Book contents
- Mood Disorders
- Mood Disorders
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 General
- Section 2 Anatomical Studies
- Section 3 Functional and Neurochemical Brain Studies
- Section 4 Novel Approaches in Brain Imaging
- Chapter 11 Imaging Genetic and Epigenetic Markers in Mood Disorders
- Chapter 12 fMRI Neurofeedback as Treatment for Depression
- Chapter 13 Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Studies in Mood Disorders
- Chapter 14 Electrophysiological Biomarkers for Mood Disorders
- Chapter 15 Magnetoencephalography Studies in Mood Disorders
- Chapter 16 An Overview of Machine Learning Applications in Mood Disorders
- Section 5 Therapeutic Applications of Neuroimaging in Mood Disorders
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Chapter 15 - Magnetoencephalography Studies in Mood Disorders
from Section 4 - Novel Approaches in Brain Imaging
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2021
Book contents
- Mood Disorders
- Mood Disorders
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 General
- Section 2 Anatomical Studies
- Section 3 Functional and Neurochemical Brain Studies
- Section 4 Novel Approaches in Brain Imaging
- Chapter 11 Imaging Genetic and Epigenetic Markers in Mood Disorders
- Chapter 12 fMRI Neurofeedback as Treatment for Depression
- Chapter 13 Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Studies in Mood Disorders
- Chapter 14 Electrophysiological Biomarkers for Mood Disorders
- Chapter 15 Magnetoencephalography Studies in Mood Disorders
- Chapter 16 An Overview of Machine Learning Applications in Mood Disorders
- Section 5 Therapeutic Applications of Neuroimaging in Mood Disorders
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) has emerged as an important tool in the study of mood disorders. Although electroencephalography (EEG) is much more widely utilized, largely due to its low cost and ease of use, MEG has the distinct advantage of enabling accurate localization of brain structures. Although a full discussion of the methodology of MEG is beyond the scope of this brief chapter, we will present a brief overview of the technique and refer the reader to several excellent volumes (1–3) for more information.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Mood DisordersBrain Imaging and Therapeutic Implications, pp. 192 - 205Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Hansen, PC, Kringelbach, ML, Salmelin, R, editors. MEG: An Introduction to Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hari, R, Puce, A, editors. MEG-EEG Primer. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supek, S, Aine, CJ, editors. Magnetoencephalography: From Signals to Dynamic Cortical Networks. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2014.Google Scholar
Boto, E, Holmes, N, Leggett, J, et al. Moving magnetoencephalography towards real-world applications with a wearable system. Nature. 2018; 555(7698): 657–661.Google Scholar
Salustri, C, Tecchio, F, Zappasodi, F, et al. Cortical excitability and rest activity properties in patients with depression. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience. 2007; 32(4): 259–266.Google Scholar
Kurita, S, Takei, Y, Maki, Y, et al. Magnetoencephalography study of the effect of attention modulation on somatosensory processing in patients with major depressive disorder. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2016; 70(2): 116–125.Google Scholar
Cornwell, BR, Salvadore, G, Furey, M, et al. Synaptic potentiation is critical for rapid antidepressant response to ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression. Biological Psychiatry. 2012; 72(7): 555–561.Google Scholar
Nugent, AC, Wills, KE, Gilbert, JR, Zarate, Jr CA. Synaptic Potentiation and Rapid Antidepressant Response to Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A Replication Study. In Revision.Google Scholar
Gilbert, JR, Yarrington, JS, Wills, KE, Nugent, AC, Zarate, CA, Jr. Glutamatergic signaling drives ketamine-mediated response in depression: Evidence from dynamic causal modeling. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018; 21(8): 740–747.Google Scholar
Wang, Y, Jia, Y, Feng, Y, et al. Overlapping auditory M100 and M200 abnormalities in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A MEG study. Schizophrenia Research. 2014; 160(1–3): 201–207.Google Scholar
Kähkönen, S, Yamashita, H, Rytsälä, H, et al. Dysfunction in early auditory processing in major depressive disorder revealed by combined MEG and EEG. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience. 2007; 32(5): 316–222.Google Scholar
