Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T13:46:55.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2018

Jaime E. Settle
Affiliation:
College of William and Mary, Virginia
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Frenemies
How Social Media Polarizes America
, pp. 257 - 280
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. 2008. “Don’t Blame Primary Voters for Polarization.” The Forum 5(4) (online).Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?The Journal of Politics 70(2): 542555.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2005. “Why Can’t We All Just Get Along? The Reality of a Polarized America.” The Forum 3(2) (online).Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. and Saunders, Kyle L.. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the US Electorate.” The Journal of Politics 60(3): 634652.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. and Stone, Walter J.. 2006. “The Bush Effect: Polarization, Turnout, and Activism in the 2004 Presidential Election.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 36(2): 141154.Google Scholar
Abrams, Samuel J. and Fiorina, Morris P.. 2012. “‘The Big Sort’ That Wasn’t: A Skeptical Reexamination.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45(2): 203210.Google Scholar
Ahler, Douglas J. 2014. “Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization.” The Journal of Politics 76(3): 607620.Google Scholar
Ahler, Douglas J. and Sood, Gaurav. 2018. “The Parties in Our Heads: Misperceptions about Party Composition and Their Consequences.” The Journal of Politics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Ahn, Toh-Kyeong, Huckfeldt, Robert, and Ryan, John Barry. 2014. Experts, Activists, and Democratic Politics: Are Electorates Self-Educating? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ahn, Toh-Kyeong, Huckfeldt, Robert, and Ryan, John Barry. 2010. “Communication, Influence, and Informational Asymmetries among Voters.” Political Psychology 31(5): 763787.Google Scholar
Allport, Gordon W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Michael. 2017. “4 Ways to Block Political Posts on Facebook.” PCWorld (February 20).Google Scholar
Anspach, Nicolas. 2017. “The New Personal Influence: How Our Facebook Friends Influence the News We Read.” Political Communication 34(4): 590606.Google Scholar
Anspach, Nicolas. 2016. “The Facebook Effect: Political News in the Age of Social Media.” PhD Dissertation. Temple University.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin and Johnson, Martin. 2013. Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin, Johnson, Martin, and Murphy, Chad. 2012. “Polarized Political Communication, Oppositional Media Hostility, and Selective Exposure.” The Journal of Politics 74(1): 174186.Google Scholar
Armas, Genaro C. 2004. “From NASCAR Dad to Soccer Mom, Campaigns Drawn to Political Labels.” nwi.com (June 20), www.nwitimes.com/news/opinion/from-nascar-dad-to-soccer-mom-campaigns-drawn-to-political/article_d7c70776-5b70-5bb4-8e2d-286162f31545.html.Google Scholar
Bafumi, Joseph and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2009. “A New Partisan Voter.” The Journal of Politics 71(1): 124.Google Scholar
Bakshy, Eytan, Messing, Solomon, and Adamic, Lada A.. 2015. “Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook.” Science 348(6239): 11301132.Google Scholar
Barbera, Pablo. 2015. “Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together. Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data.” Political Analysis 23(1): 7691.Google Scholar
Bareket-Bojmel, Liad, Moran, Simone, and Shahar, Golan. 2016. “Strategic Self-Presentation on Facebook: Personal Motives and Audience Response to Online Behavior.” Computers in Human Behavior 55: 788795.Google Scholar
Barnes, Robert. 2015. “Supreme Court Rules Gay Couples Nationwide Have a Right to Marry.” Washington Post (June 26).Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi. 2008. Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew A. 2003. “Soft News and Political Knowledge: Evidence of Absence or Absence of Evidence?Political Communication 20(2): 173190.Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew A. and Kernell, Samuel. 1999. “Has Cable Ended the Golden Age of Presidential Television?American Political Science Review 93(1): 99114.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Jody. 2008. “American Youth and the Effects of Online Political Humor,” in Baumgartner, Jody C. and Morris, Jonathan S. (eds.), Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Jody and Morris, Jonathan S.. 2006. “The Daily Show Effect: Candidate Evaluations, Efficacy, and American Youth.” American Politics Research 34(3): 341367.Google Scholar
Beam, Christopher. 2008. “One-Armed Vegetarian Live-In Boyfriends: The Quest for This Year’s Sexy Swing Demographic.” Slate, www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2008/07/onearmed_vegetarian_livein_boyfriends.html.Google Scholar
Becker, David. 2016. “New State Data to Celebrate National Voter Registration Day.” ElectionInnovation.org (September 28).Google Scholar
Bennett, William J. 2012. “Republicans Lost the Culture War.” CNN (November 14), www.cnn.com/2012/11/14/opinion/bennett-gop-election/.Google Scholar
Benton, Joshua. 2011. “‘Like,’ ‘Share,’ and ‘Recommend’: How the Warring Verbs of Social Media Will Influence the News’ Future.” NiemanLab (February 28).Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard Reuben, Lazarsfeld, Paul Felix, and MacPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20(3): 351368.Google Scholar
Berlet, Chip and Clarkson, Frederick. 2008. “Culture Wars, Evangelicals, and Political Power: Lessons from the 2008 Presidential Election.” The Public Eye Magazine, www.publiceye.org/magazine/v23n4/culture_war_2008.html.Google Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. 2001. “Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level.” Political Research Quarterly 54(1): 5367.Google Scholar
Bishop, Bill. 2008. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon R. and Fleisher, Richard (eds.). 2000. Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in the Partisan Era. Washington, DC: CQ Press College.Google Scholar
Bond, Robert M., Fariss, Christopher J., Jones, Jason J., et al. 2012. “A 61-Million-Person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization.” Nature 489(7415): 295298.Google Scholar
Bond, Robert M., Settle, Jaime E., Fariss, Christopher J., et al. 2017. “Social Endorsement Cues and Political Participation.” Political Communication 34(2): 261281.Google Scholar
Bond, Robert M. and Messing, Solomon. 2015. “Quantifying Social Media’s Political Space: Estimating Ideology from Publicly Revealed Preferences on Facebook.” American Political Science Review 109(1): 6278.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Castel, Robert, Schnapper, Dominique, et al. 1965. Un art moyen: essai sur les usages sociaux de la photographie. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Boyd, Danah. 2014. It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Danah and Ellison, Nicole B.. 2007. “Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1): 210230.Google Scholar
Brashears, Matthew E. 2011. “Small Networks and High Isolation? A Reexamination of American Discussion Networks.” Social Networks 33(4): 331341.Google Scholar
Broockman, David and Kalla, Joshua. 2016. “Durably Reducing Transphobia: A Field Experiment on Door-to-Door Canvassing.” Science 352(6282): 220224.Google Scholar
Broockman, David E. and Ryan, Timothy J.. 2016. “Preaching to the Choir: Americans Prefer Communicating to Copartisan Elected Officials.” American Journal of Political Science 60(4): 10931107.Google Scholar
Brown, Clifford E. 1982. “A False Consensus Bias in 1980 Presidential Preferences.” The Journal of Social Psychology 118(1): 137138.Google Scholar
Budak, Ceren, Goel, Sharad, and Rao, Justin M.. 2016. “Fair and Balanced? Quantifying Media Bias through Crowdsourced Content Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1): 250271.Google Scholar
Bui, Quoctrung. 2016. “The Demographics Behind #InternsSoWhite.” TheUpshot.com (July 22).Google Scholar
Bullock, John G., Gerber, Alan S., Hill, Seth J., and Huber, Gregory A.. 2015. “Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10(4): 519578.Google Scholar
Busby, Ethan, Howat, Adam, Rothschild, Jacob, and Shafranek, Richard. 2017. “Putting People into Boxes: The Correlates and Effects of Partisan and Racial Stereotypes.” Prepared for the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association New Orleans, LA, January 12–14.Google Scholar
Butler, Daniel M. and Neff Powell, Eleanor. 2014. “Understanding the Party Brand: Experimental Evidence on the Role of Valence.” Journal of Politics 76(2): 492505.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, E. Donald. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carlin, Ryan E. and Love, Gregory J.. 2013. “The Politics of Interpersonal Trust and Reciprocity: An Experimental Approach.” Political Behavior 35(1): 4363.Google Scholar
