Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:00:16.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Contemporary Challenges to Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2022

Danny Osborne
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Chris G. Sibley
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2017). World inequality report 2018. wir2018.wid.worldGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 244263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B., & Leigh, A. (2007). The distribution of top incomes in Australia. Economic Record, 83(262), 247261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2007.00412.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2011). Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(1), 371. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.1.3Google Scholar
Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., Rothmund, T., & Sterling, J. (2019). Neoliberal ideology and the justification of inequality in capitalist societies: Why social and economic dimensions of ideology are intertwined. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 4988. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahamondes, J., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2019). ‘We look (and feel) better through system justifying lenses’: Evidence of the palliative function of ideology among the disadvantaged. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(9), 13911408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219829178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahamondes, J., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2021). System justification and perceptions of group-based discrimination: Investigating the temporal order of the ideologically motivated minimization (or exaggeration) of discrimination across low- and high-status groups. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620929452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahamondes-Correa, J. (2016). System justification’s opposite effects on psychological wellbeing: Testing a moderated mediation model in a gay men and lesbian sample in Chile. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(11), 15371555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1223351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartle, J., Birch, S., & Skirmuntt, M. (2017). The local roots of the participation gap: Inequality and voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 48, 3044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, J. C. (2020). Ideology and the promotion of social change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.005Google Scholar
Becker, J. C., Hartwich, L., & Haslam, S. A. (2021). Neoliberalism can reduce well-being by promoting a sense of social disconnection, competition, and loneliness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(3), 947965. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12438CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Belief in a just world and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 699746. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, C. J., Brown, G. D. A., & Moore, S. C. (2010). Money and happiness: Rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 21(4), 471475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610362671Google Scholar
Breznau, N., & Hommerich, C. (2019). No generalizable effect of income inequality on public support for governmental redistribution among rich democracies 1987–2010. Social Science Research, 81, 170191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.03.013Google Scholar
Burns, J. K., & Esterhuizen, T. (2008). Poverty, inequality and the treated incidence of first-episode psychosis: An ecological study from South Africa. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 43(4), 331335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-008-0308-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burns, J. K., Tomita, A., & Kapadia, A. S. (2014). Income inequality and schizophrenia: Increased schizophrenia incidence in countries with high levels of income inequality. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 60(2), 185196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764013481426CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020, 12 June). Age-adjusted COVID-19-associated hospitalization rates by race and ethnicity: COVID-NET, March 1–June 6, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/images/age-adjusted-1200x675-anim-06152020.gifGoogle Scholar
Chetty, R., Grusky, D., Hell, M., Hendren, N., Manduca, R., & Narang, J. (2017). The fading American dream: Trends in absolute income mobility since 1940. Science, 356(6336), 398406. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4617Google Scholar
Cheung, F. (2016). Can income inequality be associated with positive outcomes? Hope mediates the positive inequality–happiness link in rural China. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(4), 320330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615619762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choe, J. (2008). Income inequality and crime in the United States. Economics Letters, 101(1), 3133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2008.03.025Google Scholar
Coccia, M. (2018). Economic inequality can generate unhappiness that leads to violent crime in society. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 4(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijhd.2018.090488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S., Alper, C. M., Doyle, W. J., Adler, N. E., Treanor, J. J., & Turner, R. B. (2008). Objective and subjective socioeconomic status and susceptibility to the common cold. Health Psychology, 27(2), 268274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.2.268Google Scholar
Dewan, P., Rørth, R., Jhund, P. S., et al. (2019). Income inequality and outcomes in heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Heart Failure, 7(4), 336346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2018.11.005Google Scholar
Figueiredo, F. W. d. S., & Adami, F. (2018). Income inequality and mortality owing to breast cancer: Evidence from Brazil. Clinical Breast Cancer, 18(4), e651e658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2017.11.005Google Scholar
García-Sánchez, E., Osborne, D., Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2020). Attitudes toward redistribution and the interplay between perceptions and beliefs about inequality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(1), 111136. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12326Google Scholar
Gilens, M. (2005). Inequality and democratic responsiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(5), 778796. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi058Google Scholar
Gimpelson, V., & Treisman, D. (2015). Misperceiving inequality. National Bureau of Economic Research (w21174). https://doi.org/10.3386/w21174Google Scholar
Gini, C. (1912). Variabilità e mutabilità: Contributo allo studio delle distribuzioni e delle relazioni statistiche. Tipografia paolo Cuppini.Google Scholar
Greitemeyer, T., & Sagioglou, C. (2016). Subjective socioeconomic status causes aggression: A test of the theory of social deprivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(2), 178194. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000058Google Scholar
Hoover, E. M. Jr. (1936). The measurement of industrial localization. The Review of Economic Statistics, 18(4), 162171. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927875Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (2016). Inequality and modernization: Why equality is likely to make a comeback. Foreign Affairs, 95(1), 210. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43946619Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2017). Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: The silent revolution in reverse. Perspectives on Politics, 15(2), 443454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717000111Google Scholar
Jay, S., Batruch, A., Jetten, J., McGarty, C., & Muldoon, O. T. (2019). Economic inequality and the rise of far-right populism: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 418428. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jetten, J., Wang, Z., Steffens, N. K., Mols, F., Peters, K., & Verkuyten, M. (2017). A social identity analysis of responses to economic inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.011Google Scholar
Johnson, S. L., Wibbels, E., & Wilkinson, R. (2015). Economic inequality is related to cross-national prevalence of psychotic symptoms. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50(12), 17991807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-015-1112-4Google Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2020). A theory of system justification. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674247192Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Becker, J. C., Osborne, D., & Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 99108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417690633Google Scholar
Kaplan, G. A., Pamuk, E. R., Lynch, J. W., Cohen, R. D., & Balfour, J. L. (1996). Inequality in income and mortality in the United States: Analysis of mortality and potential pathways. British Medical Journal, 312, 9991003. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7037.999Google Scholar
Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (1997). The relationship of income inequality to mortality: Does the choice of indicator matter? Social Science & Medicine, 45(7), 11211127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00044-0Google Scholar
Kelly, N. J., & Enns, P. K. (2010). Inequality and the dynamics of public opinion: The self-reinforcing link between economic inequality and mass preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 54(4), 855870. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00472.xGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, B. P., Kawachi, I., & Prothrow-Stith, D. (1996). Income distribution and mortality: Cross sectional ecological study of the Robin Hood index in the United States. British Medical Journal, 312(7037), 10041007. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7037.1004Google Scholar
Kennedy, B. P., Kawachi, I., Prothrow-Stith, D., Lochner, K., & Gupta, V. (1998). Social capital, income inequality, and firearm violent crime. Social Science & Medicine, 47(1), 717. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00097-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiatpongsan, S., & Norton, M. I. (2014). How much (more) should CEOs make? A universal desire for more equal pay. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 587593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614549773Google Scholar
Killewald, A., Pfeffer, F. T., & Schachner, J. N. (2017). Wealth inequality and accumulation. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 379404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053331Google Scholar
Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. Aldine De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351329002Google Scholar
Kondo, N., Sembajwe, G., Kawachi, I., van Dam, R. M., Subramanian, S. V., & Yamagata, Z. (2009). Income inequality, mortality, and self rated health: Meta-analysis of multilevel studies. British Medical Journal, 339, Article b4471. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4471Google Scholar
Kteily, N. S., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., & Ho, A. K. (2017). Hierarchy in the eye of the beholder: (Anti-)Egalitarianism shapes perceived levels of social inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 136159. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000097CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lancee, B., & van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2012). Income inequality and participation: A comparison of 24 European countries. Social Science Research, 41(5), 11661178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.04.005Google Scholar
Lorenz, M. O. (1905). Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publications of the American Statistical Association, 9(70), 209219. https://doi.org/10.2307/2276207Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914927. https://doi.org/10.1086/261013Google Scholar
Mijs, J. J. B. (2020, 27 April). 5 lessons from the coronavirus about inequality in America. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/5-lessons-from-the-coronavirus-about-inequality-in-america-136024Google Scholar
Mijs, J. J. B. (2021). The paradox of inequality: Income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand. Socio-Economic Review, 19(1), 735. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy051Google Scholar
Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2011). Building a better America – One wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 912. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norton, M. I., Neal, D. T., Govan, C. L., Ariely, D., & Holland, E. (2014). The not-so-common-wealth of Australia: Evidence for a cross-cultural desire for a more equal distribution of wealth. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14(1), 339351. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12058Google Scholar
Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22(9), 10951100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417262Google Scholar
Osborne, D., García-Sánchez, E., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). Identifying the psychological mechanisms underlying the effects of inequality on society: The Macro-micro model of Inequality and RElative Deprivation (MIRED). In Jetten, J. & Peters, K. (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 249266). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, D., Jost, J. T., Becker, J. C., Badaan, V., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). Protesting to challenge or defend the system? A system justification perspective on collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 244269. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2522Google Scholar
Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). Through rose-colored glasses: System-justifying beliefs dampen the effects of relative deprivation on well-being and political mobilization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(8), 9911004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213487997Google Scholar
Osborne, D., Sibley, C. G., & Sengupta, N. K. (2015). Income and neighbourhood-level inequality predict self-esteem and ethnic identity centrality through individual- and group-based relative deprivation: A multilevel path analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 368377. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2087Google Scholar
Pabayo, R., Kawachi, I., & Gilman, S. E. (2014). Income inequality among American states and the incidence of major depression. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 68(2), 110115. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2013-203093Google Scholar
Patel, V., Burns, J. K., Dhingra, M., Tarver, L., Kohrt, B. A., & Lund, C. (2018). Income inequality and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and a scoping review of mechanisms. World Psychiatry, 17(1), 7689. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20492Google Scholar
Payne, B. K., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Hannay, J. W. (2017). Economic inequality increases risk taking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(18), 46434648. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616453114Google Scholar
Petkanopoulou, K., Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., Willis, G. B., Chryssochoou, X., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2018). Two countries in crisis: Economic inequality in the EU and disidentification with Europe in Spain and Greece. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(6), 888906. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117751201Google Scholar
Phillips, L. T., & Lowery, B. S. (2020). I ain’t no fortunate one: On the motivated denial of class privilege. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 14031422. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000240Google Scholar
Pickett, K. E., Kelly, S., Brunner, E., Lobstein, T., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2005). Wider income gaps, wider waistbands? An ecological study of obesity and income inequality. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(8), 670674. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.028795Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (Goldhammer, A., Trans.). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and ideology (Goldhammer, A., Trans.; 1st ed.). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2014). Inequality in the long run. Science, 344(6186), 838843. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251936Google Scholar
Plato, . (360 BC/1970). The laws (Saunders, T. J., Trans.). Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Ransome, Y., Kawachi, I., Braunstein, S., & Nash, D. (2016). Structural inequalities drive late HIV diagnosis: The role of black racial concentration, income inequality, socioeconomic deprivation, and HIV testing. Health & Place, 42, 148158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.09.004Google Scholar
Ribeiro, W. S., Bauer, A., Andrade, M. C. R., et al. (2017). Income inequality and mental illness-related morbidity and resilience: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 4(7), 554562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30159-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roithmayr, D. (2014). Reproducing racism: How everyday choices lock in White advantage. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Roser, M., & Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2016). Income inequality. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/Google Scholar
Roth, B., Hahn, E., & Spinath, F. M. (2017). Income inequality, life satisfaction, and economic worries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(2), 133141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616664955Google Scholar
Rueda, D., & Stegmueller, D. (2016). The externalities of inequality: Fear of crime and preferences for redistribution in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 60(2), 472489. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12212Google Scholar
Rushe, D., Aratani, L., & Holpuch, A. (2020, 14 May). 36m Americans now unemployed as another 3m file for benefits. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/may/14/unemployment-us-data-coronavirusGoogle Scholar
Saez, E. (2019). Striking it richer: The evolution of top incomes in the United States (updated with 2017 final estimates). [Working paper]. University of California, Berkeley. https://eml.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sainz, M., Loughnan, S., Martínez, R., Moya, M., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2020). Dehumanization of socioeconomically disadvantaged groups decreases support for welfare policies via perceived wastefulness. International Review of Social Psychology, 33(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.414Google Scholar
Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., Jetten, J., Sánchez, W., Byrd, G., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. M. (2019). High economic inequality makes us feel less wealthy. International Review of Social Psychology, 32(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.333Google Scholar
Sánchez‐Rodríguez, Á., Willis, G. B., Jetten, J., & Rodríguez‐Bailón, R. (2019). Economic inequality enhances inferences that the normative climate is individualistic and competitive. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(6), 11141127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2557Google Scholar
Schäfer, A. (2012). Consequences of social inequality for democracy in Western Europe. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 6(2), 2345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-010-0086-6Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. (2018). The great leveler: Violence and the history of inequality from the stone age to the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/9780691184319Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. A. (2017). Long-term physical health consequences of perceived inequality: Results from a twin comparison design. Social Science & Medicine, 187, 184192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.006Google Scholar
Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430825Google Scholar
Solt, F. (2008). Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 4860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.xGoogle Scholar
Solt, F. (2010). Does economic inequality depress electoral participation? Testing the Schattschneider hypothesis. Political Behavior, 32(2), 285301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9106-0Google Scholar
Solt, F. (2012). The social origins of authoritarianism. Political Research Quarterly, 65(4), 703713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911424287Google Scholar
Sommet, N., Elliot, A. J., Jamieson, J. P., & Butera, F. (2019). Income inequality, perceived competitiveness, and approach‐avoidance motivation. Journal of Personality, 87(4), 767784. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12432Google Scholar
Soobader, M.-J., & LeClere, F. B. (1999). Aggregation and the measurement of income inequality: Effects on morbidity. Social Science & Medicine, 48(6), 733744. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00401-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprong, S., Jetten, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2019). ‘Our country needs a strong leader right now’: Economic inequality enhances the wish for a strong leader. Psychological Science, 30(11), 16251637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619875472Google Scholar
Starmans, C., Sheskin, M., & Bloom, P. (2017). Why people prefer unequal societies. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(4), Article 0082. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0082Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 3347). Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
The Guardian. (2020a, 25 May). The Guardian view on Europe and COVID-19: Time for true solidarity. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/may/25/the-guardian-view-on-europe-and-covid-19-time-for-true-solidarityGoogle Scholar
The Guardian. (2020b, 27 May). More than 100,000 Americans have died from COVID-19: Here is that tragic story in figures. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/27/us-coronavirus-deaths-pass-100000-statisticsGoogle Scholar
Theil, H. (1967). Economics and information theory. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Trump, K.-S. (2018). Income inequality influences perceptions of legitimate income differences. British Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 929952. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varaine, S. (2018). Bad times are not good times for revolutions: Collective deprivation and the mobilization level of French radical movements (1882–1980). Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 28(4), 258271. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2356Google Scholar
Walasek, L., & Brown, G. D. A. (2015). Income inequality and status seeking: Searching for positional goods in unequal U.S. states. Psychological Science, 26(4), 527533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567511Google Scholar
Weiner, B., Osborne, D., & Rudolph, U. (2011). An attributional analysis of reactions to poverty: The political ideology of the giver and the perceived morality of the receiver. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 199213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310387615CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2006). Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence. Social Science & Medicine, 62(7), 17681784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.036Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2010). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019Google Scholar
Xie, Y., & Zhou, X. (2014). Income inequality in today’s China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(19), 69286933. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1403158111Google Scholar
Yancy, C. W. (2020). COVID-19 and African Americans. Journal of the American Medical Association, 323(19), 18911892. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6548Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., & Awaworyi Churchill, S. (2020). Income inequality and subjective wellbeing: Panel data evidence from China. China Economic Review, 60, Article 101392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101392CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Abrams, M., & Rose, R. (1960). Must labour lose? Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Abramson, P. R., & Aldrich, J. H. (1982). The decline of electoral participation in America. The American Political Science Review, 76(3), 502521. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963728Google Scholar
Achterberg, P., & Houtman, D. (2006). Why do so many people vote ‘unnaturally’? A cultural explanation for voting behaviour. European Journal of Political Research, 45(1), 7592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00291.xGoogle Scholar
Ares, M. (2020). Changing classes, changing preferences: How social class mobility affects economic preferences. West European Politics, 43(6), 12111237. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3401196Google Scholar
Argyle, M. (1994). The psychology of social class. Routledge.Google Scholar
Arndt, C. (2013). The electoral consequences of third way welfare state reforms: Social democracy’s transformation and its political cost. Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048517213Google Scholar
Arzheimer, K. (2016). Electoral sociology: Who votes for the extreme right and why – and when? In Mudde, C. (Ed.), The populist radical right: A reader (pp. 277289). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666369223.35Google Scholar
Azzolini, L., & Evans, G. (2020). How party ideological convergence accentuates class differences in voter turnout: The role of age and values. Nuffield Elections Unit, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. M. (2016). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400883363Google Scholar
Bengtsson, M., Berglund, T., & Oskarson, M. (2013). Class and ideological orientations revisited: An exploration of class-based mechanisms. British Journal of Sociology, 64(4), 691716. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12033Google Scholar
Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bornschier, S., & Kriesi, H. (2012). The populist right, the working class, and the changing face of class politics. In Rydgren, J. (Ed.), Class politics and the radical right (pp. 1030). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203079546-7Google Scholar
Brooks, C., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Manza, J. (2006). Cleavage-based voting behavior in cross-national perspective: Evidence from six postwar democracies. Social Science Research, 35(1), 88128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.06.005Google Scholar
Brooks, C., & Svallfors, S. (2010). Why does class matter? Policy attitudes, mechanisms, and the case of the Nordic countries. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 28(2), 199213.Google Scholar
Bukodi, E., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2019). Social mobility and education in Britain: Research, politics and policy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108567404Google Scholar
Butler, D., & Stokes, D. (1974). Political change in Britain: The evolution of electoral choice. MacMillan.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Converse, P. (1958). The shifting role of class in political attitudes and behaviour. In Maccoby, E. E., Newcomb, T. M., & Hartley, E. L. (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 388399). Holt.Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. E. (Ed.), Ideology and its discontents (pp. 164193). Free Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, J., & Andersen, R. (2015). How social class shapes attitudes on economic inequality: The competing forces of self-interest and legitimation. International Review of Social Research, 5(1), 419. https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2015-0002Google Scholar
Dalton, R. (2008). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (Vol. 5). Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
De Botton, A. (2008). Status anxiety. Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Dekker, P., & Ester, P. (1987). Working‐class authoritarianism: A re‐examination of the Lipset thesis. European Journal of Political Research, 15(4), 395415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1987.tb00884.xGoogle Scholar
Elff, M. (2009). Social divisions, party positions, and electoral behaviour. Electoral Studies, 28(2), 297308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2009.02.002Google Scholar
Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/72.3.909Google Scholar
Eulau, H. (1956a). Identification with class and political perspective. The Journal of Politics, 18(2), 232253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2126983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eulau, H. (1956b). Identification with class and political role behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 20(3), 515529. https://doi.org/10.1086/266652Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1992). Testing the validity of the Goldthorpe class schema. European Sociological Review, 8(3), 211232. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036638Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1993). Class, prospects and the life-cycle: Explaining the association between class position and political preferences. Acta Sociologica, 36(3), 263276. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939303600308Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1999). The end of class politics? Class voting in comparative context. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198296347.001.0001Google Scholar
Evans, G. (2000). The continued significance of class voting. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 401417. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.401Google Scholar
Evans, G. (2006). The social bases of political divisions in post-communist Eastern Europe. Annual Review of Sociology, 32(1), 245270. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123144Google Scholar
Evans, G., & De Graaf, N. D. (2013). Political choice matters: Explaining the strength of class and religious cleavages in cross-national perspective. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199663996.001.0001Google Scholar
Evans, G., Heath, A., & Lalljee, M. (1996). Measuring left-right and libertarian-authoritarian values in the British electorate. British Journal of Sociology, 93–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/591118Google Scholar
Evans, G., & Mellon, J. (2016). Social class: Identity, awareness and political attitudes: Why are we still working class? British Social Attitudes, 33.Google Scholar
Evans, G., & Mills, C. (1998). A latent class analysis of the criterion-related and construct validity of the Goldthorpe class schema. European Sociological Review, 14(1), 87106. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018229Google Scholar
Evans, G., & Neundorf, A. (2018). Core political values and the long-term shaping of partisanship. British Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 119. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123418000339Google Scholar
Evans, G., & Tilley, J. (2012a). The depoliticization of inequality and redistribution: Explaining the decline of class voting. The Journal of Politics, 74(4), 963976. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381612000618Google Scholar
Evans, G., & Tilley, J. (2012b). How parties shape class politics: Explaining the decline of the class basis of party support. British Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 137161. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123411000202Google Scholar
Evans, G., & Tilley, J. (2017). The new politics of class in Britain: The political exclusion of the working class. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755753.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G., & Hall, P. A. (2019). Representation gaps: Changes in popular preferences and party positions over the long term in the developed democracies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Evans, M. D., & Kelley, J. (2004). Subjective social location: Data from 21 nations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(1), 338.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24(1), 4174. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00316Google Scholar
Feldman, S., & Stenner, K. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18(4), 741770. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00077Google Scholar
Franklin, M. (1992). The decline of cleavage politics. In Franklin, M. N., Mackie, T., & Valen, H. (Eds.), Electoral change: Responses to evolving social and attitudinal structures in western countries (pp. 383405). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gest, J. (2016). The new minority: White working class politics in an age of immigration and inequality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gidron, N. (2020). Many ways to be right: Cross-pressured voters in Western Europe. British Journal of Political Science, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123420000228Google Scholar
Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A. (2017). The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. British Journal of Sociology, 68(Suppl. 1), S57S84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12319Google Scholar
Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A. (2020). Populism as a problem of social integration. Comparative Political Studies, 53(7), 10271059. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041401987994Google Scholar
Gidron, N., & Mijs, J. J. (2019). Do changes in material circumstances drive support for populist radical parties? Panel data evidence from The Netherlands during the Great Recession, 2007–2015. European Sociological Review, 35(5), 637650. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz023Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). On sociology (Vol. 2, 2nd ed.). Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H., & McKnight, A. (2006). The economic basis of social class. In Morgan, S. L., Grusky, D. B., & Fields, G. S. (Eds.), Mobility and inequality: Frontiers of research in sociology and economics (pp. 109136). Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Grabb, E. G. (1979). Working-class authoritarianism and tolerance of outgroups: A reassessment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43(1), 3647.Google Scholar
Güveli, A., Need, A., & De Graaf, N. D. (2007). The rise of new social classes within the service class in the Netherlands: Political orientation of social and cultural specialists and technocrats between 1970 and 2003. Acta Sociologica, 50(2), 129146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699307077655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häusermann, S., & Kriesi, H. (2015). What do voters want? Dimensions and configurations in individual-level preferences and party choice. In Beramendi, P., Häusermann, S., Kitschelt, H., & Kriesi, H. (Eds.), The politics of advanced capitalism (pp. 202230). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316163245.009Google Scholar
Heath, A., Evans, G., & Martin, J. (1994). The measurement of core beliefs and values: The development of balanced socialist/laissez faire and libertarian/authoritarian scales. British Journal of Political Science, 24(1), 115132. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400006815Google Scholar
Heath, A. F., Jowell, R., & Curtice, J. (1985). How Britain votes. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Heath, O. (2018). Policy alienation, social alienation and working-class abstention in Britain, 1964–2010. British Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 10531073. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123416000272Google Scholar
Himmelweit, H. T., Humphreys, P., & Jaeger, M. (1985). How voters decide: A model of vote choice based on a special longitudinal study extending over fifteen years and the British Election Surveys of 1970–1983. Open University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/590754Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., & Rabier, J. R. (1986). Political realignment in advanced industrial society: From class‐based politics to quality‐of‐life politics. Government and Opposition, 21(4), 456479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1986.tb00032.xGoogle Scholar
Ivarsflaten, E. (2005). The vulnerable populist right parties: No economic realignment fuelling their electoral success. European Journal of Political Research, 44(3), 465492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00235.xGoogle Scholar
Jackman, M. R., & Jackman, R. W. (1973). An interpretation of the relation between objective and subjective social status. American Sociological Review, 38(5), 569582. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094408Google Scholar
Jackman, M. R., & Jackman, R. W. (1983). Class awareness in the United States. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520311558Google Scholar
Jansen, G. (2019). Self-employment as atypical or autonomous work: Diverging effects on political orientations. Socio-Economic Review, 17(2), 381407. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww017Google Scholar
Jansen, G., Evans, G., & De Graaf, N. D. (2013). Class voting and left–right party positions: A comparative study of 15 Western democracies, 1960–2005. Social Science Research, 42(2), 376400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.007Google Scholar
Kelley, J., & Evans, M. D. (1995). Class and class conflict in six western nations. American Sociological Review, 60(2), 157178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096382Google Scholar
Kikkawa, T. (2000). Changes in the determinants of class identification in Japan. International Journal of Sociology, 30(2), 3451. https://doi.org/10.1080/15579336.2000.11770214Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H., & McGann, A. J. (1997). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14501Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H., & Rehm, P. (2014). Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies, 47(12), 16701706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013516066Google Scholar
Knutsen, O. (2017). Social structure, value orientations and party choice in Western Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52123-7Google Scholar
Kohn, M. (1989). Class and conformity: A study in values. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, M. L., Naoi, A., Schoenbach, C., Schooler, C., & Slomczynski, K. M. (1990). Position in the class structure and psychological functioning in the United States, Japan, and Poland. American Journal of Sociology, 95(4), 9641008. https://doi.org/10.1086/229382Google Scholar
Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1983). Work and personality: An inquiry into the impact of social stratification. Ablex.Google Scholar
Kurer, T. (2020). The declining middle: Occupational change, social status, and the populist right. Comparative Political Studies, 53(10–11), 17981835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020912283Google Scholar
Lamont, M. (2000). The dignity of working men: Morality and the boundaries of race, class, and immigration. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk12rptGoogle Scholar
Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167195. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107Google Scholar
Langsæther, P. E. (2019). Class voting and the differential role of political values: Evidence from 12 West-European countries. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 29(1), 125142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1464015Google Scholar
Langsæther, P. E., & Evans, G. (2020). More than self‐interest: Why different classes have different attitudes to income inequality. British Journal of Sociology, 71(4), 594607. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12747Google Scholar
Langsæther, P. E., Evans, G., & O’Grady, T. (2020). Explaining the relationship between class position and political preferences. British Journal of Political Science, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000599Google Scholar
Leighley, J. E., & Nagler, J. (1992). Socioeconomic class bias in turnout, 1964–1988: The voters remain the same. The American Political Science Review, 86(3), 725736. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964134Google Scholar
Leighley, J. E., & Nagler, J. (2007). Unions, voter turnout, and class bias in the US electorate, 1964–2004. The Journal of Politics, 69(2), 430441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00541.xGoogle Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Democracy and working-class authoritarianism. American Sociological Review, 24, 482501. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089536Google Scholar
Manza, J., & Crowley, N. (2018). Class divisions and political attitudes in the 21st century. In Albarracin, D. & Johnson, B. T. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes, Vol. 2: Applications (pp. 367397). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199545636.003.0034Google Scholar
Manza, J., Hout, M., & Brooks, C. (1995). Class voting in capitalist democracies since World War II: Dealignment, realignment, or trendless fluctuation? Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 137162. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.001033Google Scholar
McGann, A. J., & Kitschelt, H. (2005). The radical right in the Alps: Evolution of support for the Swiss SVP and Austrian FPÖ. Party Politics, 11(2), 147171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068805049734Google Scholar
Morgan, S. L. (2018). Status threat, material interests, and the 2016 presidential vote. Socius, 4, 117. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118788217Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511492037Google Scholar
Mutz, D. C. (2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), E4330E4339. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718155115Google Scholar
Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). The ‘antidemocratic personality’ revisited: A cross‐national investigation of working‐class authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 64(3), 595617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00579.xGoogle Scholar
Nieuwbeerta, P. (1995). The democratic class struggle in twenty countries 1945–1990. Acta Sociologica, 39(4), 345383. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939603900401Google Scholar
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595841Google Scholar
Oesch, D. (2006). Redrawing the class map: Stratification and institutions in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504592Google Scholar
Oesch, D., & Rennwald, L. (2018). Electoral competition in Europe’s new tripolar political space: Class voting for the left, centre-right and radical right. European Journal of Political Research, 57(4), 783807. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12259Google Scholar
Oesch, D., & Vigna, N. (2020). A decline in the social status of the working class? Conflicting evidence for 8 Western countries, 1987–2017. LIVES Working Papers, Swiss Centre for Expertise in Life Course Research.Google Scholar
Oskarson, M. (2005). Social structure and party choice. In Thomassen, J. (Ed.), The European voter: A comparative study of modern democracies (pp. 84105). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199273219.003.0004Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. (2017). Social psychological perspectives on Trump supporters. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(1), 107116. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i1.750Google Scholar
Prysby, C. L. (1977). Psychological sources of working-class support for leftist political parties. The Journal of Politics, 39(4), 10731081. https://doi.org/10.2307/2129945Google Scholar
Rennwald, L., & Evans, G. (2014). When supply creates demand: Social democratic party strategies and the evolution of class voting. West European Politics, 37(5), 11081135. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.920981Google Scholar
Richards, L., Heath, A., & Carl, N. (2020). Not just ‘the left behind’? Exploring the effects of subjective social status on Brexit-related preferences. Contemporary Social Science, 16(3), 116. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2020.1847312Google Scholar
Ridgeway, C. L. (2014). Why status matters for inequality. American Sociological Review, 79(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413515997Google Scholar
Robertson, D. (1984). Class and the British electorate. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. V., & Kelley, J. (1979). Class as conceived by Marx and Dahrendorf: Effects on income inequality and politics in the United States and Great Britain. American Sociological Review, 44, 3858. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094817Google Scholar
Rose, D., & Harrison, E. (2010). Social class in Europe: An introduction to the European Socio-economic Classification. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930588Google Scholar
Rose, D., Pevalin, D., & O’Reilly, K. (2005). The National Statistics Socio-economic Classification: Origins, development and use. National Statistics and Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rose, R., & McAllister, I. (1986). Voters begin to choose: From closed-class to open elections in Britain. Sage.Google Scholar
Rydgren, J. (2012). Class politics and the radical right. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203079546Google Scholar
Sides, J., Tesler, M., & Vavreck, L. (2019). Identity crisis: The 2016 presidential campaign and the battle for the meaning of America. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvktrvp5Google Scholar
Smith, T. (1986). Internationally comparable measurement of subjective social class. Presentation at the Planning Meeting of the International Social Survey Programme, Mannheim, April.Google Scholar
Sosnaud, B., Brady, D., & Frenk, S. M. (2013). Class in name only: Subjective class identity, objective class position, and vote choice in American presidential elections. Social Problems, 60(1), 8199. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2013.60.1.81Google Scholar
Spies, D. (2013). Explaining working-class support for extreme right parties: A party competition approach. Acta Politica, 48(3), 296325. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2012.37Google Scholar
Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511614712Google Scholar
Stubager, R. (2008). Education effects on authoritarian–libertarian values: A question of socialization. British Journal of Sociology, 59(2), 327350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00196.xGoogle Scholar
Stuber, J. M. (2006). Talk of class: The discursive repertoires of white working-and upper-middle-class college students. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(3), 285318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241605283569Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25(4), 7997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb00620.xGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. E. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Weakliem, D. L., & Heath, A. F. (1994). Rational choice and class voting. Rationality and Society, 6(2), 243270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463194006002005Google Scholar
Werfhorst, H. G. V. d., & De Graaf, N. D. (2004). The sources of political orientations in post‐industrial society: Social class and education revisited. British Journal of Sociology, 55(2), 211235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00016.xGoogle Scholar
Wright, E. O. (1997). Class counts: Comparative studies in class analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080493Google Scholar
Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: Divided they blog. Paper presented at the Annual Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem, WWW2005, Chiba, Japan, 10–14 May.Google Scholar
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 11301132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160Google Scholar
Berinsky, A. (2017). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000186Google Scholar
Berry, J., & Sobieraj, S. (2013). The outrage industry: Political opinion media and the new incivility. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Billig, M. G., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 2752. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420030103Google Scholar
Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2017). Greater internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 114(40), 1061210617. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706588114Google Scholar
Boysen, G. A., Vogel, D. L., & Madon, S. (2006). A public versus private administration of the implicit association test. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(6), 845856. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.318Google Scholar
Carlin, R. E., & Love, G. J. (2018). Political competition, partisanship and interpersonal trust in electoral democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 115139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000526Google Scholar
Chen, M. K., & Rohla, R. (2018). The effect of partisanship and political advertising on close family ties. Science, 360(6392), 10201024. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq1433Google Scholar
Dias, N., & Lelkes, Y. (2021). The nature of affective polarization: Disentangling policy disagreement from partisan identity. American Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M., Abrams, S., & Pope, J. (2008). Polarization in the American public: Misconceptions and misreadings. Journal of Politics, 70, 556560. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238160808050XGoogle Scholar
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80, 298320. https://doi.org/10.1093/POQ/NFW006Google Scholar
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology, 38(1), 127150. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12394Google Scholar
Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6(3), 347369. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1994.1021Google Scholar
Fowler, E. F., Franz, M. M., & Ridout, T. N. (2018). Political advertising in the United States. Routledge.Google Scholar
Gaertner, S., Dovidio, J., Anastasio, P., Bachman, B., & Rust, M. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000004Google Scholar
Geer, J. G. (2012). The news media and the rise of negativity in presidential campaigns. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(3), 422427. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000492Google Scholar
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 17991839. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr044Google Scholar
Gift, K., & Gift, T. (2015). Does politics influence hiring? Evidence from a randomized experiment. Political Behavior, 37(3), 653675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9286-0Google Scholar
Grimmer, J., & King, G. (2011). General purpose computer-assisted clustering and conceptualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 108(7), 16431650. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018067108Google Scholar
Hovland, C. I, Harvey, O. J., & Sherif, M. (1957). Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55(2), 244252. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048480Google Scholar
Huber, G. A., & Malhotra, N. (2017). Political homophily in social relationships: Evidence from online dating behavior. Journal of Politics, 79(1), 269283. https://doi.org/10.1086/687533Google Scholar
Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aaroe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000604Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 1939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.xGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S., Konitzer, T., & Tedin, K. L. (2018). The home as a political fortress: Family agreement in an era of polarization. Journal of Politics, 80(4), 13261338. https://doi.org/10.1086/698929Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., & Krupenkin, M. T. (2018). The strengthening of partisan affect. Political Psychology, 39(1), 201218. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12487Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. (2019). The origin and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-07303Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152Google Scholar
Klofstad, C., McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2013). The dating preference of liberals and conservatives. Political Behavior, 35(3), 519538. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11109-012-9207-ZGoogle Scholar
Lelkes, Y., Sood, G., & Iyengar, S. (2017). The hostile audience: The effect of access to broadband internet on partisan affect. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 520. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12237Google Scholar
Levendusky, M. S. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levendusky, M. S., & Malhotra, N. (2016). Misperceptions of partisan polarization in the American public. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(1), 378391. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv045Google Scholar
Maccoby, E. E., & Maccoby, N. (1954). The interview: A tool of social science. In Gardner, L. (Ed.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 449487). Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Mason, L. (2015). I disrespectfully agree: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128145. https://doi.org/10.1111/AJPS.12089Google Scholar
Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, N., Poole, K., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, C., Malhotra, N., Margalit, Y., & Levendusky, M. S. (2018). The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 518. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12330Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 233346). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Orr, L. V., & Huber, G. A. (2020). The policy basis of measured partisan animosity in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 64(3), 569586. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12498Google Scholar
Peterson, E., Goel, S., & Iyengar, S. (2021). Partisan selective exposure in online news consumption: Evidence from the 2016 presidential campaign. Political Science Research and Methods, 9(2), 242258. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.55Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2017). The partisan divide on political values grows even wider. Technical Report. http://pewrsr.ch/2z0qBntGoogle Scholar
Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy. How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878425Google Scholar
Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88106. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_01Google Scholar
Rogowski, J. C. (2014). Electoral choice, ideological conflict, and political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 479494. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12059Google Scholar
Rogowski, J. C., & Sutherland, J. L. (2016). How ideology fuels affective polarization. Political Behavior, 38(2), 485508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9323-7Google Scholar
Sears, D. O. (1975). Political socialization. In Greenstein, F. I. & Polsby, N. W. (Eds.), Handbook of political science (Vol. 2, pp. 93153). Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Sears, D. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(2), 233250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.2.233Google Scholar
Sood, G., & Iyengar, S. (2016). Coming to dislike your opponents: The polarizing impact of political campaigns. Available at SSRN 2840225.Google Scholar
Sood, G., & Iyengar, S. (2018). All in the eye of the beholder: Asymmetry in ideological accountability. In Lavine, H. & Taber, C. S. (Eds.), The feeling, thinking citizen (pp. 195227). Routledge.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv8xnhtdGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (3347). Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Theodoridis, A. G. (2017). Me, myself, and (I), (D), or (R)? Partisanship and political cognition through the lens of implicit identity. The Journal of Politics, 79(4), 12531267. https://doi.org/10.1086/692738Google Scholar
Weisberg, H. F., & Rusk, J. G. (1970). Dimensions of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 11671185.Google Scholar
West, E. A., & Iyengar, S. (2020). Partisanship as a social identity: Implications for polarization. Political Behavior, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09637-yGoogle Scholar
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachment as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497Google Scholar
Brandt, M. J., Evans, A. M., & Crawford, J. T. (2015). The unthinking or confident extremist? Political extremists are more likely than moderates to reject experimenter-generated anchors. Psychological Science, 26(2), 189202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614559730Google Scholar
Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G. (2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 2734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413510932Google Scholar
Burke, B. L., Kosloff, S., & Landau, M. J. (2013). Death goes to the polls: A meta-analysis of mortality salience effects on political attitudes. Political Psychology, 34(2), 183200. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12005Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. E. (Ed.), Ideology and its discontents (pp. 206261). The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. T. (2017). Are conservatives more sensitive to threat than liberals? It depends on how we define threat and conservatism. Social Cognition, 35(4), 354373. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.354Google Scholar
Currie, S., & Krouwel, A. (2020). Double anxiety of the upper middle class: The role of relative deprivation in upper-middle-class opposition to EU membership [Manuscript submitted for publication].Google Scholar
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2016). The mechanics of motivated reasoning. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 133140. https://doi.org/10.1257/JEP.30.3.133Google Scholar
Frimer, J. A., Brandt, M. J., Melton, Z., & Motyl, M. (2019). Extremists on the left and right use angry, negative language. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(8), 12161231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218809705Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., & Jonas, E. (2003). Psychological motives and political orientation – The left, the right, and the rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 376382. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.376Google Scholar
Hales, A. H., & Williams, K. D. (2018). Marginalized individuals and extremism: The role of ostracism in openness to extreme groups. Journal of Social Issues, 74(1), 7592. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12257Google Scholar
Hoffer, E. (1951). The true believer. Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Howe, L. C., & Krosnick, J. A. (2017). Attitude strength. Annual Review Psychology, 68, 327351. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033600Google Scholar
Jost, J. J. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246Google Scholar
Krouwel, A. (2012). Party transformations in European democracies. SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Krouwel, A., Kutiyski, Y., Van Prooijen, J.-W., Martinsson, J., & Markstedt, E. (2017). Does extreme political ideology predict conspiracy beliefs, economic evaluations and political trust? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(2), 435462. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i2.745Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M. J., Bélanger, J. J., Sheveland, A., Hetiarachchi, M., & Gunaratra, R. (2014). The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent extremism. Advances in Political Psychology, 35(S1), 6993. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12163Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & De Grada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113(1), 84100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.84Google Scholar
Lammers, J., Koch, A., Conway, P., & Brandt, M. J. (2017). The political domain appears simpler to the political extremes than to political moderates. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(6), 612622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616678456Google Scholar
McGregor, I., Prentice, M., & Nash, K. (2013). Anxious uncertainty and reactive approach motivation (RAM) for religious, idealistic, and lifestyle extremes. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 537563. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12028Google Scholar
Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trustAmerican Journal of Political Science60(4), 824844. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12234Google Scholar
Mols, F., & Jetten, J. (2017). The wealth paradox: Economic prosperity and the hardening of attitudes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nisbet, E. C., Cooper, K. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2015). The partisan brain: How dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis)trust science. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 3666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214555474Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., Harms, P. D., Bruce, M. N., & Lysy, D. C. (2003). The overclaiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 890904. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.890Google Scholar
Rollwage, M., Dolan, R. J., & Fleming, S. M. (2018). Metacognitive failure as a feature of those holding radical beliefs. Current Biology, 28(24), 40144021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.053Google Scholar
Rutjens, B. T., Sutton, R. M., & Van der Lee, R. (2018). Not all skepticism is equal: Exploring the ideological antecedents of science acceptance and rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(3), 384405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217741314Google Scholar
Skitka, L. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 267281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00254.xGoogle Scholar
Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 895917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E., Armor, D., & Peterson, R. S. (1994). The slavery debate in antebellum America: Cognitive style, value conflict, and the limits of compromise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 115126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.115Google Scholar
Toner, K., Leary, M., Asher, M. W., & Jongman-Sereno, K. P. (2013). Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: Extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority. Psychological Science, 24(12), 24542462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613494848Google Scholar
Van den Bos, K. (2018). Why people radicalize: How unfairness judgments are used to fuel radical beliefs, extremist behaviors, and terrorism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, J.-W. (2016). Sometimes inclusion breeds suspicion: Self-uncertainty and belongingness predict belief in conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(3), 267279. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2157Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, J.-W. (2020). An existential threat model of conspiracy theories. European Psychologist, 25(1), 1625. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000381Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2017). Extreme political beliefs predict dogmatic intolerance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(3), 292300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616671403Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2019). Psychological features of extreme political ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(2), 159163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418817755Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2020). Overclaiming knowledge predicts anti-establishment voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(3), 356363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619862260Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., Boiten, M., & Eendebak, L. (2015). Fear among the extremes: How political ideology predicts negative emotions and outgroup derogation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 485497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215569706Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., & Emmer, J. (2018). Ideological responses to the EU refugee crisis: The left, the right, and the extremes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 143150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617731501Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., & Pollet, T. (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 570578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614567356Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Kuijper, S. M. H. C. (2020). A comparison of extreme religious and political ideologies: Similar worldviews but different grievances. Personality and Individual Differences, 159, Article 109888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109888Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Song, M. (2020). The cultural dimension of intergroup conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 112(2), 455473. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12471Google Scholar
Verkuyten, M., Adelman, L., & Yogeeswaran, K. (2020). The psychology of intolerance: Unpacking diverse understandings of intolerance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(5), 467472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420924763Google Scholar
Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C., & Atkinson, M. D. (2016). What drives conspiratorial beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 5771. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915621621Google Scholar
Washburn, A. N., & Skitka, L. J. (2018). Science denial across the political divide: Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to deny attitude-inconsistent science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 972980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617731500Google Scholar
Webber, D., Babush, M., Schori-Eyal, N., et al. (2018). The road to extremism: Field and experimental evidence that significance loss-induced need for closure fosters radicalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(2), 270285. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000111Google Scholar
Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2020). The partisan mind: Is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(3), 407418. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000661Google Scholar
Zwicker, M., Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2020). Persistent beliefs: Political extremism predicts ideological stability over time. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(8), 11371149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220917753Google Scholar

