Public Management: Canada in Comparative Perspective. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar

Aucoin, P. (2002). Beyond the ‘new’ in public management. In Dunn, C. (ed.), A Handbook of Canadian Public Administration. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, pp. 32–57.Google Scholar

Aucoin, P. (2010). Canada. In Eichbaum, C. and Shaw, R. (eds.), Partisan Appointees and Public Servants: An International Analysis. Boston, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 64–93.Google Scholar

Aucoin, P. (2012). New political governance in Westminster systems: Impartial public administration and management performance at risk. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 25(2): 177–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aucoin, P., Jarvis, M. and Turnbull, L. (2011). Democratizing the Constitution: Reforming Responsible Government. Toronto: Emond Publishing.Google Scholar

Aucoin, P., Smith, J. and Dinsdale, G. (2004). Responsible Government: Clarifying Essentials, Dispelling Myths and Exploring Change. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development.Google Scholar

Auditor-General (Australia) (2017). Australian Government Procurement Contract Reporting 2017–2018. ANAO Report No.19 2017–18. Canberra: ANAO. ISSN 2203–0352 (Online).Google Scholar

Baker, R. J. S. (1972). Administrative Theory and Public Administration. London: Hutchinson University Library.Google Scholar

Bakvis, H. (1997). Advising the executive: Think tanks, consultants, political staff and kitchen cabinets. In Weller, P., Bakvis, H. and Rhodes, R. A. W. (eds.), The Hollow Crown: Countervailing Trends in Core Executives. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, pp. 84–125.Google Scholar

Bakvis, H. (2000). Rebuilding policy capacity in the era of the fiscal dividend. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 13(1): 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakvis, H. (2013). In the shadows of hierarchy: Intergovernmental governance in Canada and the European Union. Canadian Public Administration 56(2): 203–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakvis, H., and Juillet, L. (2004). The Horizontal Challenge: Line Department, Central Agencies and Leadership. Ottawa: The Canada School of Public Service.Google Scholar

Balls, K. (2019, 17 August). How No. 10 Downing Street is taking back control. The Spectator.Google Scholar

Banks, G. (2011, 22 September). Independent Policy Advice and the Productivity Commission. Chancellor’s Lecture, Swinburne University.Google Scholar

Banks, G. (2012, 1 November). Productivity Policies: The ‘To Do’ List. Economic and Social Outlook Conference, Securing the Future, Melbourne.Google Scholar

Banks, G. (2013). The Governance of Public Policy: Lectures in Honour of Eminent Australians. Melbourne: Australian and New Zealand School of Government.Google Scholar

Banks, G. (2014). Making public policy in the public interest. In Prasser, S. and Tracey, H. (eds.), Royal Commissions and Public Inquiries: Practice and Potential. Ballarat: Connorcourt Publishing, pp. 112–32.Google Scholar

Banks, G. (2015, 6–7 July). Institutions to Promote Pro-productivity Policies: Logic and Lessons. Global Dialogue on the Future of Productivity Growth: Towards an OECD Productivity Network. Mexico City.Google Scholar

Banks, G. (2018, 20 November). Whatever Happened to ‘Evidence Based Policy Making’? Alf Rattigan Lecture. Melbourne: ANZSOG. www.anzsog.edu.au/preview-documents/research-output/5307-alf-rattigan-lecture-2018.Google Scholar

Barberis, P. (1996). The Elite of the Elite: Permanent Secretaries in the British Higher Civil Service. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar

Beeby, D. (2011, 20 September). Tories hire $90,000-a-day consultant to help cut spending. The Globe and Mail. www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/tories-hire-90000-a-day-consultant-to-help-cut-federal-spending/article4256641/.Google Scholar

Behm, A. (2015). No, Minister: So You Want to Be Chief of Staff? Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar

Bell, S., and Hindmoor, A. (2009). Rethinking Governance: The Centrality of the State in Modern Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Bennett, O. (2019). Michael Gove: A Man in a Hurry. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar

Bentham, J. (2006). The IPPR and Demos: Think tanks of the new social democracy. Political Quarterly 77(2): 166–74.Google Scholar

Benton, M., and Russell, M. (2013). Assessing the impact of parliamentary oversight committees: The select committees in the British House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs 66(4): 772–97Google Scholar

Berardo, R., and Scholz, J. (2010). Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries. American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 632–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beveridge, R. (2012). Consultants, depoliticization and arena-shifting in the policy process: Privatizing water in Berlin. Policy Sciences 45(1): 47–68.Google Scholar

Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T. and O’Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review 65(5): 547–58.Google Scholar

Blick, A. (2018). Special advisers in the United Kingdom: Tensions in Whitehall. In Shaw, R. and Eichbaum, C. (eds.), Ministers, Minders and Mandarins: An International Study of Relationships at the Executive Summit of Parliamentary Democracies. London: Edward Elgar, pp. 180–97.Google Scholar

Blick, A. (2019). Populism and the UK Constitution. London: Constitution Society. https://consoc.org.uk/publications/populism-and-the-uk-constitution/.Google Scholar

Blick, A., and Jones, G. (2010). Premiership: The Development, Nature and Power of the Office of the British Prime Minister. Charlottesville, VA: Societas.Google Scholar

Blick, A., and Jones, G. (2013). At Power’s Elbow: Aides to Prime Ministers from Robert Walpole to David Cameron. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar

Bogdanor, V. (ed.) (2005). Joined-Up Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boston, J. (1994). Purchasing policy advice: The limits to contracting out. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 7(1): 1–30.Google Scholar

Boston, J. (2012). Reflections on new political governance in Westminster systems. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 25(2): 201–205.Google Scholar

Boston, J. (2016). Governing for the Future: Designing Democratic Institutions for a Better Tomorrow. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar

Boston, J. (2017). Safeguarding Your Future: Governing in an Uncertain World. Wellington: BWB Texts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boston, J., Bagnall, D. and Barry, A. (2019). Foresight, Insight and Oversight: Enhancing Long-Term Government through Better Parliamentary Scrutiny. Wellington: Institute for Governance and Policy Studies.Google Scholar

Boston, J., and Gill, D. (2011). Working across organizational boundaries: The challenge for accountability. In Ryan, B. and Gill, D. (eds.), Future State: Directions for Public Management in New Zealand. Wellington: Victoria University Press, pp. 212–46.Google Scholar

Boston, J., and Halligan, J. (2012). Political management and new political governance: Reconciling political responsiveness and neutral competence. In Bakvis, H. and Jarvis, M. (eds.), From New Public Management to New Political Governance: Essays in Honour of Peter C. Aucoin. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 204–41.Google Scholar

Boston, J., and Bullock, D. (2010). Multi-party governance: Managing the unity-distinctiveness dilemma in executive coalitions. Party Politics 18(3): 349–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J. and Walsh, P. (1996). Public Management: The New Zealand Model. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boucher, A. (2013). Bureaucratic control and policy change: A comparative venue shopping approach to skilled immigration policies in Australia and Canada. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 15(4): 349–67.Google Scholar

Boucher, M. (2018). Who you know in the PMO: Lobbying the Prime Minister’s Office in Canada. Canadian Public Administration 61(3): 317–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourgault, J. (2014). Federal deputy ministers: Serial servers looking for influence. In Bourgault, J. and Dunn, C. (eds.), Deputy Ministers in Canada: Comparative and Jurisdictional Perspectives. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 364–400.Google Scholar

Bourgault, J. (2018). Governance Issues for Deputy Ministers in Canadian Government in 2015. Draft manuscript.Google Scholar

Bourgault, J., and Dunn, C. (eds.) (2014a). Conclusion: Deputy ministers in Canada – evolution of deputy ministers as archetypal figures. In Bourgault, J. and Dunn, C. (eds.), Deputy Ministers in Canada: Comparative and Jurisdictional Perspectives. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 429–50.Google Scholar

Bourgault, J., and Dunn, C. (eds.) (2014b). Deputy Ministers in Canada: Comparative and Jurisdictional Perspectives. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Bousted, M. (2017, 4 August). The consequences of Gove’s ideological reforms are now being felt everywhere. TES.Google Scholar

Bowen, P. (2016). The Parliamentary Budget Office: Supporting Australian Democracy. Papers on Parliament no. 64. Canberra: Department of the Senate.Google Scholar

BPSAG/Better Public Services Advisory Group (2011). Better Public Services Advisory Group Report. Wellington: New Zealand Government.Google Scholar

Brans, M., Iris-Geneva, I. and Howlet, M. (eds.). (2017). Routledge Handbook of Comparative Policy Analysis. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bressers, D., van Twist, M. J. W., van der Steen, M. A. and Schulz, J. M. (2018). The contested autonomy of policy advisory bodies: The trade-off between autonomy and control of policy advisory bodies in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Sweden. In Ongaro, E. and Van Thiel, S. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1189–1211.Google Scholar

British Broadcasting Corporation (2020). PM’s senior aide Dominic Cummings calls for civil service changes. www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-50978329.Google Scholar

