Psychology of Democracy

doi:10.1017/9781108774871.002

Chapter 1 - Psychology of Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2022

Ashley Weinberg

Edited by

Ashley Weinberg

Show author details

Ashley Weinberg: Affiliation:
University of Salford

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Democracy is under attack. Whether from those within its systems who seek to gain at the expense of others, or from without by rival forms of rule. Yet the crises we face as a species demand not only that we recognise the perils of a changing planet, but that we address them together. Democracy may imply an imperfect form of government, but its purported advantages lie in seeking to give voice to all people, political parties and perspectives, in hopes that the common good is served and citizens not only represented, but respected. The challenge of a pandemic, finding nations divided in their responses, underlines the pressing need for a genuine understanding of what democracy can and does deliver. This necessitates a clearer focus on our own roles as citizens – and thereby politicians in our daily lives – and on occupational politicians, as well as the political institutions and influences that shape our experiences of democracy. In opening ‘Psychology of Democracy: Of the people, by the people, for the people’, the editor points to the power of harnessing multidisciplinary and cutting-edge knowledge from psychology, political and allied social sciences. The opening chapter maps out the design and potential impact of the book, examining the psychology ‘of the people’ who are elected, the political institutions and processes created ‘by the people’ and the influences from broader societies that shape the context of democracy ‘for the people’. Its message is clear: the future is ours if we can better harness all human talents.

Keywords

Democracy psychology political science citizens politicians crisis political institutions

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Psychology of Democracy
Of the People, By the People, For the People
, pp. 1 - 22

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108774871.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Lord, Acton. Lord Acton to Archbishop Mandell Creighton, 5 April 1887. Accessed at: https://oll.libertyfund.org/quote/lord-acton-writes-to-bishop-creighton-that-the-same-moral-standards-should-be-applied-to-all-men-political-and-religious-leaders-included-especially-since-power-tends-to-corrupt-and-absolute-power-corrupts-absolutely-1887.Google Scholar

Bader Ginsburg, R. (2014). Interview. The New Republic, 28 September.Google Scholar

Bagehot, W. (1873). The English constitution, 2nd Edition. London: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bronowski, J. (1973). The ascent of man. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar

Byock, J. (2002). The Icelandic Althing: Dawn of parliamentary democracy. In Fladmark, J. M. (Ed.), Heritage and identity: Shaping the nations of the north (pp 1–18). The Heyerdahl Institute and Robert Gordon University. Donhead St. Mary, Shaftesbury: Donhead. Available at: www.viking.ucla.edu/publications/articles/icelandic_allthing.pdf Google Scholar

Clarke, N., Jennings, W., Moss, J. and Stoker, G. (2016). The rise of anti-politics in Britain. Southampton: University of Southampton.Google Scholar

Conover, P. J., Searing, D. D. and Crewe, I. M. (2002). The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 21–62.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dommett, K. and Temple, L. (2018). Digital campaigning: The rise of Facebook and satellite campaigns. Parliamentary Affairs, 71(1), 189–202. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx056 CrossRef Google Scholar

Flinders, M. (2016). The problem with democracy. Parliamentary Affairs, 69, 181–203.CrossRef Google Scholar

Foa, R. S., Klassen, A., Slade, M., Rand, A. and Collins, R. (2020). The global satisfaction with democracy report 2020. Cambridge, UK: Centre for the Future of Democracy.Google Scholar

Gervais, B. T. (2019). Rousing the partisan combatant: Elite incivility, anger and anti-deliberative attitudes. Political Psychology, 40, 637–655.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hansard Society (2019). Audit of political engagement: The 2019 report. Available at: www.hansardsociety.org.uk/publications/reports/audit-of-political-engagement-16 Google Scholar

Hett, C. H. (2018). The death of democracy: Hitler’s rise to power. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.Google Scholar

Huddy, L., Mason, L. and AarØe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

International Organization for Migration (United Nations) (2020). World migration report 2020. Accessed at: www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/wmr_2020.pdf Google Scholar

Jefferson, T. (1787). Jefferson’s preference for ‘newspapers without government’ over ‘government without newspapers’. Available at: https://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/302 Google Scholar

Kothari, R. (2012). Interview with Rajni Kothari, Founder-Director, Centre for the Study of Developing Societies by Hilal Ahmed, Priyadarshini Vijaisri and Abhay Kumar Dubey, CSDS, Delhi. Available at: www.india-seminar.com/2012/639/639_interview_kothari.htm Google Scholar

Lührmann, A. and Lindberg, S. I. (2019). A third wave of autocratization is here: What is new about it? Democratization, 26(7), 1095–1113. doi:10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029CrossRef Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1859/1983). On liberty (Reprinted). Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar

Moghaddam, F. (2018). The road to actualized democracy: A psychological explanation. Niels Bohr Lecture in Cultural Psychology, Aalborg University. Available at: www.ccp.aau.dk/digitalAssets/150/150776_niels-bohr-lecture-road-to-actualized-democracy.pdf Google Scholar

Moghaddam, F. (2016). The psychology of democracy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.Google Scholar

National Archives (n.d.) Thomas Paine’s Rights of Man. www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/citizenship/struggle_democracy/docs/rights_man.htm Accessed 30 April 2020.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (2015). Political emotions: Why love matters for justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Stoker, G. and Evans, M. (Eds.) (2016). Evidence-based policy making in the social sciences: Methods that matter. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar

The Economist (2018). The death of democracy and birth of an unknown beast; interview with David Runciman, 13 September. Available at: www.economist.com/open-future/2018/09/13/the-death-of-democracy-and-birth-of-an-unknown-beast Google Scholar

The Sunday Times (2020). The Sunday Times rich list. 17 May.Google Scholar

van Prooijen, J. W. and van Lange, P. A. M. (2014). Power, politics and paranoia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Weinberg, A. (Ed.) (2012). The psychology of politicians. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.