Book contents
- New Private Law Theory
- New Private Law Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- New Private Law Theory
- Part I Methods and Disciplines
- Part II Social Ordering, Constitutionalism and Private Law
- Part III Transactions and Risk: Private Law and the Market
- Part IV Persons and Organizations
- Part V Private Law (Rule-Setting) beyond the State
- Index
- References
Part III - Transactions and Risk: Private Law and the Market
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 April 2021
Book contents
- New Private Law Theory
- New Private Law Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- New Private Law Theory
- Part I Methods and Disciplines
- Part II Social Ordering, Constitutionalism and Private Law
- Part III Transactions and Risk: Private Law and the Market
- Part IV Persons and Organizations
- Part V Private Law (Rule-Setting) beyond the State
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- New Private Law TheoryA Pluralist Approach, pp. 205 - 338Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Raiser, L, ‘Vertragsfunktion und Vertragsfreiheit’, Festschrift Deutscher Juristentag 101–31 (1960). (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
Kaplow, L / Shavell, S, ‘Should Legal Rules Favor the Poor? Clarifying the Role of Legal Rules and the Income Tax in Redistributing Income’, 29 Journal of Legal Studies 821–835 (2000)Google Scholar
Kahneman, D /Tversky, A, ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, 185 Science 1124–31 (1974)Google Scholar
Benson, Peter, Justice in Transactions: A Theory of Contract Law (Cambridge / MA: Harvard University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch / Heller, Michael, Choice Theory of Contracts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Charles, Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation (Cambridge / MA: Harvard University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John, ‘Measurement of Social Power, Opportunity Costs, and the Theory of Two-Person Bargaining Games’, 7 Behavioral Science 67–80 (1962)Google Scholar
Josserand, Louis, ‘Le contrat dirigé’, 32 Dalloz – Recueil hebdomadaire, croniques 89–92 (1933).Google Scholar
Posner, Eric, ‘Economic Analysis of Contract Law after Three Decades: Success or Failure?’, 112 Yale Law Journal 829–80 (2003)Google Scholar
Schmidt-Rimpler, Walter, ‘Grundfragen der Erneuerung des Vertragsrechts’, 147 Archiv für civilistische Praxis 130–97 (1941).Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard / Sunstein, Cass, ‘Libertarian Paternalism’, 93 American Economic Review 175–9 (2003)Google Scholar
von Hayek, Friedrich A., ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, 35 The American Economic Review 519–30 (1945)Google Scholar
Stigler, George, ‘The Economics of Information’, 69 Journal of Political Economy 213–25 (1961)Google Scholar
Akerlof, George, ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’, 84 Quarterly Journal of Economics 488–500 (1970)Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, Omri, ‘The Myth of “Opportunity to Read” in Contract Law’, 5 European Review of Contract Law 1–28 (2009)Google Scholar
Spence, Michael, ‘Job Market Signaling’, 83 Quarterly Journal of Economics 355–77 (1973)Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph, ‘The Theory of Screening, Education and the Distribution of Income’, 65 The American Economic Review 283–300 (1975)Google Scholar
Böhm, Franz, ‘Democracy and Economic Power’, in Institut für ausländisches und internationales Wirtschaftsrecht an der Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (ed.), Kartelle und Monopole im modernen Recht (Karlsruhe: C. F. Müller, 1960), pp. 25–46Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, ‘Truth and Power’, in Colin Gordon (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (New York: Pantheon Books, 1980), pp. 109–33Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (2nd ed., New York: Vintage Books, 1995)Google Scholar
Tadros, Victor, ‘Between Governance and Discipline: The Law and Michel Foucault’, 18 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 75–103 (1998)Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine, Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination (New Haven / CT: Yale University Press, 1979), pp. 106–27Google Scholar
Somek, Alexander, ‘Neoliberale Gerechtigkeit’, 51 Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 45–59 (2003) (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
Butler, Judith, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge, 1990)Google Scholar
Somek, Alexander, Engineering Equality: An Essay on European Anti-Discrimination Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Josserand, L, ‘L’évolution de la responsabilité (conférence donnée aux Facultés de Droit de Lisbonne, de Coimbre, de Belgrade, de Bucarest, d’Orades, de Bruxells, à l’institut français de Madrid, aux centres juridiques de L’Institut des Hautes Études marocaines à Rabat et á Casablanca)’, in Josserand, L (ed.), Évolutions et Actualités: Conférences de Droit Civil (Paris: Receuil Sirey, 1936), chapter 29, s. 5, (English translation on the book website)Google Scholar
Calabresi, G, ‘Some thoughts on risk distributions and the law of torts’ (1961) 70 Yale Law Journal 499–553Google Scholar
Brüggemeier, G, Common Principles of Tort Law: A Pre-Statement of Law (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2004)Google Scholar
Calabresi, G, The Future of Law and Economics: Essays in Reform and Recollection (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016)Google Scholar
Geistfeld, M, ‘Risk distribution and the law of torts: carrying Calabresi further’ (2014), 77(2) Law and Contemporary Problems 165–90Google Scholar
De Jong, E, ‘Tort law and judicial risk regulation: bipolar and multipolar risk reasoning in light of tort law’s regulatory effects’ (2018) 9(1) European Journal of Risk Regulation 14–33Google Scholar
Kaplow, L and Shavell, S, Fairness versus Welfare (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006), pp. 85–154Google Scholar
Wagner, G, ‘The project of harmonising European tort law’ (2005) 42(5) Common Market Law Review 1269–312Google Scholar
Lessig, L, ‘The law of the horse: what cyberlaw might teach’ (1999) 113 Harvard Law Review 501–49Google Scholar
Teubner, G, ‘Societal constitutionalism: alternatives to state-centred constitutional theory?’, in Joerges, C, Sand, I.-J. and Teubner, G (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart, 2004), pp. 3–28Google Scholar
Brownsword, R, Law, Technology and Society: Reimaging the Regulatory Environment (London: Routledge, 2019)Google Scholar
Kroll, J. A, Barocas, S, Felton, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R, Robinson, D. G. and Yu, H, ‘Accountable algorithms’ (2017) 165 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 632Google Scholar
Scherer, M. U, ‘Regulating artificial intelligence systems: risks, challenges, competencies and strategies (2016) 29 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 353Google Scholar
De Franceschi, A and Schulze, R (eds.), Digital Revolution: New Challenges for Law (Munich: C. H. Beck, 2019)Google Scholar
Ebers, M and Navas, S (eds.), Algorithms and Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.)Google Scholar
Grundmann, S, Collins, H, Gómez, F, Rutgers, J and Sirena, P (eds.), European Contract Law in the Digital Age (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2018)Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart, ‘Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study’, 28 American Sociological Review 55–67 (1963)Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver, ‘Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations’, 22 Journal of Law & Economics 233–61 (1979)Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W., ‘Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization’, 12 Research in Organizational Behaviour 295–336 (1990)Google Scholar
Gilson, Ron / Sabel, Charles / Scott, Robert, ‘Vertical Disintegration and Interfirm Collaboration’, 109 Columbia Law Review 431–502 (2009)Google Scholar
Goldberg, Victor P., ‘Relational Exchange: Economics and Complex Contracts’, 23 American Behavioral Scientist 337–52 (1980)Google Scholar
Macneil, Ian, ‘Relational Contract: What We Do and Do Not Know’, 60 Wisconsin Law Review 483–525 (1985)Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunter, ‘Coincidentia Oppositorum: Hybrid Networks beyond Contract and Organization’, in Amstutz, Marc / Teubner, Gunter (eds.), Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Cooperation (Oxford: Hart, 2009), pp. 3–30Google Scholar
Tirole, Jean, ‘Incomplete Contracts: Where Do We Stand?’, 67 Econometrica 741–81 (1990)Google Scholar