Alexander, L. 2013. You got what you deserved. Criminal Law and Philosophy 7: 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, L., Kessler Ferzan, K., and Morse, S.. 2009. Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alicke, M. D. 1994. Evidential and extra-evidential evaluations of social conduct. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 9: 591–615.Google Scholar

Alicke, M. D. 2000. Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin 126: 556–574.Google Scholar

Alicke, M. D. 2008. Blaming badly. Journal of Cognition and Culture 8: 179–186.Google Scholar

Alicke, M. D., Buckingham, J., Zell, E., and Davis, T.. 2008. Culpable control and counterfactual reasoning in the psychology of blame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34: 1371–1381.Google Scholar

Alicke, M. D., Rose, D., and Bloom, D.. 2008. Causation, norm violation, and culpable control. Journal of Philosophy 108: 670–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amnesty International. 2012. Death Sentences and Executions 2011. London: Amnesty International Publications.Google Scholar

Ashworth, A. 2015. Sentencing and Criminal Justice, 6th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aspinwall, L. G., Brown, T. R., and Tabery, J.. 2012. The double-edged sword: Does biomechanism increase or decrease judges’ sentencing of psychopaths? Science 337: 846–849.Google Scholar

Austin, J., Eisen, L-B., Cullen, J., and Frank, J.. 2016. How Many Americans Are Unnecessarily Incarcerated? Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. Available at: www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/publications/Unnecessarily_Incarcerated_0.pdf.Google Scholar

Berg, K. S. and Vidmar, N.. 1975. Authoritarianism and recall of evidence about criminal behavior. Journal of Research in Personality 9: 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, M. 2008. Punishment and justification. Ethics 18: 258–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, M. 2011. Two kinds of retributivism. In Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law, eds. Duff, R. A. and Green, S., pp. 433–457. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, M. 2013. Rehabilitating retributivism. Law and Philosophy 32: 83–108.Google Scholar

Berman, M. 2016. Modest retributivism. In Legal, Moral, and Metaphysical Truths: The Philosophy of Michael S. Moore, eds. Kessler Ferzan, K. and Morse, S. J., pp. 35–48. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumstein, A., Tonry, M., and Van Ness, A.. 2005. Cross-national measure of punitiveness. Crime and Justice 33(1): 347–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boonin, D. 2008. The Problem of Punishment. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, J. M. and Paulhus, D. L.. 2013. Worldview implications of believing in free will and/or determinism: Politics, morality, and punitiveness. Journal of Personality 81(2): 130–141.Google Scholar

Carlsmith, K. M. and Darley, J. M.. 2008. Psychological aspects of retributive justice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 40: 193–236.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2012. Free Will and Consciousness: A Determinist Account of the Illusion of Free Will. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. (ed.). 2013. Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Introduction, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2016. Free will skepticism and criminal behavior: A public health–quarantine model. Southwest Philosophical Review 32(1): 25–48.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2017. Public Health and Safety: The Social Determinants of Health and Criminal Behavior. London: ResearchLinks Books.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2018. Skepticism about moral responsibility. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism-moral-responsibility/.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2019. Free will skepticism and its implications: An argument for optimism. In Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society: Challenging Retributive Justice, eds.Shaw, Elizabeth, Pereboom, Derk, and Caruso, Gregg D., pp. 43–72. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2020. Justice without retribution: An epistemic argument against retributive criminal punishment. Neuroethics 13(1): 13–28.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. and Morris, S. G.. 2017. Compatibilism and retributive desert moral responsibility: On what is of central philosophical and practical importance. Erkenntnis 82: 837–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caruso, G. D. and Pereboom, D.. 2020. A non-punitive alternative to retributive punishment. In Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Science of Punishment, eds. Focquaert, F., Waller, B., and Shaw, E., pp. 355–365. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiesa, L. E. 2011. Punishment without free will. Utah Law Review 1403: 1–87.Google Scholar

Clark, C., Baumeister, R., and Ditto, P. H.. 2017. Making punishment palatable: Belief in free will alleviates punitive distress. Consciousness and Cognition 51: 193–211.Google Scholar

Clark, C. J., Luguri, J. B., Ditto, P. H., Knobe, J., Shariff, A. F., and Baumeister, R. F.. 2014. Free to punish: A motivated account of free will. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 106: 501–513.Google Scholar

Clark, C. J., Shniderman, A., Luguri, J. B., Baumeister, R. F., and Ditto, P. H.. (2018). Are morally good actions ever free? Consciousness and Cognition 63: 161–182.Google Scholar

Clark, C. J., Winegard, B. M., and Baumeister, R. F.. 2019. Forget the folk: Moral responsibility preservation motives and other conditions for compatibilism. Frontiers in Psychology, February 7: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00215.Google Scholar

Clark, C. J., Winegard, B. M., and Shariff, A. F.. 2019. Motivated free will beliefs: The theory, new (preregistered) studies, and three meta-analyses. www.researchgate.net/publication/333384764_Motivated_free_will_belief_The_theory_new_preregistered_studies_and_three_meta-analysesGoogle Scholar

Corrado, M. L. 2013. Why do we resist hard incompatibilism? Some thoughts on freedom and determinism. In The Future of Punishment, ed. Nadelhoffer, T., pp. 79–106. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Corrado, M. L. 2017. Punishment and the Burden of Proof. UNC legal studies research paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2997654 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2997654.Google Scholar

Cowen, N. 2010. Comparison of Crime in OECD Countries. London: CIVITAS Institute for the Study of Civil Society.Google Scholar

Cushman, F. A. 2008. Crime and punishment: Differential reliance on causal and intentional information for different classes of moral judgment. Cognition 108: 353–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotton, M. 2000. Back with a vengeance: The resilience of retribution as an articulated purpose of criminal punishment. American Criminal Law Review 37: 1313, 1326–1327, 1357.Google Scholar

Darwall, S. 1992. Internalism and agency. Philosophical Perspectives 6: 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennett, D. C. 1984. Elbow Room. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. 2011. My brain made me do it. Max Weber Lecture Series. Available at: https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/16895/MWP_LS_2011_01.pdf?sequence=1.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. and Caruso, G. D.. 2021. Just Deserts: Debating Free Will. New York: Polity Books.Google Scholar

Dingwall, G. 2008. Deserting desert? Locating the present role of retributivism in the sentencing of adult offenders. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 47(4): 400–410.Google Scholar

Double, R. 2002. The moral harness of libertarianism. Phil 5: 226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duff, R. A. 2001. Punishment, Communication, and Community. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dunlea, J. P. and Heiphetz, L.. 2020. Children’s and adult’s understanding of punishment and the criminal justice system. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 87: 103913. doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103913.Google Scholar

Eftan, M. G. 1974. The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research and Personality 8: 45–54.Google Scholar

Encartele Inc. 2018. Scandinavian jails: Why is their recidivism rate so much better? Available at: www.encartele.net/2018/04/what-can-us-correctional-facilities-learn-from-scandinavian-jails/.Google Scholar

Enns, P. 2006. Incarceration Nation: How the United States Became the Most Punitive Democracy in the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Epley, N. and Dunning, D.. 2000. Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self or social prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79: 861–875.Google Scholar

Everett, J. A. C., Clark, C. J., Luguri, J. B., Earp, B. D., Ditto, P. H., and Shariff, A. F.. 2018. Political Differences in Free Will Beliefs are Driven by Differences in Moralization. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3011597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, G. and Clarke, K.. 2004. What does the world spend on criminal justice? The European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, affiliated with the United Nations. NEUNI Paper No. 20. www.heuni.fi/material/attachments/heuni/papers/6KtlkZMtL/HEUNI_papers_20.pdfGoogle Scholar

Feldman, G., Wong, K. F. E., and Baumeister, R. F.. 2016. Bad is freer than good: Positive-negative asymmetry in attributions of free will. Consciousness and Cognition 42: 26–40.Google Scholar

Fischborn, M. 2018. How should free will skeptics pursue legal change? Neuroethics 11: 47–54.Google Scholar

Focquaert, F. 2019. Free will skepticism and punishment: A preliminary ethical analysis. In Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society: Challenging Retributive Justice, eds. Shaw, E., Pereboom, D., and Caruso, G. D., pp. 207–236. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Focquaert, F., Caruso, G. D., Shaw, E., and Pereboom, D.. 2020. Justice without retribution: Interdisciplinary perspectives, stakeholder views and practical implications. Neuroethics 13(1): 1–3.Google Scholar

Focquaert, F., Glenn, A., and Raine, A.. 2013. Free will, responsibility and punishment of criminals. In The Future of Punishment, ed. Nadelhoffer, T., pp. 247–274. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Focquaert, F., Glenn, A., and Raine, A.. 2018. Free will skepticism, freedom, and criminal behavior. In Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience, eds. Caruso, G. D. and Flanagan, O., pp. 235–250. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Green, T. A. 2014. Freedom and Criminal Responsibility in American Legal Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hardcastle, V. 2018. The neuroscience of criminality and our sense of justice: An analysis of recent appellate decisions in criminal cases. In Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience, eds. Caruso, G. D. and Flanagan, O., pp. 311–332. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. 2008. Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husak, D. 2000. Holistic retributivism. California Law Review 88: 991–1000.Google Scholar

Jeppsson, S. M. I. 2020. Retributivism, justification and credence: The epistemic argument revisited. Neuroethics. doi.org/10.1007/s12152-020-09436-6.Google Scholar

Jones, M. 2003. Overcoming the myth of free will in criminal law: The true impact of the genetic revolution. Duke Law Journal 52: 1032–1053.Google Scholar

Kane, R. 1996. The Significance of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1790. The Metaphysics of Morals. Hastie: Translation by Mary J. Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1991.Google Scholar

Kelly, E. 2018. The Limits of Blame: Rethinking Punishment and Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kershnar, S. 2000. A defense of retributivism. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14(1): 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kershnar, S. 2001. Desert, Retribution, and Torture. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Kristoffersen, R. 2010. Relapse study in the correctional services of the Nordic countries. EuroVista 2(3): 168–176.Google Scholar

LaBouff, J. and Dustin, A.. 2020. Why we need to change our assumptions about incarceration. Bangor Daily. January 21. Available at: https://bangordailynews.com/2020/01/21/opinion/contributors/why-we-need-to-change-our-assumptions-about-incarceration/.Google Scholar

Langado, D. A. and Channon, S.. 2008. Judgments of cause and blame: The effects of intentionality and foreseeability. Cognition 108: 754–770.Google Scholar

Lerner, M. J. and Miller, D. T.. 1978. Just world research and attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin 85: 1030–1051.Google Scholar

Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T., and Holmes, J. G.. 1976. Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, eds. Berkowitz, L. and Walster, E., pp. 133–162.Google Scholar

Levy, N. 2011. Hard Luck: How Luck Undermines Free Will and Moral Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Levy, N. 2012. Skepticism and sanctions: The benefit of rejecting moral responsibility. Law and Philosophy 31(5): 477–493.Google Scholar

Levy, N. 2015. Less blame, less crime? The practical implications of moral responsibility skepticism. Journal of Practical Ethics 3(2): 1–17.Google Scholar

Levy, N. 2016. Does the desire to punish have any place in modern justice? Aeon. February 19, 2016. Accessed online: https://aeon.co/opinions/does-the-desire-to-punish-have-any-place-in-modern-justice.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. S. 1953. The humanitarian theory of punishment. Twentieth Century: An Australian Quarterly Review 3. Reprinted in C.S. Lewis, God in the Dock, edited by Hooper, Walter, pp. 224–230. Grand Rapids: Willian B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar

Mabbott, J. D. 1939. Punishment. Mind 48: 150–167.Google Scholar

Marcus, M. H. 2007. Responding to the model penal code sentencing revisions: Tips for early adopters and power users. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 17: 67–138.Google Scholar

Monterosso, J., Royzman, E. B., and Schwartz, B.. 2005. Explaining away responsibility: Effects of scientific explanation on perceived culpability. Ethics and Behavior 15: 139–158.Google Scholar

Moore, M. S. 1987. The moral worth of retribution. In Punishment and Rehabilitation, ed. Murphy, J. G., 3rd edition, pp. 94–130. New York: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Moore, M. S. 1993. Act and Crime: The Philosophy of Action and Its Implications for Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moore, M. S. 1997. Placing Blame. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morris, S. 2018. The implications of rejecting free will: An empirical analysis. Philosophical Psychology 31(2): 299–321.Google Scholar

Morse, S. J. 2010. Lost in the translation? An essay on law and neuroscience. In Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues, ed. Freeman, M., pp. 530–562. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morse, S. J. 2013. Common criminal law compatibilism. In Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility, ed. Vincent, N. A., pp. 27–52. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morse, S. J. 2018. The neuroscientific non-challenge to meaning, morals, and purpose. In Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience, eds. Caruso, G. D. and Flanagan, O., pp. 333–358. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nadelhoffer, T. 2006. Bad acts, blameworthy agents, and intentional actions: Some problems for juror impartiality. Philosophical Explorations 9(2): 203–219.Google Scholar

Nadelhoffer, T. 2011. The threat of shrinking agency and free will disillusionism. In Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet, eds. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. and Nadel, L., pp. 173–188. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nadelhoffer, T. (ed.). 2013. The Future of Punishment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nadelhoffer, T. and Tocchetto, D. G.. 2013. The potential dark side of believing in free will (and related concepts): Some preliminary findings. In Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility, ed. Caruso, G. D., pp. 121–140. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Neimeth, C. and Sosis, R. H.. 1973. A simulated jury: Characteristics of the defendant and the jurors. Journal of Social Psychology 90: 221–229.Google Scholar

Packer, H. L. 1968. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 1995. Determinism al dente. Nous 29: 21–45.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2001. Living without Free Will. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2013. Free will skepticism and criminal punishment. In The Future of Punishment, ed. Nadelhoffer, T., pp. 47–78. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2014. Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2020. Incapacitation, reintegration, and limited general deterrence. Neuroethics 31(1): 87–97.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. and Caruso, G. D.. 2018. Hard-incompatibilism existentialism: Neuroscience, punishment, and meaning in life. In Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience, eds. Caruso, G. D. and Flanagan, O., pp. 193–222. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pizarro, D., Ulhmann, E., and Salovey, P.. 2003. Asymmetry in judgments of moral blame and praise: The role of perceived metadesires. Psychological Science 14: 267–272. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9280.03433Google Scholar

Powers, M. and Faden, R.. 2006. Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Quinton, A. 1954. On punishment. Analysis 14: 1933–1942.Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. and Gazal-Ayal, O.. 2013. Statutory sentencing reform in Israel: Exploring the sentencing law of 2012. Israel Law Review 46(3): 455–479.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. H. 2008. Distributive Principles of Criminal Law: Who Should Be Punished How Much. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. H. and Cahill, M. T.. 2006. Law Without Justice: Why Criminal Law Doesn’t Give People What They Deserve. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rosen, G. 2004. Skepticism about moral responsibility. Philosophical Perspectives 18: 295–313.Google Scholar

Schlenker, B. R. 1980. Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations. Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar

Sentencing Guidelines Council (England and Wales). 2004. Overarching Principles: Seriousness. London: Sentencing Guidelines Council. Available at: www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Seriousness-guideline.pdf.Google Scholar

The Sentencing Project. 2017. Still Life: America’s Increasing Use of life and Long-Term Sentences. Washington, DC. Report available at: www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Still-Life.pdf.Google Scholar

Shariff, A. F., Greene, J. D., Karremans, J. C., Luguri, J., Clark, C. J., Schooler, J. W., Baumesiter, R. F., and Vohs, K. D.. 2014. Free will and punishment: A mechanistic view of human nature reduces retribution. Psychological Science published online June 10: 1–8.Google Scholar

Shaw, E. 2014. Free Will, Punishment, and Criminal Responsibility. Dissertation Thesis. Edinburgh University. Available at: https://era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/9590/Shaw2014.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar

Shaw, E. 2019a. Justice without more responsibility? Journal of Information Ethics 28(1): 95–114.Google Scholar

Shaw, E. 2019b. The implications of free will skepticism for establishing criminal liability. In Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society: Challenging Retributive Justice, eds. Shaw, E., Pereboom, D., and Caruso, G. D., pp. 192–206. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shaw, E., Pereboom, D., and Caruso, G. D.. 2019. Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society: Challenging Retributive Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sie, M. 2013. Free will, an illusion? An answer from a pragmatic sentimentalist point of view. In Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility, ed. Caruso, G. D., pp. 273–290. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Smilansky, S. 2011. Free will, fundamental dualism, and the centrality of illusion. In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, ed. Kane, R., pp. 425–441. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Snyder, C. R., Higgins, R. L., and Stuckey, R. J.. 1983. Excuses: Masquerades in Search of Grace. Eliot Werner Publications. www.amazon.com/Excuses-Masquerades-Search-Foundations-Psychology/dp/0975273817Google Scholar

Sommers, T. 2007. The objective attitude. The Philosophical Quarterly 57(28): 321–342.Google Scholar

Sosis, R. H. 1974. Internal-external control and the perception of responsibility of another for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30: 393–399.Google Scholar

Strawson, G. 1986. Freedom and Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Strawson, G. 1994. The impossibility of moral responsibility. Philosophical Studies 75(1–2): 5–24.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. 1962. Freedom and resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy 36. Reprinted in Free Will, ed. Watson, G., pp. 59–80. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tadros, V. 2011. The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tasioulas, J. 2006. Punishment and repentance. Philosophy 81: 279–322.Google Scholar

Tonry, M. 2004. US sentencing systems fragmenting. In Panel Reform in Overcrowded Times, ed. Tonry, M., pp. 21–28. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Vargas, M. 2013a. Building Better Beings: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vargas, M. 2013b. If free will doesn’t exist, neither does water. In Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility, ed. Caruso, G. D., pp. 177–202. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Vilhauer, B. 2009a. Free will and reasonable doubt. American Philosophical Quarterly 46(2): 131–140.Google Scholar

Vilhaeur, B. 2009b. Free will skepticism and personhood as a desert base. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39(3): 489–511.Google Scholar

Vilhaeur, B. 2012. Taking free will skepticism seriously. The Philosophical Quarterly 62(249): 833–852.Google Scholar

Vilhaeur, B. 2013a. The people problem. In Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility, ed. Caruso, G. D., pp. 141–160. Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Vilhauer, B. 2013b. Persons, punishment, and free will skepticism. Philosophical Studies 162(2): 143–163.Google Scholar

Vilhauer, B. 2015. Free will and the asymmetrical justification of holding morally responsible. The Philosophical Quarterly 65(261): 772–789.Google Scholar

Von Hirsch, A. 1976. Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishment. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar

Von Hirsch, A. 1981. Desert and previous convictions in sentencing. Minnesota Law Review 56(841): 591–634.Google Scholar

Von Hirsch, A. 2007. The “desert” model for sentencing: Its influence, prospects, and alternatives. Social Research 74(2): 413–434.Google Scholar

Von Hirsch, A. 2017. Deserved Criminal Sentences: An Overview. Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Walen, A. 2014. Retributive justice. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-retributive/.Google Scholar

Waller, B. 1989. Denying responsibility: The difference it makes. Analysis 49(1): 44–47.Google Scholar

Waller, B. 1990. Freedom Without Responsibility. New York: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Waller, B. 2006. Denying responsibility without making excuses. American Philosophical Quarterly 43(1): 81–90.Google Scholar

Waller, B. 2007. Sincere apology without moral responsibility. Social Theory and Practice 33(3): 441–465.Google Scholar

Waller, B. 2011. Against Moral Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Waller, B. 2015. The Stubborn System of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1961. Notebooks 1914–1916. Edited and translated by von Wright, G. H. and Anscombe, G. E. M.. New York: Harper/Blackwell.Google Scholar

Zaibert, L. 2018. Rethinking Punishment. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, M. J. 2011. The Immorality of Punishment. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Allen, R. F. 1995. Free will and indeterminism: Robert Kane’s libertarianism. Journal of Philosophical Research 30: 341–355.Google Scholar

Almeida, M. and Berstein, M.. 2003. Lucky libertarianism. Philosophical Studies 113(2): 93–119.Google Scholar

Arguilar, J. H. and Buckareff, A. A.. (ed.). 2010. Causing Human Actions: New Perspectives on the Causal Theory of Action. MA: Bradford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audi, R. 1974. Moral responsibility, freedom and compulsion. American Philosophical Quarterly 19: 25–39.Google Scholar

Audi, R. 1991. Responsible action and virtuous character. Ethics 101: 304–321.Google Scholar

Audi, R. 1993. Action, Intention and Reason. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. 1961.Ifs and cans. Philosophical Papers, pp. 205–232. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. 1966. Three ways of spilling ink. Philosophical Review 75(4): 427–440.Google Scholar

Avants, B., et al. 2012. Early childhood environment predicts frontal and temporal cortical thickness in the young adult brain. Presented at The Society for Neuroscience 2012 Meeting. http://archive.ismrm.org/2012/3159.htmlGoogle Scholar