References

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Ash, T. G. (2017). Free speech: Ten principles for a connected world. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2012). Moral disengagement. In Christie, D. J. (Ed.) The encyclopedia of peace psychology (pp. 15). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bartholow, B. D., Bushman, B. J., & Sestir, M. A. (2006). Chronic violent video game exposure and desensitization to violence: Behavioral and event-related brain potential data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(4), 532539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.08.006Google Scholar
BBC. (2018, 1 January). Germany starts enforcing hate speech law. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-42510868Google Scholar
Berendt, J. (2016, 3 October). Protesters in Poland rally against proposal for total abortion ban. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/04/world/europe/poland-abortion-black-monday.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, M., Piccoli, V., Zotti, D., Fasoli, F., & Carnaghi, A. (2017). The impact of homophobic labels on the internalized homophobia and body image of gay men: The moderation role of coming-out. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(3), 356367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X16654735Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M. (2019). Obedient authoritarians or lay Darwinists? Ideological motivations of genocide. In Newman, L. S. (Ed.), Confronting humanity at its worst: Social psychological perspectives on genocide (pp. 2961). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190685942.003.0002Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M., Kamińska, O. K., Winiewski, M., & Soral, W. (2017). From disgust to contempt-speech: The nature of contempt on the map of prejudicial emotions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000686Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M., Marchlewska, M., Soral, W., & Winiewski, M. (2014). Hate speech in Poland 2014: Summary of the national opinion poll. Stefan Batory Foundation.Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M., & Soral, W. (2020). Hate speech epidemic: The dynamic effects of derogatory language on intergroup relations and political radicalization. Advances in Political Psychology, 41(S1), 333. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12670Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M., Soral, W., Marchlewska, M., & Winiewski, M. (2017). When authoritarians confront prejudice: Differential effects of SDO and RWA on support for hate‐speech prohibition. Political Psychology, 38(1), 8799. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12313Google Scholar
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 73137318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114Google Scholar
Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism? Theory and Society, 46, 357385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7Google Scholar
Bulska, D., & Winiewski, M. (2018). Irrational critique of Israel and Palestine: New clothes for traditional prejudice? Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i1.25497Google Scholar
Clement, J. (2020). Number of global social network users 2010-2023 [Data set]. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/Google Scholar
Cohen, F., Jussim, L., Harber, K. D., & Bhasin, G. (2009). Modern anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 290306. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015338Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (1997). Recommendation No. R (97) 20 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on ‘Hate Speech’. https://rm.coe.int/1680505d5bGoogle Scholar
Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631Google Scholar
Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41114). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6Google Scholar
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 18611894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.xGoogle Scholar
Facebook. (2021). Community standards – hate speech. https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/hate_speech/Google Scholar
Fasoli, F., Maass, A., & Carnaghi, A. (2015). Labelling and discrimination: Do homophobic epithets undermine fair distribution of resources? British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(2), 383393. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12090Google Scholar
Fasoli, F., Paladino, M. P., Carnaghi, A., Jetten, J., Bastian, B., & Bain, P. G. (2016). Not ‘just words’: Exposure to homophobic epithets leads to dehumanizing and physical distancing from gay men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 237248. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2148Google Scholar
Fritze, J. (2019). Trump used words like ‘invasion’ and ‘killer’ to discuss immigrants at rallies 500 times. USA TODAY. https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/08/08/trump-immigrants-rhetoric-criticized-el-paso-dayton-shootings/1936742001/Google Scholar
Gervais, M. M., & Fessler, D. M. (2017). On the deep structure of social affect: Attitudes, emotions, sentiments, and the case of ‘contempt’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000352Google Scholar
Gorwa, R. (2017). Computational propaganda in Poland: False amplifiers and the digital public sphere [Working Paper No. 2017.4]. University of Oxford, Computational Propaganda Research Project.Google Scholar
Grabowski, J. (2009). German anti-Jewish propaganda in the Generalgouvernement, 1939–1945: Inciting hate through posters, films, and exhibitions. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 23(3), 381412. https://doi.org/10.1093/HGS/DCP040Google Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 10291046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1985). The effect of an overheard ethnic slur on evaluations of the target: How to spread a social disease. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(1), 6172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90006-XGoogle Scholar
Hawdon, J., Oksanen, A., & Räsänen, P. (2017). Exposure to online hate in four nations: A cross-national consideration. Deviant Behavior, 38(3), 254266. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1196985Google Scholar
Herf, J. (2006). The Jewish enemy: Nazi propaganda during World War II and the Holocaust. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038592Google Scholar
Imhoff, R., Dieterle, L., & Lamberty, P. (2020). Resolving the puzzle of conspiracy worldview and political activism: Belief in secret plots decreases normative but increases nonnormative political engagement. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 7179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619896491Google Scholar
Jacobs, J., & Potter, K. (1998). Hate crimes: Criminal law and identity politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. F., Leahy, R., Johnson Restrepo, N. J., et al. (2019). Hidden resilience adaptive dynamics of the global online hate ecology. Nature, 573, 261265. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1494-7Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600Google Scholar
Kaakinen, M., Oksanen, A., & Räsänen, P. (2018). Did the risk of exposure to online hate increase after the November 2015 Paris attacks? A group relations approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 9097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.022Google Scholar
Kempf, W. (2012). Antisemitism and criticism of Israel: A methodological challenge for peace research. Journal for the Study of Antisemitism, 4(2), 515532.Google Scholar
Kirkland, S. L., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1987). Further evidence of the deleterious effects of overheard derogatory ethnic labels: Derogation beyond the target. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13(2), 216227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167287132007Google Scholar
Kteily, N., & Bruneau, E. (2017). Backlash: The politics and real-world consequences of minority group dehumanization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 87104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216675334Google Scholar
Leader, T., Mullen, B., & Rice, D. (2009). Complexity and valence in ethnophaulisms and exclusion of ethnic out-groups: What puts the ‘hate’ into hate speech? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), 170182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013066Google Scholar
Leets, L. (2002). Experiencing hate speech: Perceptions and responses to anti-Semitism and antigay speech. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 341361. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00264Google Scholar
Lemarchand, R. (2002). Disconnecting the threads: Rwanda and the Holocaust reconsidered. Journal of Genocide Research, 4(4), 499518. https://doi.org/10.1080/146235022000000436Google Scholar
Levene, M. (1998). Creating a modern ‘zone of genocide’: The impact of nation-and state-formation on eastern Anatolia, 1878–1923. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 12(3), 393433. https://doi.org/10.1093/HGS/12.3.393Google Scholar
Mathew, B., Dutt, R., Goyal, P., & Mukherjee, A. (2019, June). Spread of hate speech in online social media. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on web science (pp. 173–182). https://doi.org/10.1145/3292522.3326034Google Scholar
Mullen, B., & Rice, D. R. (2003). Ethnophaulisms and exclusion: The behavioral consequences of cognitive representation of ethnic immigrant groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(8), 10561067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254505Google Scholar
Mullen, B., & Smyth, J. M. (2004). Immigrant suicide rates as a function of ethnophaulisms: Hate speech predicts death. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(6), 343348. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000126197.59447.b3Google Scholar
Nockleby, J. T. (2000). Hate speech. In Levy, K., Karst, K., & Mahoney, D. J. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the American constitution (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 12771279). Macmillan.Google Scholar
Oksanen, A., Hawdon, J., Holkeri, E., Näsi, M., & Räsänen, P. (2014). Exposure to online hate among young social media users. In Warehime, N. M. (Ed.), Soul of society: A focus on the lives of children & youth (Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, Vol. 18, pp. 253273). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-466120140000018021Google Scholar
Oksanen, A., Kaakinen, M., Minkkinen, J., Räsänen, P., Enjolras, B., & Steen-Johnsen, K. (2020). Perceived societal fear and cyberhate after the November 2015 Paris terrorist attacks. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), 10471066. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1442329Google Scholar
Piliavin, I. M., Rodin, J., & Piliavin, J. A. (1969). Good samaritanism: An underground phenomenon? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(4), 289299. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028433Google Scholar
Roseman, I. J., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 206221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.206Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M., Confessore, N., & Cadwalladr, C. (2018, 17 March). How Trump consultants exploited the Facebook data of millions. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/17/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign.htmlGoogle Scholar
Simon, L., & Greenberg, J. (1996). Further progress in understanding the effects of derogatory ethnic labels: The role of preexisting attitudes toward the targeted group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(12), 11951204. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962212001Google Scholar
Soral, W., Bilewicz, M., & Winiewski, M. (2018). Exposure to hate speech increases prejudice through desensitization. Aggressive Behavior, 44(2), 136146. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21737Google Scholar
Soral, W., Bilewicz, M., Winiewski, M., & Bulska, D. (2020). Family acceptance as a buffer against hate-speech induced depression [Manuscript submitted for publication].Google Scholar
Soral, W., Liu, J. H., & Bilewicz, M. (2020). Media of contempt: Social media consumption increases normativity of xenophobic verbal violence. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 14. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-3774Google Scholar
Stola, D. (2006). Anti-Zionism as a multipurpose policy instrument: The anti-Zionist campaign in Poland, 1967–1968. The Journal of Israeli History, 25(1), 175201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13531040500503021Google Scholar
Straus, S. (2006). The order of genocide: race, power and war in Rwanda. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801467158Google Scholar
Timberg, C., & Dwoskin, E. (2020, 10 July). Silicon Valley is getting tougher on Trump and his supporters over hate speech and disinformation. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/07/10/hate-speech-trump-tech/Google Scholar
Walker, S. (1994). Hate speech: The history of an American controversy. Bison Books.Google Scholar
Winiewski, M., Hansen, K., Bilewicz, M., Soral, W., Świderska, A., & Bulska, D. (2017). Contempt speech, hate speech: Report from research on verbal violence against minority groups. Stefan Batory Foundation.Google Scholar
Winiewski, M., Soral, W., & Bilewicz, M. (2015). Conspiracy theories on the map of stereotype content. In Bilewicz, M., Cichocka, A., & Soral, W. (Eds.), The psychology of conspiracy (pp. 2341). Routledge.Google Scholar
Wypych, M., Zochniak, K., & Bilewicz, M. (2020). Mowa nienawiści jako stygmatyzacja: Doświadczenia kontaktu z mową nienawiści wśród studentów zagranicznych oraz imigrantów w Polsce [Hate speech as a stigma: The experience of contact with hate speech among foreign students and immigrants in Poland]. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 64(3), 199219. https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2020.64.3.10Google Scholar

References

Ackermann, K., Zampieri, E., & Freitag, M. (2018). Personality and voting for a right-wing populist party: Evidence from Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(4), 545565.Google Scholar
Aichholzer, J., & Zandonella, M. (2016). Psychological bases of support for radical right parties. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 185190.Google Scholar
Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslove, A. (2014). How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 13241353.Google Scholar
Akkerman, A., Zaslove, A., & Spruyt, B. (2017). ‘We the people’ or ‘We the peoples’? A comparison of support for the populist radical right and populist radical left in the Netherlands. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 377403.Google Scholar
Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (2015). Populists in power. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N., Rooduijn, M., & Schumacher, G. (2016). The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 302420.Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., & Rooduijn, M. (2020). The populist appeal: Personality and anti-establishment communication. The Journal of Politics, 83(2). https://doi.org/10.1086/710014Google Scholar
Berman, S. (2017, 20 December). Populism is a problem: Elitist technocrats aren’t the solution. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/12/20/populism-is-a-problem-elitist-technocrats-arent-the-solution/Google Scholar
Bødker, H., & Anderson, C. (2019). Populist time: Mediating immediacy and delay in liberal democracy. International Journal of Communication, 13, 59485966.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Personalizing politics: A congruency model of political preference. American Psychologist, 59(7), 581594.Google Scholar
Castanho Silva, B., Andreadis, I., Anduiza, E., et al. (2018). Public opinion surveys: A new scale. In Hawkins, K., Carlin, R., Littvay, L., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (Eds.), The ideational approach to populism: Theory, method & analysis (pp. 150178). Routledge.Google Scholar
Castanho Silva, B., Jungkunz, S., Helbling, M., & Littvay, L. (2020). An empirical investigation of seven populist attitudes scales. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 409424.Google Scholar
Duckitt, J. (1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10(1), 6384.Google Scholar
Fatke, M. (2019). The personality of populists: How the Big Five traits relate to populist attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 138151.Google Scholar
Geurkink, B., Zaslove, A., Sluiter, R., & Jacobs, K. (2020). Populist attitudes, political trust, and external political efficacy: Old wine in new bottles? Political Studies, 68(1), 247267.Google Scholar
Hauwaert, S., Acevedo, F., & Schimpf, C. (2020). The measurement of populist attitudes: Testing cross-national scales using item response theory. Political Studies, 40(1), 321.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K. A. (2009). Is Chavez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 10401067.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K. A., Carlin, R. E., Littvay, L., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (Eds.). (2019). The ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory and analysis. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K. A., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). The ideational approach to populism. Latin American Research Review, 52(4), 513528.Google Scholar
Huber, R., & Schimpf, C. (2017). On the distinct effects of left-wing and right-wing populism on democratic quality. Politics and Governance, 5(4), 146165.Google Scholar
Jansen, R. S. (2011). Populist mobilization: A new theoretical approach to populism. Sociological Theory, 29(2), 7596.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2019). Anger and authoritarianism mediate the effects of fear on support for the far right: What Vasilopoulos et al. (2019) really found. Political Psychology, 40(4), 705711.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., & Andrews, R. (2011). System justification theory. In Christie, D. J. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of peace psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 10921096). Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307337.Google Scholar
Kappe, R. (2015). The political psychology of UKIP: Personality factors, authoritarianism and support for right-wing populist parties in Britain. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties (EPOP) specialist group, Cardiff University, 1113 September 2015.Google Scholar
Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., Smits, D. J. M., De Boeck, P., & Ceulemans, E. (2007). Individual differences in patterns of appraisal and anger experience. Cognition and Emotion, 21(4), 689713.Google Scholar
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). Verso.Google Scholar
Magni, G. (2017). It’s the emotions, stupid! Anger about the economic crisis, low political efficacy, and support for populist parties. Electoral Studies, 50, 91102.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2005). Ruling the void: The hollowing of Western democracy. Verso.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J., & Macedo, S. (2019). Populism and democratic theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15, 5977.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. E., Russell Neuman, W., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. E., Valentino, N. A., Vasilopoulos, P., & Foucault, M. (2019). Applying the theory of affective intelligence to support for authoritarian policies and parties. Political Psychology, 40(1), 109139.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. (2021). Populists in power: Perils and prospects. Institute for Global Change. https://institute.global/policy/populists-power-perils-and-prospects-2021Google Scholar
Mohrenberg, S., Huber, R. A., & Freyburg, T. (2019). Love at first sight? Populist attitudes and support for direct democracy. Party Politics, 27(3), 528539.Google Scholar
Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542563.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2017). Populism: An ideational approach. In Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., & Ostiguy, P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 2747). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (Eds.). (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat and corrective to democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (2019). Varieties of populist parties. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 45(9–10), 9811012.Google Scholar
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pappas, T. S. (2016). Modern populism: Research advances, conceptual and methodological pitfalls, and the minimal definition. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.17Google Scholar
Pappas, T. S. (2019). Populists in power. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 7084.Google Scholar
Pauwels, T. (2014). Populism in Western Europe: Comparing Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. Routledge.Google Scholar
Rico, G., Guinjoan, M., & Anduiza, E. (2017). The emotional underpinnings of populism: How anger and fear affect populist attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 444461.Google Scholar
Rooduijn, M. (2018). What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 351368.Google Scholar
Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., & Ostiguy, P. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Santana, A., & Rama, J. (2018). Electoral support for left wing populist parties in Europe: Addressing the globalization cleavage. European Politics and Society, 19(5), 558576.Google Scholar
Schoen, H., & Schumann, S. (2007). Personality traits, partisan attitudes, and voting behavior: Evidence from Germany. Political Psychology, 28(4), 471498.Google Scholar
Schulz, A., Müller, P., Schemer, C., Wirz, D. S., Wettstein, M., & Wirth, W. (2018). Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(2), 316326.Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Federico, C. M., & Pratto, F. (2001). Legitimizing ideologies: The social dominance approach. In Jost, J. T. & Major, B. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 307331). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. A., & Kirby, L. D. (2001). Affect and cognitive appraisal processes. In Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition. (pp. 7592). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Spierings, N., & Zaslove, A. (2015). Gendering the vote for populist radical-right parties. Patterns of Prejudice, 49(1–2), 135162.Google Scholar
Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Open University Press.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2019). Me the people: How populism transforms democracy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Hauwaert, S., & van Kessel, S. (2017). Beyond protest and discontent: A cross‐national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 6892.Google Scholar
Vasilopoulos, P., & Jost, J. T. (2020). Psychological similarities and dissimilarities between left-wing and right-wing populists: Evidence from a nationally representative survey in France. Journal of Research in Personality, 88, 111.Google Scholar
Vasilopoulos, P., Marcus, G. E., Valentino, N. A., & Foucault, M. (2019a). Fear, anger, and voting for the far right: Evidence from the November 13, 2015 Paris terror attacks. Political Psychology, 40(4), 679705.Google Scholar
Vasilopoulos, P., Marcus, G. E., Valentino, N. A., & Foucault, M. (2019b). Anger mediates the effects of fear on support for the far right: A rejoinder. Political Psychology, 40(4), 713717.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 122.Google Scholar
Wirth, W., Esser, F., Wettstein, M., et al. (2016). The appeal of populist ideas, strategies, and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication. NCCR Democracy Working Paper series 88, University of Zürich. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-127461Google Scholar
Wuttke, A., Schimpf, C., & Schoen, H. (2020). When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts: On the conceptualization and measurement of populist attitudes and other multidimensional constructs. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 356374.Google Scholar
Zandonella, M., & Zeglovits, E. (2012). Young men and their vote for the radical right in Austria: Can personality traits, right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation contribute to the explanation of radical right voting? Politics, Culture and Socialization, 3(1–2), 6382.Google Scholar
Zulianello, M. (2019). Anti-system parties: From parliamentary breakthrough to government. Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Alemán, J., & Woods, D. (2016). Value orientations from the World Values Survey: How comparable are they cross-nationally?. Comparative Political Studies, 49(8), 10391067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015600458Google Scholar
Alexander, A. C., & Welzel, C. (2017). The myth of deconsolidation [Online exchange]. Journal of Democracy. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/online-exchange-democratic-deconsolidation/Google Scholar
Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1996). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A. (2001). Ten years after the Soviet breakup: From democratization to guided democracy. Journal of Democracy, 12(4), 3541. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2001.0063Google Scholar
Brunkert, L., Kruse, S., & Welzel, C. (2019). A tale of culture-bound regime evolution: The centennial democratic trend and its recent reversal. Democratization, 26(3), 422443. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1542430Google Scholar
Chenoweth, E., & Cunningham, K. G. (2013). Understanding nonviolent resistance: An introduction. Journal of Peace Research, 50(3), 271276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343313480381Google Scholar
Cho, Y. (2014). To know democracy is to love it: A cross-national analysis of democratic understanding and political support for democracy. Political Research Quarterly, 67(3), 478488. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912914532721Google Scholar
Claassen, C. (2019). Does public support help democracy to survive?. American Journal of Political Science, 64(1), 118134. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12452Google Scholar
Crozier, M., Huntington, S. P., Watanuki, J., & Commission, T. (1975). The crisis of democracy: Report on the governability of democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1973). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268436.001.0001Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (2013). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (6th ed.). CQ Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (2018). Political realignment (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198830986.001.0001Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J., & Welzel, C. (Eds.). (2014). The civic culture transformed: From allegiant to assertive citizens. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600002Google Scholar
Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2016). The danger of deconsolidation: The democratic disconnect. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 517. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0049Google Scholar
Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2017). The signs of deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 515. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0000Google Scholar
Goldstone, J. A., & Diamond, L. (2020). Demography and the future of democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 18(3), 867880. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719005000Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1). Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., et al. (2018). World Values Survey, time-pooled waves 1 to 6 dataset. JD Systems.Google Scholar
Held, D. (1997). Models of democracy. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. F. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. F. (2018). Cultural evolution: People’s motivations are changing, and reshaping the world. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108613880Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790881Google Scholar
Kirsch, H., & Welzel, C. (2019). Democracy misunderstood: Authoritarian notions of democracy around the globe. Social Forces, 98(1), 5992. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy114Google Scholar
Kruse, S., Ravlik, M., & Welzel, C. (2019). Democracy confused: When people mistake the absence of democracy for its presence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(3), 315335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118821437Google Scholar
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Lührmann, A., & Lindberg, S. I. (2019). A third wave of autocratization is here: What is new about it?. Democratization, 26(7), 10951113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029Google Scholar
Márquez, X. (2017). Non-democratic politics: Authoritarianism, dictatorship, and democratization. Palgrave, Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
Mechkova, V., Lührmann, A., & Lindberg, S. I. (2017). How much democratic backsliding?. Journal of Democracy, 28(4), 162169. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0075Google Scholar
Moore, B. (1966). The social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical citizens. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198295685.001.0001Google Scholar
Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610073Google Scholar
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973383Google Scholar
Norris, P. (2017). Is democracy backsliding? [Online Exchange]. Journal of Democracy. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/online-exchange-democratic-deconsolidation/Google Scholar
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595841Google Scholar
Pharr, S. J., & Putnam, R. D. (Eds.). (2000). Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. Viking.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1945). The open society and its enemies. Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosling, H., Rosling, O., & Rosling Roennlund, A. (2018). Factfulness: Ten reasons we’re wrong about the world – and why things are better than you think. Flatiron Books.Google Scholar
Sokolov, B. (2018). The index of emancipative values: Measurement model misspecifications. American Political Science Review, 112(2), 395408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000624Google Scholar
Van den Bosch, J. J. J. (2020). Introducing regime cluster theory: Framing regional diffusion dynamics of democracy and autocracy promotion. International Journal of Political Theory, 4(1), 71106. https://philarchive.org/archive/VANIRC-2v1Google Scholar
Voeten, E. (2017). Turning away from democracy [Online exchange]. Journal of Democracy. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/online-exchange-democratic-deconsolidation/Google Scholar
Welzel, C. (2013). Freedom rising: Human empowerment and the quest for emancipation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139540919Google Scholar
Welzel, C. (2020). The cultural pre-requisites of democracy. In Rohrschneider, R. & Thomassen, J. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political representation of liberal democracies (pp. 7694). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198825081.001.0001Google Scholar
Welzel, C. (2021). Democratic horizons: What value change reveals about the future of democracy. Democratization, 28(5), 9921016. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1883001Google Scholar
Welzel, C., Brunkert, L., Inglehart, R. F., & Kruse, S. (2019). Measurement equivalence? A tale of false obsessions and a cure. World Values Research, 11(3), 5484.Google Scholar
Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. F. (2016). Misconceptions of measurement equivalence: Time for a paradigm shift. Comparative Political Studies, 49(8), 10681094. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016628275Google Scholar
Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. F. (2019). Political culture, mass beliefs and value change. In Haerpfer, C., Bernhagen, P., Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. F. (Eds.), Democratization (2nd ed., pp. 134157). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780199233021.003.0007Google Scholar
Yilmaz, H. (2019). The international context. In Haerpfer, C., Bernhagen, P., Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. F. (Eds.), Democratization (2nd ed., pp. 103118). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780199233021.003.0007Google Scholar

