Adams, J., and He, X. 2017. Lifting of elements of Weyl groups. J. Algebra, 485, 142–165.Google Scholar

Alvis, D. 1980. Duality in the character ring of a finite Chevalley group. In The Santa Cruz Conference on Finite Groups. Proc. Symp. in Pure Math., vol. 37, 353–357, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA.Google Scholar

Alvis, D., Lusztig, G., and Spaltenstein, N. 1982. On Springer's correspondence for simple groups of type E_n(n = 6,7,8). Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 92, 65–78.Google Scholar

Benson, C. T., and Curtis, C. W. 1972. On the degrees and rationality of certain characters of finite Chevalley groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 165, 251–273.Google Scholar

Beynon, W. M., and Spaltenstein, N. 1984. Green functions of finite Chevalley groups of type E_n(n = 6,7,8). J. Algebra, 88, 584–614.Google Scholar

Bonnafé, C. 2005a. Actions of relative Weyl groups II. J. Group Theory, 8, 351–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonnafé, C. 2005b. Quasi-isolated elements in reductive groups. Comm. Algebra, 33, 2315–2337.Google Scholar

Bonnafé, C. 2006. Sur les caractères des groupes réductifs finis à centre non connexe: applications aux groupes spéciaux linéaires et unitaires. Astérisque, 306, 1–174.Google Scholar

Bonnafé, C. 2010. Representations of SL₂(F_q). London, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Bonnafé, C., and Michel, J. 2011. A computational proof of the Mackey formula for q > 2. J. Algebra, 327, 506–526.Google Scholar

Bonnafé, C., and Rouquier, R. 2006. On the irreducibility of Deligne–Lusztig varieties. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 343, 37–39.Google Scholar

Borel, A. 1991. Linear Algebraic Groups. Second enlarged ed. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, no. 126. New York, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Borel, A., and Tits, J. 1965. Groupes réductifs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 27, 55–160.Google Scholar

Borel, A., Carter, R., Curtis, C. W., Iwahori, N., Springer, T. A., and Steinberg, R. 1970. Seminar on Algebraic Groups and Related Topics. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 131. New York, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Borho, W., and MacPherson, R. 1981. Représentations des groupes de Weyl et homologie d'intersection pour les variétés nilpotentes. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 292, 707–710.Google Scholar

Bourbaki, N. 1968. Groupes et algèebres de Lie, chapters IV, V, VI. Hermann, Paris.Google Scholar

Bourbaki, N. 1971. Algèebre, chapters 1–3. Hermann/Addison-Wesley, Paris.Google Scholar

Bourbaki, N. 1975. Algèebre commutative, chapters 5–7. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Bourbaki, N. 1981. Algèebre, chapter 8. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Broué, M. 2017. On Characters of Finite Groups. Mathematical Lectures from Peking University. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Broué, M., Malle, G., and Michel, J. 1999. Towards Spetses I. Transformation Groups, 4, 157–218.Google Scholar

Carter, R. W. 1985. Finite Groups of Lie Type: Conjugacy Classes and Complex Characters. Chichester, Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar

Chevalley, C. 1955. Invariants of finite reflection groups. Amer. J. Math., 77, 778–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chevalley, C. 1994. Sur les décompositions cellulaires des espaces G/B. In Algebraic Groups and Their Generalizations: Classical Methods (University Park, PA, 1991). Proc. Symp. Pure Math., vol. 56, 1–23. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Chevalley, C. 2005. Classification des groupes algébriques semi-simples. Collected works, vol. 3. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Curtis, C. W. 1980. Truncation and duality in the character ring of a finite group of Lie type. J. Algebra, 62, 320–332.Google Scholar

Curtis, C. W., and Reiner, I. 1981. Methods of Representation Theory I. Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar

Deligne, P. 1977. Cohomologie étale. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 569. Springer Verlag. Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique du Bois-Marie SGA 4 1/2, Avec la collaboration de J. F. Boutot, A. Grothendieck, L. Illusie et J. L. Verdier.Google Scholar

Deligne, P. 1980. La conjecture de Weil II. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 43, 137–252.Google Scholar

Deligne, P., and Lusztig, G. 1976. Representations of reductive groups over finite fields. Ann. of Math., 103, 103–161.Google Scholar

