Trust and Risk

doi:10.1017/9781108770880.008

Chapter 5 - Trust and Risk

Neuroeconomic Foundations of Trust Based on Social Risk

from Part II - Neuropsychological Level of Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 December 2021

Nina Lauharatanahirun and

Jason A. Aimone

Edited by

Frank Krueger

Show author details

Frank Krueger: Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Interpersonal trust decisions significantly shape our social interactions with others. At its basis, trust decisions can be thought of as an investment of resources in another that involve a degree of uncertainty as to whether such an investment made in a social exchange may be reciprocated or provide future benefits. In this chapter, interpersonal trust behavior is conceptualized as a microeconomic system and empirical support is presented for how interpersonal trust behavior can be thought of as a decision based on social risk. Decision makers face social risk when another person or group of people is the primary source of uncertainty. Arriving at the decision to trust another often involves psychological processes that occur at the cognitive, emotional, and social levels. Such psychological features are often dependent on the environment and institution surrounding the behavior and may give rise to differential preferences and beliefs such as betrayal aversion. We discuss how functional neuroimaging studies play a central role in disambiguating the contribution of such psychological factors to interpersonal trust behavior. We present key neuroeconomic studies that better our understanding of the neural mechanisms that underlie social risk decisions, and present open questions and future directions for research in this area.

Keywords

interpersonal trust social risk betrayal aversion risk trust fMRI

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Neurobiology of Trust , pp. 101 - 123

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770880.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abdellaoui, M., Baillon, A., Placido, L., & Wakker, P. P. (2011). The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. American Economic Review, 101(2), 695–723. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.2.695 Google Scholar

Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1998). The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature, 393(6684), 470–474. https://doi.org/10.1038/30982 Google Scholar

Aimone, J. A., & Houser, D. (2011). Beneficial betrayal aversion. PLoS ONE, 6(3), Article e17725. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017725 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Aimone, J. A., & Houser, D. (2012). What you don’t know won’t hurt you: A laboratory analysis of betrayal aversion. Experimental Economics, 15(4), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683–012-9314-z CrossRef Google Scholar

Aimone, J. A., & Houser, D. (2013). Harnessing the benefits of betrayal aversion. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 89, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.02.001 Google Scholar

Aimone, J. A., & Houser, D. (2016). Neuroeconomics: A flourishing field. In Komlos, J. & Kelly, I. R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economics and human biology. (pp. 649–666). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199389292.013.1 Google Scholar

Aimone, J. A., Houser, D., & Weber, B. (2014). Neural signatures of betrayal aversion: An fMRI study of trust. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1782), Article 20132127. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2127 Google Scholar

Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. (2002). Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70, 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00302 CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I., & Piankov, N. (2006). Decomposing trust and trustworthiness. Experimental Economics, 9(3), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683–006-9122-4 Google Scholar

Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single‐response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9(3), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090304 Google Scholar

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027 Google Scholar

Blais, A. R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/t13084–000 Google Scholar

Bohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2008). Betrayal aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. American Economic Review, 98(1), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.1.294 Google Scholar

Bohnet, I., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2010). Trust and the reference points for trustworthiness in Gulf and Western countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(2), 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.2.811 Google Scholar

Bohnet, I., & Zeckhauser, R. (2004). Trust, risk and betrayal. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.004 Google Scholar

Butler, J. V., & Miller, J. B. (2018). Social risk and the dimensionality of intentions. Management Science, 64(6), 2787–2796. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2694 Google Scholar

Christopoulos, G. I., Tobler, P. N., Bossaerts, P., Dolan, R. J., & Schultz, W. (2009). Neural correlates of value, risk, and risk aversion contributing to decision making under risk. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(40), 12574–12583. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2614-09.2009 Google Scholar

Coleman, J. (1990) Foundation of social theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(8), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn894 Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R., Grabowski, T. J., Bechara, A., et al. (2000). Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions. Nature Neuroscience, 3(10), 1049–1056. https://doi.org/10.1038/79871 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dunning, D., Anderson, J. E., Schlösser, T., Ehlebracht, D., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2014). Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect than expectation of reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036673 Google Scholar

Dunning, D., Fetchenhauer, D., & Schlösser, T. (2019). Why people trust: Solved puzzles and open mysteries. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838255 Google Scholar

Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1996.0081 CrossRef Google Scholar

Eckel, C. C., & Wilson, R. K. (2004). Is trust a risky decision? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.003 CrossRef Google Scholar

Effron, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2011). Reducing exposure to trust-related risks to avoid self-blame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210393532 Google Scholar

Elster, J. (2007) Explaining social behavior. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806421 Google Scholar

Engelmann, J. B., & Tamir, D. (2009). Individual differences in risk preference predict neural responses during financial decision making. Brain Research, 1290, 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.078 Google Scholar

Fairley, K., Sanfey, A., Vyrastekova, J., & Weitzel, U. (2016). Trust and risk revisited. Journal of Economic Psychology, 57, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.10.001 CrossRef Google Scholar

Fehr, E. (2009). On the economics and biology of trust. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2–3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.235 Google Scholar

Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.106228 CrossRef Google Scholar

Fetchenhauer, D., & Dunning, D. (2012). Betrayal aversion versus principled trustfulness: How to explain risk avoidance and risky choices in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(2), 534–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.07.017 CrossRef Google Scholar

Fetchenhauer, D., Lang, A. S., Ehlebracht, D., Schlösser, T., & Dunning, D. (2020). Does betrayal aversion really guide trust decisions towards strangers? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(4), 556–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2166 Google Scholar

Gambetta, D. (1988). Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gershoff, A. D., & Koehler, J. J. (2011). Safety first? The role of emotion in safety product betrayal aversion. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/658883 Google Scholar

Hardin, R. (2001) Conceptions and explanations of trust. In Cook, K. S. (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 3–39). Russell Sage Foundation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610441322.5 Google Scholar

Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Hardin, R. (2006). Trust. Polity Press.Google Scholar

Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024700 Google Scholar

Hong, K., & Bohnet, I. (2007). Status and distrust: The relevance of inequality and betrayal aversion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.06.003 Google Scholar

Houser, D., Schunk, D., & Winter, J. (2010). Distinguishing trust from risk: An anatomy of the investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74(1–2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.01.002 Google Scholar

Huettel, S. A., Stowe, C. J., Gordon, E. M., Warner, B. T., & Platt, M. L. (2006). Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity. Neuron, 49(5), 765–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.024 Google Scholar

Huster, R. J., Enriquez-Geppert, S., Lavallee, C. F., Falkenstein, M., & Herrmann, C. S. (2013). Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: Functional networks and cognitive contributions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87(3), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.001 Google Scholar

Jung, W. H., Lee, S., Lerman, C., & Kable, J. W. (2018). Amygdala functional and structural connectivity predicts individual risk tolerance. Neuron, 98(2), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.019 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kerr, N. L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.819 Google Scholar

Kim‐Spoon, J., Deater‐Deckard, K., Lauharatanahirun, N., et al. (2017). Neural interaction between risk sensitivity and cognitive control predicting health risk behaviors among late adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(3), 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12295 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kirsch, P., Esslinger, C., Chen, Q., et al. (2005). Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social cognition and fear in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(49), 11489–11493. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3984-05.2005 Google Scholar

Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Koehler, J. J., & Gershoff, A. D. (2003). Betrayal aversion: When agents of protection become agents of harm. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749–5978(02)00518-6 CrossRef Google Scholar

Koscik, T. R., & Tranel, D. (2011). The human amygdala is necessary for developing and expressing normal interpersonal trust. Neuropsychologia, 49(4), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.023 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435(7042), 673–676. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03701 Google Scholar

Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x CrossRef Google Scholar

Lauharatanahirun, N., Christopoulos, G. I., & King-Casas, B. (2012). Neural computations underlying social risk sensitivity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article 213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00213 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lauharatanahirun, N., Maciejewski, D., Holmes, C., Deater‐Deckard, K., Kim‐Spoon, J., & King‐Casas, B. (2018). Neural correlates of risk processing among adolescents: Influences of parental monitoring and household chaos. Child Development, 89(3), 784–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13036 Google Scholar

Menon, V., & Uddin, L. Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: A network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5–6), 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429–010-0262-0 Google Scholar

Mikolajczak, M., Gross, J. J., Lane, A., Corneille, O., de Timary, P., & Luminet, O. (2010). Oxytocin makes people trusting, not gullible. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1072–1074. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377343 Google Scholar

Mohr, P. N., Biele, G., & Heekeren, H. R. (2010). Neural processing of risk. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(19), 6613–6619. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0003-10.2010 Google Scholar

Nave, G., Camerer, C., & McCullough, M. (2015). Does oxytocin increase trust in humans? A critical review of research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 772–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615600138 Google Scholar

Quercia, S. (2016). Eliciting and measuring betrayal aversion using the BDM mechanism. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 2(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881–015-0021-3 Google Scholar

Rangel, A., Camerer, C., & Montague, P. R. (2008). A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(7), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2357 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617 Google Scholar

Sapienza, P., Toldra‐Simats, A., & Zingales, L. (2013). Understanding trust. The Economic Journal, 123(573), 1313–1332. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12036 Google Scholar

Schechter, L. (2007). Traditional trust measurement and the risk confound: An experiment in rural Paraguay. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 62(2), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.03.006 CrossRef Google Scholar

Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar

Simmons, A., Matthews, S. C., Stein, M. B., & Paulus, M. P. (2004). Anticipation of emotionally aversive visual stimuli activates right insula. Neuroreport, 15(14), 2261–2265. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200410050-00024 Google Scholar

Smith, V. L. (1982). Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. The American Economic Review, 72(5), 923–955. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1812014 Google Scholar

Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2015). Trust: An integrative review from a person–situation perspective. Review of General Psychology, 19(3), 249–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000046 Google Scholar

Tobler, P. N., O’Doherty, J. P., Dolan, R. J., & Schultz, W. (2007). Reward value coding distinct from risk attitude-related uncertainty coding in human reward systems. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97(2), 1621–1632. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00745.2006 Google Scholar

Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Chin, J. (2007). Feeling duped: Emotional, motivational, and cognitive aspects of being exploited by others. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.127 Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Jing, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, C., & Valadez, E. A. (2017). How dispositional social risk-seeking promotes trusting strangers: Evidence based on brain potentials and neural oscillations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(8), 1150–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000328 Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. The Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1, Part 2), 453–486. https://doi.org/10.1086/467284 Google Scholar

Yamagishi, T. (2011). Trust: The evolutionary game of mind and society. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53936-0 CrossRef Google Scholar

Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 931–959. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.931 Google Scholar

Zuckerman, M., Kolin, E. A., Price, L., & Zoob, I. (1964). Development of a sensation-seeking scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28(6), 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040995 Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.