References

Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 444455.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., & Cryderman, J. (2013). Communication, persuasion, and the conditioning value of selective exposure: Like minds may unite and divide but they mostly tune out. Political Communication, 30(2), 213231.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., & Kolodny, R. (2009). Educating the least informed: Group endorsements in a grassroots campaign. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 755770.Google Scholar
Barton, J., Castillo, M., & Petrie, R. (2014). What persuades voters? A field experiment on political campaigning. The Economic Journal, 124(574), F293F326.Google Scholar
Becker, A. B. (2012). Engaging celebrity? Measuring the impact of issue-advocacy messages on situational involvement, complacency and apathy. Celebrity Studies, 3(2), 213231.Google Scholar
Broockman, D. E., Kalla, J. L., & Sekhon, J. S. (2017). The design of field experiments with survey outcomes: A framework for selecting more efficient, robust, and ethical designs. Political Analysis, 25(4), 435464.Google Scholar
Bryan, C. J., Walton, G. M., Rogers, T., & Dweck, C. S. (2011). Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(31), 1265312656.Google Scholar
Bryan, C. J., Yeager, D. S., & O’Brien, J. M. (2019). Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(51), 2553525545.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116131.Google Scholar
Cantoni, E., & Pons, V. (2016). Do interactions with candidates increase voter support and participation?: Experimental evidence from Italy. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 16-080.Google Scholar
Cho, D. (2008). Acting on the intent to vote: A voter turnout experiment. Available at SSRN 1402025.Google Scholar
Chong, D., & Junn, J. (2011). Politics from the perspective of minority populations. In Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., & Lupia, A. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (pp. 320336). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. Quill.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard Business Review, 79(9), 7281.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control. Psychometrika, 72(2), 263268.Google Scholar
Coppock, A., & Green, D. P. (2016). Is voting habit forming? New evidence from experiments and regression discontinuities. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 10441062.Google Scholar
Coppock, A., Hill, S. J., & Vavreck, L. (2020). The small effects of political advertising are small regardless of context, message, sender, or receiver: Evidence from 59 real-time randomized experimentsScience Advances6(36), Article eabc4046.Google Scholar
Dawson, M. C. (1995). Behind the mule: Race and class in African-American politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eldersveld, S. J. (1956). Experimental propaganda techniques and voting behavior. American Political Science Review, 50(1), 154165.Google Scholar
Foos, F. (n.d.). First impressions – lasting impressions? The short-and long-term effects of candidate contact on voting intentions. http://www.florianfoos.net/resources/Foos_persuasion.pdfGoogle Scholar
Foos, F. (2018). The parliamentary candidate as persuader: Evidence from randomized candidate-voter interactions. http://www.florianfoos.net/resources/Candidate_as_persuader_Foos.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fraga, B. L. (2018). The turnout gap: Race, ethnicity, and political inequality in a diversifying America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, A., Huber, G., & Fang, A. (2018). Do subtle linguistic interventions priming a social identity as a voter have outsized effects on voter turnout? Evidence from a new replication experiment. Political Psychology, 39(4), 925938.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2000). The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 653663.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2017). Field experiments on voter mobilization: An overview of a burgeoning literature. In Banerjee, A. V. & Duflo, E. (Eds.), Handbook of economic field experiments (Vol. 1, pp. 395438). North-Holland.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 3348.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2015). Small cues and large effect: The results from a collection of simultaneous field experiments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, 17 April 2015.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Biggers, D. R., & Hendry, D. J. (2016a). Reply to Bryan et al.: Variation in context unlikely explanation of nonrobustness of noun versus verb results. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(43), E6549E6550.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Biggers, D. R., & Hendry, D. J. (2016b). A field experiment shows that subtle linguistic cues might not affect voter behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(26), 71127117.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2011a). Personality traits and the consumption of political information. American Politics Research, 39(1), 3284.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2011b). The big five personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 265287.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Panagopoulos, C. (2013). Big five personality traits and responses to persuasive appeals: Results from voter turnout experiments. Political Behavior, 35(4), 687728.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., Raso, C., & Ha, S. E. (2011). Personality traits and participation in political processes. The Journal of Politics, 73(3), 692706.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., & Fang, A. H. (2019). Voting behavior unaffected by subtle linguistic cues: Evidence from a psychologically authentic replication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1–15.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Fang, A. H., & Gooch, A. (2017). The generalizability of social pressure effects on turnout across high-salience electoral contexts: Field experimental evidence from 1.96 million citizens in 17 states. American Politics Research, 45(4), 533559.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Fang, A. H., & Reardon, C. E. (2016). The comparative effectiveness of communicating positive versus negative descriptive norms on turnout. Yale University Working Paper.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., & Rogers, T. (2009). Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody’s voting and so should you. The Journal of Politics, 71(1), 178191.Google Scholar
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472482.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493503.Google Scholar
Gosnell, H. F. (1927). Getting out the vote. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2002). The downstream benefits of experimentation. Political Analysis, 10(4), 394402.Google Scholar
Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2016). Voter mobilization, experimentation, and translational social science. Perspectives on Politics, 14(3), 738749.Google Scholar
Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2019). Get out the vote: How to increase voter turnout. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Green, D. P., & Zelizer, A. (2017). How much GOTV mail is too much? Results from a large-scale field experiment. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 4(2), 107118.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., Carnot, C. G., Beach, R., & Young, B. (1987). Increasing voting behavior by asking people if they expect to vote. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 315318.Google Scholar
Gross, A. E., Schmidt, M. J., Keating, J. P., & Saks, M. J. (1974). Persuasion, surveillance, and voting behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(5), 451460.Google Scholar
Hartmann, G. W. (1936). A field experiment on the comparative effectiveness of ‘emotional’ and ‘rational’ political leaflets in determining election results. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31(1), 99114.Google Scholar
Hassell, H. J., & Wyler, E. E. (2019). Negative descriptive social norms and political action: People aren’t acting, so you should. Political Behavior, 41(1), 231256.Google Scholar
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635650.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. J., & Darrow, T. I. A. (2005). The influence of celebrity endorsements on young adults’ political opinions. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(3), 8098.Google Scholar
Jamieson, K. H., & Hardy, B. W. (2009). Media, endorsements, and the 2008 primaries. In Smith, S. S. & Springer, M. J. (Eds.), Reforming the presidential nomination process (pp. 6484). Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kalla, J. L., & Broockman, D. E. (2018). The minimal persuasive effects of campaign contact in general elections: Evidence from 49 field experiments. American Political Science Review, 112(1), 148166.Google Scholar
Kalla, J. L., & Broockman, D. E. (2020). Reducing exclusionary attitudes through interpersonal conversation: Evidence from three field experiments. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 410425.Google Scholar
Kellermann, K., & Cole, T. (1994). Classifying compliance gaining messages: Taxonomic disorder and strategic confusion. Communication Theory, 4(1), 360.Google Scholar
Marwell, G., & Schmitt, D. R. (1967). Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: An empirical analysis. Sociometry, 350–364.Google Scholar
Mendelberg, T. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morin, D. T., Ivory, J. D., & Tubbs, M. (2012). Celebrity and politics: Effects of endorser credibility and sex on voter attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors. The Social Science Journal, 49(4), 413420.Google Scholar
Murray, G. R., & Matland, R. E. (2014). Mobilization effects using mail: Social pressure, descriptive norms, and timing. Political Research Quarterly, 67(2), 304319.Google Scholar
Nickerson, D. W. (2007). The ineffectiveness of e-vites to democracy: Field experiments testing the role of e-mail on voter turnout. Social Science Computer Review, 25(4), 494503.Google Scholar
Nickerson, D. W., & Rogers, T. (2010). Do you have a voting plan? Implementation intentions, voter turnout, and organic plan making. Psychological Science, 21(2), 194199.Google Scholar
Panagopoulos, C., Larimer, C. W., & Condon, M. (2014). Social pressure, descriptive norms, and voter mobilization. Political Behavior, 36(2), 451469.Google Scholar
Rogers, T., Green, D. P., Ternovski, J., & Young, C. F. (2017). Social pressure and voting: A field experiment conducted in a high-salience election. Electoral Studies, 46, 87100.Google Scholar
Settle, J. E., Dawes, C. T., Loewen, P. J., & Panagopoulos, C. (2017 ). Negative affectivity, political contention, and turnout: A genopolitics field experiment. Political Psychology, 38(6), 10651082.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R., Green, D. P., Gimpel, J. G., & Gerber, A. S. (2012). Do robotic calls from credible sources influence voter turnout or vote choice? Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Political Marketing, 11(4), 231245.Google Scholar
Sherman, S. J. (1980). On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 211221.Google Scholar
Smith, J. K., Gerber, A. S., & Orlich, A. (2003). Self-prophecy effects and voter turnout: An experimental replication. Political Psychology, 24(3), 593604.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Trivedi, N. (2005). The effect of identity-based GOTV direct mail appeals on the turnout of Indian Americans. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601(1), 115122.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, A. A., & Michelson, M. R. (2016). Turnout, status, and identity: Mobilizing Latinos to vote with group appeals. American Political Science Review, 110(4), 615630.Google Scholar
Walton, G. M. (2014). The new science of wise psychological interventions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 7382.Google Scholar

References

Ayanian, A. H., & Tausch, N. (2016). How risk perception shapes collective action intentions in repressive contexts: A study of Egyptian activists during the 2013 post‐coup uprising. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(4), 700721.Google Scholar
Becker, J. C. (2012). Virtual special issue on theory and research on collective action in the European Journal of Social Psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 1923.Google Scholar
Becker, J. C. (2020). Ideology and the promotion of social change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 611.Google Scholar
Becker, J. C., & Tausch, N. (2014). When group memberships are negative: The concept, measurement, and behavioral implications of psychological disidentification. Self and Identity, 13(3), 294321.Google Scholar
Becker, J. C., Wright, S. C., Lubensky, M. E., & Zhou, S. (2013). Friend or ally: Whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends on what advantaged group members say (or don’t say). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(4), 442455.Google Scholar
Bliuc, A., McGarty, C., Reynolds, K. J., & Muntele, D. (2007). Opinion-based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 1932.Google Scholar
Bongiorno, R., McGarty, C., Kurz, T., Haslam, S. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2016). Mobilizing cause supporters through group‐based interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(4), 203215.Google Scholar
Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 2940.Google Scholar
Cakal, H., Hewstone, M., Schwär, G., & Heath, A. (2011). An investigation of the social identity model of collective action and the ‘sedative’ effect of intergroup contact among black and white students in South Africa. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 606627.Google Scholar
Cameron, J. E., & Nickerson, S. L. (2009). Predictors of protest among anti‐globalization demonstrators. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(3), 734761.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the age of the Internet. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Chayinska, M., Minescu, A., & McGarty, C. (2019). ‘We fight for a better future for our country’: Understanding the Ukrainian Euromaidan movement as the emergence of a social competition strategy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 4565.Google Scholar
Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Choma, B., Hodson, G., Jagayat, A., & Hoffarth, M. R. (2019). Right‐wing ideology as a predictor of collective action: A test across four political issue domains. Political Psychology, 41(2), 303322.Google Scholar
Dixon, J., Levine, M., Reicher, S., & Durrheim, K. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(6), 411425.Google Scholar
Dixon, J., Tropp, L. R., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2010). ‘Let them eat harmony’: Prejudice-reduction strategies and attitudes of historically disadvantaged groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(2), 7680.Google Scholar
Droogendyk, L., Wright, S. C., Lubensky, M., & Louis, W. R. (2016). Acting in solidarity: Cross‐group contact between disadvantaged group members and advantaged group allies. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 315334.Google Scholar
Drury, J., Cocking, C., Beale, J., Hanson, C., & Rapley, F. (2005). The phenomenology of empowerment in collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 309328.Google Scholar
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 3558.Google Scholar
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 707725.Google Scholar
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual‐process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 18611894.Google Scholar
Duncan, L. E. (2012). The psychology of collective action. In Deaux, K. & Snyder, M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 781803). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Kovacheff, C. (2020). The activist’s dilemma: Extreme protest actions reduce popular support for social movements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 10861111.Google Scholar
Hoskin, R. E., Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. (2019). Transnational contact and challenging global poverty: Intergroup contact intensifies (the right kind of) social identities to promote solidarity‐based collective action for those low in social dominance. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(1), 2334.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Becker, J., Osborne, D., & Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 99108.Google Scholar
Kende, A., van Zomeren, M., Ujhelyi, A., & Lantos, N. A. (2016). The social affirmation use of social media as a motivator of collective action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(8), 453469.Google Scholar
Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Klandermans, B. (2002). How group identification helps to overcome the dilemma of collective action. American Behavioural Scientist, 45(5), 887900.Google Scholar
Leach, C. W., Iyer, A., & Pedersen, A. (2007). Angry opposition to government redress: When the structurally advantaged perceive themselves as relatively deprived. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(1), 191204.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1947). Group decision and social change. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Livingstone, A. G. (2014). Why the psychology of collective action requires qualitative transformation as well as quantitative change. Contemporary Social Science, 9(1), 121134.Google Scholar
Louis, W. (2009). Collective action – and then what?. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 727748.Google Scholar
Louis, W. R., Amiot, C. E., Thomas, E. F., & Blackwood, L. (2016). The ‘activist identity’ and activism across domains: A multiple identities analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 242263.Google Scholar
Louis, W. R., Taylor, D. M., & Douglas, R. L. (2005). Normative influence and rational conflict decisions: Group norms and cost-benefit analyses for intergroup behaviour. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8(4), 355374.Google Scholar
Louis, W., Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Lizzio-Wilson, M., Amiot, C. A., & Moghaddam, F. (2020). The volatility of collective action: Theoretical analysis and empirical data. Political Psychology, 41(S1), 3574.Google Scholar
McGarty, C., Bliuc, A.-M., Thomas, E., & Bongiorno, R. (2009). Collective action as the material expression of opinion-based group membership. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 839857.Google Scholar
McGarty, C., Thomas, E. F., Lala, G., Smith, L. G., & Bliuc, A. M. (2014). New technologies, new identities, and the growth of mass opposition in the Arab Spring. Political Psychology, 35(6), 725740.Google Scholar
Meleady, R., & Vermue, M. (2019). The effect of intergroup contact on solidarity‐based collective action is mediated by reductions in SDO. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(5), 307318.Google Scholar
Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 229245.Google Scholar
Orazani, S. N., & Leidner, B. (2019). The power of nonviolence: Confirming and explaining the success of nonviolent (rather than violent) political movements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(4), 688704.Google Scholar
Osborne, D., Jost, J. T., Becker, J. C., Badaan, V., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). Protesting to challenge or defend the system? A system justification perspective on collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 244269.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751783.Google Scholar
Reicher, S. (2007). Rethinking the paradigm of prejudice. South African Journal of Psychology, 37(4), 820834.Google Scholar
Saeri, A. K., Iyer, A., & Louis, W. R. (2015). Right‐wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict outsiders’ responses to an external group conflict: Implications for identification, anger, and collective action. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 15(1), 303332.Google Scholar
Schumann, S., & Klein, O. (2015). Substitute or stepping stone? Assessing the impact of low‐threshold online collective actions on offline participation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 308322.Google Scholar
Simon, B., & Grabow, O. (2011). The politicization of migrants: Further evidence that politicized collective identity is a dual identity. Political Psychology, 31(5), 717738.Google Scholar
Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319331.Google Scholar
Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., et al. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 646665.Google Scholar
Simon, B., & Ruhs, D. (2008). Identity and politicization among Turkish migrants in Germany: The role of dual identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 13541366.Google Scholar
Skitka, L. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 267281.Google Scholar
Skitka, L. J., & Bauman, C. W. (2008). Moral conviction and political engagement. Political Psychology, 29(1), 2954.Google Scholar
Skitka, L. J., Hanson, B. E., & Wisneski, D. C. (2017). Utopian hopes or dystopian fears? Exploring the motivational underpinnings of moralized political engagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(2), 177190.Google Scholar
Skitka, L. J., & Morgan, G. S. (2014). The social and political implications of moral conviction. Political Psychology, 35(S1), 95110.Google Scholar
Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., Goh, D., & Pang, N. (2016). Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review. New Media & Society, 18(9), 18171839.Google Scholar
Smith, L. G., Gavin, J., & Sharp, E. (2015). Social identity formation during the emergence of the Occupy movement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(7), 818832.Google Scholar
Smith, L. G., McGarty, C., & Thomas, E. F. (2018). After Aylan Kurdi: How tweeting about death, threat, and harm predict increased expressions of solidarity with refugees over time. Psychological Science, 29(4), 623634.Google Scholar
Smith, L. G., Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. (2015). ‘We must be the change we want to see in the world’: Integrating norms and identities through social interaction. Political Psychology, 36(5), 543557.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. L., Pratto, F., Bou Zeineddine, F., et al. (2016). International support for the Arab uprisings: Understanding sympathy protests using theories of social identity and social dominance. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19(1), 626.Google Scholar
Stuart, A., Thomas, E. F., & Donaghue, N. (2018). ‘I don’t really want to be associated with the self-righteous left extreme’: Disincentives to participation in collective action. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 6(1), 242270.Google Scholar
Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 5999.Google Scholar
Subašić, E., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 330352.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Worchel, S. & Austin, W. G. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 3347). Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Tausch, N., & Becker, J. C. (2013). Emotional reactions to success and failure of collective action as predictors of future action intentions: A longitudinal investigation in the context of student protests in Germany. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 525542.Google Scholar
Tausch, N., Becker, J., Spears, R., et al. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 129148.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., Bury, S. M., Louis, W. R., et al. (2019). Vegetarian, vegan, activist, radical: Using latent profile analysis to examine different forms of support for animal welfare. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(6), 836857.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., Cary, N., Smith, L. G., Spears, R., & McGarty, C. (2018). The role of social media in shaping solidarity and compassion fade: How the death of a child turned apathy into action but distress took it away. New Media & Society, 20(10), 37783798.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., & Louis, W. R. (2013). Doing democracy: The social psychological mobilization and consequences of collective action. Social Issues and Policy Review, 7(1), 173200.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., & Louis, W. R. (2014). When will collective action be effective? Violent and non-violent protests differentially influence perceptions of legitimacy and efficacy among sympathizers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 263276.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., Mavor, K. I., & McGarty, C. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 7588.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. A. (2009). The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 115134.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. A. (2018). Giving versus acting: Using latent profile analysis to distinguish between benevolent and activist support for global poverty reduction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(1), 189209.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Lala, G., Stuart, A., Hall, L. J., & Goddard, A. (2015). Whatever happened to Kony2012? Understanding a global Internet phenomenon as an emergent social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 356367.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 194218.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2016). Group interaction as the crucible of identity formation: A glimpse at the origins of collective identity and action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19(2), 137151.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Reese, G., Berndsen, M., & Bliuc, A. M. (2016). Where there’s a (collective) will, there are (effective) ways: Integrating individual and group-level factors in explaining humanitarian collective action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(12), 16781692.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., Smith, L. G., McGarty, C., et al. (2019). When and how social movements mobilize action within and across nations to promote solidarity with refugees. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 213229.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., Zubielevitch, E., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2019). Testing the social identity model of collective action longitudinally and across structurally disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(6), 823838.Google Scholar
Torney-Purta, J. (2002). The school’s role in developing civic engagement: A study of adolescents in twenty-eight countries. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 203212.Google Scholar
Tropp, L. R., Hawi, D. R., Van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2012). Cross‐ethnic friendships, perceived discrimination, and their effects on ethnic activism over time: A longitudinal investigation of three ethnic minority groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(2), 257272.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Zomeren, M. (2013). Four core social‐psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(6), 378388.Google Scholar
van Zomeren, M., & Louis, W. R. (2017). Culture meets collective action: Exciting synergies and some lessons to learn for the future. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 20(3), 277284.Google Scholar
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504535.Google Scholar
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2012). On conviction’s collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 5271.Google Scholar
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Bettache, K. (2011). Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality? Extending the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 735753.Google Scholar
van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vestergren, S., Drury, J., & Chiriac, E. H. (2017). The biographical consequences of protest and activism: A systematic review and a new typology. Social Movement Studies, 16(2), 203221.Google Scholar
Wright, S. C. (2009). The next generation of collective action research. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 859879.Google Scholar
Wright, S. C., & Lubensky, M. E. (2009). The struggle for social equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction. In Demoulin, S., Leyens, J., & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 291310). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 9941003.Google Scholar

References

Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth?. The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542555.Google Scholar
Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005, August). The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: Divided they blog. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, 36–43.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K. (2012). Cognitive biases and the strength of political arguments. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 271285.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels?: Partisan news in an age of choice. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, P. M. (2015). How does media choice affect hostile media perceptions? Evidence from participant preference experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(1), 1225.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., & Cryderman, J. (2013). Communication, persuasion, and the conditioning value of selective exposure: Like minds may unite and divide but they mostly tune out. Political Communication, 30(2), 213231.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2013). The effects of need for cognition and need for affect on partisan evaluations. Political Psychology, 34(1), 2342.Google Scholar
Atkeson, L. R., & Maestas, C. D. (2012). Catastrophic politics: How extraordinary events redefine perceptions of government. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., et al. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 92169221.Google Scholar
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 11301132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baum, M. (2003). Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American foreign policy in the new media age. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707731.Google Scholar
Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 2448.Google Scholar
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 619638.Google Scholar
Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235262.Google Scholar
Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2020). Cross-country trends in affective polarization [No. w26669]. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics: Ideology and discontent. In Apter, D. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206261). The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
De Benedictis-Kessner, J., Baum, M. A., Berinsky, A. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2019). Persuading the enemy: Estimating the persuasive effects of partisan media with the preference-incorporating choice and assignment design. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 902916.Google Scholar
Detenber, B., & Reeves, B. (1996). A bio-informational theory of emotion: Motion and image size effects on viewers. Journal of Communication, 46(3), 6684.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame?. Journal of Politics, 63(4), 10411066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E., & Slothuus, R. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 5779.Google Scholar
Dunaway, J., & Searles, K. (2021). News and democratic citizens in the mobile era. Oxford University Press [Manuscript submitted].Google Scholar
Dunaway, J., Searles, K., Sui, M., & Paul, N. (2018). News attention in a mobile era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(2), 107124.Google Scholar
Dunaway, J., & Soroka, S. (2021). Smartphone-size screens constrain cognitive access to video news stories. Information, Communication & Society, 24(1), 6984.Google Scholar
Feezell, J. T. (2018). Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), 482494.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. A., & Pope, J. C. (2008). Polarization in the American public: Misconceptions and misreadings. Journal of Politics, 70(2), 556560.Google Scholar
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298320.Google Scholar
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 17991839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, S., Hofman, J. M., Lahaie, S., Pennock, D. M., & Watts, D. J. (2010). Predicting consumer behavior with Web search. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(41), 1748617490.Google Scholar
Grabe, M. E., Lombard, M., Reich, R. D., Capanella Bracken, C., & Ditton, T. B. (2000). The role of screen size in viewer experiences of media content. Visual Communication Quarterly, 6(2), 49.Google Scholar
Hetherington, M. J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 619631.Google Scholar
Hindman, M. (2018). The internet trap: How the digital economy builds monopolies and undermines democracy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 117.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. (2017). A typology of media effects. In Kenski, K. & Jamieson, K. H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 5968).Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., & Krupenkin, M. (2018). The strengthening of partisan affect. Political Psychology, 39(1), 201218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405431.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690707.Google Scholar
Jamieson, K. H. (2017). Creating the hybrid field of political communication: A five-decade long evolution of the concepts of effects. In Kenski, K. & Jamieson, K. H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 1545). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jurkowitz, M., & Mitchell, A. (2020). An oasis of bipartisanship: Republicans and Democrats distrust social media sites for political and election news. https://www.journalism.org/2020/01/29/an-oasis-of-bipartisanship-republicans-and-democrats-distrust-social-media-sites-for-political-and-election-news/Google Scholar
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. Transaction.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. M., Hsu, J., Neiman, D., et al. (2018). The stealth media? Groups and targets behind divisive issue campaigns on Facebook. Political Communication, 35(4), 515541.Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480498.Google Scholar
Ladd, J. M., & Podkul, A. R. (2020). Sowing distrust of the news media as an electoral strategy. In Grofman, B., Suhay, L., & Trechsel, A. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of electoral persuasion (pp. 427454). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 4670.Google Scholar
Lang, A., Potter, D., & Grabe, M. E. (2003). Making news memorable: Applying theory to the production of local television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(1), 113123.Google Scholar
Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing in election campaigns. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Layman, G. C., & Carsey, T. M. (2002). Party polarization and ‘conflict extension’ in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 786802.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B. R., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lelkes, Y., Sood, G., & Iyengar, S. (2017). The hostile audience: The effect of access to broadband internet on partisan affect. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 520.Google Scholar
Levendusky, M. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levendusky, M. S. (2013a). Why do partisan media polarize viewers?. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 611623.Google Scholar
Levendusky, M. S. (2013b). How partisan media polarize America. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lombard, M., Ditton, T. B., Grabe, M. E., & Reich, R. D. (1997). The role of screen size in viewer responses to television fare. Communication Reports, 10(1), 95106.Google Scholar
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, L. (2016). A cross-cutting calm: How social sorting drives affective polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 351377.Google Scholar
Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mason, L., & Wronski, J. (2018). One tribe to bind them all: How our social group attachments strengthen partisanship. Political Psychology, 39(2), 257277.Google Scholar
Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 10421063.Google Scholar
Molyneux, L. (2017). Mobile news consumption. Digital Journalism, 6(5), 634650.Google Scholar
Munger, K., Gopal, I., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2021). Accessibility and generalizability: Are social media effects moderated by age or digital literacy?. Research & Politics, 8(2).Google Scholar
Nelson, J. L., & Webster, J. G. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media+ Society, 3(3).Google Scholar
Nir, L. (2011). Motivated reasoning and public opinion perception. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 504532.Google Scholar
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin.Google Scholar
Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 18651880.Google Scholar
Peterson, E., Goel, S., & Iyengar, S. (2018). Echo chambers and partisan polarization: Evidence from the 2016 presidential campaign [Unpublished manuscript]. https://5harad.com/papers/selective-exposure.pdfGoogle Scholar
Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 101127.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. The Journal of Politics, 64(4), 10211044.Google Scholar
Reeves, B., Lang, A., Kim, E. Y., & Tatar, D. (1999). The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal. Media Psychology, 1(1), 4967.Google Scholar
Settle, J. E. (2018). Frenemies: How social media polarizes America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Settle, J. E. (2020). Moving beyond sentiment analysis: Social media and emotions in political communication. In Welles, B. F. & González-Bailón, S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of networked communication (pp. 350377). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2017). Political rumoring on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election: Rumor diffusion and correction. New Media & Society, 19(8), 12141235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, S. N. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics: Causes and consequences. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, N. J. (2017). Selective exposure theories. In Kenski, K. & Jamieson, K. H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 531548). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taber, C. (2003). Information processing and public opinion. In Sears, D. O., Huddy, L., & Jervis, R. (Eds.), Handbook of political psychology (pp. 433476). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, K., Garcia, S. M., Schwarz, N., & Miller, D. T. (2007). Inferring the popularity of an opinion from its familiarity: A repetitive voice can sound like a chorus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 821833.Google Scholar
Weeks, B. E. (2015). Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: How anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 699719.Google Scholar
Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental exposure, selective exposure, and political information sharing: Integrating online exposure patterns and expression on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 363379.Google Scholar
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 579616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20(3), 637647.Google Scholar
Adam-Troian, J., Wagner‐Egger, P., Motyl, M., et al. (2020). Investigating the links between cultural values and belief in conspiracy theories: The key roles of collectivism and masculinity. Political Psychology, 42(4), 597618. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12716Google Scholar
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211236.Google Scholar
Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M., & Chuan, Y. (2019). Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research and Politics, 6(2), 18.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W., & Postman, L. (1947). The psychology of rumor. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Anspach, N. M., & Carlson, T. N. (2020). What to believe? Social media commentary and belief in misinformation. Political Behavior, 42(3), 697718.Google Scholar
Appleby, J., & Federico, C. M. (2018). The racialization of electoral fairness in the 2008 and 2012 United States presidential elections. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(7), 979996.Google Scholar
Atkinson, M. D., & DeWitt, D. (2019). The politics of disruption: Social choice theory and conspiracy theory politics. In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 298318). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baden, C., & Sharon, T. (2020). BLINDED BY THE LIES? Toward an integrated definition of conspiracy theories. Communication Theory, 31(1), 82106.Google Scholar
Bartlett, J., & Miller, C. (2010). The power of unreason: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism. Demos.Google Scholar
Basham, L. (2003). Malevolent global conspiracy. Journal of Social Philosophy, 34(1), 91103.Google Scholar
Benegal, S. D., & Scruggs, L. A. (2018). Correcting misinformation about climate change: The impact of partisanship in an experimental setting. Climatic Change, 148(1), 6180.Google Scholar
Bennet, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122139.Google Scholar
Berinsky, A. J. (2015). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241262.Google Scholar
Berinsky, A. J. (2017). Telling the truth about believing the lies? Evidence for the limited prevalence of expressive survey responding. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 211224.Google Scholar
Biddlestone, M., Green, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2020). Cultural orientation, powerlessness, belief in conspiracy theories, and intentions to reduce the spread of COVID-19. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 663673.Google Scholar
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2018). See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Communication, 33(9), 11311140.Google Scholar
Bogart, L. M., & Thorburn, S. (2006). Relationship of African Americans’ socio demographic characteristics to belief in conspiracies about HIV/AIDS and birth control. Journal of the National Medical Association, 98(7), 11441150.Google Scholar
Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2015). Citizens’, scientists’, and policy advisors’ beliefs about global warming. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 271295.Google Scholar
Brotherton, R., French, C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(279), Article 279.Google Scholar
Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(279), Article 225.Google Scholar
Butter, M., & Knight, P. (2019). The history of conspiracy theory research: A review and commentary. In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 3346). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Byford, J., & Billig, M. (2001). The emergence of antisemitic conspiracy theories in Yugoslavia during the war with NATO. Patterns of Prejudice, 35(4), 5063.Google Scholar
Carey, J. M., Chi, V., Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Zeitzoff, T. (2020). The effects of corrective information about disease epidemics and outbreaks: Evidence from Zika and yellow fever in Brazil. Science Advances, 6(5), Article eaaw7449.Google Scholar
Cassese, E. C., Farhart, C. E., & Miller, J. M. (2020). Gender differences in COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs. Politics and Gender, 16(4), 10091018.Google Scholar
Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., & Golec de Zavala, A. (2016). Does self-love or self-hate predict conspiracy beliefs? Narcissism, self-esteem, and the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(2), 157166.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. (2002). Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 32(2), 131150.Google Scholar
Clifford, S., Kim, Y., & Sullivan, B. W. (2019). An improved question format for measuring conspiracy beliefs. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(4), 690722.Google Scholar
Coady, D. (2006). Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate. Ashgate.Google Scholar
Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Broadnax, S., & Blaine, B. E. (1999). Belief in U.S. government conspiracies against blacks among black and white college students: Powerlessness or system blame? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 941953.Google Scholar
Cullen, J. T. (2019). Learning about conspiracy theories: Experiences in science and risk communication with the public about the Fukushima Daiichi disaster. In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 135148). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, J., Wetherell, G., & Henry, P. J. (2018). Social devaluation of African Americans and race-related conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 9991010.Google Scholar
Dentith, M. R. X. (2016). When inferring to a conspiracy might be the best explanation. Social Epistemology, 30(5–6), 572591.Google Scholar
DeWitt, D., Atkinson, M. D., & Wegner, D. (2019). How conspiracy theories spread. In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 319333). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DiFonzo, N. (2019). Conspiracy rumor psychology. In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 257268). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DiFonzo, N., Beckstead, J. W., Stupak, N., & Walders, K. (2016). Validity judgments of rumors heard multiple times: The shape of the truth effect. Social Influence, 11(1), 2239.Google Scholar
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2008). The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana. Journal of Social Psychology, 148(2), 210222.Google Scholar
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J., & Harvey, A. J. (2016). Someone is pulling the strings: Hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(1), 5777.Google Scholar
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538542.Google Scholar
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., et al. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Advances in Political Psychology, 40(1), 335.Google Scholar
Drinkwater, K., Dagnall, N., & Parker, A. (2012). Reality testing, conspiracy theories and paranormal beliefs. Journal of Parapsychology, 76(1), 5777.Google Scholar
Edelson, J., Alduncin, A., Krewson, C., Sieja, J. A., & Uscinski, J. E. (2017). The effects of conspiratorial thinking and motivated reasoning on belief in election fraud. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 933946.Google Scholar
Einstein, K. L., & Glick, D. M. (2015). Do I think BLS data are BS? The consequences of conspiracy theories. Political Behavior, 37, 679701.Google Scholar
Enders, A. M., & Smallpage, S. M. (2019). Polls, plots, and party politics: Conspiracy theories in contemporary America. In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 298318). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enders, A. M., Smallpage, S. M., & Lupton, R. N. (2020). Are all ‘Birthers’ conspiracy theorists? On the relationship between conspiratorial thinking and political orientations. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 849866.Google Scholar
Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C., & Stoler, J. (2020). The different forms of COVID-19 misinformation and their consequences. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-48Google Scholar
Farhart, C. E., Miller, J. M., & Saunders, K. L. (2021). Conspiracy stress or relief? Learned helplessness and conspiratorial thinking. In Barker, D. & Suhay, E. (Eds.), The politics of truth in polarized America (pp. 223256). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Federico, C. M., Williams, A. L., & Vitriol, J. A. (2018). The role of system identity threat in conspiracy theory endorsement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 927938.Google Scholar
Fekete, L. (2012). The Muslim conspiracy theory and the Oslo massacre. Race and Class, 53(3), 3047.Google Scholar
Filer, T. (2019). The hidden and the revealed: Styles of political conspiracy theory in Kirchnerism. In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 395407). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Advances in Political Psychology, 38(1), 127150.Google Scholar
Fowler, E. F., & Gollust, S. E. (2015). The content and effect of politicized health controversies. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 155171.Google Scholar
Franks, B., Bangerter, A., Bauer, M. W., Hall, M., & Noort, M. C. (2017). Beyond ‘monologicality’? Exploring conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(861).Google Scholar
Freeman, D., & Bentall, R. P. (2017). The concomitants of conspiracy concerns. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 52(5), 595604.Google Scholar
Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 957974.Google Scholar
Galliford, N., & Furnham, A. (2017). Individual difference factors and beliefs in medical and political conspiracy theories. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(5), 422428.Google Scholar
Gentzkow, M. A., & Shapiro, J. M. (2004). Media, education and anti-Americanism in the Muslim world. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 117133.Google Scholar
Georgiou, N., Delfabbro, P., & Balzanb, R. (2020). COVID-19-related conspiracy beliefs and their relationship with perceived stress and pre-existing conspiracy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, Article 110201.Google Scholar
Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15(4), 731742.Google Scholar
Goertzel, T. (2010). Conspiracy theories in science. EMBO Reports, 11(7), 493499.Google Scholar
Golec de Zavala, A., & Federico, C. M. (2018). Collective narcissism and the growth of conspiracy thinking over the course of the 2016 United States presidential election: A longitudinal analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 10111018.Google Scholar
Golec de Zavala, A., & Lantos, D. (2020). Collective narcissism and its social consequences: The bad and the ugly. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 273278.Google Scholar
Green, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Anxious attachment and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 3037.Google Scholar
Greenhill, K. M., & Oppenheim, B. (2017). Rumor has it: The adoption of unverified information in conflict zones. International Studies Quarterly, 61(3), 660676.Google Scholar
Grimes, D. R. (2016). On the viability of conspiratorial beliefs. PLoS ONE, 11(3), Article e0151003.Google Scholar
Grzesiak-Feldman, M. (2013). The effect of high-anxiety situations on conspiracy thinking. Current Psychology, 32(1), 100118.Google Scholar
Grzesiak-Feldman, M. (2015). Are the high authoritarians more prone to adopt conspiracy theories? The role of right-wing authoritarianism in conspiratorial thinking. In Bilewicz, M., Cichocka, A., & Soral, W. (Eds.), The psychology of conspiracy (pp. 99121). Routledge.Google Scholar
Grzesiak-Feldman, M., & Ejsmont, A. (2008). Paranoia and conspiracy thinking of Jews, Arabs, Germans, and Russians in a Polish sample. Psychological Report, 102(3), 884886.Google Scholar
Guess, A., Lockett, D., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020). ‘Fake news’ may have limited effects beyond increasing beliefs in false claims. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-004Google Scholar
Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020). Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 472480.Google Scholar
Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2017). I am not a conspiracy theorist: Relational identifications in the Dutch conspiracy milieu. Cultural Sociology, 11(1), 113129.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, R. (1964). The paranoid style in American politics and other essays. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un-) truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 2543.Google Scholar
Imhoff, R., Dieterle, L., & Lamberty, P. (2021). Resolving the puzzle of conspiracy worldview and political activism: Belief in secret plots decreases normative but increases nonnormative political engagement. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 7179.Google Scholar
Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. (2020). A bioweapon or a hoax? The link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(8), 11101118.Google Scholar
Jardina, A., & Traugott, M. (2019). The genesis of the birther rumor: Partisanship, racial attitudes, and political knowledge. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics, 4(1), 6080.Google Scholar
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014a). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 3556.Google Scholar
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014b). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS ONE, 9(2), Article e89177.Google Scholar
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Prevention is better than cure: Addressing anti-vaccine conspiracy theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(8), 459469.Google Scholar
Jolley, D., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2018). Blaming a few bad apples to save a threatened barrel: The system-justifying function of conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 39(2), 465478.Google Scholar
Jolley, D., Meleady, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2020). Exposure to intergroup conspiracy theories promotes prejudice which spreads across groups. British Journal of Psychology, 111(1), 1735.Google Scholar
Jolley, D., & Paterson, J. L. (2020). Pylons ablaze: Examining the role of 5G COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and support for violence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 628640.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., & Hardin, C. D. (2018). Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 7783.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 407424.Google Scholar
Karp, J. A., Nai, A., & Norris, P. (2018). Dial ‘F’ for fraud: Explaining citizens suspicions about elections. Electoral Studies, 53, 1119.Google Scholar
Keeley, B. L. (1999). Of conspiracy theories. Journal of Philosophy, 96(3), 109126.Google Scholar
Klein, C., Clutton, P., & Dunn, A. G. (2018). Pathways to conspiracy: The social and linguistic precursors of involvement in Reddit’s conspiracy theory forum. PLoS ONE, 14(11), Article e0225098.Google Scholar
Knight, P. (2000). Conspiracy culture: From the Kennedy assassination to the X-Files. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kofta, M., & Sędek, G. (2005). Conspiracy stereotypes of Jews during systemic transformation in Poland. International Journal of Sociology, 35(1), 4064.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A., Malhotra, N., & Mittal, U. (2014). Public misunderstanding of political facts: How question wording affected estimates of partisan differences in birtherism. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1), 147165.Google Scholar
Krouwel, A., Kutiyski, Y., van Prooijen, J.-W., Martinsson, J., & Markstedt, E. (2017). Does extreme political ideology predict conspiracy beliefs, economic evaluations and political trust? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(2), 435462.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790816.Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480498.Google Scholar
Laine, E. E., & Parakkal, R. (2017). National security, personal insecurity, and political conspiracies: The persistence of Americans’ beliefs in 9/11 conspiracy theories. IUP Journal of International Relations, 11, 1641.Google Scholar
Lantian, A., Muller, D., Nurra, C., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: Validation of a French and English single-item scale. International Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 114.Google Scholar
Lantian, A., Muller, D., Nurra, C., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). ‘I know things they don’t know!’ The role of need for uniqueness in belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychology, 48(3), 160173.Google Scholar
Lantian, A., Muller, D., Nurra, C., Klein, O., Berjot, S., & Pantazi, M. (2018). Stigmatized beliefs: Conspiracy theories, anticipated negative evaluation of the self, and fear of social exclusion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 939954.Google Scholar
Leman, P. J., & Cinnirella, M. (2013). Beliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(378).Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S. (2019). In whose hands the future? In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 149177). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Oberauer, K., Brophy, S., Lloyd, E. A., & Marriott, M. (2015). Recurrent fury: Conspiratorial discourse in the blogosphere triggered by research on the role of conspiracist ideation in climate denial. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 142178.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M. Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106131.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLoS ONE, 8(10), Article e75637.Google Scholar
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lunz Trujillo, K., Motta, M., Callaghan, T., & Sylvester, S. (2020). Correcting misperceptions about the MMR vaccine: Using psychological risk factors to inform targeted communication strategies. Political Research Quarterly, 74(2), 464478.Google Scholar
Lyons, B., Merola, V., & Reifler, J. (2019). Not just asking questions: Effects of implicit and explicit conspiracy information about vaccines and genetic modification. Health Communication, 34(14), 17411750.Google Scholar
Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., & Kossowska, M. (2018). Addicted to answers: Need for cognitive closure and the endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 109117.Google Scholar
Marinthe, G., Brown, G., Delouvée, S., & Jolley, D. (2020). Looking out for myself: Exploring the relationship between conspiracy mentality, perceived personal risk, and COVID‐19 prevention measures. British Journal of Health Psychology, 25(4), 957980.Google Scholar
Mashuri, A., & Zaduqisti, E. (2014). We believe in your conspiracy if we distrust you: The role of intergroup distrust in structuring the effect of Islamic identification, competitive victimhood, and group incompatibility on belief in a conspiracy theory. Journal of Tropical Psychology, 4(11), 114.Google Scholar
Mashuri, A., & Zaduqisti, E. (2015). The effect of intergroup threat and social identity salience on the belief in conspiracy theories over terrorism in Indonesia: Collective angst as a mediator. International Journal of Psychological Research, 8(1), 2435.Google Scholar
Mays, V. M., Coles, C. N., & Cochran, S. D. (2012). Is there a legacy of the U.S. public health syphilis study at Tuskegee in HIV/AIDS-related beliefs among heterosexual African Americans and Latinos? Ethics & Behavior, 22(6), 461471.Google Scholar
McClosky, H., & Chong, D. (1985). Similarities and differences between left-wing and right-wing radicals. British Journal of Political Science, 15(3), 329363.Google Scholar
McHoskey, J. W. (1995). Case closed? On the John F. Kennedy assassination: Biased assimilation of evidence and attitude polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(3), 395409.Google Scholar
McKenzie-McHarg, A. (2019). Conspiracy theory: The nineteenth-century prehistory of a twentieth-century concept. In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 6281). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. M. (2020a). Do COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs form a monological belief system? Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 53(2), 319326.Google Scholar
Miller, J. M. (2020b). Psychological and situational factors combine to boost COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 53(2), 327334.Google Scholar
Miller, J. M., Farhart, C. E., & Saunders, K. L. (2018). Why do people share conspiracy theories? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824844.Google Scholar
Moore, A. (2016). Conspiracy and conspiracy theories in democratic politics. Critical Review, 28(1), 123.Google Scholar
Motta, M., Callaghan, T., & Sylvester, S. (2018). Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning-Kruger effects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes. Social Science & Medicine, 211, 274281.Google Scholar
Motta, M., Stecuła, D., & Farhart, C. (2020). How right-leaning media coverage of COVID-19 facilitated the spread of misinformation in the early stages of the pandemic in the U.S. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne De Science Politique, 53(2), 335342.Google Scholar
Nattrass, N. (2013). The AIDS conspiracy: Science fights back. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nefes, T. S. (2015a). Scrutinizing impacts of conspiracy theories on readers’ political views: A rational choice perspective on anti-Semitic rhetoric in Turkey. British Journal of Sociology, 66(3), 557575.Google Scholar
Nefes, T. S. (2015b). Understanding the anti-Semitic rhetoric in Turkey through the Sevres syndrome. Turkish Studies, 16(4), 572587.Google Scholar
Nefes, T. S. (2019). The conspiratorial style in Turkish politics: Discussing the deep state in the parliament. In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 385394). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nisbet, E. C., Cooper, K. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2015). The partisan brain: How dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis)trust science. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 3666.Google Scholar
Nyhan, B. (2010). Why the ‘death panel’ myth wouldn’t die: Misinformation in the health care reform debate. The Forum, 8(1).Google Scholar
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303330.Google Scholar
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2015). The effect of fact‐checking on elites: A field experiment on U.S. state legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 628640.Google Scholar
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2019). The roles of information deficits and identity threat in the prevalence of misperceptions. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 29(2), 222244.Google Scholar
Nyhan, B., & Zeitzoff, T. (2018). Conspiracy and misperception belief in the Middle East and North Africa. Journal of Politics, 80(4), 14001404.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014a). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952966.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014b). Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(5), 817818.Google Scholar
Onderco, M., & Stoeckel, F. (2020). Conspiratorial thinking and foreign policy views: Evidence from Central Europe. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2020.1814309Google Scholar
Orr, M., & Husting, G. (2019). Media marginalization of racial minorities: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ in U.S. ghettos and on the ‘Arab Street’. In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 8293). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palm, R., Bolsen, T., & Kingsland, J. T. (2021). The effect of frames on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.04.21249241Google Scholar
Parsons, S., Simmons, W., Shinhoster, F., & Kilburn, J. (1999). A test of the grapevine: An empirical examination of the conspiracy theories among African Americans. Sociological Spectrum, 19(2), 201222.Google Scholar
Pasek, J. (2019). Don’t trust the scientists! Rejecting the scientific consensus ‘conspiracy’. In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 201213). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pasek, J., Stark, T. H., Krosnick, J. A., & Tompson, T. (2015). What motivates a conspiracy theory? Birther beliefs, partisanship, liberal-conservative ideology, and anti-black attitudes. Electoral Studies, 40, 482489.Google Scholar
Pasquetto, I. V., Swire-Thompson, B., Amazeen, M. A., et al. (2020). Tackling misinformation: What researchers could do with social media data. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-49Google Scholar
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. (2021). Research note: Examining false beliefs about voter fraud in the wake of the 2020 Presidential Election. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-51Google Scholar
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Bago, B., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Predictors of attitudes and misperceptions about COVID-19 in Canada, the U.K., and the U.S.A. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zhjkpCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological Science, 31(7), 770780.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Osmundsen, M., & Arceneaux, K. (2018). The ‘need for chaos’ and motivations to share hostile political rumors. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6m4tsGoogle Scholar
Pigden, C. (1995). Popper revisited, or what is wrong with conspiracy theories? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 25(1), 334.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1972). Conjectures and refutations. Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Poulsen, S., & Young, D. G. (2018). A history of fact checking in U.S. politics and election contexts. In Southwell, B. G., Thorson, E. A., & Sheble, L. (Eds.), Misinformation and mass audiences (pp. 232248). University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Prior, M., Sood, G., & Khanna, K. (2015). You cannot be serious: The impact of accuracy incentives on partisan bias in reports of economic perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 489518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, S. C., Jamison, A. M., An, J., Hancock, G. R., & Freimuth, V. S. (2019). Measuring vaccine hesitancy, confidence, trust and flu vaccine uptake: Results of a national survey of White and African American adults. Vaccine, 37(9), 11681173.Google Scholar
Raab, M. H., Ortlieb, S. A., Auer, N., Guthmann, K., & Carbon, C.-C. (2013). Thirty shades of truth: Conspiracy theories as stories of individuation, not of pathological delusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(406).Google Scholar
Radnitz, S., & Underwood, P. (2017). Is belief in conspiracy theories pathological? A survey experiment on the cognitive roots of extreme suspicion. British Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 113129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2020). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. Social Science & Medicine, 263, Article 113356.Google Scholar
Roozenbeek, J., van der Linden, S., & Nygren, T. (2020). Prebunking interventions based on ‘inoculation’ theory can reduce susceptibility to misinformation across cultures. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016//mr-2020-008Google Scholar
Rottweiler, B., & Gill, P. (2020). Conspiracy beliefs and violent extremist intentions: The contingent effects of self-efficacy, self-control and law-related morality. Terrorism and Political Violence. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2020.1803288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapountzis, A., & Condor, S. (2013). Conspiracy accounts as intergroup theories: Challenging dominant understandings of social power and political legitimacy. Political Psychology, 43(5), 731752.Google Scholar
Saunders, K. L. (2017). The impact of elite frames and motivated reasoning on beliefs in a global warming conspiracy: The promise and limits of trust. Research and Politics, 4(3), 19.Google Scholar
Sell, T. K., Hosangadi, D., & Trotochaud, M. (2020). Misinformation and the US Ebola communication crisis: Analyzing the veracity and content of social media messages related to a fear-inducing infectious disease outbreak. BMC Public Health, 20(1), Article 550.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, N. (2020). Who do you believe? Political parties and conspiracy theories in Pakistan. Party Politics, 26(2), 107119.Google Scholar
Simmons, W. P., & Parsons, S. (2005). Beliefs in conspiracy theories among African Americans: A comparison of elites and masses. Social Science Quarterly, 86(3), 582598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smallpage, S. M. (2019). Conspiracy thinking, tolerance, and democracy. In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 187200). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smallpage, S. M., Enders, A. M., & Uscinski, J. E. (2017). The partisan contours of conspiracy theory beliefs. Research and Politics, 4(4), 17.Google Scholar
Southwell, B. G., Thorson, E. A., & Sheble, L. (2018). Introduction: Misinformation among mass audiences as a focus for inquiry. In Southwell, B. G., Thorson, E. A., & Sheble, L. (Eds.), Misinformation and mass audiences (pp. 111). University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Spinney, L. (2019). In Congo, fighting a virus and a groundswell of fake news. Science, 363(6424), 213214.Google Scholar
Stecuła, D. A., Kuru, O., & Jamieson, K. H. (2020). How trust in experts and media use affect acceptance of common anti-vaccination claims. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-007Google Scholar
Stein, R., Swann, A. B., & Sarraf, M. (2020). Hearing from both sides: Differences between liberal and conservative attitudes toward scientific and experiential evidence. Political Psychology, 42(3), 443461.Google Scholar
Suhay, E., & Druckman, J. N. (2015). The politics of science: Political values and the production, communication, and reception of scientific knowledge. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 615.Google Scholar
Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2010). An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 434449.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2009). On rumors: How falsehoods spread, why we believe them, what can be done. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Conspiracy theories and other dangerous ideas. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202227.Google Scholar
Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. (2014). Examining the monological nature of conspiracy theories. In van Prooijen, J.-W. & van Lange, P. A. M. (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 254272). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swami, V. (2012). Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: The case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(280).Google Scholar
Swami, V., Barron, D., Weis, L., & Furnham, A. (2018). To Brexit or not to Brexit: The roles of Islamophobia, conspiracist beliefs, and integrated threat in voting intentions for the United Kingdom European Union Membership Referendum. British Journal of Psychology, 109(1), 156179.Google Scholar
Swami, V., Barron, D., Weis, L., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., & Furnham, A. (2017). An examination of the factorial and convergent validity of four measures of conspiracist ideation, with recommendations for researchers. PLoS ONE, 12(2), Article e0172617.Google Scholar
Swami, V., & Coles, R. (2010). The truth is out there: Belief in conspiracy theories. The Psychologist, 23(7), 560563.Google Scholar
Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., et al. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious CTs. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 443463.Google Scholar
Swami, V., Furnham, A., Smyth, N., Weis, L., Lay, A., & Clow, A. (2016). Putting the stress on CTs: Examining associations between psychological stress, anxiety, and belief in CTs. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 7276.Google Scholar
Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133(3), 572585.Google Scholar
Swire, B., & Ecker, U. (2018). Misinformation and its correction: Cognitive mechanisms and recommendations for mass communication. In Southwell, B. G., Thorson, E. A., & Sheble, L. (Eds.), Misinformation and mass audiences (pp. 195211). University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. B., & Quinn, S. C. (1991). The Tuskegee syphilis study, 1932 to 1972: Implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education programs in the Black community. American Journal of Public Health, 81(11), 14981505.Google Scholar
Thorburn, S., & Bogart, L. M. (2005). Conspiracy beliefs about birth control: Barriers to pregnancy prevention among African Americans of reproductive age. Health Education and Behavior, 32(4), 474487.Google Scholar
Thorson, E. A. (2015). Belief echoes: The persistent effects of misinformation and corrections. Political Communication, 33(3), 121.Google Scholar
Thorson, E. A. (2018). Comparing approaches to journalistic fact checking. In Southwell, B. G., Thorson, E. A., & Sheble, L. (Eds.), Misinformation and mass audiences (pp. 249262). University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Uscinski, J. E. (2019). Down the rabbit hole we go! In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 132). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Uscinski, J. E., Douglas, K. M., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017). Climate change conspiracy theories. Climate Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.328Google Scholar
Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., & Klofstad, C. M., et al. (2020). Why do people believe COVID- 19 conspiracy theories? The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-015Google Scholar
Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C., & Atkinson, M. D. (2016). What drives conspiratorial beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 5771.Google Scholar
Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, J. J., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., et al. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 460471.Google Scholar
van der Linden, S. (2013). What a hoax: Why people believe in conspiracy theories. Scientific American Mind, 24(4), 4143.Google Scholar
van der Linden, S. (2015). The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 171173.Google Scholar
van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The paranoid style in American politics revisited: An ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking. Political Psychology, 42(1), 2351.Google Scholar
van der Wal, R. C., Sutton, R. M., Lange, J., & Braga, J. P. N. (2018). Suspicious binds: Conspiracy thinking and tenuous perceptions of causal connections between co-occurring and spuriously correlated events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 970989.Google Scholar
van Prooijen, J.-W. (2017). Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 5058.Google Scholar
van Prooijen, J.-W., & Acker, M. (2015). The influence of control on belief in conspiracy theories: Conceptual and applied extensions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(5), 753761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323333.Google Scholar
van Prooijen, J.-W., Douglas, K. M., & De Inocencio, C. (2018). Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 320335.Google Scholar
van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., & Pollet, T. V. (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 570578.Google Scholar
van Prooijen, J.-W., & Song, M. (2020). The cultural dimension of intergroup conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 112(2), 455473.Google Scholar
van Prooijen, J.-W., & van Vugt, M. (2018). Conspiracy theories: Evolved functions and psychological mechanisms. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 770788.Google Scholar
Walker, J. (2019). What we mean when we say ‘conspiracy theory’. In Uscinski, J. E. (Ed.), Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them (pp. 5361). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waters, A. M. (1997). Conspiracy theories as ethnosociologies: Explanation and intention in African American political culture. Journal of Black Studies, 28(1), 112125.Google Scholar
Weigmann, K. (2018). The genesis of a conspiracy theory: Why do people believe in scientific conspiracy theories and how do they spread? EMBO Reports, 19, Article e45935.Google Scholar
Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322(5898), 115117.Google Scholar
Wood, M. J. (2016). Some dare call it conspiracy: Labelling something a conspiracy theory does not reduce belief in it. Political Psychology, 37(5), 695705.Google Scholar
Wood, M. J. (2017). Conspiracy suspicions as a proxy for beliefs in conspiracy theories: Implications for theory and measurement. British Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 507527.Google Scholar
Wood, M. J. (2018). Propagating and debunking conspiracy theories on Twitter during the 2015–2016 Zika virus outbreak. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(8), 485490.Google Scholar
Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767773.Google Scholar
Wood, M. J., & Gray, D. (2019). Right-wing authoritarianism as a predictor of pro-establishment versus anti-establishment conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 138(1), 163166.Google Scholar
Yablokov, I. (2018). Fortress Russia: Conspiracy theories in the post-Soviet world. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Zonis, M., & Joseph, C. M. (1994). Conspiracy thinking in the Middle East. Political Psychology, 15(3), 443445.Google Scholar