Bromell, D. (2017). The Art and Craft of Policy Advising: A Practical Guide. Gewerbestrasse: Springer.Google Scholar

Brown, G. (2017). My Life, Our Times. London: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar

Burgess, V. (2017, 12 July). APS leadership turnover set for another jolt – for better or for worse. Mandarin.Google Scholar

Bushell-Embling, D. (2017, 26 July). PM&C develops digital briefing system. Govtech Review. www.govtechreview.com.au/content/gov-digital/article/pm-amp-c-develops-digital-briefing-system-790769450.Google Scholar

Cabinet Office (UK) (2010). Code of conduct for special advisers. http://download.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/special-advisers/code-of-conduct.pdf.Google Scholar

Cabinet Office (UK) (2018). Annual report on special advisers. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/766413/AnnualReportOnSpecialAdvisers2018.pdf.Google Scholar

CAG/Comptroller and Auditor General (UK) (2006, December). Central Government’s Use of Consultants. HC 128. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar

CAG/Comptroller and Auditor General (UK) (2010, October). Central Government’s Use of Consultants and Interims. HC 488. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar

CAG/Comptroller and Auditor General (UK) (2016a, 13 January). Cross Government Use of Consultants and Temporary Staff. HC 603. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar

CAG/Comptroller and Auditor General (UK) (2016b, 23 February). Accountability to Parliament for Taxpayers’ Money. HC 849. Session 2015–16. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar

CAG/Comptroller and Auditor General (UK) (2016c, 21 July). Spending Review 2015. HC 571. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar

CAG/Comptroller and Auditor General (UK) (2018, 23 May). Investigation into Government-Funded Inquiries. HC 836. Session 2017–19. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar

CAG/Comptroller and Auditor General (UK) (2019, 7 June). Departments’ Use of Consultants to Support Preparations for EU Exit. HC 2105. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar

Caird, J. S. (2016, 30 November). Public inquiries: Non-statutory commissions of inquiry. House of Commons Library, Briefing Paper Number 02599.Google Scholar

Campbell, C., and Halligan, J. (1992). Political Leadership in an Age of Constraint: The Experience of Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin; Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, C., and Wilson, G. K. (1995). The End of Whitehall: Death of a Paradigm? Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Campbell, C., and Szablowski, G. (1979). The Superbureaucrats: Structure and Behaviour in Central Agencies. Toronto: Gage.Google Scholar

Carroll, B. W. (1990). Politics and administration: A trichotomy? Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 3(4): 345–66.Google Scholar

Carson, D., and Wellstead, A. (2015). Government with a cast of dozens: Policy capacity risks and policy work in the northern territory. Australian Journal of Public Administration 74(2): 162–75.Google Scholar

Cashore, B., and Howlett, M. (2007). Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in Pacific Northwest forestry. American Journal of Political Science 51(3): 532–51.Google Scholar

Castles, F. (1989). Big government in weak states: The paradox of state size in the English-speaking nations of advanced capitalism. Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 27(3): 267–93.Google Scholar

Chapman, R. (1996). The end of the civil service? In Barberis, P. (ed.), The Whitehall Reader: The UK’s Administrative Machine in Action. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 187–91.Google Scholar

Chowdhury, A. R. (2019). International–domestic linkages in a developing country context: The case of the Rohingyas in Bangladesh. Policy Studies 40(3–4): 303–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, T., and Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole of government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review 67(6): 1057–64.Google Scholar

Clarke, A. (2019). Opening the Government of Canada: The Federal Bureaucracy in the Digital Age. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, A., and Craft, J. (2017). The vestiges and vanguards of policy design in a digital context. Canadian Public Administration 60(4): 476–97.Google Scholar

Clift, B. (2018). The IMF and the Politics of Austerity in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, H. (2017, 27 March). WHATS-CAB: 18 Cabinet ministers used WhatsApp recently – including Amber Rudd who accused the messaging app of helping terrorists. The Sun. www.thesun.co.uk/news/3191673/eighteen-cabinet-ministers-used-whatsapp-recently-including-amber-rudd-who-accused-the-messaging-service-of-helping-terrorists/Google Scholar

Coleman, W. (2016). Financial Services, Globalization, and Domestic Policy Change. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Connaughton, B. (2010). ‘Glorified gofers, policy experts or good generalists’: A classification of the roles of the Irish ministerial adviser. Irish Political Studies 25(3): 347–69.Google Scholar

Corry, D. (2011). Power at the centre: Is the National Economic Council a new way of organizing things? The Political Quarterly 82(3): 459–68.Google Scholar

Cowie, G., and Sandford, M. (2018, 24 September). Statutory commissions of inquiry: The Inquiries Act 2005. House of Commons Library, Briefing Paper No. SN06410.Google Scholar

Craft, J. (2015a). Conceptualizing partisan advisers as policy workers. Policy Sciences Journal 48(2): 135–58.Google Scholar

Craft, J. (2015b). Revisiting the Gospel: Appointed political staffs and core executive policy coordination. International Journal of Public Administration 38(1): 56–65.Google Scholar

Craft, J. (2016). Backrooms and Beyond: Partisan Advisers and the Politics of Policy Work in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Craft, J. (2017a). Partisan advisers and political policy failure avoidance. Public Administration 95(2): 327–41.Google Scholar

Craft, J. (2017b). Governing on the front foot: The permanent campaign and Canada’s evolving ‘Bargain(s)’. In Marland, A., Giasson, T. and Esselment, A. (eds.), The Permanent Campaign in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 28–46.Google Scholar

Craft, J. (2018). Canada: Flexing the political arm of government. In Shaw, R. and Eichbaum, C. (eds.), Ministers, Minders and Mandarins: An International Study of Relationships at the Executive Summit of Parliamentary Democracies. London: Edward Elgar, pp. 34–52.Google Scholar

Craft, J., and Daku, M. (2017). A comparative assessment of elite policy recruits in Canada. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 19(3): 207–26.Google Scholar

Craft, J., and Howlett, M. (2012). Policy formulation, governance shifts and policy influence: Location and content in policy advisory systems. Journal of Public Policy 32(2): 79–98.Google Scholar

Craft, J., and Howlett, M. (2013). The dual dynamics of policy advisory systems: The impact of externalization and politicization on policy advice. Policy and Society 32(3): 187–97.Google Scholar

Craft, J., and Halligan, J. (2017). Assessing 30 years of Westminster policy advisory system experience. Policy Sciences 50(1): 47–62.Google Scholar

Craft, J., and Wilder, M. (2017). Catching a second wave: Context and compatibility in advisory system dynamics. Policy Studies Journal 45(1): 215–39.Google Scholar

Craft, J., and Wilson, P. (2018). Policy analysis and the central executive. In Dobuzinskis, L. and Howlett, M. (eds.), Policy Analysis in Canada. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 147–64.Google Scholar

Curry, B. (2014, 19 November). Finance Minister Joe Oliver says business tax credit did not require internal analysis. Globe and Mail.Google Scholar

Curry, B., and Silcoff, S. (2017, 13 April). Encourage seniors to delay retirement, growth council tells Morneau. Globe and Mail.Google Scholar

Dahlstrom, C., Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. (eds.). (2011). Steering from the Centre: Strengthening Political Control in Western Democracies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Davies, J. S. (2011). Challenging Governance Theory: From Networks to Hegemony. Bristol: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Davison, N. (2016). Whole of Government Reforms in New Zealand: The Case of the Policy Project. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Delacourt, S. (2019, 19 February). Here’s the downside of concentrating power in the prime minister’s office. Toronto Star.Google Scholar

Dent, H. (2002). Consultants and the public service. Australian Journal of Public Administration 61(1): 108–13.Google Scholar

DIA/Department of Internal Affairs (2018). Different Types of Government Reviews. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs. www.dia.govt.nz/Different-types-of-government-reviews.Google Scholar

Diamond, P. (2014). Governing Britain: Power, Politics and the Prime Minister. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Diamond, P. (2017). The Westminster system under the Cameron coalition: ‘Promiscuous partisanship’ or institutional resilience? Public Policy and Administration 34(3): 1–21.Google Scholar

Diamond, P. (2019). The End of Whitehall? Government by Permanent Campaign. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Di Francesco, M. (2001). Process not outcomes in new public management? Policy coherence in Australian government. Australian Review of Public Affairs 1(3): 103–16.Google Scholar

Di Francesco, M. (2012). Grand designs? The ‘managerial’ role of ministers within Westminster‐based public management policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration 71(3): 257–68.Google Scholar

Dobuzinskis, L. and Howlett, M. (eds.) (2018). Policy Analysis in Canada. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar

Dobuzinskis, L., Howlett, M. and Laycock, D. (eds.) (2007). Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

DPMC/Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (2014). The Policy Project – Responsive Today, Shaping Tomorrow. Wellington: DPMC.Google Scholar

DPMC/Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (2019). APS Policy Capability Roadmap: A Practical Plan to Lift Policy Capability across the AP. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar

Drezner, D. (2014). The system worked: Global economic governance during the Great Recession. World Politics 66(1): 123–64.Google Scholar

Drezner, D. (2018). The Idea Industry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dror, Y. (1984). Policy analysis for advising rulers. In Tomlinson, R. and Kiss, I. (eds.), Rethinking the Process of Operational Research and Systems Analysis. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, P., et al. (2017). Audit 2017: How effective is the Westminster Parliament in scrutinising central government policy-making? www.democraticaudit.com/2017/08/31/audit-2017-how-effective-is-the-westminster-parliament-in-scrutinising-central-government-policy-making/.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, P., Park, A. and Taylor, R. (eds.) (2018). The UK’s Changing Democracy: The 2018 Democratic Audit. London: LSE Press.Google Scholar

Dunn, D. (1997). Politics and Administration at the Top: Lessons from Down Under. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Dunn, W. (1980). The two-communities metaphor and models of knowledge use. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1(4): 515–36.Google Scholar

Dwivedi, O. P., and Gow, J. I. (1999). From Bureaucracy to Public Management: The Administrative Culture of the Government of Canada. Toronto: Broadview Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easton, S. (2018, 4 July). Australian Public Service to start running citizen-satisfaction surveys. The Mandarin. www.themandarin.com.au/95214-australian-public-service-to-start-running-citizen-satisfaction-surveys/.Google Scholar

Edwards, L. (2009). Testing the discourse of declining policy capacity: Rail policy and the Department of Transport. Australian Journal of Public Administration 68(3): 288–302.Google Scholar

Edwards, M., Halligan, J., Horrigan, B. and Nicoll, G. (2012). Public Sector Governance in Australia. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar

Eichbaum, C. (2017, 8 August). Free and frank advice fast disappearing. The Dominion Post.Google Scholar

Eichbaum, C. (2019, 29 July). The 2019 Public Service Reset – tweak or transformation? Presentation notes. Wellington: New Zealand Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar

Eichbaum, C., and Shaw, R. (2007). Ministerial advisers and the politics of policy-making: Bureaucratic permanence and popular control. Australian Journal of Public Administration 66(4): 453–67.Google Scholar

Eichbaum, C., and Shaw, R. (2008). Revisiting politicization: Political advisers and public servants in Westminster systems. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 21(3): 337–63.Google Scholar

Eichbaum, C., and Shaw, R. (2010a). New Zealand. In Eichbaum, C. and Shaw, R. (eds.), Partisan Appointees and Public Servants: An International Analysis of the Role of the Political Adviser. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 114–50.Google Scholar

Eichbaum, C., and Shaw, R. (2010b). Partisan Appointees and Public Servants: An international Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Eichbaum, C., and Shaw, R. (2011). Political staff in executive government: Conceptualising and mapping roles within the core executive. Australia Journal of Political Science 46(4): 583–600.Google Scholar

Eichbaum, C., and Shaw, R. (2017). The future of public administration: Speaking truth to power or fluffing the lines? Paper to the 2017 Conference of the New Zealand Political Studies Association. University of Otago, 29 November–1 December 2017.Google Scholar

Eichbaum, C., and Shaw, R. (2018). The future of public administration: Speaking truth to power or fluffing the lines? Paper for the 2018 IPSA Conference, Borders and Margins, Brisbane, 21–25 July.Google Scholar

Eichbaum, C., and Shaw, R. (2019). Two faces of politicisation: Administrative and functional politicization within the New Zealand core executive. International Conference on Public Policy, Montreal, 26–8 June.Google Scholar

Elgie, R. (1997). Models of executive politics: A framework for the study of executive power relations in parliamentary and semi-presidential regimes. Political Studies 45(2): 217–31.Google Scholar

Elston, T. (2012). Developments in UK executive agencies: Re-examining the ‘disaggregation-reaggregation’ thesis. Public Policy and Administration 28(1): 66–89.Google Scholar

Elston, T. (2014). Not so ‘arm’s length’: Reinterpreting agencies in UK central government. Public Administration 92(2): 458–76.Google Scholar

Emy, H., and Hughes, O. (1991). Australian Politics: Realities in Conflict. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Encel, S. (1960). The concept of the state in Australian politics. Australian Journal of Politics and History 61(1): 62–76.Google Scholar

Esselment, A., Lees-Marshment, J. and Marland, A. (2014). The nature of political advising to prime ministers in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 52(3): 358–75.Google Scholar

Esselment, A., and Wilson, P. (2015). Political staff and the permanent campaign. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association. Ottawa, June 4.Google Scholar

European Commission (2017). Quality of public administration: A toolbox for practitioners. European Union.Google Scholar

Evans, M., Grattan, M. and McCaffrie, B. (eds.) (2019). From Turnbull to Morrison: Australian Commonwealth Administration 2016–2019 – Understanding the Trust Divide. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, M., Halupka, M. and Stoker, G. (2019). Trust and democracy in Australia. In Evans, M., Grattan, M. and McCaffrie, B. (eds.), From Turnbull to Morrison: Australian Commonwealth Administration 2016–2019 – Understanding the Trust Divide. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, pp. 17–35.Google Scholar

Fellegi, I. (1996). Strengthening our Policy Capacity: Report of the Deputy Ministers Task Force. Ottawa: Supply and Service Canada.Google Scholar

Fleischer, J. (2009). Power resources of parliamentary executives: Policy advice in the UK and Germany. West European Politics 32(1): 196–214.Google Scholar

Flinders, M. (2000). Governance in Whitehall. Public Administration 80(1): 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flinders, M. (2002). Shifting the balance? Political Studies 50(1): 23–42.Google Scholar

Flinders, M. (2008). Delegated Governance and the British State: Walking without Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flinders, M., and Buller, J. (2006). Depoliticization: Principles, tactics and tools. British Politics 1(3): 293–318.Google Scholar

Fobe, E., Brans, M., Diederik, V. and Van Damme, J. (2013). Institutionalized advisory systems: An analysis of member satisfaction of advice production and use across 9 strategic advisory councils in Flanders (Belgium). Policy and Society 32(3): 225–40.Google Scholar

Fonberg, R., and Fyfe, T. (2013, 10 September). The critical role of policy advice. Canadian Government Executive.Google Scholar

Foster, C. D. (2001). The civil service under stress: The fall in civil service power and authority. Public Administration 79(3): 725–49.Google Scholar

Fraussen, B., and Halpin, D. (2017). Think tanks and strategic policy-making: The contribution of think tanks to policy advisory systems. Policy Sciences 50(1): 105–24.Google Scholar

Freeguard, G., Cheung, A., Lilly, A., Shepheard, M., Lillis, J., Campbell, L., Haigh, J., Taylor, J. and de Costa, A.. (2019). Whitehall Monitor 2019. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Gains, F., and Stoker, G. (2011). Special advisors and the transmission of ideas from the policy primeval soup. Policy and Politics 39(4): 485–98.Google Scholar

Gleeson, D., Legge, D., O’Neill, D. and Pfeffer, M. (2011). Negotiating tensions in developing organizational policy capacity: Comparative lessons to be drawn. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 13(3): 237–63.Google Scholar

Glenn, T. (2018). Canadian legislatures, public policy and policy analysis. In Dobuzinskis, L. and Howlett, M. (eds.), Policy Analysis in Canada. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 211–32.Google Scholar

Gold, J. (2014). International Delivery: Centres of Government And The Drive For Better Policy Implementation. London: Institute for Government; Toronto: Mowat Centre.Google Scholar

Gold, J. (2017). Tracking Delivery: Global Trends and Warning Signs in Delivery Units. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, E. (2006). The Way It Works: Inside Ottawa. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.Google Scholar

Government of New Zealand. (2018a). Government to reduce reliance on consultants. Wellington. www.beehive.govt.nz/release/government-reduce-reliance-consultants.Google Scholar

Government of New Zealand (2018b). Cabinet Minute: GOV-18-MIN-0030 – Reducing state services agencies’ reliance on purchasing external capability. http://www.ssc.govt.nz/sites/all/files/GOV-18-MIN-0030.pdf.Google Scholar

Gow, J. I. (1994). Learning from Others: Administrative Innovation among Canadian Governments. Toronto: Institute of Public Administration of Canada and the Canadian Centre for Management Development.Google Scholar

Gow, I. (2004). A Canadian Model of Public Administration? Ottawa: Canadian School of Public Service.Google Scholar

Grattan, M. (2019, 27 July). PM attempts to calm the circus. The Canberra Times: 36.Google Scholar

Greenway, A. (2019, 4 September). Officials who fear change should be wary, Civil Service World.Google Scholar

Gregory, R., and Lonti, Z. (2008). Chasing shadows? Performance measurement of policy advice in New Zealand government departments. Public Administration 86(3): 837–56.Google Scholar

Grube, D. (2015). Responsibility to be enthusiastic? Public servants and the public face of ‘promiscuous partisanship’. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 28(3): 305–20.Google Scholar