Carlson, Taylor N. and Settle, Jaime E.. 2016. “Political Chameleons: An Exploration of Conformity in Political Discussions.” Political Behavior 38(4): 817859.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A.. 1982. “Racial Issues and the Structure of Mass Belief Systems.” Journal of Politics 44(1): 220.Google Scholar
Carney, Dana R., Jost, John T., Gosling, Samuel D., and Potter, Jeff. 2008. “The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind.” Political Psychology 29(6): 807840.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Christopher J. 2012. “Narcissism on Facebook: Self-Promotional and Anti-Social behavior.” Personality and Individual Differences 52(4): 482486.Google Scholar
Carter, Bill. 2012. “Republicans Like Golf, Democrats Prefer Cartoons, TV Research Suggests.” The New York Times (October 11).Google Scholar
Chambers, John R., Schlenker, B. R., and Collisson, B.. 2013. “Ideology and Prejudice: The Role of Value Conflicts.” Psychological Science 24(2): 140149.Google Scholar
Chambers, John R. and Melnyk, Darya. 2006. “Why Do I Hate Thee? Conflict Misperceptions and Intergroup Mistrust.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32(10): 12951311.Google Scholar
Chambers, John R., Baron, Robert S., and Inman, Mary L.. 2006. “Misperceptions in Intergroup Conflict: Disagreeing about What We Disagree about.” Psychological Science 17(1): 3845.Google Scholar
Cherny, Andrei. 2013. “Forget Soccer Moms and NASCAR Dads, in 2016 It’s about ALICE.” HuffPost (October 29), www.huffingtonpost.com/andrei-cherny/forget-soccer-moms-and-na_b_4174225.html.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis and Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10(1): 103126.Google Scholar
Clinton, Joshua, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.” American Political Science Review 98(2): 355370.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, Searing, Donald D., and Crewe, Ivor M.. 2002. “The Deliberative Potential of Political Discussion.” British Journal of Political Science 32(1): 2162.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston and Feldman, Stanley. 1981. “The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications.” American Journal of Political Science 25(4): 617645.Google Scholar
Conroy, Meredith, Feezell, Jessica T., and Guerrero, Mario. 2012. “Facebook and Political Engagement: A Study of Online Political Group Membership and Offline Political Engagement.” Computers in Human Behavior 28(5): 15351546.Google Scholar
Constine, Josh. 2016. “How Facebook News Feed Works.” TechCrunch (September 6).Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,” in Apter, D. E. (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. London: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Coppock, Alexander, Guess, Andrew, and Ternovski, John. 2016. “When Treatments Are Tweets: A Network Mobilization Experiment over Twitter.” Political Behavior 38(1): 105128.Google Scholar
Corneille, Olivier and Judd, Charles M.. 1999. “Accentuation and Sensitization Effects in the Categorization of Multifaceted Stimuli.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(5): 927941.Google Scholar
Correll, J. and Park, B.. 2005. “A Model of the Ingroup as a Social Resource.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 9(4): 341359.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1975. “Play and Intrinsic Rewards.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 15(3): 4163.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly and Larson, Reed. 2014. “Validity and Reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method,” in Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Dordecht: Springer, pp. 3554.Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert. 2011. Poetry and the Police. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Nicholas T. and Dunaway, Johanna L.. 2016. “Party Polarization, Media Choice, and Mass Partisan-Ideological Sorting.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1): 272297.Google Scholar
Davis, Richard, Bacha, Christina Holtz, and Just, Marion R. (eds.). 2016. Twitter and Elections around the World: Campaigning in 140 Characters or Less. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M., David, Singer, and Lemons, Frank. 1972. “An Experimental Analysis of the Contrast Effect and Its Implications for Intergroup Communication and the Indirect Assessment of Attitude1.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21(3): 281295.Google Scholar
De Castella, Tom. 2012. “Five Ways the Digital Camera Changed Us.” BBC News (February 28).Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X. 2009. “Something’s Going on Here, But We Don’t Know What It Is: Measuring Citizens’ Exposure to Politically Relevant Information in the New Media Environment,” in King, Gary, Schlozman, Kay L., and Nie, Norman (eds.), The Future of Political Science: 100 Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., Cook, Fay Lomax, and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. 2004. “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 7(1): 315344.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X. and Keeter, Scott. 1997. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Del Vicario, Michela, Bessi, Alessandro, Zollo, Fabiana, et al. 2016. “The Spreading of Misinformation Online.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(3): 554559.Google Scholar
Devine, Christopher J. 2015. “Ideological Social Identity: Psychological Attachment to Ideological In-Groups as a Political Phenomenon and a Behavioral Influence.” Political Behavior 37(3): 509535.Google Scholar
Dewey, Caitlin. 2016. “Facebook Has Repeatedly Trended Fake News Since Firing Its Human Editors.” Washington Post (October 12).Google Scholar
Dewey, Caitlin. 2016. “The Most Compelling Reason to Never Talk Politics on Facebook.” Washington Post (August 4).Google Scholar
Dewey, Caitlin. 2015. “More than 26 Million People Have Changed Their Facebook Picture to a Rainbow Flag. Here’s Why That Matters.”Washington Post (June 29), www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/06/29/more-than-26-million-people-have-changed-their-facebook-picture-to-a-rainbow-flag-heres-why-that-matters/.Google Scholar
Dickey, Megan Rose. 2013. “It’s Hard to Believe How Drastic the Changes to Facebook Have Been over the Years.” Business Insider, www.businessinsider.com/facebook-evolution-2013-3.Google Scholar
DiDonato, Theresa E., Ullrich, Johannes, and Krueger, Joachim I.. 2011. “Social Perception as Induction and Inference: An Integrative Model of Intergroup Differentiation, Ingroup Favoritism, and Differential Accuracy.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100(1): 6683.Google Scholar
Doherty, David. 2013. “To Whom Do People Think Representatives Should Respond: Their District or the Country?Public Opinion Quarterly 77(1): 237255.Google Scholar
Dowling, Conor M. and Wichowsky, Amber. 2015. “Attacks without Consequence? Candidates, Parties, Groups, and the Changing Face of Negative Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 1936.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Peterson, Erik, and Slothuus, Rune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107(1): 5779.Google Scholar
Duggan, Maeve and Smith, Aaron. 2016. “The Political Environment on Social Media.” Pew Research Center Report, released October 25.Google Scholar
Dunbar, Robin. 2016. “Do Online Social Media Cut through the Constraints that Limit the Size of Offline Social Networks?Royal Society Open Science 3(1): 150292.Google Scholar
Dunbar, Robin. 1998. Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dunham, Yarrow, Arechar, Antonio A., and Rand, David G.. 2016. “From Foe to Friend and Back Again: The Temporal Dynamics of Intra-Party Bias in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election,” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2846915.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2008. “Endless Culture War: Pastimes and Preachers May Matter as Much as Guns and Butter,” www.economist.com/node/12321661.Google Scholar
Eliasoph, Nina. 1998. Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellemers, Naomi, Spears, Russell, and Doosje, Bertjan. 2002. “Self and Social Identity.” Annual Review of Psychology 53(1): 161186.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher and Stimson, James A.. 2012. Ideology in America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Reid J. 2014. “Liberals Eat Here. Conservatives Eat There.” The Wall Street Journal Online, http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/05/02/liberals-eat-here-conservatives-eat-there/.Google Scholar
Eriksson, Kimmo and Funcke, Alexander. 2015. “A Below‐Average Effect with Respect to American Political Stereotypes on Warmth and Competence.” Political Psychology 36(3): 341350.Google Scholar
Esralew, S. and Young, D.. 2012. “The Influence of Parodies on Mental Models: Exploring the Tina Fey–Sarah Palin Phenomenon.” Communication Quarterly 60(3): 338352.Google Scholar
Evans, Heather K. and Clark, Jennifer Hayes. 2016. “‘You Tweet Like a Girl!’ How Female Candidates Campaign on Twitter.” American Politics Research 44(2): 326352.Google Scholar
