Urban Speech Styles of Germanic Languages

doi:10.1017/9781108378291.031

Chapter 30 - Urban Speech Styles of Germanic Languages

from Part V - Language Contact and Nonstandard Varieties

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 March 2020

Pia Quist and

Bente A. Svendsen

Edited by

Michael T. Putnam and

B. Richard Page

Show author details

Michael T. Putnam: Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
B. Richard Page: Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter gives an overview of contemporary urban speech styles in Northern European cities as they have been described by sociolinguists throughout Scandinavian and Northern European countries. By “contemporary urban speech styles” we refer to new contact-induced speech styles or varieties that have emerged among young people in multilingual urban neighborhoods. The chapter outlines linguistic parallels that have been documented across Scandinavia in particular, as well as in Northern Europe, focusing on, first, structural findings such as variation of the verb second constraint, variation of grammatical gender, variation in pronunciation as well as lexical features; second, the chapter gives an account of studies on social identities connected to, perceptions of and media constructions of contemporary urban speech styles.

Keywords

ethnolect multiethnolect urban speech style contact identity perception media

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics , pp. 714 - 735

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108378291.031 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aarsæther, F. 2010. “The use of multiethnic youth language in Oslo.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 111–126.Google Scholar

Aasheim, S. 1995. Kebab-norsk: fremmedspråklig påvirkning på ungdomsspråket i Oslo. [Kebab Norwegian: Influence of foreign languages on the youth language in Oslo.] M.A.thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar

Agha, A. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Androutsopoulos, J. 2009. “Language and the three spheres of hip-hop discourse.” In Ibrahim, A., Alim, H. S., and Pennycook, A. (eds.), Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Identities and the Politics of Language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 43–62.Google Scholar

Androutsopoulos, J. 2010. “Ideologizing ethnolectal German.” In Johnson, S. and Milani, T. M. (eds.), Language Ideologies and Media Discourse: Texts, Practices and Politics. New York: Continuum: 182–202.Google Scholar

Appel, R. and Muysken, P. 1987. Language Contact and Bilingualism. New York: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Appel, R. and Schoonen, R. 2005. “Street language: A multicultural youth register in the Netherlands,” Journal of multilingual and multicultural development 26.2: 85–117.Google Scholar

Auer, P. and Dirim, İ. 2003. “Socio-cultural orientation, urban youth styles and the spontaneous acquisition of Turkish by non-Turkish adolescents in Germany.” In Androutsopoulos, J. and Georgakopoulou, A. (eds.), Discourse Constructions of Youth Identities. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 223–246.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bijvoet, E. 2003. “Attitudes towards ‘Rinkeby Swedish’, a group variety among adolescents in multilingual suburbs.” In Fraurud, K. and Hyltenstam, K. (eds), Multilingualism in Global and Local Perspectives. Stockholm: Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University, and Rinkeby Institute of Multilingual Research: 307–318.Google Scholar

Bijvoet, E. and Fraurud, K. 2008. “Svenskan i dagens flerspråkiga storstadsmiljöer: en explorativ studie av unga stockholmares perceptioner av variation och varieteter” [Swedish spoken in today’s multilingual cities: An explorative study of young Stockholmers’ perceptions of variation and varieties], Nordand 3.2: 7–38.Google Scholar

Bijvoet, E. and Fraurud, K. 2010. “‘Rinkeby Swedish’ in the mind of the beholder. Studying listener perceptions of language variation in multilingual Stockholm.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 170–188.Google Scholar

Blackledge, A. and Creese, A. 2015. “Emblems of identities in four European urban settings.” In Nortier and Svendsen (eds.): 167–182.Google Scholar

Bodén, P. 2010. “Pronunciation in Swedish multiethnolect”, in Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 65–78.Google Scholar

Boyd, S. 2010. “Research on Language in Multilingual Urban Settings in Sweden.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 1–5.Google Scholar

Cheshire, J., Kerswill, P., Fox, S., and Torgersen, E. 2011. “Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English,” Journal of Sociolinguistics 15.2: 151–196.Google Scholar