References

Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2013). Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 17731785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.029Google Scholar
Alló, M., & Loureiro, M. L. (2014). The role of social norms on preferences towards climate change policies: A meta-analysis. Energy Policy, 73, 563574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.042Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2020, 6 February). Majority of US adults believe climate change is most important issue today [Press release]. http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2020/02/climate-changeGoogle Scholar
Anderegg, W. R. L., & Goldsmith, G. R. (2014). Public interest in climate change over the past decade and the effects of the ‘climategate’ media event. Environmental Research Letters, 9(5), Article 054005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/5/054005Google Scholar
Antonio, R. J., & Brulle, R. J. (2011). The unbearable lightness of politics: Climate change denial and political polarization. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 195202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01199.xGoogle Scholar
Atkin, E. (2018, 21 August). Germany has proven the modern automobile must die. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/germany-proves-cars-must-die/Google Scholar
Attari, S. Z., Krantz, D. H., & Weber, E. U. (2019). Climate change communicators’ carbon footprints affect their audience’s policy support. Climatic Change, 154(3–4), 529545. https://doi.org/10/ggnkr7Google Scholar
Attari, S. Z., Schoen, M., Davidson, C. I., et al. (2009). Preferences for change: Do individuals prefer voluntary actions, soft regulations, or hard regulations to decrease fossil fuel consumption? Ecological Economics, 68(6), 17011710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.007Google Scholar
Atwater, T., Salwen, M. B., & Anderson, R. B. (1985). Media agenda-setting with environmental issues. Journalism Quarterly, 62(2), 393397. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908506200227Google Scholar
Bales, S. N., Sweetland, J., & Volmert, A. (2015). How to talk about climate change and the ocean: A FrameWorks message memo. FrameWorks Institute. http://www.frameworksinstitute.org/assets/files/PDF_oceansclimate/climatechangeandtheocean_mm_final_2015.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ballew, M. T., Pearson, A. R., Goldberg, M. H., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2020). Does socioeconomic status moderate the political divide on climate change? The roles of education, income, and individualism. Global Environmental Change, 60, Article 102024. https://doi.org/10/ggf2xvGoogle Scholar
Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A., Goldberg, M. H., et al. (2020). Beliefs about others’ global warming beliefs: The role of party affiliation and opinion deviance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 70, Article 101466. https://doi.org/10/gg4t6fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloodhart, B., Maibach, E., Myers, T., & Zhao, X. (2015). Local climate experts: The influence of local TV weather information on climate change perceptions. PLoS ONE, 10(11), Article e0141526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141526Google Scholar
Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2018). Do partisanship and politicization undermine the impact of a scientific consensus message about climate change? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(3), 389402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217737855Google Scholar
Boykoff, M. T., & Mansfield, M. (2008). `Ye olde hot aire’: Reporting on human contributions to climate change in the UK tabloid press. Environmental Research Letters, 3(2), Article 024002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/024002Google Scholar
Boykoff, M. T., & Roberts, J. T. (2007). Media coverage of climate change: Current trends, strengths, weaknesses (No. 3; Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world, p. 54). United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
Bragg, B., Galloway, T., Spohn, D. B., & Trotter, D. E. (2003). Land use and zoning for the public’s health. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31(4), 7880. https://doi.org/10/bcst6kGoogle Scholar
Briseno, A. (2017). American’s attitudes about science and scientists in 2017. Research America. https://www.researchamerica.org/sites/default/files/Americans%27%20Attitudes%20about%20Science%20and%20Scientists%20in%202017.pdfGoogle Scholar
Brüggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2017). Beyond false balance: How interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 42, 5867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.004Google Scholar
Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J., & Jenkins, J. C. (2012). Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010. Climatic Change, 114(2), 169188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0403-yGoogle Scholar
Campbell, T. H., & Kay, A. C. (2014). Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 809824. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037963Google Scholar
Capstick, S., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., & Upham, P. (2015). International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. WIREs Climate Change, 6(1), 3561. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.321Google Scholar
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752Google Scholar
Choi, S., Niyogi, D., Shepardson, D. P., & Charusombat, U. (2010). Do earth and environmental science textbooks promote middle and high school students’ conceptual development about climate change? Textbooks’ consideration of students’ misconceptions. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91(7), 889898. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2625.1Google Scholar
Clark, B., & York, R. (2005). Carbon metabolism: Global capitalism, climate change, and the biospheric rift. Theory and Society, 34(4), 391428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-005-1993-4Google Scholar
Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 808822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808Google Scholar
Cook, J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2011). The debunking handbook: Now freely available for download. University of Queensland. https://www.skepticalscience.com/Debunking-Handbook-now-freely-available-download.htmlGoogle Scholar
Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017a). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS ONE, 12(5), Article e0175799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799Google Scholar
Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017b). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS ONE, 12(5), Article e0175799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799Google Scholar
Corner, A., Parkhill, K., Pidgeon, N., & Vaughan, N. E. (2013). Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 938947. https://doi.org/10/f5kbn5Google Scholar
Corner, A., Whitmarsh, L., & Xenias, D. (2012). Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate change: Biased assimilation and attitude polarisation. Climatic Change, 114(3–4), 463478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0424-6Google Scholar
Cummings, C. L., Lin, S. H., & Trump, B. D. (2017). Public perceptions of climate geoengineering: A systematic review of the literature. Climate Research, 73(3), 247264. https://doi.org/10/gbzw7dGoogle Scholar
Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4 Pt. 1), 377383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589Google Scholar
Devine-Wright, P., & Howes, Y. (2010). Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 271280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.008Google Scholar
Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(44), 1845218456. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908738106Google Scholar
Drews, S., & Van den Bergh, J. C. (2016). What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate Policy, 16(7), 855876. https://doi.org/10/gg4t8pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecker, U. K., Butler, L. H., Cook, J., Hurlstone, M. J., Kurz, T., & Lewandowsky, S. (2020). Using the COVID-19 economic crisis to frame climate change as a secondary issue reduces mitigation support. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 70, Article 101464. https://doi.org/10/gg58bdGoogle Scholar
Ehret, P. J., Van Boven, L., & Sherman, D. K. (2018). Partisan barriers to bipartisanship: Understanding climate policy polarization. Social Psychological and Personality Science, Article 1948550618758709. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618758709Google Scholar
Ferguson, M. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 135142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.010Google Scholar
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24(1), 5662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612449177Google Scholar
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of ‘system-sanctioned change’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 326338. https://doi.org/10/bjtrkkGoogle Scholar
Fiske, S. T. (2009). Social beings: Core motives in social psychology. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Fosu-Mensah, B. Y., Vlek, P. L., & MacCarthy, D. S. (2012). Farmers’ perception and adaptation to climate change: A case study of Sekyedumase district in Ghana. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(4), 495505. https://doi.org/10/gg56z9Google Scholar
Geiger, N. (2020). Do people actually ‘listen to the experts’? A cautionary note on assuming expert persuasiveness on strategic science communication. Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1862449Google Scholar
Geiger, N., Sarge, M., & Comfort, R. (2021). An examination of expertise, caring and salient value similarity as source factors that garner support for advocated climate policies. Preprint available at https://osf.io/3yt8u/Google Scholar
Geiger, N., McLaughlin, B., & Velez, J. (2021). Not all boomers: Temporal orientation explains inter- and intra-cultural variability in the link between age and climate engagement. Climatic Change, 166(1), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03116-xGoogle Scholar
Geiger, N., Pasek, M. H., Gruszczynski, M., Ratcliff, N. J., & Weaver, K. S. (2020). Political ingroup conformity and pro-environmental behavior: Evaluating the evidence from a survey and mousetracking experiments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, Article 101524. https://doi.org/10/ghh65gGoogle Scholar
Geiger, N., & Swim, J. K. (2016). Climate of silence: Pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 7990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.002Google Scholar
Geiger, N., Swim, J. K., & Fraser, J. (2017). Creating a climate for change: Interventions, efficacy and public discussion about climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 104116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.010Google Scholar
Geiger, N., Swim, J. K., Fraser, J., & Flinner, K. (2017). Catalyzing public engagement with climate change through informal science learning centers. Science Communication, 39(2), 221249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017697980Google Scholar
Geiger, N., Swim, J. K., & Glenna, L. L. (2019). Spread the green word: A social community perspective into environmentally sustainable behavior. Environment and Behavior, 51(5), 561589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518812925Google Scholar
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019). Discussing global warming leads to greater acceptance of climate science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(30), 1480414805. https://doi.org/10/gf4q5bGoogle Scholar
Graça, J. (2020). Opposition to immigration and (anti‐)environmentalism: An application and extension of the social dominance‐environmentalism nexus with 21 countries in Europe. Applied Psychology, 70(2), 905928. https://doi.org/10/gg58bcGoogle Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 10291046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141Google Scholar
Guber, D. L. (2013). A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(1), 93115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212463361Google Scholar
Gustafson, A., Rosenthal, S. A., Ballew, M. T., et al. (2019). The development of partisan polarization over the Green New Deal. Nature Climate Change, 9(12), 940944. https://doi.org/10/ggkd9dGoogle Scholar
Häkkinen, K., & Akrami, N. (2014). Ideology and climate change denial. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 6265. https://doi.org/10/f244rfGoogle Scholar
Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2014). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies (578192014-270) [Data set]. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/e578192014Google Scholar
Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 555588. http://dx.doi.org.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/10.1037/a0015701Google Scholar
Hawken, P. (2017). Drawdown: The most comprehensive plan ever proposed to reverse global warming. Penguin.Google Scholar
Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior, 38(1), 4871. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505277998Google Scholar
Hennes, E. P., Ruisch, B. C., Feygina, I., Monteiro, C. A., & Jost, J. T. (2016). Motivated recall in the service of the economic system: The case of anthropogenic climate change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(6), 755771. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000148Google Scholar
Hoffarth, M. R., & Hodson, G. (2016). Green on the outside, red on the inside: Perceived environmentalist threat as a factor explaining political polarization of climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 4049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.002Google Scholar
Hornsey, M. J., & Fielding, K. S. (2017). Attitude roots and Jiu Jitsu persuasion: Understanding and overcoming the motivated rejection of science. American Psychologist, 72(5), 459473. https://doi.org/10/gbqsfzGoogle Scholar
Hurlstone, M. J., Price, A., Wang, S., Leviston, Z., & Walker, I. (2020). Activating the legacy motive mitigates intergenerational discounting in the climate game. Global Environmental Change, 60, Article 102008. https://doi.org/10/ggpbqwGoogle Scholar
Incropera, F. P. (2016). Climate change: A wicked problem: Complexity and uncertainty at the intersection of science, economics, politics, and human behavior. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacquet, J., Dietrich, M., & Jost, J. T. (2014). The ideological divide and climate change opinion: ‘Top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10/gdxw32Google Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Ripberger, J. T., Silva, C. L., et al. (2020). Partisan asymmetry in temporal stability of climate change beliefs. Nature Climate Change, 10, 322328. https://doi.org/10/ggn4dtGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167208. https://doi.org/10/ggmpfrGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T., Sterling, J., & Stern, C. (2017). Getting closure on conservatism, or the politics of epistemic and existential motivation. In Kopetz, C. E. & Fishbach, A. (Eds.), The motivation-cognition interface: From the lab to the real world – A festschrift in honor of Arie W. Kruglanski (pp. 5687). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., Tarantola, T., Silva, C. L., & Braman, D. (2015). Geoengineering and climate change polarization: Testing a two-channel model of science communication. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 192222. https://doi.org/10/f62vsxGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., et al. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2(10), 732735. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547Google Scholar
Kasser, T., Cohn, S., Kanner, A. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2007). Some costs of American corporate capitalism: A psychological exploration of value and goal conflicts. Psychological Inquiry, 18(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701386579Google Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. (2009). Psychological science’s contributions to a sustainable environment: Extending our reach to a grand challenge of society. American Psychologist, 64(5), 339356. https://doi.org/10/c4mbpvGoogle Scholar
Kotcher, J. E., Myers, T. A., Vraga, E. K., Stenhouse, N., & Maibach, E. W. (2017). Does engagement in advocacy hurt the credibility of scientists? Results from a randomized national survey experiment. Environmental Communication, 11(3), 415429. https://doi.org/10/gg4dg4Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., Orehek, E., Dechesne, M., & Pierro, A. (2010). Lay epistemic theory: The motivational, cognitive, and social aspects of knowledge formation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(10), 939950. https://doi.org/10/c74n6pGoogle Scholar
Lawson, D. F., Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Carrier, S. J., Strnad, R. L., & Seekamp, E. (2019). Children can foster climate change concern among their parents. Nature Climate Change, 9(6), 458462. https://doi.org/10/gf2j7tGoogle Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., et al. (2019). Climate activism: Beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors, November 2019. Yale University and George Mason University. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/global-warming-activism-november-2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
Leviston, Z., Walker, I., & Morwinski, S. (2013). Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 334337. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1743Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018Google Scholar
Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., Roser-Renouf, C., & Cutler, M. (2016). Is there a climate ‘spiral of silence’ in America: March, 2016. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Climate-Spiral-Silence-March-2016.pdfGoogle Scholar
Malka, A., Krosnick, J. A., & Langer, G. (2009). The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Analysis, 29(5), 633647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.xGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, E. M., & Shariff, A. F. (2012). Climate change and moral judgement. Nature Climate Change, 2(4), 243247. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1378Google Scholar
Mason, L. (2018). Ideologues without issues: The polarizing consequences of ideological identities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 866877. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy005Google Scholar
McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Polity.Google Scholar
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2010). Anti-reflexivity: The American conservative movements success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 100133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409356001Google Scholar
Meleady, R., Crisp, R. J., Dhont, K., Hopthrow, T., & Turner, R. N. (2020). Intergroup contact, social dominance, and environmental concern: A test of the cognitive-liberalization hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(6), 11461164. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000196Google Scholar
Merkley, E., & Stecula, D. A. (2018). Party elites or manufactured doubt? The informational context of climate change polarization. Science Communication, 40(2), 258274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018760334Google Scholar
Mildenberger, M., & Tingley, D. (2017). Beliefs about climate beliefs: The importance of second-order opinions for climate politics. British Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 12791307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000321Google Scholar
Milfont, T. L., Evans, L., Sibley, C. G., Ries, J., & Cunningham, A. (2014). Proximity to coast is linked to climate change belief. PLoS ONE, 9(7), Article e103180. https://doi.org/10/f6jkcvGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1987). Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(2), 298305. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.298Google Scholar
Myers, T. A., Maibach, E. W., Placky, B. W., Henry, K. L., Slater, M. D., & Seitter, K. L. (2020). Impact of the Climate Matters program on public understanding of climate change. Weather, Climate, and Society, 12(4), 863876. https://doi.org/10/gg9rkhGoogle Scholar
Myers, T. A., Nisbet, M. C., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2012). A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Climatic Change, 113(3–4), 11051112. https://doi.org/10/h27Google Scholar
Painter, J., & Ashe, T. (2012). Cross-national comparison of the presence of climate scepticism in the print media in six countries, 2007–10. Environmental Research Letters, 7(4), Article 044005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044005Google Scholar
Pearson, A. R., Schuldt, J. P., Romero-Canyas, R., Ballew, M. T., & Larson-Konar, D. (2018). Diverse segments of the US public underestimate the environmental concerns of minority and low-income Americans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(49), 1242912434. https://doi.org/10/cw3wGoogle Scholar
Petersen, A. M., Vincent, E. M., & Westerling, A. L. (2019). Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians. Nature Communications, 10(1), Article 3502. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09959-4Google Scholar
Pew. (2020, 23 June). Two-thirds of Americans think government should do more on climate. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/06/23/two-thirds-of-americans-think-government-should-do-more-on-climate/Google Scholar
Poughter, J., & Castillo, A. (2019). Americans and Germans disagree on the state of bilateral relations, but largely align on key international issues. Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 243256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243Google Scholar
Preston, B. L., Westaway, R. M., & Yuen, E. J. (2011). Climate adaptation planning in practice: An evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 16(4), 407438. https://doi.org/10/dktnvvGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, M., Latella, L., Stern, C., & Jost, J. T. (2016). Beliefs about childhood vaccination in the United States: Political ideology, false consensus, and the illusion of uniqueness. PLoS ONE, 11(7), Article e0158382. https://doi.org/10/gbn7m2Google Scholar
Ranney, M. A., & Clark, D. (2016). Climate change conceptual change: Scientific information can transform attitudes. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(1), 4975. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12187Google Scholar
Roberts, D. (2016, 18 October). The left vs. a carbon tax: The odd, agonizing political battle playing out in Washington state. Vox. https://www.vox.com/2016/10/18/13012394/i-732-carbon-tax-washingtonGoogle Scholar
Rong, F. (2010). Understanding developing country stances on post-2012 climate change negotiations: Comparative analysis of Brazil, China, India, Mexico, and South Africa. Energy Policy, 38(8), 45824591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.014Google Scholar
Roosen, L. J., Klöckner, C. A., & Swim, J. K. (2017). Visual art as a way to communicate climate change: A psychological perspective on climate change–related art. World Art, 8(1), 85110. https://doi.org/10.1080/21500894.2017.1375002Google Scholar
Rosenberg, K. V., Dokter, A. M., Blancher, P. J., et al. (2019). Decline of the North American avifauna. Science, 366(6461), 120124. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1313Google Scholar
Schuldt, J. P., & Pearson, A. R. (2016). The role of race and ethnicity in climate change polarization: Evidence from a U.S. national survey experiment. Climatic Change, 136(3–4), 495505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1631-3Google Scholar
Schuldt, J. P., Pearson, A. R., Romero-Canyas, R., & Larson-Konar, D. (2017). Brief exposure to Pope Francis heightens moral beliefs about climate change. Climatic Change, 141(2), 167177.Google Scholar
Schuldt, J. P., Yuan, Y. C., Song, Y., & Liu, K. (2019). Beliefs about whose beliefs? Second-order beliefs and support for China’s coal-to-gas policy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 66, 101367. https://doi.org/10/ggnfs4Google Scholar
Schweizer, S., Davis, S., & Thompson, J. L. (2013). Changing the conversation about climate change: A theoretical framework for place-based climate change engagement. Environmental Communication, 7(1), 4262. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.753634Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J., & Pratto, F. (2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(1), 4167. https://doi.org/10/b735w5Google Scholar
Sokoloski, R., Markowitz, E. M., & Bidwell, D. (2018). Public estimates of support for offshore wind energy: False consensus, pluralistic ignorance, and partisan effects. Energy Policy, 112, 4555. https://doi.org/10/ghgqbdGoogle Scholar
Sommer, L. K., Swim, J. K., Keller, A., & Klöckner, C. A. (2019). ‘Pollution pods’: The merging of art and psychology to engage the public in climate change. Global Environmental Change, 59, Article 101992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101992Google Scholar
Sparkman, G., & Attari, S. Z. (2020). Credibility, communication, and climate change: How lifestyle inconsistency and do-gooder derogation impact decarbonization advocacy. Energy Research & Social Science, 59, Article 101290. https://doi.org/10/ggbqkxGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. K., Milfont, T. L., Wilson, M. S., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). The influence of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism on environmentalism: A five-year cross-lagged analysis. PLoS ONE, 14(7), Article e0219067. https://doi.org/10/gg3342Google Scholar
Stern, C., West, T. V., Jost, J. T., & Rule, N. O. (2014). ‘Ditto heads’: Do conservatives perceive greater consensus within their ranks than liberals? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(9), 11621177. https://doi.org/10/gg6rh8Google Scholar
Stern, C., West, T. V., & Schmitt, P. G. (2014). The liberal illusion of uniqueness. Psychological Science, 25(1), 137144. https://doi.org/10/ggpbr9Google Scholar
Swim, J. K., & Bloodhart, B. (2018). The intergroup foundations of climate change justice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(3), 472496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217745366Google Scholar
Swim, J. K., & Geiger, N. (2017). From alarmed to dismissive of climate change: A single item assessment of individual differences in concern and issue involvement. Environmental Communication, 11(4), 568586. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1308409Google Scholar
Swim, J. K., Geiger, N., Fraser, J., & Bales, N. (2017). Climate change education at nature-based museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 60(1), 101119. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12187Google Scholar
Swim, J. K., Geiger, N., Sweetland, J., & Fraser, J. (2018). Social construction of scientifically grounded climate change discussions. In Clayton, S. & Manning, C. (Eds.), Psychology and climate change: From denial and depression to adaptation and resilience (pp. 6593). Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755769. https://doi.org/10/dqdhw6Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., & Louis, W. R. (2013). Doing democracy: The social psychological mobilization and consequences of collective action. Social Issues and Policy Review, 7(1), 173200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2012.01047.xGoogle Scholar
Van Bavel, J. J., & Pereira, A. (2018). The partisan brain: An identity-based model of political belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 213224. https://doi.org/10/gc5b3mGoogle Scholar
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLoS ONE, 10(2), Article e0118489. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118489Google Scholar
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2019). The gateway belief model: A large-scale replication. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 4958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.009Google Scholar
Van Zomeren, M. (2013). Four core social‐psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(6), 378388. https://doi.org/10/bfjzGoogle Scholar
Vandenbergh, M. P., & Gilligan, J. M. (2017). Beyond politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, E. U., & Stern, P. C. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66(4), 315328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023253Google Scholar
Wolsko, C. (2017). Expanding the range of environmental values: Political orientation, moral foundations, and the common ingroup. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 284294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.005Google Scholar
Wolsko, C., Ariceaga, H., & Seiden, J. (2016). Red, white, and blue enough to be green: Effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.005Google Scholar
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaval, L., Markowitz, E. M., & Weber, E. U. (2015). How will I be remembered? Conserving the environment for the sake of one’s legacy. Psychological Science, 26(2), 231236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614561266Google Scholar
Zhao, X., Maibach, E., Gandy, J., et al. (2013). Climate change education through TV weathercasts: Results of a field experiment. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 95(1), 117130. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00144.1Google Scholar

References

Backhaus, S., Canetti, D., Gross, M., Waismel-Manor, I., & Cohen, H. (2020). A cyberterrorism effect? Emotional reactions to lethal attacks on critical infrastructure. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(9), 595603.Google Scholar
Bada, M., & Nurse, J. R. (2020). The social and psychological impact of cyberattacks. In Benson, V. & McAlaney, J. (Eds.), Emerging cyber threats and cognitive vulnerabilities (pp. 7392). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. E., Ramaprasad, A., & Samsa, M. E. (2008). Understanding public confidence in government to prevent terrorist attacks. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 5(1).Google Scholar
Bleich, A., Gelkopf, M., & Solomon, Z. (2003). Exposure to terrorism, stress-related mental health symptoms, and coping behaviors among a nationally representative sample in Israel. JAMA, 290(5), 612620.Google Scholar
Bonanno, G. A., & Jost, J. T. (2006). Conservative shift among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(4), 311323.Google Scholar
Bumiller, E., & Shanker, T. (2012, 11 October). Panetta warns of dire threat of cyberattack on US. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/12/world/panetta-warns-of-dire-threat-of-cyberattack.htmlGoogle Scholar
Canetti, D. (2017). Emotional distress, conflict ideology, and radicalization. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(4), 940943.Google Scholar
Canetti, D., Gross, M., Waismel-Manor, I., Levanon, A., & Cohen, H. (2017). How cyberattacks terrorize: Cortisol and personal insecurity jump in the wake of cyberattacks. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(2), 7277.Google Scholar
Canetti, D., Rapaport, C., Wayne, C., Hall, B., & Hobfoll, S. (2013). An exposure effect? Evidence from a rigorous study on the psycho-political outcomes of terrorism. In Sinclair, S. J. & Antonius, D. (Eds.), The political psychology of terrorism fears (pp. 193212). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canetti, D., Russ, E., Luborsky, J., Gerhart, J. I., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2014). Inflamed by the flames? The impact of terrorism and war on immunity. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 27(3), 345352.Google Scholar
Canetti-Nisim, D., Halperin, E., Sharvit, K., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2009). A new stress-based model of political extremism: Personal exposure to terrorism, psychological distress, and exclusionist political attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(3), 363389.Google Scholar
Chanley, V. A. (2002). Trust in government in the aftermath of 9/11: Determinants and consequences. Political Psychology, 23(3), 469483.Google Scholar
Cheung-Blunden, V., Cropper, K., Panis, A., & Davis, K. (2019). Functional divergence of two threat-induced emotions: Fear-based versus anxiety-based cybersecurity preferences. Emotion, 19(8), Article 1353.Google Scholar
Cheung‐Blunden, V., & Ju, J. (2016). Anxiety as a barrier to information processing in the event of a cyberattack. Political Psychology, 37(3), 387400.Google Scholar
Denning, D. E. (2000). Cyberterrorism: Testimony before the special oversight panel on terrorism Committee on Armed Services. US House of Representatives. Focus on Terrorism, 9, 7176.Google Scholar
Denning, D. E. (2007). A view of cyberterrorism five years later. In Himma, K. (Ed.), Internet security: Hacking, counterhacking, and society (pp. 123141). Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
Denning, D. E. (2009). Barriers to entry: Are they lower for cyber warfare? IO Journal, 1(1), Article 4.Google Scholar
Dunn Cavelty, M. (2012). The militarisation of cyberspace: Why less may be better. In 2012 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CYCON June 2012) (pp. 113). IEEE.Google Scholar
Dunn Cavelty, M. (2019). The materiality of cyberthreats: Securitization logics in popular visual culture. Critical Studies on Security, 7(2), 138151.Google Scholar
Egloff, F. (2020). Intentions and cyberterrorism. In Cornish, P. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of cyber security (pp. 124). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eun, Y.-S., & Aßmann, J. S. (2016). Cyberwar: Taking stock of security and warfare in the digital age. International Studies Perspectives, 17(3), 343360.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. H., & Roseman, I. J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 103115.Google Scholar
Gartzke, E. (2013). The myth of cyberwar: Bringing war in cyberspace back down to earth. International Security, 38(2), 4173.Google Scholar
Gomez, M. (2021). Strategic preferences in cyberspace: A cognitive-cultural approach [Working Paper].Google Scholar
Gomez, M., & Whyte, C. (2021). Cyber malaise: The effects of extended exposure to cybersecurity incidents [Working Paper].Google Scholar
Gomez, M. A., & Villar, E. B. (2018). Fear, uncertainty, and dread: Cognitive heuristics and cyber threats. Politics and Governance, 6(2), 6172.Google Scholar
Gomez, M. A., & Whyte, C. (2020). Cyber wargaming: Grappling with uncertainty in a complex domain. Defense Strategy & Assessment Journal, 10(1), 95135.Google Scholar
Gross, M. L., Canetti, D., & Vashdi, D. R. (2016). The psychological effects of cyber-terrorism. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 72(5), 284291.Google Scholar
Gross, M. L., Canetti, D., & Vashdi, D. R. (2017). Cyberterrorism: Its effects on psychological well-being, public confidence and political attitudes. Journal of Cybersecurity, 3(1), 4958.Google Scholar
Halperin, E., Russell, A. G., Dweck, C. S., & Gross, J. J. (2011). Anger, hatred, and the quest for peace: Anger can be constructive in the absence of hatred. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(2), 274291.Google Scholar
Hansen, L., & Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Digital disaster, cyber security, and the Copenhagen School. International Studies Quarterly, 53(4), 11551175.Google Scholar
Hetherington, M. J., & Nelson, M. (2003). Anatomy of a rally effect: George W. Bush and the war on terrorism. PS: Political Science & Politics, 36(1), 3742.Google Scholar
Holt, T. J., Kilger, M., Chiang, L., & Yang, C. S. (2017). Exploring the correlates of individual willingness to engage in ideologically motivated cyberattacks. Deviant Behavior, 38(3), 356373.Google Scholar
Hua, J., Chen, Y., & Luo, X. R. (2018). Are we ready for cyberterrorist attacks? Examining the role of individual resilience. Information & Management, 55(7), 928938.Google Scholar
Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Taber, C., & Lahav, G. (2005). Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 593608.Google Scholar
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. Free Press.Google Scholar
Janoff-Bulman, R., & Usoof-Thowfeek, R. (2009). Shifting moralities: Post-9/11 responses to shattered national assumptions. In Morgan, M. J. (Ed.), The impact of 9/11 on psychology and education (pp. 8196). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jardine, E., & Porter, N. D. (2020). Pick your poison: The attribution paradox in cyberwar. SocArXiv, etb72.Google Scholar
Jarvis, L., Macdonald, S., & Whiting, A. (2017). Unpacking cyberterrorism discourse: Specificity, status, and scale in news media constructions of threat. European Journal of International Security, 2(1), 6487.Google Scholar
Jensen, B., & Valeriano, B. (2019). Cyber escalation dynamics: Results from war game experiments. International Studies Association, Annual Meeting Panel: War Gaming and Simulations in International Conflict, 27 March.Google Scholar
Kertzer, J. D., Oppenheimer, H., & Zeitzoff, T. (2021). Do cyberattacks corrode?: Cyberattacks and domestic politics [Working Paper].Google Scholar
Kostyuk, N., & Wayne, C. (2020). The microfoundations of state cybersecurity: Cyber risk perceptions and the mass public. Journal of Global Security Studies, 6(2), Article ogz077.Google Scholar
Kreps, S., & Schneider, J. (2019). Escalation firebreaks in the cyber, conventional, and nuclear domains: Moving beyond effects-based logics. Journal of Cybersecurity, 5(1), Article tyz007.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. (2019, October). What prevents cyber-terrorism? The psychology of a puzzle [Paper presented at the International Cyber-Terrorism Symposium, Haifa, Israel].Google Scholar
Lachow, I. (2009). Cyber-terrorism: Menace or myth. In Kramer, F. D., Starr, S. H., & Wentz, L. K. (Eds.), Cyberpower and national security (pp. 434467). National Defense University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, S. T. (2019). Cybersecurity discourse in the United States: Cyber-doom rhetoric and beyond. Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, C., Choi, K. S., Shandler, R., & Kayser, C. (2021). Mapping global cyberterror networks: An empirical study of Al-Qaeda and ISIS cyberterrorism events. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1177/10439862211001606Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146159.Google Scholar
Lindsay, J. R. (2013, April). Proxy wars: Control problems in irregular warfare and cyber operations. In International Studies Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco. http://www.jonrlindsay.com/papersGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, J. R. (2015). Tipping the scales: The attribution problem and the feasibility of deterrence against cyberattack. Journal of Cybersecurity, 1(1), 5367.Google Scholar
Macdonald, S., Jarvis, L., & Nouri, L. (2015). State cyberterrorism: A contradiction in terms? Contemporary Voices: St Andrews Journal of International Relations, 6(3), 6275.Google Scholar
Maschmeyer, L., Deibert, R. J., & Lindsay, J. R. (2020). A tale of two cybers: How threat reporting by cybersecurity firms systematically underrepresents threats to civil society. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(1), 120.Google Scholar
Matzkin, S., Shandler, R., & Canetti, D. (2021). Off-track, on confidence: Public confidence following cyber terrorism – a survey – experiments in trilateral democracies [Working Paper].Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (2016, 10 February). Americans cite cyberterrorism among top three threats to U.S. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/189161/americans-cite-cyberterrorism-among-top-three-threats.aspxGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R. (2010). Decision making under uncertainty. In Proceedings of a workshop deterring cyberattacks: Informing strategies and developing options for U.S. policy (pp. 227241). National Academies Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, R. (2019). Some emotional considerations in cyber conflict. Journal of Cyber Policy, 4(3), 309325.Google Scholar
McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2014). The study of international politics in the neurobiological revolution: A review of leadership and political violence. Millennium, 43(1), 92123.Google Scholar
Merolla, J. L., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2009). Democracy at risk: How terrorist threats affect the public. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Neria, Y., DiGrande, L., & Adams, B. G. (2011). Posttraumatic stress disorder following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: A review of the literature among highly exposed populations. American Psychologist, 66(6), 429446.Google Scholar
Norman, J. (2018, 5 March). North Korea, cyberterrorism top threats to U.S. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/228437/north-korea-cyberterrorism-top-threats.aspxGoogle Scholar
Nurse, J. R. C. (2018). Cybercrime and you: How criminals attack and the human factors that they seek to exploit. In Attrill-Smith, A., Fullwood, C., Keep, M., & Kuss, D. J. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of cyberpsychology (2nd ed., pp. 663691). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198812746.013.35Google Scholar
Nye, J. S. (2011). Nuclear lessons for cyber security? Strategic Studies Quarterly, 5(4), 1838.Google Scholar
Ojeda, C. (2016). The effect of 9/11 on the heritability of political trust. Political Psychology, 37(1), 7388.Google Scholar
Robles, F., & Perlroth, N. (2021, 8 February). ‘Dangerous stuff’: Hackers tried to poison water supply of Florida Town. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/08/us/oldsmar-florida-water-supply-hack.htmlGoogle Scholar
Schneider, J. (2017, March). Cyber and crisis escalation: Insights from wargaming. USASOC Futures Forum.Google Scholar
Shandler, R., Gross, M. G., Backhaus, S., & Canetti, D. (2021). Cyber terrorism and public support for retaliation: A multi-country survey experiment. British Journal of Political Science, 1–19.Google Scholar
Shandler, R., Gross, M. G., & Canetti, D. (2021). A fragile public preference for using cyber strikes: Evidence from survey experiments in the United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Contemporary Security Policy, 42(2), 135162.Google Scholar
Silver, R. C., Holman, E. A., McIntosh, D. N., Poulin, M., & Gil-Rivas, V. (2002). Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. JAMA, 288(10), 12351244.Google Scholar
Slayton, R. (2017). What is the cyber offense-defense balance? Conceptions, causes, and assessment. International Security, 41(3), 72109.Google Scholar
Slone, M., & Shoshani, A. (2006). Evaluation of preparatory measures for coping with anxiety raised by media coverage of terrorism. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(4), 535542.Google Scholar
Snider, K., Hefetz, A., Shandler, R., & Canetti, D. (2021). Threatened by cyberattacks and supporting surveillance policies in the big brother state [Working Paper].Google Scholar
Snider, K., Zandani, S., Shandler, R., & Canetti, D. (2021). Cyber attacks, cyber threats and attitudes toward cybersecurity policies. Journal of Cybersecurity [Manuscript submitted for publication].Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Worst-case scenarios. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tidy, J. (2020, 18 September). Police launch homicide inquiry after German hospital hack. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54204356Google Scholar
Valeriano, B., & Gomez, M. A. (2020). The failure of academic progress in cybersecurity. Council on Foreign Relations Blog. www.cfr.org/blog/failure-academic-progress-cybersecurityGoogle Scholar
Valeriano, B., & Maness, R. C. (2015). Cyber war versus cyber realities: Cyber conflict in the international system. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Valeriano, B., & Maness, R. C. (2018). International relations theory and cyber security. In Brown, C. & Eckersley, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international political theory (pp. 259273). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Valeriano, B. G., & Jensen, B. (2019). The myth of the cyber offense: The case for cyber restraint. Cato Institute Policy Analysis, no. 862.Google Scholar
Van Schaik, P., Jeske, D., Onibokun, J., Coventry, L., Jansen, J., & Kusev, P. (2017). Risk perceptions of cyber-security and precautionary behaviour. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 547559.Google Scholar
Wayne, C. (2019). Risk or retribution: The micro-foundations of state responses to terror [Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan].Google Scholar

References

Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3Google Scholar
Bar-On, D., & Adwan, S. (2006). The PRIME shared history project. In Iram, Y., Wahrman, H., & Gross, Z. (Eds.), Educating toward a culture of peace (pp. 309323). Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Bar-Tal, D. (2000). From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation: Psychological analysis. Political Psychology, 21(2), 351365. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00192Google Scholar
Bar-Tal, D., Chernyak-Hai, L., Schori, N., & Gundar, A. (2009). A sense of self-perceived collective victimhood in intractable conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross, 91(874), 229258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383109990221Google Scholar
Barton, K. C., & McCully, A. W. (2012). Trying to ‘see things differently’: Northern Ireland students’ struggle to understand alternative historical perspectives. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40(4), 371408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.710928Google Scholar
Beneda, M., Witkowska, M., Khachatryan, N., Grigoryan, N., & Bilewicz, M. (2018). Fostering inter-group forgiveness after genocide. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 25(2), 193212. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM25.2.3Google Scholar
Berndsen, M., & McGarty, C. (2010). The impact of magnitude of harm and perceived difficulty of making reparations on group-based guilt and reparation towards victims of historical harm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3), 500513. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.642Google Scholar
Bilali, R. (2013). National narrative and social psychological influences in Turks’ denial of the mass killings of Armenians as genocide. Journal of Social Issues, 69(1), 1633. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12001Google Scholar
Bilali, R., Iqbal, Y., & Erisen, C. (2019). The role of lay beliefs about group transgressions in acceptance of responsibility for ingroup harm‐doing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(5), 9921006. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2583Google Scholar
Bilali, R., Iqbal, Y., & Freel, S. (2020). Understanding and counteracting genocide denial. In Newman, L. S. (Ed.). Confronting humanity at its worst: Social psychological perspectives on genocide (pp. 284311). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bilali, R., & Mahmoud, R. (2017). Confronting history and reconciliation: A review of civil society’s approaches to transforming conflict narratives. In Psaltis, C., Carrerero, M., & Čehajić-Clancy, S. (Eds.), History education and conflict transformation (pp. 7796). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bilali, R., & Ross, M. A. (2012). Remembering intergroup conflict. In Tropp, L. R. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 123135). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bilali, R., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2013). Priming effects of a reconciliation radio drama on historical perspective-taking in the aftermath of mass violence in Rwanda. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 144151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.011Google Scholar
Bilali, R., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2019). Victim and perpetrator groups’ divergent perspectives on collective violence: Implications for intergroup relations. Advances in Political Psychology, 40(1), 75108. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12570Google Scholar
Bilali, R., Vollhardt, J. R., & Rarick, J. R. D. (2016). Assessing the impact of a media-based intervention to prevent intergroup violence and promote positive intergroup relations in Burundi. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 26(3), 221235. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2246Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M. (2016). The dark side of emotion regulation: Historical defensiveness as an obstacle in reconciliation. Psychological Inquiry, 27(2), 8995. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1162130Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M., & Jaworska, M. (2013). Reconciliation through the righteous: The narratives of heroic helpers as a fulfillment of emotional needs in Polish-Jewish intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 69(1), 162179. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12009Google Scholar
Brounéus, K. (2010). The trauma of truth telling: Effects of witnessing in the Rwandan Gacaca courts on psychological health. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54(3), 408437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002709360322Google Scholar
Brown, R., & Čehajić, S. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(4), 669684. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.466Google Scholar
Cárdenas, M., Páez, D., Rimé, B., & Arnoso, M. (2015). How transitional justice processes and official apologies influence reconciliation: The case of the Chilean ‘Truth and Reconciliation’ and ‘Political Imprisonment and Torture’ commissions. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 25(6), 515530. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2231Google Scholar
Čehajić-Clancy, S., & Bilewicz, M. (2017). Fostering reconciliation through historical moral exemplars in a postconflict society. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23(3), 288296. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000210Google Scholar
Čehajić‐Clancy, S., & Bilewicz, M. (2020). Appealing to moral exemplars: Shared perception of morality as an essential ingredient of intergroup reconciliation. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 217243. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12067Google Scholar
Čehajić-Clancy, S., Effron, D. A., Halperin, E., Liberman, V., & Ross, L. D. (2011). Affirmation, acknowledgment of in-group responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 256270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023936Google Scholar
Čehajić-Clancy, S., Goldenberg, A., Gross, J. J., & Halperin, E. (2016). Social-psychological interventions for intergroup reconciliation: An emotion regulation perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 27(2), 7388. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1153945Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cohrs, J. C., McNeill, A., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2015). The two-sided role of inclusive victimhood for intergroup reconciliation: Evidence from Northern Ireland. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(4), 634647. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000141Google Scholar
Čorkalo Biruški, D., Ajdukovic, D., & Stanic, A. (2014). When the world collapses: changed worldview and social reconstruction in a traumatized community. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5(1), Article 24098. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.24098Google Scholar
Fryberg, S., & Eason, A. (2017). Making the invisible visible: Acts of commission and omission. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 554559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417720959Google Scholar
Gaertner, S., & Dovidio, J. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gausel, N., & Brown, R. (2012). Shame and guilt: Do they really differ in their focus of evaluation? Wanting to change the self and behavior in response to ingroup immorality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 152(5), 547567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.657265Google Scholar
Gausel, N., Leach, C., Vignoles, V., & Brown, R. (2012). Defend or repair? Explaining responses to in-group moral failure by disentangling feelings of shame, rejection, and inferiority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 941960. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027233Google Scholar
Greenaway, K., Louis, W., & Wohl, M. (2012). Awareness of common humanity reduces empathy and heightens expectations of forgiveness for temporally distant wrongdoing. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(4), 446454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611425861Google Scholar
Greenaway, K., Quinn, E., & Louis, W. (2011). Appealing to common humanity increases forgiveness but reduces collective action among victims of historical atrocities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 569573. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.802Google Scholar
Halperin, E. (2013). Emotion, emotion regulation, and conflict resolution. Emotion Review, 6(1), 6876. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913491844Google Scholar
Hameiri, B., & Nadler, A. (2017). Looking backward to move forward: Effects of acknowledgment of victimhood on readiness to compromise for peace in the protracted Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(4), 555569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216689064Google Scholar
Hasan-Aslih, S., Pliskin, R., van Zomeren, M., Halperin, E., & Saguy, T. (2019). A darker side of hope: Harmony-focused hope decreases collective action intentions among the disadvantaged. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), 209223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218783190Google Scholar
Imhoff, R., Wohl, M., & Erb, H.‐P. (2013). When the past is far from dead: How ongoing consequences of genocides committed by the ingroup impact collective guilt. Journal of Social Issues, 69(1), 7491. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12004Google Scholar
Iqbal, Y., & Bilali, R. (2018). The impact of acknowledgment and denial of responsibility for harm on victim groups’ perceptions of justice, power and intergroup attitudes in Bangladesh. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 397411. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2338Google Scholar
Jeong, H., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2020). Koreans’ collective victim beliefs about Japanese colonization. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000496Google Scholar
Jeong, H., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2021). Different collective memories of Japanese colonization in Korea: Consequences for distinct preferences for strategies to deal with the past. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 24(3), 392404. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12449Google Scholar
Jogdand, J., Khan, S., & Reicher, S. (2020). The context, content, and claims of humiliation in response to collective victimhood. In Vollhardt, J. R. (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 7799). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kanazayire, C., Licata, L., Mélotte, P., Dusingizemungu, J., & Azzi, A. (2014). Does identification with Rwanda increase reconciliation sentiments between genocide survivors and non-victims? The mediating roles of perceived intergroup similarity and self-esteem during commemorations. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2(1), 489504. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.319Google Scholar
Kanyangara, P., Rimé, B., Paez, D., & Yzerbyt, V. (2014). Trust, individual guilt, collective guilt and dispositions toward reconciliation among Rwandan survivors and prisoners before and after their participation in postgenocide Gacaca courts in Rwanda. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2(1), 401416. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.299Google Scholar
Kanyangara, P., Rimé, B., Philippot, P., & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Collective rituals, emotional climate and intergroup perception: Participation in ‘Gacaca’ tribunals and assimilation of the Rwandan genocide. Journal of Social Issues, 63(2), 387403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540–4560.2007.00515.xGoogle Scholar
Leach, C., Bou Zeineddine, F., & Čehajić‐Clancy, S. (2013). Moral immemorial: The rarity of self‐criticism for previous generations’ genocide or mass violence. Journal of Social Issues, 69(1), 3453. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12002Google Scholar
Leach, C. (2020). The unifying potential of an appraisal approach to the experience of group victimization. In Vollhardt, J. (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 141159). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leone, G., & Sarrica, M. (2014). Making room for negative emotions about the national past: An explorative study of effects of parrhesia on Italian colonial crimes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43(A), 126138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.08.008Google Scholar
Li, M., Leidner, B., Petrović, N., Orazani, S., & Rad, M. S. (2018). The role of retributive justice and the use of international criminal tribunals in post‐conflict reconciliation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 133151. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2326Google Scholar
Licata, L., Khan, S., Lastrego, S., Cabecinhas, R., Valentim, J., & Liu, J. (2018). Social representations of colonialism in Africa and in Europe: Structure and relevance for contemporary intergroup relations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 62, 6879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.05.004Google Scholar
Licata, L., Klein, O., Saade, W., Azzi, A. E., & Branscombe, N. R. (2012). Perceived out-group (dis) continuity and attribution of responsibility for the Lebanese civil war mediate effects of national and religious subgroup identification on intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(2), 179192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211414445Google Scholar
Minow, M. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness. Beacon.Google Scholar
McNeill, A., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2020). ‘We all suffered!’: The role of power in rhetorical strategies of inclusive victimhood and its consequences for intergroup relations. In Vollhardt, J. R. (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moss, S., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2016). ‘You can’t give a syringe with unity’: Rwandan responses to the government’s single recategorization policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 16(1), 325359. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12097Google Scholar
Nadler, A. (2012). Intergroup reconciliation: Definitions, processes, and future directions. In Tropp, L. R. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 291308). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, A., Malloy, T., & Fisher, J. D. (2008). Intergroup reconciliation: Dimensions and themes. In Nadler, A., Malloy, T., & Fisher, J. (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 1532). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, A., & Shnabel, N. (2015). Intergroup reconciliation: Instrumental and socio-emotional processes and the needs-based model. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 93125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1106712Google Scholar
Noor, M., Brown, R., & Prentice, G. (2008). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 481495. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X238751Google Scholar
Noor, M., Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & Nadler, A. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(4), 351374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312440048Google Scholar
Opotow, S. (2001). Reconciliation in times of impunity: Challenges for social justice. Social Justice Research, 14(2), 149170. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012888902705Google Scholar
Penić, S., Vollhardt, J. R., & Reicher, S. (2021). Reconciliation versus justice? It depends on the context: The role of symmetric and asymmetric violence in predicting post-conflict attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(2), 202212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620915064Google Scholar
Rimé, B., Kanyangara, P., Yzerbyt, V., & Paez, D. (2011). The impact of Gacaca tribunals in Rwanda: Psychosocial effects of participation in a truth and reconciliation process after a genocide. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(6), 695706. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.822Google Scholar
Rouhana, N. (2018). Decolonization as reconciliation: Rethinking the national conflict paradigm in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41(4), 643662. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1324999Google Scholar
Saguy, T. (2018). Downside of intergroup harmony? When reconciliation might backfire and what to do. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(1), 7581. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732217747085Google Scholar
Salter, P., & Adams, G. (2016). On the intentionality of cultural products: Representations of Black history as psychological affordances. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1166. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01166Google Scholar
Schori‐Eyal, N., Halperin, E., & Bar‐Tal, D. (2014). Three layers of collective victimhood: effects of multileveled victimhood on intergroup conflicts in the Israeli–Arab context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(12), 778794. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12268Google Scholar
Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J., & Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), 10211030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209336610Google Scholar
Sibley, C., Liu, J., Duckitt, J., & Khan, S. (2008). Social representations of history and the legitimation of social inequality: The form and function of historical negation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 542565. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.449Google Scholar
Starzyk, K., & Ross, M. (2008). A tarnished silver lining: Victim suffering and support for reparations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(3), 366380. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167207311280Google Scholar
Staub, E. (2006). Reconciliation after genocide, mass killing, or intractable conflict: Understanding the roots of violence, psychological recovery, and steps toward a general theory. Political Psychology, 27(6), 867894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00541.xGoogle Scholar
Staub, E., & Bar-Tal, D. (2003). Genocide, mass killing and intractable conflict: Roots, evolution, prevention and reconciliation. In Sears, D., Huddy, L., & Jarvis, R. (Eds.), Handbook of political psychology (pp. 710755). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Subašić, E., & Reynolds, K. (2009). Beyond ‘practical’ reconciliation: Intergroup inequality and the meaning of non‐indigenous identity. Political Psychology, 30(2), 243267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00690.xGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L., Štambuk, M., Čorkalo Biruški, D., & O’Driscoll, D. (2020). Transgenerational transmission of collective victimhood through a developmental intergroup framework: The lasting power of group narratives of suffering. In Vollhardt, J. (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 3755). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Twali, M., Hameiri, B., Vollhardt, J.R., & Nadler, A. (2020). Experiencing acknowledgment versus denial of the ingroup’s collective victimization. In Vollhardt, J. R. (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 297318). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ulug, M., Bilali, R., Karasu, M., & Malo, L. (2021). Obstacles to reconciliation and forgiveness among victim groups of unacknowledged past trauma and genocide. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(2), 313325. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2740Google Scholar
Vollhardt, J. R. (2012a). Collective victimization. In Tropp, L. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 136157). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vollhardt, J. R. (2012b). Interpreting rights and duties after mass violence. Culture and Psychology, 18(1), 133145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X11427467Google Scholar
Vollhardt, J. R. (2013). ‘Crime against humanity’ or ‘Crime against Jews’? Acknowledgment in construals of the Holocaust and its importance for intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 69(1), 144161. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12008Google Scholar
Vollhardt, J. R. (2015). Inclusive victim consciousness in advocacy, social movements, and intergroup relations: Promises and pitfalls. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9(1), 89120. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12011Google Scholar
Vollhardt, J. R., & Bilali, R. (2015). The role of inclusive and exclusive victim consciousness in predicting intergroup attitudes: Findings from Rwanda, Burundi, and DRC. Political Psychology, 36(5), 489506. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12174Google Scholar
Vollhardt, J. R., Mazur, L. B., & Lemahieu, M. (2014). Acknowledgment after mass violence: Effects on psychological well-being and intergroup relations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17(3), 306323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213517270Google Scholar
Vollhardt, J. R., & Twali, M. S. (2016). Emotion-based reconciliation requires attention to power differences, critical consciousness, and structural change. Psychological Inquiry, 27(2), 136143. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1160762Google Scholar
Witkowska, M., Beneda, M., Cehajić-Clancy, S., & Bilewicz, M. (2019). Fostering contact after historical atrocities: The potential of moral exemplars. Political Psychology, 40(3), 565582. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12529Google Scholar
Wohl, M., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 288303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.288Google Scholar
Wohl, M., & Branscombe, N. (2008). Remembering historical victimization: collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 9881006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.988Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×