Grube, D. (2019). Megaphone Bureaucracy: Speaking Truth to Power in the Age of the New Normal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Grube, D., and Howard, C. (2016). Is the Westminster system broken beyond repair? Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 29(4): 467–81.Google Scholar

Gruhn, Z., and Slater, F. (2012). Special Advisers and Ministerial Effectiveness. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Gurr, B. (2019, 24 July). Boris Johnson’s cabinet: Dominic Cummings, brains of Brexit campaign, is hired to make it happen. The Times. www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/boris-johnson-s-cabinet-dominic-cummings-brains-of-brexit-campaign-is-hired-to-make-it-happen-j2sgzgs0l.Google Scholar

Haddon, C. (2016). Developments in the civil service. In Heffernan, R., Hay, C., Russell, M. and Cowley, P. (eds.), Developments in British Politics Ten. 10th ed. London: Palgrave, pp. 161–82.Google Scholar

Haddon, C. (2019). Becoming Prime Minister. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Hall, M., and Marsh, D. (2019, September). Brexit shows both the importance of the British Political Tradition and the extent to which it is under threat. LSE Blogs.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25(3): 275–96.Google Scholar

Halligan, J. (1995). Policy advice and the public sector. In Peters, B. G. and Savoie, D. (eds.), Governance in a Changing Environment. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 138–72.Google Scholar

Halligan, J. (1996). The diffusion of civil service reform. In Bekke, H., Perry, J. L. and Toonen, T. A. J. (eds.), Civil Services in Comparative Perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 288–317.Google Scholar

Halligan, J. (2001). Politicians, bureaucrats and public sector reform in Australia and New Zealand. In Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. (eds.), Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform. London: Routledge, pp. 157–68.Google Scholar

Halligan, J. (2003). Anglo-American civil service systems: Comparative perspectives. In Halligan, J. (ed.), Civil Service Systems in Anglo-American Countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar

Halligan, J. (2006). The reassertion of the centre in a first generation NPM system. In Christensen, T. and Laegreid, P. (eds.), Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 162–80.Google Scholar

Halligan, J. (2007). Reintegrating government in third generation reforms of Australia and New Zealand. Public Policy and Administration 22(2): 217–38.Google Scholar

Halligan, J. (2010). The fate of administrative ttradition in anglophone countries during the reform era. In Painter, M. and Peters, B. G. (eds.), Tradition and Public Administration. London: Palgrave, pp. 129–42.Google Scholar

Halligan, J. (2011). Central steering in Australia. In Dahlström, C., Peters, B.G. and Pierre, J. (eds.), Steering from the Centre: Strengthening Political Control in Western Democracies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 99–122.Google Scholar

Halligan, J. (2013). The evolution of public service bargains of Australian senior public servants. International Review of Administrative Sciences 79(1): 111–29.Google Scholar

Halligan, J. (2015). Anglophone systems: Diffusion and policy transfer within an administrative tradition. In van der Meer, F., Raadschelders, J. and Toonen, T. (eds.), The Civil Service in the 21st century. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 57–76.Google Scholar

Halligan, J. (2016). Mapping the Central State in Australia. Paper for Panel 13 Mapping the State: Old and New Explanatory Perspectives, Research Committee 27, IPSA 2016 World Congress, Poznan, 23–28 July.Google Scholar

Halligan, J. (2019). Nadir or renaissance for the Australian public service? In Evans, M., Grattan, M. and McCaffrie, B. (eds.), From Turnbull to Morrison: Australian Commonwealth Administration 2016–2019 – Understanding the Trust Divide. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, pp. 144–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halligan, J. (2020). Reforming Public Management and Governance: Impact and Lessons from Anglophone Countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Halligan, J., Miller, R. and Power, J. (2007). Parliament in the 21st Century: Institutional Reform and Emerging Roles. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar

Hallsworth, M., Parker, S. and Rutter, J. (2011). Policymaking in the Real World: Evidence and Analysis. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Halligan, J., and Power, J. (1992). Political Management in the 1990s. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Halligan, J., and Reid, R. (2016). Conflict and Consensus in Committees of the Australian Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs 69(2): 230–48.Google Scholar

Halligan, J., and Smith, G. (2019). Intensity of collaboration between Australian government agencies and the effect on program success. Paper for the annual conference of the International Research Society of Public Management, Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington, 16–18 April.Google Scholar

Hamburger, P., Stevens, B. and Weller, P. (2012). A capacity for central coordination: The case of Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Australian Journal of Public Administration 70(4): 377–90.Google Scholar

Hamburger, P., and Weller, P. (2012). Policy advice and a central agency: The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Australian Journal of Political Science 47(3): 363–76.Google Scholar

Hanger, I. (2014). Report of the Royal Commission into the Home Insulation Program. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar

Harris, J., and Rutter, J. (2014). Center Forward: Effective Support for the Prime Minister at the Center of Government. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Hayne, K. M. (2019, 26 July). On Royal Commissions. Address to CCCS Conference, Melbourne Law School.Google Scholar

Hazell, R. (2012). How the coalition works at the centre. In Hazell, R. and Yong, B. (eds.), The Politics of Coalition: How the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Government Works. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 57–76.Google Scholar

Hazell, R., and Yong, B. (eds.) (2012). The Politics of Coalition: How the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition Works. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Head, B. (2015). Policy analysis and public sector capacity. In Head, B. and Crowley, K. (eds.), Policy Analysis in Australia. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 53–67.Google Scholar

Head, B. (2017). Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges. Policy and Society 29(2): 77–94.Google Scholar

Head, B., and Crowley, K. (eds.) (2015). Policy Analysis in Australia. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar

Heady, B. (1974). British Cabinet Ministers. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Hernando, M., Hartwig, P. and Stone, D.. (2018). Think tanks in ‘hard times’ – the Global Financial Crisis and economic advice. Policy and Society 37(2): 125–39.Google Scholar

HC CPA/House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts (2016a). Accountability to Parliament for Taxpayers’ Money. HC 732. Thirty-ninth Report of Session 2015–16. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

HC CPA/House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts (2016b). Oral Evidence: Accountability to Parliament for Taxpayers’ Money. HC 732. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

HC CPA/House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts (2016c, 23 November). Managing Government Spending and Expenditure. HC 710. Twenty-seventh Report of Session 2016–17. London: London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

HC PAC/House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee (2005). Government by Inquiry. HC 51-I. First Report of Session 2004–05. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

Heintzman, R. (1997). Canada and public administration. In Bourgault, J., Demers, M. and Williams, C. (eds.), Public Administration and Public Management Experiences in Canada. Sainte-Foy: Les Publications du Quebec, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Henry, K. (2007, 14 March). Treasury’s effectiveness in the current environment. Address to Treasury staff.Google Scholar

Hindmoor, A., Larkin, P. and Kennon, A. (2009). Assessing the influence of select committees in the UK: The Education and Skills Committee, 1997–2005, Journal of Legislative Studies 15: 71–89.Google Scholar

Hipkins, C. (Minister of State Services) (2019). Cabinet Paper: Public Service Legislation: Paper 2 – A Unified Public Service. Wellington. https://ssc.govt.nz/assets/Legacy/resources/Paper-2-A-Unified-Public-Service.pdf.Google Scholar

Hird, J. A. (ed.) (2018). Policy analysis in the United States. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar

HM Government (2011). Open Public Services White Paper. CM 8145. London: HM Government.Google Scholar

HM Government (2012, June). The Civil Service Reform Plan. London: HM Government.Google Scholar

HM Government (2013). Civil service reform plan: One year on report. http://my.civilservice.gov.uk/reform/civil-service-reform-one-year-on/.Google Scholar

HM Government (2014). The Civil Service Reform Plan: Progress Report. London: HM Government.Google Scholar

Höchtl, J., Parycek, P. and Schöllhammer, R. (2016). Big data in the policy cycle: Policy decision making in the digital era. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 26: 1–2, 147–69.Google Scholar

Hodgetts, J. E. (1983). Implicit values in the administration of public affairs. In Kernaghan, K. (ed.), Canadian Public Administration: Discipline and Profession. Toronto: Butterworths pp. 29–41.Google Scholar

Holland, I. (2009). Senate Committees and Legislative Process. Parliamentary Studies Paper 7. Canberra: Parliamentary Studies Centre, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Hood, C. (2010). The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hoole, G. (2014). Commissions of inquiry in Canada. In Prasser, S. and Tracey, H. (eds.), Royal Commissions and Public Inquiries: Practice and Potential. Ballarat: Connorcourt Publishing, pp. 331–55.Google Scholar

Howard, M. (2017). Submission #54 to Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit Inquiry Based on ANAO Report No 19, 2017–18. Canberra: Australian Government Procurement Contract Reporting.Google Scholar

Howlett, M. (2009). Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences 42(1): 73–89.Google Scholar

Howlett, M., and Lindquist, E. (2004). Policy analysis and governance: Analytical and policy styles in Canada. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 6(3): 225–49.Google Scholar