Facebook Data Science Blog. 2014. “Politics and Culture on Facebook in the 2014 Midterm Elections.” October 28, www.facebook.com/data/.Google Scholar
Facebook Press Team. 2014. “The Ice Bucket Challenge on Facebook.” Facebook Newsroom, http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2014/08/the-ice-bucket-challenge-on-facebook/.Google Scholar
Feeney, Nolan. 2015. “Facebook’s New Photo Filter Lets You Show Solidarity with Paris.” TIME, http://time.com/4113171/paris-attacks-facebook-filter-french-flag-profile-picture/.Google Scholar
Feezell, Jessica T. 2018. “Agenda Setting through Social Media: The Importance of Incidental News Exposure and Social Filtering in the Digital Era.” Political Research Quarterly, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Fields, James M. and Schuman, Howard. 1976. “Public Beliefs about the Beliefs of the Public.” Public Opinion Quarterly 40(4): 427448.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 2013. “America’s Polarized Politics: Causes and Solutions.” Perspectives on Politics 11(3): 852859.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. and Abrams, Samuel J.. 2008. “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 563588.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel A., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2008. “Polarization in the American Public: Misconceptions and Misreadings.” The Journal of Politics 70(2): 556560.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James S. and Luskin, Robert C.. 2005. “Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion.” Acta Politica 40(3): 284298.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Jennifer. 2013. “What Does “Political” Mean to You?Political Behavior 35(3): 453479.Google Scholar
Flaxman, Seth, Goel, Sharad, and Rao, Justin. 2016. “Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1): 298320.Google Scholar
Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Peyton, Buddy, and Verkuilen, Jay. 2007. “Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivation and Opinion on Iraq.” Journal of Politics 69(4): 957974.Google Scholar
Gainous, Jason and Wagner, Kevin. 2013. Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Bryan. 2015. “You’ll Be Outraged at How Easy It Was to Get You to Click on This Headline.” Wired (December 18).Google Scholar
Garner, Andrew and Palmer, Harvey. 2011. “Polarization and Issue Consistency over Time.” Political Behavior 33(2): 225246.Google Scholar
Garrett, R. Kelly. 2013. “Selective Exposure: New Methods and New Directions.” Communication Methods and Measures 7(3–4): 247256.Google Scholar
Garrett, R. Kelly, Carnahan, Dustin, and Lynch, Emily K.. 2013. “A Turn Toward Avoidance? Selective Exposure to Online Political Information, 2004–2008.” Political Behavior 35(1): 113134.Google Scholar
Garrett, R. Kelly, Gvirsman, Shira Dvir, Johnson, Benjamin K., et al. 2014. “Implications of Pro‐ and Counterattitudinal Information Exposure for Affective Polarization.” Human Communication Research 40(3): 309332.Google Scholar
Gee, Laura K., Jones, Jason, and Burke, Moira. 2017. “Social Networks and Labor Markets: How Strong Ties Relate to Job Finding on Facebook’s Social Network.” Journal of Labor Economics 35(2): 485518.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew. 2009. Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew and Shapiro, Jesse M.. 2011. “Ideological Segregation Online and Offline.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(4): 17991839.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., Doherty, David, and Dowling, Conor M.. 2012. “Disagreement and the Avoidance of Political Discussion: Aggregate Relationships and Differences across Personality Traits.” American Journal of Political Science 56(4): 849874.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., Doherty, David, et al. “Personality and Political Attitudes: Relationships across Issue Domains and Political Contexts.” American Political Science Review 104(1): 111–133.Google Scholar
Gervais, Bryan T. 2015. “Incivility Online: Affective and Behavioral Reactions to Uncivil Political Posts in a Web-Based Experiment.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 12(2): 167185.Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1977. “The Theory of Affordances,” in Shaw, R. and Bransford, J. (eds.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 6782.Google Scholar
Gift, Karen and Gift, Thomas. 2015. “Does Politics Influence Hiring? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.” Political Behavior 37(3): 653675.Google Scholar
Gil de Zúñiga, Homero, Molyneux, Logan, and Zheng, Pei. 2014. “Social Media, Political Expression, and Political Participation: Panel Analysis of Lagged and Concurrent Relationships.” Journal of Communication 64(4): 612634.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilovich, Thomas. 1990. “Differential Construal and the False Consensus Effect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(4): 623634.Google Scholar
Gimpel, James G. and Hui, Iris S.. 2015. “Seeking Politically Compatible Neighbors? The Role of Neighborhood Partisan Composition in Residential Sorting.” Political Geography 48: 130142.Google Scholar
Gladwell, Malcolm. 2010. “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted.” The New Yorker (October 4).Google Scholar
Glassman, Matthew E., Straus, Jacob R., and Shogan, Colleen J.. 2013. “Social Networking and Constituent Communications: Members’ Use of Twitter and Facebook During a Two-Month Period in the 112th Congress.” Congressional Research Service report R43018.Google Scholar
Goethals, George R., Allison, Shelley Jean, and Frost, Marnie. 1979. “Perceptions of the Magnitude and Diversity of Social Support.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 15(6): 570581.Google Scholar
Goette, Lorenz, Huffman, David, and Meier, Stephan. 2012. “The Impact of Social Ties on Group Interactions: Evidence from Minimal Groups and Randomly Assigned Real Groups.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4(1): 101115.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
Golbeck, Jennifer, Grimes, Justin M., and Rogers, Anthony. 2010. “Twitter Use by the U.S. Congress.” Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology 61(8): 16121621.Google Scholar
Gottfried, Jeffrey and Shearer, Elisa. 2016. “News Use across Social Media Platforms 2016.” Pew Research Report, released May 26.Google Scholar
Gottfried, Jeffrey, Barthel, Michael, and Shearer, Elisa. 2016. “Changing a Social Media Profile Picture is One Way to Express Support or Solidarity.” Pew Research Center’s Fact Tank Blog (March 28).Google Scholar
Graber, Doris A. and Holyk, Gregory G.. 2011. “The News Industry,” in Shapiro, Robert and Jacobs, Lawrence (eds.), Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Jesse, Nosek, Brian A., and Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. “The Moral Stereotypes of Liberals and Conservatives: Exaggeration of Differences across the Political Spectrum.” PLoS ONE 7(12): e50092.Google Scholar
Graham, Jesse, Haidt, Jonathan, and Nosek, Brian A.. 2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(5): 10291046.Google Scholar
Granberg, Donald. 1987. “Candidate Preference, Membership Group, and Estimates of Voting Behavior.” Social Cognition 5(4): 323335.Google Scholar
Granberg, Donald and Brent, Edward. 1983. “When Prophecy Bends: The Preference–Expectation Link in US Presidential Elections, 1952–1980.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(3): 477491.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Steven. 2002. “The Social-Psychological Measurement of Partisanship.” Political Behavior 24(3): 171197.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Shannon, Perrin, Andrew, and Duggan, Maeve. 2016. “Social Media Update 2016.” Pew Research Center Report, released November 11.Google Scholar
Groeling, Tim. 2013. “Media Bias by the Numbers: Challenges and Opportunities in the Empirical Study of Partisan News.” Annual Review of Political Science 16: 129151.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim. 2011. Left Turn: How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim and Milyo, Jeffrey. 2005. “A Measure of Media Bias.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(4): 11911237.Google Scholar
Gulati, Girish J. and Williams, Christine B.. 2013. “Social Media and Campaign 2012: Developments and Trends for Facebook Adoption.” Social Science Computer Review 31(5): 577588.Google Scholar
Gye, Lisa. 2007. “Picture This: The Impact of Mobile Camera Phones on Personal Photographic Practices.” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 21(2): 279288.Google Scholar
Halpern, Daniel, Valenzuela, Sebastián, and Katz, James E.. 2016. “‘Selfie-ists’ or ‘Narci-Selfiers’?: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis of Selfie Taking and Narcissism.” Personality and Individual Differences 97: 98101.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James T. 2004. All the News that’s Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, Keith N. 2011. “Comparing Bonding and Bridging Ties for Democratic Engagement: Everyday Use of Communication Technologies within Social Networks for Civic and Civil Behaviors.” Information, Communication & Society 14(4): 510528.Google Scholar
Hampton, Keith N., Goulet, Lauren Sessions, Marlow, Cameron, and Lee, Rainie. 2012. “Why Most Facebook Users Get More than They Give.” Pew Research Center Report, released February 3.Google Scholar
Hampton, Keith N., Rainie, L., Lu, W., et al. 2014. “Social Media and the ‘Spiral of Silence.’” Pew Research Center Report, released August 26.Google Scholar
Hayes, Andrew F., Glynn, Carroll J., and Shanahan, James. 2005. “Willingness to Self-Censor: A Construct and Measurement Tool for Public Opinion Research.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(3): 298323.Google Scholar
Heimlich, Russell. 2012. “Number of Americans Who Read Print Newspapers Continues Decline.” Pew Research Center’s Fact Tank Blog (October 11).Google Scholar
Herrera, Tim. 2014. “What Facebook Doesn’t Show You.” Washington Post (August 18).Google Scholar
Hersh, Eitan D. and Schaffner, Brian F.. 2013. “Targeted Campaign Appeals and the Value of Ambiguity.” Journal of Politics 75(2): 520534.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95(3): 619631.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. and Weiler, Jonathan D.. 2009. “Threat and Authoritarianism: Polarization or Convergence,” in Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 109133.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. and Weiler, Jonathan D.. 2018. Prius or Pickup?: How the Answers to Four Simple Questions Explain America’s Great Divide. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., Long, Meri T., and Rudolph, Thomas J.. 2016. “Revisiting the Myth.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1): 321350.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. and Rudolph, Thomas J.. 2015. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hibbing, Matthew V., Ritchie, Melinda, and Anderson, Mary R.. 2011. “Personality and Political Discussion.” Political Behavior 33(4): 601624.Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael A., Abrams, Dominic, Otten, Sabine, and Hinkle, Steve. 2004. “The Social Identity Perspective Intergroup Relations, Self-Conception, and Small Groups.” Small Group Research 35(3): 246276.Google Scholar
Hongo, Hudson. 2017. “Facebook Finally Rolls Out ‘Disputed News’ Tag Everyone Will Dispute.” Gizmodo (March 3).Google Scholar
Horwitz, S. Nechama and Nir, Lilach. 2015. “How Politics-News Parallelism Invigorates Partisanship Strength.” International Political Science Review 36(2): 153167.Google Scholar
Huber, Gregory and Paris, Celia. 2013. “Assessing the Programmatic Equivalence Assumption in Question Wording Experiments: Understanding Why Americans Like Assistance to the Poor More than Welfare.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77(1): 385397.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R. Robert. 1983. “Social Contexts, Social Networks, and Urban Neighborhoods: Environmental Constraints on Friendship Choice.” American Journal of Sociology 89(3): 651669.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert and Morehouse Mendez, Jeanette. 2008. “Moths, Flames, and Political Engagement: Managing Disagreement within Communication Networks.” The Journal of Politics 70(1): 8396.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert and Sprague, John. 1992. “Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization: Political Structure, Social Structure, and the Party Canvass.” American Political Science Review 86(1): 7086.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Johnson, P., and Sprague, John. 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Mason, Lilliana, and Aarøe, Lene. 2015. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review 109(1): 117.Google Scholar
Hui, Iris. 2013. “Who Is Your Preferred Neighbor? Partisan Residential Preferences and Neighborhood Satisfaction.” American Politics Research 41(6): 9971021.Google Scholar
Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Andrew. 2016. “New comScore Traffic Report Underlines the Strength of Facebook, Rise of Snapchat.” Social Media Today (March 31).Google Scholar
Ingram, Mathew. 2015. “TV Engagement Secrets from Twitter, Everyone’s Favorite Second Screen.” Fortune (September 21).Google Scholar
Isaac, Mike. 2016. “Facebook Mounts Effort to Limit Tide of Fake News.” The New York Times (December 15).Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 405431.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto and Hahn, Kyu S.. 2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication 59(1): 1939.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto and Westwood, Sean J.. 2015. “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59(3): 690707.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2011. “Informational Interdependence: Public Opinion and the Media in the New Communications Era,” in Shapiro, Robert and Jacobs, Lawrence (eds.), Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 321.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2006. “The Polls: Polarized Opinion in the States: Partisan Differences in Approval Ratings of Governors, Senators, and George W. Bush.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 36(4): 732757.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2004. “Explaining the Ideological Polarization of the Congressional Parties in the Postwar Era.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(3): 474475.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent and Zeitner, Vicki. 2003. “Internet Use and Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67(3): 311334.Google Scholar
Jetten, Jolanda, Spears, Russell, and Postmes, Tom. 2004. “Intergroup Distinctiveness and Differentiation: A Meta-Analytic Integration.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86(6): 862879.Google Scholar
Jones, Edward E. and McGillis, Daniel. 1976. “Correspondent Inferences and the Attribution Cube: A Comparative Reappraisal,” in Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W., and Kidd, R. F. (eds.), New Directions in Attribution Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, vol. 1, pp. 389420.Google Scholar
Jones, Jason J., Settle, Jaime E., Bond, Robert M., et al. 2013. “Inferring Tie Strength from Online Directed Behavior.” PLoS ONE 8(1): e52168.Google Scholar
Jones, Jason J., Bond, Robert M., Bakshy, Eytan, et al. 2017. “Social Influence and Political Mobilization: Further Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election.” PLoS ONE 12(4): e0173851.Google Scholar
Jost, John T. 2006. “The End of the End of Ideology.” American Psychologist 61(7): 651670.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Federico, Christopher M., and Napier, Jaime L.. 2009. “Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities.” Annual Review of Psychology 60(1): 307337.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., and Sulloway, Frank J.. 2003. “Exceptions that Prove the Rule – Using a Theory of Motivated Social Cognition to Account for Ideological Incongruities and Political Anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003).” Psychological Bulletin 129(3): 383393.Google Scholar
Judd, Charles M. and Johnson, Joel T.. 1981. “Attitudes, Polarization, and Diagnosticity: Exploring the Effect of Affect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41(1): 2636.Google Scholar
Jungherr, Andreas. 2016. “Twitter Use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13(1): 7291.Google Scholar
Just, Marion R. 2011. “What’s News: A View from the Twenty-First Century,” in Shapiro, Robert and Jacobs, Lawrence (eds.), Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 105121.Google Scholar
Juster, F. Thomas, Ono, Hiromi, and Stafford, Frank P.. 2003. “An Assessment of Alternative Measures of Time Use.” Sociological Methodology 33(1): 1954.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Katz, Elihu. 1957. “The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-to-Date Report on an Hypothesis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 21(1): 6178.Google Scholar
Katz, Elihu and Lazarsfeld, F. Paul. 1955. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Josh. 2016. “‘Duck Dynasty’ vs. ‘Modern Family’: 50 Maps of the U.S. Cultural Divide.” The Upshot in The New York Times, www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/26/upshot/duck-dynasty-vs-modern-family-television-maps.html.Google Scholar
Kaye, Barbara K. and Johnson, Thomas J.. 2004. “A Web for All Reasons: Uses and Gratifications of Internet Components for Political Information.” Telematics and Informatics 21(3): 197223.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Merrit. 2016. “More than 1 Million ‘Check in’ on Facebook to Support the Standing Rock Sioux.” NPR (November 1).Google Scholar
Kenski, Kate and Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2006. “Connections between Internet Use and Political Efficacy, Knowledge, and Participation.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 50(2): 173192.Google Scholar
Khan, R., Misra, K., and Singh, V.. 2013. “Ideology and Brand Consumption.” Psychological Science 24(3): 326333.Google Scholar
