Book contents
- Shakespeare on Screen: King Lear
- Series page
- Shakespeare on Screen: King Lear
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Notes on Contributors
- Series Editors’ Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Introduction: Dis-locating King Lear on Screen
- Part I Surviving Lear: Revisiting the Canon
- Part II Lear en Abyme: Metatheatre and the Screen
- Part III The Genres of Lear
- Part IV Lear on the Loose: Migrations and Appropriations of Lear
- Chapter 10 Relocating Jewish Culture in The Yiddish King Lear (1934)
- Chapter 11 The Trump Effect: Exceptionalism, Global Capitalism and the War on Women in Early Twenty-first-century Films of King Lear
- Chapter 12 Looking for Lear in The Eye of the Storm
- Chapter 13 Between Political Drama and Soap Opera: Appropriations of King Lear in US Television Series Boss and Empire
- Chapter 14 Afterword: Godard’s King Lear
- Chapter 15 King Lear on Screen: Select Film-bibliography
- Index
- References
Chapter 12 - Looking for Lear in The Eye of the Storm
from Part IV - Lear on the Loose: Migrations and Appropriations of Lear
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 September 2019
Book contents
- Shakespeare on Screen: King Lear
- Series page
- Shakespeare on Screen: King Lear
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Notes on Contributors
- Series Editors’ Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Introduction: Dis-locating King Lear on Screen
- Part I Surviving Lear: Revisiting the Canon
- Part II Lear en Abyme: Metatheatre and the Screen
- Part III The Genres of Lear
- Part IV Lear on the Loose: Migrations and Appropriations of Lear
- Chapter 10 Relocating Jewish Culture in The Yiddish King Lear (1934)
- Chapter 11 The Trump Effect: Exceptionalism, Global Capitalism and the War on Women in Early Twenty-first-century Films of King Lear
- Chapter 12 Looking for Lear in The Eye of the Storm
- Chapter 13 Between Political Drama and Soap Opera: Appropriations of King Lear in US Television Series Boss and Empire
- Chapter 14 Afterword: Godard’s King Lear
- Chapter 15 King Lear on Screen: Select Film-bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
The Australian film The Eye of the Storm (2011), directed by Fred Schepisi, enters into complex intertextual dialogues with both the novel that it adapts, Patrick White’s The Eye of the Storm (1973), and Shakespeare’s King Lear. This chapter explores the ‘Learness’ of Schepisi’s film, and the oscillating effect of both parallels and key departures. With a female Lear as the central protagonist, the film is part of an intriguing history of adaptations or appropriations that have explored gender in Lear. The Eye of the Storm also raises questions of postcoloniality and national identity. Furthermore, the film explores ideas of the harsh Australian landscape, the narrative culminating in a tropical storm that relocates the heath of Lear to northern Queensland. The film invites a range of questions on what appropriating Lear can mean in contemporary film, and how it can articulate suffering, complex relationships and the human condition. In this process, the medium of film itself plays a key role and the chapter considers the ways in which the medium itself, and filmic choices such as screen composition, camera angles, point of view and mise-en-scène, facilitate our engagement with the key characters, the concept of ‘Learness’ and the theme of human suffering.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare on Screen: King Lear , pp. 185 - 201Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Works Cited
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G. and Tiffin, H., The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures, 2nd edition (London and New York: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar
Beatson, P. R., ‘The Skiapod and the Eye: Patrick White’s The Eye of the Storm’, Southerly 34.3 (1974): 219–32.Google Scholar
Bladen, V., ‘Antipodean Shakespeares: Quoting Shakespeare in Australian Film’, in Joubin, A. A. (ed.), Cinematic Allusions to Shakespeare: International Appropriations (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Bulman, J. C. (ed.), Shakespeare Re-Dressed: Cross-Gender Casting in Contemporary Performance (Madison and Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Calbi, M., Spectral Shakespeares: Media Adaptations in the Twenty-First Century (New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar
Cartelli, T. and Rowe, K., New Wave Shakespeare on Screen (Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Desmet, C., Loper, N. and Casey, J. (eds.), Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaherty, K., Ours as We Play It: Australia Plays Shakespeare (Crawley, W.A.: UWA Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar
Golder, J. and Madelaine, R. (eds.), O Brave New World: Two Centuries of Shakespeare on the Australian Stage (Sydney: Currency Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Griggs, Y., Shakespeare’s ‘King Lear’: the Relationship between Text and Film (London: Methuen Drama, 2009).Google Scholar
Hatchuel, S., Shakespeare, from Stage to Screen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helff, S., ‘Patrick White-Lite: Fred Schepisi’s Filmic Adaptation of The Eye of the Storm’, in Vanden Driesen, C. and Ashcroft, B. (eds.), Patrick White Centenary: the Legacy of a Prodigal Son (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars, 2014), 181–95.Google Scholar
Hoover, C., ‘Women, Centaurs, and Devils in King Lear’, Women’s Studies 16 (1989): 349–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheon, L. with O’Flynn, S., A Theory of Adaptation, 2nd edition (London and New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Kelly, P., ‘Performing Australian Identity: Gendering King Lear’, Theatre Journal 57.2 (2005): 205–27.Google Scholar
Klett, E., Cross-Gender Shakespeare and English National Identity: Wearing the Codpiece (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanier, D. M., Shakespeare and Modern Popular Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanier, D. M. ‘Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare: Afterword’, in Desmet, C., Loper, N. and Casey, J. (eds.), Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), 293–306.Google Scholar
Lanier, D. M. ‘Shakespearean Rhizomatics: Adaptation, Ethics, Value’, in Huang, A. and Rivlin, E. (eds.), Shakespeare and the Ethics of Appropriation (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), 21–40.Google Scholar
Maack, A., ‘Shakespearean Reference as Structural Principle in Patrick White’s The Tree of Man and The Eye of the Storm’, Southerly 38.2 (1978): 123–40.Google Scholar
McFarlane, B., ‘The Filmmaker as Adaptor: Fred Schepisi Takes on Patrick White in The Eye of the Storm’, Senses of Cinema 60 (2011): http://sensesofcinema.com/2011/60/the-filmmaker-as-adaptor-fred-schepisi-takes-on-patrick-white-in-the-eye-of-the-storm/ (accessed 23 November 2017).Google Scholar
Miller, G., ‘Cross-Gender Casting as Feminist Interventions in the Staging of Early Modern Plays’, Journal of International Women’s Studies 16.1 (2014): 4–17.Google Scholar
Rothwell, K. S., A History of Shakespeare on Screen: a Century of Film and Television, 2nd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Sharrock, G., ‘Patrick White and Iris Murdoch – Death as a Moral Summons in The Eye of the Storm and Bruno’s Dream’, Antipodes 11.1 (1997): 41–4.Google Scholar
Stenning Edgecombe, R., ‘Hugo, Goethe, and Patrick White: Sources for The Eye of the Storm and The Vivisector’, Antipodes 28.2 (2014): 513–17.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 1
- Cited by