Howlett, M., and Migone, A. (2013a). Policy advice through the market: The role of external consultants in contemporary policy advisory systems. Policy and Society 32(3): 241–54.Google Scholar

Howlett, M., and Migone, A. (2013b). The permanence of temporary services: The reliance of Canadian federal departments on policy and management consultants. Canadian Public Administration 56(3): 369–90.Google Scholar

Howlett, M., and Migone, A. (2014a). Making the invisible public service visible? Exploring data on the supply of policy and management consultancies in Canada. Canadian Public Administration 57(2): 183–216.Google Scholar

Howlett, M., Migone, A. and Tan, S. L.. (2014b). Duplicative or complementary? The relationship between policy consulting and internal policy analysis in Canadian government. Canadian Journal of Political Science 47(1): 113–34.Google Scholar

Howlett, M., and Wellstead, A. M. (2011). Policy analysts in the bureaucracy revisited: The nature of professional policy work in contemporary government. Politics & Policy 39(4): 613–33.Google Scholar

Howlett, M., Wellstead, A. and Craft, J. (eds.) (2017). Policy Work in Canada: Professional Practices and Analytical Capacities. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Hunn, D., and Lang, H. G. (1989). Review of the Prime Minister’s Office and Cabinet Office. Wellington: State Services Commission.Google Scholar

Hustedt, T. (2019). Studying policy advisory systems: Beyond the Westminster-bias? Policy Studies. DOI:10.1080/01442872.2018.1557627.Google Scholar

Hustedt, T., and Veit, S. (2017). Policy advisory systems: Change dynamics and sources of variation. Policy Sciences 50(1): 41–6.Google Scholar

Independent Review of the APS (2019). Independent Review of the APS: Priorities for Change. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar

Institute for Government (2016). Ministers reflect: Ian Duncan Smith. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/ministers-reflect/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Iain-Duncan-Smith.pdf.Google Scholar

Inwood, G. J. (2005). Continentalizing Canada: The Politics and Legacy of the Macdonald Royal Commission. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Inwood, G., and Johns, C. (eds.) (2014). Commissions of Inquiry and Policy Change: A Comparative Analysis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Inwood, G., and Johns, C. (2016). Commissions of inquiry and policy change: Comparative analysis and future research frontiers. Canadian Public Administration 50(3): 382–404.Google Scholar

Inwood, G., and Johns, C. (2018). Commissions of Inquiry and Policy Analysis. In Dobuzinskis, L. and Howlett, M. (eds.), Policy Analysis in Canada. 2nd ed. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 233–54.Google Scholar

Inwood, G. J., Johns, C. M. and O’Reilly, P. L. (2012). Intergovernmental Policy Capacity in Canada: Inside the Worlds of Finance, Environment, Trade, and Health. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

IPAA/Institute of Public Administration Australia (2012, April). Public policy drift: An IPAA policy paper.Google Scholar

IRPP (2018, 27 February). Government of Canada announces major contribution to the IRPP to create a centre of excellence on the Canadian federation. News release. http://irpp.org/news-release/government-canada-announces-major-contribution-irpp-create-centre-excellence-canadian-federation/.Google Scholar

James, O., and Nakamura, A. (2014). Coordination in UK central government. In Lægreid, P., Sarapuu, K., Rykkja, L. and Randma-Liiv, T. (eds.), Organizing for Coordination in the Public Sector: Practices and Lessons from 12 European Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 91–102.Google Scholar

Jeffrey, B. (2010). Divided Loyalties: The Liberal Party of Canada, 1984–2008. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Jensen, K., Scott, R., Slocombe, L., Body, R. and Cowey, L. (2014). The management and organisational challenges of more joined-up government: New Zealand’s better public services reforms. State Sector Performance Hub, Working Paper, 2014–1. Wellington: New Zealand Government.Google Scholar

Jervis, R. (1997). System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Johnstone, R. (2019, 25 July). Permanent civil service ‘an idea for the history books’: New No.10 adviser Dominic Cummings’ views on Whitehall. Civil Service World. www.civilserviceworld.com/articles/news/permanent-civil-service-%E2%80%98-idea-history-books%E2%80%99-new-no10-adviser-dominic-cummings-views.Google Scholar

Jones, C. M., and Inwood, G. J. (2018). Commission of inquiry and policy analysis. In Dobuzinskis, L. and Howlett, M. (eds.), Policy Analysis in Canada. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 233–54.Google Scholar

Jones, G. (2016). The Power of the Prime Minister: 50 Years On. Research Paper. London: The Constitution Society.Google Scholar

Kavanagh, D., and Richards, D. (2001). Departmentalism and joined-up government. Parliamentary Affairs 54(1): 1–18.Google Scholar

Kay, A., and Daugbjerg, C. (2015). De-institutionalising governance? Instrument diversity and feedback dynamics. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 37(4): 236–46.Google Scholar

Keep, M. (2018, 13 July). Office for Budget Responsibility, Briefing Paper, Number CBP 5657, House of Commons Library.Google Scholar

Kellner, P., and Crowther-Hunt, N. (1980). The Civil Servants: An Inquiry into Britain’s Ruling Class. London: Macdonald.Google Scholar

Kemp, D. (1986). The recent evolution of central policy control mechanisms in parliamentary systems. International Political Science Review 7(1): 56–66.Google Scholar

Kibblewhite, A. (2015, 26 May). Great policy: Responsive today, shaping tomorrow. Address to IPANZ.Google Scholar

Kibblewhite, A. (2018a). The New Zealand Policy Project: Reflections on the first three years. Civil Service Quarterly 16. https://dpmc.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2018-04/UK%20Civil%20Service%20Quarterly_1.pdf.Google Scholar

Kibblewhite, A. (2018b, 18 December). The future of the policy profession. Speech at Policy Managers Forum, Wellington.Google Scholar

Kibblewhite, A., and Boshier, P. (2018). Free and frank advice and the Official Information Act: Balancing competing principles of good government. Policy Quarterly 14(2): 3–9.Google Scholar

King, A., and Crewe, I. (2014). The Blunders of our Governments. London: Oneworld.Google Scholar

Kingston, A. (2017, 12 October). Inside the ‘progressive’ think tank that really runs Canada. Maclean’s. www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/inside-the-progressive-think-tank-that-really-runs-canada/.Google Scholar

Kinne, Brandon. (2013). Network Dynamics and the Evolution of International Cooperation. American Political Science Review 107(4): 766–85.Google Scholar

Kirby, M., and Segal, H. (2016). A House Undivided: Making Senate Independence Work. A Public Policy Forum report. Ottawa: Public Policy Forum.Google Scholar

Knill, C. (1999). Explaining cross-national variance in administrative reform: Autonomous versus instrumental bureaucracies. Journal of Public Policy 19(2): 113–39.Google Scholar

Lægreid, P., and Rykkja, L. H.. (2016). Administrative reform in the Nordic countries – processes, trends and content. In Creve, C., Lægreid, P. and Rykkja, L. H. (eds.), Nordic Administrative Reforms: Lessons for Public Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 105–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lægreid, P., Randma-Liiv, T., Rykkja, L. H. and Sarapuu, K. (2016). Coordination challenges and administrative reforms. In Hammerschmid, G., Van de Walle, S., Andrews, R. and Bezes, P., Public Administration in Europe: The View from the Top. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 244–58.Google Scholar

Lawlor, A., and Crandall, E. (2013). Committee performance in the Senate of Canada: Some sobering analysis for the chamber of ‘sober second thought’. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 51(4): 549–68.Google Scholar

Lee, J. M., Jones, G. W. and Burnham, J. (1998). At the Centre of Whitehall: Advising the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Leifeld, P., and Schneider, V. (2012). Information exchange in policy networks. American Journal of Political Science 56(3): 731–44.Google Scholar

Levitt, R., and Solesbury, W. (2012). Policy Tsars: Here to Stay but More Transparency Needed: Final Report. London: Kings College.Google Scholar

Levitt, R., and Solesbury, W. (2013a). New development: Policy tsars – Whitehall’s expert advisers revealed. Public Money and Management 33(1): 77–80.Google Scholar

Levitt, R., and Solesbury, B. (2013b). Open policy making: don’t tsars count? Manchester Policy Blogs: Whitehall Watch. http://blog.policy.manchester.ac.uk/whitehallwatch/2013/10/open-policy-making-dont-tsars-count/ (accessed 6 November 2018).Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lindquist, E. (1998). A quarter century of Canadian think tanks: Evolving institutions, conditions and strategies. In Stone, D., Denham, A. and Garnett, M. (eds.), Think Tanks across Nations: A Comparative Approach. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 127–44.Google Scholar

Lindquist, E. (2006a). Organizing for policy implementation: The emergence and role of implementation units in policy design and oversight. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 8(4): 311–24.Google Scholar

Lindquist, E. (2006b). Organizing for policy implementation: Comparisons, lessons and prospects for cabinet implementation units. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 8(4): 421–35.Google Scholar