Takei, Y, Kumano, S, Hattori, S, et al. Preattentive dysfunction in major depression: A magnetoencephalography study using auditory mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology. 2009; 46(1): 52–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takei, Y, Kumano, S, Maki, Y, et al. Preattentive dysfunction in bipolar disorder: A MEG study using auditory mismatch negativity. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 2010; 34(6): 903–912.Google Scholar
Wang, Y, Feng, Y, Jia, Y, et al. Absence of auditory M100 source asymmetry in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A MEG study. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(12).Google Scholar
Hegerl, U, Juckel, G. Intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials as an indicator of central serotonergic neurotransmission: A new hypothesis. Biol Psychiatry. 1993; 33(3): 173–187.Google Scholar
Hirakawa, N, Hirano, Y, Nakamura, I, et al. Right hemisphere pitch-mismatch negativity reduction in patients with major depression: An MEG study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2017; 215: 225–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimano, S, Onitsuka, T, Oribe, N, et al. Preattentive dysfunction in patients with bipolar disorder as revealed by the pitch-mismatch negativity: A magnetoencephalography (MEG) study. Bipolar Disorders. 2014; 16(6): 592–599.Google Scholar
Isomura, S, Onitsuka, T, Tsuchimoto, R, et al. Differentiation between major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder by auditory steady-state responses. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2016; 190: 800–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oda, Y, Onitsuka, T, Tsuchimoto, R, et al. Gamma band neural synchronization deficits for auditory steady state responses in bipolar disorder patients. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(7).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirano, Y, Oribe, N, Kanba, S, et al. Spontaneous gamma activity in schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015; 72(8): 813–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nugent, AC, Ballard, ED, Gould, TD, et al. Ketamine has distinct electrophysiological and behavioral effects in depressed and healthy subjects. Mol Psychiatry. 2018; 24(7): 1040–1052.Google Scholar
Noda, Y, Zomorrodi, R, Saeki, T, et al. Resting-state EEG gamma power and theta-gamma coupling enhancement following high-frequency left dorsolateral prefrontal rTMS in patients with depression. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017; 128(3): 424–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kam, JW, Bolbecker, AR, O’Donnell, BF, Hetrick, WP, Brenner, CA. Resting state EEG power and coherence abnormalities in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res. 2013; 47(12): 1893–1901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reite, M, Teale, P, Rojas, DC, et al. MEG auditory evoked fields suggest altered structural/functional asymmetry in primary but not secondary auditory cortex in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders. 2009; 11(4): 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y, Feng, Y, Jia, Y, et al. Auditory M50 and M100 sensory gating deficits in bipolar disorder: A MEG study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2014; 152–154(1): 131–138.Google Scholar
Oribe, N, Onitsuka, T, Hirano, S, et al. Differentiation between bipolar disorder and schizophrenia revealed by neural oscillation to speech sounds: An MEG study. Bipolar Disorders. 2010; 12(8): 804–812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domschke, K, Zwanzger, P, Rehbein, MA, et al. Magnetoencephalographic correlates of emotional processing in major depression before and after pharmacological treatment. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016; 19(2): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Q, Ruohonen, EM, Ye, C, et al. Automatic processing of changes in facial emotions in dysphoria: A magnetoencephalography study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2018; 12.Google Scholar
Moratti, S, Rubio, G, Campo, P, Keil, A, Ortiz, T. Hypofunction of right temporoparietal cortex during emotional arousal in depression. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2008; 65(5): 532–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moratti, S, Strange, B, Rubio, G. Emotional arousal modulation of right temporoparietal cortex in depression depends on parental depression status in women: First evidence. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2015; 178: 79–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Disner, SG, Beevers, CG, Haigh, EA, Beck, AT. Neural mechanisms of the cognitive model of depression. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011; 12(8): 467–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salvadore, G, Cornwell, BR, Colon-Rosario, V, et al. Increased anterior cingulate cortical activity in response to fearful faces: A neurophysiological biomarker that predicts rapid antidepressant response to ketamine. Biological Psychiatry. 2009; 65(4): 289–295.Google Scholar