Deligne, P., and Lusztig, G. 1982. Duality for representations of a reductive group over a finite field. J. Algebra, 74, 284–291.Google Scholar

Deligne, P., and Lusztig, G. 1983. Duality for representations of a reductive group over a finite field II. J. Algebra, 81, 540–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deodhar, V. 1989. A note on subgroups generated by reflections in Coxeter groups. Arch. Math., 53, 543–546.Google Scholar

Deriziotis, D. I. 1984. Conjugacy classes and centralizers of semi-simple elements in finite groups of Lie type. Vorlesungen aus dem Fachbereich Mathematik der Universität Essen, 11.Google Scholar

Digne, F., and Michel, J. 1982. Remarques sur la dualité de Curtis. J. Algebra, 79, 151–160.Google Scholar

Digne, F., and Michel, J. 1983. Foncteur de Lusztig et fonctions de Green généralisées. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 297, 89–92.Google Scholar

Digne, F., and Michel, J. 1987. Foncteurs de Lusztig et caractèeres des groupes linéaires et unitaires sur un corps fini. J. Algebra, 107, 217–255.Google Scholar

Digne, F., and Michel, J. 1990. On Lusztig's parametrization of characters of finite groups of Lie type. Asterisque, 181–182, 113–156.Google Scholar

Digne, F., and Michel, J. 1994. Groupes réductifs non connexes. Ann. ENS, 27, 345–406.Google Scholar

Digne, F., Lehrer, G. I., and Michel, J. 1992. The characters of the group of rational points of a reductive group with non-connected centre. J. Reine Angew. Math., 425, 155–192.Google Scholar

Digne, F., Lehrer, G. I., and Michel, J. 1997. On Gelfand–Graev characters of reductive groups with disconnected centre. J. Reine Angew. Math., 491, 131–147.Google Scholar

Digne, F., Michel, J., and Rouquier, R. 2007. Cohomologie des variétés de Deligne–Lusztig. Adv. Math., 209, 749–822.Google Scholar

Dipper, R., and Du, J. 1993. Harish-Chandra vertices. J. Reine Angew. Math., 437, 101–130.Google Scholar

Dyer, M. 1990. Reflection subgroups of Coxeter systems. J. Algebra, 135, 57–73.Google Scholar

Geck, M. 1993. A note on Harish-Chandra induction. Manuscripta Math., 80, 393–401.Google Scholar

Geck, M. 1996. On the average value of the irreducible characters of finite groups of Lie type on geometric unipotent classes. Doc. Math. J. DMV, 1, 293–317.Google Scholar

Geck, M. 2003. An Introduction to Algebraic Geometry and Algebraic Groups. Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 10. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Geck, M. 2019. Computing Green Functions in Small Characteristic. Arxiv: 1904.06970 [math.RT].Google Scholar

Geck, M., and Jacon, N. 2011. Representations of Hecke Algebras at Roots of Unity. Algebra and Applications, No. 15. Springer Verlag, London.Google Scholar

Geck, M., and Malle, G. 1999. On the existence of a unipotent support for the irreducible characters of a finite group of Lie type. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 352, 429–456.Google Scholar

Geck, M., and Malle, G. 2003. Fourier transforms and Frobenius eigenvalues for finite Coxeter groups. J. Algebra, 260, 162–193.Google Scholar

Geck, M., and Pfeiffer, G. 2000. Characters of Finite Coxeter Groups and Iwahori–Hecke Algebras. London Mathematical Society Monographs, Vol. 21. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Geck, M., Hiss, G., Lubeck, F., Malle, G., and Pfeiffer, G. 1996a. CHEVIE A system for computing and processing generic character tables for finite groups of Lie type. Appl. Algebra Eng. Comm. Comput., 7, 175–210.Google Scholar

Geck, M., Hiss, G., and Malle, G. 1996b. Towards a classification of the irreducible representations in non-describing characteristic of a finite group of Lie type. Math. Z., 221(3), 353–386.Google Scholar

Gelfand, I. M., and Graev, M. I. 1962. Construction of irreducible representations of simple algebraic groups over a finite field. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR, 147, 529–532.Google Scholar

Gorenstein, D. 1980. Finite Groups. Chelsea Publishing, New York.Google Scholar

Green, J. 1955. The characters of the finite general linear groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 80, 402–447.Google Scholar