Lindquist, E. (2006c). A Critical Moment: Capturing and Conveying the Evolution of the Canadian Public Service. Ottawa: Canadian School of Public Service.Google Scholar

Lindquist, E. A. (2014). The responsiveness solution? Embedding horizontal governance in Canada. In O’Flynn, J., Blackman, D. and Halligan, J. (eds.), Crossing Boundaries in Public Management and Policy: The International Experience. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 190–210.Google Scholar

Lindquist, E., and Eichbaum, C. (2016). Remaking Government in Canada: Dares, Resilience, and Civility in Westminster Systems. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 29(4): 553–71.Google Scholar

Lindquist, E., and Tiernan, A.. (2011). The Australian public service and policy advising: Meeting the challenges of 21st century governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration 70(4): 437–50.Google Scholar

Lindvall, J. (2009). The real but limited influence of expert ideas. World Politics 61(4): 703–30.Google Scholar

Littoz-Monnet, A. (2017). The Politics of Expertise in International Organizations: How International Bureaucracies Produce and Mobilize Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lloyd, L. (2019). The Brexit Effect: How Government Has Changed since the EU Referendum. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Lodge, G., and Rogers, B. (2006). Whitehall’s Black Box: Accountability and Performance in the Senior Civil Service. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar

Lodge, M. (2010). Public service bargains in British central government: Multiplication, diversification and reassertion? In Painter, M. and Peters, B. G. (eds.), Tradition and Public Administration. London: Palgrave, pp. 99–113.Google Scholar

Lodge, M., and Gill, D. (2011). Toward a new era of administrative reform? The myth of post-NPM in New Zealand. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 24(1): 141–66.Google Scholar

Lodge, M., and Wegrich, K. (2014). The Problem-Solving Capacity of the Modern State: Governance Challenges and Administrative Capacities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

LSE GV314 Group (2012). New life at the top: Special advisers in British government. Parliamentary Affairs 65(4): 715–32.Google Scholar

Luetjens, J., Mintrom, M., and `t Hart, P.. (2019). Successful Public Policy: Lessons from Australia and New Zealand. Australian National University/Australia New Zealand School of Public Service.Google Scholar

MAC/Management Advisory Committee (2004). Connecting Government: Whole of Government Responses to Australia’s Priority Challenges. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar

May, Peter J. (1991). Reconsidering Policy Design: Policies and Publics. Journal of Public Policy 11(2): 187–206.Google Scholar

McBride, S., and Merolli, J. (2013). Alternatives to austerity? Post-crisis policy advice from global institutions. Global Social Policy 13(3): 299–320.Google Scholar

McConnell, A. (2010). Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

McCrae, J., and Gold, J. (2017). Professionalising Whitehall. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

McCrae, J., Harris, J. and Andrews, E. (2015). All in it together: Cross-departmental responsibilities for improving Whitehall. Institute for Government after the Election. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/All%20in%20it%20together.pdf.Google Scholar

MacDermott, K. (2008). Whatever Happened to ‘Frank’ and ‘Fearless’? The Impact of New Public Management on the Public Service. Canberra: ANU E Press.Google Scholar

Macdonald, D. (2011). The Shadow Public Service: The Swelling Ranks of Federal Government Outsourced Workers. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.Google Scholar

McGann, M., Blomkamp, E. and Lewis, J. M. (2018) The rise of public sector innovation labs: Experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sciences 51: 249–67.Google Scholar

McGann, M., Lewis, J. M. and Blomkamp, E. (2018). Mapping Public Sector Innovation Units in Australia and New Zealand: 2018 Survey Report. Melbourne: The Policy Lab, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

McIlroy, T. (2017, 25 August). Infrastructure boss Mike Mrdak lashes prime minister and cabinet and prime ministers’ office. The Canberra Times.Google Scholar

McLeay, E. (1995). The Cabinet and Political Power in New Zealand. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McLevey, J. (2014). Think tanks, funding, and the politics of policy knowledge in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology 51(1): 54–75.Google Scholar

Maer, L., and McCaffrey, R. (2018). Special advisers. Briefing Paper, No 3018. House of Commons Library.Google Scholar

Maley, M. (2000). Conceptualising advisers’ policy work: The distinctive policy roles of ministerial advisers in the Keating government, 1991–96. Australian Journal of Political Science 35(3): 449–70.Google Scholar

Maley, M. (2010). Australia. In Eichbaum, C. and Shaw, R. (eds.), Partisan Appointees and Public Servants: An International Analysis of the Role of the Political Adviser. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 94–113.Google Scholar

Maley, M. (2011). Strategic links in a cut-throat world: Rethinking the role and relationships of Australian ministerial staff. Public Administration 89(4): 1469–88.Google Scholar

Maley, M. (2015). The policy work of Australian political staff. International Journal of Public Administration 38(1): 46–55.Google Scholar

Maley, M. (2018a). Understanding the divergent development of the ministerial office in Australia and the UK. Australian Journal of Political Science 53(3): 320–35. DOI:10.1080/10361146.2018.1450356.Google Scholar

Maley, M. (2018b). Australia: Applying an institutional lens to political staff. In Shaw, R. and Eichbaum, C. (eds.), Ministers, Minders and Mandarins: An International Study of Relationships at the Executive Summit of Parliamentary Democracies, London: Edward Elgar, pp. 15–33.Google Scholar

Maley, M. (2019). Border crossings: The employment of public servants in ministers’ offices in Australia. International Conference on Public Policy, Montreal, 26–28 June.Google Scholar

Manson, A., and Mullan, D. (eds.) (2003a). Commission of Inquiry: Praise or Reappraise? Toronto: Irwin Law.Google Scholar

Manson, A., and Mullan, D. (2003b). Introduction. In Manson, A. and Mullan, D. (eds.), Commission of Inquiry: Praise or Reappraise? Toronto: Irwin Law, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

Manzoni, J. (2018, 1 May). A civil service fit for the future. Presentation to the Institute for Government, London, video. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/events/civil-service-fit-future.Google Scholar

Marando, D., and Craft, J. (2017). Digital era policy advising: Clouding ministerial perspectives? Canadian Journal of Public Administration 60(4): 498–516.Google Scholar

March, D., Toke, D., Befrage, C., Tepe, D. and McGough, S. (2009). Policy networks and the distinction between insider and outsider groups: The case of the countryside alliance. Public Administration 87(3): 621–38.Google Scholar

Marland, A., Giasson, T. and Esselment, A. (eds.) (2018). Permanent Campaigning in Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

Marsh, D., Richards, D. and Smith, M. J. (2001). Changing Patterns of Governance in the United Kingdom: Reinventing Whitehall? Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Marsh, I., and Stone, D. (2004). Australian think tanks. In Stone, D. and Denham, A. (eds.), Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 247–63.Google Scholar

Massola, J. (2016, 12 October). Malcolm Turnbull and senior cabinet ministers using WhatsApp could pose security risk: experts. Sydney Morning Herald. www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/malcolm-turnbull-and-senior-cabinet-ministers-using-whatsapp-could-pose-security-risk-experts-20161012-gs0cuj.html.Google Scholar

Matthews, F. (2013). Complexity, Fragmentation, and Uncertainty: Government Capacity in an Evolving State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

May, K. (2016a, 7 March). Perception of politicization of the public service is a problem for Liberals. Ottawa Citizen. https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/perception-of-policitization-of-the-public-service-is-a-problem-for-liberals.Google Scholar

May, K. (2016b, 25 March). PS needs to pick up pace of reforms: Privy council clerk. Ottawa Citizen. https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/ps-needs-to-pick-up-pace-of-reforms-privy-council-clerk.Google Scholar

May, P., Koski, C. and Stramp, C. (2016). Issue expertise in policymaking. Journal of Public Policy 36(2): 195–218.Google Scholar

Meltsner, A. (1975). Bureaucratic policy analysts. Policy Analysis 1(1): 115–31.Google Scholar

Mendes, P. (2003). Australian neoliberal think tanks and the backlash against the welfare state. Journal of Australian Political Economy 51: 29–56.Google Scholar

Mintrom, M., and Luetjens, J. (2016). Design thinking in policymaking processes: Opportunities and challenges. Australian Journal of Public Administration 75(3): 391–402.Google Scholar

Monk, D. (2012). Committee inquiries in the Australian parliament and their influence on government: Government acceptance of recommendations as a measure of parliamentary performance. Journal of Legislative Studies 18: 137–60.Google Scholar

Montpetit, É. (2011). Between detachment and responsiveness: Civil servants in Europe and North America. West European Politics 34(6): 1250–71.Google Scholar

Morrison, A. (2014). Picking up the pace in public services. Policy Quarterly 10(2): 43–8.Google Scholar

Morrison, S. (2019). Speech. Institute of Public Administration, Canberra: Parliament House.Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P., and Soss, J. (2014). Policy feedback and the politics of administration. Public Administration Review 74(3): 320–32.Google Scholar