Lu, Q, Bi, K, Liu, C, et al. Predicting depression based on dynamic regional connectivity: A windowed Granger causality analysis of MEG recordings. Brain Research. 2013; 1535: 52–60.Google Scholar
Lu, Q, Li, H, Luo, G, et al. Impaired prefrontal-amygdala effective connectivity is responsible for the dysfunction of emotion process in major depressive disorder: A dynamic causal modeling study on MEG. Neuroscience Letters. 2012; 523(2): 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Q, Wang, Y, Luo, G, Li, H, Yao, Z. Dynamic connectivity laterality of the amygdala under negative stimulus in depression: A MEG study. Neuroscience Letters. 2013; 547: 42–47.Google Scholar
Bi, K, Hua, L, Wei, M, et al. Dynamic functional-structural coupling within acute functional state change phases: Evidence from a depression recognition study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2016; 191: 145–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, Q, Jiang, H, Luo, G, Han, Y, Yao, Z. Multichannel matching pursuit of MEG signals for discriminative oscillation pattern detection in depression. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2013; 88(2): 206–212.Google Scholar
Lee, PS, Chen, YS, Hsieh, JC, Su, TP, Chen, LF. Distinct neuronal oscillatory responses between patients with bipolar and unipolar disorders: A magnetoencephalographic study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2010; 123(1–3): 270–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, TY, Hsieh, JC, Chen, YS, et al. Different patterns of abnormal gamma oscillatory activity in unipolar and bipolar disorder patients during an implicit emotion task. Neuropsychologia. 2012; 50(7): 1514–1520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKinnon, MC, Yucel, K, Nazarov, A, MacQueen, GM. A meta-analysis examining clinical predictors of hippocampal volume in patients with major depressive disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2009; 34(1): 41–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Cornwell, BR, Salvadore, G, Colon-Rosario, V, et al. Abnormal hippocampal functioning and impaired spatial navigation in depressed individuals: Evidence from whole-head magnetoencephalography. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2010; 167(7): 836–844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salvadore, G, Cornwell, BR, Sambataro, F, et al. Anterior cingulate desynchronization and functional connectivity with the amygdala during a working memory task predict rapid antidepressant response to ketamine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010; 35(7): 1415–1422.Google Scholar
Ionescu, DF, Nugent, AC, Luckenbaugh, DA, et al. Baseline working memory activation deficits in dimensional anxious depression as detected by magnetoencephalography. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 2015; 27(3): 143–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernández, A, Rodriguez-Palancas, A, López-Ibor, M, et al. Increased occipital delta dipole density in major depressive disorder determined by magnetoencephalography. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience. 2005; 30(1): 17–23.Google Scholar
Maihöfner, C, Ropohl, A, Reulbach, U, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: A magnetoencephalographic study. NeuroReport. 2005; 16(16): 1839–1842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Timemy, AH, Fernandez, A, Escudero, J, editors. Spectral Analysis of Resting State Magnetoencephalogram Activity in Patients with Bipolar Disorder. 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, H, Popov, T, Jylänki, P, et al. Predictability of depression severity based on posterior alpha oscillations. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2016; 127(4): 2108–2114.Google Scholar
Linkenkaer-Hansen, K, Monto, S, Rytsälä, H, et al. Breakdown of long-range temporal correlations in theta oscillations in patients with major depressive disorder. Journal of Neuroscience. 2005; 25(44): 10131–10137.Google Scholar
Buzsaki, G, Wang, XJ. Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012; 35: 203–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandal, MJ, Sisti, J, Klook, K, et al. GABAB-mediated rescue of altered excitatory-inhibitory balance, gamma synchrony and behavioral deficits following constitutive NMDAR-hypofunction. Transl Psychiatry. 2012; 2: e142.Google Scholar
Duman, RS, Aghajanian, GK. Synaptic dysfunction in depression: Potential therapeutic targets. Science. 2012; 338(6103): 68–72.Google Scholar
Bachmann, M, Paeske, L, Kalev, K, et al. Methods for classifying depression in single channel EEG using linear and nonlinear signal analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018; 155: 11–17.Google Scholar
Strelets, VB, Garakh Zh, V, Novototskii-Vlasov, VY. Comparative study of the gamma rhythm in normal conditions, during examination stress, and in patients with first depressive episode. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2007; 37(4): 387–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, AD, Saxena, N, Jackson, LE, et al. Ketamine amplifies induced gamma frequency oscillations in the human cerebral cortex. European Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015; 25(8): 1136–1146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanos, P, Moaddel, R, Morris, PJ, et al. NMDAR inhibition-independent antidepressant actions of ketamine metabolites. Nature. 2016; 533(7604): 481–486.Google Scholar
Stam, CJ. Nonlinear dynamical analysis of EEG and MEG: review of an emerging field. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005; 116(10): 2266–2301.Google Scholar
Méndez, MA, Zuluaga, P, Hornero, R, et al. Complexity analysis of spontaneous brain activity: Effects of depression and antidepressant treatment. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 2012; 26(5): 636–643.Google Scholar
Fernández, A, Al-Timemy, AH, Ferre, F, Rubio, G, Escudero, J. Complexity analysis of spontaneous brain activity in mood disorders: A magnetoencephalography study of bipolar disorder and major depression. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 2018; 84: 112–117.Google Scholar
Brookes, MJ, Woolrich, MW, Barnes, GR. Measuring functional connectivity in MEG: A multivariate approach insensitive to linear source leakage. Neuroimage. 2012; 63(2): 910–920.Google Scholar
Brookes, MJ, Tewarie, PK, Hunt, BAE, et al. A multi-layer network approach to MEG connectivity analysis. Neuroimage. 2016; 132: 425–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colclough, GL, Brookes, MJ, Smith, SM, Woolrich, MW. A symmetric multivariate leakage correction for MEG connectomes. Neuroimage. 2015; 117: 439–448.Google Scholar
Chen, SS, Tu, PC, Su, TP, et al. Impaired frontal synchronization of spontaneous magnetoencephalographic activity in patients with bipolar disorder. Neuroscience Letters. 2008; 445(2): 174–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nugent, AC, Robinson, SE, Coppola, R, Furey, ML, Zarate, CA, Jr. Group differences in MEG-ICA derived resting state networks: Application to major depressive disorder. NeuroImage. 2015; 118: 1–12.Google Scholar
Muthukumaraswamy, SD, Shaw, AD, Jackson, LE, et al. Evidence that subanesthetic doses of ketamine cause sustained disruptions of NMDA and AMPA-mediated frontoparietal connectivity in humans. Journal of Neuroscience. 2015; 35(33): 11694–11706.Google Scholar
Zhang, S, Tian, S, Chattun, MR, et al. A supplementary functional connectivity microstate attached to the default mode network in depression revealed by resting-state magnetoencephalography. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 2018; 83: 76–85.Google Scholar
Wise, T, Marwood, L, Perkins, AM, et al. Instability of default mode network connectivity in major depression: A two-sample confirmation study. Transl Psychiatry. 2017; 7(4): e1105.Google Scholar
Hamilton, JP, Farmer, M, Fogelman, P, Gotlib, IH. Depressive rumination, the default-mode network, and the dark matter of clinical neuroscience. Biol Psychiatry. 2015; 78(4): 224–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, X, Zhu, Q, Shen, H, Liao, W, Yuan, F. Rumination and default mode network subsystems connectivity in first-episode, drug-naive young patients with major depressive disorder. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 43105.Google Scholar
Perera, T, George, MS, Grammer, G, et al. The clinical TMS society consensus review and treatment recommendations for TMS therapy for major depressive disorder. Brain Stimul. 2016; 9(3): 336–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pathak, Y, Salami, O, Baillet, S, Li, Z, Butson, CR. Longitudinal changes in depressive circuitry in response to neuromodulation therapy. Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 2016; 10(July 2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, CT, Chen, LF, Tu, PC, et al. Impaired prefronto-thalamic functional connectivity as a key feature of treatment-resistant depression: A combined MEG, PET and rTMS study. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(8).Google ScholarPubMed
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.