Ayer, A. J. 1954. Freedom and necessity. In his Philosophical Essays, pp. 3–20. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Balaguer, M. 2009. Free Will as an Open Scientific Problem. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Berofsky, B. 1966. Free Will and Determinism. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Berofsky, B. 1971. Determinism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Berofsky, B. 1987. Freedom from Necessity: The Metaphysical Basis of Responsibility. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Berofsky, B. 2002. If, cans, and free will: The issues. In Oxford Handbook of Free Will, ed. Kane, R., pp. 181–201. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bishop, J. 1989. Natural Agency. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bohm, D. 1952. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables, I and II. Physics Review 85(2): 166–193.Google Scholar

Bohm, D. 1980. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bok, H. 1998. Freedom and Responsibility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Broad, C. D. 1952. Determinism, indeterminism and libertarianism. In Ethics and the History of Philosophy, ed. Broad, C. D., pp. 195–217. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Buckareff, A. A. Can Agent-Causation Be Rendered Intelligible? An Essay on the Etiology of Free Action. Dissertation: Texas A&M University.Google Scholar

Buckareff, A. A. 2001. Can the agency theory be salvaged? Philosophia Christi 3(1): 217–224.Google Scholar

Buckareff, A. A. 2011. How does agent-causal power work? Modern Schoolman 88(1–2): 105–121.Google Scholar

Buckareff, A. A. 2012. An action theoretic problem for intralevel mental causation. Philosophical Studies 22(1): 89–105.Google Scholar

Buckareff, A. A. 2017. A critique of substance causation. Philosophia 45(3): 1019–1026.Google Scholar

Bunge, M. 1980. The Mind-Body Problem: A Psychobiological Approach. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, C. A. 1951. Is “free will” a pseudo-problem? Mind 60: 446–465.Google Scholar

Campbell, C. A. 1957. On Selfhood and Godhood. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Campbell, C. A. 1967. In Defense of Free Will. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Capes, J. A. 2013. Mitigating soft compatibilism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87(3): 640–663.Google Scholar

Capes, J. A. 2021. Manipulation and direct arguments. In A Companion to Free Will, ed. Campbell, J.. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2012. Consciousness and Free Will: A Determinist Account of the Illusion of Free Will. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2015a. Kane is not able: A reply to Vicens’ “Self-forming actions and conflicts of intention.” Southwestern Philosophical Review 31(2): 21–26.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2015b. Free will eliminativism: Reference, error, and phenomenology. Philosophical Studies 172(10): 2823–2833.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2015b. If consciousness is necessary condition for moral responsibility, then people are less responsible than we think. Journal of Consciousness Studies 22(7-8): 49–60.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2018. Consciousness, free will, and moral responsibility. In Routledge Handbook of Consciousness, ed. Gennaro, R. J., pp. 79–91. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2019a. A defense of the luck pincer: Why luck (still) undermines moral responsibility. Journal of Information Ethics 28(1): 51–72.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2019b. Free will skepticism and its implications: An argument for optimism. In Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society: Challenging Retributive Justice, eds. Shaw, E., Pereboom, D., and Caruso, G. D., pp. 43–72. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2020. Why free will is not real: A reply to Christian List. The Philosopher 108(1): 67–71.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. and Pereboom, D.. 2021. Moral Responsibility Skepticism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chisholm, R. M. 1964. Human freedom and the self. The Lindley Lecture, Department of Philosophy, University of Kansas; reprinted in Free Will, ed. Watson, G., pp. 24–35. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chisholm, R. M. 1966. Freedom and action. In Freedom and Determinism, ed. Lehrer, K., pp. 11–44. New York. Random House.Google Scholar

Chisholm, R. M. 1971. Reflections of human agency. Idealistic Studies 1: 33–46.Google Scholar

Chisholm, R. M. 1976. Person and Object: A Metaphysic Study. La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar

Clarke, R. 1993. Toward a credible agent-causal account of free will. Nous 27: 191–203.Google Scholar

Clarke, R. 1996. Agent causation and event causation in the production of free action. Philosophical Topics 24(2): 19–48.Google Scholar

Clarke, R. 1999. Free choice, effort, and wanting more. Philosophical Explorations 2: 20–41.Google Scholar

Clarke, R. 2000. Modest libertarianism. Philosophical Perspectives 14: 21–45.Google Scholar

Clarke, R. 2002. Libertarian views: Critical survey of noncausal and event-causal accounts of free agency. In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, ed. Kane, R., pp. 356–385. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, R. 2003. Libertarian Accounts of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, R. and Capes, J.. 2017. Incompatibilist (nondeterministic) theories of free will. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incompatibilism-theories/#3.1.Google Scholar

Coffman, E. J. 2007. Thinking about luck. Synthese 158: 385–398.Google Scholar

Cyr, T. W. 2016. The parallel manipulation argument. Ethics 126(4): 1075–1089.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1963. Actions, reasons and causes. The Journal of Philosophy 60: 685–700.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1973. Freedom to act. In Essays on Freedom and Action, ed. Honderich, T., pp. 67–86. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Demetriou, K. (2010). The soft-line solution to Pereboom’s four-case argument. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88(4): 595–617.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. 1984. Elbow Room. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. 2003. Freedom Evolves. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Deery, O. and Nahmias, E.. 2017. Defeating manipulation arguments: Interventionist causation and compatibilist sourcehood. Philosophical Studies 174: 1255–1276.Google Scholar

Donagan, A. 1987. Choice: The Essential Element in Human Action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Dowell, J. 2006. The physical: Empirical, not metaphysical. Philosophical Studies 131: 25–60.Google Scholar

Driver, J. 2012. Luck and fortune in moral evaluation. In Contrastivism in Philosophy: New Perspectives, ed. Blaauw, M., pp. 154–72. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dworkin, G. 1970a. Acting freely. Nous 4: 367–383.Google Scholar

Dworkin, G. 1970b. Determinism, Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Eccles, J. 1994. How the Self Controls the Brain. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Eccles, J. and Popper, K.. 1977. The Self and Its Brain. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Ekstrom, L. 2000. Free Will: A Philosophical Study. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Elzein, N. 2018. The demand for contrastive explanation. Philosophical Studies, DOI: 10.1007/s11098-018-1065-z.Google Scholar

Enc, B. 2003. How We Act: Causes, Reasons, and Intentions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Enoch, D. 2012. Being responsible, taking responsibility, and penumbral agency. In Luck, Value, and Commitment: Themes from the Ethics of Bernard Williams, eds. Heuer, U. and Lang, G., pp. 95–132. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Enoch, D. and Marmor, A.. 2007. The case against moral luck. Law and Philosophy 26: 405–436.Google Scholar

Eshleman, A. 2019. Moral responsibility. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/.Google Scholar

Farah, M. J. 2012. Neuroethics: The ethical, legal, and societal impact of neuroscience. The Annual Review of Psychology 63: 571–591.Google Scholar

Farah, M. J, Shera, D. M., Savage, J. H., Betancourt, L., Giannetta, J. M., Brodsky, N. L., Malmud, E. K., and Hurt, H.. 2006. Childhood poverty: Specific associations with neurocognitive development. Brain Research 1110: 166–174.Google Scholar

Feldman, R. and Buckareff, A. A.. 2003. Reasons explanation and pure agency. Philosophical Studies 112: 135–145.Google Scholar

Fischer, J. M. 1983. Incompatibilism. Philosophical Studies 43: 121–137.Google Scholar

Fischer, J. M. 1994. The Metaphysics of Free Will: An Essay on Control. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fischer, J. M. 2007. Compatibilism. In Four Views on Free Will, eds. Fischer, J. M., Kane, R., Pereboom, D., and Vargas, M.. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fischer, J. M. 2011. The zygote argument remixed. Analysis 71(2): 267–272.Google Scholar

Fischer, J. M. 2014. Review of Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. Science, Religion, and Culture 1(3): 202–208.Google Scholar

Fischer, J. M. and Ravizza, M.. 1998. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Foster, J. 1991. The Immaterial Self: A Defense of the Cartesian Dualist Conception of Mind. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, H. G. 1969. Alternative possibilities and moral responsibility. Journal of Philosophy 66: 828–839.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, H. G. 1971. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. Journal of Philosophy 68(1): 5–20.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, H. G. 1988. The Importance of What We Care About. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Franklin, C. 2011a. The problem of enhanced control. Australian Journal of Philosophy 89: 687–706.Google Scholar

Franklin, C. 2011b. Farwell to the luck (or mind) argument. Philosophical Studies 156: 199–230.Google Scholar

Franklin, C. 2015. Agent-causation, explanation, and akrasia: A reply to Levy’s hard luck. Criminal Law and Philosophy 9: 753–770.Google Scholar

Garret, B. J. 2013. Review of Levy’s hard luck. Philosophy in Review 33: 212–214.Google Scholar

Gert, H. J. 2017. Awareness luck. Philosophia. DOI: 10.1007/s11406-017-9901-5.Google Scholar

Ginet, C. 1966. Might we have no choice? In Freedom and Determinism, ed. Lehrer, K., pp. 87–104. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Ginet, C. 1980. The conditional analysis of freedom. In van Inwagen 1980, pp. 171–186.Google Scholar

Ginet, C. 1990. On Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ginet, C. 1995. Reasons explanation of action: An incompatibilist account. In Agents, Causes, and Events, ed. O’Connor, T., pp. 69–93. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ginet, C. 1996. In defense of the principle of alternative possibilities: Why I don’t find Frankfurt’s argument convincing. Philosophical Perspectives 10: 403–417.Google Scholar

Ginet, C. 1997. Freedom, responsibility, and agency. Journal of Ethics 1: 85–98.Google Scholar

Ginet, C. 2002. Review of living without free will. Journal of Ethics 6: 305–309.Google Scholar

Ginet, C. 2007. An action can be both uncaused and up to the agent. In Intentionality, Deliberation, and Autonomy, eds. Lumer, C. and Nannini, S., pp. 243–256. Farnhnam, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Ginet, C. 2008. In defense of a non-causal account of reasons explanation. Journal of Ethics 12(3–4): 229–237.Google Scholar

Gladwell, M. 2008. Outliers: The Story of Success. New York: Little Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Greco, J. 1995. A second paradox concerning responsibility and luck. Metaphilosophy 26: 81–96.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. 2010. Why agent-causal actions are not lucky. American Philosophical Quarterly 47: 43–56.Google Scholar

Haas, D. 2013. In defense of hard-line replies to the multiple-case manipulation argument. Philosophical Studies 163: 797–811.Google Scholar

Haji, I. 1999. Indeterminism and Frankfurt style examples. Philosophical Explorations 2: 42–58.Google Scholar

Haji, I. 2000. Indeterminism, explanation, and luck. The Journal of Ethics 4(3): 211–235.Google Scholar

Haji, I. 2002. Deontic Morality and Control. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haji, I. 2004. Active control, agent-causation and free action. Philosophical Explorations 7(2): 131–148.Google Scholar

Haji, I. 2005. Libertarianism, luck, and action explanation. Journal of Philosophical Research 30: 321–340.Google Scholar

Haji, I. 2014. Event-causal libertarianism’s control conundrum. Grazer Philosophische Studien 88: 227–246.Google Scholar

Haji, I. 2016. Luck’s Mischief. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hales, S. 2016. Why every theory of luck is wrong. Nous 50: 490–508.Google Scholar

Harrison, G. K. 2010. A challenge for soft-line replies to manipulation cases. Philosophia 38(3): 555–568.Google Scholar

Hartman, R. J. 2017. In Defense of Moral Luck: Why Luck Often Affects Praiseworthiness and Blameworthiness. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hasker, W. 1999. The Emergent Self. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Honderich, T. 2002. How Free Are We? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Humbach, J. A. 2019. Do criminal minds cause crime? Neuroscience and the physicalism dilemma. Washing University Jurisprudence Review 12(1): 1–29.Google Scholar

Hume, D. 1739/1978. A Treatise of Human Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hume, D. 1743/1960. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Jeppsson, S. 2016. Accountability, answerability, and freedom. Social Theory and Practice 42(4): 681–705.Google Scholar

Kane, R. 1985. Free Will and Values. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Kane, R. 1996. The Significance of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kane, R. 1999. Responsibility, luck, and chance: Reflections on free will and indeterminism. Journal of Philosophy 96: 217–240.Google Scholar

Kane, R. 2002. Some neglected pathways in the free will labyrinth. In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, ed. Kane, R., pp. 406–437. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kane, R. 2007. Libertarianism. In Four Views on Free Will, eds. Fischer, J. M., Kane, R., Pereboom, D., and Vargas, M., pp. 5–43. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kane, R. 2011. Rethinking free will: New perspectives on an ancient problem. In Oxford Handbook of Free Will, ed. Kane, R., pp. 381–404. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kane, R. 2016. The complex tapestry of free will: Striving will, indeterminism, and volition streams. Synthese 196: 145–160.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1781/1787/1987. Critique of Pure Reason, tr. Guyer, P. and Wood, A.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1785/1981. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, tr. Ellington, J.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1788/1996. Critique of Practical Reasons, tr. Mary, Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kim, J. 1990. Supervenience as a philosophical concept. Metaphilosophy 21: 1–27.Google Scholar

Kim, J. 1993. Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kim, J. 1999. Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies 95: 3–36.Google Scholar

King, M. 2013. The problem with manipulation. Ethics 124: 65–83.Google Scholar

Lamb, J. 1977. On a proof of incompatibilism. The Philosophical Review 86: 20–35.Google Scholar

Latus, A. 2000. Moral and epistemic luck. Journal of Philosophical Research 25: 149–172.Google Scholar

Latus, A. 2003. Constitutive luck. Metaphilosophy 34: 460–475.Google Scholar

Lehrer, K. 1964. “Could” and determinism. Analysis 24: 159–160.Google Scholar

Lehrer, K. 1966. An empirical disproof of determinism. In Freedom and Determinism, ed. Lehrer, K., pp. 175–202. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Lehrer, K. 1968. Cans without ifs. Analysis 29(1): 29–32.Google Scholar

Lehrer, K. 1976. “Can” in theory and practice: A possible worlds analysis. In Action Theory, eds. Brand, M. and Walton, D., pp. 67–97. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar

Lehrer, K. 1980. Preferences, conditionals and freedom. In Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor, ed. van Inwagen, P., pp. 76–96. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar

Lemos, J. 2018. A Pragmatic Approach to Libertarian Free Will. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lemos, J. 2019. Kane, Pereboom, and event-causal libertarianism. Philosophia, doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-0098-0.Google Scholar

Levin, M. 1979. Metaphysics and the Mind-Body Problem. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Levy, N. 2008. Bad luck once again. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77(3): 749–754.Google Scholar

Levy, N. 2009a. Luck and history-sensitive compatibilism. Philosophical Quarterly 59(235): 237–251.Google Scholar

Levy, N. 2009b. Culpable ignorance and moral responsibility: A reply to Firtzpatrich. Ethics 119(4): 729–741.Google Scholar

Levy, N. 2011. Hard Luck: How Luck Undermines Free Will and Moral Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Levy, N. 2019. Putting the luck back in moral luck. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 43(1): 59–74.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1981. Are we free to break the laws? Theoria 47: 113–121.Google Scholar

Lewis, P. T. 2016. Quantum Ontology: A Guide to the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

List, C. 2019. Why Free Will is Real. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lycan, W. G. 1997. Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mariani, M. 2017. The neuroscience of inequality: Does poverty show up in children’s brains? The Guardian (July 13). www.theguardian.com/inequality/2017/jul/13/neuroscience-inequality-does-poverty-show-up-in-childrens-brainsGoogle Scholar

Matheson, B. (2016). In defense of the four-case argument. Philosophical Studies 173(7): 1963–1982.Google Scholar

McKenna, M. 2004. Responsibility and globally manipulation agents. Philosophical Topics 32: 169–192.Google Scholar

McKenna, M. 2005. Reasons reactivity and incompatibilist intuitions. Philosophical Explorations 8(2): 131–143.Google Scholar

McKenna, M. 2008. A hard-line reply to Pereboom’s four-case manipulation argument. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77(1): 142–159.Google Scholar

McKenna, M. 2013. Reasons-responsiveness, agents, and mechanisms. In Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, Vol. 1, ed. Shoemaker, D., pp.151–183. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McKenna, M. 2014. Resisting the manipulation argument: A hard-liner takes it on the chin. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87(2): 467–487.Google Scholar

McKenna, M. and Pereboom, D.. 2016. Free Will: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mele, A. R. 1992. The Springs of Action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mele, A. R. 1995. Autonomous Agents. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mele, A. R. 1998. Review of Robert Kane’s The Significance of Free Will. Journal of Philosophy 93: 581–584.Google Scholar

Mele, A. R. 1999. Ultimate responsibility and dumb luck. Social Philosophy and Policy 16(2): 274–293.Google Scholar

Mele, A. R. 2001. Autonomous Agents. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mele, A. R. 2005. Libertarianism, luck, and control. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86(3): 381–407.Google Scholar

Mele, A. R. 2006. Free Will and Luck. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mele, A. R. 2008. Manipulation, compatibilism, and moral responsibility. The Journal of Ethics 12: 263–286.Google Scholar

Mele, A. R. 2017. Aspects of Agency: Decisions, Abilities, Explanations, and Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mele, A. R. 2019. Manipulated Agents: A Window to Moral Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mickelson, K. 2010. The soft-line solution to Pereboom’s four-case argument. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88(4): 595–617.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1860/1947. On Liberty. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1865/1979. An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy, ed. Robson, J. M.. Toronto: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Montesano Montessori, A. A. 2017. Can agents be causes? A critique of Timothy O’Connor’s Theory of Free Action. Faculty of Humanities Thesis, Utrecht University. Available at: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/354579.Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. 1912. Free will. In Ethics, ed. Moore, G. E., pp. 84–95. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moore, M. 1997. Placing Blame: A General Theory of Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morse, S. J. 2008. Determinism and the death of folk psychology: Two challenges to responsibility from neuroscience. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science, and Technology 9(1): 1–36.Google Scholar

Morse, S. J. 2016. The inevitable mind in the age of neuroscience. In Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience, eds. Patterson, D. and Pardo, M. S., pp. 29–50. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. 1979. Moral luck. In Mortal Questions, pp. 24–38. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Neely, W. 1974. Freedom and desire. Philosophical Review 83: 32–54.Google Scholar

Nelkin, D. 2012. Replies in session on Making Sense of Freedom and Responsibility, Pacific Division Meeting of the American Philosophical Association, Seattle, Washington, April.Google Scholar

Nelkin, D. 2013. Moral luck. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. First published January 26, 2004, with substantive revision April 10, 2013.Google Scholar

Nielsen, K. 1971. Reason and Practice: A Modern Introduction to Philosophy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. 1886/1992. Beyond Good and Evil. Trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Novle, K., McCandiss, B., and Farah, M.. 2007. Socioeconomic gradients predict individual differences in neurocognitive abilities. Developmental Science 10(4): 464–480.Google Scholar

Noble, K., Norman, M. F., and Farah, F.. 2005. Neurocognitive correlates of socioeconomic status in kindergarten children. Developmental Science 8(1): 74–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O’Connor, T. 1995. Agent causation. In Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will, ed. O’Connor, T., pp. 173–200. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

O’Connor, T. 1996. Why agent causation? Philosophical Topics 24(2): 143–158.Google Scholar

O’Connor, T. 2000a. Persons and Causes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

O’Connor, T. 2000b. Causality, mind, and free will. Philosophical Perspectives 14: 05–17.Google Scholar

O’Connor, T. 2002. Libertarian views: Dualist and agent-causal theories. In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, ed. Kane, R., pp. 337–355. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

O’Connor, T. 2005. Freedom with a human face. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29: 207–27.Google Scholar

O’Connor, T. 2009a. Agent-causal power. In Dispositions and Causes, ed. Handfield, T., pp. 189–214. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

O’Connor, T. 2009b. Degrees of freedom. Philosophical Explorations 12: 119–125.Google Scholar

O’Connor, T. 2011. Agent-causal theories of freedom. In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, 2nd edition, ed. Kane, R., pp. 308–328. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Papineau, D. 2002. Thinking About Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Paskell, M. R. 2014. Manipulation, Argument, and Experiment: Putting Folk Intuitions into Context. Honors Thesis. University of Arizona. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/321908.Google Scholar

Peels, R. 2015. The modal solution to the problem of moral luck. American Philosophical Quarterly 52: 73–87.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 1995. Determinism al dente. Nous 29: 21–45.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2001. Living without Free Will. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2004. Is our conception of agent causation incoherent? Philosophical Topics 29: 228–247.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2007. Hard incompatibilism. In Four Views on Free Will, eds. Fischer, J. M., Kane, R., Pereboom, D., and Vargas, M., pp. 85–125. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2008. A hard-line reply to the multiple-case manipulation argument. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77(1): 160–170.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2011. Consciousness and the Prospects of Physicalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2014a. Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2014b. Responses to John Martin Fischer and Dana Nelkin. Science, Religion and Culture 1(3): 218.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2017. Responsibility, agency, and the disappearing agent objection. In Le Libre-Arbitre: Approaches Contemporaines, ed. Guillon, J-B, pp. 1–18. Paris, France: College de France.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2018. Review of Alfred R. Mele’s Aspects of Agency: Decisions, Abilities, Explanations, and Free Will. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, June 27. Available online: https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/aspects-of-agency-decisions-abilities-explanations-and-free-will/.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2021. Lynne Baker on constitution, nonreductivism, and emergence. In Common Sense Metaphysics: Themes from the Philosophy of Lynne Rudder Baker, eds. Oliveira, L. R. and Corcoran, K.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. and Caruso, G. D.. 2018. Hard-incompatibilism existentialism: Neuroscience, punishment, and meaning in life. In Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience, eds. Caruso, G. D. and Flanagan, O., pp. 193–222. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D and McKenna, M.. 2021. Manipulation arguments against compatibilism. In Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility, eds. Kay Nelkin, D. and Pereboom, D.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pritchard, D. 2005. Epistemic Luck. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pritchard, D. 2014. The modal account of luck. Metaphilosophy 45(4–5): 594–619.Google Scholar

Reid, T. 1788/1983. Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Reid, T. 1985. The Works of Thomas Reid, D.D., Vols. 1 & 2, 8th ed., Sir William Hamilton, Edinburg: James Thin. Reprinted with an introduction by H. M. Bracken. Hildeshein: George Olms Verlad, 1967.Google Scholar

Rivera-Lopez, E. 2016. How to reject resultant moral luck alone. Journal of Value Inquiry 50: 415–423.Google Scholar

Rosen, G. 2002. Culpability and ignorance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103(1): 61–84.Google Scholar

Rosen, G. 2004. Skepticism about moral responsibility. Philosophical Perspectives 18: 295–313.Google Scholar

Rosen, G. 2008. Kleinbart on the oblivious and other tales of ignorance and responsibility. Journal of Philosophy 105(10): 591–610.Google Scholar

Sartorio, C. 2016. Causation and Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schlick, M. 1939. The Problems of Ethics. Authorized translation by David Rynin. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Schlick, M. 1966. When is a man responsible? In Free Will and Determinism, ed. Berofsky, B., pp. 54–62. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Sifferd, K. L. 2006. In defense of the use of commonsense psychology in the criminal law. Law and Philosophy 25(6): 571–612.Google Scholar

Sifferd, K. L. 2014. What does it mean to be a mechanism? Stephen Morse, non-reductivism, and mental causation. Criminal Law and Philosophy 11: 143–159.Google Scholar

Shoemaker, D. 2011. Attributability, answerability, and accountability: Toward a wider theory of moral responsibility. Ethics 121: 602–632.Google Scholar

Shoemaker, D. 2016. Responsibility From the Margins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stace, W. T. 1952. Religion and the Modern Mind. New York: Lippincott. An excerpt of which is reprinted in Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary Readings, 3rd ed. L. Pojman, pp. 382–387. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Steward, H. 1997. The Ontology of Mind: Events, Processes, and States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Steward, H. 2012. A Metaphysics for Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stout, R. 1996. Things That Happen Because They Should: A Teleological Approach to Action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Strawson, G. 1986. Freedom and Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Strawson, G. 1994. The impossibility of moral responsibility. Philosophical Studies 75(1–2): 5–24.Google Scholar

Strawson, G. 2010. Freedom and Belief, revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. 1962. Freedom and resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy 68: 187–211.Google Scholar

Swinburne, R. 1986. The Evolution of the Soul. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. 1966. Action and Purpose. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. 1974. Metaphysic, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Tierney, H. 2013. A maneuver around the modified manipulation argument. Philosophical Studies 165(3): 753–763.Google Scholar

Tierney, H. 2014. Tackling it head one: How best to handle the modified manipulation argument. Journal of Value Inquiry 48(4): 663–675.Google Scholar

Tierney, H. and Glick, D.. 2020. Desperately seeking sourcehood. Philosophical Studies 177: 953–970.Google Scholar

Todd, P. 2011. A new approach to manipulation arguments. Philosophical Studies 152: 127–133.Google Scholar

Todd, P. 2012. Manipulation and moral standing: An argument for incompatibilism. Philosophical Imprint 12: 1–18.Google Scholar

Todd, P. 2013. Defending (a modified version of) the zygote argument. Philosophical Studies 164: 189–203.Google Scholar

Todd, P. 2017. Manipulation arguments and the freedom to do otherwise. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95(2): 395–407.Google Scholar

Tognazzini, N. A. 2012. Review of hard luck: How luck undermines free will and moral responsibility. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90: 809–812.Google Scholar

Tognazzini, N. A. 2014. The structure of a manipulation argument. Ethics 124(2): 358–369.Google Scholar

Vaidman, L. 2014. Quantum theory and determinism. Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations 1: 5–38.Google Scholar

van Gulick, R. 2001. Reduction, emergence and other recent options on the mind/body problem: A philosophical overview. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(9–10): 1–34.Google Scholar

van Inwagen, P. 1975. The incompatibility of free will and determinism. Philosophical Studies 25: 185–199.Google Scholar

van Inwagen, P. 1983. An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Van Miltenburg, N. 2015. Freedom in Action. Utrecht: Quaestiones Infinitae.Google Scholar

Vargas, M. 2007. Revisionism. In Four Views on Free Will, eds. Fischer, J. M., Kane, R., Pereboom, D., and Vargas, M., pp. 126–165. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Vargas, M. 2009. Revisionism and free will: A statement and defense. Philosophical Studies 144(1): 45–62.Google Scholar

Vargas, M. 2011. Revisionist accounts of free will: Origins, varieties, and challenges. In Oxford Handbook on Free Will, 2nd edition, ed. Kane, R., pp. 457–484. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vargas, M. 2013. Building Better Beings: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vargas, M. 2019. Responsibility, methodology and desert. The Journal of Information Ethics: 131–147.Google Scholar

Vicens, L. 2015. Self-forming actions and conflicts of intention. Southwest Philosophical Review 31(1): 93–100.Google Scholar

Vicente, A. 2006. On the causal completeness of physics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20(2): 149–171.Google Scholar

Vihvelin, K. 2007. Arguments for incompatibilism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/spr2010/entries/incompatibilism-arguments/.Google Scholar

Wallace, R. J. 1994. Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wallace, R. J. 1997. Review of John Martin Fischer’s The Metaphysics of Free Will. Journal of Philosophy 94(3): 156–159.Google Scholar

Waller, B. 1988. Free will gone out of control. Behaviorism 16: 149–162.Google Scholar

Waller, B. N. 1989. Denying responsibility: The difference it makes. Analysis 49: 44–47.Google Scholar

Waller, B. 1990. Freedom Without Responsibility. New York: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Waller, B. 2004. Virtue unrewarded: Morality without moral responsibility. Philosophia 31: 3–4.Google Scholar

Waller, B. 2011. Against Moral Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Waller, B. 2015. The Stubborn System of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Waller, R. 2014. The threat of effective intentions to moral responsibility in the zygote argument. Philosophia 42(1): 209–222.Google Scholar

Watson, G. 1975. Free agency. Journal of Philosophy 72: 205–220.Google Scholar

Watson, G. 1996. Two faces of responsibility. Philosophical Topics 24: 227–248.Google Scholar

Widerker, D. 1995. Libertarianism and Frankfurt’s attack on the principle of alternative possibilities. The Philosophical Review 104: 247–261.Google Scholar

Widerker, D. 2005. Agent-causation and control. Faith and Philosophy 22: 87–98.Google Scholar

Widerker, D. 2006. Libertarianism and the philosophical significance of Frankfurt scenarios. Journal of Philosophy 103: 163–187.Google Scholar

Williams, B. 1981. Moral Luck. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, B. 1993. Postscript. In Moral Luck, ed. Statman, D., pp. 251–258. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. L. 1976. On the nature of consciousness and physical reality. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 19: 568–581.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. L. 1995. Seeking the neural correlate of consciousness. American Scientist 83: 269–270.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. L. 1999. Mind-brain interaction and violation of physical laws. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(8–9): 185–200.Google Scholar

Woodward, J. (2003). Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, M. 1987. Luck and moral responsibility. Ethics 97: 374–386.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, M. 1997. Moral responsibility and ignorance. Ethics 107(3): 410–426.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, M. 2002. Taking luck seriously. The Journal of Philosophy 99: 553–576.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, M. 2009. Living with Uncertainty: The Moral Significance of Ignorance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Alexander, L., Ferzan, K. K., and Morse, S.. 2009. Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Balaguer, M. 2009. Free Will as an Open Scientific Problem. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Berman, M. 2008. Punishment and justification. Ethics 18: 258–290.Google Scholar

Boonin, D. 2008. The Problem of Punishment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, C. A. 1957. On Selfhood and Godhood. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2013. Introduction: Exploring the illusion of free will and moral responsibility. In Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility, ed. Caruso, G. D., pp. 1–16. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2016. Free will skepticism and criminal behavior: A public health–quarantine model. Southwest Philosophy Review 32(1): 25–48.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2017a. Public Health and Safety: The Social Determinants of Health and Criminal Behavior. UK: ResearchLinks Books.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2017b. Free will skepticism and the question of creativity: Creativity, desert, and self-creation. Ergo 3(23): 23–39.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2018. Skepticism about moral responsibility. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism-moral-responsibility/Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2020. Justice without retribution: An epistemic argument against retributive criminal punishment. Neuroethics 13(1): 13–28.Google Scholar

Caruso, G. D. 2021. The public health–quarantine model. In Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility, eds. Nelkin, D. and Pereboom, D.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chisholm, R. 1982. Human freedom and the self. In Free Will, ed. Watson, G., pp. 24–35. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, T. 2012. Clark comments on Dennett’s review of Against Moral Responsibility. Naturalism.Org: www.naturalism.org/resources/book-reviews/exchange-on-wallers-against-moral-responsibility#toc-clark-comments-on-dennetts-review-of-against-moral-respo-UN0XiqrR.Google Scholar

Corrado, M. L. 2013a. Why do we resist hard incompatibilism? Thoughts on freedom and punishment. In The Future of Punishment, ed. Nadelhoffer, T., pp. 79–106. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Corrado, M. L. 2013b. Presumed Dangerous: Punishment, Responsibility, and Preventive Detention in American Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar

Corrado, M. L. 2017. Punishment and the burden of proof. UNC Legal Studies Research Paper. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2997654 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2997654.Google Scholar

Corrado, M. L. 2019a. Criminal quarantine and the burden of proof. Philosophia 47(4): 1095–1110.Google Scholar

Corrado, M. L. 2019b. Fichte and the psychopath: Criminal justice turned upside down. In Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society, eds. Shaw, E., Pereboom, D., and Caruso, G., pp. 161–176. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. 2012. Review of Against Moral Responsibility by Bruce Waller and Dennett’s Rejoinder to Clark. Naturalism.org: www.naturalism.org/resources/book-reviews/dennett-review-of-against-moral-responsibility.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. and Caruso, G. D.. 2021. Just Deserts: Debating Free Will. New York: Polity Books.Google Scholar

Double, R. 2002. The moral hardness of libertarianism. Philo 5: 226–234.Google Scholar

Double, R. 2017. The Hard-heartedness of some libertarians: A reply to John Lemos. Journal of Philosophical Research 42: 313–318.Google Scholar

Double, R. 2020. Review of John Lemos’ A Pragmatic Approach to Libertarian Free Will. Criminal Law and Philosophy: doi.org/10.1007/s11572-020-09525-w.Google Scholar

Fischer, J. M. 1994. The Metaphysics of Free Will: An Essay on Control. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

James, W. 1884/1956. The dilemma of determinism. In The Will to Believe: Human Immortality, pp. 145–183. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Jeppsson, S. M. I. 2020. Retributivism, justification and credence: The epistemic argument revisited. Neuroethics: doi.org/10.1007/s12152-020-09436-6.Google Scholar

Kane, R. 1996. The Significance of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1790. The Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by W. Hastie. Radford, VA: A&D Books.Google Scholar

Lemos, J. 2018. A Pragmatic Approach to Libertarian Free Will. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Levy, N. 2011. Hard Luck: How Luck Undermines Free Will and Moral Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mele, A. R. 2006. Free Will and Luck. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mele, A. R. 2017. Aspects of Agency: Decisions, Abilities, Explanations, and Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morse, S. J. 2013. Common criminal law compatibilism. In Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility, ed. Vincent, N. A.. New York: Oxford University press.Google Scholar

Morse, S. J. 2015a. Criminal law and common sense: An essay on the perils and promise of neuroscience. Marquette Law Review 99: 39–72.Google Scholar

Morse, S. J. 2015b. Neuroscience, free will, and criminal responsibility. In Free Will and the Brain: Neuroscientific, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives, ed. Glannon, W., pp. 251–286. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Morse, S. J. 2018. The neuroscientific non-challenge to meaning, morals, and purpose. In Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience, eds. Caruso, G. D. and Flanagan, O., pp. 333–358. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nichols, S. 2007. After compatibilism: A naturalistic defense of the reactive attitudes. Philosophical Perspectives 21: 405–428.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2001. Living without Free Will. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2014. Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2017. A defense of free will skepticism: Replies to commentaries by Victor Tadros, Saul Smilansky, Michael McKenna, and Alfred R. Mele on free will, agency, and meaning in life. Criminal Law and Philosophy 11(3): 617–636.Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. and Caruso, G. D.. 2018. Hard-incompatibilist existentialism: Neuroscience, punishment, and meaning in life. In Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience, eds. Caruso, G. D. and Flanagan, O., pp. 193–222. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pigliucci, M. and Boudry, M.. 2014. Prove it! The burden of proof game in science vs. pseudoscience disputes. Philosophia 42: 487–502.Google Scholar

Shaw, E. 2014. Free Will, Punishment, and Criminal Responsibility. Dissertation Thesis. Edinburgh University. Available at: https://era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/9590/Shaw2014.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar

Strawson, G. 1986. Freedom and Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Strawson, G. 1994. The impossibility of moral responsibility. Philosophical Studies 75(1): 5–24.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. 1982. Freedom and resentment. In Free Will, ed. Watson, G., pp. 59–80. New York: Oxford University Press. (Originally punished in Proceedings of the British Academy 36 [1962].)Google Scholar

Tadros, V. 2011. The End of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. 1974. Metaphysic, 4th edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

van Inwagen, P. 1983. An Essay on Free Will. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

van Inwagen, P. 2000. Free will remains a mystery. Philosophical Perspectives 14: 1–19.Google Scholar

Vargas, M. 2007. Revisionism. In Four Views on Free Will, eds. Fischer, J. M., Kane, R., Pereboom, D., and Vargas, M., pp. 126–165. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar