Imaginary Friends: How Imaginary Minds Mimic Real Life

doi:10.1017/9781108580298.023

23 - Imaginary Friends: How Imaginary Minds Mimic Real Life

from Part III - Intentionality-Based Forms of the Imagination

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2020

Paige E. Davis

Edited by

Anna Abraham

Show author details

Anna Abraham: Affiliation:
University of Georgia

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter examines the relationship between mental state reasoning skills and imagination; specifically how and why children who create imaginary companions (ICs) differ in these skills from children who do not have imaginary playmates. This chapter introduces mental state reasoning, and explains its links to imagination and other variables, while exploring how this construct is measured. It then moves on to investigate IC play and consider how a child’s creation of a pretend mind is thought to improve his or her ability to reason about real minds. The chapter also includes a short history of the imaginary companion, as well as an overview of how science has viewed this construct, a clarification of what type of play is classified as IC play, and which groups of children might be more likely to play with these entities. Toward the end of the chapter, research on mental state reasoning and IC status is reviewed, and theoretical viewpoints on why these children excel in mental state reasoning are laid out. The chapter closes with a discussion of future explorations for this field in terms of causal direction and new forms of therapeutic play intervention.

Keywords

Imaginary companions mental state reasoning theory of mind pretend play creating another mind

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination , pp. 373 - 389

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580298.023 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Astington, J. W., and Baird, J. A. (eds.) (2005). Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Astington, J. W., and Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A Longitudinal Study of the Relation between Language and Theory-of-Mind Development. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1311–1320.Google Scholar

Bauer, K. L., and Dettore, E. (1997). Superhero Play: What’s a Teacher to Do? Early Childhood Education Journal, 25(1), 17–21.CrossRef Google Scholar

Boone, O., Canetti, L., Bachar, E., De-Nour, A. K., and Shaley, A. (1999). Childhood Imaginary Companionship and Mental Health in Adolescence. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 29(4), 277–286.Google Scholar

Bouldin, P. (2006). An Investigation of the Fantasy Predisposition and Fantasy Style of Children with Imaginary Companions. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167(1), 17–29.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bouldin, P., and Pratt, C. (1999). Characteristics of Preschool and School-Age Children with Imaginary Companions. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160(4), 397–410.Google Scholar

Carlson, S. M., and Taylor, M. (2005). Imaginary Companions and Impersonated Characters: Sex Differences in Children’s Fantasy Play. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly Journal of Developmental Psychology, 51(1), 93–118.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cassidy, K. W., Fineberg, D. S., Brown, K., Perkins, A. (2005). Theory of Mind May Be Contagious, but You Don’t Catch It from Your Twin. Child Development, 76(1), 97–106.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cutting, A. L., and Dunn, J. (1999). Theory of Mind, Emotion Understanding, Language, and Family Background; Individual Differences and Interrelations. Child Development, 70(4), 853–865.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Davis, P. E. (2011). Does Having an Imaginary Companion Relate to Children’s Understanding of Self and Others? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Durham, UK: Durham University.Google Scholar

Davis, P.E., Meins, E., and Fernyhough, C. (2011). Self-Knowledge in Childhood: Relations with Children’s Imaginary Companions and Understanding of Mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 680–686.Google Scholar

Davis, P.E., Meins, E., and Fernyhough, C. (2013). Individual Differences in Children’s Private Speech: The Role of Imaginary Companions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 561–571.Google Scholar

Davis, P.E., Meins, E., and Fernyhough, C. (2014). Children with Imaginary Companions Focus on Mental Characteristics when Describing Their Real-Life Friends. Journal of Infant and Child Development, 23(3), 622–633.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Davis, P. E., Simon, H., Robins, D., and Meins, E. (2018). Imaginary Companions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(8), 2790–2799.Google Scholar

Dunn, J., Brown, J., and Beardsall, L. (1991). Family Talk about Feeling States and Children’s Later Understanding of Others’ Emotions. Developmental Psychology, 27(3), 448–455.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fernyhough, C., Bland, K. A., Meins, E., and Coltheart, M. (2007). Imaginary Companions and Young Children’s Responses to Ambiguous Auditory Stimuli: Implications for Typical and Atypical Development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(11), 1094–1101.Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H., Flavell, E. R., and Green, F. L. (1983). Development of the Appearance-Reality Distinction. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 95–120.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Flavell, J. H., Flavell, E. R., and Green, F. L. (1987). Young Children’s Knowledge about the Apparent-Real and Pretend-Real Distinctions. Developmental Psychology, 23, 816–822.Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L., and Flavell, E. R. (1993). Children’s Understanding of the Stream of Consciousness. Child Development, 64, 387–398.Google Scholar