Mulgan, G. (2014). Making Open Government Work. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mulgan, R. (1997). Politics in New Zealand. 2nd ed. Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar

Mulgan, R. (2007). Truth in government and the politicization of public service advice. Public Administration 85(3): 569–86.Google Scholar

NAO/National Audit Office (2015). The Centre of Government: An Update. HC 1031. Session 2014–15. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar

Ng, Y. (2018). The Rise of Political Advisors in the Westminster System. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Norman, R. (2008). At the centre or in control? Central agencies in search of new identities. Policy Quarterly 4(2): 33–8.Google Scholar

Norris, E., and Shepheard, M. (2017). How Public Inquiries Can Lead to Change. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Norton, P. (2005). Parliament in British Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

OECD/Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2007). Political Advisers and Civil Servants in European Countries. Sigma papers, No. 38. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

OECD/Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2011). Ministerial Advisors: Role, Influence and Management. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

OECD/Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2015). Country notes: United Kingdom. Journal on Budgeting 15(2): 241–6.Google Scholar

OECD/Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2017). Policy Advisory System Supporting Good Governance and Sound Public Decision Making. OECD Public Governance Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264283664-en.Google Scholar

O’Flynn, J., Blackman, D. and Halligan, J. (eds.) (2014). Crossing Boundaries in Public Management and Policy: The International Experience. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Osborne, S. (2010). The (new) public governance: A suitable case for treatment? In Osbourne, S. (ed.), The New Public Governance. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Owen, J., and Lloyd, L.. (2018). Costing Brexit: What Is Whitehall Spending on Exiting the EU? London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Page, E., and Jenkins, B. (2005). Policy Bureaucracy: Government with a Cast of Thousands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Page, E., and Wright, V. (eds.) (2007). From the Active to the Enabling State: The Changing Role of Top Officials in European Nations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Page, K. (2015). Unaccountable: Truth and Lies on Parliament Hill. Toronto: Penguin.Google Scholar

Painter, M., and Pierre, J. (eds.) (2005). Challenges to State Policy Capacity Global Trends and Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Painter, M., and Peters, B. G. (2010a). The analysis of administrative tradition. In Painter, M. and Peters, B. G. (eds.), Tradition and Public Administration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar

Pal, L. (2012). Frontiers of Governance: The OECD and Global Public Management Reform. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Palmer, G., and Butler, A. (2016). A Constitution for Aotearoa New Zealand. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar

Palmer, G., and M. Palmer (2004). Bridled Power: New Zealand’s Constitution and Government. 4th ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Parliament of Australia (2018). Royal Commissions and Commissions of Inquiry. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/Browse_by_Topic/law/royalcommissions.Google Scholar

Parker, G. (2008, 21 May). Policy Exchange powers party’s ‘liberal revolution’. Financial Times, 4.Google Scholar

Parker, S., Paun, A., McClory, J. and Blatchford, K. (2010). Shaping Up: A Whitehall for the Future. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Parkhurst, J. (2017). The Politics of Evidence: From Evidence-Based Policy to the Good Governance of Evidence. Routledge Studies in Governance and Public Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Parkinson, M. (2018, 19 October). Brexit, multilateralism and how the media impacts policy work. Mandarin. www.themandarin.com.au/100211-dr-martin-parkinson-brexit-multilateralism-and-how-the-media-impacts-policy-work/?utm_campaign=TheJuice&utm_medium=email&utm?newsletterwork/utm_campaign=TheJuice&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter.Google Scholar

Parsons, W. (2003). Modernising policy-making for the twenty-first century: The professional model. In Butcher, T. and Massey, A. (eds.), Modernizing Civil Services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 147–84.Google Scholar

Parsons, W. (2004). Not just steering but weaving: Relevant knowledge and the craft of building policy capacity and coherence. Australian Journal of Public Administration 63(1): 43–57.Google Scholar

Patapan, H., Wanna, J. and Weller, P. (2005). Westminster Legacies: Democracy and Responsible Government in Asia and the Pacific. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar

Patrick, A. (2016). Credlin & Co: How the Abbott Government Destroyed Itself. Carlton: Black Inc.Google Scholar

Paun, A. (2010). United We Stand: Coalition Government in the UK. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Paun, A. (2013). Supporting Ministers to Lead. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Paun, A., and Blatchford, K. (2014). The performance target solution? Cross-cutting public service agreements in the United Kingdom. In O’Flynn, J., Blackman, D. and Halligan, J. (eds.), Crossing Boundaries in Public Management and Policy: The International Experience. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pautz, H. (2012). The think tanks behind ‘Cameronism’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15(3): 362–77.Google Scholar

Payne, S., and Parker, G. (2020, February 13). Sajid Javid resigns as UK chancellor of the exchequer. Financial Times. www.ft.com/content/a15c78ec-4e3f-11ea-95a0-43d18ec715f5 (subscription required).Google Scholar

Peck, J., and Theodore, N. (2015). Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft and the Thresholds of Neoliberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Percival, S. (2018, 29 March). A policy community for the federal public service and beyond. Policy Options.Google Scholar

Perl, A., Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M. (2018). Policymaking and truthiness: Can existing policy models cope with politicized evidence and wilful ignorance in a ‘postfact’ world? Policy Sciences 51: 581–600.Google Scholar

Perl, A., and White, D. J. (2002). The changing role of consultants in Canadian policy analysis. Policy & Society 21(1): 49–73.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (1996). The Policy Capacity of Government. Research Paper No. 18. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (2003). Administrative traditions and the Anglo-American democracies. In Halligan, J. (ed.), Civil Service Systems in Anglo-American Countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (2011). Governance responses to the fiscal crisis—comparative perspectives. Public Money & Management 31(1): 75–80. DOI:10.1080/09540962.2011.545551.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (2015). Pursuing Horizontal Coordination: The Politics of Public Sector Coordination. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G., and Barker, A.. (1993). Advising West European Governments: Inquiries, Expertise and Public Policy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G., and Pierre, J.. (2004). Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G., and Savoie, D. (2000). Governance in the Twenty-First Century: Revitalizing the Public Service. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Phipps, D., and Morton, S. (2013). Qualities of Knowledge Brokers: Reflections from Practice. Evidence and Policy 9(2): 255–65.Google Scholar

Pierre, J. (1995). Conclusions: A framework of comparative public administration. In Pierre, J. (ed.), Bureaucracy in the Modern State: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 205–18.Google Scholar

Pierre, J. (1998). Public consultation and citizen participation: Dilemmas of policy advice. In Guy Peters, B. and Savoie, Donald J. (eds.), Taking Stock: Assessing Public Sector Reforms. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 137–63.Google Scholar

Platt, B. (2019, 18 March). Privy Council Clerk Michael Wernick resigns after controversy over SNC-Lavalin testimony. National Post.Google Scholar

Plowden, W. (ed.) (1987). Advising the Rulers. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Podger, A. (2007). What really happens: Departmental secretary appointments, contracts and performance pay in the Australian Public Service. Australian Journal of Public Administration 66(2): 131–47.Google Scholar

Podger, A. (2019, 10 September). Protecting and nurturing the role and capability of the Australian Public Service. Parliamentary Library Lecture.Google Scholar

Policy Horizons Canada (2016). Canada 2030: Scan of Emerging Issues – Governance. www.horizons.gc.ca/en/content/canada-2030-scan-emerging-issues-government-2030.Google Scholar

Policy Profession Board (2019). Looking Back to Look Forward: From ‘Twelve Actions’ to ‘Policy Profession 2025’. London: Policy Profession, UK Government.Google Scholar

Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Pollitt, C. (2007). New Labour’s re-disorganisation: Hyper-modernism and the costs of reform – a cautionary tale. Public Management Review 9(4): 529–43.Google Scholar

Pollitt, C. (ed.) (2013). Context in Public Policy and Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Pollitt, C. (2016). Managerialism redux? Financial Accountability and Management 32(4): 429–47.Google Scholar

Pollitt, C., and Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pollitt, C., and Talbot, C. (eds.) (2004). Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Power, M. (2005). The theory of the audit explosion. In Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. and Pollitt, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 326–44.Google Scholar

Pralle, S. (2006). The ‘mouse that roared’: Agenda setting in Canadian pesticides politics. Policy Studies 34(2): 171–94.Google Scholar

Prasser, S. (2006). Royal Commissions and Public Inquiries in Australia. Chatswood: LexisNexis Butterworths.Google Scholar

Prasser, S., and Tracey, H. (2014a). Introduction. In Prasser, S. and Tracey, H. (eds.), Royal Commissions and Public Inquiries: Practice and Potential. Ballarat: Connorcourt, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar

Prasser, S., and Tracey, H. (eds.) (2014b). Royal Commissions and Public Inquiries: Practice and Potential. Ballarat: Connorcourt.Google Scholar

Priddy, S. (2018). Commons select committee chairs in the 2017 parliament. Number CBP04400, House of Commons Library.Google Scholar

Prince, M. J. (1983). Policy Advice and Organizational Survival. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar

Prince, M. J. (2007). Soft craft, hard choices, altered context: Reflections on twenty-five years of policy advice in Canada. In Dobuzinskis, L., Howlett, M. and Laycock, D. (eds.), Policy Analysis in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 163–85.Google Scholar

Prince, M. J. (2018). Trends and directions in Canadian policy analysis and advice. In Dobuzinskis, L. and Howlett, M. (eds.), Policy Analysis in Canada. Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 449–65.Google Scholar

Privy Council Office (2015). Open and Accountable Government. https://pm.gc.ca/sites/pm/files/inline-files/oag_2015_english.pdf.Google Scholar

Privy Council Office (2018). About commission of inquiry. www.canada.ca/en/privy-council/services/commissions-inquiry/about.html (accessed 20 November 2018).Google Scholar

Productivity Commission (2017). Shifting the Dial: 5 Year Productivity Review.Inquiry Report No. 84. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar

Public Service Commission (2010) Use of Temporary Help Services in Public Service Organizations. Ottawa: Public Service Commission.Google Scholar

Radin, B. A. (2000). Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Radwanski, A. (2016, 9 January). All Pearson, no Pierre: Inside Trudeau’s inner circle. Globe and Mail.Google Scholar

Results and Delivery Unit, Privy Council Office (2016). Results and delivery in Canada: Building the culture and the systems. Presentation, Government of Canada.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. W. (2011). Everyday Life in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. W. (2014). Core executives, prime ministers, statecraft and court politics: Towards convergence. In Davis, G. and Rhodes, R. A. W. (eds.), The Craft of Governing: Essays in Honour of Professor Patrick Weller. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin pp. 53–72.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. W. (2015). Recovering the Craft of Public Administration. Public Administration Review 76(4): 638–47.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. W., and Weller, P. (2001). Changing World of Top Officials: Mandarins or Valets? Buckingham: Open University.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. W., and Tiernan, A. (2014a). The Gate Keepers: Lessons from Prime Ministers’ Chiefs of Staff. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. W., and Tiernan, A. (2014b). Lessons in Governing: A Profile of Prime Ministers’ Chiefs of Staff. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. W., and Wanna, J. (2007). The limits to public value, or rescuing responsible government from the platonic guardians. Australian Journal of Public Administration 66(4): 406–21.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. W., Wanna, J. and Weller, P. (2009). Comparing Westminster. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. W., and Weller, P. (2001). The Changing World of Top Officials: Mandarins or Valets? London: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Richards, D. (1997). The Civil Service under the Conservatives 1979–1997: Whitehall’s Political Poodles. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar

Richards, D. (2008). New Labour and the Civil Service: Reconstituting the Westminster Model. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Richards, D., and Smith, M. (2002). Governance and Public Policy in the United Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Richards, D., and Smith, M. (2006). Central control and policy implementation in the UK: A case study of the Prime Minister’s Delivery Unit. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 8(4): 325–45.Google Scholar

Richards, D., and Smith, M. (2016). The Westminster model and the ‘indivisibility of the political and administrative elite’: A convenient myth whose time is up? Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 29(4): 499–516.Google Scholar

Richardson, J. (2018). British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Riddell, P. (2019). 15 Minutes of Power: The Uncertain Life of British Ministers. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar

Riddell, P., and Barlow, P. (2013). The Lost World of Royal Commissions. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Riddell, P., and Haddon, C. (2009). Transitions: Preparing for Government Changes. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Roberts, J. (1987). Politicians, Public Servants and Public Enterprise. Wellington: Victoria University Press for the Institute of Policy Studies.Google Scholar

Robertson, G. (2018, 15 February). Minister of Finance speech to the Institute of Public Administration, New Zealand.Google Scholar

Robson, J., and Wilson, R. P. (2018). Political staff and public servants: Still getting along. In Marland, A., Giasson, T. and Lawlor, A. (eds.), Political Elites in Canada: Power and Influence in Instantaneous Times. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, pp. 71–88.Google Scholar

Rouban, L. (2012). Politicization of the civil service. In Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J., Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage, pp. 380–91.Google Scholar

Rouban, L. (2014). Political–administrative relations: Evolving models of politicization. In Van der Meer, F. M., Raadschelders, J. C. N. and Toonen, T. A. J. (eds.), Comparative Civil Service Systems in the 21st Century: Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 317–33.Google Scholar

RSS/Royal Statistical Society (2016). Putting Evidence at the Heart of the Policy Debate. London: RSS.Google Scholar

Rudd, K. (2008, 30 April). Address to heads of agencies and members of the senior executive service. Great Hall, Parliament House, Canberra.Google Scholar

Russell, M. (2015, December 4). The policy power of the Westminster Parliament: The empirical evidence. UK Constitutional Law Blog. https://constitution-unit.com/2015/11/26/the-policy-power-of-the-westminster-parliament-the-empirical-evidence/.Google Scholar

Russell, M., and Benton, M. (2011). Selective Influence: The Policy Impact of House of Commons Select Committees. London: The Constitution Unit, UCL.Google Scholar

Russell, M., and Crowley, P. (2016). The policy power of the Westminster Parliament: The ‘parliamentary state’ and the empirical evidence. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 29(1): 121–37.Google Scholar

Rutter, J. (2013). A better formula: Will civil service reform improve Whitehall’s use of expert advice. In Doubleday, R. and Wilsdon, J. (eds.), Future Directions for Scientific Advice in Whitehall. Cambridge: Centre for Science and Policy, University of Cambridge and four other partners, pp. 39–48.Google Scholar

Rutter, J. (2019). Will civil service impartiality be a casuality of Brexit? In Barwick, S. (ed.), Impartiality Matters: Perspectives on the Importance of Impartiality in the Civil Service in a ‘Post Truth’ World. London: Smith Institute, pp. 57–62.Google Scholar

Rutter, J., Marshall, E. and Sims, S. (2012). The ‘S’ Factors: Lessons from IfG’s Policy Success Sessions. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Rutter, T. (2018, 10 January). Unions: Ministerial code ‘tinkering’ not enough to protect civil servants from harassment. Civil Service World.Google Scholar

Saint-Martin, D. (1998). The new managerialism and the policy influence of consultants in government: An historical-institutionalist analysis of Britain, Canada and France. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 11(3): 319–56.Google Scholar

Saint-Martin, D. (2004). Building the New Managerialist State: Consultants and the Politics of Public Sector Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Salacuse, J. (2018). Advice in government and policy making. In MacGeorge, E. and Van Swol, L. M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Advice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 321–42.Google Scholar

Salter, L. (2007). The public of public enquiries. In Dobuzinskis, L., Howlett, M. and Laycock, D. (eds.), Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 291–313.Google Scholar

Samojlenko, D., and Boots, S. (2018). Getting prototypes out the door: The e-briefing app. Canadian Digital Service/Service numérique Canadian. https://digital.canada.ca/2018/01/29/getting-prototypes-out-the-door/.Google Scholar

Sasse, T., and Norris, E. (2019). Moving On: The Costs of High Staff Turnover in the Civil Service. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Savoie, D. J. (1994). Reagan, Thatcher, Mulroney: In Search of a New Bureaucracy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Savoie, D. J. (1999). Governing from the Centre: The Concentration of Power in Canadian Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Savoie, D. J. (2003). Breaking the Bargain: Public Servants, Ministers, and Parliament. Toronto: IPAC/University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Savoie, D. J. (2008). Court Government and the Collapse of Accountability in Canada and the United Kingdom. Toronto: IPAC/University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Savoie, D. J. (2011). Steering from the centre: The Canadian way. In Dahlström, C., Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J., Steering from the Centre: Strengthening Political Control in Western Democracies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 147–65.Google Scholar

Savoie, D. J. (2015). The Canadian public service: In search of a new equilibrium. In Massey, A. and Johnson, K. (eds.), The International Handbook of Public Administration and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 182–98.Google Scholar

Savoie, D. J. (2019). Democracy in Canada: The Disintegration of Our Institutions. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Schlaufer, C. (2019). How does policy advice of the international monetary fund differ along the income of advised countries? Policy Studies 40(3–4): 287–302. DOI:10.1080/01442872.2018.1557620.Google Scholar

SCJHR (2019a, 27 February). Evidence. Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. House of Commons (Canada).Google Scholar

SCJHR (2019b, 6 March). Evidence. Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. House of Commons (Canada).Google Scholar

Schofield, J., and Fershau, J. (2007). Committees inside Canadian legislatures. In Dobuzinskis, L., Howlett, M. and Laycock, D. (eds.), Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 351–74.Google Scholar

Scott, C., and Baehler, K. (2010). Adding Value to Policy Analysis and Advice. Kensington: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar

Scott, G. (2001). Public Management in New Zealand: Lessons and Challenges. Wellington: New Zealand Business Roundtable.Google Scholar

Scott, G. (2010). Improving the Quality and Value of Policy Advice: Committee Appointed by the Review of Expenditure on Policy Advice. Wellington: Government of New Zealand.Google Scholar