Kim, Tonghoon, Atkin, David J., and Lin, Carolyn A.. 2016. “The Influence of Social Networking Sites on Political Behavior: Modeling Political Involvement via Online and Offline Activity.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 60(1): 2339.Google Scholar
Kimball, David C., Summary, Bryce, and Vorst, Eric C.. 2014. “Political Identity and Party Polarization in the American Electorate,” in Green, John C., Coffey, Daniel J., and Cohen, David B. (eds.), The State of the Parties, 7th edn. Boulder, CA: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 3754.Google Scholar
Klar, Samara and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2016. Independent Politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klofstad, Casey A., Sokhey, Anand Edward, and McClurg, Scott D.. 2013. “Disagreeing about Disagreement: How Conflict in Social Networks Affects Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 120134.Google Scholar
Klofstad, Casey A., Mcdermott, Rose, and Hatemi, Peter K.. 2012. “Do Bedroom Eyes Wear Political Glasses? The Role of Politics in Human Mate Attraction.” Evolution and Human Behavior 33(2): 100108.Google Scholar
Klofstad, Casey A., McClurg, S. D., and Rolfe, M.. 2009. “Measurement of Political Discussion Networks: A Comparison of Two ‘Name Generator’ Procedures.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73(3): 462483.Google Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia. 2012. “Selective Exposure and Reinforcement of Attitudes and Partisanship before a Presidential Election.” Journal of Communication 62(4): 628642.Google Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia and Kleinman, Steven B.. 2012. “Preelection Selective Exposure: Confirmation Bias Versus Informational Utility.” Communication Research 39(2): 170193.Google Scholar
Koc, Mustafa and Gulyagci, S.. 2013. “Facebook Addiction among Turkish College Students: The Role of Psychological Health, Demographic, and Usage Characteristics.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16(4): 279284.Google Scholar
Koestner, Richard, Losier, Gaëtan F., Worren, Nicolay M., et al. 1995. “False Consensus Effects for the 1992 Canadian Referendum.” Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement 27(2): 214225.Google Scholar
Kosinski, Michal, Stillwell, David, and Graepel, Thore. 2013. “Private Traits and Attributes Are Predictable from Digital Records of Human Behavior.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(15): 58025805.Google Scholar
Kramer, Adam D. I., Guillory, Jamie E., and Hancock, Jeffrey T.. 2014. “Experimental Evidence of Massive-Scale Emotional Contagion through Social Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(24): 87888790.Google Scholar
Kreiss, Daniel. 2016. “Seizing the Moment: The Presidential Campaigns’ Use of Twitter During the 2012 Electoral Cycle.” New Media & Society 18(8): 14731490.Google Scholar
Kriner, Douglas and Shen, Francis X.. 2012. “How Citizens Respond to Combat Casualties: The Differential Impact of Local Casualties on Support for the War in Afghanistan.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(4): 761770.Google Scholar
Krueger, J. and Clement, R. W.. 1994. “The Truly False Consensus Effect: An Ineradicable and Egocentric Bias in Social Perception.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67(4): 596610.Google Scholar
Kull, Steven, Ramsay, Clay, and Lewis, Evan. 2003. “Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War.” Political Science Quarterly 118(4): 569598.Google Scholar
Kunda, Ziva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480498.Google Scholar
Laband, David N., Pandit, Ram, Sophocleus, John P., and Laband, Anne M.. 2009. “Patriotism, Pigskins, and Politics: An Empirical Examination of Expressive Behavior and Voting.” Public Choice 138(1): 97108.Google Scholar
Lake, Ronald La Due and Huckfeldt, Robert. 1998. “Social Capital, Social Networks, and Political Participation.” Political Psychology 19(3): 567584.Google Scholar
LaMarre, Heather L., Landreville, Kristen D., Young, Dannagal, and Gilkerson, Nathan. 2014. “Humor Works in Funny Ways: Examining Satirical Tone as a Key Determinant in Political Humor Message Processing.” Mass Communication and Society 17(3): 400423.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert E. 1955. “Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. By Berelson Bernard R., Lazarsfeld Paul F., and McPhee William N. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1954. Pp. Ix, 395).” American Political Science Review 49(2): 529531.Google Scholar
Lassen, David S. and Brown, Adam R.. 2010. “Twitter: The Electoral Connection?” Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, held in Chicago, Illinois, April 21–25.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Dallas. 2010. “How Political Activists Are Making the Most of Social Media.” Forbes, www.forbes.com/2010/07/15/social-media-social-activism-facebook-twitter-leadership-citizenship-burson.html.Google Scholar
Lavine, Howard G., Johnston, Christopher D., and Steenbergen, Marco R.. 2012. The Ambivalent Partisan: How Critical Loyalty Promotes Democracy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel. 1944. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Election. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.Google Scholar
Lazer, David, Rubineau, Brian, Chetkovich, Carol, et al. 2010. “The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes.” Political Communication 27(3): 248274.Google Scholar
Leasca, Stacey. 2016. “Here’s Why People Are Changing Their Facebook Profile Photos to a Red Square.” Elite Daily, http://elitedaily.com/news/facebook-profile-photo-red-square/1482528.Google Scholar
Lee, Eunsun, Kim, Yeo Jung, and Ahn, Jungsun. 2014. “How Do People Use Facebook Features to Manage Social Capital?Computers in Human Behavior 36(C): 440445.Google Scholar
Lee, Timothy. 2016. “Facebook Is Harming Our Democracy, and Mark Zuckerberg Needs to Do Something About It.” Vox.com (November 10).Google Scholar
Lee-Won, Roselyn J., Herzog, Leo, and Park, Sung Gwan. 2015. “Hooked on Facebook: The Role of Social Anxiety and Need for Social Assurance in Problematic Use of Facebook.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 18(10): 567574.Google Scholar
Lelkes, Yphtach. 2016. “Mass Polarization: Manifestations and Measurements.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1): 392410.Google Scholar
Lelkes, Yphtach, Sood, Gaurav, and Iyengar, Shanto. 2017. “The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect.” American Journal of Political Science 61(1): 520.Google Scholar
Lenhart, Amanda. 2015. “Teens, Social Media, and Technology Overview 2015.” Pew Research Center, released on April 9.Google Scholar
Lerman, K., Yan, X., and Wu, X. Z. 2016. “The ‘Majority Illusion’ in Social Networks.” PLoS ONE 11(2): e0147617.Google Scholar
Leroy, Car. 1968. “Editorial Cartoons Fail to Reach Many Viewers.” Journalism Quarterly 45: 533535.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2018. “Americans, Not Partisans: Can Priming American National Identity Reduce Affective Polarization?Journal of Politics 80(1): 5970.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2013. How Partisan Media Polarize America. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2010. “Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite Polarization.” Political Behavior 32(1): 111131.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. and Malhotra, Neil. 2016a. “(Mis)perceptions of Partisan Polarization in the American Public.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1): 378391.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. and Malhotra, Neil. 2016b. “Does Media Coverage of Partisan Polarization Affect Political Attitudes?Political Communication 33(2): 283301.Google Scholar
Levitan, Lindsey C. and Verhulst, Brad. 2016. “Conformity in Groups: The Effects of Others’ Views on Expressed Attitudes and Attitude Change.” Political Behavior 38(2): 277315.Google Scholar
Leyens, Jacques-Philippe, Yzerbyt, Vincent Y., and Schadron, Georges. 1994. Stereotypes and Social Cognition. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lind, Michael. 2016. “This Is What the Future of American Politics Looks Like.” Politico Magazine (May 22), www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/2016-election-realignment-partisan-political-party-policy-democrats-republicans-politics-213909.Google Scholar
Linville, Patricia W., Fischer, Gregory W., and Salovey, Peter. 1989. “Perceived Distributions of the Characteristics of In-Group and Out-Group Members: Empirical Evidence and a Computer Simulation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(2): 165188.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1922. Public Opinion. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lombardini, John. 2013. “Civic Laughter: Aristotle and the Political Virtue of Humor.” Political Theory 41(2): 203230.Google Scholar
Ludeke, Steven G. and Deyoung, Colin G.. 2014. “Differences in Negativity Bias Probably Underlie Variation in Attitudes toward Change Generally, Not Political Ideology Specifically.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37(3): 319320.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2015. “Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective.” Political Behavior 37(2): 331356.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2013. “Party Brands and Partisanship: Theory with Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Argentina.” American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 4964.Google Scholar
Makse, Todd and Sokhey, Anand E.. 2014. “The Displaying of Yard Signs as a Form of Political Participation.” Political Behavior 36(1): 189213.Google Scholar
Mandel, Bethany. 2017. “Facebook Dead at 12, a Victim of 2016.” The Federalist (February 1).Google Scholar
Manstead, Antony Stephen Reid. 1982. “Perceived Social Support for Opinions: A Test of the Magnitude and Diversity Hypotheses.” British Journal of Social Psychology 21(1): 3541.Google Scholar
Markowicz, Karol. 2016. “You’re Ruining Facebook (and Friendships) with Political Rants.” New York Post (October 9).Google Scholar
Marks, Gary and Miller, Norman. 1987. “Ten Years of Research on the False-Consensus Effect: An Empirical and Theoretical Review.” Psychological Bulletin 102(1): 7290.Google Scholar
Marsden, Peter V. 1987. “Core Discussion Networks of Americans.” American Sociological Review 52(1): 122131.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 128145.Google Scholar
Mattes, Kyle and Redlawsk, David P.. 2014. The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mauri, Maurizio, Cipresso, Pietro, Balgera, Anna, et al. 2011. “Why Is Facebook So Successful? Psychophysiological Measures Describe a Core Flow State While Using Facebook.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 14(12): 723731.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Justin. 2014. “Trust in Mass Media Returns to All-Time Low.” Gallup (September 17).Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McClurg, Scott D. 2006. “Political Disagreement in Context: The Conditional Effect of Neighborhood Context, Disagreement and Political Talk on Electoral Participation.” Political Behavior 28(4): 349366.Google Scholar
McCrae, Robert R. 1996. “Social Consequences of Experiential Openness.” Psychological Bulletin 120(3): 323337.Google Scholar
McGerr, Michael E. 1986. The Decline of Popular Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McLeod, Jack M., Scheufele, Dietram A., and Moy, Patricia. 1999. “Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation.” Political Communication 16(3): 315336.Google Scholar
McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Cook, James M.. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27(1): 415444.Google Scholar
McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Brashears, Matthew E.. 2006. “Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades.” American Sociological Review 71(3): 353375.Google Scholar
Meffert, Michael F., Chung, Sungeun, Joiner, Amber J., et al. 2016. “The Effects of Negativity and Motivated Information Processing During a Political Campaign.” Journal of Communication 56(1): 27–51.Google Scholar
Messing, Solomon. 2013. “Friends that Matter: How Social Transmission of Elite Discourse Shapes Political Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior.” A dissertation submitted to the Department of Communication and the Committee on Graduate Studies of Stanford University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy.Google Scholar
Messing, Solomon and Westwood, Sean J.. 2014. “Selective Exposure in the Age of Social Media: Endorsements Trump Partisan Source Affiliation When Selecting News Online.” Communication Research 41(8): 10421063.Google Scholar
Meyrowitz, Joshua. 1986. No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, P. R. and Conover, P. J.. 2015. “Red and Blue States of Mind: Partisan Hostility and Voting in the United States.” Political Research Quarterly 68(2): 225239.Google Scholar
Milligan, Susan. 2016. “In 2016 the Culture War Favors the Democrats.” U.S. News.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Amy, Gottfried, Jeffrey, Kiley, Jocelyn, and Matsa, Katerina Eva. 2014. “Political Polarization & Media Habits.” Pew Research Center, www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Amy, Jurkowitz, Mark, Enda, Jodi, and Olmstead, Kenny. 2013. “How Americans Get TV News at Home.” Pew Research Center, report released October 11.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 2010. Personality and the Foundations of Political Behavior. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. and Halperin, Karen D.. 2008. “A Framework for the Study of Personality and Political Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science 38(2): 335362.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J., Hibbing, Matthew V., Canache, Damarys, et al. 2010. “Personality and Civic Engagement: An Integrative Framework for the Study of Trait Effects on Political Behavior.” American Political Science Review 104(1): 85110.Google Scholar
Moreton, Bethany. 2009. To Serve God and Wal-Mart. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, Kimberly Rios and Matthes, Jörg. 2011. “Socially Motivated Projection: Need to Belong Increases Perceived Opinion Consensus on Important Issues.” European Journal of Social Psychology 41(6): 707719.Google Scholar
Mullen, Brian, Atkins, Jennifer L., Champion, Debbie S., et al. 1985. “The False Consensus Effect: A Meta-Analysis of 115 Hypothesis Tests.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21(3): 262283.Google Scholar
Mullinix, Kevin J., Leeper, Thomas J., Druckman, James N., and Freese, Jeremy. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2(2): 109138.Google Scholar
Mummolo, Jonathan. 2016. “News from the Other Side: How Topic Relevance Limits the Prevalence of Partisan Selective Exposure.” The Journal of Politics 78(3): 763773.Google Scholar
Munger, Kevin, Egan, Patrick, Nagler, Jonathan, and Tucker, Joshua. 2015. “Political Knowledge and Misinformation in the Era of Social Media: Evidence from the 2015 U.K. Election.” Paper presented at the APSA Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2008. “Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory?Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 521538.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana 2006a. “How the Mass Media Divide Us,” in Nivola, Pietro S. and Brady, David W. (eds.), Red and Blue Nation?: Consequences and Correction of America’s Polarized Politics. Baltimore, MD: Brookings Institution Press, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2006b. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2002. “The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 838855.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 1998. Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., and Richards, J. M.. 2003. “Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Style.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29: 665675.Google Scholar
Newport, Frank. 2017. “Democrats Say Their Leaders Should Not Compromise with Trump.” Gallup (March 31).Google Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P. 2012. “Polarizing Cues.” American Journal of Political Science 56(1): 5266.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P., Coe, Chelsea M., and Song, Anna V.. 2016. “The Politics of Beauty: The Effects of Partisan Bias on Physical Attractiveness.” Political Behavior 38(4): 883898.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P. and Hansford, Thomas G.. 2014. “Partisans in Robes: Party Cues and Public Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 58(3): 620636.Google Scholar
Nisbett, Richard E. and Borgida, Eugene. 1975. “Attribution and the Psychology of Prediction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(5): 932.Google Scholar
Noelle‐Neumann, Elisabeth. 1974. “The Spiral of Silence: A Theory of Public Opinion.” Journal of Communication 24(2): 4351.Google Scholar
Norman, Donald A. 1999. “Affordance, Conventions, and Design.” Interactions 6(3): 3843.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2001. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan. 2010. “Why the ‘Death Panel’ Myth Wouldn’t Die: Misinformation in the Health Care Reform Debate.” The Forum 8(1): 15.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan. 2012. “Does the US Media Have a Liberal Bias?Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 767771.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan and Reifler, Jason. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior 32(2): 303330.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. Eric, Wood, Thomas, and Bass, Alexandra. 2016. “Liberellas Versus Konservatives: Social Status, Ideology, and Birth Names in the United States.” Political Behavior 38(1): 5581.Google Scholar
Olson, Parmy. 2013. “The Evolution of Facebook.” Forbes, www.forbes.com/pictures/edee45edklh/the-evolution-of-facebook-4/#da8b0ea456dc.Google Scholar
O’Neil, Cathy. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
O’Shea, Heather. 2016. “New Research: TV Viewers Who Engage on Twitter Have Higher Rates of Ad Recall.” Twitter (March 18).Google Scholar
Padgett, Jeremy. 2014. “Predictors of National Broadcast and Cable Television News Coverage of the Members of the US House of Representatives.” Doctoral dissertation, Manship School of Mass Communication, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
Park, Bernadette and Judd, Charles M.. 1990. “Measures and Models of Perceived Group Variability.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(2): 173191.Google Scholar
Park, Bernadette and Rothbart, Myron. 1982. “Perception of Out-Group Homogeneity and Levels of Social Categorization: Memory for the Subordinate Attributes of In-Group and Out-Group Members.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42(6): 10511068.Google Scholar
Park, Bernadette and Hastie, Reid. 1987. “Perception of Variability in Category Development: Instance- Versus Abstraction-Based Stereotypes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(4): 621635.Google Scholar
Park, Chang Sup. 2015. “Pathways to Expressive and Collective Participation: Usage Patterns, Political Efficacy, and Political Participation in Social Networking Sites.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 59(4): 698716.Google Scholar
Parsons, Bryan M. 2015. “The Social Identity Politics of Peer Networks.” American Politics Research 43(4): 680707.Google Scholar
Pelli, Denis G. and Bigelow, Charles. 2009. “A Writing Revolution.” Seed Magazine.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Frazee, J., et al. 2014. “When Small Words Foretell Academic Success: The Case of College Admissions Essays.” PLoS ONE 9(12): 110.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., and Blackburn, K.. 2015. The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015. University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Perdue, C. W., Dovidio, J. F., and Gurtman, M. B.. 1990. “Us and Them: Social Categorization and the Process of Intergroup Bias.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(3): 475486.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F. 1998. “Intergroup Contact Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology 49(1): 6585.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F. and Tropp, Linda R.. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(5): 751784.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F., Tropp, Linda R., Wagner, Ulrich, and Christ, Oliver. 2011. “Recent Advances in Intergroup Contact Theory.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 35(3): 271280.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2016a. “Partisanship and Political Animosity.” Released June 22.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2016b. “As Election Nears, Voters Divided over Democracy and ‘Respect.’” Released October 27.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2014a. “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Released June 12.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2014b. “Political Polarization and Media Habits.” Released October 21.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. “D-Nominate after 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26(1): 529.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 1984. “The Polarization of American Politics.” The Journal of Politics 46(4): 10611079.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Post, Anna. “Avoid Political Pitfalls When Talking, Working and Posting,” available at http://emilypost.com/advice/avoid-political-pitfalls/.Google Scholar
Powers, W. 2010. Hamlet’s Blackberry: A Practical Philosophy for Building a Good Life in the Digital Age. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2013. “Media and Political Polarization.” Annual Review of Political Science 16(1): 101127.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2003. “Any Good News in Soft News? The Impact of Soft News Preference on Political KnowledgePolitical Communication 20(2): 149171.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus, Sood, Gaurav, and Khanna, Kabir. 2015. “You Cannot Be Serious: The Impact of Accuracy Incentives on Partisan Bias in Reports of Economic Perceptions.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10(4): 489518.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus and Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2015. “Using Mobilization, Media, and Motivation to Curb Political Polarization,” in Persily, Nathaniel (ed.), Solutions to Political Polarization in America. Cambridge University Press, pp. 178194.Google Scholar
Quattrone, George A. and Jones, Edward E.. 1980. “The Perception of Variability Within In-Groups and Out-Groups: Implications for the Law of Small Numbers.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38(1): 141152.Google Scholar
Rainie, Lee. 2012. “Social Media and Voting.” Pew Research Center, released November 6.Google Scholar
Rainie, Lee and Smith, Aaron. 2012. “Politics on Social Networking Sites.” Pew Research Center, released September 4.Google Scholar
Robinson, Robert J., Keltner, Dacher, Ward, Andrew, and Lee, Ross. 1995. “Actual Versus Assumed Differences in Construal: ‘Naive Realism’ in Intergroup Perception and Conflict.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68(3): 404417.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Jon C. and Sutherland, Joseph L.. 2016. “How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization.” Political Behavior 38(2): 485508.Google Scholar
Ross, L., Greene, D., and House, P. 1977. “The ‘False Consensus Effect’: An Egocentric Bias in Social Perception and Attribution Processes.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13(3): 279301.Google Scholar
Ross, Lee and Ward, Andrew. 1995. “Psychological Barriers to Dispute Resolution.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 27: 255304.Google Scholar
Rutchick, Abraham M., Smyth, Joshua M., and Konrath, Sara. 2009. “Seeing Red (and Blue): Effects of Electoral College Depictions on Political Group Perception.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 9(1): 269282.Google Scholar
Saunders, Kyle L. and Abramowitz, Alan I.. 2004. “Ideological Realignment and Active Partisans in the American Electorate.” American Politics Research 32(3): 285309.Google Scholar
Schreiber, Darren. 2007. “Political Cognition as Social Cognition: Are We All Political Sophisticates?” in Crigler, A., MacKuen, M., Marcus, G. E., and Neuman, W. R. (eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael. 1998. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O. and Freedman, Jonathan L.. 1967. “Selective Exposure to Information: A Critical Review.” Public Opinion Quarterly 31(2): 194213.Google Scholar
Segreti, Giulia. 2016. “Facebook CEO Says Group Will Not Become a Media Company.” Reuters (August 29).Google Scholar
Settle, Jaime E. 2018. “Moving Beyond Sentiment Analysis: Social Media and Emotions in Political Communication,” in Foucault-Welles, Brooke and Bailon, Sandra Gonzalez (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Networked Communication. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Settle, Jaime E. 2012. “Political Competition, Emotions, and Voting: The Moderating Role of Individual Differences.” Order No. 3512751, University of California, San Diego, https://proxy.wm.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1024426440?accountid=15053.Google Scholar
Settle, Jaime E., Bond, Robert M., Coviello, Lorenzo, et al. 2016. “From Posting to Voting: The Effects of Political Competition on Online Political Engagement.” Political Science Research and Methods 4(2): 361378.Google Scholar
Seyle, D. Conor and Newman, Matthew L.. 2006. “A House Divided? The Psychology of Red and Blue America.” American Psychologist 61(6): 571580.Google Scholar
Shane, Scott. 2017. “From Headline to Photograph, a Fake News Masterpiece.” The New York Times (January 18).Google Scholar
Sherif, Muzafer and Sherif, Carolyn W.. 1953. Groups in Harmony and Tension: An Integration of Studies of Intergroup Relations. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Sherif, Muzafer, Harvey, O. J., White, Jack, et al. 1961. Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.Google Scholar
Sherman, David K., Nelson, Leif D., and Ross, Lee D.. 2003. “Naïve Realism and Affirmative Action: Adversaries Are More Similar than They Think.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 25(4): 275289.Google Scholar
Sherman, David K., Hogg, Michael A., and Maitner, Angela T.. 2009. “Perceived Polarization: Reconciling Ingroup and Intergroup Perceptions under Uncertainty.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 12(1): 95109.Google Scholar
Shi, Feng, Shi, Yongren, Dokshin, Fedor A., et al. 2017. “Millions of Online Book Co-Purchases Reveal Partisan Differences in the Consumption of Science.” Nature Human Behaviour 1(4): 79.Google Scholar
Shin, Youngsoo, Kim, Minji, Im, Chaerin, and Chong, Sang Chul. 2017. “Selfie and Self: The Effect of Selfies on Self-Esteem and Social Sensitivity.” Personality and Individual Differences 111: 139145.Google Scholar
Shirky, Clay. 2008. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Silverman, Craig. 2016. “This Analysis Shows How Viral Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News on Facebook.” BuzzFeed (November 16).Google Scholar