Giménez-Dasí, M., Pons, F., and Bender, P. (2016). Imaginary Companions, Theory of Mind and Emotion Understanding in Young Children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(2), 186–197.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gleason, T. R. (2002). Social Provisions of Real and Imaginary Relationships in Early Childhood. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 979–992.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gleason, T. R. (2004). Imaginary Companions: An Evaluation of Parents as Reporters. Journal of Infant and Child Development, 13(3), 199–215.Google Scholar

Gleason, T. R. (2005). Mothers’ and Fathers’ Attitudes Regarding Pretend Play in the Context of Imaginary Companions and of Child Gender. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly Journal of Developmental Psychology, 51(4), 412–436.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gleason, T. R. (2017). The Psychological Significance of Play with Imaginary Companions in Early Childhood. Learning Behaviour, 45, 432–440.Google Scholar

Gleason, T. R., and Hohmann, L. M. (2006). Concepts of Real and Imaginary Friendships in Early Childhood. Social Development, 15(1), 128–144.Google Scholar

Gleason, T. R., and Kalpidou, M. (2014). Imaginary Companions and Young Children’s Coping and Competence. Social Development, 23(4), 820–839.Google Scholar

Gleason, T. R., Sebanc, A. M., and Hartup, W. W. (2000). Imaginary Companions of Preschool Children. Developmental Psychology, 36(4), 419–428.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Golomb, C., and Galasso, L. (1995). Make Believe and Reality: Explorations of the Imaginary Realm. Developmental Psychology, 31(5), 800–810.Google Scholar

Gupta, A., and Desai, N. G. (2006). Pathological Fantasy Friend Phenomenon. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 149–151.Google Scholar

Harris, P. L. (2000). The Work of the Imagination. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harter, S., and Chao, C. (1992). Role of Competence in Children’s Creation of Imaginary Friends. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38(3), 350–363.Google Scholar

Hoff, E. V. (2004). A Friend Living Inside Me – The Forms and Functions of Imaginary Companions. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 24(2), 151–189.Google Scholar

Hughes, C., Adlam, A., Happé, F., et al. (2008). Good Test-Retest Reliability for Standard and Advanced False Belief Tasks Across a Wide Range of Abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 483–490.Google Scholar

Hughes, C., Fujisawa, K. K., Ensor, R., Lecce, S., and Marfleet, R. (2006). Cooperation and Conversations about the Mind: A Study of Individual Differences in 2-Year-Olds and Their Siblings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 53–72.Google Scholar

Jarrold, C. (2003). A Review of Research into Pretend Play in Autism. Autism, 7(4), 379–390.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jenkins, J. M., Turrell, S. L., Kogushi, Y., Lollis, S., and Ross, H. S. (2003). A Longitudinal Investigation of the Dynamics of Mental State Talk in Families. Child Development, 74(3), 905–920.Google Scholar

Ketelaars, M. P., van Weerdenburg, M., Verhoeven, L., Cuperus, J. M., and Jansonius, K. (2010). Dynamics of the Theory of Mind Construct: A Developmental Perspective. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7(1), 85–103.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kirk, E., Pine, K., Wheatley, L., et al. (2015). A Longitudinal Investigation of the Relationship between Maternal Mind-Mindedness and Theory of Mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 434–445.Google Scholar

Klausen, E., and Passman, R. H. (2007). Pretend Companions (Imaginary Playmates): The Emergence of a Field. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167(4), 349–364.Google Scholar

Leach, J., Howe, N., and DeHart, G. (2016). “I Wish My People Can Be like the Ducks”: Children’s References to Internal States with Siblings and Friends from Early to Middle Childhood. Infant and Child Development, 26e.Google Scholar

Leblanc, É., Bernier, A., and Howe, N. (2017). The More the Merrier? Sibling Composition and Early Manifestations of Theory of Mind in Toddlers. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18(3), 375–391.Google Scholar

Lewis, C., and Mitchell, P. (eds.). (1994). Children’s Early Understanding of Mind: Origins and Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Lillard, A. S. (2017). Why Do the Children (Pretend) Play? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(11), 826–834.Google Scholar

