Book contents
- Beyond the Algorithm
- Beyond the Algorithm
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The Rise and Scope of Gig Work Regulation
- 2 An Uber Ambivalence
- 3 Invisible Work, Visible Workers
- 4 The Importance of Qualitative Research Approaches to Gig Economy Taxation
- 5 Just a Gig?
- 6 Algorithmic Management, Employment, and the Self in Gig Work
- 7 Regulating Transportation Systems without Authority (or Data)
- 8 Words Matter
- 9 Rewriting the Rules
- 10 What Regulators Could Gain by Listening to Rideshare Drivers
- Index
- References
2 - An Uber Ambivalence
Employee Status, Worker Perspectives, and Regulation in the Gig Economy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 October 2020
By
Edited by
Book contents
- Beyond the Algorithm
- Beyond the Algorithm
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The Rise and Scope of Gig Work Regulation
- 2 An Uber Ambivalence
- 3 Invisible Work, Visible Workers
- 4 The Importance of Qualitative Research Approaches to Gig Economy Taxation
- 5 Just a Gig?
- 6 Algorithmic Management, Employment, and the Self in Gig Work
- 7 Regulating Transportation Systems without Authority (or Data)
- 8 Words Matter
- 9 Rewriting the Rules
- 10 What Regulators Could Gain by Listening to Rideshare Drivers
- Index
- References
Summary
Before beginning to work for Lyft in 2013, Kevin Banks spent twenty-five years as a unionized carpenter in Northern California. He made “pretty dang good money” working in construction, especially after his promotion to general foreman. But Kevin was badly injured on the job, and the timing of the injury coincided with the Great Recession. A white, native-born American who came from a union family, Kevin had never performed nonunion, low-wage work, but by 2009, his job choices were limited. With a trace of resigned shame in his voice, he disclosed in one of our conversations over coffee
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Beyond the AlgorithmQualitative Insights for Gig Work Regulation, pp. 33 - 56Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Acevedo, Deepa Das. “Unbundling Freedom in the Sharing Economy.” S. Cal. L. Rev. 91 (2017): 793.Google Scholar
Berg, Janine, and Johnston, Hannah. “Too Good to Be True? A Comment on Hall and Krueger’s Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber’s Driver-Partners.” ILR Review 72, no. 1 (2019): 39–68.Google Scholar
Berger, Thor, Frey, Carl Benedikt, Levin, Guy, and Danda, Santosh Rao. “Uber Happy? Work and Well-being in the ‘Gig Economy.’” Economic Policy (2018).Google Scholar
Buchanan-Oliver, Margo, and Cruz, Angela. “Discourses of Technology Consumption: Ambivalence, Fear, and Liminality.” ACR North American Advances (2011).Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, Dubal, V. B., and Carter, Christopher L.. “Disrupting Regulation, Regulating Disruption: The Politics of Uber in the United States.” Perspectives on Politics 16, no. 4 (2018): 919–937.Google Scholar
Conger, Kate, and Scheiber, Noam. “California Bill Makes App-Based Companies Treat Workers as Employees.” New York Times, Sept, 11, 2019. www.nytimes.com/2019/09/11/technology/california-gig-economy-bill.html.Google Scholar
“CA AB5 Law: Now We Need a Global Law for ‘Gig’ Workers.” Sept. 12, 2019. www.itfglobal.org/en/news/california-ab-5-law-now-we-need-global-law-gig-workers.Google Scholar
Conner, Mark, and Armitage, Christopher J.. “Attitudinal Ambivalence.” Attitudes and Attitude Change (2008): 261–286.Google Scholar
Craig, S., and Martinez, M., eds. Ambivalence, Politics and Public Policy. Springer, 2016.Google Scholar
Cunningham-Parmeter, Keith. “From Amazon to Uber: Defining Employment in the Modern Economy.” BUL Rev. 96 (2016): 1673–1728.Google Scholar
DeBruyne, Nicholas L. “Uber Drivers: A Disputed Employment Relationship in Light of the Sharing Economy.” Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 92 (2017): 289–315.Google Scholar
Dubal, V. B. “Wage Slave or Entrepreneur: Contesting the Dualism of Legal Worker Identities.” Calif. L. Rev. 105 (2017): 65–123.Google Scholar
Dubal, V. B. “Winning the Battle, Losing the War: Assessing the Impact of Misclassification Litigation on Workers in the Gig Economy.” Wis. L. Rev. (2017): 739–802.Google Scholar
Dubal, V. B. “The Drive to Precarity: A Political History of Work, Regulation, & Labor Advocacy in San Francisco’s Taxi & Uber Economics.” Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 38 (2017): 73–136.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Chaiken, Shelly. The Psychology of Attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
“Employer Costs for Employee Compensation.” Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Labor, June 2019. www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecec.pdf.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. “Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State.” Politics & Society 30, no. 2 (2002): 277–325.Google Scholar
Hall, Jonathan V., and Krueger, Alan B.. “An Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber’s Driver-Partners in the United States.” ILR Review 71, no. 3 (2018): 705–732.Google Scholar
Kaltner, Jillian. “Employment Status of Uber and Lyft Drivers: Unsettlingly Settled.” Hastings Women’s LJ 29 (2018): 29–54.Google Scholar
Paul, Sanjukta M. “The Enduring Ambiguities of Antitrust Liability for Worker Collective Action.” Loy. U. Chi. LJ 47 (2015): 969–1048.Google Scholar
Said, Carolyn. “Uber Circulates New Gig Bill as Alternative to AB5.” San Francisco Chronicle. Sept. 20, 2019. www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Uber-circulates-new-gig-work-bill-as-alternative-14426247.php.Google Scholar
Snyder, Benjamin H. The Disrupted Workplace: Time and the Moral Order of Flexible Capitalism. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Teamsters, Lyft Drivers to File Objections in Class Action Lawsuit Settlement, March 15, 2016. https://teamster.org/news/2016/03/teamsters-lyft-drivers-file-objections-class-action-lawsuit-settlement.Google Scholar
Tomassetti, Julia. “Who Is a Worker? Partisanship, the National Labor Relations Board, and the Social Content of Employment.” Law & Social Inquiry 37, no. 4 (2012): 815–847.Google Scholar
“Uber in Legal Battle Over Drivers’ Employment.” ABC 7 News, Aug. 6, 2015. https://abc7news.com/business/uber-in-legal-battle-over-drivers-employment/909341/.Google Scholar
West, Tony. “Uber: Drivers Tell Us Through Focus Groups and Surveys They Don’t Want to Be Employees.” USA Today, Sept. 16, 2019. www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/09/16/uber-drivers-tell-us-they-dont-want-employees-editorials-debates/2346851001/.Google Scholar
Zatz, Noah. “Beyond Misclassification: Tackling the Independent Contractor Problem without Redefining Employment.” ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law (2011): 279–294.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 11
- Cited by