Christensen, M. V. 2010. “One of My Kind? Language and Ethnicity among Danish Adolescents.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 207–224.Google Scholar

Christensen, M. V. 2012. 8220, 8210. Sproglig variation blandt unge i multietniske områder i Aarhus [8220, 8210. Linguistic Variation among Youth in Multiethnic Areas in Aarhus]. Ph.D. thesis, Aarhus University.Google Scholar

Clyne, M. 2000. “Lingua franca and ethnolects in Europe and beyond.” Sociolinguistica, 14: 83–89.Google Scholar

Cornips, L. 2002. “Etnisch Nederlands.” In Bennis, H., Extra, G., Muysken, P., and Nortier, J. (eds.), Een buurt in beweging. Talen en Culturen in het Utrechtse Lombok en Transvaal [A Neighbourhood on the Move. Languages and Cultures in Lombok and Transvaal, Utrecht]. Amsterdam: Aksant: 285–302.Google Scholar

Cornips, L., Jaspers, J., and de Rooij, V. 2015. “The Politics of Labelling Youth Vernaculars in the Netherlands and Belgium.” In Nortier and Svendsen (eds.): 45–69.Google Scholar

Cutler, C. and Røyneland, U. 2015. “Where the fuck am I from? Hip-Hop youth and the (re)negotiation of language and identity in Norway and the US.” In Nortier and Svendsen (eds.): 139–163.Google Scholar

Dorleijn, M., Mous, M., and Nortier, J. 2015. “Urban youth speech styles in Kenya and the Netherlands.” In Nortier and Svendsen (eds.): 271–289.Google Scholar

Eckert, P. 2004. ”The meaning of style”. www.stanford.edu/eckert/PDF/salsa2003.pdf.Google Scholar

Ekberg, L. 2010. “Extended uses of sån ‘such’ among adolescents in a multilingual context.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 17–30.Google Scholar

Ekberg, L., Opsahl, T., and Wiese, H. 2015. “Functional gains: A cross-linguistic case study on three particles in Swedish, Norwegian and German.” In Nortier and Svendsen (eds.): 93–115.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Freywald, U., Ganuza, N., Opsahl, T., and Cornips, L. 2015. “Beyond verb second – A matter of novel information structural effects? Evidence from Norwegian, Swedish, German and Dutch.” In Nortier and Svendsen (eds.): 73–92.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ganuza, N. 2008. Syntactic Variation in the Swedish of Adolescents in Multilingual Urban Settings: Subject-Verb Order in Declaratives, Questions and Subordinate Clauses. Ph.D. thesis, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar

Ganuza, N. 2010. “Subject-verb order variation in the Swedish of young people in multilingual urban areas.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 31–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Giles, H., Hewstone, M., and Ball, P. 1983. “Language attitudes in multilingual settings: Prologue with priorities,” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 4.2–3: 81–100.Google Scholar

Grønnum, N. 1998. Fonetik og Fonologi. Almen og Dansk. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar

Haglund, C. 2010. “Transnational identifications among adolescents in suburban Sweden.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 96–110.Google Scholar

Hansen, G. F. and Pharao, N. 2010. “Prosody in Copenhagen Multiethnolect.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 79–95.Google Scholar

Hinnenkamp, V. 2003. “Mixed language varieties of migrant adolescents and the discourse of hybridity.” In Jørgensen, J. N. (ed.), Bilingualism and Social Relations: Turkish Speakers in North-West Europe. Bristol: Multilingual Matters: 12–41.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ibrahim, A., Alim, H. S., and Pennycook, A. (eds.) 2009. Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Identities and the Politics of Language. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Ims, I. 2013. ”Språklig registerdanning og verditilskriving: Betegnelser på nye måter å snakke norsk på i Oslo” [Enregisterment and valorisation: Labeling new ways of speaking Norwegian] NOA: Tidsskrift for Norsk som andrespråk, 1. 37–71.Google Scholar

Ims, I. 2014. “Alle snakker norsk. Språkiidedogiog språklig differensiering i mediene” [Everybody speaks Norwegian. Language idedogy and language differentiation in the media] NOA: Tidsskrift for Norsk som andrespråk, 30.1: 5–40.Google Scholar

Jørgensen, J. N. 2010. Languaging: Nine Years of Poly-Lingual Development of Young Turkish-Danish Grade School Students. Copenhagen: Københavnerstudier i tosprogethed.Google Scholar

Jørgensen, J. N. and Quist, P. 2001. ”Native speakers’ judgements of second language Danish,” Language Awareness 10.1: 41–56.Google Scholar

Källström, R. 2010. “Literary use of multiethnic youth language. Noninversion in Swedish fiction.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 142–155.Google Scholar

Källström, R. and Lindberg, I. (eds.) 2011. Young Urban Swedish. Variation and Change in Multilingual Settings. University of Gothenburg: Göteborgsstudier i Nordisk språkvetenskap 14. Website: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/26570 (last accessed October 26, 2017).Google Scholar

Kern, F. and Selting, M. 2011. Ethnic Styles of Speaking in European Metropolitan Areas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kiesling, S. F. 2005. “Variation, style, and stance: Word-final -er and ethnicity in Australian English,” English World Wide 26: 1–42.Google Scholar

Kiessling, R. and Mous, M. 2004. “Urban youth languages in Africa.” Anthropological Linguistics 46.3: 303–341.Google Scholar

Knudsen, J. S. 2010. “‘Playing with words as if it was a rap game’: Hip-hop street language in Oslo.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 156–169.Google Scholar

Kotsinas, U.-B. 1988. “Immigrant children’s Swedish – A new variety?,” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 9.2: 129–140.Google Scholar

Kotsinas, U.-B. 2000. “Språkkontakt og slangspråk i Stockholm.” [Language contact and slang in Stockholm] In Stenström, A.-B., Kotsinas, U.-B., and Drange, E.-M. (eds.), Ungdommers språkmøter. Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerråd: 19–60.Google Scholar

Kristiansen, T. 1997. “Language attitudes in a Danish cinema.” In Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook. London: Macmillan Press Ltd: 291–305.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kristiansen, T. (ed.) 2006. Nordiske sprogholdninger: En masketest [Nordic language attitudes: A matched guise test]. Oslo: Novus forlag. Moderne importord i språka i Norden, Vol. 5.Google Scholar

Kristiansen, T. 2010. “Attitudes, ideology and awareness.” In Wodak, R., Johnston, B., and Kerswill, P. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Thousand Oaks: Sage: 265–278.Google Scholar

Kristiansen, T., Coupland, N., and Garrett, P. 2005. “Introducing subjectivities in language variation and change,” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37: 9–35.Google Scholar

Kulbrandstad, L. A. 2004. “‘Kebabnorsk’, ‘perkerdansk’ og ‘gebrokken’ – ord om innvandreres måte å snakke majoritetsspråket på” [‘Kebab-Norwegian’, ‘perker Danish’ and ‘broken’ – labels on ways of speaking the majority language]. In Sandøy, H. (ed.), Den fleirspråklege utfordringa. Oslo: Novus: 108–130.Google Scholar

Ladegaard, H. J. 2001. “Popular perceptions of standard language: attitudes to ‘regional standards’ in Denmark,” Language Awareness 10.1: 25–40.Google Scholar

Lambert, W. E., Hudgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., and Fillenbaum, S. 1960. “Evaluational Reactions to Spoken Languages,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60.1: 44–51.Google Scholar

Lund, K. 1997. Lærer alle dansk på samme måde?En længdeundersøgelse af voksnes tilegnelse af dansk som andetsprog. Herning: Special-pædagogisk forlag.Google Scholar

Madsen, L. M. 2008. Fighters and Outsiders: Linguistic Practices, Social Identities, and Social Relationships among Urban Youth in a Martial Arts Club. Ph.D. thesis, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Madsen, L. M. 2011. “Social status relations and enregisterment in contemporary Copenhagen,” Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 72. King’s College London.Google Scholar

Madsen, L. M. 2013. “ ‘High’ and ‘low’ in urban Danish speech styles,” Language in Society 42: 115–138.Google Scholar

Madsen, L. M. and Svendsen, B. A. 2015. ”Stylized voices of ethnicity and social division.” In Nortier and Svendsen (eds.): 207–229.Google Scholar

Maegaard, M. 2010. “Linguistic practice and stereotypes among Copenhagen adolescents.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 189–206.CrossRef Google Scholar

Magnusson, J. E. 2015. “‘Självklart känns det mer tryggt att vara där inne i huset’ – om den sociokulturella kontextens betydelse för språkliga repertoarer och identiteter” [The impact of the sociocultural context on linguistic repertoires and identities], Nordand – Nordisk tidsskrift for andrespråksforskning 10.1:7–28.Google Scholar

Marzo, S. and Ceuleers, E. 2011. “The use of Citétaal among adolescents in Limburg. The role of space appropriation in language variation and change,” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 32: 451–60.Google Scholar

Milani, T. 2010. “What’s in a name? Language ideology and social differentiation in a Swedish print-mediated debate,” Journal of Sociolinguistics 14: 116–142.CrossRef Google Scholar

Milani, T., Jonsson, R., and Mhlambi, I. J. (2015). “Shooting the subversive: When non-normative linguistic practices go mainstream in the media.” In Nortier and Svendsen (eds.): 119–138.Google Scholar

Møller, J. S. 2009. ”Stereotyping categorisations of speech styles among linguistic minority Danes in Køge.” In Maegaard, M., Gregersen, F., Quist, P., and Jørgensen, J. N. (eds.), Language Attitudes, Standardization and Language Change. Oslo: Novus: 231–254.Google Scholar

Møller, J. S. 2010. “Polylingualism in the steak house: Exploring linguistic practices in late modern Copenhagen.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 127–141.Google Scholar

Nortier, J. 2001. Murks en Straataal [Murks and street Language]. Amsterdam: Prometheus.Google Scholar

Nortier, J. and Svendsen, B. A. 2015. Language, Youth and Identity in the 21st Century: Linguistic Practices across Urban Spaces. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Opsahl, T. 2009a. “Egentlig alle kan bidra!” – en samling sosiolingvistiske studier av strukturelle trekk ved norsk i multietniske ungdomsmiljøer i Oslo. [Actually everybody may contribute. A collection of sociolinguistic studies of structural features associated with Norwegian as spoken among adolescents in multiethnic areas in Oslo.] Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar

Opsahl, T. 2009b. “Wolla I swear this is typical for the conversational style of adolescents in multiethnic areas in Oslo.” In Gregersen, F. and Røyneland, U. (eds.), Special issue of Nordic Journal of Linguistics. Sociolinguistics 32.2: 221–244.Google Scholar

Opsahl, T. and Nistov, I. 2010. “On some structural aspects of Norwegian spoken among adolescents in multilingual settings in Oslo.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 49–64.Google Scholar

Pharao, N., Maegaard, M., Møller, J. S., and Kristiansen, T. 2014. “Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts,” Language in Society 43.1: 1–32.CrossRef Google Scholar

Quist, P. 2000. “Ny københavnsk ‘multietnolekt’. Om sprogbrug blandt unge i sprogligt og kulturelt heterogene miljøer” [New Copenhagen ‘multiethnolect’. Language use among young people in linguistically and culturally heterogeneous settings], Danske Talesprog 1: 143–212.Google Scholar

Quist, P. 2008. “Sociolinguistic approaches to multiethnolect: Language variety and stylistic practice,” International Journal of Bilingualism 12: 43–61.Google Scholar

Quist, P. 2009. “Multietnolekt – del af stilistiske praksisser i storbyen [Multiethnolect – part of stylistic practices in the cities].” In NyS. Nydanske Studier og Almen Kommunikationsteori 37: 10–33.Google Scholar

Quist, P. 2012. Stilistisk Praksis [Stylistic Practice]. København: Museum Tusculanum.Google Scholar

Quist, P. 2015. “Konstruktion af ‘perkerdansk’ og danskhed i online debatter om multietnisk ungdomsstil,” Danske Talesprog 15: 173–192.Google Scholar

Quist, P. 2016. “Representations of multi-ethnic youth styles in Danish broadcast media.” In Coupland, N., Thøgersen, N. J., and Mortensen, J. (eds.), Style, Media and Language Ideologies. Oslo: Novus: 217–234.Google Scholar

Quist, P. 2018. “Alternative place naming in the diverse margins of an ideologically mono-lingual society.” In Cornips, L. and de Rooij, V. (eds.), The Sociolinguistics of Place and Belonging: Perspectives from the Margins. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 239–259.Google Scholar

Quist, P. and Svendsen, B. A. (eds.) 2010. Multilingual Urban Scandinavia: New Linguistic Practices. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Quist, P. and Svendsen, B. A. 2015. “MultiNord 2007–2015: Et nettverk for forskning om språk i heterogene byrom – empiriske og teoretiske hovedlinjer” [MultiNorth 2007–2015: A network on research on language in heterogeneous urban spaces – empirical and theoretical main approaches]. NOA – Tidsskrift for norsk andrespråksforskning, 1–2: 151–194.Google Scholar

Rampton, B. 2006. Language in Late Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rampton, B. 2015. “Contemporary urban vernaculars.” In J. Nortier and B. A. Svendsen (eds.): 24–45.Google Scholar

Silverstein, M. 1985. “Language and the culture of gender.” In Mertz, E. and Parmentier, R. J. (eds.), Semiotic Mediation. New York: Academic Press: 219–259.Google Scholar

Sollid, H. 2013. “Ethnolects in Northern Norway: From national negligence to local linguistic pride.” In Siemund, P., Gogolin, I., Schulz, M. E., and Davydova, J. (eds.), Multilingualism and Language Diversity in Urban Areas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 63–94.Google Scholar

Statistics Sweden, Norway and Denmark 2017. http://www.scb.se/en/, https://www.ssb.no/en/, http://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik, last accessed October 21, 2017.Google Scholar

Stjernholm, K. 2012. Stedet velger ikke lenger deg, du velger et sted. Tre artikler om språk i Oslo [You are no longer Chosen by a Place, you Choose a Place. Three Articles on Language in Oslo]. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar

Stroud, C. 2004. “Rinkeby Swedish and semilingualism in language ideology debates: A Bourdieuan perspective,” Journal of Sociolinguistics 8.2: 196–214.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stæhr, A. 2010. Rappen reddede os. Et studie af senmoderne storbydrenges identitetsarbejde i fritids- og skolemiljøer [Rap saved us. A study of late modern urban boys’ identity work in leisure and school environments]. University of Copenhagen: Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism, Vol. 54.Google Scholar

Svendsen, B. A. 2010. “Linguistic Practices in Multilingual Urban Contexts in Norway: An Overview.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): 12–16.Google Scholar

Svendsen, B. A. 2014. “Kebabnorskdebatten. En språkideologisk kamp om sosial identitet og verdier” [Social identities and values in the debate on ‘Kebab-Norwegian’ – an ideological battlefield], Norsk tidsskrift for ungdomsforskning 1: 33–62.Google Scholar

Svendsen, B. A. 2015. “Language, youth and identity in the 21st century: Content and continuations.” In Nortier and Svendsen (eds.): 1–23.Google Scholar

Svendsen, B. A. and Røyneland, U. 2008. “Multiethnolectal facts and functions in Oslo, Norway,” International Journal of Bilingualism 12: 63–83.Google Scholar

Svendsen, B. A. and Quist, P. 2010. “Introduction.” In Quist and Svendsen (eds.): xiii–xxiii.Google Scholar

Svendsen, B. A. and Marzo, S. 2015. “A ‘new’ speech style is born: The omnipresence of structure and agency in the life of semiotic registers in heterogeneous urban spaces,” European Journal of Applied Linguistics 3.1: 47–85.Google Scholar

Wiese, H. 2011. “The role of information structure in linguistic variation: evidence from a German multiethnolect.” In Gregersen, F., Parrott, J., and Quist, P. (eds.), Language Variation – European Perspectives III. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 83–95.Google Scholar

Wiese, H. 2012. Kiezdeutsch: Ein Neuer Dialekt Entsteht. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.