Lillard, A. S., and Kavanaugh, R. D. (2014). The Contribution of Symbolic Skills to the Development of an Explicit Theory of Mind. Child Development. 85(4), 1535–1551.CrossRef Google Scholar

Manosevitz, M., Prentice, N. M., and Wilson, F. (1973). Individual and Family Correlates of Imaginary Companions in Preschool Children. Developmental Psychology, 8(1), 72–79.Google Scholar

McAlister, A., and Peterson, C. (2007). A Longitudinal Study of Child Siblings and Theory of Mind Development. Cognitive Development, 22(2), 258–270.Google Scholar

McInnis, M. A., Pierucci, J. M., and Gilpin, A. T. (2013). Investigating Valence and Autonomy in Children’s Relationships with Imaginary Companions. International Journal of Developmental Science, 7, 151–159.CrossRef Google Scholar

Meins, E. (1997). Security of Attachment and the Social Development of Cognition. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., de Rosnay, , et al. (2012). Mind-Mindedness as a Multidimensional Construct: Appropriate and Nonattuned Mind-Related Comments Independently Predict Infant-Mother Attachment in a Socially Diverse Sample. Infancy, 17(4), 393–415.Google Scholar

Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Johnson, F., and Lidstone, J. (2006). Mind-Mindedness in Children: Individual Differences in Internal-State Talk in Middle Childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 181–196.Google Scholar

Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Wainwright, R., et al. (2002). Maternal Mind-Mindedness and Attachment Security as Predictors of Theory of Mind Understanding. Child Development, 73(6), 1715–1726.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Moriguchi, Y., Kanakogi, Y., Todo, N., et al. (2016). Goal Attribution toward Non-Human Objects during Infancy Predicts Imaginary Companion Status during Preschool Years. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 221.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Moriguchi, Y., and Shinohara, I. (2012). My Neighbor: Children’s Perception of Agency in Interactions with an Imaginary Agent. PLoS One, 7(9), e44463.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Motoshima, Y., Shinohara, I., Todo, N., and Moriguchi, Y. (2014). Parental Behavior and Children’s Creation of Imaginary Companions: A Longitudinal Study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(6), 716–727.Google Scholar

Pearson, D., Rouse, H., Doswell, S., et al. (2001). Prevalence of Imaginary Companions in a Normal Child Population. Child Care, Health and Development, 27(1), 13–22.CrossRef Google Scholar

Perner, J., Ruffman, T., and Leekam, S. R. (1994). Theory of Mind Is Contagious: You Catch It from Your Sibs. Child Development, 65, 1228–1238.Google Scholar

Premack, D., and Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526.Google Scholar

Repacholi, B. M., and Gopnik, A. (1997). Early Reasoning about Desires: Evidence from 14- and 18-Month-Olds. Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 12–21.Google Scholar

Roby, A. C., and Kidd, E. (2008). The Referential Communication Skills of Children with Imaginary Companions. Developmental Science, 11(4), 531–540.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ruffman, T., Perner, J., Naito, M., Parkin, L., and Clements, W. A. (1998). Older (But Not Younger) Siblings Facilitate False-Belief Understanding. Developmental Psychology, 34(1), 161–174.Google Scholar

Ruffman, T., Slade, L., and Crowe, E. (2002). The Relation Between Children’s and Mothers’ Mental State Language and Theory-of-Mind Understanding. Child Development, 73(3), 734–751.Google Scholar

Seiffge-Krenke, I. (1997). Imaginary Companions in Adolescence: Sign of a Deficit or Positive Development? Journal of Adolescence, 20, 137–154.Google Scholar

Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2001). “Dear Kitty, You Asked Me …”: Imaginary Companions and Real Friends in Adolescence. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und kinderpsychiatrie, 50(1), 1–15.Google Scholar

Sharon, T., and Woolley, D. (2004). Do Monsters Dream? Young Children’s Understanding of the Fantasy/Reality Distinction. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 293–310.Google Scholar

Shatz, M., Diesendruck, G., Martinez-Beck, I., and Akar, D. (2003). The Influence of Language and Socioeconomic Status on Children’s Understanding of False Belief. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 717–729.Google Scholar

Singer, D. G., and Singer, J. L. (1990). The House of Make-Believe: Children’s Play and the Developing Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Skolnick, D., and Bloom, P. (2006). What Does Batman Think about SpongeBob? Children’s Understanding of the Fantasy/Fantasy Distinction. Cognition 101, 1, B9–B18.Google Scholar

Slaughter, V., Dennis, M. J., and Pritchard, M. (2002). Theory of Mind and Peer Acceptance in Preschool Children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 545–564.CrossRef Google Scholar

Suway, J. G., Degan, K. A., Sussman, A. L., and Fox, N. A. (2012).The Relations Among Theory of Mind, Behavioural Inhibition, and Peer Interactions in Early Childhood. Social Development, 21(2), 331–342.Google Scholar

Svendsen, M. (1934). Children’s Imaginary Companions. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 2, 985–999.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tahiroglu, D., Mannering, A. M., and Taylor, M. (2011). Visual and Auditory Imagery Associated with Children’s Imaginary Companions. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 31(1–2), 99–112.Google Scholar

Taylor, M. (1999). Imaginary Companions and the Children Who Create Them. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, M., and Carlson, S. (1997). The Relation between Individual Differences in Fantasy and Theory of Mind. Child Development, 68(3), 436–455.Google Scholar

Taylor, M., and Carlson, S. (2002). Imaginary Companions and Elaborate Fantasy in Childhood: Discontinuity with Non-Human Animals. In Mitchell, R (ed.), Pretending and Imagination in Animals and Children. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 67–180.Google Scholar

Taylor, M., Carlson, S. M., Maring, B. L., Gerow, L., and Charley, C. M. (2004). The Characteristics and Correlates of Fantasy in School-Age Children: Imaginary Companions, Impersonation, and Social Understanding. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1173–1187.Google Scholar

Taylor, M., Carlson, S. M., and Shawber, A. B. (2007). Autonomy and Control in Children’s Interactions with Imaginary Companions. In Roth, I (ed.), Imaginative Minds. Oxford, UK: British Academy and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, M., Hodges, S. D., and Kohanyi, A. (2003). The Characters Created by Adult Novelists and the Imaginary Companions Created by Children. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 22, 361–380.Google Scholar

Taylor, M., Sachet, A. B., Maring, B. L., and Mannering, A. M. (2013). The Assessment of Elaborated Role-Play in Young Children: Invisible Friends, Personified Objects, and Pretend Identities. Social Development, 22(1), 75–93.Google Scholar

Trionfi, G., and Reese, E. (2009). A Good Story: Children with Imaginary Companions Create Richer Narratives. Child Development, 80(4), 1301–1313.Google Scholar

Vostrovsky, C. (1895). A Study of Imaginary Companions. Education, 15, 383–398.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1931/1993). The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 2: The Fundamentals of Defectology. Edited by R.W. Reiber and A. S. Carton. Translated by J. E. Knox and C. B. Stevens. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1931/1998). The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 5: Child Psychology. Edited by Reiber., R. W. Translated by M. J. Hall. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar

Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., and Watson, J. (2001). Meta-Analysis of Theory-of-Mind Development: The Truth about False Belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684.Google Scholar

Wellman, H. M., and Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of Theory-of-Mind Tasks. Child Development, 75(2), 523–541.Google Scholar

Wigger, J. B. (2017). Invisible Friends Across Four Countries: Kenya, Malawi, Nepal, and the Dominican Republic. International Journal of Psychology, 53(1), 46–52.Google Scholar

Wigger, J. B., Paxson, K., and Ryan, L. (2013). What Do Invisible Friends Know? Imaginary Companions, God, and Theory of Mind. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 23, 2–14.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H., and Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about Beliefs: Representation and Constraining Function of Wrong Beliefs in Young Children’s Understanding of Deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.Google Scholar

Wood, D., Bruner, J., and Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Child Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.Google Scholar

Woolley, J. D. (2003). The Fantasy/Reality Distinction Revisited: The Case of Imaginary Companions. Social Development, 12(4), 622–625.Google Scholar

Woolley, J. D., and Ma, L. (2009). Children’s Use of Conversational Cues to Infer Reality Status. In A. Gopnick (chair), The Role of Testimony and Domain Knowledge in Children’s Navigation of the Reality/Fantasy Distinction. Symposium conducted at the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial meeting, May, Denver, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar

Woolley, J. D., and van Reet, J. (2006). Effects of Context on Judgements Concerning Reality Status of Novel Entities. Child Development, 77(6), 1778–1793.Google Scholar

Youngblade, L. M., and Dunn, J. (1995). Individual Differences in Young Children’s Pretend Play with Mother and Sibling: Links to Relationships and Understandings of Other People’s Feelings and Beliefs. Child Development, 66, 1472–1492.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.