Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Compliance as the Interaction between Rules and Behavior
- Part I Compliance Concepts and Approaches
- Part II Deterrence and Incapacitation
- Part III Incentives
- Part IV Legitimacy and Social Norms
- Part V Capacity and Opportunity
- Part VI Compliance and Cognition
- Part VII Management and Organizational Processes
- 39 Compliance Management Systems: Do They Make a Difference?
- 40 Business Codes: A Review of the Literature
- 41 Third Party and Appointed Monitorships
- 42 Ethics and Compliance Training
- 43 The Social and Organizational Psychology of Compliance: How Organizational Culture Impacts on (Un)ethical Behavior
- 44 Organizational Factors and Workplace Deviance: Influences of Abusive Supervision, Dysfunctional Employees, and Toxic Work Environments
- 45 Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG, and Compliance
- 46 Agency, Authority, and Compliance
- 47 Life-Course Criminology and Corporate Offending
- Part VIII Measuring and Evaluating Compliance
- Part IX Analysis of Particular Fields
- References
42 - Ethics and Compliance Training
from Part VII - Management and Organizational Processes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 May 2021
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Compliance as the Interaction between Rules and Behavior
- Part I Compliance Concepts and Approaches
- Part II Deterrence and Incapacitation
- Part III Incentives
- Part IV Legitimacy and Social Norms
- Part V Capacity and Opportunity
- Part VI Compliance and Cognition
- Part VII Management and Organizational Processes
- 39 Compliance Management Systems: Do They Make a Difference?
- 40 Business Codes: A Review of the Literature
- 41 Third Party and Appointed Monitorships
- 42 Ethics and Compliance Training
- 43 The Social and Organizational Psychology of Compliance: How Organizational Culture Impacts on (Un)ethical Behavior
- 44 Organizational Factors and Workplace Deviance: Influences of Abusive Supervision, Dysfunctional Employees, and Toxic Work Environments
- 45 Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG, and Compliance
- 46 Agency, Authority, and Compliance
- 47 Life-Course Criminology and Corporate Offending
- Part VIII Measuring and Evaluating Compliance
- Part IX Analysis of Particular Fields
- References
Summary
Abstract: An essential component of ethics and compliance programs is the training of organizational members. Training helps ensure that all employees understand their legal and regulatory obligations, and company policies. There are significant legal incentives for organizations to adopt training, but understanding when training is effective is challenging. After discussing the legal incentives, this chapter explores how effectiveness can be measured, and reviews those factors that the academic literature has identified as potentially having a positive impact on training effectiveness.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance , pp. 616 - 625Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Antes, Alison L., Murphy, Stephen T., Waples, Ethan P., Mumford, Michael D., Brown, Ryan P., Connelly, Shane, and Devenport, Lynn D.. 2009. “Meta-analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences.” Ethics & Behavior 19: 379–402.Google Scholar
Burke, M. J., and Sockbeson, C. E. S.. 2016. “Safety Training.” In Clarke, S., Probst, T. M., Guldenmund, F., and Passmore, J. (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Occupational Safety and Workplace Health, 327–56. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Burke, M. J., Sarpy, S. A., Smith-Crowe, K., Chan-Serafin, S., Salvador, R. O., and Islam, G.. 2006. “Relative Effectiveness of Worker Safety and Health Training Methods.” American Journal of Public Health 96: 315–24.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, and Kalev, Alexandra. 2019. “The Promise and Peril of Sexual Harassment Programs.” PNAS 116(25): 12255–60. www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2019/05/29/1818477116.full.pdf.Google Scholar
Feldblum, Chai R., and Lipnic, Victoria A.. 2016. US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Select Task Force on the Study of Harassment in the Workplace. Washington, DC: US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.Google Scholar
Gentile, Mary C. 2010. Giving Voice to Values: How to Speak Your Mind When You Know What’s Right. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, C. 2019. “Fighting Against Corruption: Does Anti‐corruption Training Make Any Difference?” Journal of Business Ethics 159(1): 281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, David. 2016. “Ethical Infrastructures and Evidence-Based Corporate Compliance and Ethics Programs: Policy Implications from the Empirical Evidence.” New York University Journal of Law and Business 12(2): 317–68.Google Scholar
Medeiros, K. E., Watts, L. L., Mulhearn, T. J., Steele, L. M., Mumford, M. D., and Connelly, S.. 2017. “What Is Working, What Is Not, and What We Need to Know: A Meta-analytic Review of Business Ethics Instruction.” Journal of Academic Ethics 15(3): 245–75.Google Scholar
Paine, L. S. 1994. “Managing for Organizational Integrity.” Harvard Business Review 72(2): 106–17.Google Scholar
Parker, C., and Nielsen, V. L.. 2009. “Corporate Compliance Systems: Could They Make Any Difference?” Administration and Society, 41(1): 3–37.Google Scholar
Roehling, Mark V., and Huang, Jason. 2018. “Sexual Harassment Training Effectiveness: An Interdisciplinary Review and Call for Research.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 39: 134–50.Google Scholar
Sekerka, Leslie E. 2009. “Organizational Ethics Education and Training: A Review of Best Practices and Their Application.” International Journal of Training and Development 13(2): 77–95.Google Scholar
Smith-Crowe, K., Tenbrunsel, A. E., Chan-Serafin, S., Brief, A. P., Umphress, E. E., and Joseph, J.. 2014. “The Ethics “Fix”: When Formal Systems Make a Difference.” Journal of Business Ethics 1: 10.1007/s10551-013-2022-6.Google Scholar
Steele, Logan M., Mulhearn, Tyler J., Medeiros, Kelsey E., Watts, Logan L., Connelly, Shane and Mumford, Michael D.. 2016. “How Do We Know What Works? A Review and Critique of Current Practices in Ethics Training Evaluation.” Accountability in Research 23(6): 319–50.Google Scholar
Tippett, Elizabeth C. 2018. “Harassment Trainings: A Content Analysis.” Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 39: 481–526.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). 2012. “Former Morgan Stanley Managing Director Pleads Guilty for Role in Evading Internal Controls Required by FCPA.” April 25, www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-morgan-stanley-managing-director-pleads-guilty-role-evading-internal-controls-required.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Criminal Division. 2019. Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (updated April 2019).Google Scholar
Waples, Ethan P., Antes, Alison L., Murphy, Stephan T., Connelly, Shane, and Mumford, Michael D.. 2009. “A Meta-analytic Investigation of Business Ethics Instruction.” Journal of Business Ethics 87: 133–51.Google Scholar
Warren, Danielle E., Gaspar, Joseph P., and Laufer, William S.. 2014. “Is Formal Ethics Training Merely Cosmetic? A Study of Ethics Training and Ethical Organizational Culture.” Business Ethics Quarterly 24(1): 85–117.Google Scholar
Watts, Logan L., Medeiros, Kelsey E., Mulhearn, Tyler J., Steele, Logan M., Connelly, Shane, and Mumford, Michael D.. 2017. “Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences.” Ethics & Behavior 27(5): 351–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, James. 2015. “Investigating and Assessing the Quality of Employee Ethics Training Programs among US-Based Global Organizations.” Journal of Business Ethics 129: 27–42.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 1
- Cited by