Grothendieck, A. 1967. éléments de géométrie algébrique IV. étude locale des schemas et des morphismes de schémas, quatrièeme partie. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 32, 5–361.Google Scholar

Grothendieck, A., et al. 1972–1973. Théorie des topos et cohomologie étale des schéma. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Nos. 269, 270, 305. Springer Verlag, Berlin. Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique du Bois-Marie 1963–1964 (SGA 4), Dirigé par M. Artin, A. Grothendieck et J. L. Verdier. Avec la collaboration de P. Deligne et B. Saint-Donat.Google Scholar

Grothendieck, A., et al. 1977. SGA 5. Cohomologie l-adique et fonctions L. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 589. Springer Verlag, Berlin. Editor L. Illusie.Google Scholar

Harish-Chandra. 1970. Eisenstein series over finite fields. Pages 76–88 of: Functional Analysis and Related Fields. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Hartshorne, R. 1977. Algebraic Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 52. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar

Hiller, H. 1982. Geometry of Coxeter groups. Pitman, Boston.Google Scholar

Howlett, R. B. 1974. On the degrees of Steinberg characters of Chevalley groups. Math. Z., 135, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howlett, R. B., and Lehrer, G. I. 1980. Induced cuspidal representations and generalized Hecke rings. Invent. Math., 58, 37–64.Google Scholar

Howlett, R. B., and Lehrer, G. I. 1994. On Harish-Chandra induction and restriction for modules of Levi subgroups. J. Algebra, 165, 172–183.Google Scholar

Humphreys, J. E. 1975. Linear Algebraic Groups. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 21. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Kawanaka, N. 1982. Fourier transforms of nilpotently supported invariant functions on a simple Lie algebra over a finite field. Invent. Math., 69, 411–435.Google Scholar

Kazhdan, D. 1977. Proof of Springer's hypothesis. Israel J. Math., 28, 272–286.Google Scholar

Lang, S. 2002. Algebra. Revised 3rd ed. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 211. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar

Lehrer, G. I. 1978. On the characters of semisimple groups over finite fields. Osaka J. Math., 15, 77–99.Google Scholar

Liebeck, M., and Seitz, G. 2012. Unipotent and Nilpotent Classes in Simple Algebraic Groups and Lie Algebras. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, Vol. 180. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lou, B. 1968. The centralizer of a regular unipotent element in a semi-simple algebraic group. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 74, 1144–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lusztig, G. 1976a. Coxeter orbits and eigenspaces of Frobenius. Invent. Math., 28, 101–159.Google Scholar

Lusztig, G. 1976b. On the finiteness of the number of unipotent classes. Invent. Math., 34, 201–213.Google Scholar

Lusztig, G. 1977. Representations of finite classical groups. Invent. Math., 43, 125–175.Google Scholar

Lusztig, G. 1978. Representations of Finite Chevalley Groups. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, Vol. 39. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI. Expository lectures from the CBMS Regional Conference held at Madison, WI, August 8–12, 1977.Google Scholar

Lusztig, G. 1984a. Characters of Reductive Groups Over a Finite Field. Annals of Mathematics Studies, No. 107. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Lusztig, G. 1984b. Intersection cohomology complexes on a reductive group. Invent. Math., 75, 205–272.Google Scholar

Lusztig, G. 1986a. Character sheaves IV. Advances in Math., 59, 1–63.Google Scholar

Lusztig, G. 1986b. Character sheaves V. Advances in Math., 61, 103–165.Google Scholar

Lusztig, G. 1986c. On the character values of finite Chevalley groups at unipotent elements. J. Algebra, 104, 146–194.Google Scholar

Lusztig, G. 1988. On the representations of reductive groups with disconnected center. Astérisque, 168, 157–166.Google Scholar

Lusztig, G. 1990. Green functions and character sheaves. Ann. Math., 131, 355–408.Google Scholar

Lusztig, G. 1992. A unipotent support for irreducible representations. Adv. Math., 94, 139–179.Google Scholar

Lusztig, G., and Spaltenstein, N. 1985. On the generalized Springer correspondence for classical groups. Pages 289–316 of: Algebraic Groups and Related Topics (Kyoto/Nagoya, 1983). Adv. Stud. Pure Math., Vol. 6. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Lusztig, G., and Srinivasan, B. 1977. The characters of the finite unitary groups. J. Algebra, 49, 167–171.Google Scholar

Malle, G. 1990. Die unipotenten Charaktere von ²F₄(q²). Comm. Algebra, 18, 2361–2381.Google Scholar

Malle, G. 1999. On the rationality and fake degrees of characters of cyclotomic algebras. J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, 6, 647–677.Google Scholar

Malle, G., and Testerman, D. 2011. Linear Algebraic Groups and Finite Groups of Lie Type. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 133. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Milne, J. S. 1980. étale cohomology. Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 33. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Milne, J. S. 2017. Algebraic Groups. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, No. 170. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mizuno, K. 1980. The conjugate classes of unipotent elements of the Chevalley groups E₇ and E₈. Tokyo J. Math., 3, 391–459.Google Scholar

Serre, J.-P. 1994. Cohomologie Galoisienne, 5th ed. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 5. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Shephard, G. C., and Todd, J. A. 1954. Finite unitary reflection groups. Canad. J. Math., 6, 274–304.Google Scholar

Shoji, T. 1979. On the Springer representations of the Weyl groups of classical algebraic groups. Comm. Algebra, 7, 1713–1745, 2027–2033.Google Scholar

Shoji, T. 1982. On the Green polynomials of a Chevalley group of type F₄. Comm. Algebra, 10, 505–543.Google Scholar

Shoji, T. 1983. On the Green polynomials of classical groups. Invent. Math., 74, 239–267.Google Scholar

Shoji, T. 1987. Green functions of reductive groups over a finite field. Pages 289–301 of: The Arcata Conference on Representations of Finite Groups (Arcata, Calif., 1986). Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 47. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Shoji, T. 1995. Character sheaves and almost characters of reductive groups I, II. Adv. Math., 111, 244–354.Google Scholar

Shoji, T. 2007. Generalized Green functions and unipotent classes for finite reductive groups, II. Nagoya Math. J., 188, 133–170.Google Scholar

Slodowy, P. 1980. Simple Singularities and Simple Algebraic Groups. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 815. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Spaltenstein, N. 1977. On the fixed point set of a unipotent element on the variety of Borel subgroups. Topology, 16, 203–204.Google Scholar

Spaltenstein, N. 1982. Classes unipotentes et sous-groupes de Borel. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 946. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Spaltenstein, N. 1985. On the generalized Springer correspondence for exceptional groups. Pages 317–338 of: Algebraic Groups and Related Topics (Kyoto/Nagoya, 1983). Adv. Stud. Pure Math., vol. 6. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Springer, T. A. 1966a. A note on centralizers in semi-simple groups. Indag. Math., 28, 75–77.Google Scholar

Springer, T. A. 1966b. Some arithmetic results on semi-simple Lie algebras. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 30, 115–141.Google Scholar

Springer, T. A. 1974. Regular elements of finite reflection groups. Invent. Math., 25, 159–198.Google Scholar

Springer, T. A. 1976. Trigonometric sums, Green functions of finite groups and representations of Weyl groups. Invent. Math., 36, 173–207.Google Scholar

Springer, T. A. 1998. Linear Algebraic Groups, 2nd ed. Progress in Mathematics, No. 9. Birkhäuser, Boston.Google Scholar

Srinivasan, B. 1979. Representations of Finite Chevalley Groups. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 764. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Steinberg, R. 1956. Prime power representations of finite linear groups I. Canad. J. Math., 8, 580–591.Google Scholar

Steinberg, R. 1957. Prime power representations of finite linear groups II. Canad. J. Math., 9, 347–351.Google Scholar

Steinberg, R. 1968. Endomorphisms of linear algebraic groups. Mem. Am. Math. Soc., 80.Google Scholar

Steinberg, R. 1974. Conjugacy Classes in Algebraic Groups. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 366. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Steinberg, R. 2016. Lectures on Chevalley Groups. University Lecture Series, No. 66. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI. Revised and corrected edition of the 1968 original.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. 2018. On the Mackey formula for connected centre groups. J. Group Theory, 21, 439–448.Google Scholar

Tits, J. 1964. Algebraic simple groups and abstract groups. Ann. Math., 80, 313–329.Google Scholar

Tits, J. 1966. Normalisateurs de tores. I. Groupes de Coxeter étendus. J. Algebra, 4, 96–116.Google Scholar

Zhelevinski, A. 1981. Representations of Finite Classical Groups. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 869. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar