Book contents
- Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems
- Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems
- 2 Developmental Dyslexia in English
- 3 Developmental Dyslexia in French
- 4 Developmental Dyslexia in Dutch
- 5 Developmental Dyslexia in Czech and Slovak
- 6 Developmental Dyslexia in Finnish
- 7 Developmental Dyslexia in Russian
- 8 Developmental Dyslexia in Hebrew
- 9 Developmental Dyslexia in Japanese
- 10 Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese
- Part II Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Developmental Dyslexia
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
6 - Developmental Dyslexia in Finnish
from Part I - Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 September 2019
Book contents
- Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems
- Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems
- 2 Developmental Dyslexia in English
- 3 Developmental Dyslexia in French
- 4 Developmental Dyslexia in Dutch
- 5 Developmental Dyslexia in Czech and Slovak
- 6 Developmental Dyslexia in Finnish
- 7 Developmental Dyslexia in Russian
- 8 Developmental Dyslexia in Hebrew
- 9 Developmental Dyslexia in Japanese
- 10 Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese
- Part II Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Developmental Dyslexia
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
Summary
Written Finnish and the Finnish literacy culture provide an exceptional context for an interesting separation of the various processes associated with reading acquisition. The orthography of Finnish is relatively optimally wired to give young learners an easy time acquiring basic decoding skills. Finnish orthography has full transparency in both reading and writing. After learning the limited set of sounds connected consistently with specific graphemes, learners usually learn to decode accurately, even those with learning difficulties in reading.
The high status of literacy in Finland, which dates from the early stages of its writing system, has led to additional benefits. The written language of Finnish was established in the mid-sixteenth century. The first book published in Finnish was an ABC-book, a primer for reading and a catechism. As early as the seventeenth century, literacy started to become more common with the influence of the church.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems , pp. 118 - 132Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Aro, M. (2017). Learning to read Finnish. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 416–436). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Brem, S., Bach, S., & Kucian, K. et al. (2010). Brain sensitivity to print emerges when children learn letter–speech sound correspondences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 7939–7944.Google Scholar
Guttorm, T., Leppänen, P., Hämäläinen, J., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Newborn event-related potentials predict poorer pre-reading skills in children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 391–401.Google Scholar
Heikkilä, R., Aro, M., Närhi, V., Westerholm, J., & Ahonen, T. (2013). Does training in syllable recognition improve reading speed? A computer-based trial with poor readers from second and third grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 398–414.Google Scholar
Holopainen, L., Ahonen, T., & Lyytinen, H. (2001). Predicting delay in reading achievement in a highly transparent language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 3(4), 401–413.Google Scholar
Huemer, S., Aro, M., Landerl, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Repeated reading of syllables among Finnish-speaking children with poor reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 317–340.Google Scholar
Ketonen, R. (2010). Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, 0075–4625, 404. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Kirjavainen, T., Pulkkinen, J., & Jahnukainen, M. (2013). Erityisopetuksen muutostrendit perusopetuksessa 2000-luvulla [The trends of change in special education after year 2000]. Valtiontalouden tarkastusvirasto [National Audit Office of Finland]. https://docplayer.fi/10162284-Erityisopetuksen-muutostrendit-perusopetuksessa-2000-luvulla.html. Accessed January 25, 2015.Google Scholar
Kujala, T., Karma, K., & Ceponiene, R. et al. (2001). Plastic neural changes and reading improvement caused by audiovisual training in reading-impaired children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 10509–10514.Google Scholar
Leppänen, P. H. T., Hämäläinen, J. A., & Salminen, H. et al. (2010). Brain event-related potentials reveal atypical processing of sound frequency and the subsequent association with later literacy skills in children with familial dyslexia. Cortex, 46, 1362–1376.Google Scholar
Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J., Hämäläinen, J., Torppa, M., & Ronimus, M. (2015). Dyslexia – Early identification and prevention: Highlights from the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Dyslexia. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 2, 330–338.Google Scholar
Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J., Kujala, J., Ojanen, E., & Richardson, U. (2009). In search of a science-based application: A learning tool for reading acquisition. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 668–675.Google Scholar
Malin, A., Sulkunen, S., & Laine, K. (2013). PIAAC 2012. Kansainvälisen aikuistutkimuksen ensituloksia [PIAAC 2012. The survey of adult skills]. Helsinki: Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja, 19.Google Scholar
Official Statistics of Finland. (2014). Special education. Share of students having received special support diminished [e-publication]. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. www.tilastokeskus.fi/til/erop/2013/erop_2013_2014–06-12_tie_001_en.html. Accessed January 25, 2015.Google Scholar
Oksanen, A.-M. (2012). Auditiivisen ja kielellisen harjoittelun vaikutus kolmannella luokalla olevien heikkojen lukijoiden lukutaitoon. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, 443. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Poskiparta, E., Niemi, P., & Vauras, M. (1999). Who benefits from training in linguistic awareness in the first grade, and what components show training effects? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 437–446.Google Scholar
Richardson, U., Leppänen, P. H. T., Leiwo, M., & Lyytinen, H. (2003). Speech perception of infants with high familial risk for dyslexia differ at the age of 6 months. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23, 385–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, U., & Lyytinen, H. (2014). The GraphoGame method: The theoretical and methodological background of the technology-enhanced learning environment for learning to read. Human Technology, 10, 39–60.Google Scholar
Saine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2011). Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at-risk for reading disability. Child Development, 82, 1013–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 4
- Cited by