Sinclair, Betsy. 2012. The Social Citizen: Peer Networks and Political Behavior. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Slothuus, Rune and De Vreese, Claes H.. 2010. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects.” The Journal of Politics 72(3): 630645.Google Scholar
Smith, Aaron. 2014a. “Cell Phones, Social Media, and Campaign 2014.” Pew Research Center (November 3).Google Scholar
Smith, Aaron. 2014b. “Six New Facts about Facebook.” Pew Research Center’s Fact Tank Blog (February 3).Google Scholar
Smith, Aaron. 2013. “Civic Engagement in the Digital Age.” Pew Research Center, published April 25.Google Scholar
Sokhey, Anand E. and Djupe, Paul A.. 2013. “Name Generation in Ego-Centric Network Data: Results from a Series of Experiments.” Social Networks 36: 147161.Google Scholar
Standage, Tom. 2013. Writing on the Wall: Social Media – The First Two Thousand Years. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Standage, Tom. 1998. The Victorian Internet. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Stanley, Harold. W., Bianco, William T., and Niemi, Richard G.. 1986. “Partisanship and Group Support over Time: A Multivariate Analysis.” American Political Science Review 80(3): 969976.Google Scholar
Starr, Paul. 2005. The Creation of the Media: Political Origins of Modern Communications. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stewart, James. 2016. “Facebook Has 50 Minutes of Your Time Each Day. It Wants More.” The New York Times (May 5).Google Scholar
Stinson, Liz. 2016. “Facebook Reactions, the Totally Redesigned Like Button, Is Here.” Wired, www.wired.com/2016/02/facebook-reactions-totally-redesigned-like-button.Google Scholar
Stonecash, Jeffrey M., Brewer, Mark D., and Mariani, Mack D.. 2003. Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2011. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2010. “Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure.” Journal of Communication 60(3): 556576.Google Scholar
Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2008. “Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure.” Political Behavior 30(3): 341366.Google Scholar
Stroud, Natalie Jomini, Scacco, J. M., Muddiman, A., and Curry, A. L.. 2015. “Changing Deliberative Norms on News Organizations’ Facebook Sites.” Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication 20(2): 188203.Google Scholar
Stump, Scott. 2016. “Sheryl Sandberg on Facebook and Fake News: ‘We Don’t Think It Swayed the Election,’” NBC Today Show (December 8).Google Scholar
Sundar, S. Shyam and Limperos, Anthony M.. 2013. “Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for New Media.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57(4): 504525.Google Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Taber, Charles S., Cann, Damon, and Kucsova, Simona. 2009. “The Motivated Processing of Political Arguments.” Political Behavior 31(2): 137155.Google Scholar
Taber, Charles S. and Lodge, Milton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 755769.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1982. “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology 33(1): 139.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1970. “Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination.” Scientific American 223(5): 96103.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1969. “Cognitive Aspects of Prejudice.” Journal of Biosocial Science 1(S1): 173191.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1959. “Quantitative Judgement in Social Perception.” British Journal of Psychology 50(1): 1629.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri and Wilkes, Alan L.. 1963. “Classification and Quantitative Judgement.” British Journal of Psychology 54(2): 101114.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri and Turner, John C.. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict,” in Austin, W. G. and Worchel, S. (eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, pp. 3347.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., and Flament, Claude. 1971. “Social Categorization and Intergroup Behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology 1(2): 149178.Google Scholar
Tang, Gary and Lee, Francis L. F.. 2013. “Facebook Use and Political Participation: The Impact of Exposure to Shared Political Information, Connections with Public Political Actors, and Network Structural Heterogeneity.” Social Science Computer Review 31(6): 763773.Google Scholar
Tavernise, Sabrina. 2016. “Young Adolescents as Likely to Die from Suicide as from Traffic Accidents.” The New York Times (November 3).Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497520.Google Scholar
Thomsen, Danielle M. 2014. “Ideological Moderates Won’t Run: How Party Fit Matters for Partisan Polarization in Congress.” The Journal of Politics 76(3): 786797.Google Scholar
Thornton, Judd R. 2013. “The Impact of Elite Polarization on Partisan Ambivalence and Indifference.” Political Behavior 35(2): 409428.Google Scholar
Tufecki, Zeynup. 2012. “Social Media’s Small, Positive Role in Human Relationships.” Atlantic (April 25).Google Scholar
Turkle, Sherry. 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Ourselves. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Turner, John C. 1999. “Some Current Issues in Research on Social Identity and Self-Categorization Theories,” in Ellemers, Naomi, Spears, Russell, and Doosje, Bertjan (eds.), Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 634.Google Scholar
Turner, John C. 1981. “The Experimental Social Psychology of Intergroup Behavior,” in Turner, John C. and Giles, Howard (eds.), Intergroup Behaviour. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 66101.Google Scholar
Turner, John C., Hogg, Michael A., Oakes, Penelope J., et al. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185(4157): 11241131.Google Scholar
Ulbig, Stacy G. and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1999. “Conflict Avoidance and Political Participation.” Political Behavior 21(3): 265282.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Sebastián, Kim, Yonghwan, and de Zúñiga, Homero Gil. 2012. “Social Networks that Matter: Exploring the Role of Political Discussion for Online Political Participation.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24(2): 163184.Google Scholar
Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2004. Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, Brian E., Ardèvol-Abreu, Alberto, and de Zúñiga, Homero Gil. 2017. “Online Influence? Social Media Use, Opinion Leadership, and Political Persuasion.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 29(2): 214239.Google Scholar
Westfall, Jacob, Van Boven, Leaf, Chambers, John R., and Judd, Charles M.. 2015. “Perceiving Political Polarization in the United States: Party Identity Strength and Attitude Extremity Exacerbate the Perceived Partisan Divide.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 10(2): 145158.Google Scholar
Williams, Bruce A. and Delli Carpini, Michael X.. 2011. After Broadcast News: Media Regimes, Democracy and the New Information Environment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Glenn D., Ausman, James, and Mathews, Thomas R.. 1973. “Conservatism and Art Preferences.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25(2): 286288.Google Scholar
Wojcieszak, Magdalena and Price, Vincent. 2009. “What Underlies the False Consensus Effect? How Personal Opinion and Disagreement Affect Perception of Public Opinion.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 21(1): 2546.Google Scholar
Yang, Jung Hwan, Rojas, Hernando, Wojcieszak, Magdalena, et al. 2016. “Why Are “Others” So Polarized? Perceived Political Polarization and Media Use in 10 Countries.” Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication 21(5): 349367.Google Scholar
Young, Dannagal. 2006. “Late-Night Comedy and the Salience of the Candidates’ Caricatured Traits in the 2000 Election.” Mass Communication & Society 9(3): 339366.Google Scholar
Younge, Gary. 2012. “Election 2012: The Return of Culture Wars.” The Guardian, www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/feb/10/election-2012-return-culture-wars.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zschirnt, Simon. 2011. “The Origins & Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications Revisited.” Political Behavior 33(4): 685701.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Jaime E. Settle, College of William and Mary, Virginia
  • Book: Frenemies
  • Online publication: 17 August 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560573.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Jaime E. Settle, College of William and Mary, Virginia
  • Book: Frenemies
  • Online publication: 17 August 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560573.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Jaime E. Settle, College of William and Mary, Virginia
  • Book: Frenemies
  • Online publication: 17 August 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560573.010
Available formats
×